Notes: Scientific Method. What is Science? the pursuit of knowledge and understanding.
Scientific Knowledge and Social Science
-
Upload
william-molnar -
Category
Documents
-
view
256 -
download
0
Transcript of Scientific Knowledge and Social Science
1William Molnar
Week 2 Assignment
By
William Molnar
select one social science (or behavioral science), say what science is and how scientific knowledge differs from other sorts of knowledge,
explain whether the definition that you give applies to the social science that you selected,
present at least one moderately plausible or documented reason why someone might believe that the social science that you selected is not a science, and
evaluate that reason.
The social science that I have selected is education. Science is facts, concepts,
principles, laws, theories, and models that can be acquired in many ways. Steven D.
Schafersman (1994) states science is discovering facts about them, formulating laws and
principles through systemic observation. In its broadest sense, science refers to any
systematic knowledge or practice on its more usual restricted sense; science refers to a
system of acquiring knowledge as well as to the organized body of knowledge gained
through such research. Dictionary.com defines “Science” as a “branch of knowledge or study
dealing with a body of facts or truths systematically arranged and showing the operation of
general laws. It is the systematic knowledge of the physical or material world gained through
ovservation and experimenation”.
In the field of scientific knowledge, Peter Anthony Glick (2007) states that scientific
knowledge is developed by a living system and is a mix of experience, values and insights.
Sayer (1992) states “knowledge is primarily gained through activity both in attempting to
change our environment through labor or work and through interaction with other people ,
2William Molnar
using shared resources, in particular a common language” (pp 13-14).
I believe that Schafersman’s definition of science applies to education especially
his comments on systematic observation being a natural event and conditions in order to
discover facts about them. In the field of education, students observe through visual, tactile,
and aural senses and discover facts through these senses. Education is experience and
information, values, and insights that provide a framework for gaining new experiences and
information.
It would be difficult to document why someone might believe that education is not a
science because all of Sayer’s points can prove that it is. One could argue assessments are
based on subjective criteria and makes it difficult for results to be reproduced. What works
for one teacher does not work for another due to the individual dynamics. The human
element can never be fully reproduced during the implementation process, which further
blurs the line between that which is science and that which is an art. I do not accept this
argument. Education is a process whereby a student learns knowledge of unknown material
based on material already known. Sayer states “to develop ‘knowledge’ we need raw
materials and tools on which and with which we can work… in trying to understand the
world, we use existing knowledge and skills, drawn from whatever cultural resources are
available, to work” (p 16). In his discussion on the relationship between subject and object,
the subject side of his example is an example of the student and the object side, the thing
being studied is the knowledge being discovered by the student. Sayer’s model of subject and
object can be applied to the field of education. Sayer states that subjects such as academics
are in a double relationship to their object and to other subjects. In relation to education,
Sayer’s point on social phenomena can be applied. These ideas, beliefs, etc. are held by the
3William Molnar
educator and are transferred to the observer, the student. In conclusion, Sayer states that
“Knowledge-whether adequate or not-never develops in a vacuum but is always embedded in
social practices and we can more fully understand the former if we know the latter” (p 43). I
believe the message Sayer is trying to convey is that knowledge is never developed within an
empty space and we are surrounded by knowledge in the social practices we perform, in my
case education. Knowledge can be better understood if we understand the social practice we
are involved in such as education.