Science Under Assault

155
John Droz, jr. Physicist & Environmental Advocate NC State Legislature 2/6/13 b SCIENCE Under Assault

description

Science is under siege by those with economic or political agendas. The environmental area is one of the worst examples. [For the more detailed version of this presentation see "ScienceUnderAssault.Info".]

Transcript of Science Under Assault

Page 1: Science Under Assault

John Droz, jr. Physicist & Environmental Advocate NC State Legislature 2/6/13 b

SCIENCEUnder Assault

Page 2: Science Under Assault

NOTE: SlideShare has had some issues with translatingpresentations properly. Hopefully they are temporary.

If some slides are hard to read, or are missing graphics,please download the PDF version, which is much better quality.

(Click the “Save” button above the window: it’s only a 6± MB file.)

(Use your keyboard arrow keys to navigate here, or the PDF.

This will allow you to proceed at your own pace.)

Page 3: Science Under Assault

Science Under AssaultThese are the slides of my talk given to the North Carolina Legislators (as well as other NC Agency people, and the public) in Raleigh, NC, on February 6th, 2013.

This version is without audio (or extra annotations on the slides), so is missing a considerable amount of information presented with the dialogue that accompanied the slides. A video of this slide-set with audio is at YouTube: <<tinyurl.com/bjpnfmk>>.

An expanded edition of this presentation is at ScienceUnderAssault.Info. That version includes about a hundred extra slides that the live version did not have the time for. It also includes six pages of links for the material presented and referenced here.

In other words, this (and the YouTube video) versions are shorter & simpler — but less complete. Your choice.

Email me at “[email protected]” for any questions, or suggestions for improvements.

— ENJOY!

john droz,jr.

Page 4: Science Under Assault
Page 5: Science Under Assault

A LOT More About WhatYou’ll See Today,

is Online at:

ScienceUnderAssault.Info

Page 6: Science Under Assault

Part 1:Some Basics

Page 7: Science Under Assault

Who said:“Any man who can drive safely

while kissing a pretty girl is simply not giving the kiss the attention it deserves”?

That means there are:— some who are smart and others not,— some who have integrity and others do not,— some who have a sense of humor and others do not, etc.

Scientist are Regular People!

Page 8: Science Under Assault

The difference betweenthe right word and the almost right word

is the difference betweenlightning and lightning bug.

— Mark Twain

Words are IMPORTANT!

Page 9: Science Under Assault

Note How the Promoters Keep Lookingfor the Most Persuasive Marketing Words...

Catastrophic Anthropogenic Global Warming

Anthropogenic Global Warming

Global Warming

Climate Change

Climate Disruption

Page 10: Science Under Assault

Whatever Happens, It’s All “Climate Change”

Page 11: Science Under Assault

What is “Science”?

Page 12: Science Under Assault

Science is nota collection of Theorems

E = MC (Einstein's Theory of Relativity)

F = G (Newton’s Law of Gravitation)

Page 13: Science Under Assault

Science is a way of thinking, much more than it is a body of knowledge. Our species needs, and deserves, a citizenry with minds wide-awake, and with a basic understanding of how the world works.

— Dr. Carl Sagan (Astro-physicist)

Science has its weaknesses and it doesn't have a stranglehold on the truth, but it has a way of approaching technical issues that is a closer approximation of truth than any other method we have.

— Dr. Richard Muller (Physicist at Berkeley)

Page 14: Science Under Assault

Science is aPROCESS

Page 15: Science Under Assault
Page 16: Science Under Assault

Scientific Processis an assessment that is:

1) Comprehensive, 2) Independent, 3) Transparent, 4) Empirical

Real WorldAll Data Available

ObjectiveTechnical,

Economic, &Environmental

Page 17: Science Under Assault

Science is a PROCESS that Works Like This:

When a new idea (hypothesis) is proposedas a potential solution to a problem,

it is up to the advocates to provide the scientific evidence that verifies its efficacy.

(It’s not our obligation to disprove it.)

Page 18: Science Under Assault
Page 19: Science Under Assault

Part 2:Science and Religion

Page 20: Science Under Assault

Religion

Faith

Science

Facts

Page 21: Science Under Assault
Page 22: Science Under Assault
Page 23: Science Under Assault
Page 24: Science Under Assault

Environmentalism:The New Religion,Freely Taught in Schools

Page 25: Science Under Assault

NewReligion

Faith

Science

Facts

Page 26: Science Under Assault

NewReligion

Faith

Science

Facts

Page 27: Science Under Assault

Public Praises Science

Page 28: Science Under Assault

NewReligion

Faith

Science

Facts

Page 29: Science Under Assault

NewReligion

Faith

Science

Facts

Page 30: Science Under Assault

NewReligion

Faith

New“Science”

Fiction

Page 31: Science Under Assault

Science is the enemy of agenda promoters.

Page 32: Science Under Assault

Their Primary Goal:Undermine the Authority of Science

Page 33: Science Under Assault

NewReligion

Faith

Science

Facts

Page 34: Science Under Assault

Many mainstream environmental leaderswant to be free of Science,

so they can then pursueother political objectives.

Page 35: Science Under Assault

Environmentalism is a Substitute for a Religion

Page 36: Science Under Assault

War of World Views:Environmentalism vsthe Judeo-Christian Tradition

Page 37: Science Under Assault

Part 3:Some Tricks to Try to

Get Around Real Science

Page 38: Science Under Assault

1- Using Correlation to imply Causality.

Some Tricks to fool the trusting and the unwary...

Page 39: Science Under Assault

Some Tricks to fool the trusting and the unwary...Correlation Does NOT prove Causation!

Page 40: Science Under Assault

Some Tricks to fool the trusting and the unwary...Correlation Does NOT prove Causation!

Page 41: Science Under Assault

Some Tricks to fool the trusting and the unwary...Correlation Does NOT prove Causation!

Page 42: Science Under Assault

Some Tricks to fool the trusting and the unwary...Correlation Does NOT prove Causation!

Does this prove that there is Global Warming?

Page 43: Science Under Assault

Some Tricks to fool the trusting and the unwary...Correlation Does NOT prove Causation!

Page 44: Science Under Assault

Some Tricks to fool the trusting and the unwary...Correlation Does NOT prove Causation!

Page 45: Science Under Assault

Some Tricks to fool the trusting and the unwary...Correlation Does NOT prove Causation!

Page 46: Science Under Assault

2- Using Consensus to imply Correctness.

Some Tricks to fool the trusting and the unwary...

Page 47: Science Under Assault

Some Tricks to fool the trusting and the unwary...

Two Points —1 - Consensus is not part of the Scientific Process, and2 - Whether there is a real consensus is unknown.

Page 48: Science Under Assault

“Let’s be clear: the work of science has nothing whatever to do with consensus. Consensus is the business of politics. Science, on the contrary, requires only one investigator who happens to be right, which means that he or she has results that are verifiable by reference to the real world.

“Consensus is irrelevant: what is relevant is reproducible results. The greatest scientists in history are great precisely because they broke with the consensus.”

— Michael Crichton January 17, 2003: speech at the California Institute of Technology

Some Tricks to fool the trusting and the unwary...

Consensus is not part of the Scientific Process

Page 49: Science Under Assault

Some Tricks to fool the trusting and the unwary...

Consensus is not part of the Scientific Process

Einstein re consensus —

“He who joyfully marches to music in rank and file has already earned my contempt.He has been given a large brain by mistake, since for him a spinal cord would suffice.”

“Few people are capable of expressing opinions that differ from the prejudices of their social environment. Most people are even incapable of forming such opinions.”

Page 50: Science Under Assault

Up until recently, the entire medical establishmentbelieved that ulcers were primarily caused by stress…

Every Medical Doctor in the world,Every Medical PhD Researcher in the world,

Every Medical Hospital in the world,Every Medical School in the world,

Every Medical Textbook in the world,Every Medical Journal in the world,

Every Pharmaceutical Company in the world, etc.

THEY WERE ALL WRONG!

Some Tricks to fool the trusting and the unwary...

Consensus is not part of the Scientific Process

Page 51: Science Under Assault

Consensus is not part of the Scientific ProcessSome Tricks to fool the trusting and the unwary...

Page 52: Science Under Assault

Whether there is a Real Consensus is UnknownSome Tricks to fool the trusting and the unwary...

A March 2008 canvas of 51,000 members of the Canadian Association of Professional Engineers, Geologists and Geophysics of Alberta (APEGGA):

of the respondents —

— 99% believe climate is changing.

— Only 32% agreed with the statement that:

“…the debate on the scientific causes of recent climate change is settled.”

— Only 26% of them attributed global warming primarily to:

“human activity like burning fossil fuels.”

Page 53: Science Under Assault

Some Tricks to fool the trusting and the unwary...

Note how they subtly (dishonestly) changed it from being “97% of scientists” to

“97% of scientific experts”.Those are not the same thing.

And the“97% of scientific experts”

is also false.

Whether there is a Real Consensus is Unknown

Page 54: Science Under Assault

Some Tricks to fool the trusting and the unwary...Whether there is a Real Consensus is Unknown

Page 55: Science Under Assault

Some Tricks to fool the trusting and the unwary...

Note:75÷77 = 97%, but75÷10,257 ≠ 97%!

Whether there is a Real Consensus is Unknown

Page 56: Science Under Assault

3- Using “Peer Review” to imply Accuracy.

Some Tricks to fool the trusting and the unwary...

Page 57: Science Under Assault

What is Peer Review?1 - "Peer Review" is applicable in one primary situation: when a scientist is proposing a new hypothesis.

2 - "Peer Review" is simply the opinions of selected other scientists about the acceptability of a proposed hypothesis.

3 - Even if all these selected other scientists agree with the hypothesis, that does not constitute scientific proof that the hypothesis is accurate.

Some Tricks to fool the trusting and the unwary...

Page 58: Science Under Assault

Some Tricks to fool the trusting and the unwary...

“Peer-Review” is an Abused Credential

Page 59: Science Under Assault

Some Tricks to fool the trusting and the unwary...

“Peer-Review” is an Abused Credential

Page 60: Science Under Assault

Some Tricks to fool the trusting and the unwary...

“Peer-Review” is an Abused Credential

Page 61: Science Under Assault

“Peer-Review” is an Abused Credential

“The real mistake, of course, is to have thought that peer review was any more than a crude means of discovering the acceptability — not the validity — of a new finding.

“Editors and scientists alike insist on the pivotal importance of peer review. We portray peer review to the public as a quasi-sacred process that helps to make science our most objective truth teller. But we know that the system of peer review is biased, unjust, unaccountable, incomplete, easily fixed, often insulting, usually ignorant, occasionally foolish, and frequently wrong.”

—Richard Horton, editor of the British medical journal The Lancet

Some Tricks to fool the trusting and the unwary...

Page 62: Science Under Assault

“Peer-Review” is an Abused Credential

Some Tricks to fool the trusting and the unwary...

Page 63: Science Under Assault

4- Using Scientists to imply Scientificness.

Some Tricks to fool the trusting and the unwary...

Page 64: Science Under Assault

Is every priest a holy person?

Is every lawyer a law-abiding citizen?

Is every scientist a promoter of science?

Some Tricks to fool the trusting and the unwary...

Page 65: Science Under Assault

NO!

Some Tricks to fool the trusting and the unwary...

Page 66: Science Under Assault

There are tens of thousands of scientistswho are off the reservation!

This happens due to reasons like: 1) financial incentives (e.g. grants), 2) concerns for job security, 3) the influence of peer pressure, 4) interest in promoting a personal agenda, etc.

Some Tricks to fool the trusting and the unwary...

Page 67: Science Under Assault

When a Priest violates his profession —

he is defrocked.

Some Tricks to fool the trusting and the unwary...

Page 68: Science Under Assault

When a Lawyer violates his profession —

he is disbarred.

Some Tricks to fool the trusting and the unwary...

Page 69: Science Under Assault

When a Scientist violates his profession —

he is funded by advocacy groups.

Some Tricks to fool the trusting and the unwary...

Page 70: Science Under Assault

Some Tricks to fool the trusting and the unwary...

Unfortunately there are numerous indicators

that there are MANY scientists

who are not fulfilling their professional

obligations.

Page 71: Science Under Assault

Just because a scientist makes an assertion,does not make that claim scientific.

What makes a claim “scientific” is thatit has followed the Scientific Process.

A Report by Scientists ≠ a Scientific Report!

Some Tricks to fool the trusting and the unwary...

Page 72: Science Under Assault

Some Tricks to fool the trusting and the unwary...

Page 73: Science Under Assault

There IsNO SUCH THING

as“BAD SCIENCE”!

Some Tricks to fool the trusting and the unwary...

Page 74: Science Under Assault

5- Using Computer Models to imply Reality.

Some Tricks to fool the trusting and the unwary...

Page 75: Science Under Assault

Some Tricks to fool the trusting and the unwary...

1011011110011011010010100001000010100010001010001000100011011110010101000111010101000101110010010010101010001010001110100100111100101100100101010100001010101000101010010010101010001111010101010000001010101011100001010101010010100010101000101000101001000...

=?

Page 76: Science Under Assault

Some Tricks to fool the trusting and the unwary...

Page 77: Science Under Assault

Some Tricks to fool the trusting and the unwary...

Page 78: Science Under Assault

Some Tricks to fool the trusting and the unwary...

Page 79: Science Under Assault

Some Tricks to fool the trusting and the unwary...

Page 80: Science Under Assault

Some Tricks to fool the trusting and the unwary...

(continued)

Page 81: Science Under Assault

6- Using Selective Data to imply Actuality.

Some Tricks to fool the trusting and the unwary...

Page 82: Science Under Assault

Some Tricks to fool the trusting and the unwary...

Page 83: Science Under Assault

Seeing the WHOLE Picture is Critical.

Let’s Look at Some Graphsof Greenland Ice Core Temperatures.

Some Tricks to fool the trusting and the unwary...

Page 84: Science Under Assault

Graph #1: Last 600± Years

Conclusion: Things are Getting BAD

Some Tricks to fool the trusting and the unwary...

Greenland Ice Core Temperatures:

Page 85: Science Under Assault

Graph #2: Last 1,200± Years

Conclusion: Oh. Maybe it’s not really so bad.

Some Tricks to fool the trusting and the unwary...

Greenland Ice Core Temperatures:

Page 86: Science Under Assault

Graph #3: Last 5,000± Years

Conclusion: Wow. We’re really in GOOD shape.

Some Tricks to fool the trusting and the unwary...

Greenland Ice Core Temperatures:

Page 87: Science Under Assault

Graph #4: Last 10,000± Years

Conclusion: We’re actually at a LOW point.

Some Tricks to fool the trusting and the unwary...

Greenland Ice Core Temperatures:

Page 88: Science Under Assault

Graph #3: Last 5,000± Years

Will this make people afraid? Not Likely.

Some Tricks to fool the trusting and the unwary...

Greenland Ice Core Temperatures:

Page 89: Science Under Assault

Graph #2: Last 1,200± Years

Will this make people afraid? Doubt it.

Some Tricks to fool the trusting and the unwary...

Greenland Ice Core Temperatures:

Page 90: Science Under Assault

Graph #1: Last 600± YearsSome Tricks to fool the trusting and the unwary...

Greenland Ice Core Temperatures:

Will this make people afraid? Probably so!

Page 91: Science Under Assault

Seeing the WHOLE Picture is Critical.

Let’s Quickly Lookat Offshore Wind Energy Job Claims.

Some Tricks to fool the trusting and the unwary...

Page 92: Science Under Assault

Some Tricks to fool the trusting and the unwary...

The Sales Pitch:

Page 93: Science Under Assault

Some Tricks to fool the trusting and the unwary...

“Britain is leading the worldin building wind projects off its coastline…

but this has provided ‘negligible’work or services to UK companies.”

Offshore Wind JobsReality Check #1

Page 94: Science Under Assault

Some Tricks to fool the trusting and the unwary...

Offshore Wind JobsReality Check #2

“Even though a record ofnew capacity came online,

few jobs were created overall, and wind manufacturing

employment fell...”

Page 95: Science Under Assault

Some Tricks to fool the trusting and the unwary...

Offshore Wind JobsReality Check #3

Page 96: Science Under Assault

Some Tricks to fool the trusting and the unwary...

Conclusion:Net is 30,000

job-years lost!

Page 97: Science Under Assault

Conclusion:Net is $900± Million lost!

Some Tricks to fool the trusting and the unwary...

Page 98: Science Under Assault

7- Using PNS to imply better Science.

Some Tricks to fool the trusting and the unwary...

Page 99: Science Under Assault

Some Tricks to fool the trusting and the unwary...

Page 100: Science Under Assault

Some Tricks to fool the trusting and the unwary...

Post-Normal Science is a concept attempting to characterize a methodology of inquiry that is appropriate for cases where:

"facts are uncertain,values are in dispute,stakes are high, and

decisions are urgent."

“Post Normal Science” is bogus science.

Page 101: Science Under Assault

“Post Normal Science” is bogus science.

Some Tricks to fool the trusting and the unwary...

Page 102: Science Under Assault

“Post Normal Science” is bogus science.

Some Tricks to fool the trusting and the unwary...

Page 103: Science Under Assault

8- Using PP to imply Reasonableness.

Some Tricks to fool the trusting and the unwary...

Page 104: Science Under Assault

Some Tricks to fool the trusting and the unwary...

Page 105: Science Under Assault

Some Tricks to fool the trusting and the unwary...

“The Precautionary Principle allows regulatory agencies to shape and influence policy decisions that have little or no scientific substantiation.”

The Problems with Precaution:

A Principle Without Principle

Page 106: Science Under Assault

Some Tricks to fool the trusting and the unwary...

Page 107: Science Under Assault

Some Tricks to fool the trusting and the unwary...

Page 108: Science Under Assault

9- Using Engineering to Replace Science.

Some Tricks to fool the trusting and the unwary...

Page 109: Science Under Assault

Science:Proves principles

Engineering: Applies Proven principles

A Simplified Summary —

Some Tricks to fool the trusting and the unwary...

Page 110: Science Under Assault

This implies a proper sequence

Science —> Engineering

Some Tricks to fool the trusting and the unwary...

Page 111: Science Under Assault

What Happens WhenEngineering

gets ahead ofScience?

Some Tricks to fool the trusting and the unwary...

Page 112: Science Under Assault

the appropriate initial question is:

“SHOULD We Do This?”(i.e. does it make sense to do this?)

This looks at problems from a SCIENCE perspective.

When We Are Presented With Technical Options...

Some Tricks to fool the trusting and the unwary...

Page 113: Science Under Assault

The anti-science proponents have changed the initial question to:

“CAN We Do This?”This looks at problems from an ENGINEERING perspective.

Some Tricks to fool the trusting and the unwary...

Page 114: Science Under Assault

Of course the answer is always:

“Sure, We Can Do It!”

This change from a SCIENCE perspective to an ENGINEERING one,is a subtle but profound alteration.

The focus is then almost entirely on implementation, so almost no one really cares about the cost or sensibility.

Some Tricks to fool the trusting and the unwary...

Page 115: Science Under Assault

10-Claiming the mantle of Science— yet being anything but.

Some Tricks to fool the trusting and the unwary...

Page 116: Science Under Assault

Some Tricks to fool the trusting and the unwary...

Page 117: Science Under Assault

Some Tricks to fool the trusting and the unwary...

Page 118: Science Under Assault

Some Tricks to fool the trusting and the unwary...

Compare those articles to what actually happened:

a scientific critiquefrom some 30 international

sea level rise experts,where the words

“real estate” or “economics” are not even mentioned.

Page 119: Science Under Assault

Some Tricks to fool the trusting and the unwary...

Page 120: Science Under Assault

Some Tricks to fool the trusting and the unwary...

Page 121: Science Under Assault

Some Tricks to fool the trusting and the unwary...

Page 122: Science Under Assault

The reason that these agenda promotersuse ALL these tactics

is that they know thatReal Science is the biggest threat they face!

Some Tricks to fool the trusting and the unwary...

Page 123: Science Under Assault

Part 4:Assuring A Compliant Populace

Page 124: Science Under Assault
Page 125: Science Under Assault

¿No Comprende?

Page 126: Science Under Assault
Page 127: Science Under Assault

“Shut up, you moron! Do as you’ve been told.It’s for your own good!”

Wait a minute — something feels wrong

here!

Page 128: Science Under Assault

Avoid TeachingCritical Thinking.

Page 129: Science Under Assault

What Is

CriticalThinking?

A thorough, open-minded, logical effortto examine a claim,

in the light of applicable evidence.

One of the key ingredients of true science — and critical thinking — is

SKEPTICISM

Page 130: Science Under Assault
Page 131: Science Under Assault

“A lie told often enough becomes the truth...Give me four years to teach the children

and the seed I have sown will never be uprooted.”— Lenin

Page 132: Science Under Assault

Study: Many college studentsnot learning to think critically

Page 133: Science Under Assault

Diminish theImportance and Qualityof Science Education.

Page 134: Science Under Assault
Page 135: Science Under Assault
Page 136: Science Under Assault
Page 137: Science Under Assault

So What?One study concluded that a modest improvement

of US 15-year-olds’ education, would mean a $41 trillion increase in the US’s GDP.

Page 138: Science Under Assault

Diminish theQuality of Education,using Grade Inflation.

Page 139: Science Under Assault

Undergraduate Grade Point Average (GPA) at UNC Chapel Hill

Page 140: Science Under Assault
Page 141: Science Under Assault
Page 142: Science Under Assault
Page 143: Science Under Assault
Page 144: Science Under Assault

Guess What this Results in with Adults?

Page 145: Science Under Assault

Some Other Good

AcademicReform Ideas.

Page 146: Science Under Assault

We are being warned here about the consequences of our education policies

1 - We live in a society exquisitely dependent on science and technology — in which hardly anyone knows anything about science and technology.

2 - I am often amazed at how much more capability and enthusiasm for science there is among elementary school youngsters than among college students.

3 - We have arranged things so that almost no one understands science and technology. This is a prescription for disaster. We might get away with it for awhile, but sooner or later this combustible mixture of ignorance and power is going to blow up in our faces.

— Dr. Carl Sagan

Page 147: Science Under Assault

Exposed to Facts,the Misinformed Believe Lies More Strongly

Page 148: Science Under Assault

Part 5:Some NC Solutions

Page 149: Science Under Assault

“Since the waning years of the 20th century, politics has increasingly intruded on science. Scientific insights achieved through systematic, objective collection of data and empirical testing, have been subjected to political screening. Pioneering research findings that do not conform to political orthodoxy have too often been considered ‘politically incorrect’ and even attacked and censored.

“This trend has been particularly apparent in the fields of environmental science, where the stakes are very large. Respected scholars have been vilified when their research findings called into question the assumptions of ‘conventional wisdom’ and the agendas of powerful special interests.

...

A Superior Summary of the Situation

Page 150: Science Under Assault

“In the public arena, alarmist rhetoric over complicated issues has tended to drown out calm, rational discourse. Highly significant findings of great import have been ignored. Politicians and government regulators have made public policy decisions based upon false or fragmentary information.

“As a result, a host of unscientific, intrusive and counter-productive government policies have become commonplace, including takings of private property, bans of harmless substances, unwarranted liability court awards, byzantine bureaucratic controls, and regulatory measures that endanger economic growth, public health, and the environment.”

— The Independent Institute

A Superior Summary of the Situation (cont.)

Page 151: Science Under Assault
Page 152: Science Under Assault

1 - Carefully study ScienceUnderAssault.Info.

2 - Do what they can to see that the entire NC education system: a) aggressively teaches Critical Thinking, and b) prioritizes and promotes hard sciences.

3 - As a major step to defuse partisan politics (and get better results), see that all state technical policies are based on genuine science.

4 - Reach out to state-of-the-art companies that are developing science-based energy solutions, to locate in NC.

The NC Legislature should:

Page 153: Science Under Assault

North Carolina can be a Leader in:

1) Eighteenth century ideas like horse transportation and wind energy (buggy whip manufacturing, blacksmith and windmill jobs)

OR

2) State-of-the-art, Scientifically Sound energy solutions (like Geothermal Energy, Small Modular Reactors, etc.)

Page 154: Science Under Assault

A Sample Business that would be a Natural Fit for NC

Page 155: Science Under Assault

for Giving This MatterSome Critical Thought!

THANK YOU