Science, the Media and the Communication of Controversy & Risk
description
Transcript of Science, the Media and the Communication of Controversy & Risk
![Page 1: Science, the Media and the Communication of Controversy & Risk](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062521/56816628550346895dd98635/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Science, the Media and the Communication of Controversy & Risk
John R. Finnegan Jr., PhDProfessor & Dean
March 5, 2010 University of Manitoba
![Page 2: Science, the Media and the Communication of Controversy & Risk](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062521/56816628550346895dd98635/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Agenda
• Western culture, science & technology• Science & the media as social institutions• How the scientific agenda is set and how issues
are framed• InfoWar!• In the public interest…ways to improve
communication about science, risk
![Page 3: Science, the Media and the Communication of Controversy & Risk](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062521/56816628550346895dd98635/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Western culture and science
• Ambivalence• Drive for progress, innovation, knowledge• Religion, science as ways of viewing world• Intended outcomes• Unintended effects
– Cultural myths, frames, archetypes• Ancient: Pandora, Prometheus• Modern: Mary W. Shelley, H.G. Wells, Aldus Huxley
![Page 4: Science, the Media and the Communication of Controversy & Risk](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062521/56816628550346895dd98635/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Western culture and science
“Miracle” drugs, treatments– Valium; Prozac (SRIs); Anti-angiogenics
• Initially hailed; later assailed
Nuclear power– Our friend the atom…– Now about those used fuel rods…
Reporting of risk in general– Out of proportion (over and under)
![Page 5: Science, the Media and the Communication of Controversy & Risk](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062521/56816628550346895dd98635/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Western culture and science
Rev. Cotton Mather (Boston, 1750s)– Campaign for smallpox vaccination– Media opposition– Public confusion
• Would vaccination actually cause the disease?• Rich and powerful people want you to be
vaccinated, so watch out...
![Page 6: Science, the Media and the Communication of Controversy & Risk](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062521/56816628550346895dd98635/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
REAL headlines
Name that apocalyptic scourge...Lethal beef!
Turning cows to cannibalsMeat that rots the brain!
Link between rare human brain ailment, mysterious cow disease baffles scientists
The proof - experts say it could kill 500,000 of you
![Page 7: Science, the Media and the Communication of Controversy & Risk](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062521/56816628550346895dd98635/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Sociology
• Powerful social institutions• Organized, specialized, commercialized• Different work values & routines• Media build the public agenda• Science seeks to build the media’s
agenda, influence story frames• So do alternative advocacy groups
![Page 8: Science, the Media and the Communication of Controversy & Risk](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062521/56816628550346895dd98635/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
The Public Arenas Model
• Hilgartner & Bosk, 1988 AJS• Social institutions, groups, wrestle for
control of public discourse to identify social problems and frame them (e.g., as “harmful”)
• Media are key gatekeepers of public discourse• more fragmented in www
![Page 9: Science, the Media and the Communication of Controversy & Risk](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062521/56816628550346895dd98635/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
The Public Arenas Model
• Public attention is a scarce commodity for which social institutions, groups compete
• Level of attention devoted to a social problem is a function of its:– Objective make-up; plus its– Collective definition
![Page 10: Science, the Media and the Communication of Controversy & Risk](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062521/56816628550346895dd98635/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Public Arenas Model
Factors influencing collective definition...Carrying capacity of public arenas
– Media outlets; legislative committees, etc.Dynamics of competitionPrinciples of selection (culture, drama, etc.)FeedbackCommunities of operatives
![Page 11: Science, the Media and the Communication of Controversy & Risk](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062521/56816628550346895dd98635/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Values & work conditions
Scientists– Empirical; methodical; seek consistency;
incremental advances; high tolerance for ambiguity; consensus; long-term effort; highly technically trained; oriented to other scientists; operate in different organizational contexts but usually professional, autonomous.
![Page 12: Science, the Media and the Communication of Controversy & Risk](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062521/56816628550346895dd98635/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Values & work conditions
Journalists– News values (novelty, conflict, anomaly,
immediacy, sensation); Low tolerance for ambiguity; deadline-oriented, short term; general training; accuracy; fairness; oriented to the public; professional but highly controlled behavior.
![Page 13: Science, the Media and the Communication of Controversy & Risk](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062521/56816628550346895dd98635/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Communicating risk
Objectivist view– In identifying public issues, risk should be
characterized scientifically, empirically, methodically
Constructivist view– Risk is a product of different perceptions and
is communicated in the context of political & social values surrounding an issue, hazard or risk factor
![Page 14: Science, the Media and the Communication of Controversy & Risk](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062521/56816628550346895dd98635/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Communicating risk
• Scientists often work in objectivist frame of reference, but they have values and opinions, too.
• Journalists often work in a constructivist frame or reference (also the public)
• Value systems and beliefs play a role in framing science, issues, risks
![Page 15: Science, the Media and the Communication of Controversy & Risk](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062521/56816628550346895dd98635/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Some ways to improve...
• Overall• Journalists need training in science• Scientists need training in
communication• Partnerships between science and the
media in educating the public
![Page 16: Science, the Media and the Communication of Controversy & Risk](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062521/56816628550346895dd98635/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Some ways to improve…
http://www.psandman.com/
![Page 17: Science, the Media and the Communication of Controversy & Risk](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062521/56816628550346895dd98635/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Badscience.net
![Page 18: Science, the Media and the Communication of Controversy & Risk](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062521/56816628550346895dd98635/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Bad science reporting
Best Medical Blog 2009
![Page 19: Science, the Media and the Communication of Controversy & Risk](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062521/56816628550346895dd98635/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
![Page 20: Science, the Media and the Communication of Controversy & Risk](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062521/56816628550346895dd98635/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
What kind of risk am I?
Risk that an individual will get a certain disease or condition over a defined period of time– ABSOLUTE
Ratio of the chance of disease in individuals exposed to a risk factor compared to risk in individuals without exposure– RELATIVE (Robert Jeffery, 1989)
![Page 21: Science, the Media and the Communication of Controversy & Risk](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062521/56816628550346895dd98635/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
What kind of risk am I?
Number of excess cases of a disease or condition in a population that can be attributed to a risk factor– POPULATION-ATTRIBUTABLE
(Robert Jeffery, 1989)
![Page 22: Science, the Media and the Communication of Controversy & Risk](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062521/56816628550346895dd98635/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Some ways to improve...
• Day-to-day communication about risk– Consider “outrage” factors– Feelings about risk are important; people
are seldom persuaded by numbers they don’t understand
– Be open; engage people– “Risk” may not be the real issue– What do people want to know?
![Page 23: Science, the Media and the Communication of Controversy & Risk](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062521/56816628550346895dd98635/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Some ways to improve...
• Day-to-Day– Provide a frame for understanding risk– Acknowledge uncertainty– Communities and individuals determine
what is acceptable risk for them
![Page 24: Science, the Media and the Communication of Controversy & Risk](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062521/56816628550346895dd98635/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Reporting science, risk
1. What is the probability that people might be harmed and to what degree?
2. What are the assumptions underlying the assessment of risk? How is the risk assessment qualified or limited?
Source: Northwestern U, Medill School of Journalism
![Page 25: Science, the Media and the Communication of Controversy & Risk](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062521/56816628550346895dd98635/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Reporting science, risk
3. What are the study’s limitations overall? What does the study NOT say?
4. If there is uncertainty in the data, do the conclusions reflect that?
5. Does the study consider the number of people exposed to the problem?
Source: Northwestern U, Medill School of Journalism
![Page 26: Science, the Media and the Communication of Controversy & Risk](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062521/56816628550346895dd98635/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Reporting science, risk
6. Does the study distinguish between voluntary and involuntary exposure?
7. Are such elements as individual sensitivities, exposures to multiple hazards and cumulative effects considered?
Source: Northwestern U, Medill School of Journalism
![Page 27: Science, the Media and the Communication of Controversy & Risk](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062521/56816628550346895dd98635/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Reporting science, risk
8. Are the scientific data open to public scrutiny?
9. How separate is the research process from the policy-making process?
10. Who paid for the study?
Source: Northwestern U, Medill School of Journalism
![Page 28: Science, the Media and the Communication of Controversy & Risk](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062521/56816628550346895dd98635/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
H1N1 vaccine story
08-17-2009, CBS Early Show
![Page 29: Science, the Media and the Communication of Controversy & Risk](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062521/56816628550346895dd98635/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
![Page 30: Science, the Media and the Communication of Controversy & Risk](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062521/56816628550346895dd98635/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
![Page 31: Science, the Media and the Communication of Controversy & Risk](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062521/56816628550346895dd98635/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
When Ideologic Worlds Collide
• InfoWar!• Titanic battles to control the story frame
among the ideologically polarized, the scientifically self-righteous, and the politically naïve.
• “The first casualty when war comes, is truth.” US Sen. Hiram Johnson, 1917
![Page 32: Science, the Media and the Communication of Controversy & Risk](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062521/56816628550346895dd98635/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
ClimateGateand the Hockey Stick
Source: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) of the UNEP
![Page 33: Science, the Media and the Communication of Controversy & Risk](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062521/56816628550346895dd98635/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
ClimateGate
CBS Evening News, 12-09-2009
![Page 34: Science, the Media and the Communication of Controversy & Risk](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062521/56816628550346895dd98635/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
The Fallout
• Saudi Arabian climate negotiator: "It appears from the details of the scandal that there is no relationship whatsoever between human activities and climate change.”
• Canada Free Press: stolen files proof of a "deliberate fraud" and "the greatest deception in history.”
• Mother Jones: “…tempest in a teacup…”Source: FactCheck.org
![Page 35: Science, the Media and the Communication of Controversy & Risk](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062521/56816628550346895dd98635/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Google “Hits” (millions)
ClimateGate Copenhagen Conference Global Warming0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
2.4
11.5
30.3
March 3, 2010
![Page 36: Science, the Media and the Communication of Controversy & Risk](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062521/56816628550346895dd98635/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
ClimateGate
11-09-2009, CNBC
![Page 37: Science, the Media and the Communication of Controversy & Risk](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062521/56816628550346895dd98635/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
The Fallout
• There is a 20-year-old worldwide conspiracy among politically liberal climate scientists to perpetrate a huge scientific fraud
• The essence of the fraud: that human activity is causing unprecedented global warming potentially threatening to all life on the planet. We need to reduce the emissions causing it
• The emails and documents prove the existence of the conspiracy and the fraud
![Page 38: Science, the Media and the Communication of Controversy & Risk](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062521/56816628550346895dd98635/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
FactCheck™
• “Messages show scientists behaving badly...”
• Even excluding the evidence at the heart of this controversy, “…still plenty of evidence that the earth is getting warmer and that humans are largely responsible.”
http://www.factcheck.org/2009/12/climategate/
![Page 39: Science, the Media and the Communication of Controversy & Risk](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062521/56816628550346895dd98635/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
FactCheck™
• “E-mails being cited as "smoking guns" have been misrepresented…”
• “For instance, one e-mail that refers to "hiding the decline" isn’t talking about a decline in actual temperatures as measured at weather stations. These have continued to rise, and 2009 may turn out to be the fifth warmest year ever recorded. The "decline" actually refers to a problem with recent data from tree rings.”
http://www.factcheck.org/2009/12/climategate/
![Page 40: Science, the Media and the Communication of Controversy & Risk](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062521/56816628550346895dd98635/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
ClimateGate
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/series/climate-wars-hacked-emails
![Page 41: Science, the Media and the Communication of Controversy & Risk](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062521/56816628550346895dd98635/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
ClimateGate
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/series/climate-wars-hacked-emails
![Page 42: Science, the Media and the Communication of Controversy & Risk](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062521/56816628550346895dd98635/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
ClimateGate
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/series/climate-wars-hacked-emails
![Page 43: Science, the Media and the Communication of Controversy & Risk](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062521/56816628550346895dd98635/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
ClimateGate
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/series/climate-wars-hacked-emails
![Page 44: Science, the Media and the Communication of Controversy & Risk](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062521/56816628550346895dd98635/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
ClimateGate
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/series/climate-wars-hacked-emails
![Page 45: Science, the Media and the Communication of Controversy & Risk](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062521/56816628550346895dd98635/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
Some Conclusions
• Science is not “value-free”• Science can be a “…blood sport…”
when it intersects with deeply held beliefs or values (just ask Galileo) or deeply rooted economic interests that are change-averse
Stephen J. Dubner, Freakonomics, NY Times
![Page 46: Science, the Media and the Communication of Controversy & Risk](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062521/56816628550346895dd98635/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
21st Century Challenges
• 20th Century: Age of Information• Scarcity: Where to find it?
• 21st Century: Age of Information Super-abundance• Super-abundance: How to separate wheat
from chaff? • Caught in the middle: The Public
![Page 47: Science, the Media and the Communication of Controversy & Risk](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062521/56816628550346895dd98635/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
21st Century Challenges
• Serious potential for public loss of confidence and support for science
• When ideology replaces science• Needed: tools for superabundant
information• Both science and the media!