Science Online 2012: Writing for Robots

12
William Gunn Head of Academic Outreach [email protected] @mrgunn Writing for Robots Getting your research noticed in the age of algorithms

Transcript of Science Online 2012: Writing for Robots

Page 1: Science Online 2012: Writing for Robots

William GunnHead of Academic [email protected]

@mrgunn

Writing for Robots

Getting your research noticed in the age of algorithms

Page 2: Science Online 2012: Writing for Robots
Page 3: Science Online 2012: Writing for Robots
Page 4: Science Online 2012: Writing for Robots

How do people find research?

10 of the 18+ methods don’t involve the publisher at all, including 3/4 of the top methods!

Page 5: Science Online 2012: Writing for Robots

Highly Tweeted articles are 11x more likely to be highly cited. (Eysenbach 2011) http://www.jmir.org/2011/4/e123/

The higher the impact factor, the more likely the research is to be retracted, partly due to intense competition.http://bjoern.brembs.net/news766.html.11

Impact Factor is negotiated by the journals and does not reflect actual citations!http://jcb.rupress.org/content/179/6/1091.fu

ll

http://www.plosmedicine.org/article/info:doi/

10.1371/journal.pmed.0030291

What matters is who is reading your work!

Page 6: Science Online 2012: Writing for Robots

Make your work available for discovery

Publishing:•provides RSS feeds•gives download stats•provides machine readable PDFs•Allows easy bookmarking on Mendeley or tweeting•Allows self-archiving

Writing:•Include DOIs where possible•Cite datasets•Include database identifiers•Link to raw data & make it available (possibly via sharing services)

Page 7: Science Online 2012: Writing for Robots
Page 8: Science Online 2012: Writing for Robots
Page 9: Science Online 2012: Writing for Robots
Page 10: Science Online 2012: Writing for Robots

Public Service Announcement

The government is making decisions on what you’re allowed to do

with your publications, mostly without taking input from you. They

have taken input, as well as millions of dollars in lobbying

contributions, from publishers such as Elsevier (anagram: evil seer)

There is a bill, supported by the Association of American Publishers

that will destroy Pubmed Central and prohibit federal agencies from

requiring that work published with their funds(taxpayer derived) from

being placed in public access repositories.

What you can do:

Read about it:

http://www.michaeleisen.org/blog/?p=807

http://poynder.blogspot.com/2012/01/can-aap-members-stay-neutral-

in-row.html

•Call your representative and let them know they’ll be held

responsible.

•Sign the petition: https://www.popvox.com/bills/us/112/hr3699/report

•Tell journals you won’t peer review for them if they support RWA

•https://docs.google.com/document/d/1p2X0nqY250kYVfVbmXT3OuG

dhKFif1JtdrOh3hQKy-g

Page 12: Science Online 2012: Writing for Robots

http://mnd.ly/scio12_mendeley

Here’s the signup form for a premium account upgrade:

Please don’t tweet, but feel free to share in-person.