Science-2013-799

download Science-2013-799

of 1

Transcript of Science-2013-799

  • 8/12/2019 Science-2013-799

    1/1www.sciencemag.org SCIENCE VOL 340 17 MAY 2013

    NEWS&ANALY

    CREDITS(TOPTOB

    OTTOM):MAXPLANCKINSTITUTE

    FOREVOLUTIONARYANTHROPOLOGY;BENCEVIOLA,

    MPI-EVA

    COLD SPRING HARBOR, NEW YORKIn

    2010, a girls pinkie bone from Denisova Cave

    in Siberia added a new branch to the human

    family tree. The bone was so well preserved

    that researchers could fully sequence its

    genome and glimpse the DNA of archaic peo-

    ple now called Denisovans (Science, 28 Janu-

    ary 2011, p. 392; 26 August 2011, p. 1084).

    Now, researchers have analyzed three more

    samples from that same cave using a power-

    ful new method that reveals ancient genomes

    in brilliant detail. One sample, a Neander-

    tal toe bone, has yielded a nearly complete,

    high-coverage genome of our closest cousins,

    paleogeneticist Svante Pbo from the Max

    Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropol-

    ogy in Leipzig, Germany, reported at a meet-ing here last week.*

    The analyses paint a complex

    picture of mingling among ancient

    human groups, Pbo reported. The

    data suggest inbreeding in Nean-

    dertals, a large Denisovan popula-

    tion, and mixing between Deniso-

    vans and an even earlier mystery

    species. Its wonderful; amazing,

    says Eric Lander, director of the

    Broad Institute in Cambridge, Mas-

    sachusetts. It opens up a vista on

    the past world.Neandertals, the closest known

    relatives to modern humans, ranged

    across Europe to western Asia

    from perhaps 300,000 years ago

    until about 30,000 years ago. Their

    overlap in time and space with our

    ancestors had fueled debate about whether

    the two species had interbred. Then, in 2010,

    Pbos group published a low-coverage

    sequence (1.3 copies on average) of DNA

    from three Neandertal bones from Croatia,

    which showed interbreeding: About 2% of

    the DNA in living people from outside Africa

    originally comes from Neandertals (Science,7 May 2010, pp. 680 and 710).

    That first Neandertal sequence was a huge

    accomplishment, as Neandertal DNA made

    up just a few percent of the DNA in the fos-

    sils, the rest being bacterial and other con-

    taminants. Since then, the Leipzig group has

    found ways to zero in on human genetic mate-

    rial and to get more from degraded ancient

    DNA by using a sequencing method that

    starts with single, rather than double, strands

    of DNA. The approach provided a startlingly

    detailed view of the Denisovan pinkie bone

    (Science, 31 August 2012, p. 1028).

    But this powerful technique had yet to be

    applied to Neandertals. So Pbo was thrilled

    when the DNA in the sample taken from the

    toe bone proved to be 60% Neandertal. The

    researchers were able to sequence each base

    50 times over, on averageenough cover-

    age to ensure the sequence is correct. This

    approach also provided low coverage of the

    genome from another fossil, a Neandertal

    babys rib, more than 50,000 years old, from a

    cave in Russias Caucasus region between the

    Caspian and Black seas.

    In a 10 p.m. talk to a full house, Pbo

    offered some surprising results from the toe

    bone. For long stretches, the DNA from each

    parental chromosome is closely matched,

    strongly suggesting that this Neandertal was

    the offspring of two first cousins, he said.

    Comparing the data with those from the fos-

    sils from Croatia and the Caucasus showed

    that these populations were fairly separatedfrom one another. The group also compared

    the chunks of Neandertal DNA found in liv-

    ing people with each of these three Nean-

    dertal samples. The closest match was with

    the Caucasus population, suggesting that

    interbreeding with our ancestors most likely

    occurred closer to that region.

    From the detailed genomes of both Nean-

    dertals and Denisovans, Pbo and Montgom-

    ery Slatkin of the University of California,

    Berkeley, estimated that 17% of the Deniso-

    van DNA was from the local Neandertals. An

    the comparison revealed another surprise

    Four percent of the Denisovan genome come

    from yet another, more ancient, human

    something unknown, Pbo reported.Get

    ting better coverage and more genomes, yo

    can start to see the networks of interaction

    in a world long ago, says David Kingsley, an

    evolutionary biologist at Stanford Universit

    in Palo Alto, California.

    With all the interbreeding, its more a net

    work than a tree, points out Carles Lalueza

    Fox, a paleogeneticist from the Institute o

    Evolutionary Biology in Barcelona, Spain

    Pbo hesitates to call Denisovans a distinc

    species, and the picture is getting more com

    plicated with each new genome.

    Pbos team also deciphered additiona

    Denisovan DNA, both nuclear and mitochon

    drial, from two teeth found in different layers i

    Denisova Cave. The nuclear DNA confirme

    that both teeth are Denisovan. But, surpris

    ingly, one tooth showed more than 80 mitochondrial DNA differences from

    both the other tooth and the pinki

    bone. These Denisovans, who live

    in the same cave at different times

    were as genetically diverse as tw

    living humans from different conti

    nents and more diverse than Nean

    dertals from throughout their range

    says Susanna Sawyer from Pbo

    lab. Such diversity implies that th

    Denisovans were a relativel

    large population that at som

    point may have outnumbereNeandertals, Pbo said.

    In addition, the genome

    are clarifying genetic change

    that underlie our own evolu

    tion. We will be able to know

    all the changes that are ances

    tral, Lalueza-Fox says. Pbo and his col

    leagues have lined up the chimp, moder

    human, Neandertal, and Denisovan genome

    to see whats unique to our species. The cat

    alog includes 31,000 single-base changes

    which led to 96 protein changes, and mor

    than 3000 changes in regulatory regions, a

    well as 125 small insertions and deletionsPbo reported.

    Peter Sudmant from the University o

    Washington, Seattle has already begun scan

    ning the Neandertal genome for uniquely

    human duplications and deletions. Its some

    thing we thought we would never be able t

    do, he says. Adds Kingsley: It will tak

    a long time to figure out the real causativ

    events and figure out what traits they contro

    but its a finite list.

    ELIZABETH PENNIS

    More Genomes From Denisova CaveShow Mixing of Early Human Groups

    H U M A N E V O L U T I O N

    A cave for all people. Denisova Cave inSiberia yielded a Neandertal toe bone (inset) aswell as fossils of a new group of humans calledthe Denisovans.

    *The Biology of Genomes, 7 to 11 May.

    Published by AAAS