School of Biotechnology & National Centre for Sensor Research 1 Better Enzymes for Biosensors...
-
Upload
laurence-peters -
Category
Documents
-
view
220 -
download
0
Transcript of School of Biotechnology & National Centre for Sensor Research 1 Better Enzymes for Biosensors...
1School of Biotechnology & National Centre for Sensor Research
Better Enzymes for Better Enzymes for BiosensorsBiosensors
Ciarán Ó’FágáinSchool of Biotechnology & National Centre for Sensor Research,
Dublin City University, Dublin 9, Ireland
Or, A Tale of Two Saucy Or, A Tale of Two Saucy Little PeroxidasesLittle Peroxidases
Or, Improving Proteins With New Tools & Old
2School of Biotechnology & National Centre for Sensor Research
Peroxidase
BiosensorsBiosensors
Bioremediation Diagnostics
Protein Engineering
Recombinant Protein Expression
Bioinformatics
Biocatalysis
Transgenics Therapeutics
3School of Biotechnology & National Centre for Sensor Research
Signals from HRP/SBP Reactions
• Electrochemical
• Colorimetric
• Fluorimetric
• Luminescent
Fe 3+ HRP + H 2 O 2 Compound I + H 2 O
(resting) k 1 (Fe 4+ =O
+porphyrin cation radical)
A. AH
k 3 k 2 AH A.
k 4 Compound II Compound III
(Fe 4 + = O) (Fe 2+ .O 2 )
H 2 O 2 H 2 O
4School of Biotechnology & National Centre for Sensor Research
Protein Stabilization Strategies
TECHNIQUE NEEDS APPLICATIONS
MERITS
IMMOBILIZ’N Solid phase, Many links
Bioreactors,biosensors,diagnostics
Widely used,Many types of support
ADDITIVES Osmolytes, Excipients
Long-term storage
Effective, protein itself is unaltered
CHEMICAL MODIFICATION
“Old Tools”
Reagents, Crosslinkers
Many in vitro applications
Directly alters protein
PROTEIN ENGINEERING
“New Tools”
Cloned gene, GM expertise
Applications in vitro, in vivo
Permanently alters protein
5School of Biotechnology & National Centre for Sensor Research
Chemical Modification of HRP Lys
• EGNHS [Ethylene glycol bis-(succinimidyl succinate)]– Homobifunctional crosslinker– Spans up to 16 Å– Neutralizes +ve charge of Lys
• Acetic acid N-hydroxy succinimide ester– Non-crosslinking monofunctional– Acts like EGNHS
• Phthalic anhydride– Introduces bulky aromatic
group– Reverses +ve charge of Lys
6School of Biotechnology & National Centre for Sensor Research
Reaction of HRP Lysines with EGNHS
Lys174: ~20 % modified
Lys232: 100 % modified
Lys241: 80 % modified
Lys65 No
Lys84 significant
Lys149 modification
}Biotech Bioeng 2001
76: 277-284
Crosslink {
7School of Biotechnology & National Centre for Sensor Research
Our PelB-Wildtype rHRP-His6 Construct
pBR_I
4.4 Kb
• Recombinant HRP: Problems• Inclusion bodies
• Tricky to refold• Hyperglycosylation in yeast• Low yields from E. coli• 1999: Arnold describes soluble HRP recombinant• 2002: donation to DCU
8School of Biotechnology & National Centre for Sensor Research
Mutations to Probe / Increase HRP Stability
• Rationally designed mutationsRationally designed mutations based on our “prior art”:mutate Lys 174, 232 & 241, observe effects on stability.• (directed evolution study published but no previous SDM dealing with HRP stability)
• Semi-rational DesignSemi-rational Design: “Consensus Approach” to identify potential mutations.
• Compare amino acid sequences of related proteins to identify the ‘consensus’ amino acid at any position
• Postulate that the ‘consensus’ amino acid contributes more to stability than rarer ones.
• downloaded & aligned 100 plant peroxidase sequences
9School of Biotechnology & National Centre for Sensor Research
Rational HRP Mutant Selection
• Rational approach to mutation of key (+vely charged) Lys residues 174, 232, 241.
Ala (A) Small, non-polar
Asn, Gln (N, Q) Polar, uncharged
Glu (E) Charge reversal
Phe (F) Bulky, hydrophobic
10School of Biotechnology & National Centre for Sensor Research
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
t 1
/2 a
t 50
oC
(m
ins)
WT E N E A N NF A F Q K232F/K241NA
Lys 174
Lys 232
Lys 241
Double Lys
Compare Lysine Mutants’ t1/2 Values
11School of Biotechnology & National Centre for Sensor Research
Consensus Mutants Thermal Properties
MutantMutant tt½½ (min)
Wildtype 12.4
T102A 12.9
Q106R 8.1
Q107D 10.3
T110V 13.7
I180FCombined
10.78.8
kk (min-1)
0.056
0.054
0.085
0.068
0.051
0.065
0.078
?
12School of Biotechnology & National Centre for Sensor Research
Scarcely any differences!
• Very disappointing outcome– No improvements in thermal stability– No enhanced solvent tolerances– No catalytic differences
• At least, with ABTS substrate
– Why such poor results?• Literature shows that ‘consensus’ works for other enzymes• Alpha-helix scaffold seems conserved in plant peroxidases
•Try something else: oxidative stability–Excess H2O2 substrate (oxidant) can inactivate HRP
13School of Biotechnology & National Centre for Sensor Research
Consensus Mutant T110V - shows a 25x increase in H2O2 stability
- Unexpected bonus
C5
0 (
mM
)
0
5
10
15
20
400
410
420
430
T102A
Q107N
T110V
I180F
COMBO
WT
Q106R
14School of Biotechnology & National Centre for Sensor Research
C5
0 (%
v/v
)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
175
200
225
250
275
300
K174 K232 K241 K232/241E23
8
E23
9
N E A N E A F N E A F Q/Q N/N F/NQNWT
C50
(m
M)
ResultsH2O2 Stability, Rational Approach.
15School of Biotechnology & National Centre for Sensor Research
rHRP Directional Immobilization:Mutant Selection.
Method: Rational Approach.
• 21 Arg Residues in wt HRP
• Achieve directional immobilization by judicious residue selection?
Lys: Conservative sub’.
• number modifiable Lys.
Possible Arginine Residues.19, 27, 31, 38, 62, 75, 82, 93, 118, 123, 124, 153, 159, 178,
183, 206, 224, 264, 283, 298, 302.
Located in Helix19, 27, 38, 75, 82, 93, 123, 124, 153, 206, 264.
Located in Protein Core.31, 183, 298.
Similar Plane as Active Site Entrance.62, 178, 224, 302
Arginine Residues Selected for Mutation.118, 159 and 283
16School of Biotechnology & National Centre for Sensor Research
Directional rHRP Immobilization:Proof of Principle
Spot immobilization onto polyethersulfone membrane
30 pM HRP immobilized, DAB stained.
Wild Type
New Lys + Retain 232, 241
New Lys + Remove 232, 241
0 ⅓ 1
0
2 3 4 18
17School of Biotechnology & National Centre for Sensor Research
HRP .v. SBP
• HRP is moderately heat stable
• Chemical modification of HRP Lys increases heat stability & tolerance of solvent, pH extremes
• SBP is notably heat stable, moreso than HRP
• Attempts to further increase SBP heatstability by chemically modifying polypeptide yielded little– SBP lacks exactly those Lys
that are targets in HRP!
18School of Biotechnology & National Centre for Sensor Research
A Recurring Issue in Biosensors
• Electron transfer from enzyme active site to electrode can be inefficient & rate-limiting: may need to add external mediator (such as ferrocene) to bridge the distance.
• Sugars of glycoproteins can increase the enzyme-electrode distance: undesirable.– Use sugar-free recombinant proteins ex E. coli ?
• Why not alter protein so that it carries its Why not alter protein so that it carries its own ferrocene mediator?own ferrocene mediator?
19School of Biotechnology & National Centre for Sensor Research
Ferrocene carboxylic acid
• … is available & can be coupled to free –NH2 via carbodiimide BUT …
• SBP is poor in reactive –NH2, so need to add on extra –NH2 groups to enable attachment of ferrocene carboxylic acid (FCA)
• One possible way of doing this is to …
20School of Biotechnology & National Centre for Sensor Research
Chemically Modify SBP Carbohydrates
21School of Biotechnology & National Centre for Sensor Research
Ferrocenylation of SBP
(n = 3)
Enzyme Activity (%)
Protein (g/mL)
No. free –NH2
Iron (ppb)
Native SBP 100 439 34 3 0.5 49 8
Aminated SBP
128 14 234 24 35 6 52 8
FCA-SBP 67 14 238 38 3 0.9 138 14
22School of Biotechnology & National Centre for Sensor Research
CVs of bare electrode .v. both SBPs
-12.5
-10.0
-7.5
-5.0
-2.5
0.0
2.5
5.0
7.5
10.0
0.10.20.30.40.50.60.7
Potential (V), vs Ag/AgCl
Cur
rent
(nA
mp)
.
•Innermost curve (purple): No SBP in electrode cavity
•Middle curve (black): native SBP
•Outermost curve (red): FCA-SBP.
23School of Biotechnology & National Centre for Sensor Research
Native .v. Ferrocenylated SBP
Current response of native (lower curve) & ferrocenylated SBP to successive injections 2.5mol H2O2. (Electrode poised at -0.100 V.)
24School of Biotechnology & National Centre for Sensor Research
Summary Conclusions – HRP & SBP Chemical modification can increase HRP thermal stabilityChemical modification can increase HRP thermal stability
but not that of SBP
Chem Mod (CM) CANCAN improve SBP’s biosensor properties, however
Genetic manipulation (GM) is also powerful …Genetic manipulation (GM) is also powerful …
Single substitutions increase HRP resistance to excess H2O2 …
… while other mutations permit its orientated immobilization.
So, both old (CM) & new (GM) tools can make these So, both old (CM) & new (GM) tools can make these biosensor-friendly enzymes better for biosensorsbiosensor-friendly enzymes better for biosensors
25School of Biotechnology & National Centre for Sensor Research
Detailed Conclusions - rHRP
• HRP mutants K232F, K232N, K232F/K241N show modest increase in stability to heat (at 50oC)
• Consensus mutant T110V & Lys mutants K232N, K241F, K232N/K241F, K232N/K241N are notably more tolerant of H2O2 than wild type– Increased oxidative/ chemical stability
• Can achieve orientated/ directional immobilization of HRP by mutations R118K/R153K/R283K – (plus K232N/K241F)
26School of Biotechnology & National Centre for Sensor Research
Detailed SBP Conclusions• SBP deposited in microcavity etched at tip of a Pt micro electrode can perform direct, mediator-free electron transfer
• Can covalently bind ferrocene (FCA) mediator to SBP glycans
• ~1.5 ferrocenes/SBP molecule, effective even with crude SBP
Bioconjugate Chem (2007) 18: 524-529
FCA-SBP outperforms native SBP in etched Pt electrode
Enzyme-electrode electron transfer rate increases >10X
FCA-SBP is ~3.5X more sensitive than native SBP.
Linear current response to injected [H2O2] betw. 2.5 < [H2O2] < 42.5 M.
These microcavity sensors have potential as reagentless electrodes to measure H2O2 & other analytes that act as electron donors for peroxidases
27School of Biotechnology & National Centre for Sensor Research
2008 Biochimie 90: 1414-1421. 2008 Biochimie 90: 1389-1396. 2007 BMC Biotechnology 7: 86.2007 Biochimie 89: 1029-1032. 2007 Bioconjugate Chem 18: 524-529.2006 Patent Application EP 06394027.4 2006 Trends Biotech 24: 355-363.
Recent HRP/ SBP publicationsRecent HRP/ SBP publications
http://doras.dcu.ie/view/people/=D3=27F=E1g=E1in,_Ciar=E1n.htmlhttp://doras.dcu.ie/view/people/=D3=27F=E1g=E1in,_Ciar=E1n.html
28School of Biotechnology & National Centre for Sensor Research
Acknowledgments – GM work• Materials
– FH Arnold, Caltech, USA (HRP gene)
• Finance & Personnel– IRCSET* & DCU RAP Pgrad Award (Barry
Ryan) – DCU RAP Albert College Award (CÓF)
• Advice & Expertise– Drs P Clarke, P Leonard, P Ó Cuív, P-R Vaas,
C Viguier, J Finlay, S Hearty*Irish Research Council for Science, Engineering & Technology
29School of Biotechnology & National Centre for Sensor Research
Acknowledgments – CM work• Personnel
– Orlaith Ryan Enzyme Microb Tech (1994) 16: 501-505
– Enda Miland Enzyme Microb Tech (1996) 19: 63-67
– Anne-Marie O’Brien Biotech Bioeng (2003) 81: 233-240
– Neil Carolan Bioconjugate Chem (2007) 18: 524-529
• Finance– Amersham Intl, British Council, Dublin City Univ, EC
Framework 4 (BIO-CT97-2031), Eolas, Fingal County Council.
• Advice & Expertise– AT Smith, KG Welinder, PF Nielsen, MR Smyth (HRP) – RJ Forster (SBP electrochemistry)
30School of Biotechnology & National Centre for Sensor Research
Acknowledgments
• Emerging Technologies Conference Organizers– UMASS Lowell hosts
• You, the Audience– Thank you for your attention