School Level Planning Session #2 – December 5 , 2012 Make-Up Session – January 4, 2013
description
Transcript of School Level Planning Session #2 – December 5 , 2012 Make-Up Session – January 4, 2013
![Page 1: School Level Planning Session #2 – December 5 , 2012 Make-Up Session – January 4, 2013](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813980550346895da11371/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
11
School Level Planning
Session #2 – December 5 , 2012Make-Up Session – January 4, 2013
Intermediate Unit 1Instructional Support Services
![Page 2: School Level Planning Session #2 – December 5 , 2012 Make-Up Session – January 4, 2013](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813980550346895da11371/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Today’s Agenda
Review Locally Generated Data Sources p. 14
Identify Accomplishments & Concerns p. 16
Analyze 14 School Level Systems & School Level Guiding Questions to identify challenges p. 20-26
Prioritize Systemic Challenges p. 28
![Page 3: School Level Planning Session #2 – December 5 , 2012 Make-Up Session – January 4, 2013](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813980550346895da11371/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
ANALYZE SYSTEMSANALYZE SYSTEMS
IDENTIFY SYSTEMIC
CHALLENGES
IDENTIFY SYSTEMIC
CHALLENGESPRIORITIZE SYSTEMIC
CHALLENGES
PRIORITIZE SYSTEMIC
CHALLENGES
SELECT RESEARCH-
BASED PRACTICES
SELECT RESEARCH-
BASED PRACTICES
DESIGN AND IMPLEMENT
ACTION PLANS
DESIGN AND IMPLEMENT
ACTION PLANS
MONITOR IMPLEMEN-
TATION
MONITOR IMPLEMEN-
TATION
DETERMINE EFFECTIVE-
NESS
DETERMINE EFFECTIVE-
NESS
ANALYZE DATA
ANALYZE DATA
The Getting ResultsContinuous Improvement
Process
TO IDENTIFY THE SCHOOL’S STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND
CONCERNS
THAT ARE PROBABLE CAUSES OF INSUFFICIENT STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT
BASED UPON THOSE CHALLENGES, IF
ADDRESSED, THAT WILL HAVE THE MOST
SIGNIFICANT IMPACT UPON STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT
TO IMPLEMENT AND SUSTAIN RESEARCH-BASED PRACTICES
OF ACTION PLANS USING SCHOOL-IDENTIFIED
INDICATORS (EVIDENCE) OF IMPLEMENTATION
OF ACTION PLANS USING SCHOOL-IDENTIFIED
INDICATORS (EVIDENCE) OF EFFECTIVENESS
THAT HAVE A HIGH PROBABILITY OF DIMINISHING OR
ELIMINATING SYSTEMIC CHALLENGES
BY COMPARING THE SYSTEMS IN THE SCHOOL
TO SYSTEMS CHARACTERISTIC OF EFFECTIVE SCHOOLS
![Page 4: School Level Planning Session #2 – December 5 , 2012 Make-Up Session – January 4, 2013](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813980550346895da11371/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Analyze Data
Locally Relevant Data and System Analysis1. Review the 14 Systems in Schools statements.
(p.15)
2. Analyze prepopulated data.
3. Identify specific sources of locally generated data that can inform the 14 Systems in Schools. (p.14) These could include: demographics, perceptions, contextual and achievement data.
4. Be specific in listing data categories yielded from a source.
5. For each data source, identify for which system(s) the source will yield relevant data.
![Page 5: School Level Planning Session #2 – December 5 , 2012 Make-Up Session – January 4, 2013](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813980550346895da11371/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Data Categories
Demographic Perceptions
Drop Out RatesAttendance RatesSubgroups/Special PopulationsLanguage ProficiencyMobility Rates
School Climate SurveysTitle I SurveysStaff/Parent/Student SurveysClimate and Culture SurveysFocus Groups
Contextual Achievement
Academic Programs PSSACourses National Normed Achievement TestsLesson Plans, Curriculum Local AssessmentsProfessional Development End of Grade Common AssessmentsStudent Support Programs 4Sight Benchmarks
![Page 6: School Level Planning Session #2 – December 5 , 2012 Make-Up Session – January 4, 2013](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813980550346895da11371/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Additional Local Data Sources
PSAT, SAT, AP Professional Development
Evaluations Title I Needs Assessments Common Grade
Level/Course Assessments Attendance, Tardiness, &
Discipline Records Tutoring Records
Class/Course Grades
IEP, ELL, ED, and Other Subgroup Records
![Page 7: School Level Planning Session #2 – December 5 , 2012 Make-Up Session – January 4, 2013](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813980550346895da11371/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Additional Local Data Sources
What other sources did you list that have not been shown or mentioned
![Page 8: School Level Planning Session #2 – December 5 , 2012 Make-Up Session – January 4, 2013](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813980550346895da11371/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
14
Data Source
Data Category
System
#
How does the data source relate to the system #?
![Page 9: School Level Planning Session #2 – December 5 , 2012 Make-Up Session – January 4, 2013](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813980550346895da11371/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Group Talk
How does the data source relate to the system # you identified?
![Page 10: School Level Planning Session #2 – December 5 , 2012 Make-Up Session – January 4, 2013](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813980550346895da11371/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Analyze Data
C. Identification of Student Accomplishments and Concerns
After reviewing prepopulated and locally generated data, identify results that represent student achievement and/or performance accomplishments and concerns.
Prioritize items before entering them in the appropriate table.
p. 16
![Page 11: School Level Planning Session #2 – December 5 , 2012 Make-Up Session – January 4, 2013](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813980550346895da11371/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Examples of Achievements & Concerns
AccomplishmentThe All Student Group in all grades met or
exceeded the standard for PA academic growth for Reading.
ConcernNo relevant subgroup met the 67% Math target.
IEP subgroup was 32.4% prof./adv., ED subgroup was 48.6% prof./adv., and the white subgroup was 59.5% prof./adv.
![Page 12: School Level Planning Session #2 – December 5 , 2012 Make-Up Session – January 4, 2013](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813980550346895da11371/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Examples of Achievements & Concerns
Accomplishment
86% of 7th grade projected to 8th grade have a 70% or greater probability of reaching proficiency.
Concern The achievement gap in Reading has
increased each of the past 3 years between every subgroup and the Students Overall group.
![Page 13: School Level Planning Session #2 – December 5 , 2012 Make-Up Session – January 4, 2013](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813980550346895da11371/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
p. 16
![Page 14: School Level Planning Session #2 – December 5 , 2012 Make-Up Session – January 4, 2013](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813980550346895da11371/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
QuestionsQuestions
![Page 15: School Level Planning Session #2 – December 5 , 2012 Make-Up Session – January 4, 2013](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813980550346895da11371/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
09000 01 87654321590 04 98765432103 9876543210987654321021 987654321098765432100Hours Minutes Seconds
10 Minute Break
BREAK TIME!
![Page 16: School Level Planning Session #2 – December 5 , 2012 Make-Up Session – January 4, 2013](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813980550346895da11371/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
p. 17
Why do you think these concerns
and accomplishments exist?
![Page 17: School Level Planning Session #2 – December 5 , 2012 Make-Up Session – January 4, 2013](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813980550346895da11371/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Why do you think these accomplishments and
concerns exist?
![Page 18: School Level Planning Session #2 – December 5 , 2012 Make-Up Session – January 4, 2013](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813980550346895da11371/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
LUNCHLUNCH
11:30 - 12:1511:30 - 12:15
![Page 19: School Level Planning Session #2 – December 5 , 2012 Make-Up Session – January 4, 2013](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813980550346895da11371/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
![Page 20: School Level Planning Session #2 – December 5 , 2012 Make-Up Session – January 4, 2013](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813980550346895da11371/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Systemic Change
Thinking and focusing on the whole system
Thinking beyond individual problems and single solutions
![Page 21: School Level Planning Session #2 – December 5 , 2012 Make-Up Session – January 4, 2013](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813980550346895da11371/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Systemic Challenges
Provide an opportunity for schools to confront systemic deficiencies, what may be a cause of insufficient student achievement and/or performance which fails to meet school, district, community, and/or Pennsylvania and /or Federal Department of Education.
![Page 22: School Level Planning Session #2 – December 5 , 2012 Make-Up Session – January 4, 2013](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813980550346895da11371/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Systemic Challenges
Focus on the school as an entire system, which is composed of component systems, each of which interacts and influences all other component systems.
Consider how potential interventions for a component system will influence the capacity of the complex system (school) to positively impact student achievement.
![Page 23: School Level Planning Session #2 – December 5 , 2012 Make-Up Session – January 4, 2013](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813980550346895da11371/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Systemic Change
Systemic change is a process in which the impact of change on all parts of the whole and their relationship to one another are taken into consideration.
![Page 24: School Level Planning Session #2 – December 5 , 2012 Make-Up Session – January 4, 2013](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813980550346895da11371/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Systemic Focus
ComprehensivePlanning – School Level Planning requires schools to analyze 14 systems found in schools to determine which system(s) might be strengthened to impact and improve student achievement and performance overall.
![Page 25: School Level Planning Session #2 – December 5 , 2012 Make-Up Session – January 4, 2013](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813980550346895da11371/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Systems
Systems Analysis
School Level Guiding Questions
![Page 26: School Level Planning Session #2 – December 5 , 2012 Make-Up Session – January 4, 2013](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813980550346895da11371/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Analyze Systems
Review the 14 School Level Guiding Questions and related characteristics of effective schools.
Types of systems in schools that are analyzed: Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment Student Focused Professional Development Administrative/Management
Discuss evidence to support a school’s answer to whether or not the system is in place.
How do you know you do that?
p. 20-26
![Page 27: School Level Planning Session #2 – December 5 , 2012 Make-Up Session – January 4, 2013](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813980550346895da11371/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
20
![Page 28: School Level Planning Session #2 – December 5 , 2012 Make-Up Session – January 4, 2013](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813980550346895da11371/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Identify Systemic Challenges
Identify the systemic challenges that are probable causes of insufficient student achievement by responding YES or NO to the 14 School Level Guiding Questions and the corresponding characteristics/descriptions below each Guiding Question.
pp. 20-25
![Page 29: School Level Planning Session #2 – December 5 , 2012 Make-Up Session – January 4, 2013](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813980550346895da11371/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
2929
Comprehensive Planning
Is there a system within the school that fully ensures consistent implementation of standards-aligned curricula across all classrooms for all students?
The curricula for all courses and content areas clearly delineate what students are supposed to know and be able to do, i.e. there are written competencies for all courses.
The curricula for all courses and content areas for which related State Standards have been established are aligned with those State Standards
Teachers across all classrooms consistently base lesson design on the competencies included in the established curricula.
(and continuing…)
NO
![Page 30: School Level Planning Session #2 – December 5 , 2012 Make-Up Session – January 4, 2013](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813980550346895da11371/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Systems Analysis – Diagnostic vs Evaluation
Guiding Questions and System Characteristics analysis is a diagnostic process intended to identify the nature or cause of something.
The analysis is not an evaluation process intended to judge the relative value of something.
If a System Characteristic is not checked, you are indicating that there is deficiency that is keeping the school from fully implementing an effective system.
![Page 31: School Level Planning Session #2 – December 5 , 2012 Make-Up Session – January 4, 2013](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813980550346895da11371/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
SLGQ #8
SystemAnalysisProcess
![Page 32: School Level Planning Session #2 – December 5 , 2012 Make-Up Session – January 4, 2013](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813980550346895da11371/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Turn and Talk
As a team, share and note possible
EVIDENCE (Yes-No)
to consider when analyzing the
School Level Guiding Questions
![Page 33: School Level Planning Session #2 – December 5 , 2012 Make-Up Session – January 4, 2013](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813980550346895da11371/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Prioritize Systemic Challenges
Prioritize the identified challenges that if addressed will have the most significant impact on student achievement. (Note that questions are now restated as statements.)
Up to 4 highest priority Systemic Challenges can be the focus of Actions Plans – however, only 2 are recommended for manageability.
p. 28
![Page 34: School Level Planning Session #2 – December 5 , 2012 Make-Up Session – January 4, 2013](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813980550346895da11371/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Prioriti
ze
p. 28
![Page 35: School Level Planning Session #2 – December 5 , 2012 Make-Up Session – January 4, 2013](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813980550346895da11371/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
3535
Comprehensive Planning
Systemic Challenges Become Goals Is there a system within the school that fully ensures consistent implementation of standards-aligned curricula across all classrooms for all students?
Is there a system within the school that fully ensures school staff members use standards-aligned assessments to monitor student achievement and adjust instructional practices?
Is there a system within the school that fully ensures professional development is focused, strategic and implemented with fidelity?
Establish a system within the school that fully ensures consistent implementation of standards-aligned curricula across all classrooms for all students.
Establish a system within the school that fully ensures school staff members use standards-aligned assessments to monitor student achievement and adjust instructional practices.
Establish a system within the school that fully ensures professional development is focused, strategic and implemented with fidelity.
![Page 36: School Level Planning Session #2 – December 5 , 2012 Make-Up Session – January 4, 2013](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813980550346895da11371/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
QuestionsQuestions
![Page 37: School Level Planning Session #2 – December 5 , 2012 Make-Up Session – January 4, 2013](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813980550346895da11371/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Preparing for Session #3
Know that you are developing a school improvement plan with a 2 year duration – 2013-2014 and 2014-2015 school terms.
Give careful attention to the System Characteristics within the 14 Guiding Questions-the Characteristics not present are deficiencies that should be addressed in Action Plans that are part of System Goals
![Page 38: School Level Planning Session #2 – December 5 , 2012 Make-Up Session – January 4, 2013](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813980550346895da11371/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Preparing for Session #3
All deficiencies and Action Plans must be totally aligned with your Systemic Challenges (Goals)
As you further identify and prioritize your Systemic Challenges, give careful consideration to which Challenges (Goals) are doable, manageable, and achievable in your 2-year plan.
If you are in a Phase 2 District, you should be communicating your systemic challenges to the district Comprehensive Plan leaders.
![Page 39: School Level Planning Session #2 – December 5 , 2012 Make-Up Session – January 4, 2013](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813980550346895da11371/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Our next SIP session is January 10, 2013 Focus will be on Action Planning