Scheme De-Risking: the Finance Director’s Cut

8
Scheme De-Risking: the Finance Director’s Cut CBI Pensions Conference 9 September 2010 François Barker International Department Head, Pensions, Hammonds LLP

description

 

Transcript of Scheme De-Risking: the Finance Director’s Cut

Page 1: Scheme De-Risking: the Finance Director’s Cut

Scheme De-Risking: the Finance Director’s Cut

CBI Pensions Conference 9 September 2010

François BarkerInternational Department Head, Pensions, Hammonds LLP

Page 2: Scheme De-Risking: the Finance Director’s Cut

A Suite of Practical Options

Changing / closing off accrual

Reducing investment risk

Reducing liabilities

Using non cash assets

The main issues to navigate round

Legal / financial implications

Page 3: Scheme De-Risking: the Finance Director’s Cut

Changing / Closing off Accrual

Aim: Stop further build up of liabilities + curtailment

gain for accounting

Issues:

Employee consultation - 30 to 90 days

Managing Section 75 risks

Contractual rights of employees

Scheme amendment powers / incentivised opt out

Getting / keeping trustees onside

Only tackles future risk

Page 4: Scheme De-Risking: the Finance Director’s Cut

Reducing Investment Risk

Aim: Minimise risk / volatility + preserve return expectations

to minimise impact on cash / P + L

Issues:

Buy in / buy out options

Cross-subsidy

Provider covenant vs sponsor covenant

Funding strain and premium: use non cash assets?

“Synthetic" assets - better diversification, returns and liability hedging

Review of buy in / buy out contracts and investment agreements

Page 5: Scheme De-Risking: the Finance Director’s Cut

Reducing Liabilities

Aim: Reduce absolute size of liabilities / gearing +

offer choices to former / legacy employees

Issues:

Enhanced Transfer Values

Need cash injection so impact on accounts

But may be other options

Pension Increase Swaps

Don’t need cash but move to CPI may make unnecessary?

Legal risks: misselling and Pensions Regulator, scheme rules, trustee

engagement and Pensions Act 1995

Page 6: Scheme De-Risking: the Finance Director’s Cut

Non Cash Assets

Aim: Conserve cash / unlock value of undervaluedassets / longer recovery plans

Issues:

Parent company guarantees and charges already well used

Now focus on intermediate funding vehicles

Company assets to produce income flow for pension scheme

Wide range of assets used (real property, IP, inter-company loans, physical assets)

Funding and security advantages – a genuine “win win”

Multiple legal, accounting, tax and valuation issues

Page 7: Scheme De-Risking: the Finance Director’s Cut

And don’t forget

RPI is likely to become CPI

Act now to preserve the ability to extract scheme surplus

Amend conflicts policies to addess the Bribery Act 2010

Transitional Finance Act 2004 rules expire April 2011

Default retirement age of 65 disappears April 2011

DC contracting out disappears April 2012

Page 8: Scheme De-Risking: the Finance Director’s Cut

Scheme De-Risking: the Finance Director’s Cut

CBI Pensions Conference 9 September 2010

François BarkerInternational Department Head, Pensions, Hammonds LLP