6th Annual Defeating IEDs Training Workshops and technology Exhibition
Scheduled Versus Event Driven Testing of Distribution Protection IEDs
description
Transcript of Scheduled Versus Event Driven Testing of Distribution Protection IEDs
![Page 1: Scheduled Versus Event Driven Testing of Distribution Protection IEDs](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062521/568166b6550346895ddabea0/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Scheduled Versus Event Driven Testing of Distribution Protection IEDs
Dr. Alexander Apostolov, Benton Vandiver, Will Knapek, OMICRON electronics
![Page 2: Scheduled Versus Event Driven Testing of Distribution Protection IEDs](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062521/568166b6550346895ddabea0/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Page: 2
Conventional Fault Clearing System
![Page 3: Scheduled Versus Event Driven Testing of Distribution Protection IEDs](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062521/568166b6550346895ddabea0/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Page: 3
Maintenance (Event-driven) Testing Requirements
– In case of events:– Incorrect protection system
operation–Failure to operate–Undesired operation–Testing requirements to:
• determine the reason for the maloperation
• confirm that a required corrective action has been successfully implemented
![Page 4: Scheduled Versus Event Driven Testing of Distribution Protection IEDs](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062521/568166b6550346895ddabea0/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Waveform Replay
![Page 5: Scheduled Versus Event Driven Testing of Distribution Protection IEDs](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062521/568166b6550346895ddabea0/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Fault Simulation
![Page 6: Scheduled Versus Event Driven Testing of Distribution Protection IEDs](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062521/568166b6550346895ddabea0/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Page: 6
Preventive Maintenance Testing Versus Monitoring–Care and servicing by company
personnel for the purpose of maintaining the components of the fault clearing system in satisfactory operating condition
–Systematic inspection and testing in order to determine problems with the relays or other system components and prevent their failure to operate when necessary.
![Page 7: Scheduled Versus Event Driven Testing of Distribution Protection IEDs](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062521/568166b6550346895ddabea0/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Page: 7
Preventive Maintenance Testing Versus Monitoring–Risks such as equipment failure or
human errors that may lead to problems bigger than the eventual benefit from scheduled testing
–Significant number of monitoring functions available in advanced multifunctional protection intelligent electronic devices
![Page 8: Scheduled Versus Event Driven Testing of Distribution Protection IEDs](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062521/568166b6550346895ddabea0/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Page: 8
Existing SystemsIt’s time to re-evaluate the fault clearing system to optimize the test process as new technologies are integrated. Areas to consider:
–CT and VT circuit supervision –CB and Trip circuit supervision –Analog inputs supervision –Power Supply supervision–Communication channel
supervision–Relay availability / health
supervision
![Page 9: Scheduled Versus Event Driven Testing of Distribution Protection IEDs](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062521/568166b6550346895ddabea0/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Page: 9
Monitoring Functions of the IEDCT and VT Circuit Supervision• Logic for monitoring the individual phases to
determine the circuit integrity (CT Failure logic)• Operational conditions such as blown fuses
(LOP)• Analog Input supervision is also possible where
conditions such as, – abnormal phase imbalance (a ratio
error)– unexpected sequence components
appear (when 3-Ph balanced system conditions are expected)
– stub bus logic, or pole dead logic
![Page 10: Scheduled Versus Event Driven Testing of Distribution Protection IEDs](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062521/568166b6550346895ddabea0/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Page: 10
Monitoring Functions of the IEDCB and Trip Circuit Supervision • Traditional trip circuit supervision• Monitor the performance of the CB
for accumulated duty (total interrupted current kA)
• Slow Operation• Pole Disagreement• Flashover Logic• Breaker Failure (BF) Logic.
![Page 11: Scheduled Versus Event Driven Testing of Distribution Protection IEDs](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062521/568166b6550346895ddabea0/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Page: 11
Monitoring Functions of the IEDPower Supply Supervision • Station Battery Conditions such as:
– Loss of DC– Reduced Operating Voltage– Relay Power Supply Trouble / Failure– Redundant Supply Failover Scheme
Communication Channel Supervision– Monitoring by guard, check-back, or
watch dog– Failover to backup system or scheme
![Page 12: Scheduled Versus Event Driven Testing of Distribution Protection IEDs](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062521/568166b6550346895ddabea0/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Page: 12
Monitoring Functions of the IEDRelay Availability / Health
Supervision • Self Diagnostics as internal health
monitor(A/D, Main & Sub Processors, Memory, Operating System, Firmware, Output Controller, etc.)
• Fail Safe Alarm and remedial action taken
• Time stamped events log with error codes
![Page 13: Scheduled Versus Event Driven Testing of Distribution Protection IEDs](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062521/568166b6550346895ddabea0/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Page: 13
Once Commissioned, What’s Next?
• Define what a Scheduled Test consists of– If Settings or Firmware is changed – test with same test
plan used for commissioning (or subset)[No Ad Hoc testing, eliminate variables, H errors]
– Exercise relay output contacts, verify 52b operates– Visual inspection of wiring, insulation, terminals– Event file, Logs, Waveform Capture, Metering– File compare of IED to source settings file– Testing interval determined by Reliability Counsel, critical
asset, events • Under any circumstance, NEVER change a setting
to perform a Scheduled or Routine test – this violates the integrity of the commissioned IED and requires re-commissioning it.
![Page 14: Scheduled Versus Event Driven Testing of Distribution Protection IEDs](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062521/568166b6550346895ddabea0/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Page: 14
What Scheduled Tests Are Required?
• They differ by the type and vintage of Protection Relay, (its importance to the system, its economic impact if it fails) and what impact those tests have on the commissioned status of the relay.
• E/M relays should be tested according to Mfg recommendations and schedules
• E/M relays are affected by their environment. Oxidation, moisture, dust, insulation breakdown, mechanical wear, vibration, and tolerance adjustments require routine attention
• Any changes to E/M relays prompt re-commissioning
![Page 15: Scheduled Versus Event Driven Testing of Distribution Protection IEDs](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062521/568166b6550346895ddabea0/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Page: 15
What Scheduled Tests Are Required?
• Static relays which are not fully digital can have extended test intervals over E/M relays as the environmental and mechanical weaknesses are removed by design
• Due to switches, potentiometers, and variable resistors, they should be tested according to the Mfg requirements to maintain calibration
• Routine checks are needed to verify availability and health
• Any changes should be treated as re-commissioning
![Page 16: Scheduled Versus Event Driven Testing of Distribution Protection IEDs](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062521/568166b6550346895ddabea0/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Page: 16
IEC 61850 Based System
![Page 17: Scheduled Versus Event Driven Testing of Distribution Protection IEDs](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062521/568166b6550346895ddabea0/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
GOOSE
Page: 17
![Page 18: Scheduled Versus Event Driven Testing of Distribution Protection IEDs](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062521/568166b6550346895ddabea0/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Page: 18
Conclusions• Maintenance testing plays an
important role in the asset management of IEDs
• Proper use of all monitoring functions allows a significant reduction in the requirements for scheduled testing and covers not only the protection devices themselves, but also other components of the fault clearing system
• IEC 61850 plays an important role and allows reduction of the maintenance tests