Scheduled or on-demand feeding? Effects on children’s educational outcomes, psycho-social...
-
Upload
janel-robertson -
Category
Documents
-
view
220 -
download
0
Transcript of Scheduled or on-demand feeding? Effects on children’s educational outcomes, psycho-social...
Scheduled or on-demand feeding? Effects on children’s educational
outcomes, psycho-social development
and sleeping patternsMaria Iacovou
University of CambridgeUNICEF UK Baby Friendly Initiative Conference
Glasgow, 27th-28th November 2013
What we know already
what you feed a baby
when you feed a baby
What we know already
what you feed a baby
when you feed a baby
Questions
Do feeding schedules affect babies’ and children’s development?
Growth and health?Cognitive development?Psycho-social adjustment?Later sleeping patterns?And mothers’ wellbeing?
Data: ALSPAC
Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children
About 10,500 babies born in 1990 and 1991
Based in and around Bristol
Information from:Both parents, 3x during pregnancy Both parents, repeatedly over childhoodWeights, measures and various testsTeacher assessmentsData from national tests
Variable of interest: feeding schedules
Asked at 4 weeks:
“Is your baby fed (either by breast or bottle) on a regular schedule (e.g. every 4 hours)?”
“Yes, always” (7.2%)
“Try to” (23.4%)
“No, fed on demand” (69.4%).
1. Maternal wellbeing
“Getting enough sleep?”
“Feeling: weepy or tearful? irritable? exhausted?”
Maternal confidence and enjoyment scales
“Motherhood is something a woman learns naturally”
“...Pretty sure I’m doing the right thing for my child”.
Depression measures: Edinburgh & Crown-Crisp scales.
Continuous variables are standardised; discrete variables are collapsed into two categories.
2. Cognitive attainment
SATs scores in Reception class (age 5), KS1 (age 7), KS2 (age 11) and KS3 (age 14)
Ages 5 and 7: Reading, writing, maths
Ages 11 and 14: English, maths, science
Separate IQ test at age 8
All standardised (0,1)
Strengths & Difficulties questionnaire
Teacher assessments in Years 3 & 6 (ages 8 & 11)
Five domainsHyperactivityEmotional problemsPeer problemsConduct problemsProsocial score
Aggregate composed of the 4 “problem” scores
3. Psycho-social outcomes
6 months, 18 months, 9 years: does child sleep regularly?
9 years: Refusing to go to bed, difficulty falling asleep, night waking, early morning waking, nightmares.
9 and 11 years: sleep durations
4. Sleeping
Mothers and babies randomly assigned to scheduling or demand groups
Unfortunately, no such trial exists
Feeding mode is a choice mothers make, based on various factors....
... which may also affect their babies’ development
Use statistical techniques which account for this selection
The ideal: a randomised controlled trial
Who feeds to a schedule?
Demand-feeding mothers in the sample are from more socially privileged groups. For example:
6% of schedule-feeding mothers have a degree
8% of “tried a schedule” mothers
18% of demand-feeding mothers
“Tried-a-schedule” mothers are much more similar to schedule-feeding mothers than to demand-feeding mothers.
Analytical methods
Ordinary Least Squares and logistic regressionControl for factors including social class, education, marital situation, mother’s work, health behaviours, housing, breastfeeding, etc etc
Propensity Score MatchingCompare “like with like”Compare schedule-feeding mother-baby pairs with demand-feeding pairs who look just like them
Results: maternal wellbeing
On almost all measures, schedule-feeding mothers report significantly higher levels of wellbeing than demand-feeding mothers.
These differences persist for at least 3 years
However, on the formal measures of depression, there is NO difference between the two groups
Mothers who tried to schedule have the same outcomes as demand-feeding mothers.
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
Maternal confidence,
8m
Maternal confidence,
33m
Maternal enjoyment,
8m
Maternal enjoyment,
33m
Incr
ease
in m
ater
nal
confi
denc
e/en
joym
ent
Demand
Tried
Schedule
Results: cognitive development
After controlling for observable differences between the samples, demand-fed babies do significantly better than schedule-fed babies on all SATs tests and IQ tests.
The outcomes of “tried-a-schedule” babies are no different to those of demand-fed babiesIacovou, M. and Sevilla-Sanz, A (2013). "Infant feeding: the effects of scheduled vs. on-demand feeding on mothers' wellbeing and children's cognitive development" European Journal of Public Health (2013) 23(1) pp 13-19
Questions:
How big is the effect? About 17% of a standard deviationConservative estimate: about 3 “positions” in a class of 30 children
What might be the mechanisms? Discuss this later
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Mod
el B . .
Mod
el B . .
Mod
el B . .
Mod
el B . .
Age 5 SATs tests Age7 SATs tests Age 11 SATs tests Age14 SATs tests
Incr
ease
in sc
ores
ass
ocia
ted
wit
h de
man
d fe
edin
g Cognitive attainment
Full
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Mod
el B . .
Mod
el B . .
Mod
el B . .
Mod
el B . .
Age 5 SATs tests Age7 SATs tests Age 11 SATs tests Age14 SATs tests
Incr
ease
in sc
ores
ass
ocia
ted
wit
h de
man
d fe
edin
g
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
.
Mod
el C . .
Mod
el C . .
Mod
el C . .
Mod
el C .
Age 5 SATs tests Age7 SATs tests Age 11 SATs tests Age14 SATs tests
Incr
ease
in s
core
s as
soci
ated
wit
h de
man
d fe
edin
gCognitive attainment
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Mod
el B . .
Mod
el B . .
Mod
el B . .
Mod
el B . .
Age 5 SATs tests Age7 SATs tests Age 11 SATs tests Age14 SATs tests
Incr
ease
in sc
ores
ass
ocia
ted
wit
h de
man
d fe
edin
g
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
.
Mod
el C . .
Mod
el C . .
Mod
el C . .
Mod
el C .
Age 5 SATs tests Age7 SATs tests Age 11 SATs tests Age14 SATs tests
Incr
ease
in s
core
s as
soci
ated
wit
h de
man
d fe
edin
g
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
. .
PSM
. .
PSM
. .
PSM
. .
PSM
Age 5 SATs tests Age7 SATs tests Age 11 SATs tests Age14 SATs tests
Incr
ease
in s
core
s as
socia
ted
with
dem
and
feed
ing
Cognitive attainment
A question on breastfeeding
Could the relationship between demand feeding and better cognitive outcomes arise because of longer breastfeeding durations for demand-feeding mothers?
Answer: yes, but only partially
(about 2 points of the 17-point difference comes via breastfeeding durations)
Perhaps the most important question of all
We’ve controlled for observable differences between mothers. But what if unobservable differences are driving the relationship between feeding mode and children’s outcomes?
Two reasons why this probably isn’t a major issue.
First, the outcomes of “tried-to-schedule” babies.Second, look at this graph...
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
Test
scor
e re
lati
ve t
o de
man
d-fe
d ch
ild -
% o
f a s
tand
ard
devi
ation
Science, KS3
English, KS3
Maths, KS2
Is unobserved heterogeneity driving the effect?
Results: psycho-social adjustment
0
.05
.1
.15
.2
-5 0 5 10 15 sdqY6tot
kernel = epanechnikov, bandwidth = 1.2000
Kernel density estimate Year 6 SDQ scores,
by sex
0
.05
.1
.15
.2
-5 0 5 10 15 sdqY6tot
kernel = epanechnikov, bandwidth = 1.2000
Kernel density estimate Year 6 SDQ scores,
by sex
Results: psycho-social adjustment
Results differ by gender
For boys: no difference in outcomes between schedule- and demand-fed children.
For girls: significant differences in outcomes, with demand-fed babies having a lower incidence of later problems.
Effects are concentrated in the hyperactivity and emotional components of SDQ
Results: sleeping habits
Question: do schedule-fed babies have better/different sleep habits than demand-fed babies?Answer: not reallySchedule-fed babies are more likely to sleep regularly at 6 monthsBut not at older agesAt age 9, schedule-fed babies more likely to refuse to go to bed and to wake at nightBut differences are really very small
Results: sleep durations
9 years 11 years
Schedule 11.25 10.97
Tried 11.06 10.78
Demand 10.91 10.60
Schedule-fed babies: 20 mins longer sleep durations
Fairly large difference: 0.5 SD
0.1
.2.3
.4D
ensi
ty
6 8 10 12 14sleep9_SD
kernel = epanechnikov, bandwidth = 0.8000
Kernel density estimate
School-day sleep durations, age 9
by feeding mode
demand
schedule
Implications
Robust relationship
Possible issues with parental reporting
Next step: get hold of data on ALSPAC subsample who were “metered”
Assess whether 20 mins extra sleep is a good thing
What are the mechanisms?
Heterogeneity between mothers
Possible, but unlikely to be a major factor
Heterogeneity between babies
Possible: investigate with observational studies
Possible causal mechanisms
Breastfeeding durationBiological – frequency of feeding affecting concentration of lipids in milk? Demand-feeding encourages interactive “asking-and-getting”?Maternal responsiveness
Next steps
Collaborate with psychologists to measure effects of feeding mode on (eg) stress hormones Collect more detailed data on the nature of feeding schedules (and demand feeding)More work on sleep!