SCB_031953

64
U. S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE OFFICE OF BUSINESS ECONOMICS Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Transcript of SCB_031953

  • U. S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

    OFFICE OF BUSINESS ECONOMICS

    Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

  • SURVEY OF CUMBENT BUSINESS

    /$*~>rzs\/v^lfiuifx^X

    Vol. 33 M . 3g >& No. 31 ' I hrl 1 /$^& I IVt 1

    ' ,' M A R C H 1953^

  • MARCH 1953

    By the Office of Business Economics

    Metal Consuming IndustriesNew orders have been about equal to salesin recent months

    BILLIONS OF DOLLARS12

    NEW ORDERS

    +SALES

    I960 1951 1952 1953

    Ratio of unfilled orders to monthly sales stillfar above pre-Korean rate

    ELECTRICALMACHINERY ANDEQUIPMENT

    TRANSPORTATIONEQUIPMENT

    MACHINERY,EXCLUDINGELECTRICAL

    FABRICATED METALPRODUCTS

    NOTE: DATA ARE SEASONALLY ADJUSTED

    U. S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE. OFFICE OF BUSINESS ECONOMICS 53-34yr~r*T^F~7/I. H..VV V ' ^ - '

    H,LIGH level stability has characterized the nationaleconomy ^ during the opening quarter of the year. Thenational income and product have remained steady at ratessomewhat above the fourth quarter 1952 when much of theoutput lost during the steel shutdown was being made up.

    Personal consumption, fixed business investment andGovernment purchases of goods and services appear cur-rently to be absorbing a larger share of the national productwith the result that the flow of additional goods into inven-tory has been greatly reduced. The rebuilding of metalproducts stocks was a major influence in the inventoryincrease of late 1952.

    The progressive removal or relaxing of price and materialscontrols has been accompanied by few disturbances in com-modity markets. This signifies that there are not manyinstances where supplies are substantially below demand.The most pronounced price movements have occurred inmarkets for farm products where surpluses, partly seasonalin character, caused price weakness and required supportingmeasures by the Government.

    Material controls were relaxed in February when theNational Production Authority authorized producers ofcontrolled materials to accept "unrated" orders for any freecapacity they might have. The effects of this "open-ending" of CMP will depend upon the available productivecapacities relative to demand for the various types of steel,aluminum, copper, and brass products. In the months aheadthere should be additional quantities of these materials avail-able for distribution.

    Civilian materials controls to lapseThe Controlled Materials Plan is to remain in effect until

    June 30. At that time all materials controls over civilianproduction and construction will be terminated. At thesame time, CMP is scheduled to be replaced by a new systemof controls known as the Defense Materials System whoseregulations will assure producers allotments of materialsrequired for defense production and construction.

    Since the lifting of price controls on a broad assortment ofproducer and consumer goods, most market prices are nowfree. By mid-March only 5 percent, as measured by baseperiod market value, of the 2,000 or so commodities includedin the Bureau of Labor Statistics wholesale price index werestill under control by the Office of Price Stabilization. Steelmill products, machine tools and certain other fabricatedsteel products, sulfur and sulfur chemicals are the mostimportant of these. With regard to consumer goods, allprice controls have been removed.

    Prices of most commodities after being freed from controlhave shown little change up to mid-March. Some increased.Copper rose most as domestic quotations moved closer to

    Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

  • SURVEY OF CURRENT BUSINESS March

    the world price. Other prices, such as lead and zinc, de-clined as decontrol occurred at a time when supplies wereincreasing.

    Farm price adjustmentsPrices received by farmers continued to decline during

    January and early February and also dropped further belowparity, but firmed somewhat in late February and earlyMarch. As of mid-February, farm product prices were off9 percent from February 1952 and stood 6 percent belowparity. This price decline means lower raw materials costsfor processors of farm products, especially food, and cottontextiles. In some casesnotably meatslower consumerprices resulted. It can also mean, however, loss of incomefor farmers if the larger quantities marketed are more thanoffset by their lower prices and by relatively higher costs offarm production.

    Weakness of farm product prices in late 1952 and the earlyweeks of this year is chiefly ascribable to the larger quantitiesmarketed and in some cases also, to the shrinkage of foreigndemand. These price declines reflected the adjustment ofthe supplies resulting from the record-breaking large farmoutput of 1952 to current demands for farm materials.

    During the course of the farm price decline, many majorcommodities fell to (or slightly below) support prices andthis brought an increase in price support operations. Largequantities of basic commodities such as cotton, corn, andwheat have been placed under loan while others, such asbutter and cheese, have been purchased outright. As sup-port operations have continued and some easing has takenplace in the movement to market, farm product prices firmedappreciably between mid-February and early March.

    Personal income still risingThe flow of personal income in the first quarter is well

    above that of the fourth quarter of 1952. The January total,at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of $280.5 billion, wasonly fractionally above December but was up $3.5 billion orone percent from the fourth quarter average.

    Major factors underlying the continuation of the incomerise were moderately higher employment, on a seasonallyadjusted basis, and the further rise of average hourly earn-ings of employees. In addition there wrere small increases innonfarm proprietors' income, as well as in rents and intransfer payments.

    The increase in employment was particularly marked fromJanuary to February when a half million more persons wereengaged in nonagricultural pursuits. Total nonagriculturalemployment of 55.6 million exceeded February 1952 by 1.9million, while unemployment was 0.3 million lower.

    Retail distribution largeSales of retail stores, on a seasonally adjusted basis, have

    continued high in the early months of the year. AlthoughJanuary sales were one percent below the December high,they were above any other preceding month, and preliminarydata indicate the maintenance of the January sales rateduring February.

    A part of the sales dip from December to January was dueto lower prices, especially for food and apparel. Since salesin January 1953 were nearly 10 percent above those ofJanuary 1952 while retail prices averaged 1 percent lower,it is clear that retail distribution has commenced this year insubstantially heavier volume than a year ago.

    January sales of durable goods stores, seasonally adjust etwere 3 percent above December and the highest since ttadvance buying wave which culminated at the beginning c1951. All major groups participated and showed gains froiDecember; hardware stores, motor vehicle dealers, anhousehold appliances including radio stores registered the mosdecisive gains from the fourth quarter.

    and . ,Sains by major store groups are we!Sabove et year ago < with prices -generallysteady or lower , .

    INDEX, DEC, 1051^100140

    ALL RETAIL STORES

    ^PRICES

    I I I I I I I I ! I ! I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i

    120

    100

    80

    140

    120

    IOQ

    80 1 I I I... I... | | I. 1 I I l l | | I I I I I I | I I I I . 1 I | I

    DURABLE-GOODS STORES

    FOOD GROUP120

    100

    80 | 1 I ! I I I I | | II I I I t > I ' ' I I . . I . . I ' ' ' ' ' '120

    100

    APPAREL GROUP

    8 0 I I I I I I J I I I I I I t | I I i I t | I I I I \ \ I I Ii&&t 'io*io " ' ittd t^**?Qi i9%/4& - - ' iyt+f&

    U. $. &PAnTMt

  • March 1053 SURVEY OF CURRENT BUSINESS

    showing relative to December and general merchandisestores the poorest.

    Durables aided by creditSales of durables were aided in January by the continued

    expansion of instalment credit above the year-end total.This expansion, although small, was unusual and contra-seasonal. It was accounted for by a substantial rise ininstalment credit extended by automotive dealers and a risein cash instalment loans, chiefly by commercial banks. Re-tail purchasers have thus started the year by adding to theirstocks of durable goods but have incurred larger instalmentdebt in so doing.

    Production moves higherCommodity production in the first three months of this

    year is continuing moderately upward, paced by the steel,construction, and automobile industries. The activity ofthese three basic industries is suggestive of the high rate atwhich the Nation's business economy has worked in thisopening quarter of 1953. It is to be noted, however, that thenondurable goods industries have not thus far been so activeas those making durable goods.

    From the beginning of the year the steel industry hasoperated virtually at its January 1, 1953 capacity of 117.5million tons under the pressure of requirements for defense,for construction and producers7 durable equipment, and forconsumer durable goods. Since a further addition to capacityof about 5 million tons is programed during 1953, the industryappears capable of supplying a very large tonnage of steelfor civilian use after meeting in full all defense requirements.

    -Even without the expected 1953 addition to capacity, con-tinuation during the remainder of the year of the averageoperating rate that has prevailed from New Year's daythrough the second week of March would yield 116 milliontons or 19 million more than in 1950.

    The construction industry, a major consumer of steel, isalso commencing the year at a high rate. Expenditures fornew construction put in place during January and Februarytotaled $4.5 billion or 6 percent above the same 1952 period.The decline from last year's fourth quarter rate was consid-erably less than is usual for the winter season and indicatesthat the industry is getting an unusually good start to whatpromises to be a year of exceptional if not record-breakingachievement.

    Auto production highest in tivo yearsMotor vehicle production has moved with great irregular-

    ity since the invasion of South Korea. For the most partthe availability of steel has controlled production movementsin this period, although at its start production was greatlystimulated by the abnormal demand arising from buyerfear of future shortages.

    The expansion in motor vehicle production, which beganfollowing settlement of the work stoppage in the steel millslast summer has continued into the current quarter. Com-pletions had exceeded the prestrike rate as earl}7 as Septem-ber and in the fourth quarter hit close to 1.7 million carsand trucks (see chart).

    On the basis of production for January and February andprojected schedules for March the industry in the currentquarter is expected to turn out 1.5 million passenger carsand 350,000 trucks for a total of 1,850,000 units, up nearly200,000 from the fourth quarter of 1952 and 560 thousandabove the year-ago volume. This production performancewould represent the best quarter since the April-June 1951

    period. It would virtually equal the quarterly average rateof the first half of 1950, "but still less than the peak ratereached in the third quarter of 1950.

    All of the increase in production in the current quarter ascompared with the October-December 1952 period will bein passenger cars as assemblies of trucks are expected toshow a small decline. Truck production has been gener-ally more stable throughout most of the postwar periodthan was the case for passenger cars.

    To achieve the high volume indicated for the January-March period, the industry supplemented its allotments ofsteel by the continued use of conversion and foreign steeland by borrowing on the second quarter's allotment.

    In addition to the continued strong domestic demand formotor vehicles and parts, foreign demand for these productshave accounted for a significant proportion of the total sales.About 7 percent of the total value of United States exports

    Motor VehicleMILLIONS OF UM1TSi 0

    TOTAL MOTOR VEHICLES

    \

    TRUCKS AND BUSSES

    I I I I I I I I I1929 3! 33 35 37 39 41

    ANNUAL TOTALS

    47 49 I960 I 1951 I 1952 1953QUARTERLY TOTALS,

    AT ANNUAL RATES

    U. S. DEPARTMENT OP COMMERCE. OFFICE OF BUSINESS ECONOMICS

    consists of motor vehicles and related products. Factorysales of motor vehicles to foreign markets in the past twoyears averaged close to 7 percent of total production, withexports accounting for 4 percent of passenger cars and 14percent of trucks and busses.

    The pickup in production in the most recent months hasbeen accompanied by a considerable increase in the numberof new cars in the hands of retail dealers. However, someaccumulation usually occurs in the early months of theyear, in anticipation of the normally high spring sellingseason, and the current buildup is from an exceptionallylow level last summer. In February of this year stocks,while up substantially from the low^ point of midsummer of1952 and moderately higher than year-ago levels, were stilllow relative to sales on the basis of prewar standards.

    On February 1 dealers stocks of passenger cars and truckswere each considerably less than one month's production.The number of passenger cars held by dealers and in transitaveraged a little more than 8 cars per dealer. This compareswith an average of nearly 10 cars in May 1951, the high forthat year, and around 11 in June 1950. Thus, it appears

    Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

  • SURVEY OF CURRENT BUSINESS Mnrcli

    that dealers are in a position to add to existing stocks so asto offer car buyers a wider selection of models and colorsduring the current selling season. The recent increases innew car sales have also been accompanied by higher dealerinventories of used cars.

    Large producer of nonautomotive linesBesides producing motor vehicles and related products,

    the automobile industry is also engaged in the production ofsuch nonautomotive lines as refrigerators, freezers, washingmachines, diesel-electric locomotives, and other products. Inaddition, since the outbreak of hostilities in Korea in June1950 the industry has been producing for defense economy.

    Hence, total production and emplo3Tinent in the industryhave been less closely tied to motor vehicle production thanis normally the case.

    On the basis of shipments data submitted to NationalProduction Authority by the metal fabricating industriesit is estimated that shipments against military and otherrelated orders in 1952 accounted for approximately one-fifthof total shipments of the automobile industry. In a recentlabor market study by the Bureau of Labor Statistics it wasestimated that roughly 22 percent of employees in theautomobile industry in November of 1952 were engaged in theproduction of defense and related lines. Despite the rise ofdefense production, sales to the civilian market still constituteby far the greater proportion of the total.

    Recent Trends in Manufacturers' OrdersT,HE high rate of manufacturing output in recent months

    has generally been matched by the rate of incoming orders.Backlogs, as a consequence, have held at about $73 billionsince last Novemberas compared to an average of $75billion in the third quarter of 1952. The volume of ordersto be filled is now three times as large as in the early part of1950.

    The moderate decline in unfilled orders from last Septem-ber was in part due to seasonal influences and to cancellationsof some orders as a result of rescheduling of several armamentprograms. Movements in recent months, however, pointto a flattening out in the trend of manufacturers' backlogs,after an almost uninterrupted expansion in the 27 monthsfollowing the Korean outbreak.

    Defense and civilian backlogs about equalThe shift from continuous growth of unfilled orders to

    relative balance between now orders and deliveries is pri-marily an indicator of the progress of the defense mobilizationprogram.

    Although it is difficult to ascertain how much of thecurrent backlogs on books of manufacturers representeddefense contracts, available information indicates that thelatter accounted for roughly half the total. Defense con-tracts outstanding have been on a plateau in recent monthsas have total unfilled orders.

    Unfilled orders steadyThe recent cessation of advances in unfilled orders has not

    resulted from any shrinkage in new orders for producers ofeither durables or iiondurables. New business expanded inearly fall and has since held relatively firm.

    Total outstanding commitments for durable goods inJanuary were $7.5 billion more than in the correspondingmonth a year ago. Transportation equipment and electricalmachinery producers accounted for all of this rise in backlogs.Relative to sales in the respective periods, however, backlogsare now equivalent to 6 months of shipments, or just underthe vear-ago rates. The backlog-sales ratio for the electrical

    machinery industry is currently higher than a year agowhile for other major durable-goods industries it was slightlybelow January 1952 rates.

    Variations in backlogsAs rioted earlier, the rise in shipments over the past year

    has tended to lower slightly the average number of monthsof sales represented by the volume of unfilled orders on hand.In order to derive some insight into the varying experiencewithin this average, a special tabulation was made coveringthe transportation equipment, electrical machinery, andnonelectrical machinery fields. These industry groups heldmore than two-thirds of all manufacturers' unfilled ordersat the beginning of 1953.

    Table 1.Manufacturers' Unfilled Orders and Unfilled Order-SalesRatios, by Major Durable-Goods Industries

    Industry

    All durable goods _Primary metalsFabricated metalsElectrical machinery-Other machineryTransportation equipinen tOther durable goods

    Unfilled orders (billions ofdollars)

    Jan. 1950

    19.23.82.52.83. 14. 12.8

    Jan. 1952

    63.58.15.99.0

    12.222.20.0

    Jan. 1953

    70.08.05.8

    11.510.128.56.1

    Ratio of unfilled orders toseasonally adjusted sales(number of months)

    Jan. 1950

    2.72.93. 34.12.82.61. 7

    Jan. 1952

    5.84.14.88.55. 99. 7

    Jan. 1953

    5.73.84.19.64.89.42.4

    Source: U. S. Department of Commerce, Office of Business Economics.

    At the start of this year unfilled orders held by almostone-half of these companies were about the same or higherthan a year earlier. Sales of most concerns, however, roseduring 1952 and as a result backlog-sales ratios for themajority were lowered. As can be seen in table 2, theratios of 65 percent of the companies were reduced by morethan 10 percent during 1952, while only slightly more thanone-fifth of the firms reported increases of over 10 percent.It may be noted however, that current backlog-sales ratios

    Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

  • March 1953 SURVEY OF CURRENT BUSINESS

    for the bulk of these companies are far in excess of theirearly 1950 rates.

    There were divergent industry trends within the group of^machinery and transportation equipment companies. Therelative dispersion of companies according to changes intheir backlog-sales ratio between the beginning and endof 1952 was more favorable for electrical machinery producersthan for nonelectrical machinery and transportation equip-ment companies.

    Transportation equipment new orders risingAt the end of January, backlogs of the transportation

    equipment group aggregated $27 billionalmost entirelydefense contracts. The January total was $1.5 billionbelow last September, but some $5 billion above January1952.

    The ratio of unfilled contracts on hand to sales in thetransportation equipment industry at the end of Januarywas 10 months, or about the same as last January. Sincemany of the contracts placed with this industry involvedlong blueprint, tooling-up and production periods, it wasnot until September 1952 that deliveries were made inquantities even approaching the volume of new orders.During the fall the expansion in shipments was a littlelarger than the rise in new orders, but by late winter thetwo were in balance.

    The aircraft sector shows the highest average ratio ofunfilled orders to salesabout 30 months. However, thisindustry has begun to cut into its high backlog. For morethan one-half of the reporting firms, the volume of businesson hand was lower relative to sales at the end of 1952 than

    ~i year earlier, while only a fourth had increases of morethan 10 percent in unfilled orders-sales ratios.

    For other transportation equipment producers exceptmotor vehicles current backlogs equal 8 months of salesadecline of 4 months from early 1952. Few companies haveincreased their ratios of backlogs to sales over the past year.

    Machinery backlogs still highUnfilled orders of machinery producers aggregated more

    than $21 billion at the end of January, about the same as inJanuary 1952, and $15 billion higher than in the immediatepre-Korean period. A large portion of this total is currentlyin defense contracts, but civilian goodsboth producers'and consumers'constitute an important part of the businessin this area. Since the production periods for these com-panies are generally shorter than those in the transportationequipment group, machinery deliveries began to match theinflow of new orders early last spring.

    N ew orders for machinery have shown considerablestrengthening in the late fall and winter. The firmnessstemmed primarily from the electrical machinery sectorwhere new orders have moved up relatively more in recentmonths than any other major industry. Late winter back-logs of outstanding contracts held by electrical machineryproducers are now back to the October high of $11.5 billion.This total represented nearly 10 months of sales at currentrates, as compared with 8.5 months a year ago.

    In addition to sizable defense business, orders of electricalequipment producers have benefited from the rapidly ex-panding electronics field, the opening of new television sta-tions, as well as from the autumn upturn in consumer de-mand for television receivers and electrical appliances.Producers in the radio, radar, television, and other communi-cations equipment group received new orders totaling about4 percent more in 1952 than a year earlier. In spite of in-

    creasing deliveries, backlogs rose by a third from the begin-ning of 1952 to early this year. The rise brought theJanuary ratio of backlogs to sales to 13 months.

    Manufacturers of electrical generating and transmissionequipment have shown about the same orders and sales pat-tern as the commimicatioiis group. The January averagebacklog ratio was nearly 12 months as compared with a littleless than 8 months a year ago.

    For other electrical machinery producers, orders on handrepresented about 6 months of sales. About a third of thereporting companies improved their order-sales position atthe beginning of 1953 over early 1952, while about halfshowed some deterioration in this ratio.

    Industrial machinery backlogs reducedA somewhat different pattern of orders trends is found

    among manufacturers of metalworking, special, and generalindustrial machinery. New orders in this industry reacheda high in late 1951. Since then, the value of new businessreceived has moved* down moderately, while deliveries havebeen sharply expanded.

    As a result, industrial machinery backlogs which reacheda peak of 9 months of sales in February of last year now rep-

    Table 2.Unfilled Orders Position of Machinery and Transporta-tion Equipment Companies

    [Percentage of companies]

    Changes in unfilled orders Jan. 1, 1952, to Jan.1, 1953:

    Increases of more than 10 percent.. ..(+) 10 percent to ( ) 10 percent

    Decreases of more than 10 percent. . ...Changes in ratios of unfilled orders to sales, Jan.

    1, 1952, to January 1, 1953:Increases of more than 10 percent(+) 10 percent to ( ) 10 percent _ ._ -Decreases of more than 10 percent _ _ _ _

    All com-panies

    29.717.153.2

    20. 514.465. 1

    Electricalmachin-

    45.811.942.4

    26.326.347.4

    Othermacbin-

    17.810.462.8

    17.811.570.7

    Trans-portationequip-ment

    50.714.934.4

    19.89 .X

    70.4

    Source: U. S. Department of Commerce, Office of Business Economics.

    resent 7 months of current sales. The pre-Korean ratio ofunfilled orders to sales, it may be noted, was only 3 months.Only one-sixth of the companies have maintained or in-creased their unfilled orders-sales position. These firms weremore usually manufacturers of special industry machinery.

    While declining backlog ratios were characteristic of allsegments of the industrial machinery industry, machine-toolsproducers reported the largest decreases. Unfilled-orderratios of machine-tool companies have been about halvedfrom the beginning of 1952, although they are still close to 10months of shipments. Deliveries, it may be noted, are nowdouble their year-ago rates,

    Commercial machinery orders risingIn the nonindustrial machinery fieldequipment and ap-

    pliances for agriculture, construction, offices, stores, services,and homesoverall orders trends have been similar to thosein industrial machinery. Exceptions are office and storemachinery and household and service equipment where thegrowing availability of all types of metals for civilian use andthe lifting of commercial construction controls have resultedin recent expansion of both orders and deliveries in thesefields. Unfilled orders for household and service machineryhave reached new hidis.

    Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

  • 6 SUEVEY OF CURRENT BUSINESS March 3955

    1953 Investment Programs IncreasedB,BUSINESS has scheduled expenditures for new plant

    and equipment during 1953 at a continued high rate, accord-ing to reports submitted between mid-February and mid-March to the Office of Business Economics and the Securitiesand Exchange Commission.1 Nonfarm producers haveprogramed capital spending this year at $27.0 billion, ascompared to $26.5 billion last year, and $25.6 billion in 1951.

    Capital goods prices are currently only slightly above theiraverage for the full year 1952 and have shown little changein recent quarters. It thus appears that the 1953 programsnow contemplated represent a high year not only in dollarterms but also in physical volume of additions to productivefacilities.

    Public utilities have scheduled 1953 expenditures at $4.4billion, or 14 percent higher than in 1952. Mining companiesand nonrail transport companies expect more moderate in-creases. Manufacturing companies are planning 1953 out-lays of $12 billion, about equal to expenditures made lastyear. Anticipated additions of $1.3 billion by the railroads,on the other hand, are down 7 percent from last year.

    Investment programs now higherPrograms reported for 1953 in the current survey corrob-

    orate and reinforce the finding in a similar survey con-

    ducted last October that business was planning another highyear of new plant and equipment expenditures. Presentprograms are 5 percent higher than those reported earlierwith almost every major industry contributing to theincrease.

    While it is not possible to determine precisely the factorswhich raised the 1953 expenditure projections between thetwo survey periods, the higher current programs may reflectthe sizable expansion in business activity in the interimperiod and the greater completeness of 1953 programs nowas compared to those available last October.

    Investment during 1953The quarterly survey indicates that new plant and equip-

    ment expenditures are scheduled at seasonally adjustedannual rates of $27.5 billion and $28.1 billion, respectively, inthe first two quarters of this year. Additions to productivefacilities in this period, if realized, would be 4 percent higherthan the rate in the first half of 1952, and 6 percent higherthan in the strike-affected second half of last year.

    The scheduled capital spending of $27.8 billion (at season-ally adjusted annual rates) in the first half of this yearimplies an annual rate of fixed investment of some $26.2 bil-lion in the last half of 1953. However, past experience with

    Table 3.Expenditures for New Plant and Equipment by United States Business, 1951-53 1

    [Millions of dollars]

    All industries

    ManufacturingMining. .. - _Railroads

    Transportation, other than railPublic utilitiesCommercial and other 3

    AH industries

    1951

    25, 644

    10, 852929

    1,474

    1,4903, 6647,235

    1952

    26, 455

    11, 994880

    1,391

    1,3633,8386,989

    1953 2

    26,991

    12, 039910

    1,294

    1,3804, 3387,000

    1951

    I

    5,465

    2,157194294

    354729

    1,737

    II

    6,502

    2,743242394

    415897

    1,811

    III

    6,505

    2,738241354

    375983

    1,814

    1952

    IV

    7,173

    3,214252432

    3461, 0551,874

    I

    6,141

    2,650217360

    356821

    1,737

    II

    6,808

    3,156228386

    372928

    1,738

    III

    6,244

    2,820206289

    302947

    1,680

    IV

    7,265

    3,367229357

    3351, 1421,835

    1953

    12

    6,541

    3,028208335

    3041,0301,636

    112

    6,968

    3,163213396

    3151,1991,682

    Seasonally adjusted at annual rates[Billions of dollars]

    Manufacturing iMining 'Railroads . _ _ i

    Transportation, other than railPublic utilitiesCommercial and other 3

    23.74

    9.59.82

    1.28

    1.433.397 23

    25.47

    10.63.96

    1.47

    1.523.627.27

    26.49

    11.30.96

    1.52

    1.583.857.28

    26.56

    11.69.96

    1.60

    1.433.737.15

    26.72

    11.78.93

    1.56

    1.443.827.19

    26.58

    12.24.90

    1.44

    1.363.756.89

    25. 49

    11. 64.83

    1.24

    1.273.716.80

    26.96

    12.23.87

    1.32

    1.384.047.12

    1 27. 54

    12.78.84

    1.31

    1. 234.556.83

    28.07

    12.99.84

    1.48

    1.164.846.76

    1. Data exclude expenditures of agricultural business and outlays charged to current account..>,! _,* ~.,_4._~ ~t -, n ro ,1 ,_ __ nro _ _ i)asc(i on anticipated expenditures reported by business between mid-February and mid-March. In addition to seasonal2. Data for the first and second quarters of 1953 and for year 1953 are based on anticipated expenditures

    adjustment, the quarterly data are adjusted when necessary for systematic tendencies in anticipatory data.3. Data include trade, service, finance, communication and construction.Sources: U. S. Department of Commerce, Office of Business Economics, and Securities and Exchange Commission.

    these anticipatory surveys have indicated a tendency for thelatter part of the year (as well as the year as a whole) tobe understated relative to the earlier months of the year dueto the lesser completeness of future plans as compared tonear-term programs.

    1. In order to provide SURVEY readers with new information as quickly as it becomesavailable, this analysis presents only the highlights of the current survey of business capitalbudgets. A more detailed analysis of 1953 investment programs, as well as the results of theassociated survey of businessmen's 1953 sales expectations, will be presented in the AprilSUEVEY. It may be noted that the estimates presented here are based on more completedata for 1951. Earlier estimates are not affected by this revision.

    Considering for this factor, it would appear that the antici-pated rates of fixed investment in the halves of 1953 are notsignificantly different.

    Manufacturers' 1953 programsThe maintenance of 1952 rates of fixed investment expected

    by manufacturers in 1953 reflects the offsetting effects of(Continued on page 19)

    Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

  • by Walther Lederer

    The Balance of Payments in 1952JL HE improvement in the financial position of foreign

    countries, which was indicated by the international transac-tions of the United States during the second and third quar-ters of 1952, continued in the last quarter of the year. Dur-ing these nine months foreign countries were able, throughtheir transactions with the United States, to raise their hold-ings of gold and dollar assets by nearly $1.6 billion. Thesegains helped to bring total foreign gold and liquid dollarresources (excluding those of the International Bank and theInternational Monetary Fund) to over $20 billion by the endof 1952, almost the same amount as at the end of 1945, theprevious peak.

    Foreign reserves continue to increaseAlthough foreign countries continued to add to their gold

    and dollar holdings in the fourth quarter, a rise in the UnitedStates export balance on goods and services from the third tothe fourth quarter was largely responsible for a decline in

    f )ld and dollar transfers from $765 million to $395 million,he export rise must be attributed, however, mainly toseasonal and temporary factors, such as the upswing in

    ^agricultural exports and, to a lesser extent, the rise in ship-^Aients of steel and steel productsthe latter having beencurtailed during the previous quarter because of the steelstrike. In addition, income on investments advanced to theusual seasonal peak in the last quarter of the year.

    Table 1 indicates in simplified form the basic features andtrends of the balance of payments since the middle of 1950.

    Although substantial progress toward a better balancein international transactions has been achieved since thefirst quarter of 1952, net foreign purchases of goods andservices here in the fourth quarter of 1952 were still largerby an annual rate of $500 millionthan the amount of fundscurrently earned by foreign countries from United Statesimports or supplied by private United States investments andremittances.

    United States exports declineSeveral factors contributed to a decline in United States

    exports, which was the major reason that foreign countrieswere able to reduce the imbalance in their transactions withthe United States during 1952.

    First, business activity in the United States expandedfaster than in Western Europe in contrast to all other postwaryears, when the rise from each year to the next was greaterabroad than in the United States. Europe's faster advancesin the earlier years represented, of course, recovery from theunduly low levels of production which prevailed immediatelyafter the war.

    The index of industrial production in the United States^during the last quarter of the year averaged about 5 percent*higher than during the first quarter. The rise in industrialproduction in Western Europe was only approximately halfas much. This relative difference in expansion of industrial

    activity between this country and Western Europe couldordinarily be expected to raise the demand for imports hereand at the same time increase European incentives to exportto this country. Several factors, however, accentuated thenormally to be expected effects on international transactionsof these differences in the movement of production.

    Table 1.Summary of the United States Balance of Payments,July 1950-December 1952

    [Millions of dollars, quarterly totals or rates]

    Foreign countries earned from thesale of goods and services to theUnited States

    Foreign countries obtained totalgoods and services from theUnited States valued at

    Less those furnished undermilitary aid

    Other goods and services pur-chased in the United States

    Thus, foreign net expenditures ongoods and services (excludingthose furnished under militaryaid) were

    To finance these net purchases,foreign countries had at theirdisposal the following amountsof dollars received from UnitedStates sources:

    Investments in United Statescontrolled enterprises abroad.

    Other private loans and remit-tances

    Government economic grants,other transfers, and loans(net)

    Total foreign dollar receiptsfrom investments, gifts, andloans

    Thus, known foreign dollar re-ceipts exceeded (+) or fell short( ) of known foreign dollarexpenditures by

    However, unaccounted-for trans-actions required ( ) or supplied(+) additional dollar exchange of-

    So that foreign gold and dollarassets increased (+) or declined( ) by these amounts

    Line intable 2

    16

    g

    20

    24

    \ 18, 25,J 26

    1 19, 21,f 97 901 it, ZO

    35

    34

    July1950-June1951

    3,685

    4,324

    294

    4,030

    345

    173

    } 348

    i 816J

    1,337

    +992

    105

    +887

    July-De-

    cember1951

    3,603

    5,284

    374

    4,910

    1,307

    134

    227

    746

    1,107

    -200

    100

    -300

    I

    3,867

    5,347

    440

    4,907

    1,040

    180

    151

    557

    888

    -152

    -230

    -382

    19

    II

    3,867

    5,322

    589

    4,733

    866

    372

    241

    860

    1,473

    +607

    -203

    +404

    52

    III

    3,911

    4,604

    616

    3,988

    77

    75

    21

    768

    864

    +787

    -22

    +765

    IV

    4,083

    5,428

    949

    4,479

    396

    84

    187

    303

    574

    +178

    +217

    +395

    NOTEMR. LEDERER IS A MEMBER OF THE BALANCE OF PAY-MENTS DIVISION, OFFICE OF BUSINESS ECONOMICS.

    The textile industry, which underwent the relativelygreatest decline in output abroad, depends to a large extentupon raw materials from the United States, so that theimpact from the change in its activity was directly trans-ferred to United States exports.

    Also, the decline in demand for coal from the UnitedStates may in part be ascribed to the failure of industrialproduction in Western Europe to maintain the previousrate of expansion while coal production there continued to

    7

    Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

  • 8 SURVEY OF CURRENT BUSINESS March 1953

    [Millions of dollars]Table 2.Balance of Payments of the United

    LineNo.

    12346

    67

    8

    91011

    121314151617

    18192021

    22

    23

    242526272829

    30

    31323334

    35

    Item

    Exports of goods and services:Merchandise, adjustedTransportationTravelMiscellaneous services:

    PrivateGovernment - -

    Income on investments:PrivateGovernment

    TotalImports of goods and services:

    Merchandise, adjustedTransportation _TravelMiscellaneous services:

    PrivateGovernment

    Income on investments:PrivateGovernment

    TotalBalance on goods and servicesUnilateral transfers (net, to for-

    eign countries ( )):Private --Government:

    Economic aidMilitary aidOther

    TotalBalance on goods and services

    and unilateral transfers (bal-ance for "all areas" equals netforeign investment) .

    United States capital (net, out-flow (-)V.

    Private:Direct investmentsOther long-termShort-term

    Government:Long-term -Short-term __ _

    TotalForeign capital (net, outflow

    (-)):Long-term:

    Transactions in UnitedStates Governmentbonds.

    Other investmentsShort-term

    Gold sales (purchases ( ))Balance on foreign capital and

    gold.Transfers of funds between for-

    eign areas (receipts from otherareas ( )) and errors andomissions.

    All areas

    1951

    15, 4851,487

    420

    623211

    1,800192

    20,218

    11,668933722

    2491,084

    35147

    15, 0545,164

    -412

    -2, 969-1,402

    -70-4,913

    251

    -604-359-103-140-23

    -1,229

    -688

    1451,038-53442

    536

    1952

    I"

    4,177392102

    16094

    39329

    5,347

    2,962245132

    62377

    7712

    3,8671,480

    -387-440-30

    -953527

    -180-59

    4

    -1411

    -375

    8

    172

    -555-382

    230

    II

    4,088375141

    155109440

    14

    5,322

    2,844276203

    623739712

    3,8671,455

    -94

    -615-589-35

    -1,333122

    -372-88-59

    -187-23

    -729

    14

    4498

    -104404

    203

    III'

    3,436289160154104

    42041

    4,604

    2,689276343

    65439

    7920

    3,911693

    -103

    -538-616-31

    -1,288-595

    -755032

    -187-12

    -192

    54

    35669

    7

    765

    22

    IVi>

    4,158317109154116458116

    5,428

    3,024254145

    64472

    10420

    4,083

    1,345

    -122

    -364-949-34

    -1,469-124

    -84-23-42

    106-11

    -54

    228

    91-198

    274

    395

    -217

    Year

    15, 8591,373

    512

    623423

    1,711200

    20,701

    11, 5191,051

    823

    2531,661

    35764

    15, 7284,973

    -415-1,904

    2 594-130

    -5,043-70

    -711-120-65

    -409-45

    -1,350

    304

    1151,141

    -3781,182

    238

    Western Europe *

    1951

    6,32775637

    273133150163

    6,839

    2,175463188

    20636226314

    3,6713,168

    -192

    -2, 192-1,111

    11

    -3,484-316

    -783144

    117

    107

    -109

    127178

    -295-99

    308

    1952

    I'

    1, 439204

    86972

    3623

    1,851

    55212022

    50137594

    944907

    -44

    -286-358

    7

    -695212

    122

    23-64-3

    -30

    10

    058

    -549-481

    299

    II

    1,383172136846385

    1,725

    5461577551

    135604

    1,028697

    40

    461-498

    -1,009-312

    -18-39

    12

    -10015

    -130

    7

    -30220

    199

    243

    IIP

    1,08313113

    66353929

    1,396

    52215010354

    157588

    1,052344

    -47

    -422-475

    -5-949-605

    16K

    -21

    -8112

    -79

    34

    31453

    1519

    165

    IV*

    1,669142

    9665336

    1062,081

    64112642

    53171

    698

    1,110971

    -62

    -272-815

    -6-1,155

    -184

    520

    -32132-4

    121

    39

    56-92225228

    -165

    Year

    5,57464943

    269206149163

    7,053

    2,261553242

    208600

    24624

    4,1342,919

    -196-1,441-2, 146

    -25-3,808

    -889

    15-22-18

    -11320

    -118

    90

    57639

    -321465

    542

    Dependencies 2 JM

    1C51

    504617

    8(*)

    102()

    682

    1,0561945

    () 352

    (*)1,157-475

    -15

    ()-1

    -16-491

    -59

    -4

    -18-2

    -20

    9-51216

    495

    -^

    1952

    I

    150142

    2()

    23

    191

    3036

    16

    (*)2911

    356-165

    (")-3

    -168

    71

    -1

    -3()

    4

    11

    22

    162

    II

    1491332

    ()30

    197

    2937

    12

    (-)20

    1()

    333-136

    4

    ()-4

    -140

    121

    -1

    -2()

    10

    1151

    17

    113

    III-

    119113

    3C)

    22

    158

    1927

    13

    ()18

    11

    232-74

    -4

    ()-4

    -78

    134

    -24()

    -7

    1281

    30

    55

    IV P

    131122

    3(*)

    28

    176

    2547

    10

    W171

    1

    290-114

    -4

    ()-4

    -118

    (-)

    1

    7

    134

    2

    38

    73

    Year

    5495010

    10()

    103

    722

    1,0422751

    (-) 8443

    1,211

    -489

    -15

    ()-15

    -504

    }

    3923,

    I-30!

    ()14

    2787

    87

    403

    ' Less than $500,000. r Revised. Preliminary. 1. Western Europe includes the OEEC countries, Finland, Spain, and Yugoslavia.

    increase. Favorable weather conditions and the increasinguse of other sources of energy were additional factors re-ducing the consumption of coal. The decline in coal exportsto Western Europe from 3 million tons per month duringthe last half of 1951, to a 1-million ton rate during the last6 months of 1952 cannot be solely ascribed, therefore, tohigher coal production abroad, which accounted for only 1million tons of the difference. Reduced coal shipments fromthe United States over that period resulted in a decline inforeign dollar expenditures, including those for shipping, byabout $200 million. This was approximately 15 percentof the decline in the export surplus on goods and serviceswith Western Europe exclusive of exports under the mili-tary aid program.

    In contrast to the reduced rate of expansion in industrialproduction abroad, the accelerated rise in production and

    incomes here had stimulated imports by the end of 1952 tothe highest volume since the previous postwar peak fol-lowing the invasion of South Korea. The limited demandfrom other countries not only facilitated a rise in importsfrom Europe by 20 percent from the last quarter of 1951 tothe same period of 1952, but also permitted increased pur-chases of raw materials without price rises. The stabilityof prices in the face of rising demands by the United Stateswas in sharp contrast to the period immediately after tbinvasion of South Korea.

    Second, production of wheat in Canada and WesternEurope during the summer months was about 7.4 milliontons higher than during the previous season, and the graincrops in the southern hemisphere and in East Asia werealso substantially improved. Foreign purchases of Americanwheat during the second half of the calendar year in terms

    Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

  • larch 1953 SURVEY OF CURRENT BUSINESS 9tates by Areas, 1951, and 1952 by Quarters

    [Millions of dollars]

    Eastern Europe

    1951

    8

    4

    15

    18

    76

    6

    82

    -64

    -18

    13(*)

    R

    -69

    j 1; 16

    1

    17

    , -1i -11

    -12

    1

    1952

    I

    1

    (i)

    1(*)

    1

    3

    10

    (*)

    10

    -7

    -4

    -4

    -11

    (*)

    1-1

    0

    2-1

    -4

    15

    II

    1

    1

    1

    3

    9

    2

    11

    -8

    _4

    (*)

    -4

    -12

    (*)0

    (*)

    -1-1

    -2

    14

    III'

    1

    1

    57

    11

    1

    12-5

    0

    -3

    -8

    -1

    2-1

    0

    13

    4

    4

    IV*

    2

    1(*)

    (*)3

    9

    1

    107

    -4

    -4

    -11

    (*)1

    1

    -2

    -2

    12

    Year

    5(*)

    4(*)

    7

    16

    39

    4

    43

    -27

    -15

    (*)

    (*)-15

    -42

    -1(*)

    4-2

    1

    -3

    -4

    45

    Canada

    1951

    2,68271

    236

    824

    401

    3,476

    2, 296107255

    1824

    6315

    2,778

    698

    -10

    6

    -16

    682

    -271220

    53

    -5

    -444

    -554

    -8535

    2

    -25

    -213

    1952

    I

    6702057

    20

    71

    838

    5692424

    510

    123

    647

    191

    1

    -2

    -3

    188

    -43-48

    25

    (*)(*)-66

    6

    -815

    -3

    10

    -132

    11

    8193085

    236

    96(*)

    1,059

    6022156

    510

    313

    728

    331

    3

    328

    -203-6

    6

    -3

    -206

    11

    19159

    7

    182

    -304

    III'

    72525

    101

    252

    84

    962

    58622

    155

    517

    155

    805

    157

    -3

    -2

    -5

    152

    -6837-6

    -2(*)-39

    20

    -144

    68

    -181

    IV*

    7862561

    241

    121(*)

    1,018

    6832140

    540

    285

    822

    196

    i

    C)

    -3

    193

    -639

    i

    -60

    176

    28-135

    2

    71

    -204

    Year

    3,000100304

    929

    372(*)

    3,877

    2,44088

    275

    2077

    8616

    3,002

    875

    -6

    -8

    -14

    861

    -377820

    -6(*)

    -371

    219

    3883

    -9

    331

    -821

    Latin American Republics

    1951

    3,802328113

    12421

    74816

    5,152

    3, 533269216

    1965

    134

    4,119

    1,033

    -41

    -17-63

    -126

    907

    -18729

    -139

    -85 1

    -383

    11-99

    124

    34

    1952

    I

    1,0168130

    348

    1623

    1,334

    9087665

    521

    31

    1,079

    255

    -9

    -7-32-2

    -50

    205

    -6611

    -80

    -10

    -146

    -1

    212

    -5

    8

    -67

    II

    931

    II1

    1576

    1,258

    8596654

    522

    31

    1,010

    248

    -9

    -18i

    -35

    213

    -112

    -115

    1-224

    -3

    547

    -95

    -46

    57

    III'

    7727836

    30

    164

    1, 090

    66

    519

    31

    1,051

    39

    -14

    5

    -\-21

    18

    -129

    29

    -39(*)-13

    1

    086

    SS

    -93

    IV *

    8008531

    308

    170

    1,131

    9357348

    521

    31

    1,086

    45

    -13

    6-2

    -22

    23

    -59

    -5

    -2

    -1

    36

    65

    -86

    Year

    3, 519339128

    12332

    65319

    4,813

    3, 589285233

    2083

    124

    4,226

    587

    -45

    -25-53

    a

    -128

    459

    -19535

    -167

    -591

    -385

    -4

    12170

    -63

    115

    -189

    All other countries

    1951

    3,16127027

    7753

    3928

    3,988

    2, 5157518

    6560

    106

    3,190

    798

    135

    -520-301-69

    -1,025

    -227

    -63-56-73

    -142

    -341

    A

    ,

    454

    80

    534

    34

    1952

    I

    90170

    5

    2214

    962

    1, 110

    618195

    2178

    21

    825

    285

    -35

    -73-50-19

    -177

    108

    -90

    37

    -636

    -129

    -2

    0119

    0

    117

    -96

    II

    805649

    2048

    1192

    1,067

    531256

    1184

    22

    751

    316

    -33

    131-73-25

    -262

    54

    -511

    39

    -40

    -126

    -1

    032

    22

    50

    III'

    73244

    1760

    1064

    970

    491276

    1202

    731

    239

    -32

    -108-140-23

    -303

    -64

    -241 11

    26

    -42; -23

    -52

    -8

    2-42

    9

    -39

    155

    IV* Year

    770 3, 20853 2316 27

    17 7654 176

    102 4233 11

    1,005 4,152

    501 2, 14127 985 22

    li 5219 | 783

    3 92 7

    758 3, 065

    247 1,087

    38 i 138

    -66 -378-132; -395

    25! 92

    -261J -1,003

    -14J 84

    i

    -28| -193-2| -9 5j 97

    -19; -199- ' j

    -61 1 -368

    j

    1 -10

    1 315 124

    4 4

    2l! 121

    54 i 163

    1

    International institutions

    1951

    11

    55

    6

    63

    17

    32

    8

    57

    6

    -240

    -241

    -235

    1952

    I

    3

    12

    5

    20

    2

    2

    2

    6

    14

    -21

    -21

    -7

    -153 -6

    -12 -2

    -165J -8

    -19J -4

    3J 2

    24 \ (*)>

    -6 -34

    406J 49

    II

    1

    12

    13

    4

    w

    2

    6

    7

    -16

    -16q

    III'

    4

    12

    5

    21

    25

    328

    -7

    -3

    -3

    -10

    IV*>

    (*)

    13

    1

    14

    1

    3

    3

    7

    7

    -20

    -20

    -13

    -51 -11 -59(*) (') - --2 l l -1

    -53 -2 -60

    l i 12ii

    2 l! 126 97 j -434 -4! 4

    32 95^ -26

    30 -83 99

    Year

    44

    49

    11

    68

    7

    30

    10

    47

    21

    -60

    -6

    -39

    -117(*)-6

    -123

    9

    648

    4

    67

    95

    LineNo.

    123

    4567

    8

    91011

    1213

    1415

    16

    17

    18

    192021

    22

    23

    242526

    2728

    29

    30

    3132

    33

    34

    35

    2. Dependencies include Spanish dependencies.Source: U. S. Department of Commerce, Office of Business Economics,

    of tons, were 28 percent below those a year earlier. Forthe whole year, exports were smaller than in any otherpostwar year except 1950.

    Third, changing inventories of American products inforeign countries also influenced our exports. Inventories ofmanufactured goods as well as raw materials such as cottonand tobacco accumulated during the period of heavy exportsfrom this country which lasted until the middle of 1952.The lower exports during the second half of the year mayreflect either a decline of foreign purchases for inventorypurposes or, in some instances, inventory liquidations tomeet current demands.

    NOTE.Basic data for the years 1946 to 1951, in addition to detailed explanations of themethods used in estimating balance of payment data may be found in the Balance of Pay-ments 1949-51 supplement to the SURVEY OF CURRENT BUSINESS, published in November1952 and available at $1.25 at the United States Government Printing Office, Washington 25,D. C., or Department of Commerce Field Offices.

    Not only were cotton stocks large in consuming countriesrelative to current utilization at the middle of 1952, butsubstantial stocks had also accumulated in other producingcountries. At the end of the second quarter of 1952 cottonstocks in the United Kingdom amounted to nearly 14 months'consumption as compared with 6.7 months' supplies a yearearlier.

    Fourth, tightened exchange controls reduced purchases inthe United States, particularly by Brazil and to a lesserextent by the sterling area countries. Exports to Brazilalone declined from an annual rate of $748 million duringthe first half of 1952 to $336 million during the last quarter.The effect of exchange controls upon exports to the sterlingarea are less certain, since indirect controls, such as creditrestrictions, and declining incomes resulting from reduced

    Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

  • 10 SURVEY OF CURRENT BUSINESS

    [Millions of dollars]

    March 195

    Table 3.Balance of Payments of th

    Item

    Exports of goods and services: 1Merchandise, adjustedTransportation _ . _ _ _ _ _ _TravelMiscellaneous services:

    PrivateGovernment _ _

    Income on investments:PrivateGovernment

    TotalImports of goods and services:

    Merchandise, adjusted .TransportationTravel - .. ---Miscellaneous services:

    Private -G o vernment

    Income on investments:PrivateGovernment

    Total - -Balance on goods and services _ _Unilateral transfers (net) :

    PrivateGovernment:

    Economic aidMilitary aid __ _Other

    Total

    Balance on goods and services and unilateral transfers

    United States capital (net) :Private:

    Direct investmentsOther long-termShort-term

    Government:Long-termShort-term _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

    Total _

    Foreign capital (net) :Long-term:

    Transactions in United States Government bondsOther _ _ _ _

    Short-term

    Gold sales (purchases ( ))Balance on foreign capital and gold

    Transfers of funds between foreign areas (receipts fromother areas ( )) and errors and omissions.

    Total

    1951

    2, 3312.,f>

    27

    19317

    22588

    3,167

    2, 22618490

    18092

    1372

    2,911

    256

    -67

    -253(2)

    -6

    -326

    -70

    -63-14

    87

    -368

    -18

    -328968

    -514

    -389

    477

    1952

    Year I

    2,06923530

    20329

    23994

    2,899

    1,942232

    94

    173156

    1326

    2,735

    164

    -73

    -431(2)

    -511

    -347

    -2258

    -13012

    -84

    i 87! 3

    169

    -448

    -189

    ! 620

    73880

    5

    515

    59

    938

    5375119

    4336

    321

    719

    219

    -16

    -20(2)

    -2

    -38

    181

    -24

    14

    -52-1

    -70

    9

    117

    -521

    -398] 287

    II

    4886011

    485

    57()

    669

    5326726

    4339

    321

    740

    -71

    -16

    -162(2)

    -2

    -180

    -251

    n

    219

    -7815

    -52

    12-30

    22

    -11

    n

    310

    in>

    384458

    5213

    63(*)

    565

    4256432

    4439

    322

    638

    -73

    -16

    -144(2) 2-162

    -235

    19-127

    -37, 2

    6

    319

    65

    3

    108

    121

    IV*

    459506

    526

    6094

    727

    4485017

    4342

    362

    638

    89

    25

    -105(2)

    -1

    -131

    -42

    9-12-2

    37(*)

    32

    3527

    -35

    81

    108

    -98

    United Kingdom

    1951

    i91114311

    16015

    8988

    1,417

    48314837

    17862

    1342

    1,044

    373

    -32

    -218(2)

    -4

    -254

    119

    -26-680

    890

    137

    -3383

    5

    -464

    -419

    1G3

    1952

    Year

    68213813

    16813

    8190

    1,185

    57519441

    172106

    1286

    1,222

    -37

    -35

    -404(2)

    -443

    -480

    21 524

    56

    51

    860

    165

    -440

    -189

    618

    I

    24339

    2

    414

    24

    353

    157423

    4224

    311

    300

    53

    0

    -17(2)

    -26

    27

    13-314

    -2(*)

    22

    8-2

    | 139; 520

    -375

    i 326

    1II Illr IV P

    156 11937 30

    4 4

    40 443 3

    17 21

    257 221

    147 13158 5412 ! 19

    43 4427 26

    31 311 2

    319 i 307

    -62 -86

    -155 i -134(2) (2)

    -1 -1

    -163 ! -142

    -225 -228

    -4 9-3 -2-6 ; 16j

    -45 (*)13 -7

    -45 16

    12 31-31 7

    10 69

    (z)9 107

    279 105

    164323

    433

    1990

    354

    14040

    4329

    352

    296

    58

    -13

    -98(2)

    -112

    -54

    33

    (*) .52

    (*)58

    3526

    -53

    80

    88

    ! ~92

    export prices reduced domestic demand and consequentlyalso the need for direct import restrictions.

    Military expenditures risingForeign dollar receipts were also increased by Government

    expenditures abroad for goods and services, including1 "off-shore purchases/' troop expenditures, and our contributionsto "infrastructure" facilities for interallied use. The rise insuch expenditures started in Japan shortly after the invasionof South Korea. Expenditures in Japan declined, however,from the first to the second half of 1952 while those in West-ern Europe increased.

    Transactions in civilian services also increased foreigndollar receipts or reduced foreign dollar outlays. Foreignnet expenditures on transportation declined because of re-duced tonnage of exports from the United States, greaterparticipation of foreign vessels in the trade, lower freightrates and increased tourist travel on foreign carriers.

    Although tourist expenditures abroad were rising over theyear, foreign tourist expenditures in the United States rosenearly as much, leaving the balance virtually unchanged.

    Income on investments, however, appears to have declinedas compared with the previous year. Rising costs abroadincluding taxes, and either stable or in some cases decliningprices of the goods produced seem to have reduced the returnon our foreign investments.

    Marked change in unrecorded transactionsThe last major item which improved the financial position

    of foreign countries includes all those transactions which canonly be inferred from the difference between the known dollarreceipts and payments. These missing transactions ("Errorsand omissions'7) declined from net receipts of $433 millionduring the first half of 1952 to net payments of $195 millionin the second half. Although in several other postwar yearsthis item declined from the first to the second half, the changeby over $600 million was far more than had previously beenexperienced and may be assumed to reflect more than randomerrors and the lack of data for certain recurrent transactions.

    There have been three major shifts in this item since thewar, all of which seem to have been closely related to thechanging strength of the pound sterling. In each of these

    Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

  • March 1953

    United States With the Sterling Area

    SUEVEY OF CURRENT BUSINESS

    [Millions of dollars]

    11

    Other Western Europe

    6171

    1(*)(*)

    70

    173

    1952

    Year

    5341

    I

    203

    (*)

    II

    9(*)

    1

    (*) (') (*)(x) (*) (x)

    (X) (^2

    60 23 10

    24 10 54 1 14 2 ! (*) ; i

    (T) !4 3

    (z) (*}

    28 33

    (*) 1(X) (x)

    11 8

    42 27 12 2

    III r IV P

    10 14(z) 1(*) (*)c) i c)(X) (.)

    2

    Dependencies

    1952

    Year

    205 21130 205 6

    i

    5461

    6 7 2

    II

    5352

    1(X) (X) (X) (X)

    79 89(*}21 25

    i10 17 325 333 84 86

    j i j5 4 1 738 i 042 187 1821 1 i 11 14 31 (*) ! 42 ; 45

    i i

    8 6

    314 11

    (x) ' ( J ) (x,) f x }13 ! ' 1 4 3 3

    2 i 4i 1 i 1

    III--

    50422

    (*)22

    80

    1284

    11(x)

    41

    1

    806 719 208 200

    2 11 ! -481 -386 -124 j -114148

    -68

    ~9 -12 -2 -2 -3 -5 -13 -11 : -2 ; -3 -3

    2 2 ' 5 I 2 1 ^ 1 I I j(2) ! (2) (2) : (2) | (2) ; (2) (2) (2) (2) (2)(*) (x) (x) | (*) \ (*) \ (*) (*) (*) (*')-31 -17 -3 -4 1 -4 i -6 -13 -11

    11 10

    (*)

    9

    (*) (')

    -11 ! 1 (*)

    -2 -2 5

    (x) (x) (a-)

    -1-1 (*) (*) l - _ - : (*}

    12 -1 (*)

    9 0 1

    9 0 1

    -1 i (^

    -1 (*) ! (*)1

    -1 | (2) | (')

    i434 | -397

    6 348 1

    1 3

    11 201 (*)

    1 18

    6 2-19 6

    4 5

    -y I 13-8 -9 j -10 4 2 --5 502 | 368

  • 12 SURVEY OF CURRENT BUSINESS March 1953

    Offsetting in part the transactions which resulted in risingforeign dollar receipts were declines in Government economicgrants and loans and private capital movements. Govern-ment grants and loans are discussed in the following articlein this issue of the SURVEY. Various factors accounted forthe change in net loan disbursements between the first threequarters and the last quarter of the year. Loans under theMutual Security Act (10 percent of the aid under the fiscal1952 appropriation had to be given in loans), and theutilization of the second half of the $190 million grain loanto India provided most of the large disbursements duringthe first two quarters. The loan disbursements during thethird quarter include a $154 million advance by the Export-Import Bank to France against military contracts, of which$49 million was repaid by the end of the year. Annual loanrepayments of $50 million by the United Kingdom addedto the capital inflow during the last quarter of the year.

    Private investments declinePrivate capital movements declined during the year and

    were over $100 million smaller than in 1951. The declinefrom 1951 was concentrated in portfolio investments, mostlyin Canadian securities. Although direct investments in 1952were about $100 million higher than in 1951, the trend afterthe middle of the year was downward. Completion offacilities in the oil industry in Latin America and the MiddleEast appear to be a major factor in the decline. Increasedsupplies of oil and oil products in relation to demand mayalso have reduced the need for further expansion.

    Canada is the major area where large direct investmentsare still going forward. Development of oil and mineral de-posits appears to continue at previous rates, although therewas an apparent high point in the second quarter resultingfrom the sale of securities by American controlled Canadiancompanies to obtain funds for later investment.

    Temporary factors in reserve riseIn order to evaluate the significance of the changes in the

    balance of payments during 1952 it is important to examinewhether the developments which on balance facili tated therelatively large accumulation of foreign reserves are likely tobe temporary, or whether they may be expected to continuefor some time.

    The relatively greater rise in business activity in theUnited States as compared with foreign industrial nations isnot likely to continue to the same extent. Textile productionabroad, one of the major industries which held down overallforeign production, was again on the upswing at the end of theyear. This may indicate that the demand for textile rawmaterials, including cotton, was near bottom during the lastmonths of the year. At the same time, however, excesscapacity in the metal products industries appeared to berising in the United Kingdom. In the event that Britishindustries are successful in utilizing their excess capacity inthe metal products industries for increased exports, compe-tition for similar exports from the United States may well

    The decline in exports of coal to overseas countries duringthe second half of 1952 was in part due to temporary factors.However, large stocks of coal abroad will postpone the needfor imports even if the demand for coal should increase.

    The rise in wheat production from 1951 to 1952 in Europeand Canada was somewhat more than the average rise duringrecent years and may have been due in part to unusuallyfavorable weather conditions. Less favorable climatic con-ditions may again raise the demand for supplies from theUnited States. Inventories held abroad would, however,postpone an upturn in foreign purchases here, even if theforeign supply situation becomes less favorable.

    Possibly another temporary factor was the movement offunds abroad as reflected in the changes of unrecorded trans-actions. Not only is the amount of funds available for trans-fer abroad limited, particularly if business activity here re-mains at a high level, but the recent rise in short-term interestrates in this country has probably reduced the incentive forsuch transfers.

    The volume of merchandise imports required for currentuse in 1953 is likely to remain as high as in 1952, as long as theprospects for domestic business activity remain favorable.With a steady demand here and perhaps a rising demandabroad, prices of imported goods may not continue to declinebelow the last quarter of 1952 but even if prices stabilize atthe level of that period, they would average about 3-4 per-cent lowerin 1953 than in 1952.

    The major source from which foreign countries can expecthigher dollar receipts is military expenditures, which arelikely to increase as deliveries are made on contracts for mili-tary equipment previously placed.

    Government aid, other than military, may be expected tocontinue the downward trend which has been taking placesince 1949, although a temporary upturn of grants over therelatively low rate during the fourth quarter of 1952 is likely.Private investments, however, may not decline below therate during the second half of 1952, since, with the exceptionof Canada, the net outflow of funds for direct investmentshad already shrunk to an annual rate of less than $100 million.

    On balance, therefore, it appears that, with favorable cli-matic conditions abroad and continued favorable businessconditions in the United States, foreign countries should beable to raise their gold and dollar assets again in 1953, al-though probably at a slower rate. This tendency would befurther strengthened if those foreign countries which had re-duced their stocks of American goods, should resume theirpurchases, particularly of those goods which are essentialfor the continued operation of their economies. This mayapply even to those countries which restricted imports fromthe United States through exchange controls.

    Even if net dollar receipts by all foreign countries declineagain during the year, the portion accruing to the sterlingarea may continue to rise, as it did during the closing monthsof last year. The increase in foreign gold purchases whichstarted in December and which,had continued during thefirst months of this year reflected largely the shift in foreigndollar earnings to the sterling area. British reserves, moreso than those of most other countries, are usually held in goldrather than in the form of dollar deposits or other liquid dol-lar assets.

    Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

  • by E. S. Kerber

    United States Foreign Aid in 1952

    JL HE composition of United States Government foreign aidshifted during the course of 1952, with economic assistancedeclining and military aid rising. By the final quarter, mil-itary assistance was close to $1 billion, and made up overtwo-thirds of the gross foreign aid.

    Total gross aid of $5.6 billion was 10 percent more than inthe preceding year. For the entire year, military aidamounted to $2% billionalmost double the 1951 figureand comprised 49 percent of all gross aid.

    The reduction in economic assistance programed for thefiscal year beginning July 1951 was reflected in the actual aidprovided in 1952. Gross economic assistance contracted toless than half a billion dollars in the December quarter; ittotaled $2.8 billion for the calendar year as a wholeone-fifth less than in 1951.

    Net Foreign Aidmilitary M

    economic assistance by fh* end of 1952Of DOtUMtS

    .8

    NET ECONOMIC ANDTECHNICAL ASSISTANCE

    NET MILITARY AID

    I I I

    The emerging predominance of military aid is even morestrikingly portrayed on the basis of net foreign aid, as canbe seen in the accompanying chart. Net foreign aid, whichtakes into account the receipts by the United States Govern-ment of reverse grants and returns on grants, as well as therepayment of credits, was $5 billion in 1952.

    NOTEMR. KERBER IS A MEMBER OF THE CLEARING OFFICE FORFOREIGN TRANSACTIONS, OFFICE OF BUSINESS ECONOMICS.

    During the year Congress raised the required counterpartreturn for economic grants under the mutual-security pro-gram from 5 to 10 percent; in the last quarter, these counter-part collections showed a corresponding increase which re-duced net economic aid. Another major factor in the declineof net economic assistance in 1952 was the larger repaymentson postwar credits, several of which had terms deferringprincipal repayments until last year. Thus, in the lastquarter of 1952, credit repayments exceeded credit utiliza-tions by $107 million.Grants six-sevenths of total

    Grants continued to dominate foreign aid last year despitethe fact that credit utilizations doubled to comprise 15 per-cent of gross aid. As a result of the large credit repayments,net credit utilizations were $400 million, or 8 percent of theannual net foreign aid. This 1952 net credit utilization raisedto $10.7 billion foreign indebtedness on loans and othercredits made by the United States Government since thebeginning of World War II. The United States Governmentcollected $204 million in interest on this indebtedness in 1952.

    Most of the outstanding indebtedness was built up in theearly postwar period. Credit utilization constituted 38 per-cent of the gross aid in the postwar period prior to the Com-munist invasion of the Republic of Korea.

    Postwar aid $41 billionGross foreign aid for the postwar period through 1952

    totals $41 billion, exclusive of the Government's investmentof $3.4 billion in the International Bank for Reconstructionand Development and the International Monetary Fund.Net foreign aid in the same 7/^-year period totals nearly $38billion. At the present rate, net foreign aid since V-J Daywill soon exceed the total of the 5-year war period.

    Most of the foreign-aid programs of the United StatesGovernment were integrated into one mutual-securityprogram in 1951. Through the latter program the UnitedStates Government now provides aid to other nations in theeffort to improve their economic and military stability andsecurity. Mutual-security-program foreign aid includes mil-itary and economic and technical assistance.

    Mutual-security programAid furnished under the mutual-security program corn-

    prised 88 percent of gross foreign aid in 1952, in comparisonwith 86 percent in 1951 and 75 percent for comparable pro-grams in 1950. Under the coordination of the Director forMutual Security the nonmilitary or economic aid programsare operated for the most part by the Mutual Security Agencyand by the Technical Cooperation Administration of theState Department. Military aid is provided by the DefenseDepartment.

    The significant portions of foreign economic aid not pro-vided under the mutual-security program include the creditsof die Export-Import Bank, which accounted for 9 percent

    13

    Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

  • 14 SURVEY OF CURRENT BUSINESS March 1953

    of gross 1952 aid, and civilian-supply grants by the ArmyDepartment to Korea and the Ryukyu Islands.

    Western Europe major beneficiaryIn the last quarter of 1951, the European program for

    economic and technical assistance represented the largestindividual component and comprised one-half of gross foreignaid. A sharp decline has since occurred in European eco-nomic aid. In 1952 this segment represented less than one-third of gross foreign aid. In the final quarter it wasone-fifth.

    Nevertheless, Western Europe continued in 1952 to be thelargest beneficiary of United States Government foreign aid.It received mutual-security-program military aid totaling$2% billion in the year, double such aid in the preceding year.This total in the }^ear 1952 was more than the aggregate ofmilitary grants to the area in the entire preceding 6K-yearpostwar period.

    The doubling of military aid to the European countriesparticipating in the North Atlantic Treaty Organization(NATO) more than offset the $625-million decline in eco-nomic assistance to Western Europe in 1952. Gross foreignaid to the area amounted to $4% billion, up 14 percent.

    Military aid strengthens alliesMilitary aid provided to European countries in 1952 in-

    cluded $2,062 million representing shipment of actual militaryequipment, $83 million in services (including military train-ing) and $34 million for the ocean freight of the materialwhen carried on United States vessels.

    During the past calendar year the United States Govern-ment also contributed $73 million to NATO toward the costof fixed facilities which are needed for effective defense andwhich are used jointly by the integrated combat forces underthe NATO program. The United States is participatingwith Canada and eight other NATO nations in a multilateralfinancing of these common facilities.

    The total for the first three annual construction programsamounts to $739 million, of which the United States Govern-ment is to contribute $288 million. In December 1952 theNATO Council voted to build $230 million worth of thefourth annual program, and in February 1953 approval forthis fourth program was increased to $450 million. TheUnited States contribution to the December authorizationhas been announced as $92 million.

    Aid fosters European integrationThe United States programs for aid to Western Europe

    recognize the need to encourage and facilitate the mutualefforts of the European community to increase its defenseand economic status by political federation, military integra-tion, and economic unification. In the Mutual Security Actof 1952 the Congress specifically directed that the programshould be administered to support these ends. During 1952the High Authority for the European Coal and Steel Com-munity, joining the coal and steel industries of six continental

    NOTE.For a detailed description of aid furnished during the war period and the 5-year post-war period prior to the Korean invasion see the Foreign Aid supplement to the SURVEY OFCURRENT BUSINESS, published November 1952. Available at $1 from the Superintendent ofDocuments, Washington 25, D. C. or the various Department of Commerce Field Offices.

    nations, began operations. The treaty establishing theEuropean Defense Community was signed in May 1952 andis pending ratification by the participating nations. Con-gress has authorized the provision of military aid directly tothe European Defense Community.

    The European Payments Union (EPU), by which membersof the Organization for European Economic Cooperationengage in multilateral exchange clearance, received no directassistance from the United States Government in 1952. In1950 and 1951, payments of $43 million and $195 million,respectively, were made to EPU as part of mutual-security-program economic assistance. These funds constitute a con-tribution to the capital of EPU. Of the previous UnitedStates Government pledge to the capital fund, $123 millionwas still available at the end of 1952. Although no addi-tional capital contributions were made to EPU in 1952, over$135 million was granted as United States Government eco-nomic aid to Austria, Greece, Iceland, Turkey, and theUnited Kingdom to assist these countries in meeting theirobligations to EPU.

    Country changesDeclines were effected in the economic aid furnished to

    most European countries in 1952. The decreases rangedfrom 23 percent for Yugoslavia to 84 percent for Denmark.The contraction in economic aid followed the general eco-nomic recovery throughout Europe. Gold and dollar re-sources of Western European countries (excluding Switzer-land and the United Kingdom) rose from $4J4 billion to $5/2billion during the year. Early in 1953 the Netherlandsannounced that it would not require any fiscal year 1953allotments, in view of the improvement in its hard-currencyposition.

    Ireland and Sweden received almost no aid at all in the lastyear, in contrast to the approximately $25 million each hadbeen furnished in 1951. Allotments of mutual-security-program economic aid were terminated for these two nationsbeginning with fiscal year 1952.

    On the other hand, nonmilitary aid to Turkey increased 15percent. Spain, with postwar aid confined to credit utiliza-tions in 1951 and 1952, drew more in the latter yearprinci-pally from the special $62X-tnillion congressional loanauthorization made as part of the mutual-security-programappropriation in September 1950.

    Gross economic aid to France and the United Kingdomrose during the past year. The total to these two countriesconstituted half of the economic assistance aiforced WesternEurope.

    United Kingdom again receives large aidThe United Kingdom in 1951 dropped from the position of

    the largest recipient of United States Government economicassistance, in consequence of the almost complete cessation ofaid allocations for that country after December 31, 1950.However, that nation experienced an adverse shift in its netdollar and gold position in the last six months of 1951, sus-taining a drain of over $1/2 billion upon its gold and dollarresources. During this period the United Kingdom sold$950 million in gold to the United States.

    Despite restrictions of dollar imports and other controlsexercised by the British Commonwealth countries in thesterling area, continuing deterioration made necessary a

    Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

  • March 1953 SUEVEY OF CURKENT BUSINESS 15Table 1.Summary of Foreign Aid (Grants and Credits), by Program: July 1, 1945, Through Dec. 31, 1952

    [Millions of dollars]

    Program

    Gross foreign aid *Grants utilizedLess: Credit-agreement offsets to

    grants - _ .Credits utilized- _

    I^ess: ReturnsReverse grants and returns on grants .Principal collected on credits. _ .

    Equals: Net foreign aid __Net grants -- -Net credits

    Grants utilizedLend-lease -,Mutual security:

    Economic and technical assist-ance

    Military aid 2Civilian suppliesUNRRA, post-UNRRA, and in-

    terim aid _ . _ _ _ . _ .Philippine rehabilitationGreek-Turkish aidChinese stabilization and military

    aid -Other ---

    Reverse grants and returns on grantsReverse lend-iease _ . _ __Return of lend-lease shipsWar-account cash settlements-..Counterpart funds:

    Economic and technical assist-ance

    Military aid -- -Credits utilized

    British loan _Export-Import Bank (for own ac-

    count) -- -Direct loansLoans through agent banks. _

    Surplus property (including mer-chant ships)

    Credit-agreement offsets to grants-Lend-lease (excluding settlement

    credits)Mutual security (including loans to

    Spain and India) -- -Other

    Principal collected on creditsBritish loanExport-Import Bank (for own ac-

    count)Direct loansLoans through agent banks _ _

    Surplus property (including mer-chant ships) _ _ _ _ _ _

    Credit-agreement offsets to grantsLend-lease (excluding settlement

    credits) _ _ .Other 6

    Totalpostwarperiod

    41,03430, 247

    1,25612, 044

    3,422

    1,2302,191

    37,612

    27, 7609,852

    30,247

    1,932

    12, 7114,6875,340

    3,443634659

    243597

    1,230

    133370120

    59116

    12, 044

    3,750

    3,4153, 237

    127

    1,4871,256

    71

    1,608458

    2,191

    90

    1,125953172

    27662

    40600

    BeforeKorean

    invasion

    28, 15918, 824

    1,25610, 5912,178

    8741, 304

    25,98116, 6939,287

    15,8241,932

    7,00463

    4,5643,443

    519636238426874133287120

    3331

    10,5913,7502,6512,498

    1531,4841,256

    69990390

    1,304

    6324821491232221

    507

    After Korean invasion

    Total

    12,87511, 423

    1,4521,243

    356887

    11,63111, 067

    56511,423

    5,7074,624

    776

    115235

    171

    356

    83

    25815

    1,452

    763789

    *Cr 262

    2

    61767

    887

    9049347023

    153401993

    July-De-cember

    1950

    2,2232,021

    201217

    65152

    2,0061,956

    502,021

    1,189402257

    100152

    5665

    633

    201

    8184

    * C r 3

    (3)

    (3)7842

    152

    887414

    251

    633

    1951

    Total

    5,0744,646

    428452140312

    4,6224,506

    1164,646

    2,6681,484

    366

    1293

    105140

    23

    1106

    428

    204222

    5 Cr 182

    20913

    31244

    134130

    55621

    749

    January-March

    1,2361,114

    122

    103

    3964

    1,133

    1, 07558

    1,114

    64730690

    43

    (3)6439

    10

    271

    122

    79835 C r 4

    (3)

    394

    64

    31301

    2211

    10

    April-June

    1,383

    1,287

    96843549

    1,2991,252

    47

    1,287

    690414148

    432

    2635

    332

    96

    6681

    Cr 151

    254

    49

    19182

    131

    (3)16

    July-Sep-tember

    1,2501,146

    104

    117

    3384

    1,133

    1,11419

    1,146

    62243081

    23

    (3)8

    33

    303

    104

    oo

    CO CO

    704

    84

    33321

    11135

    23

    October-December

    1,2051,098

    106

    14834

    114

    1,0561,064

    -81,098

    70833546

    11

    (3)

    34

    13

    201

    106

    2828

    (3)1

    752

    114

    44

    51502

    127

    (3)

    1952

    Total

    5,5784,756

    823

    574151423

    5,0044,605

    3994,756

    1,8502,739

    154

    4(4)

    10151

    60

    856

    823

    478483

    * C r 5

    2

    33112

    423

    45271267

    471186

    12

    January-March

    1,088885

    203

    902763

    998858140

    885

    382457

    44

    1(*)

    1

    27

    2

    222

    203

    7980

    * C r 2

    2

    1212

    63

    46451

    13(3)

    13

    April-June

    1,5371,291

    246137

    7562

    1,4001,216

    184

    1,291

    59565143

    1(4)

    1

    75

    58

    17(3)

    246

    106106

    (3)

    1354

    62

    39382

    15(3)(3)

    July-Sep-tember

    1,5231,215

    30914822

    126

    1,3751,193

    182

    1,215

    52165041

    2

    1

    22

    (3)

    202

    309

    2442476 C r 3

    624

    126

    8686

    (3)2811

    (3)

    October-December

    1,4301,365

    6519927

    172

    1,2311,338 107

    1,365

    352981

    26

    (3)

    7

    27

    261

    65

    4949

    (3)

    142

    1724599981

    1675

  • 16 SURVEY OF CURRENT BUSINESS MarchTable 2.Summary of Foreign Aid (Grants and Credits), by Major Country: July 1, 1945, Through Dec. 31, 1952

    [Millions of dollars j

    Major country !

    Gross foreign aid (grants and credits) 2 _ .Less: Returns, _ . __ . ..Equals: Net foreign aidWestern Europe and dependent areas:

    Gross foreign aid - - _ ... -Less: ReturnsEquals: Net foreign aidAustria:

    Gross foreign aidLoss* ReturnsEquals: Net foreign aid

    Belgium - Luxem bourg :Gross foreign a idLess: Returns . - -Equals: Net foreign aid _

    British Commonwealth: UnitedKingdom :

    Gross foreign aidLess* ReturnsEquals* Net foreign aid

    Denmark:Gross foreign aid _ . .Lpss' ReturnsEquals: Net foreign a id .___

    Finland:Gross foreign aidLess* ReturnsEquals' Net foreign aid

    France:Gross foreign aid.Less* Returns --Equals* Net foreign aid

    Germany:Gross foreign aidLess* ReturnsEquals: Net foreign aid_

    Greece:Gross foreign aidLess* Returns _-Equals' Net foreign aid

    Iceland:Gross foreign aid .Less- Returns . _.Equals' Net foreign aid

    Ireland:Gross foreign aidLess: Returns _Equals' Net foreign aid

    Italy:Gross foreign aidLess* ReturnsEquals' Net foreign aid _ , _

    Netherlands:Gross foreign aid ....Les^' ReturnsEquals: Net foreign aid-

    Norway:Gross foreign aid ..Less1 Returns ,Equals' Not foreign aid

    Portugal :Gross foreign. -u< 1Le^s: ReturnsE qua Is : N et foreign aid - .

    Spain:Gross and net foreign aid

    Sweden:Gross foreign aidLess: Returns .Equals: Net foreign aid

    Trieste:Gross foreign aid . _Less: Returns..Equals: Net foreign aid

    Turkey:Gross foreign aidLess: ReturnsEquals: Net foreign a id _ -

    Yugoslavia:Gross foreign aidLess: Returns .Equals: Net foreign aid

    See footnotes at end of table.

    Total ipostwarperiod

    41,0343,422

    37,612

    30, 1282,213

    27, 915

    1,01358

    950

    80668

    738

    7,441882

    6, 559

    29116

    275

    1283791

    5, 070438

    4, 631

    3,891173

    3,718

    1. 58785

    1 502

    281

    26

    1471

    146

    2, 64716S

    2, 478

    1. 243185

    1, 058

    32848

    i 281

    47 2

    45

    i 41

    ! 112! 3i 109

    1 4H1 9

    44j! 398i 38i 360

    525I 8518

    Before iKorean

    T ,invasion

    Tota] J

    ^

    1i

    28, 159 12, 8752,178 1,243

    25,981 11,631

    20, 500 9, 6281 194 1,019

    19,306 8.609

    722 29125 32

    697 259

    634 17234 33

    600 139

    6, 445 997652 231

    5, 793 766i\ I193 99

    8 8185 91

    128 (3)27 10101 -10

    3.877 1,192166 273

    3. 712 920

    3. 139 75282 91

    3. 057 061

    1,173 414i 32 54! 1.142 360

    ,0 17(3) 1

    10 16

    99 48(?) ! 1 ...

    99 47

    : 2, 024 62375 93

    1 . 949 530

    ; 906 336

    ; 50 135857 201

    215 11423 25

    : 192 89i i

    5 42(3) 2

    5 -10

    i