Scattering Experiment Monoenergetic particle beam Beam impinges on a target Particles are scattered...

30
Manuel Calderón de la Barca Sánchez Intro. Relativistic Heavy Ion Collisions Cross Sections and Collision Geometry

Transcript of Scattering Experiment Monoenergetic particle beam Beam impinges on a target Particles are scattered...

Page 1: Scattering Experiment Monoenergetic particle beam Beam impinges on a target Particles are scattered by target Final state particles are observed by detector.

Manuel Calderón de la Barca Sánchez

Intro. Relativistic Heavy Ion Collisions

Cross Sections and Collision Geometry

Page 2: Scattering Experiment Monoenergetic particle beam Beam impinges on a target Particles are scattered by target Final state particles are observed by detector.

2

The cross section: Experimental Meaning

Scattering Experiment

Monoenergetic particle beam

Beam impinges on a target

Particles are scattered by target

Final state particles are observed by detector at q.

Page 3: Scattering Experiment Monoenergetic particle beam Beam impinges on a target Particles are scattered by target Final state particles are observed by detector.

3

Beam characteristics: Flux

Flux :Number of particles/ unit area / unit timeArea: perpendicular to beam

For a uniform beam: particle density

Number of particles / unit volume

Consider box in Figure.Box has cross sectional area a.Particles move at speed v with respect to target.Make length of box

a particle entering left face just manages to cross right face in time Dt.

Volume of Box:

So Flux

Page 4: Scattering Experiment Monoenergetic particle beam Beam impinges on a target Particles are scattered by target Final state particles are observed by detector.

4

Target: Number of Scattering Centers

How many targets are illuminated by the beam?

Multiple nuclear targets within area a

Target Density,Number of targets per kg:

Recall: 1 mol of a nuclear species A will weigh A grams. i.e. the atomic mass unit and Avogadro’s number are inverses:(NA x u) = 1 g/mol

So:

L

Area a

Density r

Page 5: Scattering Experiment Monoenergetic particle beam Beam impinges on a target Particles are scattered by target Final state particles are observed by detector.

5

Incident Flux and Scattering Rate

Scattered rate: Proportional to

Incident Flux, Nt

size (and position) of detector

For a perfect detector :

Constant of proportionality:Dimensional analysis:Must have units of Area. Cross Section

L

Area a

Density r

Page 6: Scattering Experiment Monoenergetic particle beam Beam impinges on a target Particles are scattered by target Final state particles are observed by detector.

6

Differential Scattering cross section

For a detector subtending solid angle dW

If the detector is at an angle q from the beam, with the origin at the target location:

Page 7: Scattering Experiment Monoenergetic particle beam Beam impinges on a target Particles are scattered by target Final state particles are observed by detector.

7

Physical Meaning of stot.Compute:

Fraction of particles that are scatteredArea a contains Nt scattering centers

Total number of incident particles (per unit time)

Ni=Fa

Total number of scattered particles (per unit time)

Ns=F Nt stot

So Fraction of particles scattered is:Ns/Ni =F Nt stot / (F a) = Nt stot / a

Cross section: effective area of scatteringLorentz invariant: it is the same in CM or Lab.

For colliders, Luminosity:Rate:

Page 8: Scattering Experiment Monoenergetic particle beam Beam impinges on a target Particles are scattered by target Final state particles are observed by detector.

8

Interaction Cross Section: Theory

Quantum Mechanics: Fermi’s (2nd) Golden Rule

Calculation of transition ratesIn simplest form: QM perturbation theory

Golden Rule: particles from an initial state a scatter to a final state b due to an interaction Hamiltonian Hint with a rate given by:

sdNL

dt

Page 9: Scattering Experiment Monoenergetic particle beam Beam impinges on a target Particles are scattered by target Final state particles are observed by detector.

Quantum Case: Yukawa PotentialQuantum theory of interaction between nucleons

1949 Nobel Prize

Limit m → ∞.Treat scattering of particle as interaction with static potential.

Interaction is spin dependentFirst, simple case: spin-0 boson exchange

Klein-Gordon Equation

Static case (time-independent):

9

Page 10: Scattering Experiment Monoenergetic particle beam Beam impinges on a target Particles are scattered by target Final state particles are observed by detector.

10

Observables: From theory to experiment

Steps to calculating and observable:Amplitude: f = Probability ~ |f|2 .

Example:Non-Relativistic quantum mechanicsAssume a is small.

Perturbative expansion in powers of a.

Problem: Find the amplitude for a particle in state with momentum qi to be scattered to final state with momentum qf by a potential Hint(x)=V(x).

Page 11: Scattering Experiment Monoenergetic particle beam Beam impinges on a target Particles are scattered by target Final state particles are observed by detector.

11

Propagator: Origins of QFT.

q = momentum transferq = qi - qf

Page 12: Scattering Experiment Monoenergetic particle beam Beam impinges on a target Particles are scattered by target Final state particles are observed by detector.

12

Structure of propagator

QFT case, recover similar form of propagator!Applies to single particle exchange

Lowest order in perturbation theory.Additional orders: additional powers of a.

Numerator:product of the couplings at each vertex.

g2, or a.

Denominator:Mass of exchanged particle.Momentum transfer squared: q2.

In relativistic case: 4-momentum transfer squared qmqm=q2.

Plug into Fermi’s 2nd Golden Rule:Obtain cross sections

Page 13: Scattering Experiment Monoenergetic particle beam Beam impinges on a target Particles are scattered by target Final state particles are observed by detector.

13

Cross Section in Nuclear Collisions

Nuclear forces are short rangeRange for Yukawa Potential R~1/Mx

Exchanged particles are pions: R~1/(140 MeV)~1.4 fm

Nuclei interact when their edges are ~ 1fm apart0th Order: Hard sphere

Bradt & Peters formula b decreases with increasing Amin

J.P. Vary’s formula: Last term: curvature effects on nuclear surfaces

R2R1

Page 14: Scattering Experiment Monoenergetic particle beam Beam impinges on a target Particles are scattered by target Final state particles are observed by detector.

14

Cross Sections at Bevalac

So:

Bevalac DataFixed TargetBeam: ~few Gev/A AGS, SPS: works too

Bonus question:Intercept: 7mb½

What is r0?Hints: 1 b = 100 fm2, √0.1=0.316, √π=1.772

Page 15: Scattering Experiment Monoenergetic particle beam Beam impinges on a target Particles are scattered by target Final state particles are observed by detector.

15

Colliders: Van der Meer Scan

Vernier ScanInvented by S. van der Meer

Sweep the beams across each other, monitor the counting rateObtain a Gaussian curve, peak at smallest displacementDoing horizontal and vertical sweeps:

zero-in on maximum rate at zero displacement

Luminosity for two beams with Gaussian profile

1,2 : blue, yellow beamNi: number of particles per bunch

Assumes all bunches have equal intensity

Exponential: Applies when beams are displaced by d

Page 16: Scattering Experiment Monoenergetic particle beam Beam impinges on a target Particles are scattered by target Final state particles are observed by detector.

16

RHIC Results: BBC X-section

van der Meer Scan. A. Drees et al., Conf.Proc. C030512 (2003) 1688

Cross Section:

STAR:

Page 17: Scattering Experiment Monoenergetic particle beam Beam impinges on a target Particles are scattered by target Final state particles are observed by detector.

17

Total and Elastic Cross Sections

World Data on pp total and elastic cross sectionPDG: http://pdg.arsip.lipi.go.id/2009/hadronic-xsections/hadron.html

RHIC, 200 GeV

tot~50 mb

el~8 mb

nsd=42 mb

LHC, 7 TeV

tot=98.3±2.8 mb

el=24.8±1.2 mb

nsd=73.5 +1.8 – 1.3 mb (TOTEM, Europhys.Lett. 96 (2011) 21002)

CERN-HERA Parameterization

Page 18: Scattering Experiment Monoenergetic particle beam Beam impinges on a target Particles are scattered by target Final state particles are observed by detector.

18

Important Facts on Cross Sections

Froissart Bound, Phys. Rev. 123, 1053–1057 (1961)

Marcel Froissart: Unitarity, Analiticityrequire the strong interaction cross sections to grow at most as for

Particles and AntiparticlesCross sections converge for

Simple relation between pion-nucleon and nucleon-nucleon cross sections

Page 19: Scattering Experiment Monoenergetic particle beam Beam impinges on a target Particles are scattered by target Final state particles are observed by detector.

19

Nuclear Cross Sections: Glauber Model

Page 20: Scattering Experiment Monoenergetic particle beam Beam impinges on a target Particles are scattered by target Final state particles are observed by detector.

20

Nuclear Charge Densities

Charge densities: similar to a hard sphere.Edge is “fuzzy”.

Page 21: Scattering Experiment Monoenergetic particle beam Beam impinges on a target Particles are scattered by target Final state particles are observed by detector.

21

For the Pb nucleus (used at LHC)

Woods-Saxon density: R = 1.07 fm * A 1/3

a =0.54 fmA = 208 nucleons

Probability :

Page 22: Scattering Experiment Monoenergetic particle beam Beam impinges on a target Particles are scattered by target Final state particles are observed by detector.

22

Nuclei: A bunch of nucleons

Each nucleon is distributed with:

Angular probabilities:Flat in f, flat in cos(q).

Page 23: Scattering Experiment Monoenergetic particle beam Beam impinges on a target Particles are scattered by target Final state particles are observed by detector.

23

Impact parameter distribution

Like hitting a target:

Rings have more area

Area of ring of radius b, thickness db:

Area proportional to probability

Page 24: Scattering Experiment Monoenergetic particle beam Beam impinges on a target Particles are scattered by target Final state particles are observed by detector.

24

Collision:2 Nuclei colliding

Red: nucleons from nucleus A

Blue: nucleons from nucleus B

M.L.Miller, et al. Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 2007.57:205-243

Page 25: Scattering Experiment Monoenergetic particle beam Beam impinges on a target Particles are scattered by target Final state particles are observed by detector.

25

Interaction Probability vs. Impact Parameter, b

After 100,000 events

Beyond b~2R Nuclei miss each other

Note fuzzy edge

Largest probability:Collision at b~12-14 fm

Head on collisions:b~0: Small probability

Page 26: Scattering Experiment Monoenergetic particle beam Beam impinges on a target Particles are scattered by target Final state particles are observed by detector.

26

Binary Collisions, Number of participants

If two nucleons get closer than d< / s p they collide.Each colliding nucleon is a “participant” (Dark colors)Count number of binary collisions.Count number of participants

Page 27: Scattering Experiment Monoenergetic particle beam Beam impinges on a target Particles are scattered by target Final state particles are observed by detector.

27

Find Npart, Ncoll, b distributions

Nuclear Collisions

Page 28: Scattering Experiment Monoenergetic particle beam Beam impinges on a target Particles are scattered by target Final state particles are observed by detector.

28

From Glauber to Measurements

Multiplicty Distributions in STAR

MCBS, Ph.D ThesisPhys.Rev.Lett. 87 (2001) 112303

Page 29: Scattering Experiment Monoenergetic particle beam Beam impinges on a target Particles are scattered by target Final state particles are observed by detector.

29

Comparing to Experimental data:CMS example

Each nucleon-nucleon collision produces particles.

Particle production: negative binomial distribution.

Particles can be measured: tracks, energy in a detector.CMS: Energy deposited by Hadrons in “Forward” region

Page 30: Scattering Experiment Monoenergetic particle beam Beam impinges on a target Particles are scattered by target Final state particles are observed by detector.

30

Centrality Table in CMS

From CMS MC Glauber model. CMS: HIN-10-001,

JHEP 08 (2011) 141