SBS Budget A Staged Approach
description
Transcript of SBS Budget A Staged Approach
SBS Budget A Staged Approach
John J. LeRose
Hall A Collaboration Meeting
December 10, 2010
2
Start with the nuts and boltsIf you really want to see the whole budget see:
http://www.jlab.org/~lerose/sbs/2nd_go_around/final/Budget_StageA_StageB-Final.xlsx
• The Super Bigbite Project is designed to provide precision measurements of the nucleon form factors GEn, GMn and GEp to unprecedented values of Q2, and to enable a greatly expanded program of DIS experiments.
• The first stage, for $1.8M, will be comprised of: - Fully approved: GEn (50 days) and GMn (25 days).
• The second stage is for $2.3M. The second stage will open the door to a large group of Super Bigbite experiments including:
- Fully approved: GEp to 15 GeV2 (45days), - Conditionally approved: SIDIS: Transversity for 3He(e,e’π/K),
high-x u/d ratio using T & 3He- In planning stages: A1n (high Q2), DIS(e,e’ϕ), Transversity in
(e,e’πo), PVDIS w 70 msr,, and GEn and Fπ using a neutron polarimeter.
3
A Staged approach to the Super Bigbite Project
The layout of the Super Bigbite apparatus with all components for GEp(5)
Scattering
chamber
Vacuum
snout
Magnetic shield
First tracke
r
Second tracker Hadron calorimete
r
Beam line Pb shield
48D48 magnet
Third tracker
CH2 analyzerBeam
4
Stage I ofThe Super Bigbite
programfollowing the 12 GeV upgrade
5
Hall A GEn (E12-09-016) will provide dramatic new insight into nucleon structure
• The dramatic turnover of the Argonne DSE model would be clearly visible.
• If the turnover is seen, it would provide strong evidence for the importance of diquark degrees of freedom in the nucleon form factors.6
Hall A GMn (E12-09-19) will provide superb accuracy
• WILL GREATLY IMPROVE THE ACCURACY WITH WHICH GMn KNOWN, AND IS ESSENTIAL FOR EXTRACTING GEn, F1, F2 AND DOING FLAVOR DECOMPOSITIONS.
• COMPARED TO HALL B, WILL ACHIEVE SUPERIOR ACCURACY IN HALF THE TIME, WITH INDEPENDENT SYSTEMATIC ERRORS.
7
48D48 magn
et
Hadron calorimeter
GEM-based “First
trackers”
Single-axis GEM tracker
•Magnetic: - beam-line cut, power, support
platform - but without new coils, lead
shielding •Hadron calorimeter•GEM-based veto in front of
hadron calorimeter.• INFN funded GEM-based
“First tracker” from SBS
BigBite
8
The layout of the Super Bigbite apparatus necessary for the Neutron FFs
48D48 magn
et
Hadron calorimet
er
GEM-based “First
trackers”
Single-axis GEM tracker
TOSCA calculation was performed
and showed that single coil solution is quite adequate for both GEn and
GMn
9
The layout of the Super Bigbite apparatus necessary for the Neutron FFs
Stage I Budget for Super Bigbite
10
Item Institution
2011 2012 2013 Total
Magnet, DC power, Beam line and university contracts overhead
JLab $298 k $243 k $416 k $957 k
Hadron Calorimeter CMU $110 k $193 k -- $303 k
Coordinate detector UVa $255 k $282 k -- $537 k
Total $663 k $718 k $416 k $1,797 k
Item Source AmountSBS Front GEM Tracker INFN $1,050 k (720 k Euro)
Clean room and DAQ electronics UVa match $50 K
Readout Chips UVa on hand $ 10 k
Total non-DOE contributions $1,110 k
Non-DOE contributions
DOE contributions
Jlab Contribution $1,797 k
Non-DOE contributions $1,110 k
Total Stage I Budget $2,907 k
Stage I DOE funds spent at JLab
11
Item 2011 2012 2013 TotalMagnet $223 k $58 k $252 k $533 k
DC Power 0 $35 k $164 k $199 k
Beam Line $35 k $35 k 0 $70 k
Detector Supports 0 $75 k 0 $75 k
university contracts overhead $40 k $40 k 0 $80 k
Total $298 k $243 k $416 k $957 k
Stage II ofThe Super Bigbite program
following the 12 GeV upgrade
12
• The second stage comprising a measurement of GEp and more can be completed for an additional $2.3M. The second stage will open the door to a large group of Super Bigbite experiments including:
- Fully approved: GEp to 15 GeV2 (45 days)- Conditionally approved: SIDIS: Transversity for 3He(e,e’π/K),
high-x u/d ratio using T & 3He- In planning stages: A1n (high Q2), DIS(e,e’ϕ), Transversity in
(e,e’πo), PVDIS w 70 msr,, and GEn and Fπ using a neutron polarimeter.
• The proton form factor, according to the most recent NSAC LRP, “... remains the only source of information about quark distributions at small transverse distance scales."
• Super Bigbite is the only way to obtain good accuracy at the necessary Q2
scaling with
existing equipmen
t and roughly half the
time
The 12 GeV GEp/GMp Experiment
• Super Bigbite, together with Bigbite, is the only way to push A1n to x=0.8.
• Super Bigbite is currently conditionally approved as the basis for the tritium expt.
Key Goals of the 12 GeV Program
E99-117
6.6 GeV
8.8 GeV
11 GeV
The 12 GeV A1n Experiment
stage II budget for super bigbite
16
Project Project Executio
n
2013 2014 2015 Total
New coils for magnet, Beam line, detector supports, and university contracts overhead
JLab $40 k $649 k $136 k $825 k
Polarimeter GEM chambers UVa $313 k $369 k $190 k $872 k
GEM Readout NSU $246 k $165 k 0 $411 k
GEM mechanics W&M 0 $72 k 0 $72 K
Trigger Rutgers 0 $19 k $146 k $165 k
Total JLab contribution $599 k $1,274 k $472 k $2,345 k
Time line of DOE expenditures
17
Stage I + Stage II Total cost to DOE : $ 4,142 k Total non-DOE contributions: $ 1,110 k + Labor
2,011 2,012 2,013 2,014 2,015 2,016$0 k
$500 k
$1,000 k
$1,500 k SBS Total Expenditures by YearFY11 Dollars
Stage IStage II
Status of the Budget• The presented budget is how we would like things to
work out
• The plan has been presented to and been warmly received by Lab Management
• Lab Management has promised to present the case to DOE
• At this point the actual budget is all conjecture!