Satoyama woodland management

83
Satoyama woodland management and mass mortality of oak trees ITÔ, Hiroki Forestry and Forest Products Research Institute 2014-10-23

description

Satoyama woodland management and mass mortality of oak trees in Japan

Transcript of Satoyama woodland management

Page 1: Satoyama woodland management

Satoyama woodland management and mass

mortality of oak trees

ITÔ, HirokiForestry and Forest Products Research Institute

2014-10-23

Page 2: Satoyama woodland management

Satoyama as

• Woodlands

• Landscapes

• Systems

Page 3: Satoyama woodland management

Satoyama woodlands

Page 4: Satoyama woodland management

19c. KyôtoOgura (2011)

Page 5: Satoyama woodland management

Overuse

Underuse

Page 6: Satoyama woodland management

Satoyama landscapesTakeuchi (2003)

Page 7: Satoyama woodland management

Satoyama systemsFukamachi and Oku (2011)

Page 8: Satoyama woodland management

Satoyama woodlands• Satoyama woodlands had been maintained to obtain

charcoal woods, fuel woods, green manure and other materials.

• Most of them were managed as pine forests or as coppices that were consisted of oaks.

• Most of them have been abandoned from 1960–70s because fossil fuel replaced charcoal and fuel woods.

• After 1990s, mass mortality of oak trees has expanded in Japan.

Page 9: Satoyama woodland management

Some Satoyama woodlands are still

managed as coppices

Page 10: Satoyama woodland management
Page 11: Satoyama woodland management
Page 12: Satoyama woodland management
Page 13: Satoyama woodland management

Charcoal

Page 14: Satoyama woodland management

Bed logs for mushroom cultivation

Page 15: Satoyama woodland management

Coppices in EnglandRackham (1986)

Page 16: Satoyama woodland management

Coppice management and species abundance

in floor vegetation

Page 17: Satoyama woodland management

Study site

Inagawa Town

Page 18: Satoyama woodland management

Coppice still managed

Page 19: Satoyama woodland management

Coppice still managed

Page 20: Satoyama woodland management

Stump

Page 21: Satoyama woodland management

Pollard

Page 22: Satoyama woodland management

Abandoned broadleaved forest

Page 23: Satoyama woodland management

Abandoned pine forest

Page 24: Satoyama woodland management

Coppice had more plant species in floor vegetation than abandoned forests (Itô et al. 2010)

Stand type

No.

spe

cies

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

1 2 3 4 5

year

2006

2007

2008

Cleared in 2007

Cleared in 2005

Cleared in 2001

Broad-leaved Pine

Coppices Abandoned forests

Stand type

Page 25: Satoyama woodland management

Light-demanding herbaceous species can survive on coppice floor

Page 26: Satoyama woodland management

Siphonostegia laetaオオヒキヨモギ, Red-listed (VU)

Page 27: Satoyama woodland management

Monochasma sheareriクチナシグサ

Page 28: Satoyama woodland management

Tricyrtis affinisヤマジノホトトギス

Page 29: Satoyama woodland management

Simulation• Itô et al. (2012) constructed a simple simulation model to estimate

fluctuations of floor species abundance with 6 conditions:

• A: 1 of 10 stands were cleared each year

• B: 10 of 10 stands were simultaneously cleared every decade

• C: 5 of 10 stands were cleared every 5 years

• D: 10 of 10 stands were cleared each year

• E: abandoned broadleaved forest left unmanaged

• F: abandoned pine forest left unmanaged

Page 30: Satoyama woodland management

1 2 3 4 5

6 7 8 9 10

10 10 10 10 10

10 10 10 10 10

1 1 1 1 1

6 6 6 6 6

1 1 1 1 1

1 1 1 1 1

A: 1 of 10 stands were cleared each year

B: 10 of 10 stands were simultaneously cleared every decade

C: 5 of 10 stands were cleared every 5 years

D: 10 of 10 stands were cleared each year

Page 31: Satoyama woodland management

Result of the simulation suggested that shifting mosaic (A and C) would keep richer species in

floor (Itô et al., 2012).

Year

Expe

cted

num

ber o

f spe

cies

40

60

80

100

40

60

80

100

A

D

5 10 15 20

B

E

5 10 15 20

C

F

5 10 15 20

Itô et al. Fig.2

Page 32: Satoyama woodland management

Summary

• Coppices under management can hold more floor species than abandoned forests.

• Shifting mosaic can keep stable floor species abundance.

Page 33: Satoyama woodland management

Mass mortality of oak trees

Page 34: Satoyama woodland management

Expansion of the mortality(Kuroda, 2008)

~1980 ~2007

Page 35: Satoyama woodland management

Damaged volume of oak trees

0

10

20

30

40

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

Stem

vol

ume

(×10

4 m3 )

Year(Forestry agency of Japan, 2014)

Page 36: Satoyama woodland management

Cause

• The mortality is caused by a species of fungi (Raffaelea quercivora), which is dispersed by a species of beetle (Platypus quercivorus).

• Abandonment of Satoyama woodlands would affect it indirectly.

Page 37: Satoyama woodland management

Platypus quercivorushttps://www.ffpri.affrc.go.jp/labs/seibut/bcg/bcg00039.html

Page 38: Satoyama woodland management
Page 39: Satoyama woodland management
Page 40: Satoyama woodland management
Page 41: Satoyama woodland management
Page 42: Satoyama woodland management
Page 43: Satoyama woodland management

Mortality of oak species

Quercus crispula Quercus serrata

Fagus is not vulnerable.

Evergreen Quercus (eg. Q. glauca) and Castanopsis are also influenced.

>

Page 44: Satoyama woodland management

Case studies in Kansai area

• We studied 3 sites.

• Regeneration?

• What species are regenerating after the mass mortality?

Page 45: Satoyama woodland management

KeihokuKutuki

Miyazu

Page 46: Satoyama woodland management

Kutuki

KeihokuKutuki

Miyazu

Page 47: Satoyama woodland management
Page 48: Satoyama woodland management

樹高(m)

幹数(本)

051015202530

051015202530

051015202530

051015202530

051015202530

051015202530

051015202530

051015202530

plot 1

5 10 15 20

plot 2

5 10 15 20

plot 3

5 10 15 20

アカマツ

アカマツ(枯)

ミズナラ

ミズナラ(枯)

コナラ

コナラ(枯)

ソヨゴ

Pinus densiflora

Pinus densiflora (dead)

Quercus crispula

Quercus crispula (dead)

Quercus serrata

Quercus serrata (dead)

Ilex pedunculosa

Other species

Height (m)

Num

ber o

f ste

ms

Page 49: Satoyama woodland management

樹高(m)

幹数(本)

024681012

024681012

024681012

024681012

plot 1

5 10 15 20

plot 2

5 10 15 20

plot 3

5 10 15 20

ミズナラ

ミズナラ(枯)

コナラ

コナラ(枯)

Quercus crispula

Quercus crispula (dead)

Quercus serrata

Quercus serrata (dead)

Height (m)

Num

ber o

f ste

ms

Page 50: Satoyama woodland management

Species in the gaps

Page 51: Satoyama woodland management

Magnolia salicifoliacanopy species

Page 52: Satoyama woodland management

Magnolia obovatacanopy species

Page 53: Satoyama woodland management

Ilex pedunculosasub-canopy species

Page 54: Satoyama woodland management

• Regenerating trees

• Dense sub-canopy and shrub layer may suppress regeneration of tree species.

Page 55: Satoyama woodland management

Keihoku

KeihokuKutuki

Miyazu

Page 56: Satoyama woodland management
Page 57: Satoyama woodland management
Page 58: Satoyama woodland management

樹高(m)

幹数(本)

0

50

100

150

0

50

100

150

0

50

100

150

0

50

100

150

0

50

100

150

0

50

100

150

0

50

100

150

5 10 15

ミズナラ

ミズナラ(枯)

コナラ

イヌブナ

ソヨゴ

コバノミツバツツジ

Quercus crispula

Quercus serrata

Ilex pedunculosa

Other species

Height (m)

Num

ber o

f ste

ms

Quercus crispula (dead)

Fagus japonica

Rhododendron reticulatum

Page 59: Satoyama woodland management

樹高(m)

幹数(本)

02468101214

02468101214

02468101214

5 10 15

ミズナラ

ミズナラ(枯)

コナラ

Height (m)

Num

ber o

f ste

ms

Quercus crispula

Quercus serrata

Quercus crispula (dead)

Page 60: Satoyama woodland management

Species in the gaps

Page 61: Satoyama woodland management

Fagus japonicacanopy species

Page 62: Satoyama woodland management

Rhododendron reticulatumshrub species

Page 63: Satoyama woodland management

Pieris japonicashrub species, deer unpalatable

Page 64: Satoyama woodland management

• Regenerating trees

• Fagus japonica

• Effects of deer?

• Unpalatable species (eg. Pieris japonica) in the shrub layer

Page 65: Satoyama woodland management

Miyazu

KeihokuKutuki

Miyazu

Page 66: Satoyama woodland management
Page 67: Satoyama woodland management
Page 68: Satoyama woodland management
Page 69: Satoyama woodland management
Page 70: Satoyama woodland management

胸高直径(cm)

幹数(本)

01020304050

01020304050

01020304050

01020304050

01020304050

01020304050

01020304050

plot 1

0 10 20 30 40 50

plot 2

0 10 20 30 40 50

plot 3

0 10 20 30 40 50

plot 4

0 10 20 30 40 50

ミズナラ

ミズナラ(枯)

リョウブ

オオカメノキ

ハイイヌガヤ

クロモジ

Quercus crispula

Clethra barbinervis

Cephalotaxus harringtonia var. nana

Other species

Diameter at breast height (cm)

Num

ber o

f ste

ms

Quercus crispula (dead)

Viburnum furcatum

Lindera umbellata

Page 71: Satoyama woodland management

胸高直径(cm)

幹数(本)

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

plot 1

0 10 20 30 40 50

plot 2

0 10 20 30 40 50

plot 3

0 10 20 30 40 50

plot 4

0 10 20 30 40 50

ミズナラ

ミズナラ(枯)

Quercus crispula

Diameter at breast height (cm)

Num

ber o

f ste

ms

Quercus crispula (dead)

Page 72: Satoyama woodland management

Species in the gaps

Page 73: Satoyama woodland management

Viburnum furcatumsub-canopy species

Page 74: Satoyama woodland management

Clethra barbinervissub-canopy species

Page 75: Satoyama woodland management

Cephalotaxus harringtonia var. nanasub-canopy species

Page 76: Satoyama woodland management

Dense Sasa undergrowthsuppresses seedling regeneration

Page 77: Satoyama woodland management

Cephalotaxus harringtonia

var. nanaThere were some seedlings

under Sasa.

Page 78: Satoyama woodland management

• Sasa covered most part of the forest floor.

• Few tree species regenerated in the gaps created by the mass mortality of oak trees.

Page 79: Satoyama woodland management

Under threat of deer

Page 80: Satoyama woodland management

Sika deerCervus nippon

Page 81: Satoyama woodland management

Deer browsingdamages sprouting (Quercus glauca)

Page 82: Satoyama woodland management

Deer-proof fencemore costs for wood production

Page 83: Satoyama woodland management

Summary

• Coppices under management can maintain rich floor plant species.

• Mass mortality of oak trees may change woodland composition.

• Deer may impact managed coppices.