Sasha Kuntsevich Nimrod Teneh Vladimir Pudalov Spin-droplet state of an interacting 2D electron...

download Sasha Kuntsevich Nimrod Teneh Vladimir Pudalov Spin-droplet state of an interacting 2D electron system M. Reznikov Magnetic order in clean low- density.

If you can't read please download the document

Transcript of Sasha Kuntsevich Nimrod Teneh Vladimir Pudalov Spin-droplet state of an interacting 2D electron...

  • Slide 1
  • Sasha Kuntsevich Nimrod Teneh Vladimir Pudalov Spin-droplet state of an interacting 2D electron system M. Reznikov Magnetic order in clean low- density systems Methods of magnetization measurements Recharging Technique Experimental results Implications Technion
  • Slide 2
  • Electron gas with interactions Short range repulsive interaction 2nd order phase transition into ferromagnetic ordered state For a single-valley system Stoner (1947) Stoner instability
  • Slide 3
  • Ferromagnetic Bloch Instability Decreasing density Energy
  • Slide 4
  • Phase diagram Attaccalite et al. (2001) First order transition at r s ~20: Senatore et al. (2001) r s ~26
  • Slide 5
  • Clean system B. Tanatar and D.C. Ceperley (1989) ferromagnetic
  • Slide 6
  • Clean system Very small energy difference! antiferromagnetic ferromagnetic B. Tanatar and D.C. Ceperley (1989)
  • Slide 7
  • Methods: Shubnikov - de Haas beatings F. Fang and P. Stiles (1968), T. Okamoto at al., (1999), S. Vitkalov at al. (2000), V. Pudalov at.al., (2001) 2 4 6 7 rsrs
  • Slide 8
  • V. Pudalov at al, (2001) Metal-Insulator Transition in a Silicon Inversion Layer gg
  • Slide 9
  • In-plane magnetoresistance S. Vitkalov et al. PRL 2001A. Shashkin et al. PLR, 2001
  • Slide 10
  • In-plane magnetoresistance A. Shashkin et al. PLR, 2001 Possible FM transition ??
  • Slide 11
  • Samples: Si Field effect transistors Russian samples, beginning of 80 th, Holland samples, mid 80 th Typical parameters 3.4 x10 4 cm 2 /Vs @1.7K
  • Slide 12
  • The Principle of the Recharging Technique Maxwell relation: Small correction
  • Slide 13
  • Diamagnetic contribution Capacitance contribution
  • Slide 14
  • Recharging Technique _ + VGVG Out Modulated magnetic field B+ Current Amplifier Ohmic contact Gate SiO 2 Si 2D electron gas
  • Slide 15
  • Expected behavior T=0, finite magnetic field gg Interactions M n No interactions n Interactions Prus et al,2003 B>T
  • Slide 16
  • B (T) g B B~2E F kT/4
  • Slide 17
  • Raw data, low fields Compare with single spins M/n= B tanh(b), b=g B B/2T
  • Slide 18
  • 1
  • Slide 19
  • Slide 20
  • The same characteristic magnetic field
  • Slide 21
  • Interactions n n No interactions Interactions d /dn(n), expectations
  • Slide 22
  • d /dn(n), T=1.7-13K
  • Slide 23
  • d /dn(n), T=0.6-4K
  • Slide 24
  • vs. Temperature
  • Slide 25
  • Slide 26
  • Slide 27
  • (n), T=1.7-13K
  • Slide 28
  • Magnetic moment at B=2T
  • Slide 29
  • Comparison with Transport Measurements
  • Slide 30
  • Main observations Possible scenario: few electron droplets
  • Slide 31
  • Droplet scenario vs theory Fermi-liquid expectations: Spontaneous large spin droplets in disordered metal Diffusion enhanced interactions in quantum dots Mean Field treatment: Andreev, Kamenev (1998) Numerics: Shepelyansky (2001) Narozhny, B. N. and Aleiner, I. L. and Larkin, A. I. (2000)
  • Slide 32
  • Conclusion: Problems :
  • Slide 33
  • Problem O. Prus, Y. Yaish, M. Reznikov, U. Sivan, and V. Pudalov, PRB 2003 : Assumption: at large density the susceptibility is the renormalized Pauli one This assumption happened to be wrong!
  • Slide 34
  • Old results (Prus et al, 2003)
  • Slide 35
  • Field dependence of the magnetic moment
  • Slide 36
  • In-plane magnetoresistance A. Shashkin et al. PLR, 2001Fleury, Weintal, 2010.
  • Slide 37
  • Raw data
  • Slide 38
  • Susceptibility in at B=2T
  • Slide 39
  • d /dn(n), Holland sample
  • Slide 40
  • Stoner Ferromagnetic Instability Stoner (1947) Finkelstein (1983) For a short range repulsive interaction Diffusion enhanced interactions in quantum dots Mean Field treatment: Andreev, Kamenev (1998) Numerics: Shepelyansky (2001)
  • Slide 41
  • Clean system Very small energy difference! antiferromagnetic ferromagnetic A. Finkelstein (1983), Castellani at al.,(1984) Shekhter, A. and Finkel'stein, A. M (2005) B. Tanatar and D.C. Ceperley (1989)
  • Slide 42
  • Real system S=0 Bhatt and Lee (1982)
  • Slide 43
  • Real system S=0 Bhatt and Lee (1982)
  • Slide 44
  • Real system S=0 Bhatt and Lee (1982) Andreev, A. V. & Kamenev, A. (1998) Kurland, I. L. and Aleiner, I. L. and Altshuler, B. L. (2000)
  • Slide 45