SARNATH-PROFILE-CAE
Transcript of SARNATH-PROFILE-CAE
SARNATH
CORPORATE PROFILE
CAE
CLIENTS WORKED WITH
PARAMETRIC TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION (FORTUNE 500)
M/s. ASHOK LEYLAND LTD.,
M/s. TITAN INDUSTRIES.,
M/s.UCAL SYSTEMS (MINICA SERVICES).
M/s. HYUNDAI ENGG. CO. LTD.,
M/s. DURR INDIA LTD.,
M/s. RANE STEERING SYSTEMS.,
M/s. ABAN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY.,
M/s. F.F.E MINERALS.,
M/s. THAR TECHNOLOGIES.,
M/s. JAPS TECH ENGINEERS PVT. LTD.,
M/s. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF OCEAN TECHNOLOGY.
M/s. I.I.T. CHENNAI.,
M/s. GULF ENGINEERING INDUSTRIES.,
DOMAIN EXPERTISE
1. Customization/Design Process Automation
2. FEA, CFD & MBD
3. Stacker Reclaimer Design
4. Ship Unloader Design
5. Wind Turbine (Structures Design and Value Engineering)
6. Lean & Kaizen
7. Product Development
8. Reverse Engineering
Sub Domain Expertise
Crash Analysis.
CFD Analysis.
Fatigue Life Estimation.
Multi Body Contact Analysis.
Vibration Analysis of Motor/Engine, Automotive and Aerospace component.
Spring Back Simulation during forming operations.
Non Linear - Transient - Casting Solidification Simulation.
Coupled Field (Fluid-Structure Interaction, Thermal–Struct., CFD-THERMAL).
Non Linear Explicit Dynamic and Transient Problems
CAE PROJECTS
Project Description Client Type Team
Size
Man
Days
FEA & CFD of Water Pump UCAL (Minica Services) FEA & CFD 2 100
CO2 pump Analysis Thar Technologies Structural FEA 2 120
Pipe Seal Analysis ChangePond
Non Linear
Rubber 1 50
Door Seal Analysis Five Element
Non Linear
Rubber 1 80
CFD Analysis of Helical Port ASHOKLEYLAND CFD 2 120
CHASSIS REDESIGN ASHOKLEYLAND FEA 3 180
CFD Analysis of CAR Body Borgwarner CFD 1 40
Hitch Optimization TAFE
FEA +
Optimization 1 30
STEERING PUMP SHAFT ANALYSIS RANE STEERING SYSTEMS FEA 2 80
EVALUATION OF DESIGN FOR 300
LITER EXTRACTION VESSEL Thar Technologies FEA 1 20
BOGIE BOLSTER ICF FEA 1 50
THROTTLE BRACKET UCAL FUEL SYSTEMS Vibration FEA 1 15
Vibration Analysis of ETC MOTOR VESTEON Vibration FEA 1 20
Hot Coke Car Frame Analysis FLSMIDTH Structural FEA 2 40
Skid Analysis DURR Structural FEA 1 30
AC Duct Design Borgwarner CFD 2 60
CFD PROJECTS
PROPERTIES OF FLUID
Density = 998.2 kg/m^3
Kinematic Viscosity = 0.62 m^2/s
Thermal Conductivity (W/m-K) = 0.6x10^-3
Specific Heat (J/kg K) = 4182
Average velocity = 13.8 m/s
Discharge = 0.12 m^3/s
CFD VOLUME
IMPELLER BLADE
MESHED MODEL
MID VOLUME
VELOCITY DISTRIBUTION
PRESSURE DISTRIBUTION
GRAPH
VELOCITY DISTRIBUTION AT
OUTLET SECTION
ASSEMBLY CUT SECTION
GAP REDUCTION MODEL
VELOCITY DISTRIBUTION
PRESSURE DISTRIBUTION
GRAPH
VELOCITY DISTRIBUTION
PRESSURE DISTRIBUTION
GRAPH
VELOCITY DISTRIBUTION AT
OUTLET SECTION
RESULTS
REVISION 3
AVG OUTLET VELOCITY 1.2M/S
REDUCED GAP
AVG OUTLET VELOCITY 1.4M/S
REDUCED BLADE ANGLE
AVG OUTLET VELOCITY 1.7M/S
HEAD - SIX CYLINDER
M/s. ASHOK LEYLAND LTD.
(ENNORE)
GLOCON SERVEN
FLOW ANALYSIS OF 20”
Trim Valve CFD Analysis
Pump Model
Extracted Fluid Domain
Given Conditions
•Fluid – Water
•Sp. Gravity – 1
•Inlet pressure – 4 Bar
•Differential Pressure – 1 Bar
•Temperature – Ambient
Sectional View
In Out
Inlet Boundary Condition
Pressure – 4 Bar
Turbulence Intensity – 5%
Outlet Boundary Condition
Pressure – 3 Bar
Wall Boundary Condition
Wall Influence On Flow – No
Slip
Wall Roughness – Smooth Wall
Domain Fluid – Water
Turbulance Model – K-E
Model
Repaired Surfaces
Meshed Domain Model
•No. of Nodes = 681484
•No. of Elements = 3079508
•Element Shape Used is
Tetrahedral
Solution Details
26 iterations
Time Taken for these Iteration is 2 Days
6 Hrs 30 Minutes
Streamline Flow (Isometric View)
In
Out
Streamline Flow (Front View)
In Out
Streamline Flow (Top View)
In
Out
Velocity Contour (Mid Plane)
In Out
Velocity Contour at Trim (Mid Plane)
Velocity Vector
In Out
Outlet Dia Vs Velocity
Mean Velocity = 2.506 m/s
Outlet Area = 0.166106 m2
Discharge = 1498.74 m3/hr
Calculations
Specific Gravity of Water (SG) = 1
Pressure Gradient (p1-p2) = 1 bar
Discharge (F) = 1498.74
m3/hr
Flow Factor (Kv) =
F*sqrt(SG/(p1-p2))
= 1498.739159
Flow Coefficient (Cv) = 1.16 Kv
= 1738.537
Total Pressure Contour
In Out
Total Pressure Contour at Trim
Result
Average Outlet Velocity After 26 Iteration –
2.5 m/s
Flow Coefficient After 26 Iteration -
1738.537
Note: Average Outlet Velocity After 6 Iteration - 2.786 m/s
Flow Coefficient After 6 Iteration - 1932.662
CAR BODY
BORG WARNER
AC DUCT DESIGN
BORG WARNER
1
X
Y
Z
0
.222848.445696
.668544.891392
1.1141.337
1.561.783
2.006
FEB 16 2005
10:50:08
VECTOR
STEP=7
SUB =1
V
NODE=350
MIN=0
MAX=2.006
1
X
Y
Z
0
.24761.49522
.74283.99044
1.2381.486
1.7331.981
2.228
FEB 16 2005
11:13:22
VECTOR
STEP=4
SUB =1
V
NODE=527
MIN=0
MAX=2.228
FEA
Radiation
Non-Linear Materials (Rubber, Composites)
Explicit Dynamics (Crash, Forming, Wrinkling)
Spring Back
Contact
Coupled Field (Fluid-Structure interaction
Thermal-Structural)
Vibration
Transient Radiation
Analysis AES USA
Volume of the Filament = 1.2e-005 m³ Total Heat Generated = 4.4 KW Heat Generated = Total Heat Generated / Filament Volume
= 3.67e8 W/m3
Heat Generation Calculation
Loading Conditions
Heat Generated on Carbon Filament - 3.67e8 W/m3
Emissivity of surfaces
Stefan Boltzmann Constant - 5.67e-8
Space Temperature - 22 Deg C
Material Emissivity values
Gold reflector 0.03
Carbon IR emitters 1.0
Aluminum chamber (Side Surface) 0.20
Aluminum chamber (Top & Bottom) 0.10
Steel supports 0.2
Transparent quartz glass 0.8
Transparent glass substrate 0.8
End Connector
Quartz Tube
Carbon Filament
Quartz Bulb
Temperature Contour near the End Connector (Sectional View)
Temperature Contour Showing Glass Substrate at 100 Secs
Temperature Contour Showing Glass Substrate at 100 Secs
Symmetry Side
Symmetry Side
Temperature Contour (Half Section) 100 Sec
Temperature Contour Showing Glass Substrate at 105 Secs
Temperature Contour Showing Glass Substrate at 105 Secs
Symmetry Side
Symmetry Side
Temperature Contour (Half Section) 105 Sec
Temperature Contour Showing Glass Substrate at 110 Secs
Temperature Contour Showing Glass Substrate at 110 Secs
Symmetry Side
Symmetry Side
Temperature Contour (Half Section) 110 Sec
Temperature Contour Showing Glass Substrate at 200 Secs
Temperature Contour 200 Sec
Steps Time [s]
[A] Outer
Corner
[°C]
[B]
Corner
on Z
Direction
[°C]
[C]
Center of
Full
Glass
Plate
[°C]
[D]
Corner
on X
Direction
[°C]
1
0. 22. 22. 22. 22.
15.385 22.281 22.322 22.259 22.244
25.385 23.631 23.855 23.493 23.419
35.385 28.27 29.108 27.724 27.437
45.385 35.242 36.936 33.939 33.298
57.549 49.474 52.835 46.553 45.01
69.472 72.531 78.451 66.948 63.582
80.46 101.69 110.68 92.77 86.851
91.447 136.15 148.49 123.24 114.28
124.02 306.02 326.86 271.68 248.7
149.54 488.91 509.52 430.42 396.58
169.23 636.02 651.53 560.56 522.37
188.93 755.43 762.85 669.48 634.79
200. 813.14 815.56 723.08 692.71
Model > Glass Temperature
Temperature Change in Glass Plate
A B
C D
Time
100 S 102.5 S 105 S 107.5 S 110 S
1 160.01 171.17 182.33 193.5 204.66
2 167.53 179.09 190.64 202.19 213.74
3 170.14 182.33 194.25 206.17 218.09
4 174.89 186.84 198.79 210.73 222.68
5 176.35 188.58 200.81 213.04 225.27
6 184.95 197.63 210.3 222.98 235.66
7 185.46 198.2 210.93 223.66 236.39
8 190.49 203.54 216.59 229.64 242.69
9 180.65 192.92 203.18 217.44 229.7
Location Vs Temperature
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Location
Tem
pera
ture
(D
eg
C)
100 S
102.5 S
105 S
107.5 S
110 S
Temperature Change Middle X-Axis
Hyper Elastic Problems
SEAL ANALYSIS
CHANGEPOND
FLORA ELASTOMER
Result for rubber seal
compression Displacement
max(radial)
Stress max
0.2mm 0.2545mm 0.3051 N/mm2
Result for steel rubber seal
compression Displacement
max(radial)
Stress max
0.2mm 0.1143mm 2.682 N/mm2
Door Seal Analysis
CRASH
CO2 PUMP
THAR TECHNOLOGIES
MESHED MODEL
PUMP-APPLIED PRESSURE
AREA
STRESS DISTRIBUTION IN THE
PUMP AT 14000 PSI
FILLET GEOMETRY
PRESSURE AREA IN THE PUMP
WITH FILLETS
STRESS DISTRIBUTION IN RE-
DESIGNED PUMP
MANIFOLD MESHED MODEL
MANIFOLD-AREAS SUBJECTED
TO PRESSURE
STRESS DISTRIBUTION AT
12,000 PSI
STRESS DISTRIBUTION AT
14,000 PSI
DEFORMATION
(EXAGIRATED)
HITCH OPTIMIZATION
Testforce (N) 5700 Dynamic
Testforce sideways (N) 4479.25 Static
Testforce vertical (N) 7072.25 Static, downwards
LOADING CONDITIONS
SHAPE CONDITION
WEIGH
T
(Kg)
STRES
S
(MPA)
DEFLECTION
(mm)
PIPE SECTION INITIAL 0.543 25.3 0.025
OPTIMIZED 0.426 51.3 0.038
RECTANGULAR INITIAL 0.594 36.9 0.018
OPTIMIZED 0.481 49.5 0.028
I SECTION INITIAL 0.527 20.1 0.021
OPTIMIZED 0.385 51.8 0.034
RESULT REVIEW
HOT COKE CAR
FRAME ANALYSIS
FFE MINERALS
Deflection- overall
RESULTS
MAXIMUM DEFLECTION IN
THE FRAME IS ON = 5.255 mm
THE BASE CROSS MEMBERS
MAIN MEMBER DEFLECTION = 2.628-3.28 mm
STRESS INDUCED IN = 50-75 N/mm2
THE MAIN BEAM IS
STRESS INDUCED = 110-150 N/mm2
IN THE CROSS BRASS
MAXIMUM STRESS INDUCED = 573.484 N/mm2
SKID ANALYSIS
DURR INDIA
ETC MOTOR
VESTEON
DENTAL PROJECTS
FEA FOR BIOMEDICAL
ENGINEERING STRESS ANALYSIS OF
EYE BALLS
BONES
TEETH
LOAD BEARING CAPACITY OF IMPLANT AND PROSTHETIC SYSTEMS
MECHANICS OF HEART VALVES.
IMPACT ANALYSIS OF SKULL
DYNAMICS OF ANATOMICAL STRUCTURES.
MANDIBLE BONE GENERATION
Dr.RAMESH
RAGAS DENTAL COLLEGE
CAST PARTIAL
DENTURE
Dr.HARI
SAVEETHA DENTAL COLLEGE
Dr.RAJKIRAN
SAVEETHA DENTAL COLLEGE
CAP SUPPORT ON 2ND
MOLAR AND CANINE AND
CENTRAL INSISOR
CAP SUPPORT ON 2ND
MOLAR AND CANINE WITH
50% BONE LOSS
CENTRAL INCISOR Dr.RAISON
SAVEETHA DENTAL COLLEGE
Dr.RAISON
SAVEETHA DENTAL COLLEGE
DISTRACTION OF
MAXILA BONE
Dr.NAREN
SRI RAMACHANDRA MEDICAL COLLEGE
Comparison of Straight
and Inclined Abutment on
a 4 implant Mandible
Dr.Anshu
SRI RAMACHANDRA MEDICAL COLLEGE
Analysis of Central Insisor
with and without Ferrule
Dr.Arthi
Titanium without Ferrule
Comparison Between
Screw and plate
connection on a mandible
Dr.Romita
Bridge
Dr.Lin
Bridge Implant
Dr.Lambodaran
Cantilever Bridge Implant
Dr.Abijitha
Two Piece Implant
Dr.Karthikeyen
Max torque for Material
removal with Protaper
Files
Dr.Sihivahanan
Effective en-masse
retraction design with
orthodontic mini-implant
anchorage Dr.Ashok
Mandible over denture
Dr.Ramakrishna
en-masse retraction
design with varying loop
design
Dr.Raghu
Maxila with Denture
supported on 4 implants
Dr.Imran
THANK YOU