S1100 The Utility of Transcatheter Angiography and Embolisation in the Management of Refractory...

1
lesion, Forrest classification, endoscopic treatment, transfusion, urgent surgery, hospitaliza- tion or outpatient, hemorrhagic recidive and Rockall score). Our outcomes were mortality directly related to the hemorrhage (in-hospital), mortality up 30 days and length of stay in hospitalized patients. For statistical analysis we used the Chi-square test and t Student test, with p<0.05 as significant differences. Results: 832 patients (532 male, 300 female), with median age 69 years; admission in weekdays 610 patients (73.1%) and weekend/holydays 222 patients (26.6%). The groups A and B are similar (Table) Mortality in-hospital 24 patients (2.88%)(6 patients admitted weekend/holidays vs 18 patients in weekdays, p=1), and total mortality 41 patients (4.92%) (9 patients admitted in weekend/holydays vs 32 patients in weekdays, p=0.588); length stay of hospitalized patients 5.4 ± 4.7 days (5.4 ± 4.4 in group A vs 5.5 ± 5.9 in group B, p=0.873). Conclusions: In our hospital does not exist weekend effect on patients with NVUGIH S1098 Suboptimal Utilization of Antiplatelet Therapy in the Setting of Treated Peptic Ulcer Disease Bleeding Post Coronary Artery Stenting Freddy Caldera, Debabrata Mukherjee, Tracy E. Macaulay, Maria S. Melguizo, Lisbeth A. Selby According to the American Heart Association 16.8 million Americans carried the diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD) in 2006. Percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary stenting have changed the management of CAD. The use of coronary artery stents has increased the need for dual anti-platelet therapy, generally aspirin and clopidogrel. Protective cardiovascular effects are balanced with increased bleeding including risk of overt gastrointes- tinal bleeding; within 30 days the risk is 1.3% with overall risk of 3%. Further complicating decision making is that early discontinuation of dual anti-platelet therapy in this setting may lead to stent thrombosis in 29% of patients with an 80% mortality. The aim of the study was to characterize physician management of anti-platelet therapy post coronary artery stent placement in patients who develop gastrointestinal bleeding. We developed an anonymous survey of internal medicine and family medicine residents and physicians. The survey contained demographic items and 12 questions, about a variety of GI topics in addition to the index study question. All US internal and family medicine program directors were invited to encourage their residents and faculty to participate. A 55 year old with DM, HTN and coronary artery disease had a drug eluting stent placed 3 months ago. For stent patency the patient is on ASA 81mg and clopidogrel 75mg daily. He presents to ER with an upper GI bleed; on endoscopy he is found to have a bleeding gastric ulcer that is treated appropriately. Four days after admission he is ready for discharge. What would you do with his anticoagulation? Acceptable answers were: 1) Consult cardiology, or 2) continue ASA & clopidogrel. Incorrect answers were stopping one or both agents. 581 surveys were completed by attending physicians (39%) and residents (61%). Forty-two percent were family practice physicians and 56% were internal medicine physicians responding. 75% responders practice in an academic setting. When presented with the case patient, only 38.1% of the subjects chose to continue aspirin and clopidogrel therapy. Our survey suggests that primary care physicians do not appropriately manage dual anti-platelet therapy in patients with peptic ulder bleeding after recent PCI. Once the source of bleeding has been definitively treated, early re-introduction of dual anti-platelet therapy is indicated to prevent the devastating complication of stent thrombosis. As gastroenterologists we should take a stronger role in educating primary care providers about the relative safety of anti-platelet agents in the setting of treated peptic ulcer bleeding. S1099 Risk Factors for Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Patients With Drug Eluting Stents Placement: A Pilot Case Control Study in Japanese Multicenter. Kazuhide Higuchi, Eiji Umegaki, Akihito Nagahara, Mototsugu Kato, Keisuke Kimura, Tomoyuki Ota, Shin'ichi Takahashi, Shojiro Yamamoto, Akiko Shiotani, Toshio Watanabe, Tetsuo Arakawa, Hideyuki Hiraishi, Kazunari Kanke, Seiji Hokimoto, Kazuma Fujimoto, Hisao Ogawa Widespread use of drug eluting stents (DES) has led to dramatic improvement in acute coronary syndrome. After stenting, it is usually required to receive the dual anticoagulant therapy as low-dose aspirin (L-ASP) and thienopyridine (ticlopidine: TIC, clopidogrel: CLO), leading to prevent gastrointestinal bleeding. This multicenter case control study in Japan was to compare background factors for patients with gastrointestinal bleeding (cases) and non-bleeding patients (controls) after DES. Methods; We enrolled 22 gastrointestinal bleed- ing cases with endoscopy, and no bleeding patients with DES as controls at the same time S-179 AGA Abstracts as the bleeding cases from 2006 to present. Results; As indicated in table, age (75.5±11.4 vs 65.9±8.4, P<0.01) and ulcer history (27.3% vs 6.0%, P = 0.02) were significant risk factors for bleeding of the patients with DES. The bleeding odds were 1.1 for age (1.0 - 1.2, P = 0.001), and 5.9 (1.3 - 26.3, P = 0.02) for ulcer history. Ulcer characteristics of 22 bleeding ulcers were as follow; bleeding sites: stomach 14, duodenum 7, small intestine 1; Forrest I/II/III: 7/10/4; single ulcer/multiple ulcer: 6/22; period from stent placement until bleeding: 222.5 ± 263.1 days (1 - 903 days). Bleeding gastric ulcers were more common in males than duodenal ulcers (92.9% vs 57.1%, P = 0.0309). BMI was higher (24.9±3.7 vs 19.1±1.2, P = 0.0017), and the period until bleeding occurred was shorter (125.6±133.8 vs 328.7±302.1 days, P = 0.0433) in gastric ulcers. Concomitant use of PPI and H2 receptor antagonists (H2RA) was limited in the patients with DES in Japan as indicated in table, and the use was more common in acute myocardial infarction (72.75 vs 28.6%, P = 0.03). The ratio in the concomitant use of PPI and H2RA was the same in bleeding and control groups. Conclusion; Advanced age and past ulcer history were major risk factors for gastrointestinal bleeding following DES placement. PPI and H2RA were prescribed for high risk patients, but the prophylactic effect of these agents was not demonstrated in this study, which warrants a further prospective study to evaluate their effect on bleeding suppression after DES placement. S1100 The Utility of Transcatheter Angiography and Embolisation in the Management of Refractory Peptic Ulcer Haemorrhage Javaid Iqbal, Usman Aujla, Alistair Craig, Yogananda Reddy, Alistair Makin, Nicholas Chalmers, Gerard Murphy, Finn Farquharson, Stephen Butterfield, Raymond Ashleigh, Jayapal Ramesh, Belkys B. Husein, Timothy Cooksley INTRODUCTION: The majority of patients with upper GI haemorrhage are managed success- fully by resuscitation, endoscopic therapy and intravenous proton pump inhibitors (IV PPI). Rebleeding can occur in up to 25% of patients; who are then retreated with endotherapy or referred for surgery. This group of patients has a high mortality and surgery is associated with high morbidity. The role of minimally invasive angiography in this cohort of refractory bleeding ulcers has not been studied in the post IV PPI therapy era AIMS & METHODS: We evaluated the use of embolisation in the management of uncontrolled peptic ulcer related GI bleeding. Data from patients who underwent angiography at two teaching hospitals between March 02-March 08 for ongoing peptic ulcer haemorrhage was retrospectively reviewed. 24 patients were on IV omeprazole (40mg) prior to endoscopy, except 1 patient who received oral lansoprazole (30mg) and all were treated with continuous infusion of IV omeprazole following index endoscopy RESULTS: 42 patients underwent angiography for upper GI bleeding of which 25 had peptic ulcer bleeding with a mean age of 70 (34-92) years; 18 (72%) patients being male. Median pre and post endoscopy Rockall scores were 5 (range 3-7) and 7 (range 4-9) respectively. Diagnosis was duodenal ulcer 19 (76%), gastric ulcer 4 (16%) and gastroduodenal ulcer in 2 (8%) cases. Endoscopic therapy was given in 16 (64%) cases. This was dual or triple therapy in 11 (69%) and single modality therapy (adrenaline injection) in 5 (31%). Second look endoscopy was performed in 16 (72%) patients of whom 4 (25%) had further endoscopic therapy. Angiography was attempted in all and coil embolisation was performed in 23 (92%) patients where a bleeding point was identified. In the remaining 2 (8%) there was no identifiable source of bleeding, and embolisation was not performed. 6 patients had a 2nd angiogram; 1 resulted in therapy in a previously untreated patient. 1 patient had surgery for ongoing bleeding. There were 6 (24%) deaths at a mean time of 21 days (range 4-36) from admission. This was due to uncontrolled bleeding in 3 cases (12%) and pneumonia in the remainder. This gives a technical success of 100% with an initial clinical success of 72%, and eventual success rate after repeat angiogram was 84% CONCLUSION: Transcatheter angiography and embolisation plays a significant role in the management of peptic ulcer bleeding when endoscopic therapy and IV PPI fail. This maybe considered as an alternative to surgery, however further studies are needed to substantiate this claim S1101 Non Variceal Upper Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage (NVUGIH): Epidemiological Changes in Two Periods of Time (1994-1997 and 2005-2008) Pedro Almela, Marta Bañuls, Rosario Anton, Pilar Mas, Vicente Sanchiz, Isabel Pascual, Miguel Minguez, Adolfo Benages Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical, therapeutic, and outcome changes in NVUGIH patients in two periods of time. Patients and Methods: Prospective study on patients with NVUGIH covering two time periods (cohort A: 1.1.1994 to 30.9.1997 and cohort B: 1.1.2005 to 31.12.2008). All the patients were attended in the emergency department of a university hospital in Valencia (Spain). The cohort A includes 968 patients and the cohort B 832 patients. We have analyzed the differences between both cohorts respect to demographic data, clinical and endoscopic characteristics, and outcome. For qualitative parameters we used the chi-square and the t Student for quantitative parameters, AGA Abstracts

Transcript of S1100 The Utility of Transcatheter Angiography and Embolisation in the Management of Refractory...

Page 1: S1100 The Utility of Transcatheter Angiography and Embolisation in the Management of Refractory Peptic Ulcer Haemorrhage

lesion, Forrest classification, endoscopic treatment, transfusion, urgent surgery, hospitaliza-tion or outpatient, hemorrhagic recidive and Rockall score). Our outcomes were mortalitydirectly related to the hemorrhage (in-hospital), mortality up 30 days and length of stay inhospitalized patients. For statistical analysis we used the Chi-square test and t Student test,with p<0.05 as significant differences. Results: 832 patients (532 male, 300 female), withmedian age 69 years; admission in weekdays 610 patients (73.1%) and weekend/holydays222 patients (26.6%). The groups A and B are similar (Table) Mortality in-hospital 24patients (2.88%)(6 patients admitted weekend/holidays vs 18 patients in weekdays, p=1),and total mortality 41 patients (4.92%) (9 patients admitted in weekend/holydays vs 32patients in weekdays, p=0.588); length stay of hospitalized patients 5.4 ± 4.7 days (5.4 ±4.4 in group A vs 5.5 ± 5.9 in group B, p=0.873). Conclusions: In our hospital does notexist weekend effect on patients with NVUGIH

S1098

Suboptimal Utilization of Antiplatelet Therapy in the Setting of Treated PepticUlcer Disease Bleeding Post Coronary Artery StentingFreddy Caldera, Debabrata Mukherjee, Tracy E. Macaulay, Maria S. Melguizo, Lisbeth A.Selby

According to the American Heart Association 16.8 million Americans carried the diagnosisof coronary artery disease (CAD) in 2006. Percutaneous coronary intervention and coronarystenting have changed the management of CAD. The use of coronary artery stents hasincreased the need for dual anti-platelet therapy, generally aspirin and clopidogrel. Protectivecardiovascular effects are balanced with increased bleeding including risk of overt gastrointes-tinal bleeding; within 30 days the risk is 1.3% with overall risk of 3%. Further complicatingdecision making is that early discontinuation of dual anti-platelet therapy in this settingmay lead to stent thrombosis in 29% of patients with an 80% mortality. The aim of thestudy was to characterize physician management of anti-platelet therapy post coronaryartery stent placement in patients who develop gastrointestinal bleeding. We developed ananonymous survey of internal medicine and family medicine residents and physicians. Thesurvey contained demographic items and 12 questions, about a variety of GI topics inaddition to the index study question. All US internal and family medicine program directorswere invited to encourage their residents and faculty to participate. A 55 year old with DM,HTN and coronary artery disease had a drug eluting stent placed 3 months ago. For stentpatency the patient is on ASA 81mg and clopidogrel 75mg daily. He presents to ER withan upper GI bleed; on endoscopy he is found to have a bleeding gastric ulcer that is treatedappropriately. Four days after admission he is ready for discharge. What would you do withhis anticoagulation? Acceptable answers were: 1) Consult cardiology, or 2) continue ASA& clopidogrel. Incorrect answers were stopping one or both agents. 581 surveys werecompleted by attending physicians (39%) and residents (61%). Forty-two percent werefamily practice physicians and 56% were internal medicine physicians responding. 75%responders practice in an academic setting. When presented with the case patient, only38.1% of the subjects chose to continue aspirin and clopidogrel therapy. Our survey suggeststhat primary care physicians do not appropriately manage dual anti-platelet therapy inpatients with peptic ulder bleeding after recent PCI. Once the source of bleeding has beendefinitively treated, early re-introduction of dual anti-platelet therapy is indicated to preventthe devastating complication of stent thrombosis. As gastroenterologists we should take astronger role in educating primary care providers about the relative safety of anti-plateletagents in the setting of treated peptic ulcer bleeding.

S1099

Risk Factors for Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Patients With Drug ElutingStents Placement: A Pilot Case Control Study in Japanese Multicenter.Kazuhide Higuchi, Eiji Umegaki, Akihito Nagahara, Mototsugu Kato, Keisuke Kimura,Tomoyuki Ota, Shin'ichi Takahashi, Shojiro Yamamoto, Akiko Shiotani, Toshio Watanabe,Tetsuo Arakawa, Hideyuki Hiraishi, Kazunari Kanke, Seiji Hokimoto, Kazuma Fujimoto,Hisao Ogawa

Widespread use of drug eluting stents (DES) has led to dramatic improvement in acutecoronary syndrome. After stenting, it is usually required to receive the dual anticoagulanttherapy as low-dose aspirin (L-ASP) and thienopyridine (ticlopidine: TIC, clopidogrel: CLO),leading to prevent gastrointestinal bleeding. This multicenter case control study in Japanwas to compare background factors for patients with gastrointestinal bleeding (cases) andnon-bleeding patients (controls) after DES. Methods; We enrolled 22 gastrointestinal bleed-ing cases with endoscopy, and no bleeding patients with DES as controls at the same time

S-179 AGA Abstracts

as the bleeding cases from 2006 to present. Results; As indicated in table, age (75.5±11.4vs 65.9±8.4, P<0.01) and ulcer history (27.3% vs 6.0%, P = 0.02) were significant riskfactors for bleeding of the patients with DES. The bleeding odds were 1.1 for age (1.0 -1.2, P = 0.001), and 5.9 (1.3 - 26.3, P = 0.02) for ulcer history. Ulcer characteristics of 22bleeding ulcers were as follow; bleeding sites: stomach 14, duodenum 7, small intestine 1;Forrest I/II/III: 7/10/4; single ulcer/multiple ulcer: 6/22; period from stent placement untilbleeding: 222.5 ± 263.1 days (1 - 903 days). Bleeding gastric ulcers were more commonin males than duodenal ulcers (92.9% vs 57.1%, P = 0.0309). BMI was higher (24.9±3.7vs 19.1±1.2, P = 0.0017), and the period until bleeding occurred was shorter (125.6±133.8vs 328.7±302.1 days, P = 0.0433) in gastric ulcers. Concomitant use of PPI and H2 receptorantagonists (H2RA) was limited in the patients with DES in Japan as indicated in table, andthe use was more common in acute myocardial infarction (72.75 vs 28.6%, P = 0.03). Theratio in the concomitant use of PPI and H2RA was the same in bleeding and control groups.Conclusion; Advanced age and past ulcer history were major risk factors for gastrointestinalbleeding following DES placement. PPI and H2RA were prescribed for high risk patients,but the prophylactic effect of these agents was not demonstrated in this study, whichwarrants a further prospective study to evaluate their effect on bleeding suppression afterDES placement.

S1100

The Utility of Transcatheter Angiography and Embolisation in theManagement of Refractory Peptic Ulcer HaemorrhageJavaid Iqbal, Usman Aujla, Alistair Craig, Yogananda Reddy, Alistair Makin, NicholasChalmers, Gerard Murphy, Finn Farquharson, Stephen Butterfield, Raymond Ashleigh,Jayapal Ramesh, Belkys B. Husein, Timothy Cooksley

INTRODUCTION: Themajority of patients with upper GI haemorrhage are managed success-fully by resuscitation, endoscopic therapy and intravenous proton pump inhibitors (IV PPI).Rebleeding can occur in up to 25% of patients; who are then retreated with endotherapyor referred for surgery. This group of patients has a high mortality and surgery is associatedwith high morbidity. The role of minimally invasive angiography in this cohort of refractorybleeding ulcers has not been studied in the post IV PPI therapy era AIMS & METHODS:We evaluated the use of embolisation in the management of uncontrolled peptic ulcer relatedGI bleeding. Data from patients who underwent angiography at two teaching hospitalsbetween March 02-March 08 for ongoing peptic ulcer haemorrhage was retrospectivelyreviewed. 24 patients were on IV omeprazole (40mg) prior to endoscopy, except 1 patientwho received oral lansoprazole (30mg) and all were treated with continuous infusion of IVomeprazole following index endoscopy RESULTS: 42 patients underwent angiography forupper GI bleeding of which 25 had peptic ulcer bleeding with a mean age of 70 (34-92)years; 18 (72%) patients being male. Median pre and post endoscopy Rockall scores were5 (range 3-7) and 7 (range 4-9) respectively. Diagnosis was duodenal ulcer 19 (76%), gastriculcer 4 (16%) and gastroduodenal ulcer in 2 (8%) cases. Endoscopic therapy was given in16 (64%) cases. This was dual or triple therapy in 11 (69%) and single modality therapy(adrenaline injection) in 5 (31%). Second look endoscopy was performed in 16 (72%)patients of whom 4 (25%) had further endoscopic therapy. Angiography was attempted inall and coil embolisation was performed in 23 (92%) patients where a bleeding point wasidentified. In the remaining 2 (8%) there was no identifiable source of bleeding, andembolisation was not performed. 6 patients had a 2nd angiogram; 1 resulted in therapy ina previously untreated patient. 1 patient had surgery for ongoing bleeding. There were 6(24%) deaths at a mean time of 21 days (range 4-36) from admission. This was due touncontrolled bleeding in 3 cases (12%) and pneumonia in the remainder. This gives atechnical success of 100% with an initial clinical success of 72%, and eventual success rateafter repeat angiogramwas 84%CONCLUSION: Transcatheter angiography and embolisationplays a significant role in the management of peptic ulcer bleeding when endoscopic therapyand IV PPI fail. This maybe considered as an alternative to surgery, however further studiesare needed to substantiate this claim

S1101

Non Variceal Upper Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage (NVUGIH): EpidemiologicalChanges in Two Periods of Time (1994-1997 and 2005-2008)Pedro Almela, Marta Bañuls, Rosario Anton, Pilar Mas, Vicente Sanchiz, Isabel Pascual,Miguel Minguez, Adolfo Benages

Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical, therapeutic, and outcomechanges in NVUGIH patients in two periods of time. Patients and Methods: Prospectivestudy on patients with NVUGIH covering two time periods (cohort A: 1.1.1994 to 30.9.1997and cohort B: 1.1.2005 to 31.12.2008). All the patients were attended in the emergencydepartment of a university hospital in Valencia (Spain). The cohort A includes 968 patientsand the cohort B 832 patients. We have analyzed the differences between both cohortsrespect to demographic data, clinical and endoscopic characteristics, and outcome. Forqualitative parameters we used the chi-square and the t Student for quantitative parameters,

AG

AA

bst

ract

s