S TREAM D EVELOPMENT AND L ONGITUDINAL S TREAM P ROFILES.
-
Upload
janessa-doyle -
Category
Documents
-
view
217 -
download
0
Transcript of S TREAM D EVELOPMENT AND L ONGITUDINAL S TREAM P ROFILES.
![Page 1: S TREAM D EVELOPMENT AND L ONGITUDINAL S TREAM P ROFILES.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032517/56649cc05503460f94986eee/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
STREAM DEVELOPMENT AND LONGITUDINAL STREAM PROFILES
![Page 2: S TREAM D EVELOPMENT AND L ONGITUDINAL S TREAM P ROFILES.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032517/56649cc05503460f94986eee/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
OBJECTIVE
Look at factors that affect stream development
Determine how streams vary by region and difference in factors
Ultimately be able to compare stream profiles and determine anomalous segments in profile
![Page 3: S TREAM D EVELOPMENT AND L ONGITUDINAL S TREAM P ROFILES.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032517/56649cc05503460f94986eee/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
OUTLINE
Longitudinal profiles and what controls stream development
Profiles by region
Methods of obtaining stream profiles
Comparing stream profiles
![Page 4: S TREAM D EVELOPMENT AND L ONGITUDINAL S TREAM P ROFILES.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032517/56649cc05503460f94986eee/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
LONGITUDINAL STREAM PROFILES
Shows distance vs. elevation of a stream
![Page 5: S TREAM D EVELOPMENT AND L ONGITUDINAL S TREAM P ROFILES.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032517/56649cc05503460f94986eee/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
LONGITUDINAL STREAM PROFILES Changes on tectonic conditions, climate, or geology cause
changes in profile (Cherkauer, 1972). The main factors that affect its slope are discharge,
drainage area, and size of material in the stream bed (Hack, 1957).
Typical profile is concave-up
![Page 6: S TREAM D EVELOPMENT AND L ONGITUDINAL S TREAM P ROFILES.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032517/56649cc05503460f94986eee/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
SUSQUEHANNA RIVER
Convex profile Little uplift Changes in base
level and geology play a more important role than uplift.
Carlston (1969) found 8 streams draining to Atlantic to be convex
Ydtalk.com
![Page 7: S TREAM D EVELOPMENT AND L ONGITUDINAL S TREAM P ROFILES.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032517/56649cc05503460f94986eee/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
PROFILES IN MARYLAND AND VIRGINIA
Shorter streams that help show variation in geology
Schist & sandstone slopes decrease more gradually compared to shale or less resistant units (Hack, 1957)
![Page 8: S TREAM D EVELOPMENT AND L ONGITUDINAL S TREAM P ROFILES.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032517/56649cc05503460f94986eee/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
TEXAS PROFILES
Most profiles in TX have a long and concave profile
Some exceptions are nearly linear (slightly concave)- Rio Jemez and Matthole River. Constant incision
rate Not very
tectonically active
Tinkler, K.J., 1998
![Page 9: S TREAM D EVELOPMENT AND L ONGITUDINAL S TREAM P ROFILES.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032517/56649cc05503460f94986eee/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
PROFILE SEGMENTS Not all profiles follow one pattern Streams can be made up of segments based on differences in
slope and shape
![Page 10: S TREAM D EVELOPMENT AND L ONGITUDINAL S TREAM P ROFILES.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032517/56649cc05503460f94986eee/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
ARIZONA STREAMS-SEGMENTED
Steep upstream (concave) Due to greater rate of
change of particle size and drainage area, and higher width to depth ratio of stream
Straight line downstream Ephemeral streams- exists
only after ppt (Cherkauer, 1972)
![Page 11: S TREAM D EVELOPMENT AND L ONGITUDINAL S TREAM P ROFILES.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032517/56649cc05503460f94986eee/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
GLACIAL PROFILES Wide and low gradient floors. Profiles characterized by steps shortly after tributary joins main
glacier (MacGragor et al, 2000)
![Page 12: S TREAM D EVELOPMENT AND L ONGITUDINAL S TREAM P ROFILES.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032517/56649cc05503460f94986eee/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
MAKING STREAM PROFILES
Plot of distance on x-axis vs. elevation above sea level on y-axis
Can infer from topographic maps (Hack, 1957) or DEMs (Snyder et al, 2000)
Survey in the field Once full profile is acquired, it can be broken
up into many segments based on shape
![Page 13: S TREAM D EVELOPMENT AND L ONGITUDINAL S TREAM P ROFILES.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032517/56649cc05503460f94986eee/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
STREAM-GRADIENT INDEX
Relates the slope of a stream to its length (Hack, 1973)
Allows you to compare different streams Can determine small knickzones/irregularities
SL= stream-gradient index ∆H= Change in elevation L= length of the Stream ∆L- Length of the specific reach of stream
![Page 14: S TREAM D EVELOPMENT AND L ONGITUDINAL S TREAM P ROFILES.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032517/56649cc05503460f94986eee/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
STREAM GRADIENT
Hack, 1957
![Page 15: S TREAM D EVELOPMENT AND L ONGITUDINAL S TREAM P ROFILES.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032517/56649cc05503460f94986eee/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
STREAM GRADIENT
Hack (1957) developed this formula based on profiles in humid regions on the East Coast
Still useful because easy to calculate
![Page 16: S TREAM D EVELOPMENT AND L ONGITUDINAL S TREAM P ROFILES.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032517/56649cc05503460f94986eee/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
CONCLUSION
Changes on tectonic conditions, climate, or geology cause changes in profile
Different regions show different profiles A single stream can have many segments Stream-gradient index is a useful calculation
to compare profiles
![Page 17: S TREAM D EVELOPMENT AND L ONGITUDINAL S TREAM P ROFILES.](https://reader030.fdocuments.in/reader030/viewer/2022032517/56649cc05503460f94986eee/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
REFERENCES CITED Anderson, J.K., Wondzell, S.M., Gooseff, M.N., Haggerty, R., 2005, Patterns in stream longitudinal profiles
and implications for hyporheic exchange flow at the H.J. Andrews Experimental Forest, Oregon, USA: Hydrological Processes, v. 19, p. 2931-2949.
Carlston, C.W., 1969, Longitudinal slope characteristics of rivers of the midcontinent and the Atlantic east gulf slopes: International Association of Scientific Hydrology Bulletin, v. 14, no. 4, p. 21-31.
Cherkauer, D.S., 1972, Longitudinal profiles of ephemeral streams in southeastern Arizona: GSA Bulletin, v. 83, p. 353-366.
Goldrick, G., Bishop, P., 2007, Regional analysis of bedrock stream long profiles: evaluation of Hack’s SL form, and formulation and assessment of an alternative (the DS form): Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, v. 32, p. 649-671, doi 10.1002/esp.1413.
Hack, J.T., 1957, Studies of Longitudinal Stream Profiles in Virginia and Maryland: U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 294-B, p. 42-97.
Hack, J.T., 1973, Stream-profile analysis and stream-gradient index: Journal Research U.S. Geological Survey, v. 1, no. 4, p. 421-429.
Larue, J.P., 2011, Longitudinal Profiles and Knickzones: the Example of the Rivers of the Cher in the Northern French Massif Central: The Geologists’ Association, v. 122, p. 125-142.
MacGregor K.R., Anderson, R.S., Anderson, S.P., Waddington, E.D., 2000, Numerical simulations of glacial-valley longitudinal profile evolution, v. 28, no. 11, p. 1031-1034.
Pazzaglia, F.J., Gardner, T.W., Merrits, D.J., 1998, Bedrock Fluvial Incision and Longitudinal Profile Development Over Geologic Time Scales Determined by Fluvial Terraces: Rivers Over Rock: Fluvial Processes in Bedrock Channels, p. 207-235.
Rosgen, D.L., 1994, A classification of natural rivers: Catena, v. 22, p. 169-199. Snyder, N.P., Whipple, K.X., Tucker, G.E., Merritts, D.J., 2000, Landscape response to tectonic forcing:
Digital elevation model analysis of stream profiles in the Mendocino triple junction region, northern California: GSA Bulletin, v. 112, no. 8, p. 1250-1263.
Woodside, J., Peterson, E. W., and Dogwiler, T., in review, Longitudinal profile and sediment mobility as geomorphic indicators within a fluviokarst stream system: Journal of Cave and Karst Studies.
Zimmerman, A.E., Church, M., Hassan, M.A., 2008, Identification of Steps and Pools from Stream Longitudinal Profile Data: Geomorphology, v. 102, p. 395-405.