s i’mn he smiymiyu’lmkhw

29
si’mn he smiymiyu’lmkhw Earth Knowledge Tool Exchange Network Opportunities Ashley McFarland Coeur d’Alene Tribe, Idaho

description

Exchange Network Opportunities Ashley McFarland Coeur d’Alene Tribe, Idaho. s i’mn he smiymiyu’lmkhw. Earth Knowledge Tool. Overview. Coeur d’Alene Tribe located in Plummer, Idaho Six employees in GIS staff Have worked with Exchange Network since 2003. Objectives. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of s i’mn he smiymiyu’lmkhw

Page 1: s i’mn he smiymiyu’lmkhw

si’mn he smiymiyu’lmkhwEarth Knowledge

Tool

Exchange Network

OpportunitiesAshley McFarland

Coeur d’Alene Tribe, Idaho

Page 2: s i’mn he smiymiyu’lmkhw

Overview• Coeur d’Alene Tribe

located in Plummer, Idaho

• Six employees in GIS staff

• Have worked with Exchange Network since 2003

2

Page 3: s i’mn he smiymiyu’lmkhw

Objectives• Describe each grant awarded• Explain the work done on each grant• Illustrate the deliverables of each grant• Show how GIS can be utilized • Explore suggestions from the Coeur

d’Alene Tribe

3

Page 4: s i’mn he smiymiyu’lmkhw

First Grant• Agricultural Burning, Smoke Management• Pesticide Inspection Management• Received in 2003—3 year project

4

Page 5: s i’mn he smiymiyu’lmkhw

Smoke Management Goals• Develop tool to

manage agricultural burning on the reservation

• Develop infrastructure to exchange data

• Collect baseline data

5

Page 6: s i’mn he smiymiyu’lmkhw

Infrastructure Development• Purchase and set-up

ArcIMS Web Server and Data Server

• Allowed data exchange within and outside of Tribe

• Exchanged data with EPA in Seattle , USGS in Spokane

• Providing metadata out to USGS Geospatial One Stop

6

Page 7: s i’mn he smiymiyu’lmkhw

Data Development• Mosaic work done on

orthophotography• Field

ownership/boundaries determined by Common Land Unit (CLU) and Public Land Survey (PLS)

7

Page 8: s i’mn he smiymiyu’lmkhw

BlueSky Data Integration• Predictive modeling

grid to estimate the cumulative effects of vegetative burning

• Data harvested to assess potential smoke conditions

8

Page 9: s i’mn he smiymiyu’lmkhw

Smoke Tool Development• Web-based tracking

mechanism– Burners– Permits– Fields

• Identify fields appropriate to burn– Prediction of smoke

movement– Available, permitted fields

9

Page 10: s i’mn he smiymiyu’lmkhw

10

Page 11: s i’mn he smiymiyu’lmkhw

Smoke Management Obstacles• Washington’s burn

dataset difficulties• Burn ban lawsuit– Short windows of

time to burn– Did not allow for

planning• Changing mindset

11

Page 12: s i’mn he smiymiyu’lmkhw

Pesticide Project Goals• Assist tribal inspector in tracking pesticide

inspections• Develop database• Conform to “pesticide standard”• Allow EPA and other tribes to see

inspection data

12

Page 13: s i’mn he smiymiyu’lmkhw

Pesticide Inspections• Tribal inspector works with six other tribes• Part of Circuit Rider Program• Wanted the ability to track inspections and

applicators to better plan future inspections

13

Page 14: s i’mn he smiymiyu’lmkhw

Database Development• Conform to proposed standards• Develop queriable database• Create forms for field entry

14

Page 15: s i’mn he smiymiyu’lmkhw

Pesticide Form Development• Based off of current field forms• Standardize and streamline• Forms undergoing “trial run”

15

Page 16: s i’mn he smiymiyu’lmkhw

Pesticide Database• Tracks– Use inspections– Follow-up/

complaint inspections

• Forms– Applicators– Employers– Pesticides– Samples– Aggrieved party

16

Page 17: s i’mn he smiymiyu’lmkhw

Pesticide Database Obstacles• Proposed standard

never adopted• Organizational

strategy• Flexibility

17

Page 18: s i’mn he smiymiyu’lmkhw

Pesticide Project Deliverables• Functional, searchable database• Accessible to government and tribal

institutions• Broader use of forms

18

Page 19: s i’mn he smiymiyu’lmkhw

19

Page 20: s i’mn he smiymiyu’lmkhw

Second Grant• Facility Registration System (FRS) Updates• One year project awarded in 2007

20

Page 21: s i’mn he smiymiyu’lmkhw

Facility Registration Goals• Registered sites– Update contact information– Update latitude/longitude positioning – Strengthen overall data integrity within

the FRS• Other– Purchase GPS unit– Survey Reservation to ensure facilities

properly registered21

Page 22: s i’mn he smiymiyu’lmkhw

Need for Improvement• Over 90

registered facilities throughout Reservation

• Only 1/3 of sites had spatial data—often incorrect

22

Page 23: s i’mn he smiymiyu’lmkhw

Need for Improvement

Plummer Forest Products

23

Page 24: s i’mn he smiymiyu’lmkhw

FRS Prep-Work• Took inventory of Reservation sites within

FRS• Made contact information updates where

possible• Researched and purchased GPS unit

24

Page 25: s i’mn he smiymiyu’lmkhw

FRS Update Work• Purchased GPS unit• Surveyed facilities• Reported facility updates• Produced semi-annual

reports

25

Page 26: s i’mn he smiymiyu’lmkhw

Facility Registration Deliverables• Updated tribal records• Improved data integrity for the EPA• Strengthened data sharing relationship

between the EPA and Tribe• Found areas to improve– Data integrity and currentness– Facility entries

26

Page 27: s i’mn he smiymiyu’lmkhw

Applicability to GIS• Allows spatial traceability of environmental

regulation• Useful in web-map interfaces such as

EnviroMapper• Assists in environmental management

planning• Data availability at Geospatial One Stop

27

Page 28: s i’mn he smiymiyu’lmkhw

Exchange Network Suggestions• Modify data framework• Service center vs. distributed data• Allow harvestable data to be posted

28

Page 29: s i’mn he smiymiyu’lmkhw

Questions?

Ashley McFarland208-686-2064amcfarland@cdatribe-

nsn.gov

29