S. No

Name & Address of the Applicant

Details of compliance /rejection of requestOffice Order No. Date

1. Mr. Neeraj Sharma,H.No. 758, FCA, Faridabad, Haryana

CBSE/AS/PA/RTI/2007/1451 07.06.07

Information asked under RTI:

Applicant has requested for database of AIEEE 2007 students who appeared from NCR region (Haryana, UP, Delhi) with their ranking.

REPLY:

This is with reference to your letters dated 17.05.07 and 18.05.07 under RTI Act wherein information pertaining to the students with their ranks in AIEEE 2007 has been sought with respect to four regions Haryana, NCR, UP and Delhi.

It may be mentioned that the student database cannot be provided to you since the Board shares a fiduciary relationship with the examinees. However, the results of AIEEE 2007 have been announced on 30.05.07 and are available on CBSE website www.cbseresults.nic.in and www.cbse.nic.in. The necessary information can be accessed from these websites which contain Roll No. and All India as well as State ranks.

S. No

Name & Address of the Applicant

Details of compliance /rejection of requestOffice Order No. Date

1. Mr. Pramod Kumar,Dwarka, DelhiRoll No. 21618356

39/RTI/AIEEE/13/1441 14.06.07

Information asked under RTI:

Copy of Answer Sheet and the solutions of the questions contained in the Test Booklet No. 7618606, Test Booklet Code – N of Roll No. 21618356.

REPLY:

Please refer to your letter dated 04.06.07 addressed to the undersigned regarding supply of information under Right to Information Act, 2005.

2. The information asked for cannot be supplied due to the following reasons:

(i) The information asked by you is exempted under Section 8 (1) (e) since CBSE shares fiduciary relationship with its evaluators and maintain confidentiality of both the manner and method of evaluation.

(ii) The AIEEE Answer Sheets are machine graded with extreme care and repeatedly scrutinized, there is no provision for rechecking/re-evaluation of answer sheets as per Clause – 12.5 of the Information Bulletin of AIEEE 2007.

(iii) The larger public interest does not warrant the disclosure of such information desired by you.

(iv) Central Information Commission on appeal No. CPB/A-3/CIC/2006 dated 10.02.2006 has also ruled out such disclosures.

But, keeping in view the interest of the candidate the Board has taken a lenient view and the Answer Sheets of the above candidate was got scrutinized by the expert and no mistake was detected and the marks earlier awarded to the candidate are correct.

2

S. No

Name & Address of the Applicant

Details of compliance /rejection of requestOffice Order No. Date

1. Mr. Pramod Kumar,Dwarka, DelhiRoll No. 21618356

39/RTI/AIEEE/2007/1513 20.07.07

Appeal under RTI against Rejection Order No. 39/RTI/AIEEE/13/1441 dated 14.06.07:

CASE:

Shri Pramod Kumar vide his application dated 09.07.07 had requested to furnish the following information:

(a) Copy of the solutions of the questions contained in the Test Booklet No. 7618606, Test Booklet Code – N pertaining to the Appellant bearing Roll No. 21618356 appeared in B.E./B. Tech (Paper-I).

(b) Copy of the Answer Sheet.

In this regard, Shri Pramod Kumar was informed vide our letter dated 14.06.07 that the information available with the public authority is in a fiduciary relationship. Since his request was purely personal the disclosure of which has no relation to any public interest or activity {Section 8 (1) (j)}. In view of above his request was not considered.

DECISION:

In view of the foregoing facts, it is stated that the reply given by Assistant Secretary (AIEEE)/APIO vide his letter dated 14.06.07 is correct.

3

S. No

Name & Address of the Applicant

Details of compliance /rejection of requestOffice Order No. Date

1. Mr. Nitesh Bhasin,Rohini, DelhiRoll No. 21639562

39/RTI/AIEEE/15/1440 14.06.07

Information asked under RTI:

Copy of Answer Sheet and marksheet/result sheet with respect to Roll No. 21639562.

REPLY:

Please refer to your letter dated 05.06.07 addressed to the undersigned regarding supply of information under Right to Information Act, 2005.

2. The information asked for cannot be supplied due to the following reasons:

(i) The information asked by you is exempted under Section 8 (1) (e) since CBSE shares fiduciary relationship with its evaluators and maintain confidentiality of both the manner and method of evaluation.

(ii) The AIEEE Answer Sheets are machine graded with extreme care and repeatedly scrutinized, there is no provision for rechecking/re-evaluation of answer sheets as per Clause – 12.5 of the Information Bulletin of AIEEE 2007.

(iii) The larger public interest does not warrant the disclosure of such information desired by you.

(iv) Central Information Commission on appeal No. CPB/A-3/CIC/2006 dated 10.02.2006 has also ruled out such disclosures.

But, keeping in view the interest of the candidate the Board has taken a lenient view and the Answer Sheets of the above candidate was got scrutinized by the expert and no mistake was detected and the marks earlier awarded to the candidate are correct.

4

S. No

Name & Address of the Applicant

Details of compliance /rejection of requestOffice Order No. Date

1. Mr. Praveen Kumar, 3474, Sec-35D, ChandigarhRoll No. 21400753

39/RTI/AIEEE/16/1442 14.06.07

Information asked under RTI:

Copy of Answer Sheet of Roll No. 21400753 (Ms. Richa Garg) with 10 other Answer Sheets of top students of Test Booklet Code – O.

REPLY:

Please refer to your letter dated 08.06.07 addressed to the undersigned regarding supply of information under Right to Information Act, 2005.

2. The information asked for cannot be supplied due to the following reasons:

(i) The information asked by you is exempted under Section 8 (1) (e) since CBSE shares fiduciary relationship with its evaluators and maintain confidentiality of both the manner and method of evaluation.

(ii) The AIEEE Answer Sheets are machine graded with extreme care and repeatedly scrutinized, there is no provision for rechecking/re-evaluation of answer sheets as per Clause – 12.5 of the Information Bulletin of AIEEE 2007.

(iii) The larger public interest does not warrant the disclosure of such information desired by you.

(iv) Central Information Commission on appeal No. CPB/A-3/CIC/2006 dated 10.02.2006 has also ruled out such disclosures.

But, keeping in view the interest of the candidate the Board has taken a lenient view and the Answer Sheets of the above candidate was got scrutinized by the expert and no mistake was detected and the marks earlier awarded to the candidate are correct.

5

S. No

Name & Address of the Applicant

Details of compliance /rejection of requestOffice Order No. Date

1. Mr. Ankit Verma, B-1/297, Sec-G, Jankipuram, Lucknow (UP)Roll No. 28114746

39/RTI/AIEEE/17/1443 14.06.07

Information asked under RTI:

Copy of Answer Sheet of Test Booklet Code - N with respect to Roll No. 28114746.

REPLY:

Please refer to your letter dated 05.06.07 addressed to the undersigned regarding supply of information under Right to Information Act, 2005.

2. The information asked for cannot be supplied due to the following reasons:

(i) The information asked by you is exempted under Section 8 (1) (e) since CBSE shares fiduciary relationship with its evaluators and maintain confidentiality of both the manner and method of evaluation.

(ii) The AIEEE Answer Sheets are machine graded with extreme care and repeatedly scrutinized, there is no provision for rechecking/re-evaluation of answer sheets as per Clause – 12.5 of the Information Bulletin of AIEEE 2007.

(iii) The larger public interest does not warrant the disclosure of such information desired by you.

(iv) Central Information Commission on appeal No. CPB/A-3/CIC/2006 dated 10.02.2006 has also ruled out such disclosures.

But, keeping in view the interest of the candidate the Board has taken a lenient view and the Answer Sheets of the above candidate was got scrutinized by the expert and no mistake was detected and the marks earlier awarded to the candidate are correct.

6

S. No

Name & Address of the Applicant

Details of compliance /rejection of requestOffice Order No. Date

1. Mr. Akshay Pathak,SDX-4, Minal ResidencyJ. K. Road, BhopalRoll No. 24205753

39/RTI/AIEEE/18/1438 14.06.07

Information asked under RTI:

Request for rechecking/re-verification of answer sheet of Roll No. 24205753 and Roll No. 24203613.

REPLY:

Please refer to your letter dated 02.06.07 addressed to the undersigned regarding supply of information under Right to Information Act, 2005.

2. The information asked for cannot be supplied due to the following reasons:

(i) The information asked by you is exempted under Section 8 (1) (e) since CBSE shares fiduciary relationship with its evaluators and maintain confidentiality of both the manner and method of evaluation.

(ii) The AIEEE Answer Sheets are machine graded with extreme care and repeatedly scrutinized, there is no provision for rechecking/re-evaluation of answer sheets as per Clause – 12.5 of the Information Bulletin of AIEEE 2007.

(iii) The larger public interest does not warrant the disclosure of such information desired by you.

(iv) Central Information Commission on appeal No. CPB/A-3/CIC/2006 dated 10.02.2006 has also ruled out such disclosures.

But, keeping in view the interest of the candidate the Board has taken a lenient view and the Answer Sheets of the above candidate was got scrutinized by the expert and no mistake was detected and the marks earlier awarded to the candidate are correct.

7

S. No

Name & Address of the Applicant

Details of compliance /rejection of requestOffice Order No. Date

1. Mr. Kariya M. AnantrayBhavnagar-364001 Roll No. 21805211

39/RTI/AIEEE/19/1437 14.06.07

Information asked under RTI:

Copy of Answer Sheet with respect to Roll No. 21805211.

REPLY:

Please refer to your letter dated Nil addressed to the undersigned regarding supply of information under Right to Information Act, 2005.

2. The information asked for cannot be supplied due to the following reasons:

(i) The information asked by you is exempted under Section 8 (1) (e) since CBSE shares fiduciary relationship with its evaluators and maintain confidentiality of both the manner and method of evaluation.

(ii) The AIEEE Answer Sheets are machine graded with extreme care and repeatedly scrutinized, there is no provision for rechecking/re-evaluation of answer sheets as per Clause – 12.5 of the Information Bulletin of AIEEE 2007.

(iii) The larger public interest does not warrant the disclosure of such information desired by you.

(iv) Central Information Commission on appeal No. CPB/A-3/CIC/2006 dated 10.02.2006 has also ruled out such disclosures.

But, keeping in view the interest of the candidate the Board has taken a lenient view and the Answer Sheets of the above candidate was got scrutinized by the expert and no mistake was detected and the marks earlier awarded to the candidate are correct.

8

S. No

Name & Address of the Applicant

Details of compliance /rejection of requestOffice Order No. Date

1. Mr. Suken Das, P.O. Bijni, Dist. Chirang, Assam – 783390Roll No. 20903605

39/RTI/AIEEE/20/1436 14.06.07

Information asked under RTI:

Copy of Answer Script of AIEEE 2007 pertaining to Roll No. 20903605.

REPLY:

Please refer to your letter dated 07.06.07 addressed to the undersigned regarding supply of information under Right to Information Act, 2005.

2. The information asked for cannot be supplied due to the following reasons:

(i) The information asked by you is exempted under Section 8 (1) (e) since CBSE shares fiduciary relationship with its evaluators and maintain confidentiality of both the manner and method of evaluation.

(ii) The AIEEE Answer Sheets are machine graded with extreme care and repeatedly scrutinized, there is no provision for rechecking/re-evaluation of answer sheets as per Clause – 12.5 of the Information Bulletin of AIEEE 2007.

(iii) The larger public interest does not warrant the disclosure of such information desired by you.

(iv) Central Information Commission on appeal No. CPB/A-3/CIC/2006 dated 10.02.2006 has also ruled out such disclosures.

But, keeping in view the interest of the candidate the Board has taken a lenient view and the Answer Sheets of the above candidate was got scrutinized by the expert and no mistake was detected and the marks earlier awarded to the candidate are correct.

9

S. No

Name & Address of the Applicant

Details of compliance /rejection of requestOffice Order No. Date

1. Mr. Suken Das, P.O. Bijni, Dist. Chirang, Assam – 783390Roll No. 20903605

39/RTI/AIEEE/2007/1507 16.07.07

Appeal under RTI against Rejection Order No. 39/RTI/AIEEE/20/1436 dated 14.06.07:

CASE:Shri Suken Das vide his application dated 26.06.07 had requested to

furnish the following information:

(a) Answer Script of AIEEE-2007 pertaining to the Appellant bearing Roll No. 20903605 appeared in B.E./B. Tech (Paper-I) from centre at Guwahati.

In this regard, Shri Suken Das was informed vide our letter dated 14.06.07 that the information available with the public authority is in a fiduciary relationship. Since his request was purely personal the disclosure of which has no relation to any public interest or activity {Section 8 (1) (j)}. In view of above his request was not considered.

DECISION:

In view of the foregoing facts, it is stated that the reply given by Assistant Secretary (AIEEE)/APIO vide his letter dated 14.06.07 is correct.

10

S. No

Name & Address of the Applicant

Details of compliance /rejection of requestOffice Order No. Date

1. Mr. Rohit, N-2, Andrews Ganj Ext., New DelhiRoll No. 21610739

39/RTI/AIEEE/21/1461 22.06.07

Information asked under RTI:

Request for rechecking/re-verification of result pertaining to Roll No. 21610739.

REPLY:

Please refer to your letter dated 13.06.07 addressed to the undersigned regarding supply of information under Right to Information Act, 2005.

2. The information asked for cannot be supplied due to the following reasons:

(i) The information asked by you is exempted under Section 8 (1) (e) since CBSE shares fiduciary relationship with its evaluators and maintain confidentiality of both the manner and method of evaluation.

(ii) The AIEEE Answer Sheets are machine graded with extreme care and repeatedly scrutinized, there is no provision for rechecking/re-evaluation of answer sheets as per Clause – 12.5 of the Information Bulletin of AIEEE 2007.

(iii) The larger public interest does not warrant the disclosure of such information desired by you.

(iv) Central Information Commission on appeal No. CPB/A-3/CIC/2006 dated 10.02.2006 has also ruled out such disclosures.

But, keeping in view the interest of the candidate the Board has taken a lenient view and the Answer Sheets of the above candidate was got scrutinized by the expert and no mistake was detected and the marks earlier awarded to the candidate are correct.

11

S. No

Name & Address of the Applicant

Details of compliance /rejection of requestOffice Order No. Date

1. Mr. Rohit Kumar,C/o Mr. U. S. BhardwajNational Horticulture Board, 2nd Floor, Mayukh Bhawan, Salt Lake, Kolkata (WB)Roll No. 28508255

39/RTI/AIEEE/22/1462 22.06.07

Information asked under RTI:

Number of answers are correct in the answer sheet of Roll No. 28508255.Number of answers are not correct in answer sheet of Roll No. 28508255.

REPLY:

Please refer to your letter dated 11.06.07 addressed to the undersigned regarding supply of information under Right to Information Act, 2005.

2. The information asked for cannot be supplied due to the following reasons:

(i) The information asked by you is exempted under Section 8 (1) (e) since CBSE shares fiduciary relationship with its evaluators and maintain confidentiality of both the manner and method of evaluation.

(ii) The AIEEE Answer Sheets are machine graded with extreme care and repeatedly scrutinized, there is no provision for rechecking/re-evaluation of answer sheets as per Clause – 12.5 of the Information Bulletin of AIEEE 2007.

(iii) The larger public interest does not warrant the disclosure of such information desired by you.

(iv) Central Information Commission on appeal No. CPB/A-3/CIC/2006 dated 10.02.2006 has also ruled out such disclosures.

But, keeping in view the interest of the candidate the Board has taken a lenient view and the Answer Sheets of the above candidate was got scrutinized by the expert and no mistake was detected and the marks earlier awarded to the candidate are correct.

12

S. No

Name & Address of the Applicant

Details of compliance /rejection of requestOffice Order No. Date

1. Mr. Vaibhav Taneja, C-MIG, World Bank Colony, Barra, Kanpur – 208027 (UP)Roll No. 28206933

39/RTI/AIEEE/23/1463 22.06.07

Information asked under RTI:

Reasons for awarding less marks and provide Photostat of Answer Sheet pertaining to Roll No. 28206933Why allotted centre at Noida instead of Kanpur, Lucknow and Varanasi (Centre opted in application form).

REPLY:

Please refer to your letter dated 12.06.07 addressed to the undersigned regarding supply of information under Right to Information Act, 2005.

2. The information asked for cannot be supplied due to the following reasons:

(i) The information asked by you is exempted under Section 8 (1) (e) since CBSE shares fiduciary relationship with its evaluators and maintain confidentiality of both the manner and method of evaluation.

(ii) The AIEEE Answer Sheets are machine graded with extreme care and repeatedly scrutinized, there is no provision for rechecking/re-evaluation of answer sheets as per Clause – 12.5 of the Information Bulletin of AIEEE 2007.

(iii) The larger public interest does not warrant the disclosure of such information desired by you.

(iv) Central Information Commission on appeal No. CPB/A-3/CIC/2006 dated 10.02.2006 has also ruled out such disclosures.

But, keeping in view the interest of the candidate the Board has taken a lenient view and the Answer Sheets of the above candidate was got scrutinized by the expert and no mistake was detected and the marks earlier awarded to the candidate are correct.

13

S. No

Name & Address of the Applicant

Details of compliance /rejection of requestOffice Order No. Date

1. Ms. Shweta Joshi,Akola, MaharastraRoll No. 24606848

39/RTI/AIEEE/19/1475 29.06.07

Information asked under RTI:

Copy of Answer Sheet of AIEEE 2007 pertaining to Roll No. 24606848.

REPLY:

Please refer to your letter dated 08.06.07 addressed to the undersigned regarding supply of information under Right to Information Act, 2005.

2. The information asked for cannot be supplied due to the following reasons:

(i) The information asked by you is exempted under Section 8 (1) (e) since CBSE shares fiduciary relationship with its evaluators and maintain confidentiality of both the manner and method of evaluation.

(ii) The AIEEE Answer Sheets are machine graded with extreme care and repeatedly scrutinized, there is no provision for rechecking/re-evaluation of answer sheets as per Clause – 12.5 of the Information Bulletin of AIEEE 2007.

(iii) The larger public interest does not warrant the disclosure of such information desired by you.

(iv) Central Information Commission on appeal No. CPB/A-3/CIC/2006 dated 10.02.2006 has also ruled out such disclosures.

But, keeping in view the interest of the candidate the Board has taken a lenient view and the Answer Sheets of the above candidate was got scrutinized by the expert and no mistake was detected and the marks earlier awarded to the candidate are correct.

14

S. No

Name & Address of the Applicant

Details of compliance /rejection of requestOffice Order No. Date

1. Mr. Ankit GoyalA-48, Greater Brijeshwari,Pipliya Hana ChaurahaIndore (MP)Roll No. 24502619

39/RTI/AIEEE/24/1474 29.06.07

Information asked under RTI:

Copy of Answer Sheet of AIEEE 2007 pertaining to Roll No. 24502619.

REPLY:

Please refer to your letter dated 17.06.07 addressed to the undersigned regarding supply of information under Right to Information Act, 2005.

2. The information asked for cannot be supplied due to the following reasons:

(v) The information asked by you is exempted under Section 8 (1) (e) since CBSE shares fiduciary relationship with its evaluators and maintain confidentiality of both the manner and method of evaluation.

(vi) The AIEEE Answer Sheets are machine graded with extreme care and repeatedly scrutinized, there is no provision for rechecking/re-evaluation of answer sheets as per Clause – 12.5 of the Information Bulletin of AIEEE 2007.

(vii) The larger public interest does not warrant the disclosure of such information desired by you.

(viii) Central Information Commission on appeal No. CPB/A-3/CIC/2006 dated 10.02.2006 has also ruled out such disclosures.

But, keeping in view the interest of the candidate the Board has taken a lenient view and the Answer Sheets of the above candidate was got scrutinized by the expert and no mistake was detected and the marks earlier awarded to the candidate are correct.

15

S. No

Name & Address of the Applicant

Details of compliance /rejection of requestOffice Order No. Date

1. Mr. Ankit GoyalA-48, Greater Brijeshwari,Pipliya Hana ChaurahaIndore (MP)Roll No. 24502619

39/RTI/AIEEE/24/1474 29.06.07

Appeal under RTI against Rejection Order No. 39/RTI/AIEEE/20/1436 dated 14.06.07:

CASE:Shri Ankit Goyal vide his application dated 08.08.07 had requested to furnish

the following information:

(c) Copy of the Answer Sheet.(d) Copy of Standard Answer Key and (e) Rank Chart for B. E. Tech Course in respect of Madhya Pradesh in

the desired format for AIEEE 2007.

The request of Shri Ankit Goyal dated 08.08.07 has again been considered sympathetically by the undersigned as the Appellate Authority and the answer sheet of the candidate has again been verified with the relevant key by experts and no mistake has already been detected. The entire details of result are already made available to the public on Board’s website www.aieee.nic.in and may be downloaded, if needed.

In this regard, Shri Ankit Goyal was informed vide our letter dated 09.07.07 that the information available with the Board is in a fiduciary relationship. Since his request was purely personal the disclosure of which has no relation to any public interest or activity {Section 8 (1) (j)}. In view of above, his request was not considered.

DECISION:

In view of the foregoing facts, it is stated that the reply given by Assistant Secretary (AIEEE)/APIO vide his letter dated 09.07.07 is correct.

16

S. No

Name & Address of the Applicant

Details of compliance /rejection of requestOffice Order No. Date

1. Mr. Uma Shankar,Lohia NagarGondda (UP)

39/RTI/AIEEE/25/1476 29.06.07

Information asked under RTI:

Number of candidates applied for AIEEE 2007, number of candidates in SC category and minimum cut off for SC candidates.

REPLY:

With reference to your letter dated Nil regarding AIEEE 2007 examination under RTI Act, 2005. The desired information is as under: -

1. Total number of candidates registered in Paper-I of AIEEE 2007

Total Candidates: - 6,41,276SC Candidates: - 48,939

2. Candidates eligible for Central Counselling Total Candidates: - 97,606SC Candidates: - 26,925

3. Minimum Cut Off Marks for Central Counselling

18 marks for SC candidates

This is your kind information.

17

S. No

Name & Address of the Applicant

Details of compliance /rejection of requestOffice Order No. Date

1. Dr. V. J. Gulhane,Sarika Medical Store, Chandan Nagar, Pune - 411014

39/RTI/AIEEE/26/1523 25.07.07

Information asked under RTI:

(i) Information to prepare a survey of Maharashtra State student who had appeared in the AIEEE Examination 2007.

(ii) Utilise the said information for public interest free of cost.(iii) The said information for those students who are eligible for Central

Counselling only or upto state 21 i.e. Maharashtra upto rank 1000 only.(iv) The required information be given in the following format:

S. No

Name of student

AIEEE Roll No.

All India Rank

Maharashtra State Rank

Marks only for Engg.

XII passed from

XII year of passing

Remarks, categoryGen/SC/ ST/OBC

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

REPLY:

Please refer to your letter dated 03.06.07 received on 02.07.07 addressed to the undersigned regarding supply of information under Right to Information Act, 2005.

2. The information asked for cannot be supplied due to the following reasons:

(i) The information asked by you is exempted under Section 8 (1) (e) since CBSE shares fiduciary relationship with its evaluators and maintain confidentiality of both the manner and method of evaluation.

(ii) The larger public interest does not warrant the disclosure of such information desired by you.

(iii) Central Information Commission on appeal No. CPB/A-3/CIC/2006 dated 10.02.2006 has also ruled out such disclosures.

18

S. No

Name & Address of the Applicant

Details of compliance /rejection of requestOffice Order No. Date

1. Mr. Madan KingerO-9, 2nd Floor, Sriniwas Puri, New Delhi

39/RTI/AIEEE/27/1506 13.07.07

Information asked under RTI:

Eligibility criteria for B. Arch/B. Planning for AIEEE 2008.

REPLY:

Reference your application under RTI regarding the subject cited above, it is to inform you that the matter is sub-judice in the Hon’ble High Court of Delhi and the qualifications prescribed for AIEEE-2007, were as per the interim orders of the High Court and the qualification for AIEEE 2008 is yet to be finalized and will be declared publicly as and when finalized. However, as per the existing qualifications, candidates with more than 50% marks in aggregate with Mathematics as subject of examination at 10+2 level is qualified to appear in B. Arch/B. Planning.

19

S. No

Name & Address of the Applicant

Details of compliance /rejection of requestOffice Order No. Date

1. Mr. Tej Singh Varun,B-4/214, Safdarjung Enclave, New Delhi - 110029

39/RTI/AIEEE/28/1552 08.08.07

Information asked under RTI:

(i) Number of candidates appeared in AIEEE in 2005, 2006 & 2007 category-wise

(ii) Number of candidates declared eligible for Central Counselling(iii) Number of candidates declared eligible for Central Counselling having

marks equal to General Category

REPLY:

Reference your letter-dated 30.06.07 received on 13.07.07 the details are as follows:

(i) Number of students appeared in AIEEE/DCE in 2005, 2006 & 2007 category wise: Category 2005 2006 2007SC 32950 40767 54065ST 9547 11481 15243GEN/OBC 393551 471563 575450Total 436048 523811 644758

(ii) Number of students declared eligible for Central Counselling:Category 2005 2006 2007SC 6689 6445 26901ST 3158 2615 6665GEN/OBC 38806 50277 63994Total 48653 59337 97560

(iii) Number of candidates declared eligible for Central Counselling having marks equal to General Category:

Category 2005 2006 2007SC 664 1180 1877ST 142 323 522GEN/OBC 38806 50277 62257Total 39612 51780 64656

The remaining information pertains to the Central Counselling Board and as such you are requested to contact Central Counselling Board in the matter.

20

S. No

Name & Address of the Applicant

Details of compliance /rejection of requestOffice Order No. Date

1. Mr. Akshay Pathak,SDX-4, Minal ResidencyJ. K. Road, BhopalRoll No. 24205753

39/RTI/AIEEE/2007/29 06.08.07

Information asked under RTI:

Photocopies of OMR of the following roll numbers appeared in AIEEE 2007: (i) 24205763(ii) 24205753(iii) 24203613(iv) 24204129

REPLY:

Please refer to your letter dated 12.07.07 addressed to Secretary, CBSE regarding supply of information under Right to Information Act, 2005. The information asked for cannot be supplied due to the reasons earlier intimated to you by the PIO vide letter dated _________.

But keeping in view your representation and the interest of the candidates the Board has taken a lenient view and the Answer Sheets of all the candidates mentioned in your letter dated 12.07.07 and 14.07.07 were got scrutinized by the expert and no mistake was detected and the marks earlier awarded to the candidate are correct.

21

S. No

Name & Address of the Applicant

Details of compliance /rejection of requestOffice Order No. Date

1. Mr. S. A. Joshi,“MATOSHREE’, Kela Plots, Jatharpeth, Akola (M.S.)

39/RTI/AIEEE/2007 25.07.07

Information asked under RTI:

(i) Copy of Appeal No. ICPB/A-3/CIC/2006 dated 10.02.06(ii) Name & Address of Appellate Authority.

REPLY:

Please refer to your letter dated 03.06.07 received on 02.07.07 addressed to the undersigned regarding supply of information under Right to Information Act, 2005.

2. The information asked for cannot be supplied due to the following reasons:

(i) The information asked by you is exempted under Section 8 (1) (e) since CBSE shares fiduciary relationship with its evaluators and maintain confidentiality of both the manner and method of evaluation.

(ii) The larger public interest does not warrant the disclosure of such information desired by you.

(iii) Central Information Commission on appeal No. CPB/A-3/CIC/2006 dated 10.02.2006 has also ruled out such disclosures.

The Appellate Authority is: - HOD (Spl. Exams), AIEEE

Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE)Shiksha Sadan, 17, Rouse Avenue,

New Delhi – 110002.

22

S. No

Name & Address of the Applicant

Details of compliance /rejection of requestOffice Order No. Date

1. Mr. S. A. Joshi,“MATOSHREE’, Kela Plots, Jatharpeth, Akola (M.S.)

39/RTI/AIEEE/2007/1663 03.09.07

Appeal against rejection order No. 39/RTI/AIEEE/19/1475 dated 29.06.07

CASE:

Shri Shrikant A. Joshi vide his application dated 20.08.07 had demanded the copy of the Answers of Test Booklet Code ‘J’.

The request of Shri Shrikant A. Joshi dated 20.08.07 has again been considered sympathetically by the undersigned as the Appellate Authority and the answer sheet of the candidate have again been verified with the relevant key by experts and no mistake has been detected.

In this regard, Shri Shrikant A. Joshi was informed vide letter dated 25.07.07 that the information available with the Board is in a fiduciary relationship. Since his request was purely personal the disclosure of which has no relation to any public interest or activity {Section 8 (1) (j)}. In view of above, his request was not considered.

DECISION:

In view of the foregoing facts, it is stated that the reply given by Assistant Secretary (AIEEE)/APIO vide his letter dated 25.07.07 is correct.

23

S. No

Name & Address of the Applicant

Details of compliance /rejection of requestOffice Order No. Date

1. Mr. J. N. SharmaNational Institute of Technology, Hamirpur,HP –177005

39/RTI/AIEEE/07/34/1671 10.09.07

Information asked under RTI:

Copy of the representation dated 11.06.07 of Khushal GuptaCopy of the letter issued by HOD (Spl. Exams)Copy of the old and revised result card in respect of Khushal Gupta

REPLY:

Please refer to your RTI application received on 27.07.07 on the above subject asking therein:

1. Copy of the representation dated 11.06.07 of Khushal Gupta. 2. Copy of the letter issued by HOD (Spl. Exams).3. Copy of the old and revised result card in respect of Khushal Gupta

It may be mentioned here that the information at Serial No. 1 and 2 cannot be shared since it is third party information (Section 11 of RTI Act). Further, it is felt that the information asked for is purely personal in nature and no public interest will be served {Section 8 (1) (j) of RTI Act}.

As regards information about the result of the candidate it is hereby informed that the current status is available on CBSE website www.aieee.nic.in which is a public domain and can be easily accessed. However, copy of the result card is enclosed for your reference.

In case you wish to represent against the decision you can make an appeal within 30 days (under section 19 of the RTI Act) of the issue of this order to the first Appellate Authority as given below: -

The HOD (Special Exams)Central Board of Secondary Education

Shiksha Sadan, 17, Rouse Avenue, Institutional Area,New Delhi – 110002.

24

S. No

Name & Address of the Applicant

Details of compliance /rejection of requestOffice Order No. Date

1. Mr. Ranjeet SinghV&PO Sunhi, Tehsil Baroh, Distt. Kangra, Hamirpur,HP –176037

39/RTI/AIEEE/07/35/1672 10.09.07

Information asked under RTI:

Copy of the representation dated 11.06.07 of Khushal GuptaCopy of the letter issued by HOD (Spl. Exams)Copy of the old and revised result card in respect of Khushal Gupta

REPLY:

Please refer to your RTI application received on 27.07.07 on the above subject asking therein:

1. Copy of the representation dated 11.06.07 of Khushal Gupta. 2. Copy of the letter issued by HOD (Spl. Exams).3. Copy of the old and revised result card in respect of Khushal Gupta

It may be mentioned here that the information at Serial No. 1 and 2 cannot be shared since it is third party information (Section 11 of RTI Act). Further, it is felt that the information asked for is purely personal in nature and no public interest will be served {Section 8 (1) (j) of RTI Act}.

As regards information about the result of the candidate it is hereby informed that the current status is available on CBSE website www.aieee.nic.in which is a public domain and can be easily accessed. However, copy of the result card is enclosed for your reference.

In case you wish to represent against the decision you can make an appeal within 30 days (under section 19 of the RTI Act) of the issue of this order to the first Appellate Authority as given below: -

The HOD (Special Exams)Central Board of Secondary Education

Shiksha Sadan, 17, Rouse Avenue, Institutional Area,New Delhi – 110002.

25

S. No

Name & Address of the Applicant

Details of compliance /rejection of requestOffice Order No. Date

1. Mr. Damanjit Kaur,5B, MIG Flats, J. P. Nagar, JalandharPunjab - 144001

39/RTI/AIEEE/07/37/1673 10.09.07

Information asked under RTI:

Copy of the representation dated 11.06.07 of Khushal GuptaCopy of the letter issued by HOD (Spl. Exams)Copy of the old and revised result card in respect of Khushal Gupta

REPLY:

Please refer to your RTI application received on 27.07.07 on the above subject asking therein:

1. Copy of the representation dated 11.06.07 of Khushal Gupta. 2. Copy of the letter issued by HOD (Spl. Exams).3. Copy of the old and revised result card in respect of Khushal Gupta

It may be mentioned here that the information at Serial No. 1 and 2 cannot be shared since it is third party information (Section 11 of RTI Act). Further, it is felt that the information asked for is purely personal in nature and no public interest will be served {Section 8 (1) (j) of RTI Act}.

As regards information about the result of the candidate it is hereby informed that the current status is available on CBSE website www.aieee.nic.in which is a public domain and can be easily accessed. However, copy of the result card is enclosed for your reference.

In case you wish to represent against the decision you can make an appeal within 30 days (under section 19 of the RTI Act) of the issue of this order to the first Appellate Authority as given below: -

The HOD (Special Exams)Central Board of Secondary Education

Shiksha Sadan, 17, Rouse Avenue, Institutional Area,New Delhi – 110002.

26

S. No

Name & Address of the Applicant

Details of compliance /rejection of requestOffice Order No. Date

1. Mr. Atul PradhanNear Raja Badha, Mangla, PO Mangla,Bilaspur – 495001Chhattisgarh

39/RTI/AIEEE/07/44/1707 04.10.07

Information asked under RTI:

Copies of Act/Law/Rule/Policy/Circular/Notification/directive or any other relevant document which governs:

(i) The implementation of age restriction for all candidates for appearing in AIEEE.

(ii) The fixation of maximum upper age limit to 25 years for general candidates.

(iii) The fixation of maximum upper age limit to 30 years for SC/ST/PH candidates.

(iv) The fixation of maximum upper age limit for OBC candidates in the case of implementation of The Central Educational Institutions (Reservation in Admission) Bill 2006 in next session (if this information is not currently available, please provide the information that which law/rule/policy would be applicable in the fixation of maximum upper age limit for OBC candidates.

REPLY:

With reference to your request under RTI Act, 2005, I am to inform you that Ministry of Human Resource Development, Government of India has entrusted the responsibility of conducting the All India Engineering/Architecture Entrance Examination (AIEEE) to the Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE). The examination is conducted on all India basis to avoid multiplicity of examination for admission to Technical Courses in National Institute of Technologies (NITs), Indian Institute of Information Technologies (IITs), Central Universities and Deemed Universities and also the State Level Institutions who opted to take part in this examination. The Implementation Committee appointed by the Board for conduct of AIEEE govern the rules and regulations, eligibility criteria including age and relaxation to various categories of students in accordance with the policies and instructions of the Government of India from time to time. It is to further inform you that the information supplied by the candidate while filling the application form is subject to verification at the time of admission by the concerned admitting institutions.

Changes/corrections/modifications if any, in eligibility criteria of AIEEE 2008 will be notified in leading newspapers and will also be made available on Board’s website www.cbse.nic.in & www.aieee.nic.in, which may be visited for latest updations.

27

28

S. No

Name & Address of the Applicant

Details of compliance /rejection of requestOffice Order No. Date

1. Mr. M. Balan, Chenicheri House, Aroli, Pappinisseri,Kannur - 670566

39/RTI/AIEEE/07/44/1699 25.09.07

Information asked under RTI:

Refund of Couselling fee of Rs. 15000/-.

REPLY:

The matter has been forwarded to The Secretary, Central Counselling Board, Delhi College of Engineering, Bawana Road, Delhi – 110042 vide this Office letter No. AS/EA/AIEE/2007/1698 dated 25.09.07 for necessary action.

29

S. No

Name & Address of the Applicant

Details of compliance /rejection of requestOffice Order No. Date

1. Mr. Sushil Kumar,903, Raval Tower, Plot No. 16, Sector-11,CBD Belapur, Navi Mumbai - 400614

39/RTI/AIEEE/07/45/1723 08.10.07

Information asked under RTI:

(i) Number of qualified students who were allowed for Counselling by setting Cut off marks by the board in all categories in AIEEE 2007 for seeking admission to the first year of four year degree course in Engineering/Technology.

(ii) Number of students who got plus side marks in their examination under Physically Challenged/Handicapped/Disable category in AIEEE 2007.

(iii) Cut off marks set by the Board for Physically Challenged/Handicapped/Disabled students in all caste, creed & category for seeking admission to the first year of four year degree course in Engineering/Technology,

(iv) Number of Physically Challenged/Handicapped/Disabled students qualified as per cut off marks set by the Board in all streams/branches of the engineering/technology courses.

REPLY:

This is with reference to your letter regarding the information related to AIEEE 2007, the point wise information from A to D is as follows: -

A. Number of qualified students who were recommended for counselling in all categories on the basis of their performance in AIEEE 2007 were 97557.

B. Number of students who got One or more marks in AIEEE 2007 under PH/disable categories were 3073.

C. The cut off marks for AIEEE 2007 for PH/disabled students in all caste, categories etc were 18 or more marks for admission through Central Counselling Board.

D. 2127 PH/handicapped/disabled students who scored marks as prescribed above were declared ‘Eligible for Central Counselling’ in all streams.

As regards points E, F and G relates to Central Counselling Board, as such, you are advised to contact CCB, Delhi. A copy of your representation has already been forwarded to them by the Board for suitable reply.

30

31

S. No

Name & Address of the Applicant

Details of compliance /rejection of requestOffice Order No. Date

1. Mr. Rakesh Maheshwary,46, The Mall, Hanuman ChowkBhatinda – 151001

39/RTI/AIEEE/07/46/1729 09.10.07

Information asked under RTI:

Marks scored by Toppers in AIEEE 2007

REPLY:

With reference to your request received on 03.10.07, the information required by you concerning AIEEE 2007 is given below: -

Subject wise marks scored Physics Chemistry

Maths Total

100 ranker 106 100 109 315500 ranker 89 102 105 296

1000 ranker 99 92 93 2842000 ranker 87 93 88 2684000 ranker 78 87 82 247

10000 ranker 72 81 58 21120000 ranker 81 74 22 17730000 ranker 44 43 67 15440000 ranker 37 61 40 13850000 ranker 65 17 43 12575000 ranker 33 36 33 102

100000 ranker 30 21 35 86

This is for your kind information.

32

S. No

Name & Address of the Applicant

Details of compliance /rejection of requestOffice Order No. Date

1. Mr. Prasanjit Banik,Kailash ApartmentsFlat No. C-2, Hazi Safiruddin Road, Paltan Bazar, GuwahatiAssam – 781008

39/RTI/AIEEE/07/48/1555 09.08.07

Information asked under RTI:

Eligibility criteria of AIEEE 2007. REPLY:

Reference your letter dated 1st August 2007 for getting information under RTI Act, 2005, it is to inform you that you have not submitted the requisite fee for procuring information under RTI. However, the above said information is available on our website i.e. www.aieee.nic.in. Still if any additional specific information is required than the required fee may be remitted in favour of Secretary, CBSE, New Delhi.

33

Sl. No

Name & Address of the Applicant

Details of compliance /rejection of requestOffice Order No. Date

1. Shri Sonsai SahuC/o Shri Dilip DevanganChunudevangan, KhamambadiLal Baagicha, Dist. – DhamtariChhattisgarh – 493 773

DS/PA/AIEEE/JNV/2007/1092

07.09.2007

Information asked under RTI:

Request for document required under RTI Act. – reg. REPLY:

Please refer to your application seeking information from CBSE, regarding candidate Ghanshyam, bearing Roll No. – B – 0053 who appeared in JNVST – 2007. The required request for information was considered by the CBSE and I am directed to inform you, that, photocopy of Question Paper, Answer Sheet/Model Answer Sheet, cannot be provided as these are confidential documents. The candidate has obtained 83 marks under OBC/ Urban category.

34

Sl. No

Name & Address of the Applicant

Details of compliance /rejection of requestOffice Order No. Date

1. The PrincipalJawahar Navodaya VidyalayaKodinar, Dist. – JunagadhGujarat

JNV/VI/2007/1013 19.09.2007

Information asked under RTI:

Information about candidates appeared and selected in JNVST – 2007 – reg. REPLY:

Please refer to your letter to this office alongwith Application of Shri Sabariya Mahesh Kumar regarding information about the candidates appeared and selected in JNVST – 2007, for JNV, Kodinar, Dist. – Junagadh (Gujarat).In this regard I write to inform you that the required information have already been given to the concerned applicant by you. We have no other information except the above, as CBSE is only an examining agency for NVS.

Sl. N

Name & Address of the Applicant

Details of compliance /rejection of requestOffice Order No. Date

35

o1. Shri Suresh Kumar

Prop. Star DecoratorNear Four Star CinemaGokul Krishna Ashram RoadPurnea (Bihar)

No. RTI/JNVST/2007/1279 25.09.2007

Information asked under RTI:

Information about reservation in the category of seats in JNV, Purnea, Bihar – reg. REPLY:

Please refer to your letter seeking, information about reservation in the category of seats in Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya (JNV), Purnea, Bihar under RTI Act dated 18.09.2007. In this regard, I am directed to inform you that the seat matrix of category wise seats is a policy matter of Navodaya Vidyalaya Samiti (NVS) for the district. This year as per their policy 80 seats were allocated to Purnea District as shown in the result sheet attached, which was declared for 2007 – 08.It is also for your information that CBSE is examining body for NVS and we have no role in seat distribution.

Sl. Name & Address of the Details of compliance /rejection of request

36

No

Applicant Office Order No. Date

1. Shri Ashok Kumar ShuklaAssistant Commissioner (Admn.)Navodaya Vidyalaya SamitiLekhraj Panna, 3rd Floor, Sector – 02Vikas Nagar, Lucknow – 226 022Uttar Pradesh

DS/PA/AIEEE/2007/1131 11.10.2007

Information asked under RTI:

Non issue of certificates by CBSE after completing Class – X examination - reg. REPLY:

The letter on the above cited subject is returned herewith to you, as it has nothing to do with JNVST. The concerned office is CBSE, Regional Office, 35 – B, Civil Lines, Allahabad – 211 001, Uttar Pradesh. Therefore, you are advised to write to them for the desired information.

37

Sl. No

Name & Address of the Applicant

Details of compliance /rejection of requestOffice Order No. Date

1. Shri Saroj Kumar SahuSahu Building, P.O. – Adgaon,District – Bargarh, Orissa

DS/PA/JNV/2007/ 15.11.2007

Information asked under RTI:

Information about the Answer Sheet of the candidate – reg. REPLY:

Please refer to your letter seeking information under RTI Act about the answer sheet of candidate bearing Roll No. – J 0443, JNV, Sambalpur, Orissa, the examination was held on 11th February, 2007. The answer sheet of above candidate has been received by this office Booklet No. – 5119388, Code – D, Roll No. - J - 0443.

Sl. N

Name & Address of the Applicant

Details of compliance /rejection of requestOffice Order No. Date

38

o1. Shri Sabaria Mahesh Kumar

SiddibhaiBabra, Near Babra Government Library, Jivan Para, S.B.S. Street, Babra, Dist. – Amreli – 365 421

DS/PA/JNV/2007/24(R&I) 06.11.2007

Information asked under RTI:

Information required about admission Test of JNVST – 2007 - reg. REPLY:

With reference to your appeal regarding information sought under Right to Information Act. This is for your information, that, the office has already communicated the Principal, JNV, Kodinar, Dist. – Junagadh, Gujarat.

39

Sl. No

Name & Address of the Applicant

Details of compliance /rejection of requestOffice Order No. Date

1. Shri Vikram Singh,A-501, Himalaya Apartments, Sector-5, Vasundhra, Ghaziabad (UP).

AS/EA/AIEEE/2007/1017 06.11.2007

Information asked under RTI:

Information required under RTI Act, 2005. REPLY:

The matter has been forwarded to The Secretary, Central Counselling Board, Delhi College of Engineering, Bawana Road, Delhi – 110042 vide this Office letter No. AS/EA/AIEE/2007/1017 dated 06.11.07 for suitable reply to the appellant under intimation to this office.

40

Sl. No

Name & Address of the Applicant

Details of compliance /rejection of requestOffice Order No. Date

1. Shri Shrikant Joshi,“Matoshree” Kela PlotsJatharpeth, Akola – 444005 (Maharashtra)

AS/EA/AIEEE/2007/1034 07.12.2007

Information asked under RTI:

Appeal under RTI. REPLY:

With reference to your letter dated 30.11.07, I am directed to inform you that your earlier requests have been considered by the Board as per the provisions under rules and as earlier intimated, the answer sheet of the candidate was verified by the experts and no mistake was detected and accordingly a reply was sent to you. As desired by you, 2nd Appellate Authority is: -

The Secretary,Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE),

Shiksha Kendra, 2, Community Centre,Preet Vihar, Delhi – 110092.

41

Sl. No

Name & Address of the Applicant

Details of compliance /rejection of requestOffice Order No. Date

1. Shri Shrikant Joshi,“Matoshree” Kela PlotsJatharpeth, Akola – 444005 (Maharashtra)

AS/EA/AIEEE/2007/1047 28.12.2007

Information asked under RTI:

Information required under Right to Information Act 2005 for Roll No. 21401856. REPLY:

Please refer to your letter-dated 03.01.08 addressed to the undersigned regarding supply of information under Right to Information Act, 2005. In this connection, it is submitted that the information asked by you cannot be supplied due to the following reasons:

(i) The information asked by you is exempted under Section 8 (1) (e) since CBSE shares fiduciary relationship with its evaluators and maintain confidentiality of both the manner and method of evaluation.

(ii) The larger public interest does not warrant the disclosure of such information desired by you.

(iii) Central Information Commission on appeal No. CPB/A-3/CIC/2006 dated 10.02.2006 has also ruled out such disclosures.

42

Sl. No

Name & Address of the Applicant

Details of compliance /rejection of requestOffice Order No. Date

1. Mr. Sushil Kumar,903, Raval Tower, Plot No. 16, Sector-11,CBD Belapur, Navi Mumbai - 400614

AS/EA/AIEEE/2007/1065 14.01.2008

Information asked under RTI:

Information asked under RTI Act, 2005.

REPLY:

This is with reference to your letter regarding the information related to AIEEE 2007, the point wise information from A, B & D is as follows: - No. Description AIEEE

2004 2005

2006

A Total Number of students of all categories declared “Eligible for Central Counselling” in all streams of Engineering/Technology.

39774

48653

59337

B Total Number of students of PH/Disabled Category who got one or more marks in the examination in all streams of Engineering/Technology.

1169 1278

1713

D Total Number of PH/Disabled Category students declared “Eligible for Central Counselling” inline with the cut off marks set by the CBSE/CCB in all streams of Engineering/Technology.

96 93 138

As regards points C, E to L relates to Central Counselling Board, as such, you are advised to contact CCB, Delhi. A copy of your representation has already been forwarded to them by the Board for suitable reply.

43

Sl. No

Name & Address of the Applicant

Details of compliance /rejection of requestOffice Order No. Date

1. Mr. Sushil Kumar,903, Raval Tower, Plot No. 16, Sector-11,CBD Belapur, Navi Mumbai - 400614

AS/EA/AIEEE/2007/1083 27.02.2008

Information asked under RTI:

Information asked under RTI Act, 2005.

REPLY:

With reference to your letter dated 28th January 2008 addressed to Shri Wajahat Habibullah, CIC, New Delhi, I am directed to inform you that the information concerning and available with CBSE has already been supplied to you, the rest of the information, as earlier intimated concerns to the Central Counselling Board and they have already been requested to provide the same to you. You are also requested to contact them for the information.

As regards the information regarding AIEEE 2003, it is to inform you that during the AIEEE 2003, the candidates were directly called for by the Central Counselling Board and not recommended by the CBSE.

44