Rushden Open Space, Recreation and Sport Study€¦ · 1.1 DLP Planning Ltd was commissioned by...

For and on behalf of Rushden Town Council

Rushden Open Space, Recreation and Sport Study

Rushden, Northamptonshire

Prepared by DLP Planning Ltd

London

October 2015

2

Rushden Town Council


October 2015

N322/2

DLP Consulting Group disclaims any responsibility to the client and others in respect of matters outside the scope of this report. This report has been prepared with reasonable skill, care and diligence. This report is confidential to the client and DLP Planning Ltd accepts no responsibility of whatsoever nature to third parties to whom this report or any part thereof is made known. Any such party relies upon the

report at their own risk.

Prepared by: …………………………….. Conor Doyle MTCP

Planner

Approved by: ……………………………… James Croucher MTP MRTPI

Senior Director

Date: October 2015

DLP Planning Ltd The Green House 41-42 Clerkenwell Green London EC1R 0DU

Tel: 020 3761 5390

3



October 2015

N322/2

Contents Page

S. Summary of Recommendations 4

1.0 Introduction 7

2.0 Methodology 8

3.0 National and Local Planning Context 10

4.0 Assessment of Open Space Needs 22

5.0 Assessment of Open Space 26

6.0 Assessment of Outdoor Sport 35

7.0 Assessment of Indoor Sport & Recreation 41

8.0 Conclusions 46

Appendices

1. Open Spaces Profiles 50

2. Ward maps 88

3. Open spaces audit table 94

4



October 2015

N322/2

SUMMARY of RECOMMENDATIONS

S1. Within this Study a comprehensive range of recreational open spaces are assessed

within the town. These include spaces for children’s play provision, natural and semi-

natural greenspace and allotment needs. Allied to this, the level of both outdoor and

indoor sports provision in Rushden is also assessed.

S2. The assessment concludes that the existing level of children’s play provision is ‘fair’,

with opportunity to increase the quality and/or quantum of provision within identified

areas of the town which are out of walking range of the existing high-quality play areas.

The Study found that the overall quantum of additional open space required for

children’s play equipment provision by redevelopment of brownfield sites in existing

urban area and within the proposed Rushden East Sustainable Urban Extension is not

less than approximately 11 hectares.

S3. All existing open space sites within the town, bar one, are recommended for

safeguarding. The following sites are also recommended candidates for qualitative

improvement:

03. Ascot Road;

08. Campion Close;

11. Deacon Close Park;

12. Fosse Green;

16. Headingley Road;

22. Magnolia Drive;

30. Rose Avenue;

33. Tennyson/ Highfield Road;

35. Trafford Road Park.

S4. Manor Park is not recommended in its entirety to be safeguarded. Rather, the lower-

quality area of the park is recommended for disposal to alternative uses, whilst

significantly more useable sports pitches portion is safeguarded.

5



October 2015

N322/2

S5. There is a shortfall in natural and semi-natural greenspace within the town, with only

two existing sites being identified. Policies to secure appropriate structural landscaping

in new developments; the transformation of urban areas into greenspaces; and the

expansion of existing green corridors within the centre are amongst the

recommendations proposed to ensure the provision of natural and semi-natural

greenspace in Rushden improved. A minimum of approximately 11 hectares of

additional open space will be required to ensure that qualitative provision levels are

sufficient to meet the town’s forecast increased population, including at Rushden East.

S6. The existing provision of allotments within Rushden is currently ‘very good’. In order to

maintain a sufficient level of provision and longevity in their use, it is recommended

that the two existing sites are safeguarded against development or pressure for

alternative uses.

S7. With regard to outdoor sports facilities football, rugby and tennis are identified as

providing the primary facilities in the town. However, the existing provision was found

to be generally deficient, with only one floodlit facility and the general quality of the

facilities in need of improvement. The Study found that the overall quantum of

additional open space required for outdoor sports facilities by redevelopment of

brownfield sites in existing urban area and within the proposed Rushden East

Sustainable Urban Extension is not less than approximately 37.5 hectares.

S8. Local consultation with three local football and rugby clubs identified a need for the

provision of a shared Artificial Turf Pitch (ATP), with the multiple benefits such facilities

can provide. Jubilee Park, Spencer Park or within the proposed Rushden East

Sustainable Urban Extension are all recommended search locations for the siting of

this complementary new facility.

S9. Indoor sports facilities in the town are in need of improvement and upgrading. The

limited amount of quality sports facilities within Rushden will become a greater issue

as the town’s population continues to grow over the next 15 years. Recommendations

are therefore made for the investment and improvement of existing facilities, while

provision is also made for a new indoor sports facility within the forthcoming east

6



October 2015

N322/2

Rushden Urban Extension. Specifically, there is demonstrable demand for a multi-

purpose community facility with capacity for 150 - 200 persons and potential multi-

sporting usage.

7



October 2015

N322/2

1.0 INTRODUCTION

1.1 DLP Planning Ltd was commissioned by Rushden Town Council in May 2015 to

undertake an assessment of open space, recreation and sport facilities in the town of

Rushden, Northamptonshire. The purpose of this Study was to update the open space

provision as outlined in the East Northamptonshire Council ‘Open Space, Sport and

Recreation Study’ (published; January 2006).

1.2 The Rushden Open Space, Recreation and Sport Study has been prepared in

accordance with the existing statutory and policy framework relating to open space. This

is inclusive of the National Planning Policy Framework (“the Framework”), the North

Northamptonshire Spatial Core Strategy (adopted 2008), the recently-submitted

amended North Northamptonshire Joint Core Strategy and other bodies issuing

guidance on open space assessments.

1.3 The purpose of this Study is to identify:

Existing valued sports/recreational facilities to be safeguarded and retained;

Existing poor-quality or underused facilities to be upgraded;

Existing poorly-sited facilities to be replaced elsewhere;

Provision gaps (on a quantitative or qualitative basis) warranting the provision of

new or additional facilities.

1.4 The Study takes into account the proposed Rushden East Sustainable Urban Extension

identified in emerging Development Plan policy as well as existing sites, facilities and

population quantum within the town. This Study may be used to inform any site-specific

allocations or policies within the Neighbourhood Plan.

8



October 2015

N322/2

2.0 METHODOLOGY

2.1 National policy is framed within the Framework that supersedes PPG17 ‘Open Space,

Sport and Recreation’. The PPG17 companion guide ‘Assessing Needs and

Opportunities’ has now been replaced by the National Planning Policy Guidance

(NPPG).

The Framework (adopted March 2012)

2.2 This Study has been produced in accordance with the Framework open space guidance

that is included in paragraphs 73 and 74. It states that open space assessments should

identify;

‘…specific needs and quantitative or qualitative deficits or surpluses of open

space, sports and recreational facilities in the local area. Information gained from

the assessments should be used to determine what open space, sports and

recreational provision is required.’

2.3 The Framework protects existing open space, sports and recreational buildings and

land, including playing fields, should not be built on unless:

An assessment has been undertaken showing that open space, buildings or land

to be surplus to requirements; or

The loss resulting from proposed development would be replaced by equivalent

or better provision in terms of quantity in a suitable location; or

The development is for alternative sports and recreational provision, the needs

for which clearly outweigh the loss.

National Planning Practice Guidance (published March 2014)

2.4 As a result of the Taylor Review (2013) all planning guidance was set out in on easy-to-

navigate website in order to simplify the guidance available to the general public and

professionals.

9



October 2015

N322/2

2.5 This Study uses the published NPPG, particularly the topic ‘open space, green space

and rights of way’ and introduces a new local green space guidance to help community

groups as well as councils to protect green space that is valuable to them,

Fields in Trust (published 2008)

2.6 Fields in Trust published ‘Planning and design for outdoor sport and play’ (2008) which

can be likened to previous recommendations in ‘The Six Acre Standard’. Recommended

quantity, quality and accessibility standards have been prepared by Fields in Trust for

playing pitches, all other outdoor sport as well as outdoor play.

Site Survey (May 2015)

2.7 A Site Survey occurred in May 2015 whereby a series of open space sites were

assessed after prior identification. A total of 39 open space sites were included in the

Site Survey whilst a series of outdoor and indoor sports facilities were also assessed.

The findings of this survey are reported throughout this Study.

10



October 2015

N322/2

3.0 NATIONAL AND LOCAL POLICY CONTEXT

Introduction

3.1 This chapter present and analyses both existing and proposed national and local

planning guidance and policy framework. The guidance and policy provides a framework

within which the planning and management of open space and sports provision can take

place.

National Policy and Guidance

National Planning Policy Framework (“the Framework”)

3.2 In March 2012 the Government adopted a National Planning Policy Framework (“The

Framework”), sweeping away 1,300 pages of Planning Policy Statements and Planning

Policy Guidance Notes.

3.3 The Framework sets out the Government requirements for the planning system only to

the extent that it is relevant, proportionate and necessary to do so. Whilst not

prescriptive, the Framework is however material to the consideration of all planning

proposals. The aim of the Framework is to provide a clear and simple planning

framework which has, at its heart, a “presumption in favour of sustainable development.”

3.4 The most relevant section of the Framework when assessing Rushden’s open space

needs is Section 7 titled ‘Deliver open space, sports and recreational facilities’.

Paragraph 73 states that “access to high quality open spaces and opportunities for sport

and recreation can make an important contribution to the health and well-being of

communities. Planning policies should be based on robust up-to-date assessment of the

needs for open space sport and recreation facilities and opportunities for new provision”.

3.5 The Framework outlines that planning policies should identify specific needs and

quantitative or qualitative deficits or surpluses of open space, sports and recreational

facilities in the local area, while the information gained from this assessment of needs

and opportunities should be used to set locally derived standards for the provision of

open space, sports and recreational facilities.

11



October 2015

N322/2

National Planning Practice Guidance (NPPG)

3.6 The Government published the National Planning Practice Guidance website in August

2013. The planning practice guidance has been approved by the Secretary of State in

March 2014. The guidance provides a topic relating to ‘open space, green space and

rights of way’ which provides guidance on:

Assessing the needs for open space, sports and recreation facilities; a link to the

Sports England website is provided which contains information on

methodologies to assess the need for sport and recreation.

Local green space designation; this is set out to provide special protection

against development for green areas which is important to local communities.

Paragraph 77 of the Framework sets out criteria that the green space must meet

such as the green space being located within close proximity to the community,

is not an extensive parcel of land, is local in character, and is patently special to

the community.

Assessing Needs and Opportunities: A companion guide to PPG17 (ODPM, 2002)

3.7 The companion guide provides useful guidance on how to approach this Study. The

companion guide to PPG17 states the importance for local authorities to carry out their

own open needs assessment as opposed to adopting a national standard. This is framed

by a Five Step guide:

1. Identifying Local Needs – Achieved through Public Engagement

2. Auditing Local Provision – Achieved through Audits

3. Setting Provision Standards – Analysing Audits

4. Applying Provision Standards

5. Drafting Policies

3.8 The companion guide to PPG17 recommends that all open space, irrespective of

ownership, unless privately owned gardens, should be included in an assessment in

order to capture a comprehensive audit of supply of local open space.

The Allotments Acts

3.9 The legal framework for Allotments has been developed over the first half of the 20th

Century. The Acts that form the legal framework are framed accordingly:

12



October 2015

N322/2

Small Holdings and allotments Act 1908 – this Act consolidated all previous

legislation and provided a basis for consequent Acts. This placed a duty on local

authorities to provide sufficient allotments paying regards to demand.

Allotments Act 1922 – specified that they should mostly be used for growing

fruit and vegetables as well as limiting the size of an individual allotment to one

quarter of an acre.

Allotments Act 1925 – required local authorities to recognise the need for

allotments in any town planning development and established statutory

allotments which the local authority could not convert or sell for other uses.

Allotments Act 1950 – improved provisions for compensatory and tenants’

rights. Confined local authorities’ obligation to ‘allotment gardens’ only.

3.10 National Planning Policy does not pay specific regard to allotments. Allotments can,

however, fall within Framework policies relating to enhancing the natural environment

and improving biodiversity, as well as supporting healthy and more self-sufficient

communities.

Advice from National Bodies

Fields Trust – Planning and Design for Outdoor Sport and Play (2008)

3.11 Field in Trust (FIT) is the name of the National Playing Fields Association. Planning and

design for outdoor sport and play (2008) update and modernises previous

recommendations made in the Six Acre Standard. This provides a tool for assisting the

development of local standards. The benchmarks are outlined on the following page:

13



October 2015

N322/2

Benchmarks for Outdoor Play

Quantity – Children’s Playing Space

Table 3.1 – Benchmarks for Children’s Play Provision

Quantity – All Playing Space Benchmark Standard (ha per 1,000)

Designated Equipped Playing Space 0.25

Informal Playing Space 0.55

Children’s Playing Space 0.8

Table 3.1 (Source: Fields In Trust (2008))

Quality – Children’s Playing Space

3.12 The Children’s Play Council’s Quality Assessment Tool allows local authorities to set

their own quality standards. These measures are outlined in the table 3.2 below.

Table 3.2 – Children’s Play Council’s Quality Assessment Tool

Type of Space Distance Criteria (metres)

Walking Distance Straight Line Distance

Local areas for play or

‘door-step’ spaces – for

play and informal

recreation (LAPs)

100

60

Local equipped or local

landscaped, areas for paly

– for play and informal

recreation (LEAPs)

400

240

Neighbourhood equipped

or local landscaped, areas

for play – for play and

informal recreation, and

provision for children and

young people (NEAPs)

1,000

600

Table 3.2 (Source Fields In Trust (2008))

14



October 2015

N322/2

Benchmarks for Outdoor Sport

Quantity – Outdoor Sport

Table 3.3 – Benchmark Standard for Outdoor Sports

Type of Local Authority Benchmark Standard (ha per 1,000)

Urban 1.15

Rural 1.72

Overall 1.2

Table 3.3 (Source: Fields In Trust (2008))

Quality – Outdoor Sport

3.13 FIT recommends the use of Technical Performance Quality Standards such as those

published in Design and Maintenance of Outdoor Sports Facilities (FIT, 2004) for both

pitches and the outdoor facilities, such as cricket, bowls and croquet. Observational

methodologies, such as those within the Sport England’s electronic toolkit, can also

provide a helpful starting point.

Accessibility – Playing Pitches

3.14 Within major residential areas, playing pitches should be provided within 1.2 km of all

dwellings.

Accessibility – Other Outdoor Sports

3.15 Tennis – community tennis courts within 20 minutes travel time (walking in urban areas).

Athletics – one synthetic track with floodlighting per 250,000 people living within 30

minutes’ drive time of the location.

Natural England: ‘Nature Nearby’ – Accessible Natural Greenspace Guidance

(2010)

3.16 The provision of good quality natural green spaces close to where people live is

promoted by Natural England within ‘Nature Nearby’.

15



October 2015

N322/2

3.17 Nature Nearby recommends three different types of standards that should be adopted

by local authorities in order for them to assess and improve the way in which

greenspaces function:

Access to Natural Greenspace Standards – this sets out standards for the size of

a greenspace and distance people are expected to travel from;

Visitor Service Standards – this sets out standards relating to facilities, community

links, accessibility, activities, information and interpretation that are should be

provided depending on the type of greenspace it is;

Greenspace Quality Standard – standards relating to qualitative assessment, such

as cleanliness, sustainability, security and safety amongst other factors.

Local Policy and Guidance

Introduction

3.18 The Local Development Framework (LDF) is made up of a variety of plan documents or

Local Development Documents (LDDs), including documents at a regional, North

Northamptonshire Growth Area and a District Level.

3.19 As part of the development of the LDF, the North Northamptonshire Joint Planning Unit

(JPU) was created. The JPU is a partnership consisting of Corby, Wellingborough,

Kettering and East Northamptonshire councils together with Northamptonshire County

Council who have worked together to create an overall town planning strategy for North

Northamptonshire.

The North Northamptonshire Core Spatial Strategy (2008)

3.20 In June 2008 the North Northamptonshire Core Spatial Strategy was adopted. This Plan

sets out the overall spatial strategy for North Northamptonshire for the period 2001-2021,

including where development should be located, and the standards it should aim to

achieve. The Core Strategy is the framework for the Site Specific Plans (Development

Plan Documents) being prepared by individual Borough/District Councils. The Core

Strategy sets out some key policies that are relevant to this Study.

16



October 2015

N322/2

3.21 Policy 5 ‘Green Infrastructure’ seeks to conserve and enhance green infrastructure in

the area whilst putting an emphasis on the importance of this space to the community.

Policy 5 states;

“A net gain in green infrastructure will be sought through the protection and

enhancement of assets and the creation of new multi functional areas of green

space that promote recreation and tourism, public access, green education,

biodiversity, water management, the protection and enhancement of the local

landscape and historic assets and mitigation of climate change, along with green

economic uses* and sustainable land management.”

3.22 Policy 6 ‘Infrastructure Delivery and Developer Contributions’ sets out the need for new

developments to provide sufficient open space for the new communities. This is

particularly important with the forthcoming East Rushden urban expansion. The Policy

directly references the Supplementary Planning Guidance that is outlined later in this

chapter. Policy 6 states;

“New development will be supported by the timely delivery of infrastructure,

services and facilities necessary to provide balanced, more self-sufficient

communities and to secure a modal shift away from car use and road freight

haulage.”

3.23 Policy 13 ‘General Sustainable Development Principles’ sets out criteria for

developments in order to “meet the needs of residents and businesses without

compromising the ability of future generations to enjoy the same quality of life that the

present generation aspires to.” The most relevant ‘needs’ that a development should

meet, as outlined in Policy 13, follow:

“a) Incorporate flexible designs for buildings and their settings, including access

to amenity space, enabling them to be adapted to future needs and to take into

account the needs of all users;

f) Not lead to the loss of community facilities, unless it can be demonstrated that

they are no longer needed by the community they serve and are not needed for

17



October 2015

N322/2

any other community use, or that the facility is being relocated and improved to

meet the needs of the new and existing community;

g) Not lead to the loss of open space or recreation facilities, unless a site of

equivalent quality and accessibility can be provided, serviced and made

available to the community prior to use of the existing site ceasing;

j) Be designed to promote healthier lifestyles and for people to be active outside

their homes and places of work;

o) Conserve and enhance the landscape character, historic landscape

designated built environmental assets and their settings, and biodiversity of the

environment making reference to the Environmental Character Assessment and

Green Infrastructure Strategy.”

3.24 Policy 16 ‘Sustainable Urban Extensions’ sets out a list of criteria that all urban

extensions should make provision for. Similar to Policy 6 this is particularly relevant to

open space and sports facility provision for the East Rushden urban extension. The most

relevant criterion to this Study is outlined below:

“j) A network of green spaces linking the area to the wider green infrastructure

framework that provides for large-scale landscape enhancement, the

conservation of important environmental assets and natural resources,

biodiversity and formal and informal recreation areas.”

North Northamptonshire Joint Core Strategy 2011-2031

3.25 A replacement Core Strategy was submitted to the Secretary of State for independent

examination in July 2015. The emerging Core Strategy was reviewed to take account of

the recession delaying development and infrastructure investment, and to plan forward

to 2031. The review is also responding to the Government’s reforms to the planning

system, including the National Planning Policy Framework and the revocation of

Regional Plans. Analysis of policies relevant to this Study follow accordingly. It provides

strategic policies to be developed in more detail through Part 2 Local Plans prepared by

Neighbourhood Planning Groups.

18



October 2015

N322/2

3.26 Draft Policy 7 ‘Community Services and Facilities’ sets out requirements for new

developments to support and enhance community services and facilities such as:

“a) Providing on site where necessary or contributing towards accessible, new

or enhanced community services and facilities to meet the needs arising from

the development utilising, where possible, opportunities for the co-location of

facilities or the use of existing suitable sites;

b) Providing accessible greenspace in accordance with Natural England’s

Accessible Natural Greenspace Standards (ANGSt) and the Woodland Trust’s

Woodland Access Standard unless local standards have been adopted;

c) Safeguarding existing facilities unless it can be demonstrated that:

i. They are no longer viable; and

ii. No longer needed by the community they serve; and

iii. Are not needed for any other community use or that the facility is being

relocated and improved to meet the needs of the new and existing

community;

d) Not resulting in a net loss of open space, allotments, sports and recreation

buildings and land, including playing field unless:

i. The facility is surplus to requirements; or

ii. A site of equivalent quality and accessibility can be provided, serviced

and made available to the community prior to use of the existing site ceasing;

or

iii. The development is for alternative sports and recreation provision, the

need for which clearly outweighs the loss.”

3.27 Draft Policy 11 ‘The Network of Urban and Rural Areas’ sets out a simplified settlement

hierarchy based on the Settlement Hierarchy Background paper. As part of the policy,

Rushden joins Corby, Kettering and Wellingborough as a ‘Growth Town’, recognising

local ambitions and the potential of the town to continue to deliver new homes and jobs.

The policy states:

19



October 2015

N322/2

“a) The Growth Towns will be the focus for infrastructure investment and higher

order facilities to support major employment, housing, retail and leisure

development;

c) Provision will be made for new housing as set out in Policy 28. Any proposals

for significant additional growth should be tested and supported through Part 2

Local Plans or Neighbourhood Plans;

d) The Sustainable Urban Extensions shown on the Key Diagram provide

strategic locations for housing and employment development within and beyond

the plan period. If it is necessary to identify additional sites to maintain a 5 year

deliverable supply of housing land in a district in accordance with Policy 28, these

should be identified at the Growth Town followed, if necessary and relevant, the

Market Towns within that district.”

3.28 Draft Policy 15 ‘Well-connected Towns, Villages and Neighbourhoods’ aims to

strengthen the connectivity within and around settlements by managing development

and investment to amongst other requirements:

3.29 Draft Policy 19 ‘The Delivery of Green Infrastructure’ updates the current Core Spatial

Strategy Policy 5 to give clearer emphasis on delivery of Green Infrastructure. The most

relevant parts of the draft policy follow:

“The special mixed urban and rural character of North Northamptonshire will be

maintained and enhanced by:

a) Managing development and investment to secure a net gain in green

infrastructure through:

i. Establishing multi-functional greenspaces within the GI

network;

b) Safeguarding identified sub-regional green infrastructure corridors

by:

i. Not permitting development that compromises their integrity

and therefore that of the overall green infrastructure network;

20



October 2015

N322/2

ii. Using developer contributions to facilitate improvements to

their quality and robustness;

iii. Investing in enhancement and restoration where opportunities

exist.”

3.30 Draft Policy 28 ‘Housing Requirements’ outlines the household growth target between

2011 and 2031 for North Northamptonshire (total 40,000 dwellings) and the East

Northamptonshire District (total 8,400 dwellings).

3.31 Draft Policy 33 ‘Rushden East Sustainable Urban Extension’ outlines the proposed

extension inclusive of the economic, environmental and social impacts. The policy

states:

“Land to the East of Rushden is identified as the broad location for a sustainable

urban extension to include around 2,000-2,500 dwellings and provision for an

appropriate level of job opportunities, ancillary facilities, services and open

space.”

East Northamptonshire Open Space Supplementary Planning Document (2011)

3.32 The East Northamptonshire Open Space SPD sets out East Northamptonshire Council’s

approach to providing open spaces in new developments and to securing financial

contributions to sustain, improve and maintain them. The SPD is a document which

compliments and defines further details of a policy in the Core Spatial Strategy. It was

adopted in November 2011 and follows PMP Consultants Open Space, Sport and

Recreation Study for East Northamptonshire (published January 2006).

3.33 Appendix C sets out the open space principles for East Northamptonshire developments

citing the aspiration for all relevant open spaces to meet the Green Flag status for parks

and other public open spaces. Appendix C summarises why open space is important to

East Northamptonshire;

“Open space within and around a development is as important as the design

of the buildings. Careful consideration of the design of open space should be

integrated at the earliest stage. Open space should not be an after thought

21



October 2015

N322/2

when designing a development. Open space should have purpose and not be

confined to corners of a development or where awkward pieces of land are left

over which are not suitable for development. Poor design encourages crime,

lack of social inclusion, creates littering and dog fouling potential. Well designed

open space can be the making of a place.”

3.34 Children’s Play Spaces is highlighted within the Appendix C as it guides applicants to

the ten CABE principles on designing children’s play space as set out below:

Imagine a play space designed to enhance its setting

Imagine a play space in the best possible place

Imagine a play space close to nature

Imagine a play space where children can play in different ways

Imagine a play space where disabled and non-disabled children play together

Imagine a place space loved by the community

Imagine a play space where children of all aged play together

Imagine a play space where children can stretch and challenge themselves in

every way

Imagine a play space maintained for play value and environmental

sustainability

Imagine a play space that evolves as the children grow

22



October 2015

N322/2

4.0 ASSESSMENT OF OPEN SPACE NEEDS

Introduction

4.1 This chapter presents an assessment of local open space needs and priorities. There

are a number of objective indicators that can be used when assessing open space needs

within Rushden. For the purpose of this Study population has been used as the sole

indicator as it gives a general overview of the density within the area. The population

data was gained from the 2011 census extracting from Lower Super Output Area (LSOA)

Levels which are often referred to as Wards. Maps displaying each Ward in turn are

located in Appendix A whilst the names of each follow for ease:

Rushden Bates

Rushden Hayden

Rushden Spencer

Rushden Pemberton

Rushden Sartoris

Existing population

4.2 The population of each ward (LSOA) is compared against the population of: the non-

metropolitan district, East Northamptonshire; the region, East Midlands; and the national

average, England.

Table 4.1 – Rushden Ward’s Population Density 2011

Population (Persons)

Ward Name Ward (LSOA)

East Northamptonshire

East Midlands

England

Bates 4,514

86,765

4,533,222

53,012,456 Hayden 7,382

Spencer 6,222

Pemberton 6,807

Sartoris 4,347

Table 4.1 (Source: Office for National Statistics (2013))

4.3 The most recently-recorded total population of Rushden, excluding Higham Ferrers, is

29,272 persons.

23



October 2015

N322/2

Population density

4.4 The population density of each ward is outlined in Table 4.2 below. Pemberton and

Sartoris to the south west of Rushden are the most densely populated wards, whilst

Bates, covering a vast amount of open land to the south is the least densely populated.

In comparison to the local authority, region and nation Rushden is an urban area where

the demand on open space, recreational and sports facilities will be higher than the

average.

Table 4.2 – Rushden Ward’s Population Density 2011

Density Rate (Number of Persons per Hectare) (Persons)

Ward Name Ward (LSOA)

East Northamptonshire

East Midlands

England

Bates 9.8

1.7

2.9

4.1 Hayden 16.8

Spencer 14.8

Pemberton 58.4

Sartoris 39.4

Table 4.2 (Source: Office for National Statistics (2013))

Population forecast

4.5 The population forecast is important to the Study of open space, recreation and sports

facilities. With this forecast data it allows the provision of open space and facilities to be

compared against future demand.

4.6 The population forecast has derived from the Emerging North Northamptonshire Joint

Core Strategy as outlined in Figure 1 below. The Emerging North Northamptonshire JCS

states:

“This Plan is based on projections prepared by the Cambridgeshire Centre for

Housing and Planning Research (CCHPR) using previous ONS Interim 2011-

based projections adjusted and rolled forward to 2031. In summary, these project

a North Northamptonshire population of 328,300 in 2031, representing a 20.2%

increase over the plan period 2011-2031 (or, for comparison with the latest ONS

projections, 19.5% since 2012).”

24



October 2015

N322/2

Figure 1: Projected percentage growth in population 2012-31 (North Northamptonshire JCS)

4.7 The Emerging North Northamptonshire JCS states that the “North Northamptonshire

Housing Market Area (HMA) has accommodated significant new housing in the past, in

part due to the policy driven growth agenda promoted through the former Milton Keynes

and South Midlands Sub-Regional Strategy… The vision is for the area to maintain this

momentum of growth, with well managed sustainable development delivered, in large

part, through Sustainable Urban Extensions at the main towns.”

4.8 The Emerging JCS has assumed that around 3% of the dwelling stock is vacant at any

point in time to conclude that the adjusted household projections give rise to a need for

34,900 net additional homes in the (HMA) over the period 2011-2031, which has been

rounded up to a plan requirement of 35,000 dwellings. Draft Policy 28 ‘Housing

Requirements’ of the Emerging JCS states that the East Northamptonshire annual

average dwellings between 2011 and 2031 is 420 units whilst the total between the same

time period is 8,400 units.

4.9 For the purpose of this Study, the forecast population of Rushden is derived by using

the following equation:

25



October 2015

N322/2

Forecast population of Rushden (persons) = (Current households (dwellings) +

Forecast growth of households (dwellings)) X 2.3

4.10 The current households, as outlined in the Rushden Housing Needs and Mix

Requirements Assessment (June 2014), is 12,961 dwellings as per the 2011 Census.

The forecast growth of households is the sum of the infill and Rushden East, 2,731

and 2,250 dwellings respectively, totalling 4,981 dwellings. Therefore, the forecast

equation for the forecast population of Rushden follows;

Forecast population of Rushden = (Current households (dwellings) + Forecast growth of

households (dwellings)) X 2.3

= (12,961 dwellings + 4,981 dwellings) X 2.3

= (17,942 dwellings) X 2.3

= 41,267 persons

4.11 The total forecast population of Rushden following development, primarily to the east of

the town and infill, in 2031 equals 41,267 persons.

26



October 2015

N322/2

5.0 ASSESSMENT OF RECREATIONAL OPEN SPACE

Introduction

5.1 Open space is a key provision in enabling children’s play needs. It is widely

acknowledged that children’s play has many benefits past physical activity. A Site

Survey was conducted in May 2015 whereby each open space was assessed on a

qualitative and quantitative basis. Within this chapter a series of different open space

typologies are assessed, including:

Children’s Play Provision

Natural and Semi-Natural Greenspace

Allotment Needs

Children’s Play Provision

5.2 At present there are no adopted national standards relating to children’s play provision.

However, the Field’s In Trust has developed a structured approach to the planning and

provision of children’s play areas, as outlined in planning and design for outdoor sport

and play (2008). The approach was outlined in Chapter 3, Tables 3.1 and 3.2.

5.3 East Northamptonshire Open Space Supplementary Planning Document sets out a

recommended local standards for provision for children and young people. The quantity

is set at 0.1 ha per 1,000 population whilst the accessibility is set at a 10 minute walk or

480m in distance whilst a qualitative measure is set out in Appendix F, as outlined in

Chapter 3 paragraph 3.27. The ten CABE principles to designing children’s play

provision are also utilised when assessing children’s play provision.

Existing Children’s Play Provision

5.4 As part of the site survey (May 2015) an assessment of the children’s play provision as

part recorded the quality and quantity of facilities across Rushden. Appendix B provides

an audit of all the parks and open space sites in Rushden. Within this audit are a series

of LAP’s, LEAP’s and NEAP’s as defined by NPFA standards accordingly:

Neighbourhood Equipped Area of Play (NEAP): 1,000m2

27



October 2015

N322/2

Local Equipped Area of Play (LEAP): 400m2

Local Area of Play (LAP): 100m2

5.5 Out of a total 39 open spaces (which did not include school sites) assessed in 2015, 24

contained some form of formal children’s play provision (LAP, LEAP or NEAP).

Quantity

5.6 The audit has been based on the site area as opposed to the quantity of play areas and

therefore a local standard has been set in terms of hectares per 1000 persons.

5.7 The site survey demonstrates that, out of the 39 sites surveyed, under one quarter

currently provide a LAP, whilst over one quarter provided a LEAP. NEAPs are less

frequent as just over one tenth of the sites possessed one. No formal children’s play

equipment was found at over one third of the sites surveyed. This data is presented in

table 5.1 below.

Table 5.1 – Children’s Play Provision by Type within Rushden

Type of Children’s Play Provision (excluding Schools)

Number of Open Spaces

% of Total Open Spaces

LAP 9 23.1%

LEAP 11 28.2%

NEAP 4 10.3%

No formal Children’s Play

Provision

15 38.4%

Total 39 100%

Table 5.1 (Source: Site Survey (May, 2015))

5.8 The sites identified were assessed as either LAPs, LEAPs, NEAPs or no formal

children’s play provision. A number of the sites could be upgraded from their current

classification with the installation of further play equipment. For instance, in areas of

qualitative deficiency, LEAPs could be upgraded to NEAPs which would increase the

provision for older children.

28



October 2015

N322/2

5.9 Table 5.2 identifies the level of informal and formal play provision compared with the

population for each ward using data from the 2011 census as outlined in Chapter 4.

Formal children’s play provision comes is identified above whilst the informal areas are

open spaces suitable for informal play activities, such as flying a kite or space for

running. The most appropriate example of informal children’s play provision is a park.

Table 5.2 – Amount of Children’s Play Space per Population by Ward

Ward Children’s

Formal and

Informal Play

Provision (m2)

Population

(2011)

(persons)

Play Space Per

Population (m2)

National

Benchmark for

Play Space Per

Population (m2)

Bates 121,252 4,514 26.9

10

Hayden 30,389 7,382 4.1

Spencer 78,486 6,222 12.6

Pemberton 13,865 6,807 2.0

Sartoris 57,186 4,347 13.2

Total 301,178 29,272 58.8 --

Average 60,236 5,854 11.8 --

Table 5.2 (Source: Site Survey (2015) and Census data (2011))

5.10 Table 5.2 shows that the provision of formal and informal play provision for children is

highest in the Bates ward at 26.9m2 per person. Pemberton and Hayden have the lowest

provision of open space for children’s play provision at 2.0m2 and 4.1m2 per child

respectively, falling below the national benchmark and therefore being in most need of

quality facilities to offset the identified quantitative shortfall.

5.11 In 2008 that national benchmark for children’s play equipment provision was set at 10m2

per person as per the Mayor of London’s Providing for children and young people’s play

and informal recreation Supplementary Planning Guidance. When comparing each ward

in turn against this figure it is clear that the wards of Pemberton and Hayden suffer from

a significant under provision with 2m2 and 4.1m2 of play space per person respectively.

The wards of Spencer and Sartoris meet the benchmark at 12.6m2 and 13.2m2 of play

29



October 2015

N322/2

space per person respectively, with Bates ward demonstrating a substantial over

provision at 26.9m2 of play space per head of population.

5.12 Table 5.3 uses the population forecast as outlined in the previous Chapter to analyse

the current supply of informal and formal children’s play provision against future

demands. Comparing the current provision to future demands it is clear that, should

significant development occur within and surrounding Rushden, the demand on open

space provision will increase by a third.

Table 5.3 – Children’s Play Provision and Population of Rushden in 2031

Children’s Formal and

Informal Play Provision

within Rushden (m2)

Forecast Population

(2031) (persons)

Play Space Per

Population (m2)

Forecast

(2031)

(persons)

301,178

41,267

7.3

Table 5.3 (Source: Site Survey (2015) and Consultants Forecast (2015))

Accordingly, the overall quantum of additional open space required by redevelopment

of brownfield sites in the existing urban area and within the proposed Rushden East

Sustainable Urban Extension is not less than 111,472m2 (approximately 11 hectares).

Quality

5.13 The condition of each children’s play area in Rushden was scored on a set of criteria as

set out in Chapter 3 based on the “Green Flag” criteria for quality:

Type and range of play equipment

Cleanliness

Seating

Hard playing surface

Security

30



October 2015

N322/2

5.14 As part of the site survey (2015) each children’s formal play provision area was assessed

using the criteria listed above. As a result of the survey each site was categorised into

either ‘good’ quality, ‘fair’ quality or ‘poor’ quality. Table 5.4 displays the outcome of the

assessment whilst Appendix D displays each site’s individual assessment.

Table 5.4 – Quality of Children’s Play Provision in Rushden

Quality of Children’s

Play Provision

Number of Sites % of Total Children’s

play areas

Poor 0 0

Fair 7 30

Good 16 70

Total 23 100

Table 5.4 (Source: Site Survey (2015))

Natural and Semi-Natural Greenspace

5.15 This type of open space includes woodlands, urban forestry, scrubland, grasslands,

wetlands, nature reserves and wastelands with a primary purpose of wildlife

conservation and bio-diversity within the settlement boundaries.

5.16 Accessible Natural Greenspace Standard (ANGS) are recommended to local authorities

by Natural England when assessing the provision of natural and semi-natural

greenspace. The guidance was issued within A Space for Nature (1996) which

recommended the following:

That no person should be located more than 300m from the nearest area of

natural greenspace of at least 2 hectares in size;

Provision of at least 1 hectare of Local Nature Reserve per 1,000 population;

That there should be at least one accessible 20 hectare site within 2 kilometres

from home;

That there should be one accessible 100 hectare site within 5 kilometres; and

That there should be one accessible 500 hectare site within 10 kilometres.

31



October 2015

N322/2

5.17 The standards were reviewed within the by Natural England in Accessible Guidance

Standards in Towns and Cities: A Review and Toolkit (2003). The review concluded that

the standards would not be altered.

5.18 East Northamptonshire Council have also set a recommended local standard of 1.3

hectares of natural and semi-natural open space per 1000 population in an urban area.

5.19 Although Rushden is surrounded by greenspace, and has good access to the Nene

Valley Park, it is lacking in the urban centres and connectivity is in need of further

improvement. There were two prominent sites identified as being natural or semi-natural

greenspace within the boundaries of Rushden: East Northamptonshire Greenway; and

Mallards. Both can be considered natural despite the urban fabric surrounding them.

The East Northamptonshire Greenway provides a link through the centre of the town for

people to walk or cycle through a green environment, whilst Mallards provides fishing

ponds and natural vegetation that is maintained for public use. In the absence of any

opportunity to materially increase the quantum of nature greenspace within the existing

urban area, enhanced links are recommended to existing nearby structural greenspace

areas.

Allotment Provision

5.20 This section reviews the extent to which the provision of allotments within Rushden

meets national and local standards in the present day and at the end of the North

Northamptonshire Core Strategy in 2031.

5.21 Allotments provide an opportunity for people to grow their own produce as part of the

long-term promotion of sustainability, health and social inclusion. In recent years,

demand for allotments has increased due to a number of reasons. The benefits of

maintaining an allotment are widely publicised, hence the recent surge in interest. These

benefits include:

Providing recreation

Improving physical and mental health

Providing a vital part of greenspace within urban areas

32



October 2015

N322/2

5.22 The Framework states that when a local planning authority prepares its development

plan, they should undertake an assessment of the likely demand for open spaces as

well as plan positively for the creation, enhancement and management of biodiversity

and green infrastructure.

5.23 There is no formal guidance on how allotment needs should be assessed, however, the

Local Government Association good practice guide ‘Growing in the Community’ (2001)

identifies issues which should be considered when doing so. As outlined in Chapter 3,

there are a number of Allotments Acts which define law on the subject. Section 23 of the

1908 Allotments Act (as amended) binds Local Authorities to providing allotments for

the local community should there be a demand.

5.24 The most recent guidance on the current level of provision was published in 1996 by the

National Allotment survey. This identified an average provision in England of 15 plots

per 1,000 households.

5.25 The most recent Open Space, Sport and Recreation Study for East Northamptonshire

Council (2006) produced by PMP stated a recommended local standard for East

Northamptonshire is 0.34ha per 1000 persons, a standard from which no departure has

been identified or justified.

Quantity

5.26 There are four allotment sites within Rushden located to the north, south, east and west

of the urban area:

Site 1 - Church Hall Road Allotments (4ha)

Site 2 - Rushden Permanent Allotments & Small Holdings Society, Quorn Road

(5ha)

Site 3 – Bedford Road Allotments (1.6ha)

Site 4 – Alexandra Road Allotments (3.5ha)

5.27 The current provision of allotments in Rushden is 0.48ha per 1000 persons within

Rushden as per the population from the most recent census (2011). This is more than

33



October 2015

N322/2

the East Northamptonshire benchmark of 0.34ha per 1000 persons which is a good

provision considering the urban context of Rushden.

5.28 Table 5.5 outlines that the current provision of allotments will fall following an increase

in population up until 2031. The current high provision will be diminished unless further

provision is catered for in new development areas, particularly the Rushden East Urban

Extension. Although a provision of 0.34ha per 1000 persons is considered good.

Table 5.5 – Allotment Provision in Rushden in 2031

Allotment Site Size (hectares) Allotments per 1000 persons

(Forecast) (2031)

Site 1 4 0.097

Site 2 5 0.121

Site 3 1.6 0.039

Site 4 3.5 0.085

Total 14.1 0.34


Quality

5.29 There are no national or local standards when assessing the quality of allotments. During

the Site Survey (2015) the four allotments were assessed for a number of criteria

including:

Vegetation

Safety and security

Ancillary accommodation

Cleanliness and maintenance

Accessibility

5.30 The four sites scored well in all categories for a range of reasons. All have gates and

secure fences around their perimeter to restrict anti-social behaviour. The sites are

currently well maintained with waste bins available on site. The pitches appeared to be

in full occupation. In terms of accessibility, the existing allotments are well located in

34



October 2015

N322/2

spatial terms with appropriate ease of access by car, public transport or walking.

Consequently, the existing allotments are all identified for safeguarding.

Summary of recommendations

5.31 The assessment of recreational open space within Rushden found that the current level

of children’s play provision is fair, however, there is scope to increase the quality of this

in some areas. One of the areas to improve upon, accessibility, is exemplified in

Appendix F where the areas excluded from the buffer zones are out of walking range of

the respective play areas as per the NPFA standards. The demand for these play areas

will increase ever more as Rushden is a Growth Town. Any future development should

include LEAPs and NEAPs to cater for the junior and older children. In regard to the

quantum of additional open space required for children’s play equipment provision by

redevelopment of brownfield sites in existing urban area and within the proposed

Rushden East Sustainable Urban Extension is not less than approximately 11 hectares.

5.32 Other recommendations include the production of an Action Plan by Rushden Town

Council that seeks the enhancement of current play areas as well as aim to identify

additional playspace provision opportunities in urban renewal locations. Setting up a

task force to capitalise on funding that is available for such development will help to

finance any future projects. Community ownership, particularly in any new development,

will help to maintain interest in the upkeep of any play area.

5.33 The Study also found that there is a lack of natural and semi-natural greenspace within

the urban area, and a need for improved linkages to existing nearby structural open

space facilities. Additionally, appropriate structural landscaping in new development

(particularly Rushden East), transformation of urban areas into greenspaces, and

expansion where possible of existing green corridors are also recommended.

5.34 The current provision of allotments is good and the provision of four sites within Rushden

should be safeguarded. Therefore in order to preserve the facility, if an allotment is

developed it is suggested that an alternative suitably located allotment, of equal or

greater size, and of equal or superior quality is provided.

35



October 2015

N322/2

6.0 ASSESSMENT OF OUTDOOR SPORT 6.1 This chapter reviews the quantum and quality of outdoor sport provision in the town.

Overall Pitch Provision

6.2 Provision for a range of sport pitches currently exists within Rushden, spread across a

total of 19 pitches. The provision for football outweighs the provision for other sports.

Analysis of the data obtained from the site survey (2015) revealed that there are a total

of 5 (full size) football pitches, 4 (full size) rugby pitches, 4 (full size) tennis courts, 3 (full

size) rounders pitches and 1 (full size) softball pitch, whilst there is 1 (junior) football

pitch. Table 6.1 outlines the type and use of pitches identified.

Table 6.1 – Overall Pitch Provision in Rushden

Pitch Type Grass Hard Surface Total Total Area (m2)

Cricket (full size)

1 0 1 12,920

Football (full size)

5 0 5 32,200

Football (junior) 1 0 1 3,340

Rugby (full size) 4 0 4 28,000

Rounders 3 0 3 18,000

Softball 1 0 1 6,000

Tennis 0 4 4 2,675

Total 15 4 19 100,135


Local Outdoor Sports Clubs

6.3 A catalogue of the sports clubs that use these facilities is outlined below:

Cricket Clubs

Rushden Town Cricket Club

Football Clubs

AFC Rushden & Diamonds Football Club

36



October 2015

N322/2

Rushden & Higham United Football Club

Rushden Windmill Football Club

South Rushden Youth Football Club

Rushden & Higham United Youth Football Club

Golf Clubs

John White Golf Club (Par 3 Golf Course)

Rugby Clubs

Rushden & Higham RFC

(Rushden Town Bowling Club is considered later in this Report, in Section 7).

Quantity

6.4 Table 6.2 provides a comparator of the number of people in Rushden per pitch sport.

The data provided shows that the provision of full size football and rugby pitches within

Rushden is similar to the national average, whereas the provision of cricket pitches is

somewhat lower than the national average.

Table 6.2 – Outdoor Pitches per Person in Rushden and England

Sport Total Pitches

in Rushden

Rushden

Pitches /

Person (2011)

Total Pitches in

England

England Pitches

/ Person

Cricket

(full size)

1 1:29,272 23,980 1:2,211

Football

(full size)

5 1:5,854 8,908 1:5,951

Rugby

(full size)

4 1:7,318 7,054 1:7,515

Table 6.2 (Source: Site Survey and Sport England (2015))

6.5 Table 6.3 compares the forecast population for Rushden up until 2031, as outlined in

Chapter 4, against the current provision of outdoor sports pitches. This data shows that

37



October 2015

N322/2

the pitch demand will increase considerably in the forthcoming Plan period, notably due

to significant population growth at Rushden East.

Table 6.3 – Outdoor Pitches per Person using Forecast Population Data

Sport Total Pitches in

Rushden

Rushden Pitches / Persons

(Forecast) (2031)

Cricket (full size) 1 1:41,267

Football (full size) 5 1:8,253

Rugby (full size) 4 1:10,317

Table 6.3 (Source: Site Survey, Sport England and Consultant Forecast (2015))

6.6 As outlined in Chapter 3, the Fields in Trust set a benchmark of 1.15ha of outdoor sports

provision per 1000 persons in an urban area. Although this benchmark has not been

adopted by East Northamptonshire Council, it is useful to compare the current provision

of outdoor facilities against a basic national benchmark. There is currently 10.1ha of

provision in Rushden which equates to 0.35ha per 1000 persons in Rushden, one third

of the benchmark as set out by the Fields in Trust. Accordingly, the overall quantum of

additional open space required by redevelopment of brownfield sites in the existing

urban area and within the proposed Rushden East Sustainable Urban Extension is not

less than 373,500m2 (approximately 37.5 hectares).

Quality

6.7 As part of the Site Survey (2015) the quality of the outdoor sport provision was assessed

against a number of indicators as outlined below:

Access

Type of Facilities

Floodlights

6.8 Existing facilities currently differ in quality as follows:

38



October 2015

N322/2

Table 6.4 – Rushden’s Outdoor Sports Provision for Floodlit and Enclosed Pitches

Pitch Type Floodlit Enclosed

Cricket (full size) 0 0

Football (full size) 1 2

Football (junior) 0 0

Rugby (full size) 0 2

Rounders 0 0

Softball 0 0

Tennis 0 0

Total 1 4

Table 6.4: (Source: Site Visit (2015))

6.9 Although one full-size football pitch is floodlit, the provision for the whole of Rushden is

poor as no other facility benefits from this. This has negative effects, principally by

restricting playing time, especially in winter months. There are more enclosed pitches,

however, demonstrating a higher security and standard of these. In terms of access,

existing facilities are predominately located in public parks as well as well-known sports

clubs.

Local Sports Club Consultation

6.10 As part of the Study three local sports clubs were consulted to identify their current

capacity in regard to facilities and membership as well as their needs in the future. The

clubs consulted include: AFC Rushden & Diamonds Football Club; Rushden Town

Cricket Club; and Rushden & Higham Rugby Club. A summary of the consultation

follows.

AFC Rushden & Diamonds Football Club

6.11 AFC Rushden & Diamonds have a membership of 750 persons expanding over 15

teams at both junior and senior level. At present the 1st team play in Wellingborough with

only two of the teams playing within the urban conurbation of Rushden, Higham or

Irthlingborough at South End School in Rushden. One key aim for the football club is for

their 1st team to play within the local area as opposed to Wellingborough which they are

keen to explore any opportunity to secure this.

39



October 2015

N322/2

6.12 One basic need as a club is for a 1st team pitch with surrounding facilities which will not

limit the level at which the team will rise. A second basic need is for the provision of

facilities where at least some, preferably for all, junior teams to play. The provision of a

Artificial Turf Pitch (ATF) would go some way to helping secure this as it can be used in

most weather conditions and is often aided by artificial lighting. The club admitted that

the requirement of approximately a 20 acre site to house all the football teams is

unfeasible, therefore, they are willing to share facilities with other local sports clubs.

Moreover the club mentioned that they actively encourage this.

Rushden Town Cricket Club

6.13 Rushden Town Cricket Club provided a ‘wish list’ for any future provision of sports

facilities. This list was very similar to the clubs current playing facilities which they are

unable to share with other sports clubs and also provided with the caveat that these

facilities are required should their current sports facilities be allocated for a different use.

The list was inclusive of: 1st/2nd team pitch approximately 5.55 acres measuring 150m x

150m; a 3rd/4th team pitch of the same size; 12 wickets on 1st/2nd team square; 10 wickets

on 3rd/4th team square; an artificial wicket on 3rd/4th team square; 2 practice nets

approximately 45m by 10m; a car park for approximately 75 cars; a pavilion with an area

of 400m2; an equipment/machine store; and 2 score boards.

Rushden & Higham Rugby Club

6.14 Rushden & Higham Rugby Club currently has access to four full-sized rugby pitches at

Manor Park and Jubilee Park as part of a lease agreement with the local Council. The

club’s current facilities include: two full-size pitches at Manor Park; two full-size pitches

at Jubilee Park also benefiting from some car parking; a club house inclusive fo changing

room and bathroom facilities which has recently been upgraded. The club currently

benefits from approximately 265 members within the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, Colts, and junior teams.

At present the teams have to travel to Sharbrook, Bedfordshire to use 4G facilities whilst

the four pitches are at full capacity all season.

6.15 The forecast demand for future facilities is for a minimum of four pitches, provision of

facilities for the current membership, further car parking, and a club house which will

ideally be upgraded further. The club would be keen to utilise any all-weather facilities

40



October 2015

N322/2

particularly for training and would be happy to share facilities with other sports clubs

should this not be detrimental to their own function.

Recommendations

6.16 Football, rugby and tennis provide the majority of the provision of outdoor sports within

Rushden. The quality of these and other facilities is generally in need of improvement,

however. One way of alleviating this issue is by introducing Artificial Turf Pitches (ATF)

as outlined by the consultation responses of local sports clubs. Currently Rushden does

not benefit from an ATF, the provision of which would bring multiple benefits to the local

community. An ATF can be used for multiple sports as well as usually providing

floodlights to enable longer playing hours. Consideration should be given to requiring

such a facility within the Rushden East Sustainable Urban Extension, provided by the

developer; at Jubilee Park (funded in whole or in part through developer contributions);

at Spencer Park (funded in whole or in part through developer contributions); or at the

Rushden Academy (formerly Rushden College) for community use (again, funded in

whole or in part through developer contributions).

6.17 Existing outdoor sports facilities should be safeguarded, in order to maintain an

appropriate quantum of facilities to support the town’s forecast population growth.

Moreover the Study found that the overall quantum of additional open space required

for outdoor sports facilities by redevelopment of brownfield sites in existing urban area

and within the proposed Rushden East Sustainable Urban Extension is not less than

approximately 37.5 hectares.

41



October 2015

N322/2

7.0 ASSESSMENT OF INDOOR SPORT

7.1 This chapter uses Sport England’s Active Places Power (APP) strategic planning tools

in order to identify the current provision of indoor sports facilities within Rushden. The

APP website provides a database of all indoor sports facilities within England, including

all such facilities within Rushden.

7.2 The type of indoor sport provision within Rushden that was assessed as part of this

Study includes:

Sport halls

A swimming pool

Health and fitness suites

Indoor bowls club

Local Indoor Sports Clubs

7.3 A catalogue of sports clubs that use these facilities is outlined below:

Bowls Clubs

Rushden Town Bowling Club

Swimming Clubs

Rushden Swimming Club

Wellingborough Swimming Club

Table Tennis Club

Higham Harriers Table Tennis Club

Roller Hockey Club

Rushden Inline Roller Hockey Club

42



October 2015

N322/2

Quantity

7.4 Table 7.1 displays the amount of pitches in comparison the current population and the

two forecast populations for 2031. There are no national standards to compare the

results against. Despite this, paragraph 7.8, explores the significance of this data.

Table 7.1 – Rushden’s Indoor Sports Provision and its Population

Type of

facility

Total Number

in Rushden

Rushden Provision /

Person (2013)

Forecast Population

(2031) (persons)

Health &

Fitness

Suites

3 1:9,757 1:13,756

Indoor Bowls

Clubs

1 1:29,272 1:41,267

Sports Halls 4 1:7,318 1:10,317

Swimming

Pools

1 1:29,272 1:41,267

Table 7.1 (Source: Site Survey, Census Data and Consultant Forecast (2015))

Quality

7.5 The indoors sports facilities as outlined in tables 7.1 and 7.2 all differ from one another.

Through the Site Survey (2015) and Sport England APP the quality of the provision of

indoor sports facilities can be assessed.

Table 7.2 – Indoor Sport Provision in Rushden

Site Name Ownership Access Size (m2) Equivalent

Courts /

Pools

The Rushden Academy School Private 459 3

Pemberton Leisure &

Conference Centre

ENC Pay and Play 594 4

Heritage Chapel &

Halls

Sports Club Sports Club /

Community

Association

Unknown Unknown

43



October 2015

N322/2

South End Junior

School

Community

School

Private Unknown Unknown

Splash Leisure Pool ENC Pay and Play 521 4

Rushden Town Indoor

Bowls Club

Sports Club Sports Club /

Community

Association

972 6

Elite Personal Training Health &

Fitness Suite

Pay and Play Unknown Unknown

Fit 4 Her Health &

Fitness Suite

Pay and Play Unknown Unknown

Little Street Fitness

Centre

Health &

Fitness Suite

Unknown Unknown Unknown

Table 7.2 (Source: Site Survey and Sport England (2015))

7.6 The quality of a facility is based on a number of criteria including:

Access

Size

Standard of facility

7.7 As a result of the survey each site was categorised into either ‘good’ quality, ‘fair’ quality

or ‘poor’ quality. Table 7.3 displays the outcome of the assessment with only Splash

Swimming Pool and Pemberton Leisure & Conference Centre being categorised within

the ‘good’ bracket. This was due to the range and quality of facilities available, coupled

with the ease of access to the general public. The remainder of the sites were

categorised within the ‘fair’ bracket with a lack of access to the general public and range

of facilities restricting a higher rating. This is not to say that any aspiration to update or

augment these two “good” facilities would not be beneficial but rather, that as a minimum

they should be safeguarded.

44



October 2015

N322/2

Table 7.3 – Quality of Indoor Sports Provision within Rushden

Quality of Indoor Sport

Facilities

Number of Sites % of Total Indoor Sports

Provision

Poor 0 0

Fair 5 71

Good 2 29

Total 7 100


Recommendations

7.8 In light of the Site Survey (2015) and the above quantitative and qualitative data it is

apparent that in the future the provision of indoor sports facilities will become an issue.

Due to the increasing population over the next 15 years the use of land to provide these

facilities will have to be carefully thought about due to the increasing demand for the

housing. The use of some of the sites where indoor sports facilities are situated should

be evaluated against their value to the community.

7.9 The provision of indoor sports facilities in Rushden differs dependent on the

requirements of the leisure or sports activity. For instance there is one swimming pool

compared to four sports halls. This provision will become comparatively scarcer as the

population grows.

7.10 Splash Swimming Pool and Pemberton Leisure & Conference Centre should be

safeguarded as a minimum. There is potential to renovate, upgrade, refurbish or replace

either facility. Splash Swimming Pool has been flooded twice in the past making the town

centre siting almost unviable. There will undoubtedly be increased pressure on these

two key indoor facilities as Rushden’s forecast population significantly increases and

accordingly, developer contributions should be sought for their upgrading and

improvement.

45



October 2015

N322/2

7.11 There is no cinema or theatre in the town, whose existing and forecast population levels

will remain significantly below the levels required to make such facilities self-supporting

and financially viable. Flexible use spaces, convertible for seasonal theatrical usage,

should be look upon favourably.

7.12 The approved Rushden Lakes development to the north of the A45 will create around

400,000 sq ft of new retail and restaurant accommodation, including a lake which will be

“made available” for activities involving non-motorised boats like sailing and kayaking,

and a series of restaurants and a visitor centre looking out over the water. This private

facility will increase the breadth of choice available to Rushden residents but will also

serve a wider sub-regional role, reflected in its scale. The development already has

planning permission and is included in this report as it is of a notable scale, rather than

for any safeguarding or similar purpose.

46



October 2015

N322/2

8.0 CONCLUSIONS

8.1 The current level of provision of open space, recreation and sports facilities within

Rushden differs depending on the type of provision. The following chapter aims to draw

conclusions on a ward-by-ward basis and a sport-by-sport basis where appropriate.

Firstly, a general set of conclusions are drawn upon before more detailed analysis

including individual site analysis.

Recreational Open Space

8.2 The results of the Site Survey (2015) found that the quality of the provision for children’s

play areas was fairly high as most sites were clean, well maintained and accessible to

large amounts of the public. However, some areas of Rushden have a poor supply of

play areas, particularly in the Hayden and Pemberton wards and as outlined in chapter

5 and the buffer zone plan in Appendix F. The recommendations advised that with future

development to the east there will need to be a further increase in the provision of this

typology in both wards and in the Rushden East Sustainable Urban Extension to

maintain a sufficient supply. This is supported as the Study found that the overall

quantum of additional open space required for children’s play equipment provision by


Rushden East Sustainable Urban Extension is not less than 11 hectares. This is

particularly prevalent in the wards of Hayden and Pemberton where there is a need for

extra provision due to their deficits.

8.3 There is an absence of natural and semi-natural greenspace which can be alleviated by

including appropriate structural landscaping within new developments (notably at

Rushden East) and encouraging greenways to link up additional parts of the town. This

contrasts with the quantitative provision of allotments which currently exceeds local

standards by some way. The four sites identified are of good quality and in full use, so

that should consequently be safeguarded.

Outdoor Sport

8.4 The quantity, quality and accessibility relating to outdoor sports provision was of some

concern. The Study found that the overall quantum of additional open space required by

47



October 2015

N322/2


Rushden East Sustainable Urban Extension is not less than 37.5 hectares. Additional

provision of at least one Artificial Turf Pitch will improve facilities and lengthen playing

hours, with other existing facilities being safeguarded. This is supported by the

consultation responses of existing sports clubs who all cite a need for this type of facility.

The Rushden East Sustainable Urban Extension, Jubilee Park, or Spencer Park are all

appropriate candidates for the provision of this new facility.

8.5 Another concern that was highlighted through consultation was the requirement for

further facilities within the town for all outdoor clubs, particularly rugby and football. One

such example is AFC Rushden & Diamonds Football Club who, with 750 members,

currently have to use facilities outside of the urban conurbation. The growing population

also means that further provision will have to be made in the future. This increase in

demand will further limit the opportunities for future members as the current provision is

insufficient. The proposed Rushden East Sustainable Urban Extension should

accommodate the required new provision, there being significant limitations to its

provision within the existing urban area.

Indoor Sport

8.6 The provision of indoor sport has scope for improvement as the accessibility and range

of facilities on offer would benefit from improvement. The current provision includes

facilities for bowls, swimming, roller hockey, sports hall, table tennis and a series of

health and fitness suites. Demand for these types of facilities will outgrow the finite

current provision, particularly due to forecast population growth at Rushden East.

Consequently, developer contributions should be sought for capacity and quality

improvements at the Splash Swimming Pool and/or Pemberton Leisure & Conference

Centre.

Ward-by-Ward Open Space Analysis

Bates

8.7 The Bates ward, with one of the smallest populations, has the greatest provision of

children’s play equipment and open space out of the five wards in Rushden. The ward

benefits from 26.9m2 per person of open space with children’s play equipment whilst it

48



October 2015

N322/2

benefits from a total of 30.4m2 of general open space per person. Although these figures

are boosted by Manor Park, the open space sites are generally well dispersed and

accessible to the majority of residents. In regard to children’s play equipment, the

provision of a NEAP to serve the north of the ward would be beneficial.

Hayden

8.8 The Hayden ward, with the largest population, has the second worst provision of open

space with children’s play equipment out of the five wards at 4.1m2 per person. Whereas

the ward benefits from a moderate supply of open space at 12.4m2 per person. This

shows that there is open space that can be utilised to provide more children’s play

equipment. The largest open space site within Hayden is the Cemetery & Chapel site at

45,000m2 whilst there are a host of other sites ranging from 2013m2 to 16,000m2. In

regard to children’s play equipment the centre of the ward lacks provision, particularly a

NEAP, which could service this ward and part of Bates.

Spencer

8.9 The Spencer ward, third most populated, has a moderate provision of both open space

with children’s play equipment and general open space at 12.6m2 per person. This

provision exceeds the national benchmark of 10m2 per person. Spencer Park provides

the majority of the open space at 60,000m2 whilst there are a host of other smaller open

space sites within the ward. In regard to children’s play equipment the ward is fairly well

serviced with NEAPs, LEAPs and LAPs, however, there is no NEAP to the west of the

ward whilst there is also scope to improve the amount of LAPs.

Pemberton

8.10 The Pemberton ward, second most populated, provision of open space with children’s

play equipment and general open space is extremely poor at 2m2 per person. This when

compared against the national benchmark for children’s play equipment of 10m2 per

person and the other wards in Rushden shows a severe under provision within the ward.

Provision of another NEAP within the ward as well as upgrades to the current LAPs and

LEAPs will assist the ward in providing more open children’s play equipment and subject

to funding and viability, consideration should be given to identifying a preferred site for

a standalone new facility.

49



October 2015

N322/2

Sartoris

8.11 The Sartoris ward, the least populated, benefits from a moderate supply of open space

with children’s play equipment and general open space at 13.2m2. Over one third of this

supply consists of Hall Park, covering 39,000m2, whilst there are a range of other sites

which are predominately small in comparison. Despite the NEAP at Hall Park servicing

the majority of the ward one of the LEAPs to the west could be upgraded to ensure all

residents have suitable access to the children’s play provision. The ward also has one

of the highest amounts of open space sites although because of the size of these, the

total amount is the second lowest of the wards.

Leisure and Community Facilities

8.12 A public consultation held in June 2015 highlighted an aspiration for a function room

capable of accommodating 150 to 200 people, which allowed for a range of day uses

(including multi-sports and seasonal theatre usage), ideally easily accessible in the

centre of town.

50



October 2015

N322/2

OPEN SPACE SITE PROFILE 01

Ward level

Surplus

Deficit

Play equipment quality

Green

Amber

Red

(None)

Sports provision

Football

Rugby

Cricket

Tennis

(None)

Landscaping quality

Green

Amber

Red

Possible habitat value

Green

Amber

Red

Recommendation

Safeguard

Safeguard & Improve

Reduce

Dispose

Aintree Drive

Size: 1456m2

Commentary Located in the Bates ward, the open space is easily accessible to many

residential dwellings in close proximity. There are some landscaping in

the form of bushes and trees around the border with the grass well

maintained. The area is capable of hosting some wildlife due to the

landscaping although none were identified on the site survey. The

landscaping creates a green area in an otherwise urban location thus

scoring amber for potential habitat value.

Children’s play equipment

The space benefits from an enclosed Local Area of Play (LAP), located

centrally, that is reasonably well maintained including a waste bin and

four benches.

51



October 2015

N322/2


Ward level

Surplus

Deficit


Green

Amber

Red

(None)

Sports provision

Football

Rugby

Cricket

Tennis

(None)

Landscaping quality

Green

Amber

Red


Green

Amber

Red

Recommendation

Safeguard

Safeguard & Improve

Reduce

Dispose

Allen Road

Size: 176m2

Commentary Located in the Hayden ward, the open space site is easily accessible to

the residential surroundings. Landscaping is minimal as grass surrounds

the children’s play equipment. Consequently the potential habitat value

is deemed to be low.


There is an enclosed Local Area of Play (LAP), located centrally, that is

reasonably well maintained. One waste bin and a bench accompany the

play equipment.

52



October 2015

N322/2


Ward level

Surplus

Deficit


Green

Amber

Red

(None)

Sports provision

Football

Rugby

Cricket

Tennis

(None)

Landscaping quality

Green

Amber

Red


Green

Amber

Red

Recommendation

Safeguard

Safeguard & Improve

Reduce

Dispose

Ascot Road

Size: 4000m2

Commentary Located in the Bates ward, site forms the character of the area and is

focal to the surrounding residential properties amenity. As well as the

play equipment, there are paths and benches provided as part of a wider

open space. The recommendation is to safeguard and improve to allow

for a sports pitch or children’s play equipment.


The space hosts an enclosed Local Equipped Area for Play (LEAP)

partially split between play equipment for different age groups. The

equipment is well maintained with waste bins and benches provided.

Landscaping and Habitat

The open space has trees and hedges predominantly around the

perimeter whilst grass is the prominent surface. Although the grass is

well maintained the hedges are partially maintained. Whilst the area is

capable of hosting wildlife due to the landscaping, the extent of this is not

significant leading to a moderate potential habitat value.

53



October 2015

N322/2


Ward level

Surplus

Deficit


Green

Amber

Red

(None)

Sports provision

Football

Rugby

Cricket

Tennis

(None)

Landscaping quality

Green

Amber

Red


Green

Amber

Red

Recommendation

Safeguard

Safeguard & Improve

Reduce

Dispose

Beaumaris

Size: 1500m2

Commentary Located in the Bates ward the open space site tapers to the rear with one

focal entrance point from Oakpits Way. There is no sports or children’s

play equipment provision. The recommendation is to safeguard although

the site’s reduction in size can be justified due to the location of the

adjacent Oakpits Way open space site.

Landscaping

The perimeter of the space is lined with mature hedges and trees that are

well maintained. The remaining floor space is grass which is also well

maintained.

Habitat

Due to the sites landscaping and location near another open space site

the habitat value is regarded to be reasonably high.

54



October 2015

N322/2


Ward level

Surplus

Deficit


Green

Amber

Red

(None)

Sports provision

Football

Rugby

Cricket

Tennis

(None)

Landscaping quality

Green

Amber

Red


Green

Amber

Red

Recommendation

Safeguard

Safeguard & Improve

Reduce

Dispose

Bedford Road

Size: 800m2

Commentary Located in the Sartoris ward, the open space site is a thoroughfare

between residential development and Bedford Road.

Landscaping

The only landscaping comes in the form of grass which is either side of

the path, going through the centre of the site.

Habitat

Due to the lack of the landscaping the habitat value is relatively low.

55



October 2015

N322/2


Ward level

Surplus

Deficit


Green

Amber

Red

(None)

Sports provision

Football

Rugby

Cricket

Tennis

(None)

Landscaping quality

Green

Amber

Red


Green

Amber

Red

Recommendation

Safeguard

Safeguard & Improve

Reduce

Dispose

Campbell Close

Size: 950m2

Commentary Located in the Bates ward, the site is open space predominantly

consisting of grass with some landscaping. The site is central to many

residential properties surrounding it.

Landscaping

There are some trees sporadically located to the edge of the site whilst

grass is the main surface.

Habitat

Despite there being grass and some trees the habitat value is not very

high.

56



October 2015

N322/2


Ward level

Surplus

Deficit


Green

Amber

Red

(None)

Sports provision

Football

Rugby

Cricket

Tennis

(None)

Landscaping quality

Green

Amber

Red


Green

Amber

Red

Recommendation

Safeguard

Safeguard & Improve

Reduce

Dispose

Birkdale Drive

Size: 1456m2

Commentary Located in the Bates ward, the open space site is located around

residential development and the A6 road.


There is an enclosed Local Area for Play (LAP) which has been extended

recently to comprise of numerous apparatus as well as a waste bins and

a bench.

Landscaping

Outside the LAP there is an abundance of hedges which are very well

maintained creating an attractive setting. The northern perimeter has

mature trees whilst the grass is also well maintained.

Habitat

Due to the sites location next to open space to the north coupled with the

extent of the landscaping the habitat value is regarded to be high.

57



October 2015

N322/2


Ward level

Surplus

Deficit


Green

Amber

Red

(None)

Sports provision

Football

Rugby

Cricket

Tennis

(None)

Landscaping quality

Green

Amber

Red


Green

Amber

Red

Recommendation

Safeguard

Safeguard & Improve

Reduce

Dispose

Campion Close

Size: 7000m2

Commentary The open space site is located in the Bates ward with residential

properties entirely surrounding it. The recommendation is to safeguard

and improve as there is scope for children’s play equipment on a small

scale.

Landscaping

Over half of the perimeter of the site is defined by mature trees and

hedges. The vast amount of the open space is grass whilst there are a

limited number of trees in this space.

Habitat

The habitat value is medium as the open space is located near the large

Jubilee Park with the landscaping making it possible for wildlife to grow.

58



October 2015

N322/2


Ward level

Surplus

Deficit


Green

Amber

Red

(None)

Sports provision

Football

Rugby

Cricket

Tennis

(None)

Landscaping quality

Green

Amber

Red


Green

Amber

Red

Recommendation

Safeguard

Safeguard & Improve

Reduce

Dispose

Clover Drive

Size: 3500m2

Commentary The enclosed open space site is located adjacent to Jubilee Park in the

ward of Bates. There is no provision of children’s play equipment or for

sport. The access is limited to two areas which link residential areas to

Jubilee Park also.

Landscaping

The perimeter of the open space is made up of mature trees and hedges

with a limited amount located centrally. The grass is well maintained

throughout the site.

Habitat

The habitat value is regarded as high due to the extent of landscaping

and the close proximity to Jubilee Park.

59



October 2015

N322/2


Ward level

Surplus

Deficit


Green

Amber

Red

(None)

Sports provision

Football

Rugby

Cricket

Tennis

(None)

Landscaping quality

Green

Amber

Red


Green

Amber

Red

Recommendation

Safeguard

Safeguard & Improve

Reduce

Dispose

Coltsfoot Road

Size: 250m2

Commentary This small open space site is host to a Local Area for Play (LAP)

surrounded by residential properties within the Bates ward.


The space is host to a LAP which has 3 apparatus, is fully enclosed, and

benefits from a waste bin and bench.

Landscaping

The area predominately consists of hardsurface around the play

equipment, although there are some trees, hedges and grass around the

periphery.

Habitat

The habitat value of the site is low due to the lack of landscaping and

surrounding urban area.

60



October 2015

N322/2


Ward level

Surplus

Deficit


Green

Amber

Red

(None)

Sports provision

Football

Rugby

Cricket

Tennis

(None)

Landscaping quality

Green

Amber

Red


Green

Amber

Red

Recommendation

Safeguard

Safeguard & Improve

Reduce

Dispose

Deacon Close Park

Size: 8600m2

Commentary The site is located in the Hayden ward, to the east of the urban area with

the A6 to the immediate east of it. The urban surroundings is made up of

mainly residential dwellings.

Children’s play provision

The site has an enclosed Local Equipped Area for Play within the open

space which is showing general wear from usage.

Sports provision

There is a junior sized football pitch with two permanent sets of goal posts

as well as a basketball hoop. These are reasonably well maintained

although are showing signs of usage. There is scope for the provision of

another sports pitch.

Landscaping

The perimeter of the site consists of mature trees whilst the open space

is predominately grass.

61



October 2015

N322/2


Ward level

Surplus

Deficit


Green

Amber

Red

(None)

Sports provision

Football

Rugby

Cricket

Tennis

(None)

Landscaping quality

Green

Amber

Red


Green

Amber

Red

Recommendation

Safeguard

Safeguard & Improve

Reduce

Dispose

Fosse Green

Size: 8000m2

Commentary The site is located in the Hayden ward servicing a predominantly

residential area.


There is a Local Equipped Area for Play (LEAP) consisting of a set of

swings which are reasonably well maintained.

Landscaping

The vast majority of the site is covered in well maintained grass with a

lack of other landscaping.

Habitat

The habitat value is low due to the lack of landscaping and urban

surroundings.

62



October 2015

N322/2


Ward level

Surplus

Deficit


Green

Amber

Red

(None)

Sports provision

Football

Rugby

Cricket

Tennis

(None)

Landscaping quality

Green

Amber

Red


Green

Amber

Red

Recommendation

Safeguard

Safeguard & Improve

Reduce

Dispose

Glenfield Close

Size: 173m2

Commentary The site is located adjacent to Glenfield Close in the Spencer ward. The

site is thin strip of land with vegetation covering the vast majority.

Landscaping

The land is overgrown with trees and hedges although this does not

obstruct the pavement.

Habitat

Whilst not expansive in size the habitat value of the land is high due to

the landscaping.

63



October 2015

N322/2


Ward level

Surplus

Deficit


Green

Amber

Red

(None)

Sports provision

Football

Rugby

Cricket

Tennis

(None)

Landscaping quality

Green

Amber

Red


Green

Amber

Red

Recommendation

Safeguard

Safeguard & Improve

Reduce

Dispose

Hall Park

Size: 130,000m2

Commentary Hall Park is the most prominent Park in the centre of Rushden with a

range of facilities available to the public.


The Park benefits from a Neighbourhood Equipped Area for Play (NEAP)

which provides equipment for a range of ages.

Landscaping

The park has a wide range of landscaping including mature trees and

flower beds which are well maintained.

Habitat

The wide ranging landscaping and vast area the park covers results in a

diverse habitat.

64



October 2015

N322/2


Ward level

Surplus

Deficit


Green

Amber

Red

(None)

Sports provision

Football

Rugby

Cricket

Tennis

(None)

Landscaping quality

Green

Amber

Red


Green

Amber

Red

Recommendation

Safeguard

Safeguard & Improve

Reduce

Dispose

Headingley Road

Size: 2013m2

Commentary The open space site is located within the Hayden ward fronting

residential properties.

Landscaping

The site acts as a ‘green’ for the properties immediately surrounding it

with the surface area covered in grass. There are three trees on the site

of different maturity.

Habitat

Due to the lack of sufficient landscaping the site is deemed to be of a

poor habitat value.

65



October 2015

N322/2

©


Ward level

Surplus

Deficit


Green

Amber

Red

(None)

Sports provision

Football

Rugby

Cricket

Tennis

(None)

Landscaping quality

Green

Amber

Red


Green

Amber

Red

Recommendation

Safeguard

Safeguard & Improve

Reduce

Dispose

Hilly Farm - Greenacre Drive

Size: 12,000m2

Commentary The open space site is located within the Sartoris ward creating a green

buffer abutting a series of residential dwellings. The red line shows the

extent of provision of children’s play equipment.


The open space has an enclosed Local Equipped Area for Play (LEAP)

which is reasonably well maintained.

Landscaping

The prominent landscaping feature include grass covering the majority of

the site and trees that are located on the northern border. Otherwise there

is a limited amount of landscaping.

Habitat

The habitat is not vast due to the lack of landscaping although the

northern boundary improves the diversification.

66



October 2015

N322/2

©


Ward level

Surplus

Deficit


Green

Amber

Red

(None)

Sports provision

Football

Rugby

Cricket

Tennis

(None)

Landscaping quality

Green

Amber

Red


Green

Amber

Red

Recommendation

Safeguard

Safeguard & Improve

Reduce

Dispose

Jubilee Park

Size: 39,000m2

Commentary Jubilee Park is an expansive open space site located in the Sartoris ward,

easily accessible to the south of Rushden. The park is also host to a

youth shelter whilst it has been designated as a “Town Green”, which

affords very strong protection.


There is an enclosed Local Equipped Area for Play (LEAP) on site which

is well maintained with waste bins and benches.

Sports provision

There are two full size rugby pitches used by Rushden & Higham Rugby

Club as well as one full size football pitch and a skate park. The sports

pitches also have access to changing rooms and a car park with

approximately 15 spaces.

Landscaping

The landscaping is predominantly around the periphery, consisting of mature trees and hedges. The vast open space is covered in grass which is well maintained.

67



October 2015

N322/2


Ward level

Surplus

Deficit


Green

Amber

Red

(None)

Sports provision

Football

Rugby

Cricket

Tennis

(None)

Landscaping quality

Green

Amber

Red


Green

Amber

Red

Recommendation

Safeguard

Safeguard & Improve

Reduce

Dispose

Keats Way

Size: 1338m2

Commentary Keats Way is a registered village green site surrounded by a

predominantly residential area in west Rushden. The site does not

benefit from children’s play facilities nor is there any sport provision

leaving scope for improvement.

Landscaping

The open space is mostly covered in grass which was somewhat

overgrown on the day of the site visit although reasonably well

maintained on the whole.

Habitat

Due to the overgrown nature of the grass the open space is likely to host

some wildlife although the location in an urban area and lack of other

vegetation restricts this somewhat.

68



October 2015

N322/2


Ward level

Surplus

Deficit


Green

Amber

Red

(None)

Sports provision

Football

Rugby

Cricket

Tennis

(None)

Landscaping quality

Green

Amber

Red


Green

Amber

Red

Recommendation

Safeguard

Safeguard & Improve

Reduce

Dispose

Lime Street

Size: 700m2

Commentary The site is host to a Local Area of Play (LAP) in close proximity to

residential units within the Spencer ward. There is no sports provision

whilst the landscaping is minimal resulting in a poor possible habitat

value.


The LAP is secure with metal fencing, waste bins, a bench and 5

apparatus of a good standard.

69



October 2015

N322/2


Ward level

Surplus

Deficit


Green

Amber

Red

(None)

Sports provision

Football

Rugby

Cricket

Tennis

(None)

Landscaping quality

Green

Amber

Red


Green

Amber

Red

Recommendation

Safeguard

Safeguard & Improve

Reduce

Dispose

Lynford Way

Size: 915m2

Commentary The site is host to a Local Equipped Area of Play (LEAP) serving a

residential area in south west Rushden within the Pemberton ward. There

is no sports provision nor is there any landscaping meaning the potential

habitat value is low.


The LEAP is in good condition with a variety of apparatus. The play

equipment for young children is sufficiently secure whilst the area is

serviced by waste bins and a bench. Although the area is showing signs

of general wear and tear it is of a good standard.

70



October 2015

N322/2


Ward level

Surplus

Deficit


Green

Amber

Red

(None)

Sports provision

Football

Rugby

Cricket

Tennis

(None)

Landscaping quality

Green

Amber

Red


Green

Amber

Red

Recommendation

Safeguard

Safeguard & Improve

Reduce

Dispose

Magnolia Drive

Size: 4300m2

Commentary This site, located within the Sartoris ward, consists of three open spaces

without any children’s play provision nor any sports provision. A

recommendation is for the introduction of children’s play equipment to

help alleviate the current shortfall within the ward.

Landscaping quality

The three open spaces are important to the character of the area which

is predominantly residential in nature. Grass covers the three open

spaces with some hedges and tress sporadically located. The

landscaping is well maintained.

Habitat value

The potential habitat value of the three open spaces is deemed to be

moderate as the hedges and grass are natural habitats for wildlife whilst

the landscaping is of high quality.

71



October 2015

N322/2


Ward level

Surplus

Deficit


Green

Amber

Red

(None)

Sports provision

Football

Rugby

Cricket

Tennis

(None)

Landscaping quality

Green

Amber

Red


Green

Amber

Red

Recommendation

Safeguard

Safeguard & Improve

Reduce

Dispose

Mallards

Size: 150m2

Commentary Mallards site is located within the Pemberton ward of Rushden. Situated

adjacent to the Mallards open space site it is host to a Local Area of Play

(LAP). The site does not benefit from sports provision nor is there

landscaping, therefore, the potential habitat value is considered low.


The LAP is very secure with waste bins and a bench. The play equipment

is in good condition and in a central location to surrounding residential

properties. It also serves the adjacent Mallards open space site.

72



October 2015

N322/2


Ward level

Surplus

Deficit


Green

Amber

Red

(None)

Sports provision

Football

Rugby

Cricket

Tennis

(None)

Landscaping quality

Green

Amber

Red


Green

Amber

Red

Recommendation

Safeguard

Safeguard & Improve

Reduce

Dispose

Mallards Open Space

Size: 8200m2

Commentary Located within the Rushden ward of Pemberton, the sites key

characteristic is its fishing ponds. There is no sports provision nor is there

children’s play equipment provision. Although there is a Local Area of

Play (LAP) situated adjacent to the site.

Landscaping

The open space is well maintained with a mixture of fishing ponds, grass,

hedges and tress around the site. Some of the landscaping is mature and

varied.

Habitat

The potential habitat value is considered to be very high due to the fishing

ponds being host to different species of fish coupled with the variety of

landscaping and amphibia resulting in a high value for wildlife.

73



October 2015

N322/2


Ward level

Surplus

Deficit


Green

Amber

Red

(None)

Sports provision

Football

Rugby

Cricket

Tennis

(None)

Landscaping quality

Green

Amber

Red


Green

Amber

Red

Recommendation

Safeguard

Partial Improve

Reduce

Partial Dispose

Manor Park

Size: 90,000m2

Commentary Manor Park is large site situated in the Bates ward to the south of

Rushden. Located on Bedford Road (A5028) it does not have any

children’s play equipment. The amount of vacant land means the site is

ideal for partial redevelopment, whilst safeguarding the balance for

outdoor sport.

Sport’s provision

Approximately half of the site is used for Rugby purposes

accommodating two full size pitches a club house, and a small number

of parking spaces.

Landscaping and habitat

Some of the site is home to overgrown vegetation that seems unused,

although some of the site is well maintained including trees and hedges.

The possible habitat value is moderate due to the expansive open space

with overgrown vegetation. However, much of the site is urban in nature

with hardstanding, rugby pitches and a club house.

74



October 2015

N322/2


Ward level

Surplus

Deficit


Green

Amber

Red

(None)

Sports provision

Football

Rugby

Cricket

Tennis

(None)

Landscaping quality

Green

Amber

Red


Green

Amber

Red

Recommendation

Safeguard

Safeguard & Improve

Reduce

Dispose

Maye Dicks Road

Size: 550m2

Commentary The open space site, located within the Bates ward, is relatively small in

size forming a backdrop to residential properties on Maye Dick Road. It

does not have any sports provision nor does it have any children’s play

equipment. The landscaping consists of well-maintained grass and

approximately ten trees. The potential habitat value is considered to be

low.

75



October 2015

N322/2


Ward level

Surplus

Deficit


Green

Amber

Red

(None)

Sports provision

Football

Rugby

Cricket

Tennis

(Other)

Landscaping quality

Green

Amber

Red


Green

Amber

Red

Recommendation

Safeguard

Safeguard & Improve

Reduce

Dispose

Melloway Park

Size: 16,000m2

Commentary Melloway Park is located within the Spencer ward to the west of

Rushden. Rectangular shaped with a gradient from east to west it is a

key characteristic of the locality. Landscaping consists of predominately

grass throughout and a large tree centrally located with hedges and

smaller trees around the periphery. The park is also host to a youth

shelter.


There is a Local Equipped Area of Play (LEAP) located to the west of the

site. The maintenance is reasonable with a variety of apparatus available,

whilst being secure with fencing and host to a waste bin.

Sport’s provision

The sport’s provision consists of a basketball hoop centrally located

which is of sufficient standard.

76



October 2015

N322/2


Ward level

Surplus

Deficit


Green

Amber

Red

(None)

Sports provision

Football

Rugby

Cricket

Tennis

(None)

Landscaping quality

Green

Amber

Red


Green

Amber

Red

Recommendation

Safeguard

Safeguard & Improve

Reduce

Dispose

Rushden Cemetery

Size: 45,000m2

Commentary The Cemetery is a vast open space site located within the Hayden ward

in east Rushden. The site is very well maintained with high quality

landscaping. The potential habitat value is considered to be high due to

the size of the site coupled with the variation in landscaping.

77



October 2015

N322/2


Ward level

Surplus

Deficit


Green

Amber

Red

(None)

Sports provision

Football

Rugby

Cricket

Tennis

(None)

Landscaping quality

Green

Amber

Red


Green

Amber

Red

Recommendation

Safeguard

Safeguard & Improve

Reduce

Dispose

Oakpits Way

Size: 8500m2

Commentary This is an open space site located in the Bates ward in a primarily

residential area. There is no sports provision nor is there any children’s

play equipment. The landscaping consists of grass in the main with some

trees and hedges surrounding the periphery. The habitat value is deemed

to be moderate as it is located adjacent to another open space site,

however, the immediate surroundings are urban in nature. The

recommendation is to safeguard and improve to allow for a sports pitch.

78



October 2015

N322/2


Ward level

Surplus

Deficit


Green

Amber

Red

(None)

Sports provision

Football

Rugby

Cricket

Tennis

(None)

Landscaping quality

Green

Amber

Red


Green

Amber

Red

Recommendation

Safeguard

Safeguard & Improve

Reduce

Dispose

Rose Avenue

Size: 3500m2

Commentary The site is located within the Pemberton ward, adjacent to allotment

gardens and dwellings. Access is gained on a small opening to the east

of the site. There is no sport’s provision. The landscape quality is low

whilst the habitat value is considered to be poor.


There is a Neighbourhood Equipped Area of Play (NEAP) on the site that

is of moderate quality. The apparatus is varied, however, is poorly

maintained which can be improved upon.

79



October 2015

N322/2


Ward level

Surplus

Deficit


Green

Amber

Red

(None)

Sports provision

Football

Rugby

Cricket

Tennis

(None)

Landscaping quality

Green

Amber

Red


Green

Amber

Red

Recommendation

Safeguard

Safeguard & Improve

Reduce

Dispose

Spencer Park

Size: 60,000m2

Commentary Located within the Spencer ward, Jubilee Park is the third largest open

space site in Rushden which is easily accessible from the north of the

town. The park is well maintained in general, inclusive of a youth shelter,

whilst it is possible to allocate some of the park for other uses.


There is an enclosed NEAP and MUGA on site which are well maintained

with waste bins and benches as well as a play area.

Sports provision

There are two full size football pitches as well as six enclosed tennis

courts. There is scope for the provision of an ATP on site.

Landscaping

The landscaping is predominantly around the periphery and around the

stream, which consists of mature trees and hedges. The vast open space

is covered in grass which is well maintained.

80



October 2015

N322/2


Ward level

Surplus

Deficit


Green

Amber

Red

(None)

Sports provision

Football

Rugby

Cricket

Tennis

(None)

Landscaping quality

Green

Amber

Red


Green

Amber

Red

Recommendation

Safeguard

Safeguard & Improve

Reduce

Dispose

Sylmond Gardens

Size: 860m2

Commentary The open space site is located within the Sartoris ward providing

children’s play equipment to the surrounding residents. There is minimal

landscaping, therefore, the potential habitat value is perceived to be low.


The site is host to a Local Area of Play (LEAP) which is reasonably well

maintained serviced by a waste bin and bench.

81



October 2015

N322/2


Ward level

Surplus

Deficit


Green

Amber

Red

(None)

Sports provision

Football

Rugby

Cricket

Tennis

(None)

Landscaping quality

Green

Amber

Red


Green

Amber

Red

Recommendation

Safeguard

Safeguard & Improve

Reduce

Dispose

Tennyson Road / Highfield Road

Size: 1100m2

Commentary This an open space site, in the Pemberton ward, on the junction of

Tennyson Road and Highfield Road. The site consists of grass and two

trees adjacent to Tennyson Road. There is no children’s play equipment

nor is there provision for sport. The recommendation is to safeguard the

open space site as there is already a LAP in close proximity and the site

is deemed unsuitable to host sports provision.

82



October 2015

N322/2


Ward level

Surplus

Deficit


Green

Amber

Red

(None)

Sports provision

Football

Rugby

Cricket

Tennis

(None)

Landscaping quality

Green

Amber

Red


Green

Amber

Red

Recommendation

Safeguard

Safeguard & Improve

Reduce

Dispose

Tewkesbury

Size: 2000m2

Commentary Located within the Bates ward, the open space site forms part of a

relatively new development with provision for children’s play equipment.

There is no sports provision however. The landscaping is of a good

standard whilst the potential habitat value is deemed to be moderate due

to the urban surroundings.


The Local Area of Play (LAP) is well maintained, enclosed and host to a

waste bin and bench.

83



October 2015

N322/2


Ward level

Surplus

Deficit


Green

Amber

Red

(None)

Sports provision

Football

Rugby

Cricket

Tennis

(Other)

Landscaping quality

Green

Amber

Red


Green

Amber

Red

Recommendation

Safeguard

Safeguard & Improve

Reduce

Dispose

Trafford Road Park

Size: 8000m2

Commentary Located in the Hayden ward, the site is situated to the rear of residential

properties with provision of children’s play equipment. A basketball hoop

and small court is the extent of the sports provision. The site is

maintained to an acceptable standard although this can be improved

upon. The landscaping is satisfactory although this mainly consists of

grass, mature trees along the boundary and some hedges also. The

potential habitat value is perceived to be moderate.


The site is host to a LEAP which is showing wear and tear, therefore, can

be improved upon.

84



October 2015

N322/2


Ward level

Surplus

Deficit


Green

Amber

Red

(None)

Sports provision

Football

Rugby

Cricket

Tennis

(None)

Landscaping quality

Green

Amber

Red


Green

Amber

Red

Recommendation

Safeguard

Safeguard & Improve

Reduce

Dispose

Tweed Close

Size: 3600m2

Commentary Located within the Hayden ward, the open space forms part of a new

development currently under construction. The landscaping and potential

habitat value are deemed to be of moderate value as the development is

not fully occupied at the time this Study has been completed. The site will

be host to a Local Equipped Area of Play (LEAP) on completion.

85



October 2015

N322/2


Ward level

Surplus

Deficit


Green

Amber

Red

(None)

Sports provision

Football

Rugby

Cricket

Tennis

(None)

Landscaping quality

Green

Amber

Red


Green

Amber

Red

Recommendation

Safeguard

Safeguard & Improve

Reduce

Dispose

War Memorial

Size: 565m2

Commentary Located within the Sartoris ward, the War Memorial is a very well

maintained, centrally located, open space comprising of a Grade II listed

monument. The landscaping is very well maintained with flower beds,

hedges and trees to the rear. The recommendation is to safeguard this

open space site.

86



October 2015

N322/2


Ward level

Surplus

Deficit


Green

Amber

Red

(None)

Sports provision

Football

Rugby

Cricket

Tennis

(None)

Landscaping quality

Green

Amber

Red


Green

Amber

Red

Recommendation

Safeguard

Safeguard & Improve

Reduce

Dispose

Yarrow Close

Size: 226m2

Commentary Located within the Sartoris ward, the small open space site is solely host

to children’s play equipment. There is no sports provision. The

landscaping is provided by grass and hedges which are well maintained.

Due to the small scale of the site the potential habitat value is deemed to

be low.


The site benefits from a Local Area of Play (LAP), easily accessible from

the surrounding residential setting, which is well maintained and serviced

by a waste bin and bench.

87



October 2015

N322/2

Appendix A – Wards of Rushden

Bates


Ward level

Surplus

Deficit


Green

Amber

Red

(None)

Sports provision

Football

Rugby

Cricket

Tennis

(None)

Landscaping quality

Green

Amber

Red


Green

Amber

Red

Recommendation

Safeguard

Safeguard & Improve

Reduce

Dispose

Yeldon Close

Size: 275m2

Commentary Located in the Spencer ward, the site is host to children’s play equipment.

It does not provide for sports whilst the landscaping, hedges and grass,

is well maintained.


The site has a Local Area of Play (LAP) which is secure, well maintained

with a waste bin and bench, and located within a short distance from

residential development.

88



October 2015

N322/2


Bates


Ward level

Surplus

Deficit


Green

Amber

Red

(None)

Sports provision

Football

Rugby

Cricket

Tennis

(None)

Landscaping quality

Green

Amber

Red


Green

Amber

Red

Recommendation

Safeguard

Safeguard & Improve

Reduce

Dispose

Highfield Road/Tennyson Road

Size: 725m2

Commentary The site is located in the Pemberton ward, a short distance from

residential development. It does not provide for sports nor is it host to

children’s play equipment. Whilst certain aspects of the pocket park are

well maintained, such as a waste bin and bench, the landscaping is poor.

Therefore the recommendation is to safeguard and improve the site

particularly in regard to landscaping.

89



October 2015

N322/2


Bates

90



October 2015

N322/2

Hayden

91



October 2015

N322/2

Spencer

92



October 2015

N322/2

Pemberton

93



October 2015

N322/2

Sartoris

94



October 2015

N322/2

Appendix 3 – Parks & Open Spaces Audit

Site

Number

Site Name Site Address Site Description Site Size

(m2)

1 Aintree Drive Aintree Drive, Rushden LAP 1456

2 Allen Road Carey Way (Top of Allen

Road), Rushden

LAP 176

3 Ascot Road Ascot Road, Rushden LEAP 4000

4 Beaumaris Beaumaris Close,

Rushden

Open Space 1500

5 Bedford Road Land of Bedford Road

leading onto Daisy Croft,

Rushden

Open Space 800

6 Campbell Close Campbell Close, Rushden Open Space 970

7 Birkdale Birkdale Drive, Rushden LAP 1456

8 Campion Close Campion Close, Rushden Open Space 7000

9 Clover Drive Site at the end of Clover

Drive leading on to Jubilee

Park, Rushden

Open Space 3500

10 Coltsfoot Road Coltsfoot Road, Rushden

LAP 250

11 Deacon Close

Park

Deacon Close, Rushden

LEAP 8600

12 Fosse Green Fosse Green, Rushden LEAP 8000

13 Glenfield close Glenfield Close, Rushden Shrub bed / Trees 173

14 Hall Park Hall Avenue, Rushden NEAP 130000

16 Headingley

road

Headingley Road,

Rushden

Open Space 2013

17 Hilly Farm -

Greenacre

Drive

Greenacre

Drive/Meadowsweet

Road, Rushden

LEAP 12000

18 Jubilee Park Jubilee Park, Bedford

Road, Rushden

NEAP 39000

19 Keats Way Footpath off

Wellingborough Road

leading to Keats Way ,

Rushden

Open Space 1338

20 Lime Street Lime Street, Rushden LAP 700

21 Lynford Way Lynford Way, Rushden LEAP 915

22 Magnolia Drive

three areas

Magnolia Drive, Rushden Open Space 4300

95



October 2015

N322/2

23 Mallards Centaine Way, Courtney

Road, Rushden

LEAP 150

24 Mallards Open

Space

Centaine Way, Courtney

Road, Rushden

Open Space 8200

25 Manor park Bedford Road, Rushden NEAP 90000

26 Maye Dicks

Road

Maye Dicks Road,

Rushden

Open Space 620

27 Melloway Road Melloway Road, Rushden LEAP 16000

28 Newton Road

Cemetery

Newton Road, 145

Newton Road, Rushden

Cemetery &

Chapel Site

45000

29 Oakpits Way Oakpits Way, Rushden Open Space 8500

30 Rose Avenue Recreation Ground, rear of

31 and 65 Rose Avenue,

Rushden

LEAP 3500

31 Spencer Park Washbrook Road,

Rushden

NEAP 60000

32 Sylmond

Gardens

Sylmond Gardens,

Rushden

LEAP 860

33 Tennyson

Road/Highfield

Road

Highfield Road, Rushden Open Space 1100

34 Tewkesbury Tewkesbury Drive,

Rushden

LAP 2000

35 Trafford Road

Park

57 Trafford Road,

Rushden

LEAP 8000

36 Tweed Close Tweed Close, Rushden LEAP 3600

37 War Memorial Skinners Hill, Rushden Open Space (War

Memorial)

565

38 Yarrow Close Yarrow Close, Rushden LAP 226

39 Yeldon Close Yelden Close, Rushden LAP 275

40 Highfield

Road/Tennyson

Road

Tennyson Road/Highfield

Road, Rushden

Pocket Park 725

96



October 2015

N322/2

Appendix C – Recommended Local Standards (Open Space SPD (2011))

97



October 2015

N322/2

Appendix D – Forecast Housing Supply 2011 – 2031 (Source: North Northamptonshire

Joint Core Strategy

98



October 2015

N322/2

Appendix E – Children’s Play Provision Site by Site Assessment

Site

No.

Site Name Site

Description

Total Site Area

(m2)

Quality

1 Aintree Drive LAP 1456 Good

2 Allen Road LAP 176 Fair

3 Ascot Road LEAP 4000 Good

7 Birkdale LAP 1456 Good

10 Coltsfoot Road LAP 250 Good

11 Deacon Close

Park

LEAP 8600 Fair

12 Fosse Green LEAP 8000 Fair

14 Hall Park NEAP 130000 Good

15 Harborough Way

- site currently

being

redeveloped

LAP

17 Hilly Farm -

Greenacre Drive

LEAP 12000 Good

18 Jubilee Park NEAP 39000 Good

20 Lime Street LAP 700 Good

21 Lynford Way LEAP 915 Good

23 Mallards LEAP 150 Good

25 Manor park NEAP 90000 Fair

27 Melloway Road LEAP 16000 Good

30 Rose Avenue LEAP 3500 Fair

31 Spencer Park NEAP 60000 Fair

32 Sylmond

Gardens

LEAP 860 Good

34 Tewkesbury LAP 2000 Good

35 Trafford Road

Park

LEAP 8000 Good

36 Tweed Close LEAP 3600 Fair

38 Yarrow Close LAP 226 Good

39 Yeldon Close LAP 275 Good

99



October 2015

N322/2

Appendix F – Children’s Play Provision

Rushden Open Space, Recreation and Sport Study€¦ · 1.1 DLP Planning Ltd was commissioned by...

Documents

Transcript of Rushden Open Space, Recreation and Sport Study€¦ · 1.1 DLP Planning Ltd was commissioned by...