Running Statistics Rachel Passman, Ciara Gilligan, and Ryan Biemuller.
-
Upload
riley-aubrey -
Category
Documents
-
view
224 -
download
0
Transcript of Running Statistics Rachel Passman, Ciara Gilligan, and Ryan Biemuller.
![Page 1: Running Statistics Rachel Passman, Ciara Gilligan, and Ryan Biemuller.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062404/551805c5550346c6568b5379/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Running Statistics
Rachel Passman, Ciara Gilligan, and Ryan Biemuller
![Page 2: Running Statistics Rachel Passman, Ciara Gilligan, and Ryan Biemuller.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062404/551805c5550346c6568b5379/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
• Man started running out of necessity and was used for communication – Pheidippides was a messenger who brought news
of battle• First sign of running as recreation
– 3200m race at the Olympics in Egypt (3000 B.C)• 17th century, running was used for gambling purposes• Training for running began with Finn Paavo Nurmi and
coach Pikala– Saw relationship between work and rest and
understood importance of interval training– Training became known as the terrace training
![Page 3: Running Statistics Rachel Passman, Ciara Gilligan, and Ryan Biemuller.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062404/551805c5550346c6568b5379/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
• 18th Century – Light weight leather shoe that can
grip the ground
• 19th Century– Croquet shoe with a rubber sole
with a canvas upper with laces – Spiked leather shoes also invented
• 20th Century– Created leather strip around shoe
to reduce stretching (known today as Keds)
– Converse sneakers
• 21st Century – modern synthetic shoes are made
of lightweight mesh fabric uppers and lightweight synthetic soles
– chosen for maximum flexibility and comfort
![Page 4: Running Statistics Rachel Passman, Ciara Gilligan, and Ryan Biemuller.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062404/551805c5550346c6568b5379/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
• The proportion of runners who wear legitimate running apparel
• What running sneaker is most popular
• What running sneaker is most popular within gender
![Page 5: Running Statistics Rachel Passman, Ciara Gilligan, and Ryan Biemuller.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062404/551805c5550346c6568b5379/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
• We went to go certain locations and parks such as Meyer Way Park, Turk Park, IPW, and Kemper Park– Supposed to go to stores
• Tried to go to parks at two different times– Early Saturday morning – After school Monday
• We observed data of runners coming through the parks– Type of sneaker– Type of sneaker vs. gender– Running apparel
![Page 6: Running Statistics Rachel Passman, Ciara Gilligan, and Ryan Biemuller.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062404/551805c5550346c6568b5379/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
Ad As B N NB S U
shoe_type
count
Collection 2 Bar Chart
![Page 7: Running Statistics Rachel Passman, Ciara Gilligan, and Ryan Biemuller.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062404/551805c5550346c6568b5379/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Ho: The observed frequency distribution of type of running shoe fits the expected distribution. Ha: The observed frequency distribution of type of running shoe doesn’t fit the expected distribution.
x2
= ∑ (obs-exp)2
/ exp= 24.00
Assumptions: 1. SRS 1.
assumed 2. All expected counts are greater than or equal to 5 2.
check
P(x^2>24I df=6)= 0.00052
![Page 8: Running Statistics Rachel Passman, Ciara Gilligan, and Ryan Biemuller.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062404/551805c5550346c6568b5379/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
We reject Ho because our p-value is less than alpha which equals 0.05.
We have sufficient evidence that the observed frequency distribution of the type of running shoe doesn’t fit the expected distribution.
![Page 9: Running Statistics Rachel Passman, Ciara Gilligan, and Ryan Biemuller.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062404/551805c5550346c6568b5379/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
gender
0
2
4
6
8
10
F
2
4
6
8
10
M
Ad As B N NB S U
shoe_type
count
![Page 10: Running Statistics Rachel Passman, Ciara Gilligan, and Ryan Biemuller.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062404/551805c5550346c6568b5379/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Ho: There is no association between the type of running shoe and gender variables.Ha: There is an association between the type of running shoe and gender variables.
Assumptions: 1. 2 independent SRS
1. assumed 2. All expected counts are greater than or equal to 5
2. no, but cont.
x2
= ∑ (obs-exp)2
/ exp= 3. 741
P(x^2>3.741I df=6)= 0.71
![Page 11: Running Statistics Rachel Passman, Ciara Gilligan, and Ryan Biemuller.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062404/551805c5550346c6568b5379/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
We fail to reject Ho because our p-value is greater than alpha which equals 0.05.
We have sufficient evidence that there is no association between the type of running shoe and gender variables
![Page 12: Running Statistics Rachel Passman, Ciara Gilligan, and Ryan Biemuller.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062404/551805c5550346c6568b5379/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Legit; 18
Not; 35
![Page 13: Running Statistics Rachel Passman, Ciara Gilligan, and Ryan Biemuller.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062404/551805c5550346c6568b5379/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Ho: p=0.50 Ha: p<0.50Assumptions: 1. SRS 1. assumed2. Np 2. (53x 0.50)
n(1-p) >10 (53x0.50) > 10 (no, but cont.)3. Pop > 10n 3. pop> 10x53
Z= p-p/ =-2.335^
P(z<-2.335)= 0.02
![Page 14: Running Statistics Rachel Passman, Ciara Gilligan, and Ryan Biemuller.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062404/551805c5550346c6568b5379/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
We reject Ho because our p-value is less than alpha which equals 0.05.
We have sufficient evidence that the proportion of people who wear legitimate apparel while running is < 0.50.
![Page 15: Running Statistics Rachel Passman, Ciara Gilligan, and Ryan Biemuller.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062404/551805c5550346c6568b5379/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
• The most popular brand of shoe is not affected by gender
• Most popular and least popular stay constant within both genders
• More than 50% of runners do not wear legitimate apparel (wear shorts and tees)
![Page 16: Running Statistics Rachel Passman, Ciara Gilligan, and Ryan Biemuller.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062404/551805c5550346c6568b5379/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
• Only analyzed runners in immediate area– Only observed runners in Bucks County
• Only went to parks– Runners might not have been as
legitimate as runners shopping in the stores
• Didn’t include people running at home or at gym– Didn’t ask questions
![Page 17: Running Statistics Rachel Passman, Ciara Gilligan, and Ryan Biemuller.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062404/551805c5550346c6568b5379/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
• If we were allowed to be in stores, we believed our legitimate apparel would have changed. – The shoe brands, such as Soucony and
Brooks would be more popular
• We believed prior to the test that Nike would be most popular and gender would have no affect on type of shoe.