Ruggieri Pipeline Integrity

download Ruggieri Pipeline Integrity

of 40

Transcript of Ruggieri Pipeline Integrity

  • 8/9/2019 Ruggieri Pipeline Integrity

    1/40

    Fracture Assessm ents of Mar ine

    Pipelines and Subsea Componentsin Host i le Environm ents:

    Cri t ical Concerns and Recent

    Developments

    Claudio Ruggieri

    NAMEFFractur e Mechanics and Struc tural Integr i ty Research Gro upFacul ty of Engin eering

    Universi ty of So Paulo - Brazi l

  • 8/9/2019 Ruggieri Pipeline Integrity

    2/40

    Outline

    Chal lenges in Pipeline Safety Standards:Link ing Design and Operation

    Current Pract ices and Standards for Defect

    and Safety As sessments of Pipel ines

    Innovat ive App roaches as More Rat ional andYet More Eff ic ient Integr i ty AssessmentProcedu res for High Perfomance Pipel ines

    Some Key Cr i t ical Concerns Dr iv ing FurtherResearch and Development

  • 8/9/2019 Ruggieri Pipeline Integrity

    3/40

    Going Farther and Deeper......

    Increasing Demand forFossil Fuels, Including

    Natural Gas, is Pushing

    Oil and Gas Exploitation

    and Production to

    Farther and Deeper

    Reservois in Difficult and

    Hostile Environments

    Technological Challenges in Pipeline and

    Riser Design, Installation, Operation,

    Inspection and Repair

  • 8/9/2019 Ruggieri Pipeline Integrity

    4/40

  • 8/9/2019 Ruggieri Pipeline Integrity

    5/40

    The Brazilian Pre-Salt Reservoir

  • 8/9/2019 Ruggieri Pipeline Integrity

    6/40

    Key Characteristics

    More than 2500 m Water Depth.

    2000 m Thickness Salt Layer.

    Gas Pipeline Larger than 18 in2500 m

    Long Distance to Shore (300 km)

    High CO2Content (8 ~ 20%)

  • 8/9/2019 Ruggieri Pipeline Integrity

    7/40

  • 8/9/2019 Ruggieri Pipeline Integrity

    8/40

    The Mysterious Design Factor....

    High Design Stresses Do Not Cause Failure.

    Damage Does!

    The 0.72 Design Facto r isa Histo r ical Facto r SetMore than 50 Years Ago !

    There is No Ration aland Convinc ing BasisAgains t Inc reasing It.

  • 8/9/2019 Ruggieri Pipeline Integrity

    9/40

    Fracture is Always a Concern ....

    Failure of Brazilian Pressure Vessel (2000)

    (Fracture Initiated at Weld Defect)

  • 8/9/2019 Ruggieri Pipeline Integrity

    10/40

    Conventional Defect Assessments

    FFS or ECA Analys is Requ ired

    Fundamental Procedure is Based on the GoodWorkmanship Phi losophy To Ensu re That thePipel ine/Riser is Free of Fabricat ion Defects

    However, Larger and Often Severe Defects Wil lInvar iably Occur Du ring the Pipeline and RiserServ ice Life.

  • 8/9/2019 Ruggieri Pipeline Integrity

    11/40

    Two-Parameter Assessment Line Describing

    the Interacion of Two Failure Modes:

    Bri t t le Fracture and Plast ic Col lapse

    Failure Assessment Diagram Approach

  • 8/9/2019 Ruggieri Pipeline Integrity

    12/40

    BS 7910 Level 2A

  • 8/9/2019 Ruggieri Pipeline Integrity

    13/40

    Key Assumption is that the FAD Curve

    Does Not Depend on Specimen

    Geometry and Strain Hardening:

    High Constra int Cond i t ionsLow to Moderate Duc t i le Material

    FAD Approach

    More Impo rtant, FAD Procedu re is aStress-Based Approach !

  • 8/9/2019 Ruggieri Pipeline Integrity

    14/40

    Current Scenario

    New Methods Should be Developed

    There is Growing Concern Supported by

    Strong Field Evidences that Conventional FFS

    Procedures are not Necessarily Applicable to

    Newer Materials and Complex Conditions:X100 Grade Steel, Ultra Deep Waters, Heavy

    Thickness Pipes, Sour Environment, etc.

  • 8/9/2019 Ruggieri Pipeline Integrity

    15/40

    Constraint Effects on Toughness

  • 8/9/2019 Ruggieri Pipeline Integrity

    16/40

    Flawed Pipes vs . SE(B) Specimens

    Cravero and Ruggieri (2007)

  • 8/9/2019 Ruggieri Pipeline Integrity

    17/40

    Flawed Pipes vs. SE(T) Specimens

    Cravero and Ruggieri (2007)

  • 8/9/2019 Ruggieri Pipeline Integrity

    18/40

    V5

    V6

    -1 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

    -1

    -0.8

    -0.6

    -0.4

    -0.2

    0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1

    V5

    V6

    -1 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

    -1

    -0.8

    -0.6

    -0.4

    -0.2

    0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1

    SE(T)-P a/W=0,520 Pipe a/t=0,5

    b

    yb

    y

    b

    x

    b

    x

    Crack-Tip Plastic Zones

    Cravero and Ruggieri (2007)

  • 8/9/2019 Ruggieri Pipeline Integrity

    19/40

    Constraint Modified FAD Approach

    ]1[0 rQmatQmat LKK

    ]1[)( rQrr LLfK

    ToughnessCorrect ion

  • 8/9/2019 Ruggieri Pipeline Integrity

    20/40

    Constraint Mod if ied FAD

  • 8/9/2019 Ruggieri Pipeline Integrity

    21/40

    Strain-Based Analys is Def ines a Lim it State

    Cond i t ion in Which Structu ral Behavior isControl led b y Imposed Displacements

    Strain-Based Analysis

    The Col lapse Analys is Bui l t Into FAD Procedu resRel ies on Determ inig Net Sect ion Yielding in theCrack Ligament

    For Higher Grade Steels or Overmatched Gir thWelds the App l ied Strain Can Be Much Higher

    than the Yield Strain

  • 8/9/2019 Ruggieri Pipeline Integrity

    22/40

    Strain-Based Analysis

    When the Material is in the Plast ic Range, SmallChanges in Stress Cause Large Changes in Strain

  • 8/9/2019 Ruggieri Pipeline Integrity

    23/40

    Pos t-Yield Behavio r Does Affect the TolerableDefect Size in a Struc tural Component

    Strain-Based Analysis

    After Yielding , the Evo lvin g Near-Tip Stressesand Crack Driving Forces (J, CTOD) Strong lyDepend on the Plast ic Straining Capaci ty

    Pipe Steels w ith Lower YT-Ratios (X60) May A llowLarger Defects than Higher YT-Ratios (X100)

  • 8/9/2019 Ruggieri Pipeline Integrity

    24/40

    Fracture Assessment Using API 579 L2

    0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1

    1.2

    0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2

    rK

    rL

    API Level 2

    Limit Load

    Correction

    %25.0

    f

  • 8/9/2019 Ruggieri Pipeline Integrity

    25/40

    On-Going Research

    Developm ent of Test Procedures forConstraint-Designed SE(T) Specim ens

    FFS Procedures and B iaxial Loading Effects

    on Reeled Risers

    Structu ral Integr i ty As sessments o f LinedPipes fo r Reeling

    Fat igue and Toughness Behavior of Gir thWelds o f Lined Pipes under H2Envi ronment

  • 8/9/2019 Ruggieri Pipeline Integrity

    26/40

  • 8/9/2019 Ruggieri Pipeline Integrity

    27/40

    Pipeline and Riser Installation

    Riser Ins tal lat ion by Reeling

  • 8/9/2019 Ruggieri Pipeline Integrity

    28/40

    FFS Procedures for Reeled Risers

  • 8/9/2019 Ruggieri Pipeline Integrity

    29/40

    Pipe Reeling Behavior

    (From SINTEF Materials Labor atory)

  • 8/9/2019 Ruggieri Pipeline Integrity

    30/40

    Pipe Reeling Behavior

    (From SINTEF Materials Labor atory)

  • 8/9/2019 Ruggieri Pipeline Integrity

    31/40

    FFS Procedures for Reeled Risers

  • 8/9/2019 Ruggieri Pipeline Integrity

    32/40

    FFS Procedures for Reeled Risers

    Full Compendium ofh1Factors Generated by

    Chiodo & Ruggieri in Polynomial Form

    for Easy Manipulation and Codification

    Proportionality Between J(CTOD) andApplied Loading is Very Good for High and

    Moderate Hardening (All Crack Config.) and

    Low Hardening (Shallow Cracks)

    Robust Procedure for Mos t Appl ications

  • 8/9/2019 Ruggieri Pipeline Integrity

    33/40

    Application to Pipe Reeling

    Est imation o f J Based Upon App l ied Strain(e.g ., DNV-OS-F101)

    API Grade 5L X60

  • 8/9/2019 Ruggieri Pipeline Integrity

    34/40

    J vs. Global Response

  • 8/9/2019 Ruggieri Pipeline Integrity

    35/40

    Est imat ion of Maximum Crack

    Driv ing Forces in Pipe Reel ing

  • 8/9/2019 Ruggieri Pipeline Integrity

    36/40

    Lined Pipes

    L ined p ipes cons is t o f a C-Mn p ipe wh ich has a layer o f CRA in con tac t w ith the product ion f lu id and hence, its co rros ive en viro nmen t. The lay er o f Co rro sio n Res is tan t A llo y (CRA ) is applied th ro ug h a mechan ic al b on d b etw een th e CRA and th e C-Mn p ip e.

  • 8/9/2019 Ruggieri Pipeline Integrity

    37/40

    Key Issues

    Wrink le Formation

  • 8/9/2019 Ruggieri Pipeline Integrity

    38/40

    Key Issues

    Fatigue and Fractu re Behavior o f Girth WeldsIncluding Hydrogen Assisted Cracking

  • 8/9/2019 Ruggieri Pipeline Integrity

    39/40

    Summary

    Exploitation and Production of Oil and Gas in

    Ultradeep and Hostile Environment Represent New

    and Difficult Challenges which Impact Directly the

    Safety and Integrity Levels of Pipelines and Risers

    Application of Current FFS Procedures to Newer

    Materials and Complex/Severe Conditions Can Not

    be Made by Simple Ad-HocExtension ofConventional Engineering Methodologies

    Inn ovat ive and Yet More Ration al and ReliableApproaches Mus t Be Developed!

  • 8/9/2019 Ruggieri Pipeline Integrity

    40/40

    Thank you!