____________________________________________________________________

1

SMOOC’ PEDAGOGICAL DESIGN

RUBRIC’S SYSTEM

Here we present the “Rubric’s System” developed ad hoc for this P2P

assessment task: “sMOOC’ pedagogical design”.

This rubric’s system describes various dimensions that you have to consider

during this task. However, you must use the quantitative scale (1-5) to evaluate

other participants report. To clarify, each quantitative score (1-5) is

accompanied by a qualitative description that explains each score meaning,

taking into account every different aspects that make up this assessment task.

In the end of each evaluation dimension (and at the end of the rubric), you will

be able to enlarge this assessment giving your personal opinion about

“strengths and weaknesses” of each report you evaluate. This feedback will be

sent to the author of each report: your notes will help them to reflect about

and improve their own report.

You must evaluate two (2) reports of other participants. The platform will

assign them to you randomly and automatically. When you have completed

both evaluations, you will receive your grade, resulting from the average of

other participants’ assessment.

If you have applied to be part of volunteer evaluators group, the platform could

allocate more evaluations than mandatory assessments (2).

Peer-to-peer assessment tasks are very important. You must evaluate other

participants in a prudent and ethical way because, during this process, you will

qualify (rate) activities developed by them and their progress in this sMOOC.

So, we recommend you read this document carefully and evaluate taking on

account every aspect of this rubric. Be objective and reflexive.

Remember that, to complete this task, you have to send your report and

assess other participants' reports (2).

____________________________________________________________________

2

Rate scale

5

Excellent job!

4

Good! You achieve the

goals of this dimension in

a good way.

3

Acceptable. You achieve

the goals of this

dimension partly.

2

You must improve! You

didn’t achieve the goals

of this dimension.

1

Invalid. You didn’t

consider this dimension

in your report.

Dim

en

sio

ns

JUSTIFICATION

Justification is very detailed,

providing a clear and complete

explanation of the reasons that

motivate the sMOOC designed.

Justification is clear, providing

sufficient explanation of the

reasons that motivate the

sMOOC designed.

Justification has some gaps and

doesn’t provide a full

explanation of the reasons that

motivate the sMOOC designed.

Justification is unclear and

incomplete, and does not allow

identifying the explanation of

the reasons that motivate the

sMOOC designed.

No justification. Non-existent.

GOALS AND

CONTENTS

Goals and contents have been

defined in-depth, and in a clear

and accurate way. The goals are

consistent with the content and

realistic.

Goals and contents have been

defined in a clear and realistic

way. There is some consistency

between goals and content.

Goals and contents have been

defined, but there are some

gaps between goals, contents

and the justification.

The definition of goals and

content is incomplete,

insufficient, confused and

lacking in consistency in relation

to the justification.

Goals and contents have not

been defined. Non-existent.

____________________________________________________________________

3

Rate scale

5

Excellent job!

4

Good! You achieve the

goals of this dimension in

a good way.

3

Acceptable. You achieve

the goals of this

dimension partly.

2

You must improve! You

didn’t achieve the goals

of this dimension.

1

Invalid. You didn’t

consider this dimension

in your report.

Dim

en

sio

ns

ACTIVITIES AND

RESOURCES

Has been defined a wide variety

of activities and resources in

great detail, that offer real

possibilities of goals achieving.

Has been defined a sufficient

variety of activities and

resources that offer real

possibilities of goals achieving.

The definition of the activities

and resources presents some

(qualitative and quantitative)

gaps, and there are some

doubts regarding effectiveness

of them in relation to goals

achieving.

The definition of activities and

resources is incomplete,

insufficient and confused

regarding effectiveness of them

in relation to goals achieving.

Activities and resources have

not been defined. Non-existent.

ASSESSMENT

A complete assessment plan has

been defined in detail for

sMOOC proposed.

An assessment plan has been

defined in detail for sMOOC

proposed.

The assessment plan has some

gaps.

Assessment strategies are not

defined.

No assessment plan has been

defined. Non-existent.