Rubric Lab Report Cc505 Structural Analysis 1 (en Hamizi)
2
RUBRIC FOR ASSESSING LABORATORY CC505 – STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS 1 (LABORATORY WORK) (LAB REPORT ASSESSMENT) Note: Attach this sheet in each lab report and place it after the front page. 4 Excellent 3 Good 2 Fair 1 Unsatisfactory Score Experimental procedure Well-written in paragraph format, all experimental details are covered. Written in paragraph format, important experimental details are covered, some minor details are missing. Written in paragraph format, still missing some important experimental details Missing several important experimental details or not written in paragraph format. /4 Results: Data, figures, graphs, tables,etc All figures, graphs, tables are correctly drawn, are numbered and contain titles/captions. All figures, graphs, tables are correctly drawn, but some have minor problems or could still be improved. Most figures, graphs, tables OK,some still missing some important or required features Figures, graphs, tables contain errors or are poorly constructed, have missing titles, captionnor numbers, units missing or incorrect, etc /4 Observations and calculations Excellent evidence of in- depth observations and all calculations are accurate. Good evidence of observations and most calculations are accurate Some evidence of observations and partly accurate calculations Little evidence of observatios and inaccurate calculations. /4 Discussion All important trends and data comparisons have been interpreted correctly and discussed;good understanding of results is conveyed. All questions have been answered correctly. Almost all the results and questions( if appropriate) have been correctly interpreted and discussed;only minor improveme nt are needed. Some of the results and questions ( if appropriate )have been correctly interpreted and discussed; partial but incomplete understanding of results is still evident Very incomplete or incorrect interpretation of trends and comparison of data indicating a lack of understanding of result /4 Conclusions ( based on the experimental’s objectives ) All important conclusions have been clearly made, student shows good undertanding All imprtant conclusions have been drawn, could be better stated Conclusions regarding major points are drawn, but many are misstated, indicating a lack of understanding Conclusions missing or missing the important points /4 Contribution to grouping Most contributed More contributed Less contribution Little contribution /4 Appearance and formatting All sections in order, well- formatted All section in order, formatting generally good but could still be i mproved. Section in order, formatting is rough but readable Sections out of orders /4 Total Score /28 TOTAL MARKS = total score / 28 x 100% /100
description
CC505 Structure Analysis Rubric Lab Report
Transcript of Rubric Lab Report Cc505 Structural Analysis 1 (en Hamizi)
7/18/2019 Rubric Lab Report Cc505 Structural Analysis 1 (en Hamizi)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/rubric-lab-report-cc505-structural-analysis-1-en-hamizi 1/1
RUBRIC FOR ASSESSING LABORATORY
CC505 – STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS 1 (LABORATORY WORK)
(LAB REPORT ASSESSMENT)
Note: Attach this sheet in each lab report and place it after the front page.4
Excellent3
Good2
Fair1
UnsatisfactoryScore
Experimental procedure Well-written in paragraphformat, all experimentaldetails are covered.
Written in paragraphformat, importantexperimental details are
covered, some minor detailsare missing.
Written in paragraphformat, still missing someimportant experimental
details
Missing several importantexperimental details or notwritten in paragraph format.
/4
Results:Data, figures, graphs,
tables,etc
All figures, graphs, tablesare correctly drawn, arenumbered and containtitles/captions.
All figures, graphs, tablesare correctly drawn, butsome have minor problemsor could still be improved.
Most figures, graphs, tablesOK,some still missing someimportant or requiredfeatures
Figures, graphs, tablescontain errors or are poorlyconstructed, have missingtitles, captionnor numbers,units missing or incorrect,etc
/4
Observations andcalculations
Excellent evidence of in-depth observations and allcalculations are accurate.
Good evidence ofobservations and mostcalculations are accurate
Some evidence ofobservations and partlyaccurate calculations
Little evidence ofobservatios and inaccuratecalculations.
/4
Discussion All important trends anddata comparisons have been
interpreted correctly anddiscussed;goodunderstanding of results isconveyed. All questionshave been answeredcorrectly.
Almost all the results andquestions( if appropriate)
have been correctlyinterpreted anddiscussed;only minorimprovement are needed.
Some of the results andquestions ( if appropriate
)have been correctlyinterpreted and discussed;
partial but incompleteunderstanding of results isstill evident
Very incomplete orincorrect interpretation of
trends and comparison ofdata indicating a lack ofunderstanding of result
/4
Conclusions ( based on theexperimental’s objectives )
All important conclusionshave been clearly made,student shows goodundertanding
All imprtant conclusionshave been drawn, could be
better stated
Conclusions regardingmajor points are drawn, butmany are misstated,indicating a lack ofunderstanding
Conclusions missing ormissing the important
points
/4
Contribution to grouping Most contributed More contributed Less contribution Little contribution /4
Appearance and formatting All sections in order, well-
formatted
All section in order,
formatting generally good but could still be improved.
Section in order, formatting
is rough but readable
Sections out of orders /4
Total Score /28
TOTAL MARKS = total score / 28 x 100%/100
