Rubric ForPT Rescue Machines2013
Transcript of Rubric ForPT Rescue Machines2013
-
7/29/2019 Rubric ForPT Rescue Machines2013
1/2
8.2 Performance Task Rubric: Rescue Mission Machine Name:______________________________
Group Members: ________________ ,________________ ,________________ ,________________ ,________________
CriteriaLevel of Proficiency
100% 88% 76% 64% 0Exemplary Proficient Developing Emerging Insuffici
entEvidence
Diagram andExplanation
A. Design
1. Labeled drawingof the design(appearance) andmaterials to beused
2.Neat andorganizedpresentation
10 pts
TDS:Communicatio
n
- Has used appropriatetechniques to providean accurate drawing ofthe machine
- Includes accurate
labels for all forces anddistances
- Drawings and textshow well balanceddesign; layout veryeasy to read
- Has used mostlyappropriatetechniques to providean accurate drawingof the machine
- Incudes labels forforces and distanceswith few inaccuracies
-Drawings and textshow balanceddesign; layout mostlyeasy to read
- Has used someappropriate techniquesto provide an accuratedrawing of themachine
-Incudes labels forforces and distanceswith severalinaccuracies
-Drawings and textshow somewhatbalanced design;layout makes itsomewhat difficult toread
- Has used fewtechniques toprovide an accuratedrawing of themachine
-Attempts to labelforces and/ordistances
-Drawings and textunbalanced; layoutmakes it verydifficult to read
B. Science20 pts
(Content)
Explains how themachine provides amechanicaladvantage
- Very detailedexplanation of thedevice used to movethe supplies and
supports withcalculations of workand power mechanicaladvantage
- Satisfactoryexplanation of deviceused with some detailand supports with
calculations of work,power, andmechanical advantage
- Basic explanation ofdevice used withlimited detail andlittle/inaccurate
support withcalculations of work,power, and mechanicaladvantage
- Explanation ofdevice is incompleteand lacks supportingcalculations
-
7/29/2019 Rubric ForPT Rescue Machines2013
2/2
(Have I includedcalculations forwork, power, andmechanicaladvantage?)
CriteriaLevel of Proficiency
100% 88% 76% 64% 0Exemplary Proficient Developing Emerging Insuffici
entEvidence
Device
A.Construction
1. Individual
5 ptsTDS: CriticalThinking and
Problemsolving
2. Group
5 ptsTDS:
Collaboration
Device is perfectly built
and completes tasksuccessfully
All team membersparticipate in decision-making, problem-
solving andconstruction
Device is built and
mostly completestask
Most team membersparticipate indecision-making,
problem-solving andconstruction
Device completes the
task successfully butbreaks down aftertesting
Some team membersinvolved in decision-making, problem-
solving and/orconstruction
Device is built and
partially completesthe task
Most of the workand decision-makingis done by a few.