RR303301 - semspub.epa.gov

ATTACHMENT VSUPPORT DOCUMENTATION

RR303301

r

iii

i.vA.i.»t*on oi hetala Data for theContract Laboratory Program Dace: Dec. 19SBAppendix A.5: Summary of Inorganics Nuober: HW-2Quality Control Data Revision: 8

UJOUTOM!UjeS>-fev> CAMfcG.^M^.* —— -~ -,0n - -, , -v———Tv 7?p """ "«^>lfe^rj;^

FIELD W?. 5:______________ 00? . M«U lUafc"~"———— ' a*————— MATtlX Stirr J.

$E»LAL DILUTION SAMPLE no. 55 T-

=WK. Stdj Calibration

flR303302

Evaluation of Metal. DaVa~ for the""Contract Laboratory Prograa - Date: Dec. 1953Appendix A.5: $unMrr of inorganic* Nuobtr: RU-2*Quality Control Data Revision: R• » ™

riEia wjp. rs.SOLIAL DIICTIOH SAKFU HO. tfrfU

II___I____ IIfDcctctloo

AR303303

I

Evaluation o£ Metals Data for the Dat.. r^Contract Laboratory Program Number- uAppendix A.5: Suamary of Inorganic* *.vi«<«. .Quality Control Data "^vision. 8

or iHotCAjncs onum eoimo!. amCASE KS, <JJKJ*T sou »o. f „ _„_

C/fefeE MOS:

lUnkOCP. ,,,.

AM-•tcrr

DllCTIOK SJUfPU HO.__________ COffUTIOK DAg:?'A ttTirVIP IKITlALS-II I _____IIA____ 111 III ——

Dtttctiee1 ] C^Ub. t«>. ,C1D St*|

Sb

Al

c*Cr

Ca

Cu

r*

to

Ki

S*

Af

Hi

Tl

CT

200

60

10

200

5000

10

50

25

100

500D

15

0.2

40

5000

10

5000

10

50

20

ZO

Y

•L

10

LialtJ )?i«lrf 1 O l7tr. I Itsa |M«ftk I { Concinutd

Unit 1 2__3 jtalt ftr

*-

?7.7

If.'

711#•

Si.

f-H

pio

*

Calibritlan11 mil

1 Conttnu«dInit 1 2 3

A"

*?•

I LI Ar N

icr icsZ 1

Imit Ptn

fy.C

ft-"

V.I

W.o

« st pr iv k

1,0

9*.'

#.3

ill

UbDup

1PD

US

i tDil

i n

W

to.T

1M

« i

f

L

cvf •^i

/*:

-- --».. ^*t* ior tneContract Laboratory Program °*teAppendix A. 5: Suamary ef Inorganic, Nu»b«rQuality Control Data *«vtii

o«c, I98g

*«vtiioR:

DILUTION SAKPU NOn i " 1 1 A

flR303305

uor.tr*cc Laboratory Program " D-ce: o«c. 19SSrE!??;1*/'5' ,$u»«ry of Inorganic. *»b«r: KV-2Quality Control Data *«vi«ion: g

fiR303306

xor the I9SSContract Laboratory Program Nunb«r: KW-1Appendix A. 5.* Summary of Inorganics Revision* 8Quality Control Data

_SUMMAJT Or IMQKCAEICS QUALITT COmOL DATA _____ •

CASE 1.0. <TfX>64 SW TO,. -7SH tWffU TTPt: w .' • lj" ' V" *

SAMPLE MOS:

M«ld _._ ____________FICL& DUP* *'$:_____ LAJ DCP, **S: <&Tll f-l Juftil SPjfe f"

SE1UL DILUTION SAKFU NO.__________ COCPUTIOK PAttr?- ft'lo IZHEVtZS INITIALS-XI_____I_______HA_____ II»______ in

:«:;DtttetlooT

Ten; i ;i3L'.Al

Sb

At

la

Ie

Cd

Cr

Co

C«

F«

Pfe

Ml

Ka

t|

NI

f

St

Af

*.

Tl

f

IB

CN

200

60

10

200

5

5

5000

10

50

25

100

5

5000

15

0.2

40

SOOO

5

10

5000

10

50

20

10

*/

^

2.

4-1•Jtot

Y£fjd•>>?*•«.*iin2-5If/.5J

^

10

Piclrf » Vfr. X 1

Init 1 2 3

^

00'*

1l-1

f '

Jtf.f

Inlt

p}33

fin

Calibration

CootiflutdInit 1 2 3

P •I LE AF N

ICF ICSX I

Init Tin

K S« Pr iz k

Ub

tpnU.i

72

i,y|

IKP,,,7

/.*1 aIf*'1wK.f?.S

^

p?J.

«•/

?W

.?.f

7,r.r

LCS51 1

? ^

StrDii

X Deh

P^P^^ .rfif*frf^ *r f^ iCVrrpi0.r*^if& '/\

fiR303307

TJLsle: Evaluation of Metal* Data for the Dace: D*c. 19S8Contract Laboratory Program Number: *HW-2Appendix A*5: Sunoarr of Inorganiet Revision: gQuality Control Data

OF moiCAiaCS QUALITY COmPl DATA ______

lAlOKATOKt:VUSfev% C*St fcO. <7l>C-* SOU H0,_"?9") SwffLE TYPE:

im/STL'DY PrSCRimSV: fltjTfl-PT} fog SAKPU MOS:

tttld llaok______________FIEUJ DU?. *'$:________________ LU OCT. *'S: ——BAtllX Mft I:

JttlAL DILtTIOK SAXfU MO.__________ COKPUT10K DAW:7->J'fc KZTIEVZtS IWITULS-IT___i_____m____in___ in —'— iv »

P*r»-m*ttc r*"AIfkAt

tl

ft

C4

C*

Cr

Ce

Cu

Ft

Vk

HC

Kfl

If

Hi

K

S*

ACHa

Tl

?

£•

CT

OcttetioaLi»iurs/i

CRDL ;200

60

SO

200

5

5

5000

10

50

25

100

5

5000

IS

0.2

40

5000

S

10

5000

10

50

20

10

IX

*t>£z.6-l"J66•L

Y*?Iff3

v•z.,j *clt^

-77fiz_5

Vf^^10

Fi«UUnk i

Calib. V«r. ,-lDi. St<9 IV, r. I 1Concinutd

Init 1 2 3

W ^'&

lalt

%,1

?iti

C«libr»tloBllftBksCootioutd

laic X 2 3

P 1ft II AP K

1C? ICSz t

I a itm

K St *T ix k

UbDup

IFO

ICS\A>Z »

*<-»•">^ot

qs-i«*'ti 1^<?7.c

^?7.ir

<#S

Wi.7^*a^

KV.fc

|rf,5

^7

^

K °

1^

»/*

StrDil

I T>

Ktth

ffPr?,(fff—rfff-f?v,vrrrfffffr,

flR303308

Tie!*: Evaluation of M«tala Data for the Dar*-_ * , _ w«ve-Contract Laboratory Program _ Number: HW-2Appendix A.5: Suomary of Inorganic* Ktvtilon* 8Quality Control Data

or iMotCAHics QUALITY comoi OATA1.0, SW «0._*7g-> U«FLt TTFt:

ov: .S7PiifjTaft 7> Gffefo SAKFLE

BlankPUP. I'S:______________ LU DCF. *<S:___________ mfttl S»ift I:

SC1UL DILUTION SAKFU MO.__________ CGKFUTIOK DAg;7-#-?P 0TIZVCIS INITIALS-UA_______ 111______ I I I ' -

F«r«-••err

*A1

Sb

At

1*

1« \

Cd

CM

Cr

Co

Cu

Ft

Fb

H<

Ha

Hi

HI

cSt

At

*•

Tl

f

IB

CM

D«ctctio&jLimit*rs.a

ot: ,200

60

10

200

5 '

5

5000

10

50

25

100

5

5000

15

0.2

40

5000

5

10

5000

10

50

20

10

I:L*t

l>t>Z.

<9-

1

1

kb

^

i$ff3

^-i

<?.2*

-?

7flZ-?

*//-)^

10

Fi«Ulink

Calib. V«r. 'BConcinutd

lait 1 2 3

^#&3

CXDi. St4Vtr. Z I

Init Ftn

Ullbractoe11 ask*Coatiau«4

laic 1 2 3

P •t Lt AF r

1CF ICSZ 1

laic ria

H St Fr 1x k

UbDup

IFO

LCS

: i

S*rDil

I D

K•th

f^Prr-IfrfffPf7f^ ic\/f •f'<ffrf\ff:ft

AR3

j.v&...*•..or. oi htL»A* uACa ror the Date* D«c '988Contract Laboratory Program Number: *HW-2Appendix A.5: Summary of Inorjanici Revliion- 8Quality Control Data

-SWU>T OF IMOKCAKICS QUALITY COmot DATA

s. <TTI>(14 s» *o.SITt/SKDY &r5CRmiOV: J; ;T>l C/fefag SAKP' E NOS:

FIEli WJ?. *'S:______________ Ul DUP. *'$:__________^ aAflttl SPlfc J:

StKUL DILUTION SAMPLE K>. COKFUtTZOK DAlE : 7 /# "7<7 UTICVE13 IXITLALS- J>\ ~-XI I IIA 111 in T? f ^T VT^ — *f ———

iD*c«etiea!Fart- LiBicj {«c«r* TTG/L (

AS

Ifc

Ai

li

»«

C4

Cj

Cr

Co

Cu

F*

Ffc

K|

Ka

1C

Hi

ts*AI«4Tl

t

Zm

CM

CRS^

200

60

10

200

5

5

5000

10

50

25

100

5

sooo15

0,2

40

5000

5

10

5000

10

SO

20

10

t£L

*f

>2Z.

4mI1^^

Yv^

fjlj

5

fs'vt.<5,L-7

72_5f//^£10

SS »ConciDutd

Inlt 1 2 3

(

— —

nat St.* C*librttionVtr. Z t llteks

laic Pin Inlt 1 2 3

P 1t LC A

1CP 1CSX t

Islt Fin

H S

r iz k

UbDup LCS

Z t

StrDtl

Z T)

H

th

f<?P^\f .fIf

f

f'l^p ;^f^C\lff '•p^^F:&£> '

r.

flR303310

~*:.e.Contract Laboratory Prograa .Apptndix A.5: Suanury of Inorganic! Kuaber: HW-2Quality Control Data Revision: $

SA«LE ««Oai_ j£ c

SUtUL DILUTION SAK7U NO.i IIA

P«r»- UaitJ»«c*r CS/l

flft3033!l

Contract Laboratory ProgramAppendix A.5: Susoarr of Inorganic! t<Quality Control Data ^vision: 8

or moKCAHics QUALITY comoLcm M.

«n/fWDY MiCKimtw; S/ ylW7?) C'fljfag SAMFLC

$auL CIUJTIOK SAK?U no. cttffucTiOK OA«:7-/3f' o cmcvits IVXTZAU* D*« * T*A «» in if ? ?! vTr w —

Part-'•ec*r'

h-1 »i ——* As

\-*-I«

C4

'„?•| Cr

Uo

1 Cu

Fi

Fk

Kt

Kn

,fVI

t

St

AE

M<

Tl

»

t»

CH

D«c*etioBLlBitJtC/L

CkDL :

200

60

10

200

5

5

5000

10

50

25

200

5

5000

15

0.2

to5000

5

10

sooo10

50

20

10

ir.*/>J-z.6-t!>sb^

Y^Yf^9*-i.t,l7~7fiZ-5

V/*i610

7i*UU«»k

•

Calib. V«r. ;» f

j Continued 1lalt 1 2 3 !

4.1

OLDt Si4l Ulibritica —7tr. X II IUnt«

laic Fin'1 Continued

lelc 1 2 3

r •S LC AF M

1C? 1CSX t

lull Fin

Tst Fr i< k

UbOup

IFO

LCS

X 1

S«tDtl

t T»

K«th

f9t-t?:

f

f

ff\

^

t\f !

f !^ •

rwr •r;fff-F;

t

f'r.

flR3033!2

, SHEET___ofCUENT/SUBJECT 'TASK DESCRIPTIONPRFPARFHRV

MATH CHECK BYMETHOD RFV BY

^ —> ' * * -*

nFPTDFPTDFPT

s*~*\ •>

HATPHATFDATP

/ \ , - -

WO NO

TASIC NO

APPROVED BY

DFPT , . DATF

' -'j/o' *£&

a

Si*-

flR3033!3

SHEET___of.

TASK INSCRIPTIONPRFPARFD BYMATH OHFOK BYMFTHOn RFV BY

HFPTDFPT

TASK W

HATF

HATF

HATF

41APPROVED BY |

nPPT „ RATF

\l .&$ ko*' be.

fcpwio-os-oos/A-s/as

\J

M/ o

^=> c A A 3' i^^ ^ ^ V"

u f=...f7 ^ ?y.-77 ^ ^ 3 7^ f/. /^ Cci/ 1C,/(py 7,3

AR3033U

SHEET———of,CLIENT/SUBJECT _____________________________________ W.O. NO.TASK DESCRIPTIONPREPAREDMATH CHECMETHOD REV. BY

TION .. -. ., - - - ...nFPT

iv nFPTRV HFPT

TASIf MO

HATF

nATF

APPROVED BY

HFPT DATE

BFW 10-05-003M-5/85flR3033i5

SHEET___0<f >• T~'

WILrliPMT/SlJRJECT-——————————————————————————————————————— W.O. NO————————————j frs CLIENT/SUBJECT'* *" TASK DESCRIPTION —————————————————-———————•————————————— TASK NO

PREPARED BY _MATH CHECK BY.METHOD REV. BY

/ <#&¥

flR3033i6

STANDARD CHLORINESDG JTRC127

DATA REVIEWER: Douglas GodfreyDATA SUPERVISOR: Zohreh Hamid, Ph.D.

The laboratory's portion of SDG #TRC127 consisted of five samples(one water and four soils) analyzed for TAL metals by Roy F.Weston, Inc.

The laboratory reported no -problems with the receipt and analysis.of rhe samples received on 01-11-90.

The reviewer has commented on the criteria specified under eachanalysis heading method. All criteria has been assessed, but nodiscussion is given where the evaluator has determined thatcriteria were adequately performed or require no comment. A listof samples with criteria deficiencies and qualifier codes issummarized in Table I. A glossary of qualifier codes is presentedin Attachment I. Amounts of detected analytes are summarized inAttachment II.

flR3033!7

INORGANIC DATA REVIEWSTANDARD CHLORINESDG #TRC127PAGE 2 OF 8

EVALUATION BY ANALYSIS

I. ICP Analysis

Initial CalibrationContinuing CalibrationInterference CheckMatrix SpikeDuplIcateLaboratory Control SampleBlanks --_Preparation BlankSerial DilutionCRI

The water matrix spike percent recovery for Sb (44.0%) was belowthe CLP control limit. All associated sample results are qualifiedas estimated and considered to be biased low.

The soil matrix spike percent recoveries for Sb (20.2%), Cr(68.6%), Mn (64.2%), Ag (34.1%), V (74.6%) were below the CLPcontrol limit. All associated sample results are qualified asqualified as estimated and considered to be biased low.

The soil duplicate digestion relative percent differences (RPD) forCr (35.5), Mn (29.4), and Ag (121.1) were above the CLP controllimit. All associated sample results are qualified as estimated.

The soil serial dilution percent difference for Mn (27.4%) wasabove the CLP control limit. All associated sample results >lOxIDL are qualified as estimated.

The CRDL sample percent recoveries for Sb and Ag were below the CLPcontrol limit. All associated sample results between the ± CRDLare qualified as estimated.

The CRDL sample percent recovery for Zn was above the CLP controllimits. All associated positive sample results <CRDL are qualifiedas estimated.

The laboratory control sample (LCS) percent recovery for Ag wasbelow the CLP control limit. All associated sample results arequalified as estimated.

flR3033i8


EVALUATION BY ANALYSIS

II- Graphite Furnace Analysis _ ... ri.

___ Initial Calibration___ Continuing Calibrationx Matrix Spike .___ Duplicate___Laboratory Control Sample___ Blanks ...... _ — -—— -___ Analytical Spiking, MSAx CRA ... . ... ;- - . _ . . " . . - .

The soil matrix spike percent recoveries for As (62.3%), Pb(74.2%), and Se (41.7%) were below the CLP control limit. Allassociated sample results are qualified as estimated and consideredto be biased low.

The CRA sample percent recovery for Tl was below the CLP controllimits. All associated sample results between the ± CRDL arequalified as estimated.

flR3033i9


III. Mercury and Cyanide

Initial CalibrationContinuing CalibrationMatrix SpikeDuplicateLaboratory Control SampleBlanksHolding Time

. Matrix spike and duplicate digestion samples were not prepared for] the soil samples for Hg. All associated sample results are* qualified as

AR303320


TABLE I

Sample # Analyte + Results - QL Comments*

All Soil Samples Sfo,Cr,Mn,Ag,V,As,Pb,Se J UJ- 1

SB-113 Sb J UJ 1

All Soil Samples Cr,Mn,Ag J UJ 2

All Soil Samples , ; Mn J UJ 3

All Soil Samples Sb,Tl J UJ 4

SB-114 .... --• Ag J : UJ 4

SB-113 Zn J — 5

All Samples - Hg J UJ 6

All Soil Samples Ag J " " uj 7

* Comments for Table I are listed on the proceeding page.

J3R30332I


1. Due to a low matrix spike percent recovery, indicating amatrix interference or laboratory specific problem/ allassociated sample results are qualified as estimated andare considered to be biased low.

2. Due to a high duplicate digestion RPD, all associatedsample results are qualified as estimated.

3. Due to a high serial dilution percent difference, allassociated sample results >10x the IDL are qualified asestimated.

4. Due to a low CRDL sample percent recovery, all associatedsample results between the ± CRDL are qualified asestimated.

5. Due to a high CRDL sample percent recovery, allassociated positive sample results between the IDL andCRDL are qualified as estimated.

6. No matrix spike or duplicate samples were prepared forthis SDG. All associated sample results are qualified asestimated.

7. Due to a low LCS percent recovery, indicating possiblelaboratory specific problems, all associated sampleresults are qualified as estimated.

BR303322


GENERAL NOTES

1. The wrong client was listed on the cover letter. Thecorrect cover letter is enclosed.

2. Forms do not match the raw data. Corrected formsmatching the raw data is enclosed.

flR3G3323

II

[I

INORGANIC DATA REVIEWSTANDARD CHLORINESDG ITRC127PAGE 8 OF 8

INFORMATION REGARDING REPORT CONTENT

All data have been validated with regard to usability according toCLP Guidelines. If you have any questions or comments on this datareview, please call Zohreh Hamid at (215)524-7360.

INORGANIC ATTACHMENTS

1. Attachment I - Glossary of Data Qualifier Codes.

2. Attachment II - Data Summary. This includes:

All positive results with qualifier codes if applicable;all estimated detection limits qualified with "UJ".

3. Attachment III - Data Validation Form for Inorganic(Metals and Cyanide).

4. Attachment IV - DPO Report - This addresses laboratorycompliance issues with respect to the Statement of Work.

5. Attachment V - Support Documentation.

AR303321*

ATTACHMENT IGLOSSARY OF DATA QUALIFIERS

RR303325

GLOSSARY OF DATA QUALIFIERS

COPES RELATING TO IDENTIFICATION

(confidence concerning presence or absence of compounds)

0 m NOT DETECTED, SUBSTANTIALLY ABOVE THE LEVELREPORTED IN LABORATORY OR FIELD BLANKS.

R - UNRELIABLE RESULT. ANALYTE MAY OR MAY NOT BEPRESENT IN THE SAMPLE. SUPPORTING DATANECESSARY TO CONFIRM RESULT.

N - NEGATED COMPOUND WAS CONSIDERED AS NOTPRESENT IN THE SAMPLE.

(NO CODE) * CONFIRMED IDENTIFICATION

CODES RELATING TO QUANTITATION

(can be used for both positive results and sample guantitationlimits):

J ^ ANALYTE PRESENT. .REPORTED VALUE MAY NOT BEACCURATE OR PRECISE.

0J ~ THE REPORTED QUANTITATION LIMITS AREQUALIFIED ESTIMATED.

OTHER CODES

Q NO ANALYTICAL RESULT.

AR3Q3326

ATTACHMENT XIDATA SUMMARY

flR303327

niNi-ci-*>-<|yilw'ifll7t! ™ ! f > *• i ? < 5 i •" * * <ois 13 *3 '* l a i »* l r * «*"

sl'ill Irifi iiil* « « 'i.iLi-i_i_7~7~7~7~7~7""7~7Us-M ! fcK ^pp| S rt^k-i «°>i^JiO! *i i i ii |- ,ii Mi

bb!r* bi ! i

-o

I 5 l!1 t*-S-.

1

r

I1 *' i £.1I I i" -li i i i

oo

1 I 1

i

i i iI t-s Ii ii

ii!iiliiiliiitfiiii

IT

it: '

I

Ol

21? ?>? £!•» if i f if f r i10.1* l5 '« I W *? "S *i IS!i!S ! J !• i i

l t -i l » C «1 1 i

-

' i i ii^r-i i

so

DCO

0

Oo

O

^

i)

?s:e

Ii1 — — — — — ' —

u = Contra

itIrr

rr

t§r<

mX -

5

fti

i

?CJ,

1

g

j

1

-'

dV

3

5-4r

i

V)a»•f

i

a

i:

IR

i

01

jff3»•

o

0

M•

i

a:

*«zM

1

5.3

p

sf0C

C

2.

•*a

s

'

9

if|

0

*rI

§ssni o

i*

5*n

w

neI

a*nii

01

Is

111' t

I

iS*

Ios

j

Ii

» 1III-ii a r£ "2 fii n s nr » r »3 IK f»£ M^ «^Inn oH 5nitiinMIIIIIIIIIIflIIIIIIII11

IIII

ItttIIIIIIII11

IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIfII11IIIIII11IIJlMIIIIMMIIII11Ntt11

IIII

11nniiuitnnMMHtinnnnli11niiiiMIIIIII

11II

IIIInnntinM t

-II

II

Jl

H• ::f8• n* 1*£»!!HIfMII1!IIIIItIIIIII

MHIIIIIIHIIftIIIIIIItMIIIIMH

UIIIIII

UII

II

ii rno— ii inu £112liftIK11M Oj| JQ

!!o"»'Sii mit

II Dnmn "flM-il ZM -<

HOII $IIMIIIIII11It

IIIIIIMItIIIIIIMtl

s> tr-9 t

I §

ktsTTtr~

SpP1tt

•

£** (.1?p

ViQ

* 0Fa^ **11JTj

f*S§0 f»

"I•

5

II

IP

j £

i

nIT

v

IIi

0

ATTACHMENT IIICLP DATA REVIEW FORK

AR3Q333Q

t>*._*:i=r. c: :*.«- Lac* lor tr.t " Date: DeCiContract Laboratory Program Number: HV-2Appendix A.I: Data Assessment - Contract Revision- RCompliance (Total Review - Inorganics)

A."-- ^o—ract C'c:-:..i--* 5-r*£-in£ Re?r~: (CCS1 - Present? r __ V

A.1.2 Record of Cocsur.ication (from RSCC) - Present?

ACTION: If nc. request from RSCC.

A.1.3 Simple Traffic Report - Present or on file?

^. ACTION*: If no, request froa Regional Saople ControlCenter (RSCC).

A.1.4 Cover Pafe - Present?

!• cover page properly filled in and signed by themanager or the manager's designee?

ACTION: If no, prepare Telephone Record Log, andcontact laboratory.

Do numbers of samples correspond to numbers on Recordof Communication? [ V ]

Do sample numbers on cover page agree vith samplenuabers on:

(a) Traffic Report Sheet? [ )(}

(b) Form Irs?

ACTION: If no for any of the above, contact RSCC forclarification.

A, 1.5 Form I (Tinal Patjj. - Are all Form Ifs present and complete? [X] __

ACTION: If no, prepare telephone record log and contactlaboratory for submit tal.

Are correct units (ug/1 for waters and «g/kg for soils)indicated on Fora !'•?

Evaluation of Metals Data for Che Date: Dec. 198SContract Laboratory Program Number: KW-2Appendix A.l; Data Assessment .- Cone race- Revision: 6Coepliance (Total Review - Inorganics)

Are *oi * »amrl- r«**clts for each parameter corrected forpercent voii'cif* * [ Xl

Are EPA $amr*e * » and corresponding laboratory sampleID f s the same as on the Cover Page, Fora 1's andIn the raw data? [ X ]

Are computation/transcription errors leas than 10Jof reported values? [ y ]

Are all "less than IDi" values properly coded with "C"? [ V ]

Was a brief physical description of samples given onFora I's?

Were the result qualifiers used correctly with final

ACTION: If no for any of the above, prepare TelephoneRecord Log, and contract laboratory forcorrected data.

Were any samples diluted beyond requirements of contract? __ [ ]— ~^rIf yes, were dilutions acted on Fora Ifs? [ __ ] __——ACT I OK: If no, note under contract -problem/non-compliance

of the"Data Assessment Narrative".

A. 1.6 Holding Tines - (aqueous sanples )

(Examine saaple traffic reports and digestion/distillation logs*)

Mercury (28 days). ........ exceeded? __ [ V]

Cyanide (14 days). ........ exceeded? [ / ]- —~T~ -j-\Other Metals (6 aonths). ..... exceeded? __ [ Xl

Soil samples

Metals and Cyanide (6 aonths). .... .exceeded? ___ I A )

WOTS: Prepare a list of all samples and analyttsfor which holding tiaes have been exceeded. Specifythe number of days from date of collection to thedate of analysis (from rav data). Attach to checklist.

AR303332

TiCie: Evaluation of Metal* for; the Contract Date: Dec. 19ELaboratory Program Number; HV-2Appendix A.I: Data Aasessaent - Contract Revision: gCompliance (Total Review - Inorganics)

If y*t . rtj*:t ,"rei-line) values less thaIrstruz*r.t Detection Limit (IDL); flag asestimated (J) che values above IDL.

A.I. 7 Kaw Data

YES

A. 1.7*1 Digestion Log* for flameAA/ICP present? [

Digestion Log for furnace AA present? [

Digestion Log for oercury present? [

Digestion Log for cyanides present?

Are pH values (pH<2 for all oetals, pH>12 for cyanide)present in Digestion/Distillation Logs?

*Veights» dilutions and volumes used to obtain values.

Percent solids calculation present for toils/sediments? [ __ ]

Are preparation dates present on Digestion Log? [

A. 1.7. 2 Measureoent read out record present? ICP

Flane AA [ / }

--- - Furnace AA ^ _ ]

Mercury IV ]

Cyanides

A. 1.7*3 Are all raw data to support all sample analyses andQC operations present? [ X ]

Legible? [ -V ]

Properly Labeled? [

ACTION': If no for any of the above, write TelephoneRecord Log and contact laboratory.

I3R3G3333

Title: Evaluation of Metals Data for the Data: Aug.Contract Laboratory Prograa Nuobtr: HW-2Appendix A.I: Data Assessment - Contract Revision: 8"Coopliance (Total Review - Inorganics)

YES N2

A* * • ? 2-:.''r- \"-~-'-'**• ~~r a — V€r-* Itstvcr*

A.:.8.1 Calibration

A. 1.8.1.1 Is record of at least 2 point: calibrationpresent for ICP analysis?

Is record of 5 point calibration present forHg analysis?

ACTION': If no for any of the above, vrite in thecontract probleo/non-coapliance section ofthe "Data Assessment Narrative"*

A.1.6.1.2 Is record of 4 point calibration present for:Flaoe A>? [__]

Furnace AA? [ X?

Cyanides? [ V)

NOT£: 1. If less than 4, other standards oust be run iotoediatelyafter calibration and be j* 5t of true value.

2. for all AA and Cyanide analyses one calibration standardis at CRDL level.

ACTION: Flag associated data as estimated if standardsare not vithin j*5t of true values (except CRDLcalibration standard).

A.1.8.1.3 Is correlation coefficient less than 0.995 for:

Mercury Analyiis? __

Cyanide Analyiis? __ I 1

Atomic Absorption Analyiis? __ [ v 1

ACTION: If yes, flag the associated data as estiaated.

A.1.8.2 Forffi II A (Initial and Continuing Calibration Verification)*

A.1.6.2.1 Present and complete for every aetal and cyanide? [ _jjj] __

AR30333U

- - - - - Dec. 19SHContract Laboratory Program ' Number: HW-2Appendix A.I: Data Assessaent - Contract Revision: 8Compliance (Total Review » Inorganics)

YES KOPresent A«C* c •>*?>.':* f*r AA A.-.ti TCt when bo:* are —used for saoc a.-.aiyrt* [__j

ACT!ff>- I: r^ *->r sr.y of the above, prtpare TelephoneRecord Log and contact laboratory.

A.1.8.2.2 Circle all values on data summary sheet that areoutside of contract windows. Are all calibrationstandards (initial and continuing) within controllimits?

Metals 90-1102 [ £ ] __

Hg - 80-1202 [ y ] __

-* Cyanides 85-1152 [ v] __

Are all calibration standards (initial and continuing)within 50-1502?

ACTION: Flag as estimated (J) all positive data (notflagged with a "U") analyzed between acalibration standard of 75-892 (65-792 for Hg;70-842 for CN) or 111-1252 (121-1352 for Hg;116-1302 for CN) recovery and nearest good calibrationstandard. Qualify results <IDL as estimated (UJ),if the ICV or CCV 2R is 75-892(CN, 70-842 ; HG, 65-792).Reject (red-line) as unacceptable data if recovery ofthe ICV or CCV IR is outside the range 75-1252(CN, 70-1302; flg, 65-1352).

Was continuing calibration performed every 10 samplesor every 2 hours? [ *y }

ACTIOS: If no, flag the excess samples (eleventh andup) data as estimated (J).

A.1.8.3 Fora II B (CRDt Standards for AA and ICP) -

A.1.8.3.1 Was a CRDL standard (CRA) analyzed for all AA metals(except Hg)?

* Was a mid-range calib. verification standard distilledand analyzed for cyanide analysis? ( X )

Was a 2xCRBL or 2xIDL (when IDL>CRDL) analyzed (CRI) foreach ICP run? { yf ](Note: CRI for AL,Ba.Ca.Fe.Mg,Na,or K is not required.)

* Find the results of mid-range standard in the raw data.

&R3Q3335

Contract Laboratory Program Number: HV-2Appendix A.I: Data Assessment - Contract Revision: 8Compliance (Total Review - Inorganics)

ACTION: If no foT any of the above, flag as estimated YES KO 5'Ap«f-;:ive rfata falling within the range ——

*\tra*! VS.I-.T j- 0?" '. Tor CK, rr-> ranpe is* ' -„ ru« v.-"; .,c ^ ". ; v - rue va 1 ue >.

A. 1.8*3.2 Va* ."-" *"*t7?vt" ar'ttfT ICV/ ICB ar.d be-fore the iir.ElCCV r.C5, or <very four hours of ICP run? [ X] __

ACTION: If no, write in Contract Problem/Non-ComplianceSection of the "Data Assessment Narrative".

A.:.8.3.3 Are CRA and CRI standards within^ontrol limits: _

Metals 90 - 110? [__]

Is mid-range standard within control limits:

Cyanide 85 - 115? (X ]

ACTION: Flag the affected data within the range*(true value + CRDL) as estimated (J) if recoveryis less than 901 (for CN <85Z); flag the positivedata within the range (true value CRDL), ifrecovery is greater than 110* (for~~CN M15J).The range for CN is *(true value 0.5 x true value).

| ^^ A.1.8.A Fore III (Initial and Continuing Calibration Blanks)

A.1.8.6.1 Present and complete? l^X]

For both AA and ICP when both are used for same analyte? [__]

ACTION: If no, prepare Telephone Record Log andcontact laboratory.

A.1.8.4.2 Circle all calibration blank values on Data Summary Sheetthat are above IDL. Are all calibration blanks(when IDL<CRDL) less than or equal to Contract RequiredDetection Limits (CRDL)? I X 1

Are all calibration blanks less than two timesInstrument Detection Limit (when IDLXRDL)? [__)

ACTION: If no for any of the above, flag as estimated (J)on form I's all data <5xIDL between calibrationblank with value over CRDL or IDL and nearestgood calibration blank. Flag five samples on eitherside of the calibration blank.

* -True value of CRA, CRI or mid-range CN standard.-Substitute IDL for CRDL when IDL > CRDL.

flR303336

Tiile:- Evaluation of Met*l« Data for the Date: Dec. 19a»Contract _Labor*tory Program Number: "HV-2~Appendix 'A.-lr Data Assessment - Contract Revision: 8Compliance (Total' Review '- Inorganics)

YES NO

A.I.t.4.3 fc'is ar. initial" Ubratio- blan* a.na'.yzed'* l\/ 5

Vaf * :2r.tisulrv£ csltbtailsr. bl&r\V. tr.alyzed »£*trtvcry 10 samples or every 2 hours (whichever is morefrequent)?

ACTION: If no, flag af estimated (J) all values <5xIDLnot analyzed within 5 samples of calibration blank,

A.1*8.5 TVtei III (Preparation Blank)—

( Note: The preparation blank for aercury is the same*•*• as the calibration blank.)

A.1.8.5.1 Was one prep, blank analyzed for: each 20 samples? [ y ]

each batch? IX 1

each uatrix type? I.jjTl

both AA and TCP when both are used for same analyte? [__]

ACTION: If no for any of the above, flag as estimated (J)all associated positive data <10 x IDLs for whichprep.blank was not analyzed.

NOTE: If only one blank was analyzed for »orethan 20 saaples, then first 20 samples analyzeddo not have to be flagged as estimated (J).

A.KS.5.2 Do concentrations of prep, blank fall below two timesIDL when IDL is greater than CRDL? . [__]

ACTION: If no» reject (red-line) all data that hasa concentration less than 10 times the prep.blank value, but not flagged with a "U"(less than).

A.1*8.5.3 Is concentration of prep* blank greater than CRDLwhen IDL is less than or equal to CKDL? __ _

If yes, is the concentration of the sample with theleast concentrated analyte less than 10 times theprep, blink value? __ [__] _,

SB303337

.e; Evaluation of Metals Data for the Date: Dec.Contract Laboratory Program Number: RAppendix A.I: Data Assessment - Contract Revision: *Compliance (Total Review - Inorganics)

YES ' jc

ACTION: If vest, reject (red-line) all Associatedd •-•••» t'-.a; has a ccncentratiar. less char.»er; times the prep, blank value, but notflagged with a "U" (less than).

A. 1.8.5,4 Is concentration of prep, blank below the negative CRDL? __

ACTION: If yes, reject (red-line) all associated datathat has a concentration less than lOxCRDL.

A. 1*8.6 Forts IV (1CP Interference Check Sample)

A.1.8.6.1 Present and complete? [ A ]

(VOTE: Not required for furnace AA, flame AA, aercury,cyar.'ide and Ca, Mg, K and Na.)

A.1.8.6*2 Circle all values on Data Summary Sheet that are aorethan j*; 201 of true or established mean value. Are allInterference Check Sample results inside of controllimits (* 20Z)?

If no, is concentration of Al, Ca, Fe, or Mg lower insample than in ICS? [__) __

ACTION: If no, flag as estimated (J) those positiveresults for which ICS recovery is between121-1502 ; flag all staple results as estimatedif ICS recovery falls within 50-791; reject(red-line) those sample results for which ICSrecovery is less than 50Z; if ICS recovery i*above 1501, reject positive results only (notflagged with a "U").

A. 1.8.6.3 Vas ICS analyzed at beginning and end of run /(or at least twice every 8 hours)? F_ 0 __

ACTION: If no, flag as estimated (J) all samples forwhich AL, Ca, Fe, or Mg i« higher than in ICS.

A.1.8.7 Form V A (Spiked sample Recovery - Pre-Pigestion/Pre-Pittallation)-( Note: Not required for Ca, Mg, R, and Na (both matrices), Al, and Fe(soil only,)

fiR303338

Title: Evaluation of Metals Data for the Date- Dec I9goContract Laboratory Program . - Number: *HV--»"Appendix A.I: Data Assessment - Contract Revision- 8Coeplianc« (Total Review - Inorganics)

YES NO

A.1*6.7.] Present *KC complete for: each 20 samples' ( )

each matrix type?

each cone, range (i.e. low, aed., high)? [__] __

For both AA and ICP when both are used for sameanalyte? I__]

ACTIO^' If no for any of the above, flag asestimated (J) all positive data lessthan four times spiking level for

-*. which spiked sample was not analyzed.

NOTE: If one spiked sample was analyzed for morethan 20 samples, then first 20 samplesanalyzed do not have to be flagged asestimated (J),

A.1.8.7.2 Was field blank used for spiked sample? __ { \ ]

If yes, was field blank described as such on TrafficReport? __ [_

ACTION': If yes, flag all positive data less than4 x spike added as estimated (J) for whichfield blank was used as spiked sample.

A.1.8.7.3 Circle all values on Data Summary Sheet that are outsideof control limits (75X to 1251). Are all recoverieswithin control limits? [__] X

If no, is sample concentration greater than or equalto four tiaes spike concentration? [__] \

ACTION: If yes, disregard tpike recoveries foranalytes whose concentrations are greaterthan or equal to four times spike added.If no, circle those analytes on Form V forwhich sample concentration is less thanfour times the spike concentration.

Are results outside the control limits (75-125Z)flagged with "N" on Form I'* and Form VA? [_X] __

ACTION: If no, write in the contract problem/non compliancesection of "Data Assessment Narrative".

AR303339

Title: Evaluation of Metals Data for the Date: Otc.Contract Laboratory Program Number: "HV-£Appendix A.I: Data Assessment - Contract Revision: BCompliance (Total Review - Inorganics)

Are any sp:?.* recoveries:(a) less than 302? ^g { y ;

(b) between 30-742? x( [ ]

(c) between 126-1502? __ [ \ ]

(d> greater than 1502? __ [X }

ACTION: If less than 302, reject all associated aqueousdata: if between 30-742, flag all associatedaqueous data as estimated (J); if between126-1502, flag as estimated (J) all associatedaqueous data not flagged with a "U"; ifgreater than 1502, reject (red-line) allassociated aqueous data not flagged with a "U".

NOTE: If pre- digestion tpike result is rejectable due tocoefficient of correlation of MSA, analytical apikerecovery, or duplicate injections criteria , disregard spikerecovery on Form V, Flag the associated data as estimated(J).

A. 2. 8. 7. 5 Soil/Sediment

Are any spike recoveries:(a) less than 102? Y [ ]

(b) between 10-741? X ( __ 1 V

(c) between 126-2002?

(d) greater than 2002? __ [\Xl

ACTION: If less than 102, reject all associated data;if between 10-742, flag all associated data asestimated; if between 126-2001, flag as estimatedall associated data was not flagged with a "U";if greater than 2002, reject all associateddata not flagged with a "U".

A.1.8.8 Fora VI (Lab Duplicates)

A. 1.8*8.1 Present and complete for: each 20 samples? IX )

each aatrix type? f/*h

each concentration range (i.e. low, aed., high)? [__] __ -rs

flR3033UO

i. .i.-n.ar. c: r-.c-.A^ft L*i* for tne Date* DContract Laboratory Frograa Number- *« 5*Appendix A.I: Data Assessment - Contract Revision- »Compliance (Total Review - Inorganics) " 8

both AA and T^-vhen both are us»^ for saae analyte? \ ]

If no for any the above, fiJf „ estimated <J)all data >C*I<L* for which duplicate saople wasnot analyzed.

Note: If one duplicate sample was analyzed for morethan 20 samples, then first 20 camples do nothave to be flagged as estiaated.

A. 1.8. 8. 2 Was field blank used for duplicate analysis? r V i

If yes, was field blank identified as such on, Traffic Report? •> v/,

ACTION: If yes, flag all data >CRDL* as estimated (J)for which field blank was used as duplicate.

A. 1.8. 8. 3 Circle all values on Data Summary Sheet that are outsidecontrol limits:

Aqueous Samples (a) 205 RPD orCRDL

Soil Samples (a) 35t RPD or

Are all values within control limits? £gf ]V1

If no, are all results outside the control limitsfl.agged with an * on Fora I'a and VI? jXj __ ^

ACTION: If no, write In the contract problems/non-compliance section of "Data Assessment Narrative".

KOTE: 1. RPD is not calculable for an analyteof the sample - duplicate pair whenboth values are less than IDL.

'2* If lab duplicate result is rejectable due to coefficientof correlation of MS A, analytical spike recovery, orduplicate injections criteria, do not apply precisioncriteria. Flag the associated data as estimated.

A. 1.8.8.4 Is any value for sample duplicate pair less than CRDL* 'and other value greater than or equal to 10 x *CRDL? ___ I y ] a__

ACTION: If yes, flag the associated data.

V Substitute IDL for CRDL when IDL > CRDL.

&R3Q33M

Title: Evaluati n f Metal* Data for the Date; D«c»Contract Laboratory Program Number: HW-2Appendix A.I: Data Assessment - Contract Revision: 8Compliance^ (Total Review - Inorganics)

NO

A. S .5.8,5 Aqueous , . ' . _ -

Is any RPD greater than 50J where sample and duplicate*re both greater than or equal to 5 times *CRDL? __

Is any difference between cample and duplicate greaterthan *CRDL where cample and/or duplicate ic lees than5 tines *CRDL? __

ACTIC.V; If yes, flag the associated data as estimated.

A. 1.8. 8. 6 Soil/Sediment

Is any R7D (vhere sample and duplicate are bothgreater than or equal to 5 times *CRDL) :

2 loot? t _Is any difference between cample and duplicate(where sample and/or duplicate is less than 5x*CRDL) :

>2x*CRT>L? [X; ]

ACTION: If yes, flag the associated data as estimated.

A. 1.8. 9 Field Duplicates

A. 1.8. 9.1 Were field duplicates analyzed? ( ] V—— x

ACTION: If yes, prepare a Form VI for each field duplicatepair* report concentrations of soils in ug/1 on vetweight basis and calculate RPDc.

NOTE : 1 • Do not calculate RPD when both values are less than IDL.2. flag all associated data only for field duplicate.

A. 1.6* 9. 2 Circle all values on Form VI for field duplicates that are outsidecontrol limits:

Aqueous Samples (a) 201 RPD orCRDL

Soil Samples (a) 351 RPD or•(b>+ CRDL

* Substitute IDL for CRDL when IDL > CRDL.

RR3033H2

Title: Evaluation of Metals Data for theContract Laboratory Program Date: Dec.Appendix A.I: Data Assescaent - Contract Number:Compliance. (Total Review - Inorganics) Revision: 8

ir* *i: v*r~*-. -::~ir. ccr.trol limits? [ __ j v

A.l«ft*?«3 Is any value for sample duplicate pair less than *CRDLand other value greater than or t^utl to 10 x *CRDL? __ [ i V

j ACTION : If yes, flag the associated data as estimated.

A, 1.8. 9. ft Aqueous

Is any RPD greater than 50Z where sample a\ad duplicate^. are both greater than or equal to 5 times *CRDL? __ [ __ ] }

I Is any difference between sample and duplicate greater. than *CRDL vhere saople and/or duplicate is lesi than

5 times *CRDL? ' r i* -j_- i _ t ^1 ACTION: If yes, flag the associated data as estimated.

j A. 1.8*9. 5 Soil/Sedlcent

Is any RPD (vhere sample and duplicate are both, greater than 5 times *CRDL) :

2100I? _ [1 Is any difference between sample and duplicate! (where sample and/or duplicate Is less than Sx *CRDL ):

>2x

ACT10K: If yest flag the associated data as estimated.

A. 1.8. 10 Fora VII (Laboratory Control Sample) (Note: LCS - notrequired for aqueous Hg and cyanide analyses.)

A. 1.8. 10*1 Vas one LCS prepared and analyzed for:every 20 water samples? [ Y ] -• __

every 20 solid samples? [ Xl __ __

both AA and ICP when both mre used for same analyte? I ] X

BR30331»3

•• ——————

Title: Evaluation of Metals Daca for the Date: Dee. 198SContract Laboratory Progran Number: HV-2Ap?*?id{x A.I: Data Assessment - Contract Revision: 8Coepliance .(Total Review - Inorganic*)

YES NO

:-.rvrjL--: '•• *r-:' --tr 5r'' -- -*" abt •••£•» prepare TelephoneFvecord Log and contact laboratory for submittalof results of solid LCS. Flag as estituted(J)all data for which LCS was not analyzed*

NOT!: If only one LCS was analyzed for nore than 20samples, then first 20 sacples close to LCSdo noc have .Co be flagged as estimated*

A.I.8.10.2 Aqueous

Circle all LCS values outside of controllimits(80 - 2201- except aqueous Ag and Sb).

Is any LCS recovery: less than 50Z? __ lY]™ " ^ "• ™™ ™"~between 50Z and 79Z? __ \y } _

between 121Z and 150Z? __ [J£] _

greater than 150Z? __ [ >( ] _

ACTION: Less than 50Z, reject (red-line) all data;between 50: and 79Z, flag all associated dataas estimated (J); between Z21Z and 150Z, flagall positive (noc flagged with a "U") resultsas estimated; greater than 150Z, reject allpositive results.

A,1.8-10.3 Solid LCS

NOTE: 1. If IDL of an analyte is equal to or greater thanTrue Value of LCS, disregard the following criteria,

2. If"Found"value of LCS is rejectable due to duplicateinjections or analytical apike recovery criteria,disregard LCS recovery; flag the associated data asestiaated(J).

a. If the Solid LCS recovery for any analyte fallsoutside EPA control limits, qualify all aaopleresults >IDL as estioated (J).

b. If the LCS results are higher than the controllimits and the sample results < IDL, the dataare acceptable*

c. If the LCS results are lower than the controllimits,qualify all sample results < IDL asestimated(UJ),

Title: Evaluation of Metals Data for the _ . _ . *Contract Laboratory Program . Number- --"Appendix A.I: Data Assessment - Contract Revisi" • a "

(Total Review - Inorganics) . on: a

A.1.8-11 Fore IX (TCP Serial Dilution) -

A.1.8.11.1 •** Serial relation analysis performed for:each 20 staples? [ V7 ]

each matrix type? [__]

each concentration range (i.e. low, Bed.)? [__]

""*" ACTION": If no for any of the above, flag all positive data-freater than cr equal to lOxIDLs as estimated (J)for which Serial Dilution Analysis was not performed,and summarize the deficiency on the DPO report*

A.1.8.11.2 Was field blank(s) used for Serial Dilution Analysis? __

If yes, was field blank described as such on TrafficKeport? ' __ [__] >

ACTION: If yes, flag all associated data >_ 10 x IDLas estimated (J).

A.1.8.11.3 Circle all values on Data Summary Sheet that are ousideof control limit C+10 I). Are all values within 10 Z ? [__]

,. Are results outside control limit flaggedwith an "E" on Form I'» and Form IX? [__) __

ACTIOK: If no, write in the contract problem/non-compliancesection of the"Data Assessment Narrative".

A. 1.8.11.4 Are any 2 Diff. values : __ [__] 2> 101 ?

2 100* ? __ t__1 2

ACTION: Flag as estimated (J) all associated sample resultsequal to or greater than 1 Ox ID Is for which percentdifference ic greater than 101 but less than 100Z.Reject (red-line) all associated sample resultsequal to or greater than lOxIDLs for which PD isgreater than or equal to 100Z.

AR3033U5

Title: Evaluation of Metals Data for the Date: Dec. 19SSContract Laboratory Program . Kumber: *HV-2"Appendix A.I: Data Assessment - Contract Revision: gCompliance (Total Review - Inorganics)

YH5

A ... 8 . 12 Furr.jce JUos: c Ar>'-:.'.'-LL'* *~ ' $c. A-a- V*is

A.1.8.12.1 A-- :.::.*$:* injections present in furnace rav datafoes::, curing full Method of Standard Addition) foreach casple analyzed by GFAA? [^ )

ACTION: If no, reject the data on Fora !'• for whichduplicate injections vere not performed.

A.1.8.12.2 Do the duplicate injection readings aarree within 20XRelative Standard Deviation (RSD> or Coefficient ofVariation (CV) for concentration greater than CRDL? [ X }

Was a dilution analyzed for sample with poet digestionspike recovery less than 402?

ACTION': If no for any of the above, flag til theassociated data as estimated (J).

A.1.8.12.3 -Is *post digestion spike recovery less than lOt orgreater than 1502 for any result? __ [XI

ACTION: If yes, reject (red-line) the affected data ifrecovery is <10t; reject data not flagged with "ITif spike recovery is >150*.

NOTE : Reject the data only if the affected saaple wasnot subsequently analyzed by Method of StandardAddition.

A.. 1.8.13 Form VIII (Method of Standard Addition Results)

A.1.8.13.1 Present? [__]

If no, is any Foro I result coded with "S" or a "+'•? __ (V )

ACTION: If yes, write request, on Telephone Record Log andcontact laboratory for submittal of Fora VIII.

A.1.8.13.2 Is coefficient of correlation for MSA less than 0.990 for«ny saople? __ {__]

ACTION: If yes. reject (red-line) affected data.

* Post digestion spike is not required on the pre-digestion spiked staple when pre

digestion spike recovery is within control Units of 75-125Z or when SR2

flR3033U6

Title: Evaluation of Metal* Data for the Date: Dec. 19saContract Laboratory Frograo . Number: *HV-2*Appendix A.,1': Data Assessment - Contract Revision- SCoapli«n.ce (Total Review - Inorganics)

A.J.8.13.3 Vas *M5A required for any sample but not performed? __

Is coefficient of correlation for MSA less than 0.995? __ [ ] \

Are KSA calculations outside the linear range of thecalibration curve generated at the beginning of theanalytical run? . • __ [ ] ^

ACTION: If yes for any of the above, flag allthe associated data as estimated (J).

A-J.8.13.4 Was proper qaantitatlon procedure followed correctlyas outlined in the SOW on page E-16 through E-17? [ \/]

ACTION: If no, note exception under contract problem/non-compliance of data assessment narrative, orprepare a seperate list*

A.1*8.14 Dissolved/Total or Inorganic/Total Analvtes -• "_

total analytes on the same sanple(s). __ [__] X^

Vere any analyses performed for inorganic as veil as total(organic + inorganic) analytes on the same aample(s)? __ [__] \^

If yes, apply the following questions only ifinorganic (or dissolved ) results are (i) aboveCRDL, and (ii) greater than total constituents.

A.1.8.14.2 Is the concentration of any dissolved (or inorganic)analyte greater than Its total concentration by•ore than lOt? __ [__]

A.l.S.U.3 Is the concentration of any dissolved (or inorganic)analyte greater than its total concentration by*ore than 50J? __ [__)

NOTE : Prepare a list comparing differencesbetween all dissolved (or Inorganic) andtotal analytes.Compute the differencesas a percent of the total analyte onlywhen both are above CRDL.

* KS*A is not required on LCS and prep, blank.

Title: Evaluation of Metals Data for the Date-- Sec, 29$.Contract Laboratory Program . Number: RV-2Appendix A.I: Data Assessment - Contract Revision: 8Compliance- (Total Review - Inorganics)

YES NO

A:T:?V If aore than JO?, flag both dissolved (or inorganic)and total values as estimated (J); if acre than505, reject (red-line) the data for both valuse.

A. 1.8*15 Fora I to IX

A. 1.8. 15.1 Are all the Forte I through Form IX labeled with:Laboratory name? [ / )

Case number? [ y ]

EPA sample No.?

SDC No.?

Contract No.? [ X 1

Correct units? (V }

Matrix?

ACTION: If no for any of the above, note undercontract problem/non-compliance aection of narrative.of the"Data Assessment Narrative".

A. 1.8. 15. 2 Do any computation/transcription errors exceed lOt ofreported values on Forms I-IX for:

(NOTE: Check all fortes against raw data.)

(a) all analyte* analyzed by ICP? __ [ V ]

(b) all analytes analyzed by GFAA? __ [.. V}

(c) all analytes analyzed by AA Flame? __ [ __ I

(d) Mercury? __

(e) Cyanide? __ .[\/ '

ACTION: If yes, prepare Telephone Log, contact laboratoryfor corrected data and correct errors with redpencil and initial*

Title: Evaluation of Metals Data for the Date: Dec. I98flContract Laboratory Program Number: *HV-2~Appendix A.I: Data Assessment - Contract Revision: 8Cocp-iance (Total Review - Inorganics)

NO IPYES NO

A.1.8.16 Tors I (Tlelc? Blar.k) -

Circle all field blank values on Data Summary Sheetthat are greater than 2xIDL.Do concentrations of field blank(s) fall below tvotimes IDLf for all parameters of associated aqueousand soil staples? [__]

If no, was field blank value already rejected due toother QC criteria? [__]

ACTIO.v- . If no, reject (red line) all associated-*. aqueous and soil/sediaent data (except field

blank) that has a concentration less thanfive times the field blank value not flaggedwith a "U" (less than).

A.1.8*17 Form XI» XII, XIII (Quarterly Verification of InstrumentalParaneters).

A,1.8.17.1 It quarterly verification report present for:

Instrument Detection Limits? iXl

1C? Interelement Correction Factors? [ Y ] __

ICP Linear Ranges? [J/] __

ACTION': If no, contact DPO of the lab.

A.1.8.17.2 Fors XI (Instrument Detection Limits) - (Note: IDL is notrequired for Cyanide.)

Are IDLs present for: all the analytes? [_£] __

all the instruments used? f y] __ _

For both AA and ICP when both are used for sameanalyte? [__] __ X

ACTION: If no for any of the above, prepareTelephone Record Log and contact laboratory.

//•* { / t\s~\ /u

Title: Evaluation of Metals Data for the Pace: Dec* 1983Contract Laboratory .Program . Number: HW-2Appendix A.I: Data Assessment - Contract Revision: 8Compliance'(Total Review - Inorganics)

YES iO

Is IDL greater than CRDL for any analyte? __

If yes, Is the concentration of the sample analyzed onthe instrunent whose IDL exceeds CRDL, greater than5 x IDL? [__] __

MMB ACTION": If no, reject (red-line) all values less thanfive times IDL of the instruoent whose IDLexceeds CRDL.

A. 1.8.17.3 Fore XII (Linear Ranges)

Was any sample result higher than high linear rangeof ICP by more than 102? __ [ >/ ]

Was any sample result higher than the highestcalibration standard for non-ICP parameters? />C [

If yes for any of the above, was dilution performed > ^on the sanple to bring raw data in linear range or (^ ] __ \Jbelow the highest standard.

MMB ACTION: If no, flag the result reported on Form Ias estimated(J).

ATTACHMENT XVDPO REPORT

fiR30335

Title: Evaluation of Metal* Data for the Date: Dec. 1958Contract Laboratory Program Number: W~2Appendix A.2: Data Assessment Narrative Revision: 8

Case* x slt€ J5t*7l/Dft *f£> ttt(_t£ih,F Matrix: Soil __f

Reviewer ^S~~ _____ Lab HT v __________ Water /

Contractor ____________ Other

A. 2.1 All data are of acceptable quality? Yes ____ No X

If no, exceptions are noted below with rea»on(«) for-*• rejection or qualif ication as estimated value (J).

*~~&jJL it & /a in*L-tv '.

A

4R303352

or

Title: Evaluation of Metal* Data for the Date: Dec. 19SSContract Laboratory Profram - Number- *HW-2"Appendix A.7: CLP Data Assessment Checklist Revision- BInorganic Analysis .. ,

INORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENTCASE NO. 'LABORATORY tQ^trrr\____________________ NO. OF SAMPLES/

MATRIX

SD-Sf -mC/PI_______________________ REVIEWER (IF NOT ESD)

SO"»*J2JQ___________________________ REVIEWER'S NAME

7. MATRIX SPIKE i fl *"—~8. MSA c """ ———9* SERIAL DILUTION ,. ————————10. SAMPLE VERIFICATION' ^ c. /•.11. OTHER QC _6 "————— ,12. OVERALL ASSESSMENT "~ -*-

0 • Data has no problems/or qualified due to minor problems.M « tfata qualified due to major problems.Z - Data unacceptable.X * Problems, but do not affect data.

AREAS OF CONCERN:

NOTABLE PERFORMANCE:

DPO: ACTION_________FYI X__________ COMPLEHON DATE %>* Mf

DATA ASSESSMENT SUMMARY

lCp AA Hg CYANIDE

1. HOLDING TIMES C C ft Q2. CALIBRATIONS r, C "" Q ^ ——3. BLANKS 6 O Q ———Z!——4. ICS u ———————— ——————— ——————!5. LCS t, f-6. DUPLICATE ANALYSIS . ~~7J———— C

flR303353

—I • rk7 f4/*™ rtU TTtUC • /J-*x <M . „. ," /Wljr "/. (AU*iUw ij.*,r.5. fT- y^tr//^. »r/*.f u.v v a _>ci • ^t^^ue \ *, ^ Kk r't,c&£ dr*.1} t 7 y [ ^^

OPERATING PROCEDURE Pag* 29 of JC

Titl*: Evaluation of Metals D*c«j for the . Dat«: Dec. 1988Contract Laboratory Program Number: HU-2Appendix A*fe* ,CLF Data Asaeaaaeat t«viaIon: 6Sumnary Fons (Inorganic*)

Clf DATA ASSESSMENT SUMKAJtY rOKJf (IHOiCANICS)

of ttvi+v: CCl 7JO

Site: 'TfrTU'DTg 'fr a £ f < L u ___________ ; Ub

mr'* Initial*:____Jr:_______ iHwb«r ef S«apl««!

Anilyt«i Ktlecctd Put to E»c««dini !•»!•¥ Crjttrl*:*

ICP

Fla»* AA

Furnaei AA

Mercury

ftital

[othtr

HoldiniTi««i

0

0£)

0(J

?r«pC*llbT»clon'l]«nk

0

/;

V00

O

oU

o0

Fitldll*ok

locar-far*octa

<0

^

O6U

SpikeHteov«rr

iO

o060

Duplicate*LablField

6

r^_/

02

0

DattctioDLi»lt*

0

oor>0

LCS

o0o00

fttrialDilution

6

o0

6c

KSA

ft

o(>6I)

TotilABAlyCtl

ffJ

3051905

l«j«etler

ooo4~&~&6

Aaalyt«t FUcttd ai Eaciaatad (J) Out to Cxcttdior Crittria For:*

ICF

Fla*« AA'

Furnace AA

Her cur?

Total

Othtr

o

uu0.0

b0 .

000

0

0.0o0

o

o0o0

&£/d^3 n0

G>

0

5

£

0

0

6?£>0c)

/0

0i0

40o

Yh

o

uu

IS(J

90

Jo5tjQ

$

3Y

/A>5iro

Moct:jutariik (*) Iodicic«i addicie&al *xc**dt&e*B ef rtvitv criteria.

Irii

ii-

iII

ATTACHMENT VSUPPORT DOCUMENTATION

AR303355

Tide: Evaluation of Metal. Data for theContract laboratory Program ««te: a,c, ]9ggM>T>e*dix A.5: Sunaary of Inorganic* - Nunber: HV-2Quality Control Data R«vi«ton: 8

? or iMOtCAJiics QUALITY comoi, PATA** MO,_1S1

•Afiii sttfc Js <ti ir350UL »ILCTION CMPUTXOK

111* II 1CP 1C5IH SiLtb

c » te» us »u| c

AR303356

- - - - w ,. 4. - — .. - . U.

Contract Laboratory Program &ac«: Dec. 19SSAppendix A. 5: Sunoary of Inorganic* Nuaber: HU-2Quality Control Data *«vi»ion: 9

flR303357

-Contract Laboratory Program Nuaber; KV-1Appendix A.5: Suaoary of Inorganics R»vi«ion; eQuality Control Data

-«CTffU>Y Of iMQiCtfiei QUALITY COITTtO!. DATA

LA1CHLATORY: Ofo^K C*£t fcS. flL SOU HO. Igl SAHPU TTPE:

sm/sn-SY

Ilani____________MP. *'S:______________ UJ KTP, #'S:____________ ttaflii iHg T"

SOLUI. OIUCTIOK SAMPLE MO._______^^ C«PUTIOK CAgrV/"? UTIEVIXSnx m in — TfLlslC*tS.'L

Ctllb. V«r. .Cll>i $14.V vtr. X 1

Gal i»r« ties

ICR:I ;xri____tan i 2 3f Coocinutd I Coatiau«d

laitfPlBJlttit 1 2 3

P It Lt A*

IT

icsX t

lolt Pin

H St Pr ix k

UbICS«1 1

StrOil

Z D200 £

Sb 60 W- PA* 10 ol.c

200 2i££>

£Ct 5000

Cr 10 tfl, f>Ce SO AY /A i

Cu 23 $ n/ £yr* 100

/*j.j5000 toil T7 f

Hfi 15 Pi0.2 o

Hi *oJ75000 trtf

$*

Al 10 £.

Rt 5000

Tl 10

50 jot*.

reCT

20

10

flR303358

c

111

Contract Laboratory Frogratt Nu«b« r • C " HV-2 "Appendix A. 5: Sunaary of Inorjani'ct *«vin'Quality Control Data on'

T •-__.„.. _. ... ——— -.„ —— it, tavpjmui. WiA

UHORATO«: tUfo(4 CASt HC. T

sm/fiuw »rscitiFriov:3T3C j 2) C//ori * t

1 rau>»». MS uStltUL S1LCTIOX SAKFU WO.

!

*

1I11

111

1%

J,

Ai

la

»*

W

C»

Cr

Ce

Cu

f.

?fc

«1

KJB

It

VI

K

S*

At

Ki

TJ

T

tn

CT

CC.'L |4n: •:-.200 P7

*0

10

200

5

5

5000

30

50

25

100

5

5000

15

vz-3.6-ZI3Mopiff/y^

j0.2 t?,2

« b5000

5

10

5000

10

SO

20

10

P3A^p/Y$5^

Unk

•

J our. »•

SOU HO.

SAKTU

n«aS;

J"?j ? SAK?LC TYPE:

HOS:

d ll«ok

COffLITIOK DAHA^^ tmiVUS IKITUU :"2&J—

» !»«r. I 1

Inlt 1 2 3 'laic

*HIV1

lrf»1£oK

|*>w<*ie\*ea^tf>

1**

IJU*

I,'-1*

fl,/.(.

wnif iis-0li."

*.v iTJ-l, l 1^,1

llcl -5

l -A

/«?.!

k

^

nv5

fcvj•',>s*JM*<i1.V

««1fcV

«t-l

/c/,1

•?»I'ti1

Mlfly

%(C''1

W).-

n^>

.0

V.o|.o

\.f\,0

Ifl.fl/VP*K/3/Ao/.m

/»?.*

Vf'7/v "4(^iil.o$1

t'1n//2,v

FIRM?AI

/ir5-«»l*>*/M^

4

;v=a

fcl

///2.1

rtr<T

W-7//fc>

Calikratiea•lABkt

lait 1 2 3

TTt iE A? If

1C? 1C*X t

lolt ru

H St pr iv k

Ufatop

IPT)

USS

X t

ftM

W

wft;*o'

^v//Z,7

H-

7/3-f«

*.?*,«"•?

O-7

*.J

// '<

S'//??'AJ17.?f?7

^

S*rDil

X t>

K*th

(?"/7

<z

P--rpT£ *TP£.I£J

£uJL'f£_£.'t.fIP&

. mAR303359

Contract Laboratory"program

°f

aR303360

Contract Laboratory Program Numbtr•**C"HU*3*Apptndix A.5: Suemary of Inorjanlc* *•«<./ . .Quality Control Data • • *«vision: 8

•SU*01A>? Of iKOHCAjnCS QUALITY COmOL PATA

SOU

C'hLf, * f SAKT-a H05:

FIELD KIF. *'*'_____________ *** WF. *'$:_

SOtlAL WICTIOX SAXFU MO.

l:ir*%A1

It

Afni«<uCi

erCe

Cu

F*

Ffc

"I

KB

lf

MItSt

Ac111Tl

,

z«CK

« i tiA . "m • in ' ' lk — if T fl TirHt —

eui200

40

10

200

5

5

5000

10

50

25

100

5

5000

IS

0.2

40

5000

5

10

5000

10

50

20

10

ttC

ftvz.3-3-1/

3/(ppV^/ys£r

20.2r/P3P-T,?/i/5510

Unk |

u«itB. *«r. .cwi *t< umr«tles» !v.r. Z 1 lUaks

1 ContlnuidIslt 1 : 3

!*•<

m

/pti

|a/r

IK-I

a

U*

* . i

W.7

1

fei

lait

l^tO

FifJlBit I 2 3

F •1 IC AF 9

ICF ICJI I

Isit Ft!

N Se Fr 1t k

Ub

IFC

'

uss: iW.f

•*«,.to.'•?7.y61V

/.VV

fl.1,„

w<1*»?i,.«fMtjy.y

at u

*4

faTS/ -

Tffr1-

"'1f

«<y

StrDil

Z D

K

th

^fe-

Y-ff>

P

P(>f=-\ff 'CM? 'ePP ,f-?rf\c,

flR30336i

Contr.ct

L

SOUL DILUTION SAKPU WO.

^^303362

Contract Laboratory Program N*Ce: °*c* 19SSAppendix A.5: Summary of Inorganic* "usher: HV-2Quality Control Data • R*vtsion: 6

Of IMOtCWCS QUAim «»•»«• -.-.

SCTUL————— j- — ** ——— . —— * ——— , ——— iiA 111 II! — — — *—— .. _ -. Vi/.-. —

*"*!

It

A«

ftfl

1*

C4

C«

Cr

Co

Cu

F«

Ffc

-NL,,.

Ma

it

VI

X

s*

A««•Tl

V

2*

c»

!D«£tCtiOCUliLJrsa

CR=^

200

40

10

200

5

5

5000

10

50

25

100

5

5000

15

0.2

40

5000

5

10

sooo10

50

20

10

1=:.to-a*Z*n

/3toj<i>yyi^o.i1?3*If(V&b/i)

Ti.HUnk

CAlib. v«r. ;•rf '1 i C«:

llBlt 1

i

• .-'

•i

j& ft*

itinutd2 3

ia>

1

fv«

lOi- *t<l CfUUratlos»tr. I I I lltmk.

Inlt M.n—t Cooti»u«*

lolt 1 2 3

••i^

'

p •t Lt AT »

icp icsX t

lilt Fie

H St »r ix k

Ub»u»

1?D« «*a

i <

NlB ^

> ^ ^

••— ™

ICS

I 1••H HH

•WH

•••v

_HBH

™ ™

StrOil

t D• •«

^ ___ ,

•H Kfl

•««•

•••••1

H i•th••~

••••^fL~e••••»C7!P1-?\r\v \£\f iP:rt/_'r \p£.-rFp.

r.

flR303363

Contract Laboratory Progrma Number: HV-2Appendix A. 5: Sucoary of Inorpnic» tevijion.- gQuality Control Data

OF tyOHCAKICS QUALTTY COrrtOL DATA

LAHMLATQIHf: Oes^yK CASE »w. ^ SOU HO^ SAHPU

DOS.-

M*ld ____________»'S: ZJJ KTF. »*S: attftl* JHg I:

SCHIAl BttPTIOK SAXKZ HO.__________ COKFUTXOKXI I IIA III

Fara-•at*r

D«t*etioe

teare*;;, i 1*1

>

Sb

As

,.

ft*

«

C«

Cf

Co

Co

r*M

HIHa

•tHi

ts*Af

w-

Tl

f

ZB

CU

200

to10

200

5

5

5000

10

50

25

100

5

5000 .

15

t/

U7-

2

^

/

3J(s2V^Pf%^«P

0.2 P'2

40

SOOO

5

10

5000

10

50

20

10

7P3^^)?/(/$5/i>

ri.uUmL '

Ciiit. 5«r. .CiD; St«9 !««r. Z 1Continued

lelt 1 2 3 Ililt

fl.J

1

fl«

i« - ~ i» » fi nrTt —talifcntiooSlMki

Ifilt 1 2 )

r tL

I A? »

C? 1CSX t

iBit F1.

N S

r 1i k

UtiXp us

1 1

S*rOil

Mcth7

^^fffppft^f>

\

?ePff-pf?rfC

WESTON WAYWEST CHESTER PA 19380PHONE 215-692-3030TELEX: 83-5348i ^r m—— ^ —— ——-•

UWQB6

29 MARCH 1990

ROY F. WESTON, INC.Client: STANDARD CHLORINERFW Sample No:9001L127-002 thru -006Client Sample ID: SB-113 SB-371 SB-372

SB-375 SB-451

METALS CASE NARRATIVE

1. Samples were received on 01-11-90. All required holdingtimes were met.

2. ICVs, CCVs and LCSs stock standards were purchased fromInorganic Ventures Laboratory.

3. All ICV and CCV values were within control limits.

4. All ICB and CCB values were within control limits,

5. All preparation blank values were within control limits.

6. All LCS results were within the 80-120% control limits.

Note: The USEPA has dropped control limits for antimonyand silver due to documented difficulties inobtaining reliable results. WESTON -Analyticshas adopted the same policy.

7. All aqueous matrix spike recoveries were within the 75-125%control limits with the exception of Sb. All correspondingsamples were flagged with an "N" according to CLP protocol.

8* All solid matrix spike recoveries were within the 75-125%control limits with the exception of Sb, As, Cr, Pb, Mn, Se,Ag, and V. All corresponding samples were flagged with an"N" according to CLP protocol.

9. All duplicate analyses were within the 20% RPD control limit

flR303365

U.S. EPA - CLP

2AINITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATION VERIFICATION

Lab Name: WESTON-LIONVILLE Contract: 68-W8-0057

Lab Code: WESTON Case No.: TRC SAS No.: SDG No,: TRC127

Initial Calibration Source: IV

Continuing Calibration Source: IV

Concentration Units: ug/L

Analyse

AluminumAntimonyArsenicBariumBerylliumCadmiumCalciumChromiumCobaltCopperIronLeadMagnesiumManganeseMercuryNickelPotassiumSeleniumSilverSodiumThalliumVanadiumZincCyanide

Initial CalibrationTrue Found %R(1)

5000.03000.030.0

5000.0250.0250.0

25000.0500.02500.01250.05000.030.0

25000.0750.04.9

2000.025000.0

30.0500.0

25000.030.0

2500.01000.0100.0

5278.602828.1029.30

4917.10229.40270.30

25545.40463.502354.901244.204962.0032.30

25126.30748.804.76

1826.3024926.80

27.60494.30

24536.2030.00

2401.10952.30102.53

105.694.397.798.391.8108.1102.292.794.299.599.2107.7100.599.897.191*399.792.098.998.1100,096.095.2102.5

Continuing CalibrationTrue Found %R(1) Found %R(1)

5000.03000.030.0

5000.0250.0250.0

25000.0500.02500.01250.05000.030.0

25000.0750.02.0

2000.025000.0

30.0500.0

25000.030.0

2500.01000.0100.0

5236.102750.4030.20

4923.30228.20269.90

25241.10455.802340.701178.704696.6031.50

24768.80709.70

2.161805.8024121.50

28.00485.60

24237.5030.20

2394.10932.20100.62

104.791.7100.798.591.3108.0101.091.293.694.393.9105.099.194.6108.090.396.593.397.197.0100.795.893.2100.6

5250.502720.5030.00

4962.20229.40267.00

25126.70454.802334.701169.004685.4032.50

24728.00700.901.94

1813.1024414.30

27.10476.90

24430.3033.10

2388.70931.10103.80

105.090.7100.099.291.8106.8100.591.093.493.593.7108.398.993.597.090.797.790.395.497.7110.395.593.1103.8

K

P~PFPPPPPPPPFPPCVPPFPPFPPC

FORM II (PART 1) - IN 7/87

/1R303366

(1) Control Limits: Mercury 80-120; Other Metals 90-110; Cyanide 85-115

Ir

U.S. EPA - CLP



Lab Code: WESTON Case No.: TRC SAS No.: SDG No.: TRC127




Analyte



5000.03000.0

30.05000.0250.0250.0

25000.0500.02500.01250.05000.0

30.025000.0750.02.0

2000.025000.0

30.0500.0

25000.030.0

2500.01000.0100.0


5000.03000.0

30.05000.0250.0250.0

25000.0500.02500.01250.05000.0

30.025000.0750.02.0

2000.025000.0

30,0500.0

25000.030.0

2500.01000.0100.0

5247.802771.80

28.104915.00228.20263.70

25026.20458.102317.401188.404769.2032.50

24728.90713.60

1.831807.7024817.00

30.60481.20

24464.4032.20

2365.80940.60

105.092.493.798.391.3

105.5100.191.692.795.195.4

108.398.995.191.590.499.3

102.096.297.9

107.394.694.1

5242.002781.5028.80

4926.00226.70261.20

24720.00450.402293.001192.404753.0032.3020.70717.50

1.781801.0024210.00

474.1024510.00

31.202343.00928.20

104.892.796.098.590.7

104.598.990.191.795.495.1

107.70.1

95.789.090.096.8

94.898.0

104.093.792.8

M

PPFPP

^PPPFPPCVPPFPPFPP



fiR3Q3367

I

U.S. EPA - CLP







Analyte -



5000.03000.030.0

5000.0250.0250.0

25000.0500.02500.01250.05000.0

30.025000.0750.02.0

2000.025000.0

30.0500-0

25000.030.0

2500.01000.0100,0

32.00

————

————

106.7

—————

Continuing CalibrationTrue Found %R(1) .Found %R(1)

5000.03000.030.0

5000.0250.0250.0

25000.0500.02500.01250.05000.030.0

25000.0750.02.0

2000.025000.0

30.0500.0

25000.030.0

2500.01000.0100.0

5273.003195.2028.60

5021.60237.70268.20

24970.40467.702361.901195.604784.10

32.1025072.30724.40

1.831879.0024890.20

30.30476.50

24967.2030.40

2395.40967.30

105.5106.595.3100.495.1107.399.993.594.595.695.7107.0100.396.691.594.099.6101.095.399.9101.395.896.7

5475.002795.1027.30

5122.80238.00273.60

25457.40472.902398.201197.104796.90

25880.20717.501.78

1904.3025439.20

30.80489.60

25677.7030.30

2428.90983.40

109.593.291.0102.595.2109.4101.894.695.995.895.9

103.595.789.095.2101.8102.797.9102.7101.097.298.3

M

P~PFPPPPPPPPFPPCVPPFPPFPP



fiR303368

U.S. EPA - CLP

2 AINITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATION VERIFICATION






Analyte



5000.03000.030.0

5000.0250,0250,0

25000.0500.02500.01250.05000,030.0

25000.0750.02.0

2000.025000.0

30.0500.0

25000.030.0

2500.01000.0100.0

5472.003169.00

5295.00257.00228.70

26211.70478.302585.001251.005076.00

26410,00721.70

2035.0026290.00

502.5026090.00

2266.001038.00

109.4105.6

105.9102.891.5104.895.7103.4100.1101.5

105.696.2

101.8105.2

100.5104.4

90.6103.8—————

Continuing CalibrationTrue Found %R ( 1 ) Found %R ( 1 )

5000.03000.030.0

5000.0250.0250.0

25000.0500.02500.01250.05000.030.0

25000.0750,02.0

2000.025000.0

30.0500.0

25000.030.0

2500.01000.0100.0

5308.203156.0029.20

5295.10240.50260.10

24660.90486.402377.501216.304926.1027.80

25647.00731.301.61

1992.4025666.10

30.70477.00

25815.8030.90

2430.001005.30

106.2105.297.3105.996.2104.098.697.395.197.398.592,7102.697.580.599.6102.7102.395.4103.3103.097.2100.5

4837.903124.00

5292.50246.50242.80

26039.40482.602529.201188.104957.80

24738,50717.401.94

1975.4024880.70

31.20485.30

24278.5031.60

2427.001030.80

96.8104.1

105.898.697.1104.296.5101.295.099.2

99.095.797.098.899.5104.097.197.1105.397.1103.1

M

PPFPPPPPPPPFPPCVPPFPPFPP



flR303369

U.S. EPA - CLP



Lab Cod©: WESTON Case No.: TRC SAS No.: SDG No.: TRC127




Analyte

AluminumAntimonyArsenicBariumBerylliumCadmiumCalciumChromiumCobaltCopperIronLeadMaanesiumMancraneseMercuryNickelPotassiumSeleniumSilverSodiumThalliumVanadiumZincCyanide


5000.03000.030.0

5000.0250.0250.0

25000.0500.02500.01250.05000.030.0

25000.0750.02.0

2000.025000.0

30.0500.0

25000.030.0

2500.01000.0100.0

4947.002793.00

5039.00252.20251.40

26200.00508.802573.001233.005025.0031.50

25320.00763.50

1986-0025340.00

493.6025080.00

32.302450.00

• 1013.00

98.993.1

100.8100.9100.6104.8101.8102.998.6100.5105.0101.3101.8

99.3101.4

98.7100.3107.798.0101.3


5000.03000.030.0

5000.0250.0250.0

25000.0500.02500.01250.05000.030.0

25000.0750.02.0

2000.025000.0

30.0500.0

25000.030.0

2500.01000.0100.0

5083.902751.0027.90

5303.30257.20240.90

27096.80493.702626.101243.705179.8032.50

25929.70719.801.94

2057.8025397.80

30.50480.00

25569.5030.50

2257.001069.90

101.791.793.0106.1102.996.4108.498.7105.099.5103.6108.3103.796.097.0102.9101.6101.796.0102.3101.790.3107.0

27.80

31.20

30.80

31.50

92.7

104.0

102.7

105.0

M

PPFPP•PPPFPPCVPPFPPFPP

(1) Control Limits: Mercury 8O-120; Other Metals 90-110; Cyanide 85-115


flR303370

U.S. EPA - CLP







Analyte



5000.03000.0

47.05000.0250.0250.0

25000.0500.02500.01250.05000.0

30.025000.0750.02.0

2000.025000.0

30.0500.0

25000.030.0

2500.01000.0100.0

4855.003237.00

44.104995.00273.40269.90

25840.00498,702640,001246.005084.00

31.9025200.00754.80

2036.0024500.00

532.4024860.00

2440.001044.00

97,1107.993.899.9109.4108.0103.499.7105.699.7

101.7106.3100.8100.6

101.898.0

106.599.4

97.6104.4

Continuing CalibrationTrue Found %R(1) • Found %R(1)

5000.03000.0

47.05000.0250.0250.0

25000.0500.02500,01250.05000.0

30.025000.0750.02.0

2000.025000.0

30.0500.0

25000.030.0

2500.01000.0100.0

4772.003188.0044.80

4926.00265.80237.70

25190.00497.702559.001223.005036.00

32.1025020.00733.60

2023.0023450.00

31.60518.60

24860.00

2379.001037.00

95.4106.395.398.5

106.395.1

100.899.5

102.497.8

100.7107.0100.197.8

101.293.8

105.3103.799.4

95.2103.7

3262.00

518.10

32.10

763.50

29.40

2478.00

108.7

"" -

103.6

107.0

101.8————

98.0

99.1————

M

P~PFPPPPPPPPFPP

P~PFPP

F"P


FORM II (PART 1} - IN 7/87

4R30337I

U.S. EPA - CLP





Continuing Calibration Source: .IV


Analyte

AluminumAntimonyArsenicBariumBerylliumCadmiumCalciumChromiumCobaltCopperIronLeadMaanesiumMancraneseMercuryNickelPotassiumSeleniumSilverSodiumThalliumVanadiumZincCyanide

Initial CalibrationTrue Found %R ( 1 )

5000.03000.0

30.05000.0250.0250.0

25000.0500.02500.01250.05000.0

30.025000.0750.02.0

2000.025000.0

30.0500.0

25000.030.0

2500.01000.0100.0

3255.0029.30

545.30

776.50

2503.00

108.597.7

109.1

103.5

100.1


5000.03000.0

30.05000.0250.0250.0

25000.0500.02500.01250.05000.0

30.025000.0750.02.0

2000.025000.0

30.0500.0

25000.030.0

2500.01000.0100.0

3256.0030.30

540.10

757.50

27.50

2422.00

108.5101.0

108.0

101.0

91.7

96.9

M

PF

f—

—

P

F

P

—

(1) Control Limits: Mercury 80-120; Other Metals'90-110; Cyanide 85-115


3R3Q3372

U.S. EPA - CLP







Analyte



5000.03000.052.6

5000.0250.0250.0

25000.0500.02500.01250.05000.030.0

25000.0750.02.0

2000.025000.0

30.0500.0

25000.030.0

2500.01000.0100.0

48.60

-30.50

92.4

————

————

————

101.7

————


5000.03000.052.6

5000.0250.0250.0

25000.0500.02500.01250.05000.030.0

25000.0750.02.0

2000.025000.0

30.0500.0

25000.030.0

2500.01000.0100.0

52.20

29.40

99.2

————

————

————

98.0

—————

52.20

28.10

99.2

————

————

————

————

93.7

————

M

F"

—

—

H

—



flR303373

U.S. EPA - CLP

2AINITIAL AND. CONTINUING CALIBRATION VERIFICATION






Analyte

AluminumAntimonyArsenicBariumBerylliumCadmiumCalciumChromiumCobaltCopperIronLeadMaanesiumManganeseMercuryNickelPotassiumSeleniumSilverSodiumThalliumVanadiumZincCyanide


5000.03000.030.0

5000.0250.0250.0

25000.0500.02500.01250.05000.030.0

25000.0750.02.0

2000.025000.0

30.0500.0

25000.030.0

2500.01000.0100.0

30.00 100.0


5000.03000.030.0

5000.0250.0250.0

25000.0500.02500.01250.05000.030.0

25000.0750.02.0

2000.025000.0

30.0500.0

25000.030.0

2500.01000.0100.0

29.20

27.10

97,3

90.3

30.60 102.0

M

F_

i

F



flR30337ii

U.S. EPA - CLP





Continuing Calibration Source:. IV


Analyte



5000.03000.030.0

5000.0250.0250.0

25000.0500.02500.01250.05000.0

30.025000.0750.02.0

2000.025000.0

52.6500.0

25000.030.0

2500.01000.0100.0

29.10

.

54.50

97.0

————

————

————

————

103.6————

————

————


5000.03000.030.0

5000.0250.0250.0

25000.0500.02500.01250.05000.030.0

25000.0750.02.0

2000.025000.0

52.6500.0

25000.030.0

2500.01000.0100.0

28.70

53.60

95.7

————

101.9

————

————

29.80

53.60

99.3

————

————

————

101.9

————

————

M

H

T~

—



AR3Q3375

U.S. EPA - CLP







Analyte

AluminumAntimonyArsenicBariumBerylliumCadmiumCalciumChromiumCobaltcopperIronLeadMat erne slumManganeseMercuryNickelPotassiumSeleniumSilverSodiumThalliumVanadium2incCyanide


5000.03000.030.0

5000.0250.0250.0

25000.0500.02500.01250.05000.0. 30.025000.0750.02.0

2000.025000.0

30.0500.0

25000.030.0

2500.01000.0100.0


5000.03000.030.0

5000.0250.0250.0

25000.0500.02500.01250.05000.030.0

25000.0750.02.0

2000.025000.0

52.6500.0

25000.030.0

2500.01000.0100.0

51,60 98.1 50.40 95.8

M

-

i

F

(!) Control Limits: Mercury 80-120; Other Metals 90-110; Cyanide 85-115


AR303376

U.S. EPA - CLP

2A "INITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATION VERIFICATION


Lab Code: WESTON Case No.: TRC SAS No.: SPG No.: TRC127




Analyte



5000.03000.030.0

5000.0250.0250.0

25000.0500.02500.01250.05000.030.0

25000.0750.02.0

2000.025000.0

30.0500.0

25000.030.0

2500.01000.0100.0

Continuing CalibrationTrue Found %R ( 1 ) Found %R ( 1 }

5000.03000.030.0

5000.0250.0250.0

25000.0500.02500.01250.05000.030.0

25000.0750.02.0

2000.025000.0

52.6500.0

25000.030.0

2500.01000.0100.0

53.60

————

101.9

————

50.40 95.8

M

—

F~—

—



flR303377

U.S. EPA - CLP

2BCRDL STANDARD FOR AA AND ICP


Lab Code; WESTON Case No.: TRC SAS No.: SDG No.: TRC127

AA CRDL Standard Source: IV

ICP CRDL Standard Source: IV


Analyte

AluminumAntimonyArsenicBariumBerylliumCadmiumCalciumChromiumCobaltCopperIronLeadMaanesiumManqaneseMercuryNickelPotassiumSeleniumSilverSodiumThalliumVanadiumZinc

CRDL S1

True

10.0

3.0

5.0

10.0

:andard fo3

Found

9.80

2.70

5.00..

8.30

r AA

%R

98.0

90.0

100.0

83.0

True

400.0120.0

400.010.010.0

1000.020.0100.050.0200.0

1000.030.0

80.01000.0

20.01000.0

100.040.0

CRDL StaiInitialFound

416.7060.20

188.209.8010.80

1119.2020.70100.4055.10217.40

1136.9029.30

78.101372.60

22.70978.00

97.4043.50

idard j

%R

104.250.2

47.098.0108.0111.9103.5100.4110.2108.7

113.797.7

97.6137.3

113.597.8

97.4108.8

for ICPFina:

Found

414.2066.00

189.109.5011.60

1114.1026.10100.1052.20209.60

1100.3023.40

80.001372.60

21.50972.40

93,0043.50

L%R

103.655.0

47.395.0ll Bjlll H——— ^i130.5100.1104.4104.8

110.078.0

100.0137.3

107.597.2

93.0108.8


AR303378

U.S. EPA - CLP







Analyte

AluminumAntimonyArsenicBariumBerylliumCadmiumCalciumChromiumCobaltCopperIronLeadMagnesiumManganeseMercuryNickelPotassiumSeleniumSilverSodiumThalliumVanadiumZinc

CRDL St

True

10.0

3.0

5.0

10.0

:andard fo]

Found

9.60

2.90

5.00

10.00

r AA

%R

96.0

96.7

100.0

100.0

True

400.0120.0

400.010.010.0

1000.020.0100.050.0200.0

1000.030.0

80.01000.0

20.01000.0

100.040.0


395.30105.60

199.5011.409.30

1226.0021.30113.7055.80310.40

1296.1023.00

87.901524.90

20.701073.20

89.6045.70

idard

%R

98.888.0

49.9114.093.0122.6106.5113.7111.6155.2

129.676.7

109.9152.5

103.5107.3

89.6114.2

for ICPFina

Found

392.10142.80

198.3010.6010.30

1196.8024.60105.4054.00314.00

1171.5023.00

91.901075.40

18.10954.30

98.3045.40

i%R

98.0119.0

49.6106.0103.0119.7123.0105.4108.0157.0

117.276.7

114.9107.5

90.595.4

98.3113.5


U.S. EPA - CLP







Analyte


CRDL Standard for AA

True Found %R

10*0

3.0

5.0

10.0

*

10.60

2.50

9.70

106.0

83.3

194.0

CRDL Standard for ICPInitial Final

True Found %R Found %R

400.0120.0

400.010.010.0

1000.020.0100.050.0200.0

1000.030.0

80.01000.0

20.01000.0

100.040.0

371.3099.80

199.809.4016.50

1254.7023.10109.7050.30274.70

1169.1034.70

82.501591.10

17.601009.30

119.9044.70

92.883.2

50.094.0165.0125.5115.5109.7100.6137.4

116.9115.7

103.1159.1

88.0100.9

119.9111.8

372.60116.20

197.709.4011.90

1248.7024.00105.6048.10277.00

1179.1031.20

75.001491.60

16.70996.60

97.2043.70

93.296.8

49.494. qJ119124. 1120.0105.696.2138.5

117.9104.0

93.8149.2

83.599.7

97.2109.2


flR303380

U.S. EPA - CLP







Analyte


CRDL St

True

10.0

3.0

5.0

10.0

:andard f o:

Found

9.70

4.30

r AA

%R

97.0

86.0

True

400.0120.0

400.010.010.0

1000.020.0100.050.0200.0

1000.030.0

80.01000.0

20.01000.0

100.040.0


292.60110.50

199.9011.5011.90

1120.0028.00110.3051.50258.20

1145.0030.90

94.601105.00

22.20988.80

109.7044.90

idard ]

%R

73.292.1

50.0115.0119.0112.0140.0110.3103.0129.1

114.5103.0

118.2110.5

111.098.9

109*7112.2____

for ICPFina:

Found

269.50110.50

204.4011.5011.50

1106.0025.50109.8052.40248.40

1145.0029.00

87.801122.00

23.901015.00

108.7044.90

L%R

67,492.1

51.1115-0115.0110.6127.5109.8104.8124.2

114.596.7

109.8112.2

119.5101.5

108.7112.2


flR303-381

U.S. EPA - CLP


Lab Name: WESTON-LIONVILLE Contract: 68-WS-0057





Analyte

AluminumAntimonyArsenicBariumBerylliumcadmiumCalciumChromiumCobaltConnerIronLeadMacrnesiumManaaneseMercuryNickelPotassiumSeleniumSilverSodiumThalliumVanadiumZinc

CRDL S1

True

10.0

3.0

5.0

10.0

zandard foi

Found

9.90

: AA

%R

99.0

True

400.0120.0

400.010.010.0

1000.020.0

100.050.0200.0

1000.030.0

80.01000.0

20.01000.0

100.040.0


148.40

26.80

32.10

112,40

idard 3

%R

123.7

134.0

107.0

112.4

tor ICPFinal

Found

145.70

25.00

32.70

110.80

_%R

121.4

" fcF

125.0

109.0

110.8


flR303382

U.S. EPA - CLP







Analyte


CRDL St

True

10.0

3.0

5.0

10.0

;andard foi

Found

10.00

: AA

%R

100.0

True

400.0120.0

400.010.010.0

1000.020.0100.050.0200.0

1000.030.0

80.01000.0

20.01000.0

100.040.0

CRDL StarInitialFound

idard 1

%R

for ICPFina]

FoundL%R


flR3Q3'383

U.S. EPA - CLP

3BLANKS


Lab Code: WZSTON Case No.: TRC SAS No.: SDG No.: TRC127

Preparation Blank Matrix (soil/water) : SOIL

Preparation Blank Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg) : MG/KG

FORM III - IN 7/87

flR30338I|

Analyte


InitialCalib.Blank(ug/L) C

84.022.02.05.01.03.066.02.04.05.044,03.056.02.00.27.0

723.02.08.391.04.07.05.010.0

UDUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUBUUBUU

Continuing CalibrationBlank (ug/L)

1 C 2 C 3 C

84.022.02.05.01.03.066.02.04.05.044.03.056.02.90.27.0

723.02.04.091.04.05.05.010.0

UUUUUUUUUUUUUBUUUUBUUUUU

84.0-23.32.05.01.03.066.02.04.011.944.03.056.02.90.27.0

723.02.05.991.04.05.25.010.0

UBUUUUUUUBUUUBUUUUBUUBUU

84.022.02.05.01.03.066.02.04.05.044.03.056.02.00.27.0

723.02.05.591.04.05.55.0

UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUBUUBU

-~

Prepa-rationBlank C

16.8004.4000.4001.0000.2000.60013.2000.9800.8001.0008.8000.60011.2000.400

100.0001.400

144.6002.0001.74018.2000.8001.2401.0005.000

UUUUUUUBUUUUUUUUUUBUUBUU

M

PPFPPP

mpppFPPCVPPFPPFPPC

U.S. EPA - CLP

3BLANKS



Preparation Blank Matrix (soil/water): SOIL

Preparation Blank Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg): MG/KG

Analyte



2.0

—

U


1 C 2 C 3 C

84.022.02.05.01.03.066.03.14.05.044.03.0

56.02.00.27.0

723.02.03.691.04.05.05,0

UUUuuuuBUUuuuuuuuuBUUuu

84.0-29.12.05.01.03.066.02.84.05.044.03.0

56.02.00.27.0

723.02.03.291.04.05.05.0

UBUUuuuBUUUUUUUuuuBUUUU

84.0-23.32.05.01.03.066,02.14.05.044.0

88.02.00.27.0

723.02.06.6

127.14.08.95.0

UBUUuuuBUUuBUUuuuBBUBU

Prepa-ration

. Blank C

16.800-7.0000.4001.0000.2000.600

-18.0000.4000.8001.0008.8000.60011.2000.4000.2001.400

144.6000.4001.02018.2000.8001.0001.000

500.000

UBUUUuBUUUUUUUUUuuBUUUUU

M

PPFPPPPPPPPFPPCVPPFPPFPPC

FORM III - IN 7/87

flR303385

U.S. EPA - CLP

3BLANKS



Preparation Blank Matrix (soil/water): WATER

Preparation Blank Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg): UG/L

Analyte



84.022.0

5.01.03.066.02.04.05.044.03.0

194.72.0

7.0723.0

3.0234.2

5.05.0

UU

UUUUUUUUUBU

UU

UB

UU


1 C 2 C 3 C

84.022.02.05.01.03.066.02.04.95.044.03.088.02.00.27.0

723.02.06.6

127.14.05.05.0

UUUUUUUUBUUUBUUUUUBBUUU

2.0

2.0

3.0

2.00.2

2.0

4.05.0

U

U

U

UU

U

UU

2.0

5.0

3.0

0.2

2.0

U

U

U

U

U

Prepa-rationBlank C

84.022.02.05.01.03.066.04.74.05.044.03.0

180.53.1

100.07.0

723.00.43.0

202.74.022.78.0

UUUUUUUBUUUUBBUUUUUBUBB

M

PPFP "PP^

*1PPPFPPCVPPFPPFPP

FORM III - IN 7/87

SR303386

U.S. EPA - CLP

3BLANKS




Preparation Blank Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg) : UG/L

Analyte

AluminumAntimonyArsenicBariumBerylliumCadmiumCalciumChromiumCobaltCopperIronLeadMaqnesiumManganeseMercuryNickelPotassiumSeleniumSilverSodiumThalliumVanadiumZincCyanide


84.022.02.05.01.03.0

66.04.04.05.0

44.03.0

56.03.9

-8.6723.0

3.091.04.0

28.35.0

UuUuuuuBUUUuuB

BU

UuuBU


1 C 2 C 3 C

84.022.02.05.01.03.0

66.02.1

-5.05.0

44.03.0

56.02.0

7.0723.02.03.0

91.04.08.95.0

UUUuuuuBBUUuuuuuuuuuBU

84.0

5.01.03.0

66.0

-6.65.0

44.03.0

56.0

7.0723.02.03.0

91.04.0

5.0

U

UUUU

BUUUU

Uuuuuuu

2.0 U

Prepa-rationBlank C

—

M

PPFPPPPPPPPFPP

PPFPPFPP

FORM III - IN 7/87

flR303387

U.S. EPA - CLP

3BLANKS

Lab Name: WESTON-LIONVILLE Contract.: 68-W8-0057



Preparation Blank Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg) : UG/L

Analyte

AluminumAntimonyArsenicBariumBerylliumCadmiumCalciumChromiumCobaltCooperIronLeadMaanesiumManganeseMercuryNickelPotassiumSeleniumSilverSodiumThalliumVanadiumZincCyanide


84.022.02.05.01.03.0

66.0-2.05.05.044.0

67.72.0

7.0723.02.03.0

91.0

5.05.0

UuUuuuuBUuuBU

UUUUU

UU


1 C 2 C 3 C

84.022.02.05.01.03.0

66.0-5.15.05.0

44.0

97.52.0

7.0723.02.04.8

91.0

5.05.0

UUuuuuuBUUU

BU

UUUBU

uu

-36.8

-2.5

2.0

2.0

5.0

B

B

U

U

U

2.0 U

Prepa-.rationBlank C M

PPFPPPiPPP

PP

PPFPP

PP

FORM III - IN 7/87

SR303388

U.S. EPA - CLP




Preparation Blank Concentration Units .(ug/L or mg/kg): UG/L

Analyte

AluminumAntimonyArsenicBariumBerylliumCadmiumCalciumChromiumCobaltCopperIronLeadMaqnesiumManganeseMercuryNickelPotassiumSeleniumSilverSodiumThalliumVanadiumZincCyanide


22.02.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

12.1

Uu

U

u

u

B


1 C 2 C 3 C

37.82.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

14.1

BU

U

U—

u

B

2.0

2.0

U

U 2.0 U

Prepa-rationBlank C

—

—

M

PF

P_

P

F

P

FORM III - IN 7/87

AR3Q3389

U.S. EPA - CLP

3BLANKS


Lab Code: WESTON Case No,: TRC SAS No.: SDG No.: TRC127


Preparation Blank Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg): UG/L

Analyte



2.0 U

—


1 C 2 C 3 C

2.0

2.0

U

U

2.0

2.0

U

U 2.0 U

Prepa-rationBlank C M

F

4J

F

FORM III - IN 7/87

/IR303390

U.S. EPA - CLP

3BLANKS




Preparation Blank Concentration Units (ug/L or ing/kg): UG/L

Analyte



2.0 u


1C 2 C 3 C

2.0 U 2.0 U

Prepa-rationBlank C

—

—

M

F

—

—

—

—

FORM III - IN 7/87

HR3Q339

U.S. EPA - CLP

4ICP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE



ICP ID Number: ICP61 ICS Source: IV


Analyte


TrueSol. Sol.A AB

581588

523116

186175

535367

520284

482438891

470448433529521

169926

482850516

816

1027

530985

Initial FoundSol. Sol,A AB %R

46104439

800

4136931813-17

170697

43059173

-10-201

69402

135-28

473047.050.5

453.2407.4865.7

426428.0439.8431.7436.0

167257.0

441796.0508.5

801.4-329.4

1007.8345.8

559.4820.2

90.90.0

94.093.097.290.6101.681.683.798.4

91.598.5

98.20.0

98.10.0

105.583.3

Final FoundSol. Sol.A AB %R

45860872

80-1

4079602014-17

165826

42585370

-50

69392

135-27

475192.021.4

458.8407.1861.1

424107.0439.8425.4432.0

163265.0

441284.0494.3

799.9-73.2

998.1335.6

556.0826.1

91.30.0

95.292.996.690.1101.680.482.996.1

91.495.8

98.00.0

97.20.0

104.983.9

FORM IV - IN 7/87

flR303392

U.S. EPA - CLP






Analyte


TrueSol. Sol.A AB

581588

523116

186175

535367

520284

482438891

470448433529521

169929

482850516

816

1027

530985

Initial FoundSol. Sol.A AB %R

484011106

1501

440359131129

183238

44814069

-18-144

-1146

14-30

474551.058.7

470.5453.2944.4

433599.0440.5529.9496.6

180506.0

442459.0502.9

888.5208.7

992.6140.9

45.6985.5

91.20.0

97.6103.5106.092.2101.7100.295.3

106.2

91.697.5

108.90.0

96,70.0

8.6100.1

Final FoundSol* Sol.A AB %R

47233665

151-2

420370161031

178656

43673169

-932

-8-55

19-30

474722.060.5

479.7438.0922.9

422544.0442.1503.7496.5

179201.0

439684.0502.9

878.1369.2

973.7-11.0

452.9974.8

91.20.0

99.5100.0103.689.8102.195.295.3

105.5

91.197.5

107.60.0

94.80.0

85.599.0

FORM IV - IN 7/87

AR3Q3393

U.S. EPA - CLP



Lab Code: WESTON Case No,: TRC SAS No.: SDG No.: TRC127



Analyte

AluminumAntimonyArsenicBariumBerylliumCadmiumCalciumChromiumCobaltCopperIronLeadMaanesiumManaaneseMercuryNickelPotassiumSeleniumSilverSodiumThalliumVanadiumZinc

TrueSol. Sol.A AB

581588

523116

186175

535367

520284

482438891

470448433529521

169926

482850516

816

1027

530985

Initial FoundSol. Sol.A AB %R

46982274

14-1-9

432288191640

168774

44849469

-13-179

-3335

152-13

492447.058.1

464.8461.6904.5

493191.0488.9483.7509.2

184225.0

472200.0350.4

879.5-159.1

935.283.9

618.7945.3

94.60.0

96.4105.4101.5104.8112.991.497.7108.4

97.867.9

107.80.0

91.10.0

116.796.0

Final FoundSol. Sol.A AB %R

46630448

170

-3434333

181642

168711

44570467

-16-40

-4249

140-19

489401.083.4

485.6457.2902.6

485584.0488.0475.4506.1

182942.0

468811.0516.1

881.659.7

947.980.4

590.5941.0

94.10.0

100.7104.4101.3103.2112.789.997.1107.7

97,1100,0

108,00.0

92.30.0

111.495.5

FORM IV - IN 7/87

U.S. EPA - CLP

9 EPA SAMPLE NO.ICP SERIAL DILUTIONS

SB-371LLab Name: WESTON-LIONVILLE Contract: 68-W8-0057


Matrix (soil/water): SOIL Level (low/med): LOW


Analyte


Initial SampleResult (I)

23031.8022.00

24.201.803.00

2421.3042.707.1030.60

26862.70

1488.10144.10

10.701317.70

24.80233,90

61.3052.00

C

uBBUB

B

B

BB

B

SerialDilutionResult (S)

21220.00110.00

25.005.0015.00

2503.5035.5020.0025.00

24600.00

994.00104.50

35.003615.00

15.00455.00

64.0063.50

C

U

uuuBBUU

B

UU

UuBB

%Differ-ence

7.9

100.0100.0

3.416.9

100.0100.08.4

33.227.5

100.0100.0

100.0100.0

4.422.1

Q

E

M

PNRFNRNRNRPPNRNRPFPPCVNRNRFNRNRFPP

FORM IX - IN 7/87

flR303395

LE___________________:—————————————————— Book No,____£J&^L*?^

m Pag* No._,-/ &a —

119$1.2 tl

oo 3.

ll

oc3 I 31 "£-1:1-335

3/300

0/0 i 3/z •< ity /n/c

,/3/7 .'• ' **^ / t • i ' l i

./3«7 ^7

*!•H^l

/.3/>7 ? ?7 7Uc>^ 33 / c

To

iJP

I 335 j <?/f .5/ 3. '.f

f i^r ZfrC, .£?57 .f?t

itnessed It Understood by me. Date Invented by

Recorded JtYHyR303396

Date

T ' ' x*-"" * i * v T U

./ 3/7 .5 SS/

iff§dn& Understood by me, I uate (invented by

'/£/&

W&L.-jM' 003 ./13(* .77/7 .*-i «-» —. .. .•"_

. 7 "3 2-

Record<!dbv flR303397

77.'

^OJV ^,c{, /.?

Book No..

ssed & Understood by me, Date Invented by

Recorded byfipqnQ^QQ

Date

ToP

SHEET———of.CLIENT/SUBJECT

PREPARED BYMATH CHECK BYMETHOD REV. BY

TION ,OFPT

IV DFPT

av OFPT

TASK- unDATF

HATF

HATF

^ . \~~ '

APPROVED BY

HFPT HATF

(j

fcV '

3.1

-3 -<" 22-• — •

/ X ? /f >

/ 7JT /-/;> vr V, r

RFW 10-05-003/A-5/65

SHEET___of.

TASK DFSORIPT10NDDPDADPn RV

MATH CHECK BY ,,....,...METHOD RFV. BY ,„,, ,

*i 3 H 5 *

npPTnPPTHFPT

TAftlf Kin

DATF

HATF

DATP2

c1/- "«! _- ————— -

APPROVED BY *

nFPT HATF

<; P37. ___ .

RFW 10.05-003/*.5/S5' - AR303UOO

RR303301 - semspub.epa.gov

Documents

Transcript of RR303301 - semspub.epa.gov