RQD Range and the Threshold Value - kau

14
J KIl U: Earth Sci , vol. 5, pp. lO'l-l 22 (141 2A .H .l1992 A .D ,) RQD Range and the Threshold Value BAHAA ELDIN H, SADAGAH Faculty of Earth Sciences, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, ABSTRACT. The ROD is the ea sies t method of calculating the dcsingati on of the rock ma sse s for de sign purpose s. The threshold value of IOOmm is used so far to calculate ROD , with no scientific or phy sical basi sfor choos- ing this value , If th e ROD calculation is based on thi s valu e it could give an ambiguous evaluation of the actual ROD of the rock mas s in concern, and different thre sh old values co u ld lead to different ROD' s, In this paper. var- i ous thre sh old values were chosen fro m IOmm to !OOmm to calculate the ef- fect of ROD using a wr itten computer program utilizing Monte Carlo me th od . The crit eri on used in the assessment of thresh old value is its chan ge with the ROD ran ge which is defined as the difference betwe en maximum a nd minimum ROD valu es that occur during a simulation of ROD by Monic Carlo technique . The result appe ar s a s an inverse parabolic relation ship betwe en ROD r ange difference and the threshold value , Thi s research recommend s usc of a thre sh old value. between IOmm to 40mm to calculate the actual ROD of the rock mass which lead to a minimum ex- pected error. Introduction The concept of quantitative description of discontinuities in rock masses is the essen- tial information adequate for the basic engineering design in a rock mass, Rock Qual- ity Designation (ROD) is such a description (Deere 1964 and ISRM 1979). Any value of ROD have long been recognised to be distributed evenly throughout the rock mass, Priest and Hudson (198 I) expressed ROD as a function of the frequency of intact length distribution along a scan line. Palmstrom (1982. 1985) obtained RO D from volumetric joint count and later Kazi and Sen (1985) obtained ROD not influ- enced by number of observations, Distribution of the discontinuity along a scan line was found to follow a log normal distribution by Steffen (1975); Bridges (1975); Barton (1977) and Sen (1984) while Priest and Hudson (1976) and Wallis and King (1980) found that it follows a negative 109

Transcript of RQD Range and the Threshold Value - kau

Page 1: RQD Range and the Threshold Value - kau

J KIl U: Earth Sci , vol. 5, pp. lO'l-l 22 (141 2A .H .l1992 A .D ,)

RQD Range and the Threshold Value

BAHAA ELDIN H, SADAGAH

Faculty of Earth Sciences, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia ,

ABSTRACT. The ROD is the ea sies t method of ca lcula ting the dcsingationo f the rock ma sses for de sign purpose s. The threshold value of IOOmm isused so far to calcula te ROD , with no sc ie nt ific or phy sical basis for choos­ing this value , If th e ROD calculation is based on thi s valu e it could give anambiguous evaluation of the actua l ROD of the rock mas s in concern, anddifferent thresh old values co uld lead to different ROD's , In thi s paper. var­ious threshold values were chosen fro m IOmm to !OOmm to calculate the ef­fect of ROD using a written co m pute r program utilizing Monte Carlome th od . The crit eri on used in th e asse ssme nt of threshold value is itschan ge with the ROD range which is defined as the difference betweenmaximum a nd minimum ROD valu es that occur during a sim ula tio n ofROD by Monic C arlo technique . The result appe ar s as an inverse parabolicrelationship between ROD range difference a nd the threshold value , Thisresearch recommends usc of a thresh old value. between IOmm to 40mm tocalculate the actual ROD of the ro ck mass whi ch lead to a minimum ex­pected error.

Introduction

The concept of quantitative description of discontinuities in rock masses is the essen­tial information adequate for the basic engineering design in a rock mass, Rock Qual­ity Designation (ROD) is such a description (Deere 1964 and ISRM 1979). Anyvalue of ROD have long been recognised to be distributed evenly throughout therock mass , Priest and Hudson (198 I) expressed ROD as a function of the frequencyof intact length distribution along a scan line . Palmstrom (1982. 1985) obtained RO Dfrom volumetric joint count and later Kazi and Sen (1985) obtained ROD not influ­enced by number of observations ,

Distribution of the discontinuity along a scan line was found to follow a log normaldistribution by Steffen (1975); Bridges (1975); Barton (1977) and Sen (1984) whilePriest and Hudson (1976) and Wallis and King (1980) found that it follows a negative

109

Page 2: RQD Range and the Threshold Value - kau
Page 3: RQD Range and the Threshold Value - kau
Page 4: RQD Range and the Threshold Value - kau
Page 5: RQD Range and the Threshold Value - kau
Page 6: RQD Range and the Threshold Value - kau
Page 7: RQD Range and the Threshold Value - kau
Page 8: RQD Range and the Threshold Value - kau
Page 9: RQD Range and the Threshold Value - kau
Page 10: RQD Range and the Threshold Value - kau
Page 11: RQD Range and the Threshold Value - kau
Page 12: RQD Range and the Threshold Value - kau
Page 13: RQD Range and the Threshold Value - kau
Page 14: RQD Range and the Threshold Value - kau