RPT ON GEOL · the degree of Bachelor of Science in Geological Engineering. l am a graduate of...

43E12NE0047 2 .7746 LEDUC 010

REPORT ON THE

GEOLOGY

OF

OXALINE LAKE CLAIMS

TB 768715 A TB 768727

LEDUC TOWNSHIP

THUNDER BAY MINING DIVISION

ONTARIO

NTS: 42EI2

LONGITUDE: 87O35'W

LATITUDE: 49Q42'N

M.F. Cowan

1984 December

RECEIVED

I 1985

LANDS SECTION

42E12NEea47 2 .7746 LEDUC

010C

CONTENTS

LOCATION AND ACCESS

CLAIMS

SURVEY DETAILS

PREVIOUS EXPLORATION

PROPERTY GEOLOGY

MINERALIZATION

REFERENCES

QUALIFICATIONS

MAP, GEOLOGY OF OXALINE LAKE CLAIMS

PAGE

2

2

3

5

6

In pocket

LOCATION AND ACCESS

The Oxaline Lake claims are in Leduc Township, three kilometres northwest of

Jellicoe, along the north side of Oxaline Lake, at longitude 87O35'W, latitude

49042'N. Oxaline Lake is accesible by two kilometres of gravel road from

Highway l l at the gasline pumping station five kilometres west of Jellicoe. The

claims are reached by a short boat trip across the lake.

CLAIMS

The Oxaline Lake property comprises the following thirteen contiguous claims:

TB 768715 to TB 768727 inclusive

The claims are registered in the name of M. F. Cowan, 5196 Sonora Drive, North

Vancouver, B.C., V7R 3V6.

-2-

SURVEY DETAILS

The geological mapping was done by, and the results herewith submitted as

assessment work by:

M.F. Cowan

5196 Sonora Drive

North Vancouver, B.C.

V7R 3V6

The claims covered by the survey are TB 768715 to TB 768727 inclusive.

The mapping was done during the period 1984 August 21 to August 25.

To provide horizontal control for the mapping, a grid was established,

using compass and hip chain, with flagged stations every 25 metres

along north-south lines spaced 100 metres apart. Spacing of the lines

was controlled by an east-west baseline which follows the claim line

extending from the witness post for the number two post of claim TB

768726, westerly to the number three post for claim TB 768719. This

claim line coincides with an old cleared picket line.


Several trenches and pits have been blasted in outcrops on the claims,

as at I400W/0, 200E/340N, and 880E/ION. In 1969 Inco drilled two

holes in diorite presently covered by claim TB 768717. These holes were

collared at approximately I450W/400S and I400W/IOOS. No assays

were reported from this drilling.

-3-

PROPERTY GEOLOGY

The claims are underlain by mafic to intermediate metavolcanic rocks

and diorite and quartz diorite. The metavolcanic rocks predominate in

the northern part of the property and the diorite in the southern part.

Table of Formations

Precambrian

Archean

Intrusive rocks

Diorite, quartz diorite

Metasedimentary rocks

Greywacke, sandstone, siltstone

Metavolcanic rocks

Mafic to intermediate massive flows, tuff, derived schist,

pillow lava

Metavolcanic rocks

Metavolcanic rocks form the predominent bedrock of the northern row

of claims and include mafic to intermediate massive flows, tuff,

derived schists, and rare pillow lava. A good exposure of pillow lava

occurs at 2000W/200N where the pillow structures indicate a vertical

dip to the bedding, with flow tops to the north.

Where tuffaceous, the volcanics generally exhibit a weak to strong

foliation that strikes east-westerly with steep to vertical dips.

Metasedimentary Rocks

Only one exposure of metasedimentary rocks was observed on the

property, at I4IOW/2IOS, along the south shore of Oxaline Lake. The

exposure comprises interbedded greywacke and silty sandstone in

contact with diorite to the south.

Intrusive rocks

Massive diorite and quartz diorite underlies a major portion of the

southern row of claims where it occurs as a fairly continuous, east-

westerly trending body intrusive into the metavolcanics. It occurs

elsewhere scattered throughout the metavolcanics in the form of small

lens-like and plug-like intrusions. Its chemical composition appears to

be similar to that of the metavoicanics, and early in the mapping it was

thought to represent coarse grained flows. However, a number of

exposures showing cross-cutting contact relationships with the fine

grained flows established this unit to be in most cases intrusive in form.

MINERALIZATION

Grab samples of pyritized hornfels taken from the old trench at

880E/ION did not contain any significant amount of gold. A grab

sample of hornfelsized, silicified, and strongly pyritized volcanic rock

taken from the old trenches at 200E/340N, assayed less than 0.001

oz/ton gold.

-5-

REFERENCES

Claim Map G-169, Leduc Township, l inch z 1/2 mile.

Laird, H.C., 1936: The Western Part of the Sturgeon River Area (Sturgeon River -

Beardmore Section); Ontario Dept. Mines Ann. Rept. Vol. 45, p. 2.

Mackasey, W.O., 1976: Geology of Walters and Leduc Townships, District of Thunder

Bay; Ontario Division of Mines Geoscience Report 149 (including Map 2356, Walters

and Leduc Townships, l inch :: 1/2 mile).

- 6-

QUALIFICATIONS

l, Michael F. Cowan, of North Vancouver, British Columbia, do hereby certify that:

l am a graduate of Michigan Technological University, Houghton, Michigan, with

the degree of Bachelor of Science in Geological Engineering.

l am a graduate of Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, with the degree of

Master of Science in Geological Sciences.

l have been professionally involved in mineral exploration since I960.

l personally conducted the geological mapping of the Oxaline Lake claims and

prepared this report.


1984 December M. F. Cowan

--..- .........II11111111111111111142E12NE0047 2.7746 LEDUC 020

REPORT ON A

GROUND MAGNETIC SURVEY

OF

OXALINE LAKE CLAIMS

TB 768715 to TB 768727

LEDUC TOWNSHIP

THUNDER BAY MINING DIVISION

ONTARIO

NTS: 42EI2

LONGITUDE: 87O35'W

LATITUDE:

M.F. Cowan

1984 December

K L

l 1985

G LANDS SECTION

CONTENTS

LOCATION AND ACCESS

CLAIMS


SURVEY DETAILS

RESULTS

CONCLUSIONS

REFERENCES

QUALIFICATIONS

PAGE

l

l

2

3

5

6

MAP, GROUND MAGNETIC SURVEY OF OXALINE LAKE CLAIMS

In pocket

LOCATION AND ACCESS

The Oxaline Lake claims are in Leduc Township, three kilometres northwest of Jellicoe,

along the north side of Oxaline Lake, at longitude 87O35* W, latitude 49O42' N.

Oxaline Lake is accessible by two kilometres of gravel road from Highway 11 at

the gasline pumping station five kilometres west of Jellicoe. The claims are

reached by a short boat trip across the lake.

CLAIMS

The Oxaline Lake property comprises the following thirteen contiguous claims:

TB 768715 to TB 768727 inclusive

The claims are registered in the name of M. F. Cowan, 5196 Sonora Drive, North

Vancouver, B.C., V7R 3V6.


Several trenches and pits have been blasted in outcrops on the claims, as at

I400W/ON, 200E/340N, and 880E/ION. In 1969 Inco drilled two holes in diorite

presently covered by claim TB 768717. These holes were collared at approximately

I450W/400S and I400W/IOOS. No assays were reported from this drilling.

-2-

SURVEY DETAILS

The survey was supervised by, and the results herewith submitted as assessment

work by:

M.F. Cowan

5196 Sonora Drive


V7R 3V6

The claims covered by the survey are numbers TB 768715 to TB

768727, inclusive.

The survey was conducted during the period 1984 August 21 to August

25.

Magnetometer readings were taken and recorded every 25 metres along

north-south lines spaced 100 metres apart. The grid lines and flagged

stations every 25 metres along them were established with hip chain

and compass. An east-west claim line was utilized as a baseline for

grid control.

A canoe was used to take readings on Oxaline Lake. Control of stations

over water was by sighting to stations on land and measuring distances

with a hip chain.

The instrument used in the survey was a McPhar M700 fluxgate magne

tometer which measures the vertical component of the earth's magnetic

field. It measures from zero to * 100,000 gammas in five ranges with a

maximum sensitivity of 20 gammas per scale division on the 1000

gamma range.

-3-

To take a reading, an appropriate scale was selected, and the instrument activated

while hand held and levelled with the operator's shoulders aligned approximately in

a north-south direction.

Readings were taken and recorded at a designated base station at the beginning and

end of each day's traverse in order to reveal any significant diurnal magnetic

variations in the earth's field. The variation in base station readings ranged from O

to 50 gammas over time intervals of approximately eight hours.

In order to minimize the effects of diurnal variations, each time the operator

reached the baseline he would return to the last baseline station and, if any

variation in the magnetics was detected, reset the instrument to the previous

reading, and then establish the new baseline station reading which would be tied

into on the next loop.

RESULTS

The results of the ground magnetic survey are plotted and contoured on the

accompanying map. The magnetic readings ranged from a low of -8000 gammas at

I800W/IOOS to a high of 6800 gammas at 600W/I50S. The contoured magnetic data

shows several weak to moderate anomalies. The most significant anomalies occur

along contacts between the metavolcanics and the diorite. A summary of the

significant anomalies is as follows:

Grid Location Value in Gammas Geological Context

I200E/I50N 2640 In volcanics.

200E/350N 4600 At contact.

0/350N 3800 In volcanics, almost at contact.

200W/350N 3000 At contact.

600W/I50S 6800 At contact.

600W/300N -3900 In diorite, near contact.

700W/300N 3000 In diorite, near contact.

800W/I50S 3800 In diorite, near contact.

-4-

900W/250N

IOOOW/200N

1400W/0

1700W/50S

1800W/IOOS

I900W/IOOS

4100

2800

3400

2600

-8000

3400

In volcanics, near contact.

In volcanics, near contact.

At contact.

At contact.

In diorite, near contact.

In diorite, near contact.

CONCLUSIONS

The ground magnetic survey indicates the Oxaline Lake claims are characterized

by a number of weak to moderate anomalies. With one exception, all the anomalies

occur at or near the contacts between the metavolcanics and diorite and as this

would be a very favorable environment for the development of ore minerals, the

anomalies warrant further investigation.

- 5-

REFERENCES

Claim Map G-1 69, Leduc Township, l inch = 1/2 mile.

Cowan, M.F., !984: Report on the Geology of Oxaline Lake Claims, Leduc

Township, Thunder Bay Mining Division, Ontario; Ontario Ministry of Natural

Resources assessment files.

Laird, H.C., 1936: The Western Part of the Sturgeon River Area (Sturgeon River

Beardmore Section); Ontario Dept. Mines Ann. Rept. Vol. 45, p. 2.

Mackasey, W.O., 1976: Geology of Walters and Leduc Townships, District of

Thunder Bay; Ontario Division of Mines Geoscience Report 149 (including Map

2356, Walters and Leduc Townships, l inch = 1 /2 mile).

-6-

QUALIFICATIONS

l, Michael F. Cowan, of North Vancouver, British Columbia, do hereby certify that:

l am a graduate of Michigan Technological University, Houghton, Michigan, with

the degree of Bachelor of Science in Geological Engineering.

l am a graduate of Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, with the degree of

Master of Science in Geological Sciences.

l have been professionally involved in mineral exploration since I960.

l personally supervised the ground magnetic survey of the Oxaline Lake claims

and prepared this report.


1984 December M. F. Cowan

T#-dfe3Ministryor Report of Work

(Geophysical, Geological,Geochemical and Expenditures) ^ itTy' "1*7^1

Mining Ac

.,,..—.... ,iK , Fr)UC42E12NE8047 2.7746 LEDUC

--r- m . columns - Do not use shaded areas below.

Type of Surveyis

Claim Holder (s)

sAddress

Survey Company

Township or

~7 itt*Js\S H.S*r i~*-. . _ . ,, . ........ _ . f . ^'rospoctor's Licenc* No.

Name and Address^f Author (of Geo-Technical report)

W- ^at^/^^s /^s^**-*

Date of Survey (frorr* 8* to)

Day Mo. Yr. Day | Mo. | Yr.

Total Miles of line Cut

Credits Requested per Each Claim in Columns at rightSpecial Provisions

For first survey:

Enter 40 days. (This includes line cutting)

For each additional survey: using the same orjd:.- . f. . ^

Enter 20 days-(fbr escti) -

;- 1'; ?,Man Days

f r if 1 1' !" ! '* '-'\ Complete re^r-sVifrJe' ' ' ' : :

and enter total (s) here

Airborne Credits

Note: Special provisions credits do not apply to Airborne Surveys.

Geophysical

- Electromagnetic

. Magnetometer

- Radiometric

i VON ;-)Geological

GootWni.csl

Qeophysjcaj,. , .*o. M' i.. i lUw

- 6lectromapnetic

- Magnetometer

- Radiometric

- Other

Geological

Geochemical

Electromagnetic

Magnetometer

Radiometric

Days perClaim

Z-o

3ZDays perClaim

.

Day t perClaim

Mining Claims Traversed (List in numerical sequence)

Expenditures (excludes power stripping)Type of Work Performed

Performed on Claimd)

Calculation of Expenditure Days Credits

Total ExpendituresTotal

Days Credits

* 15 -

InstructionsTotal Days Credits may be apportioned at the claim holder's choice. Enter number of days credits per claim selected in columns at right.

Total number of mining claims covered by this report of work. /*3

Date Recorded Holder or Agent (Signature)

Certification Verifying Report of Work

l hereby certify that l have a personal and intimate knowledge of the facts set forth in the Report of Work annexed hereto, having performed the work or witnessed same during and/or after its completion and the annexed report is true.

Name and Postal Address of Person Certifying

1362 (6U9)

Date Certified Certified by (Signature)

Mining Lands Section

Control Sheet

File NO j?

TYPE OF SURVEY ^ GEOPHYSICAL

~S^ GEOLOGICAL

____ GEOCHEMICAL

EXPENDITURE

MINING LANDS COMMENTS:

Signature of Assessor

Date

1985 03 15 Your Filei 665 Our File: 2.7746

Mining RecorderMinistry of Natural ResourcesP.O. Box 5000Thunder Bay, OntarioP7C 5G6

Dear Madam:

RE: Notice of Intent dated February 21, 1985 Geophysical (Magnetoraeter) and Geological Survey on Mining Claims TB 768715, et. al., In Leduc Township

The assessment work credits, as listed with the above-mentioned Notice of Intent, have been approved as of the above date.

Please Inform the recorded holder of these mining claims and so Indicate on your records.

Yours sincerely,

S.E. YundtDirectorLand Management Branch

Whitney Block, Room 6643 Queen's Park Toronto, Ontario M7A 1U3 Phone:(416)965-4886

S. Hurst:mc

cc: M.F. Cowan5196 Sonora DriveNorth Vancouver, B.C.V7R 3V6

cc: Resident GeologistThunder Bay, Ontario

Encl.

cc: Mr. G.H. FergusonMining 4 Lands Commissioner Toronto, Ontario

y^^v Ministry ot Technical Assess)

VVJ ^ources Work CreditsOntario ^P

merit File 2.7746

AMENDED Date Mining Recorder's Report of

1985 02 21 WorkW 6 65

Recorded HolderM. F. COWAN

Township or AreaLEDUC TOWNSHIP

Type of survey and number of Assessment days credit per claim

Geophysical

Flerrrnmagnetie days

20

Indured polarization days

Other days

Section 77 (19) See "Mining Claims Atsested" column

Geological days

Opnchemipal days

Man days di Airborne d

Special provision HO Ground H

[~l Credits have been reduced because of partial coverage of claims.

l~~l Credits have been reduced because of corrections to work dates and figures of applicant.

Mining Claims Assessed

TB 768715 to 727 inclusive

Special credits under section 77 (16) for the following mining claims

No credits have been allowed for the following mining claims

l _ l not sufficiently covered by the survey l _ l Insufficient technical data filed

The Mining Recorder may reduce the above credits if necessary in order that the total number of approved assessment days recorded on each claim does not exceed the maximum allowed as follows: Geophysical 80; Geological 40; Geochemical 40; Section 77(19) 60:

/is. Ministry oi technical Assess|\y| Natural

Vurces Work Credits

ment F ile2.7746

Date Mining Recorder's Report of

AMENDED 1985 02 21 Work *0 - 6 65

Recorded Holder

M. F. COWANTownship or Area

LEDUC TOWNSHIP


Geophysical

Flertromagnetie days

Magnetometer days

RaHinmetric days

induced polarization days

Other days

Section 77 (19) See "Mining Claims Asiesied" column

40Geological days

Geochemioal days

Man days fi Airborne Lj

Special provision Ixl Ground Ixl

d Credits have been reduced because of partial coverage of claims.

D Credits have been reduced because of corrections to work dates and figures of applicant.


TB 768715 -18-19-22-23-25-26-27


30 DAYS 20 DAYS

TB 768716-17-20-24 TB 768721


1 _ 1 not sufficiently covered by the survey 1 _ 1 Insufficient technical data filed

The Mining Recorder may reduce the above credits if necessary in order that the tota! number of approved assessment days recorded on each claim does not exceed the maximum allowed as follows: Geophysical 80; Geological 40; Geochemical 40; Section 77 (19) 60:

929 IS3,'6)

-i no

Ministry ofNaturalResources

AMENDED

'1985 02 21 Your File: 665 Our File: 2.7746


Dear Madam:

Enclosed are two copies of a Notice of Intent with statements listing a reduced rate of assessment work credits to be allowed for a technical survey. Please forward one copy to the recorded holder of the claims and retain the other. In approximately fifteen days from the above date, a final Tetter of approval of these credits will be sent to you. On receipt of the approval letter, you may then change the work entries oh the claim record sheets.For further information, if required, please contact Mr. R.J. Pichette at 416/965-4888.

Yours sincerely,

y/S.E./undt S* U)icettor

Land Management Branch

Whitney Block, Room 6643 Queen's Park Toronto, Ontario M7A 1W3

S. Hurst:mc

Ends.

cc: M.F. Cowan5196 Sonora Drive North Vancouver, B.C. V7R 3V6

cc: Mr. G.H. FergusonMining S Lands Commissioner Toronto, Ontario

845


Ontario

AMENDED

Notice of Intent

for Technical Reports

2985 02 21

2.7746/665

An examination of your survey report indicates that the requirements of The Ontario Mining Act have not been fully met to warrant maximum assessment work credits. This notice is merely a warning that you will not be allowed the number of assessment work days credits that you expected and also that in approximately 15 days from the above date, the mining recorder will be authorized to change the entries on his record sheets to agree with the enclosed statement. Please note that until such time as the recorder actually changes the entry on the record sheet, the status of the claim remains unchanged.

If you are of the opinion that these changes by the mining recorder will jeopardize your claims, you may during the next fifteen days apply to the Mining and Lands Commissioner for an extension of time. Abstracts should be sent with your application.

If the reduced rate of credits does not jeopardize the status of the claims then you need not seek relief from the Mining and Lands Commissioner and this Notice of Intent may be disregarded.

If your survey was submitted and assessed under the "Special Provision-Performance and Coverage" method and you are of the opinion that a re-appraisal under the "Man-days" method would result in the approval of a greater number of days credit per claim, you may, within the said fifteen day period, submit assessment work breakdowns listing the employees names, addresses and the dates and hours they worked. The new work breakdowns should be submitted direct to the Land Management Branch, Toronto. The report will be re-assessed and a new statement of credits based on actual days worked will be issued.

846 (82/5)

ano


1985 02 13 Your File: 665 Our File: 2.7746


Dear Madam:

Enclosed are two copies of a Notice of Intent with statements listing a reduced rate of assessment work credits to be allowed for a technical survey. Please forward one copy to the recorded holder of the claims and retain the other. In approximately fifteen days from the above date, a final letter of approval of these credits will be sent to you. On receipt of the approval letter, you may then change the work entries on the claim record sheets.For further information, if required, please contact Mr. R.J. Pichette at 416/965-4888.

urs sincerely,

rundt _ 5tor Land Management Branch

Whitney Block, Room 6643 Queen's Park Toronto, Ontario M7A 1W3

JL''j S . Hurst:mc Ends.cc: M.F. Cowan

5196 Sonora Drive North Vancouver, B.C. V7R 3V6

cc: Mr. G.H. FergusonMining X Lands Commissioner Toronto, Ontario

845


Ontario

Notice of Intent

for Technical Reports

1985 02 13

2.7746/665

An examination of your survey report indicates that the requirements of The Ontario Mining Act have not been fully met to warrant maximum assessment work credits. This notice is merely a warning that you will not be allowed the number of assessment work days credits that you expected and also that in approximately 15 days from the above date, the mining recorder will be authorized to change the entries on his record sheets to agree with the enclosed statement. Please note that until such time as the recorder actually changes the entry on the record sheet, the status of the claim remains unchanged.

If you are of the opinion that these changes by the mining recorder will jeopardize your claims, you may during the next fifteen days apply to the Mining and Lands Commissioner for an extension of time. Abstracts should be sent with your application.

If the reduced rate of credits does not jeopardize the status of the claims then you need not seek relief from the Mining and Lands Commissioner and this Notice of Intent may be disregarded.

If your survey was submitted and assessed under the "Special Provision-Performance and Coverage" method and you are of the opinion that a re-appraisal under the "Man-days" method would result in the approval of a greater number of days credit per claim, you may, within the said fifteen day period, submit assessment work breakdowns listing the employees names, addresses and the dates and hours they worked. The new work breakdowns should be submitted direct to the Land Management Branch, Toronto. The report will be re-assessed and a new statement of credits based on actual days worked will be issued.

846 (82/5)

Ministry of Technical Assessment Work Credits

OntarioDate

1985 02 13

File2.7746

Mining Recorder's Report of Workfto. 6 65

Recorded Holder

M. F. COWANTownship or Area

LEDUC TOWNSHIP


Geophysical

20

Other .....days

Section 77 (19) See "Mining Claims Assessed" column

35Geological- - -days

Geochemical . days

Man days CD Airborne CD

Special provision Cxl Ground LXJ

fxl Credits have been reduced because of partial coverage of claims.

CD Credits have been reduced because of corrections to work dates and figures of applicant.


TB 768715 to 727 inclusive



l _ l not sufficiently covered by the survey l _ i Insufficient technical data filed

The Mining Recorder may reduce the above credits if necessary in order that the total number of approved assessment days recorded on each claim does not exceed the maximum allowed as follows: Geophysical 80; Geological 40; Geochemical 40; Section 77(19) 60:

Ontario

Ministry of Natural Resources

GEOPHYSICAL - GEOLOGICAL - GEOCHEMICAL TECHNICAL DATA STATEMENT

File.

TO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORTFACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT

TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION, CONCLUSIONS ETC.

Type of Survey(s). Township or Area.

Claim Holder(s)—.

Survey Company- Author of Report.

Address of Author.

Covering Dates of Survey..

Total Miles of Line Cut.—(linecutting to office)

SPECIAL PROVISIONS CREDITS REQUESTED

ENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first survey.

ENTER 20 days for each additional survey using same grid.

,~, , . , Geophysical

—Electromagnetic—Magnetometer -—Radiometric

—Other ———

DAYS per claim.

Geological.Geochemical.

AIRBORNE CREDITS (Special provision credits do not apply to airborne surveys)

Magnetometer. .Electromagnetic. . Radiometric(enter days per claim)

Author of Report or Agent

Res. Geol.. . Qualifications O O

Previous Surveys File No. Type Date Claim Holder

MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED List numerically

•••••••••••

(prefix)..........Z6.#..z*sr..

(number)

766

TOTAL CLAIMS.

837 (5/79)

GEOPHYSICAL TECHNICAL DATA

GROUND SURVEYS - If more than one survey, specify data for each type of survey

Number of Stations. Station interval —— Profile scale ——^—Contour interval.

.Number of Readings

.Line sparing S&&

ugz;O

Instrument. X??k x ^UxU-g^L, X??-76*0 ^-i^-x-fS.

Accuracy — Scale constant. Diurnal correction method.Base Station check-in interval (hours).

Base Station location and value ~ ay

u•z,oS QQiSU

Instrument .

Toil rnnfigiiration

flnj] separation

Accuracy

Method:

Frernipnov.

C Fixed transmitter d Shoot back CD In line D Parallel line

W

Parameters measured.

O

Instrument

Scale constant

Corrections made.

Base station value and location .

Elevation accuracy.

Z2H

W di

Instrument ——.———-—.

Method CI Time Domain

Parameters On time .

Off time

l l Frequency Domain

_ Frequency _____

_ Range ——-———.—.

— Delay time ———

— Integration time.

Power.

Electrode array —

Electrode spacing .

Type of electrode

SELF POTENTIALInstrument-—.———————-—..——^——....—^—————————^—— Range.Survey Method—^——-——-———^^^-———-——————.——--—.—.——^—^—.———.—^—^

Corrections made.

RADIOMETRICInstrument——.Values measured .Energy windows (levels) ———^^—^^^——^-~—————-^^———^——^^——^————— Height of instrument____________________________Background Count. Size of detector—..—-———^—^^^—-—————.————^————.^.^^——..———^. Overburden ——-—-———————-———-———.—-—-———————.^^^—.———^-^——.—.———

(type, depth — include outcrop map)

OTHERS (SEISMIC, DRILL WELL LOGGING ETC.)Type of survey.——-^^—-——————^^—^^—————

Instrument ______________________.———Accuracy-^-—-———-————-.^^—.-———-————.Parameters measured.

Additional information (for understanding results).

Type of survey(s)——— Instrument(s) —————

(specify for each type of survey) Accuracy———————————^-^^^—

(specify for each type of survey) Aircraft used-—————————^-..^—————.———.———,-—.^^—

Sensor altitude.

Navigation and flight path recovery method.

Aircraft altitude_________________________________Line Spacing—— Miles flown over total area-—^^-^^—^^—^———————.—-—.—Over claims only.

GEOCHEMICAL SURVEY - PROCEDURE RECORD

Numbers of claims from which samples taken.

Total Number of Samples. Type of Sample.

(Nature of Material)

Average Sample Weight_______

Method of Collection———-————

Soil Horizon Sampled. Horizon Development.

Sample Depth———— Terrain^———^—-—.

Drainage Development———————————— Estimated Range of Overburden Thickness.

ANALYTICAL METHODSValues expressed in: per cent

p. p. m. p.p. b.

D d

Cu, Pb,

Others—

Zn, Ni, Co, Ag, Mo, As.-(circle)

Field Analysis (.-Extraction Method. Analytical Method- Reagents Used ——

Field Laboratory AnalysisNo. --—^—.-———

SAMPLE PREPARATION(Includes drying, screening, crushing, ashing)

Mesh size of fraction used for analysis.————

Extraction Method.

Analytical Method.

Reagents Used -——

Commercial Laboratory (-

Name of Laboratory—-

Extraction Method—— Analytical Method ——

Reagents Used —--^—

.tests)

.tests)

-tests)

GeneraL General.

J? ri

y

7

v/

v/

00

3

Oo

N

O

OO

O

o00ON

.

O

SC)

OOO Q) Os

3oO

O

00

3oo

O

Oo

o oo o04

O

OO

ooo o•N

O

O

Ujo o

14J

Oo o

oRUjoo00

Ujoooox

o ooo

3OO

S

4OO

5

/oo

-J

Zo

o

5 y

r/ c

^ "C

fT

Jff X

O A

/

t S

**

LA

KE

:

CL.AI M

o**e,

O.

H) 0

\ a

*-

x

Cb

K

fc

^

fc ^ No! *- o0 - u

-11

i ?a

L*i

D B

S?

Ms

rU il

-

^ PS

v ft * \ *\l\ * A r1u n ^ t t T 4

N?

V*VMl

H

SiX

i \ j w V l i ^

i nhh?g J tJ^i^^Sr r ^ ^ ^ ^ ii J J j ( *

J

o Nftt

^SI

l(jfl

^tf

i3"1jf*B\i

^

\^\

SCir^ •\)*.

vr*

'?

1

l\

1X^

h i

.JJ-uvi

1•J!S

*

^U

tx•.

\**liMl\

1| Q ^

j

t

i.b\•aa

5 flr: t j^ *^ hi

h

S

b

\ f*SJt b

2/00 IV

/ZOO

//OO

/OOO IV

•00 IV

BOO LV

700 IV

5OO IV

too

5OO IV

ZOO LV

/OO IV

O

200 E

zoo E:

5OO

7OO

BOO

900 E

/OOO E

//OO E

/2.3Q E

11 s o- S f

o o(A

N) O O

o oN OD

O Oo

RPT ON GEOL · the degree of Bachelor of Science in Geological Engineering. l am a graduate of...

Documents

Transcript of RPT ON GEOL · the degree of Bachelor of Science in Geological Engineering. l am a graduate of...