53A05NW9707 53A05NW0020 NEAWAGANK LAKE 010

REPORT

ON

MAGNETOMETER, VLF-EM

AND

INDUCED POLARIZATION

SURVEYS

NEAWAGANK LAKE PROPERTY

OF

TEX. U.S. OIL t, GAS INC.

DISTRICT OF KENORA, PATRICIA PORTION

PATRICIA MINING DIVISION, ONTARIO

NTS 53 A/5

GEOCANEX R. GILLICK GEOPHYSICIST April, 1984

:iTABLE OF CONTENTS

53Aa5NW9787 53A85NWee2e NEAWAGANK LAKE

SummaryGeneral Location MapProperty Location MapNeawagank Lake Property MapIntroductionGeologyHistoryPresent ProgramResults and InterpretationConclusions and RecommendationsReferences

LIST OF MAPS AND FIGURES

Fig. l - General Location MapFig. 2 - Property Location MapFig. 3 - Neawagank Lake Property Map

Map l - Total Field MagneticsMap 2 - VLF-EM SurveyMap 3 - I.p. Survey

PAGE

123455668

1012

2T

back of repor t back of report back of report

010C

fWt'.iST'.-

E 1.

SUMMARY

Magnetometer and VLF-EM surveys over newly-staked

additions to the Neawagank Lake property have indicated

a continuation eastward of previously defined iron

formation units.

An induced polarization survey over a known

mineralized zone on the Neawagank property has resulted

in large chargeability anomalies. It is recommended

that this zone be diamond drilled and also that additional

I.P. work be carried out on the Neawaqank Lake property

(estimated cost: SIO.OOO.OO).

1

l l l l l l l l l l l l i l l l ll

2.

HUDSON

BAY

NEAWAGANK LAKE PROPERTY

Moosonee

(f 4-

•^ Belts of Volcanic Rocks

smtTEX. U.S. OIL S GAS INC.

GENERAL LOCATION MAP

OEOCANEX LTDTORONTO. CANADA

BY: R. fi.DAT!

Owa Ne: ' l

if, iy..

t

3.

l

Opapimiskan Lake Discovery

nnummin Lake

NEAWAGANK LAKE PROPERTY

To Ignace {KOmi.)

Belts of volcanic rocks

TEX.U.S. OIL S GAS INC.

PROPERTY LOCATION MAP

crltGEOCANEX LTD

TORONTO. CANADA

*: R C.'r. /M

SCAiC;pj A

KVVi '' '' ' i '

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

li

j l

l

i

Xf4.

lX

- ..y

( )

J

SS

l ' r l )

^ ' \.-S-'~-^'~~\~~\( ~

- i ^-..O i ' .J\ u.y t't!^ *i^ M V'iiif!?/

ifttft i m*'* /'•••t/i*'*'j f* ri V *0V** i**ff*^T i — -- * - - —

NEAWAGANK LAKE

PROPERTY

nilGEOCANEX LTD TORONTO. CANADA

BY: K .d.DATE; M.r./itSCM.J:OWO. Ne: I

5 .

INTRODUCTION

The following report describes ground geophysical

surveys (magnetics, VLF-EM and induced polarization)

carried out by Geocanex over part of the Neawagank Lake

property of Tex. U.S. Oil G Gas Inc. during March, 1984.

The Neawagank Lake property consists of a block

of 34 mineral claims located about 70 miles north-north

east of the town of Pickle Lake, Ontario. The property is

accessible by ski or float-equipped fixed-wing aircraft.

GEOLOGY

The property lies near the eastern end of the

Weagamow-Caribou Lake greenstone belt. Rock types under-

lying the claim group include intermediate to mafic

volcanics and felsic volcanics as well as iron formation,

gabbroic intrusives and minor metcisediments . The strike

of the rocks is generally east-northeast with moderate

to strong foliation parallel to the strike.

Magnetite iron formation, interbedded with mafic

volcanics, strikes across the southern part of the

property.

Several gold-bearing shear zones have been located

on the property in gabbroic rocks. The gold mineralization

is generally associated with quartz veins, arsenopyrite,

minor pyrite and minor chalcopyrite. A grab sample from

one of these zones returned an assay of .42 ounces of

gold per ton.

tHISTORY

In 1941, a gold discovery at Forester Lake,

approximately 4 miles west of the Neawagank Lake property,

precipitated a staking rush in the area. A sample taken

on the property at this time assayed .5 ounces gold

per ton.

Although exploration programs including diamond

drilling were carried out by various mining companies

in the 1960s on ground to the west of the Neawagank

claim group, no work was done on the Neawagank property

at this time.

In late 1981, Geocanex (Toronto) carried out

VLF-EM and magnetometer surveys over the property. During

the summer o f 1 982, the property was geologically mapped

and prospected.

PRESENT PROGRAM

Between the dates of February 29 , and March

13, 1984, inclusive, linecutting as well as magnetometer,

VLF-EM and induced polarization surveying was carried

out over parts of the Neawagank Lake property.

The mileage breakdown for the work performed

is as follows:

Linecutting 2.57 milesMagnetometer Surveying 2.35 milesVLF-EM Surveying 2.35 milesI. P. Surveying 2.10 milts

Personnel involved in carrying out the work

were :

1.

S. Anderson (Rayan Expl . -North Bay) OperatorA. Dickson (Rayan Kxpl. -North Bay) HelperL. Anderson (Rayan Expl. -North Bay) HelperK. Dickson (Rayan Expl. -North Bay) Helper

i The linecutting and magnetometer and VLF-EM

surveys were carried out over newly staked claims at

j the eastern end of the property (claims 629222, 629223,

62922/, ) . These claims were staked in early 1984 to cover

anomalous geophysical trends (magnetics and VLF-EM)

which continued off the original block of claims.

The magnetometer survey was performed using

a Geometrics G-816 proton precession magnetometer with

; a reading accuracy of l gamma. Drift/diurnal correctionsi

were estimated by taking repeat readings at previously

j established stations.

* The VLF-EM survey was conducted with a Phoenix

VLF-2 receiver unit tuned to receive the 24.0 kilohertz

signal transmitted from Cutler, Maine (NAA). Readings

of tilt angle were obtained in degrees and subsequently

modified to percent for plotting purposes.

The induced polarization survey was carried out

over six lines covering gold showings N-l to N-7 (see

Report on Geological Mapping and Prospecting, Neawagank

. Lake Property by H. J. Hodge, August, 1982). The survey

was performed using a Crone time-domain receiver and a two

kilowatt Phoenix transmitter. The survey was conducted

using a pole-dipole electrode array with an 'a-spaclng' of

200 feet and an 'n-value 1 of 1/2. Readings of charge ability, voltage and current were taken at 100 foot station intervals. Apparent resistivities were subse quently computed.

l

RESULTS AND INTERPRETATION

The results of the magnetometer and VLF-EM surveys (see Maps l and 2) indicate a continuation eastward of the iron formational trend associated with VLF conductors A and B as outlined by the 1981 surveys.

The formation appears to consist of two main bands differing somewhat in magnetic signature. The northern band is characterized by general linearity and an apparent width of several hundred feet. Peak magnetic response over this band is a s high as 4900 gammas. VLF conductor A continues on the southern flank of the magnetic response at least as far as line 80 E. Conductor A', running parallel to A, flanks the north side of the same magnetic response from line 76E at least as far as line 92E. Both A and A 1 are interpreted as formational conductors (iron sulfide or graphite) or shears.

The southern band(s) of iron formation is character ized by erratic widths, discontinuity and sharp magnetic peaks (9000+ gammas). This band continues off property to the east of claim 629224 as does associated conductor B.

wThis band of iron formation shows evidence of folding and

faulting in its magnetic signature and should be considered

a prine target for gold mineralization.

' A third zone of high magnetic response appears

j partially defined at the southern end of line 76E. Peak l

amplitudes of up to 5000 gammas strongly suggest that

another band of magnetite iron formation is located here.

A strong magnetic response at the southern end of line 56E

is quite likely part of this band, indicating a strike

j length of at least 2000 feet. Both magnetic anomalies (line

56E and L76E) are associated with v. *ak VLF responses,

j The extended magnetics and VLF-EM coverage indicate

that conductor D weakens considerably to the east and the

J magnetic anomaly just south of this conductor is terminated

at linel

The I.P. survey covered an area just to the west i

of conductor D in which trenching had been carried out and

numerous samples had assayed anomalously high gold values.

Several profiles were also taken over conductor D which

proved to be generally unresponsive.

The results of the survey (see Map 3) indicate a

zone of high chargeability striking northwestwards from

line 76E to line 60E. Peak chargeability amplitudes range

as high as 60 milliseconds. In most cases the chargeability

peaks are associated with resistivity highs indicating the

absence of any continuous conductivity along the zone. On

]:

line 68E the response consists of 2 distinct rhargeability

peaks and on line 64E there are three apparent peaks over

a width of 650 f ey t .

The zone producing the I. P. response shows a

general correlation with a weak west northwest trending

magnetic high. The absence of any associated I. P. response

over the relatively high magnetic peak on line 80E,

however, suggests that the magnetic mineral itself is not

producing the polarization response. It is likely that the

anomalous I. P. response is due to disseminated sulfides

or discontinuous sulfide veinlets or stringers perhaps

within the quartz vein systems which have been observed

in this area.

CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

The magnetometer and VLF-EM surveys have indicated

a continuation eastward of the interpreted zones of iron

formation associated with VLF conductors A G B. Should

diamond drilling indicate gold mineralization in either

of these zones, it is recommended that additional claims

be staked to the east to cover the off-property extensions

of these zones.

The l. p. results indicate a strong response over

a zone known to contain gold mineralization but having no

VLF signature and only weak magnetic response. It is recom

mended that this zone be diamond drilled.

#*'.V 11,' * It is also recommended that additional induced

polarization surveying be carried out over the following

areas:

i 1) line 4E to line 56E from 0+00 to 18+OON

2) line 16E to line 24E from 24+OOS to 36+003

3) line 44E to line 60E from 14+OOS to 44+005

The additional I.R. coverage would involve about

8 miles of survey at an estimated cost of 510,0^0.00.

R-spectfully Submitted,

l R. GillickGeophysicist.

fr-*, l.12,

tREFERENCES:

Report on Geological Mapping and Prospecting Neawagank Lake Property.

by H. J. Hodge, August, 1982.

Report on VLF-EM and Magnetic Surveys Opapimiskan Lake Area Properties of 493217 Ontario Ltd.

by R. Gillick, January, 1982.

"j,: fi"

CERTIFICATE OF QUALIFICATION

I, HARRY J. HODGE, of the City of Toronto, in the Province of Ontario, do hereby certify that:

1. I am a consulting geologist, employed by Geocanex Ltd.

2. I am a member in good standing of the Association of Professional Engineers o k the Province of Ontario.

3. I graduated in 1959 from St. Francis Xavier University with a Bachelor of Science degree, and I have been practicing my profession as a geologist for 26 years.

U, My report is based on a personal examination of the property in 1985 ( and upon a diligent search and review of all available pertinent technical data published by the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, and in the Assessment Records Libraries in Sioux Lookout and Toronto; as well as private company reports

5. In this report I have disclosed all relevant material, descriptive and interpretive, which is to the best of my knowledge, necessary to gain a complete under standing of the viability of the project and the recommendations.

DATED this ^ day of

H.J. Hodge, P.Eng,

c;S3A85NW97e7 53A85NW0028 NEAWAGANK LAKE

Mining Lanes Section

Control Sheet

900

Pile No

TYPE OP SURVEY GEOPHYSICAL

GEOLOGICAL

GEOCHEMICAL

EXPENDITURE

MINING LANDS COMMENTS:

Signature of Assessor

Date

Ontario

Ministry of Natural Resources

GEOPHYSICAL - GEOLOGICAL - GEOCHEMICAL TECHNICAL DATA STATEMENT

TO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORTFACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT

TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION, CONCLUSIONS ETC.

Type of Survey(i) Tox.nhip or Area H&A v/A

Claimt-A/Ci?

S.*-Survey Company.. Author of Report. Address of Author. Covering Dates of Survey 3-9/OrS /^V —

Total Miles of Line

SPECIAL PROVISIONS CREDITS REQUESTED

ENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first survey.ENTER 20 days for each additional survey using same grid.

Geophysical—Electromagnetic.—Magnetometer——Radiometric———Other______

DAYS pcTcUim

Geological.Geochemical.

AIRBORNE CREDITS (SjxeUJ provision crediu do no! *pply lo airborne ntfveyi)

Magnetometer. .Electromagnetic.(enter (Uyi per claim)

SIGNATURE:AuthorW Report or Agent

MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED List numerically

(prefix) (number)

*9 O f T*******.***.*rt*4*.***.***.*

PATRICIA

APR 261984

RCS.GCOI.. .Qualifications.Previous Surveys

File No. Type Date Claim Holder

fy.

TOTAL CLAIMS.

•37 (B/79)

GEOPHYSICAL TECHNICAL DATA

GROUND SURVEYS— Vi more than one survey, specify data for each type of survey

Number of Stations. Station interval —— Profile scale ————

.Number of Readings .

.Line spacing -————

Contour interval.

(J

C

InstrumentAccuracy — Scale constantDiurnal correction method -.Base Station check-in interval (hours). Base Station location and value ___

O ln**riimcnt

Coil configuration

Accuracy —Method:Frequency.

Parameters

Instrument

CI] Fixed transmitter D Shoot back O In line D Parallel line

(ipr-dfy V.L.F. .tjlion)

lo

Scale constant __— Corrections made ——

Base station value and location .

Elevation accuracy.

INDUCED POLARIZATIONRESISTIVITY

Method G/Timc DomainParameters - On time ———

Off time .— Delay time .

[~1 Frequency Domain 3 5Cc. FrequencyC^ S" e C . Ranj-e

— Integration time w 0 ^ s c crf* \AJAr O** ^\. ifiJ *

Vli*j*t* f\i\* c rt^rino ^C ** *S

- IXPOt-Ct

TVDC of elcctrod- . M&fA.lr —— PQ^ ————————————————————————————————————————————

cOntario

ministry or natural ttesources

GEOPHYSICAL - GEOLOGICAL - GEOCHEMICAL TEaiNICAL DATA STATEMENT

TO BZ ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORTf ACTS SHOWN HERZ NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION, CONCLUSIONS ETC.

Type of Surv*y{.) M f -Z H Y- Townihip or Ar^ U fAvJA&A+lK 4AK&

*

CUim

Survey Company

Author of Report Addreu of Amhnr Covering Daf.ei of

A-Ug

~ '3

Total Milei of Line Cut c?- 5"?

SPECIAL PROVISIONS CREDITS REQUESTED

ENTER 40 dayi (includci line cutting) for first survey.ENTER 20 dayi for each additional survey using same grid.

DAYI ptf cUlmGeophysical

—Elcctromagnetic—j^2-—Magnetometer. v-O—Rad'nrr.etric——^——~—Other——————————Geological.Geochemical.

A1RBORNF CREDITS (Sp*riil pn-viiion ortliu do not apply lo *ttnn*

Magnetometer. .Electromagnetic(mer diyi per dal

SIGNATUREAuthor of Report or A|cnt

Res. Geol.. . Qualifications"7

^Previom Surveys

File No. Type Date Claim Holder

MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED Li*t numerically

(prt i)

PATRICIA MINING DIV J

w

6

TOTAL CLAIMS.

37(1/7*1

GEOPHYSICAL TECHNICAL DATA

GROUND SURVEYS — If mor*: than one survey, specify data for each type of survey C

urnocNumber of Stations.'i ' '

Station interval fo/iOQ 'HAG, j /OO - t/6

Profile scale X C *, ^ t 3^0 J*-—————

.Number of Readings

.Line spacing *tt) O /c? e/

"MA4. j A?5~-

Contour interval c? S'O f /OOP

U

C

Instrument 6 g o S*Z T7&-C. S

Accuracy — Scale constant

Diurnal correction method. CrQ P f A)

Base Station chcck-L: interval (hours).

Base Station location md value _

rLff.L.

O

l lO di

Instrument ——- Coil configuration

Coil separation ——

Accuracy ___f /o Method:Frequency.

Parameters

. O

l CAL.

Fixed transiritter- c u.Tt-z.se

Shoot back O In line D Parallel line

TV* . / //t/ -'.pctify

Instrument.

Scale constant.Corrections made —,

Base station value and location —

Elevation accuracy.

C Z

Instrument —..———-— Method D Time Domain

Parameters — On time ——. - Off time ——.— Delay time ——-.— Integration time.

D Frequency Domain

_ Frequency _____ _ Range —-——————

Power.Electrode array — Electrode spacing .

Type of electrode

Report o1 V.o'* (Geopfiysica!, G'\ Geocnemical and t upendituresl

. #11. ' d4'v* c' rt!-tl

" E •jwKJiiu'ri" k'd ion may .n the " E *p**fxJ Day i O " c^*i j

~ Do not uvt- ihftdrd Areal b* to w

i. A K c-- -

-*ClO* t l.c-*^** NO.Claim UaldtrTi)

,- Cj.6T^/ \

Name and Address o' Author lo' Geo Technical report)

Credits Requested per Each Claim in Columns at rightSpecial Provisions

For firn survey:

Enter 40 days (This includes line cutting)

For each additional su-vey: using the same grid:

Enter 20 days (for each)

Man Jays

Complete reverse sideand enter total(s) here

Airborne Credits

Note: Special provisions credits do not apply to Airborne Surveys.

' E let Ir Ofrtjgnf ! ic

- Other

Geological

Geochemical

Geophysical

E lerv omagnei ic

- Magnetometer

. Wad.ometr.c

- Othe*

G*oiov'C*i

G*och*m*e*l

E l*ct*om*gn*uc

M*go*ton-v*i**

W* J*on^4itf tc

D* y t p*x Oaim

O^f^x

D* y t p*' CU-m

.— .. —-.-

Days pv Cairn

———————

MminQ Claims T raversed ( t.ist m numerical sequen -e)

Expenditures ( excludes rower stripping)Type of Work

(***formeO on

Calculation of Cupanditure Day* Credits

Total Expenditure*Total

Days Credits

4- 15

InttructionsTotal Oayt Credits may be apportioned at the claim holder's choice. Enter numbe* of day* credits per claim selected in column* at right.

Mmmp Oa f "P*"0Days C' l P.e'..

Date d*f or Agvnt (

Ortification Verifying Report cj( Work

'-y "i

l hereby certify that l have a personal and intimate knowledge of the facts set forth in the Heport o or witnessed tarn* during and/or after iu completion and the annexed report is true.

Total Pumber of cuj.mt covered by repo't of

Total Days C".j Da,!* Recorded Recorded U^ . * r*, f l

Name and Postal Address^of ferton Certifying

/-

l MM ; t,t l,' J"..'"' i) 1 'I.: l,." C .' f '

O^ly cldyi credits calcuialrd i''i es" section rrwiy tu rr.tvvtl

m the "E*pend. Days Cr." columns. Do not ut* shaded a rea; below.

: of tt ut rysical, Gc

Geochemical and Expenditures!

The Mining Act

^-AT/o-v

3AtoaCo

.~|6*t( ol Survey Hrom 4 to)

--JTotal Mile* o fline C -Jt

Credits Requested pet Each Claim in Columns at rightSpecial Provitiont

For first lurvry:

include! line cutting)

For each additional suivcy:using the vam* ,f .d:

Enter 20 days (for each)

Men Dayi

Complete reverse side end enter total(s) here

Airborne C'eCitt

Note: Special provisions credits do not apply to Airborne Surveys.

Oeophysicel

- Electromagnetic

- Megnetomete'

- Radiorr^etric

- Othei

Geological

Geochemical

Gnophysicel

Etectrorrugnetic

- Magnetometer

- Rad'Ometric

. Other ( l - P)

GtOlOQICell

Gvochtjmic*!

El*CtrOITMQn*1iC

M*gft*tOfT**Jt*f

R**diom*Jtric

O*v* pv O* -m

•— ————

D*yi o*^ O*. m

ao

D*V\ p*r j CUim

Mining Claims Traversed (List in numerical sequence)

Expenditures (excludes power stripping)

MiningPrefix N umber

l—

PATRICIA MIN!

Enpend Dtvt C r.

tt? E D

JG DiV.

Pf*t-

r-—

E *p#nd. v* C'.

CelCulaXHin of Expenditure Oeys C redits

Total Expenditure*

Tot*l numbvr of mining cUirrvs covtr*d by tnit report o f work.

Imt'uctioniTotet Deys Oedits n^ey be apportioned et the cleim holder's choice. Enter number of days credits per c leim selected tn column* et right.

Recorded Holder or Agent ( Signature!

Certification Verifying Report 4* Workl hereby certify thai l have a personal and intimate knowledge of t he facti set ' onfi in tht Rer/orTC or witntwd Mmt during and/or alter in completion a nd the annexed report it true.

I^UoeeftT-: wo' k

Nema and Poitel Addre** o* Per*on Certifying

. 7^3 /a

Assessment Woik Breakdown \

Man Days are based on eight (8) hour Technical or Line-cutting days. Technical days include work performed by consultants, draftsmen, etc..

/p* Of Survey

Technical Technical Oeyt Deyi Credit*

(o O X 7 - V20 *

Line-cutting No. of Oeyi P*' Deyi Tote) C'eOln Oelmt CKim

- lczo * 6" &Y

R-souri ei Ontario G 'rociienncal and Expenditure*)

C.reditt Requested pe( Each Claim in Columns aQright O Mining Claims T ravQMee l List m r.u-iv c oProvitiont

For lull iurv*y: E ttctrom*enrticEnter 40 Jays. (7hn include* line cutting)

For each additional iurvey: tne tame grid:

Enter 20 days (lor each)

Complete reverie tide •nd enter totaMt! here

,^rjr. P 3

Note Special provision)credits do not apply to Airborne Survey*.

Expenditures (excludes power stripping)Type ol Work Performed

Calculation of E*p*ndituia Days C

Total Eapendituret

Inttruction*Total Oayt Oadits may be apportioned tt the claim hoioe r 't

Enter number of days c in columnt at righi.

ific*tion Veritying Report/6? York

K

-3^

V\\cios \\\\\

ornct

•V Suite 7 00 11 Adelaide t, t. Vest or onto, Ontario M5H 1L9

363-A376

rirve o me iNo. a . it JUDOC AVT.

NORTH BAY. ONT. ri A litin. nrooi 474.7*4*

GEOPHYSICAL AND GEOLOGICAL CONTRACT SERVICES

April 24, 1984

Mr. A. HansonMining RecorderP.O. Box 309Court HouseSioux Lookout, OntarioPOV 2TO

Re:

Dear Mr. Hanson:

Assessment credits - Neawagank Lake

l am enclosing two copies of a report of the Geophysical surveys done on the Neawagank Lake property of 493217 Ontario Ltd., for assessment credits. Also enclosed are the necessary forms.

Yours very truly,

JOCANEX LTD.

\

G.B. Barton President

GBB:sh Enclosures

1984 05 10 Your File: Our File: 2.6678

Mr. Albert HansonMining RecorderMinistry of Natural ResourcesP.O. Box 669Sioux Lookout, OntarioPOV 2TO

Dear Sir:

ite have received reports and maps for a Geophysical (Electromagnetic fi Magnetometer) Survey submitted under Special Provisions (credit for Performance and Coverage) on Mining Claims PA 629012 et al in the Area of neawagank Lake.

Thic raaterial will be examined and ar.sor.sod and a statement of assessment work credits will be issued.

We do not have a copy of the report of work whichis normally filed with you prior to the submissionof this technical data. Please forward a copyaa soon as possible.

Yours sincerely,

S.E. YundtDirectorLand Management Branch

Whitney Block, Room 6643Queen's ParkToronto, OntarioM7A 1W3Phone: (416) 965-6918

R. Pichctte:sc

cc: 493217 Ontario Limited Suite 910 40 University Ave Toronto, Ont M5J 1T1

cc: Geocanex Limited11 Adelaide Street W Suite 700 Toronto,- Ontario M5H IL9

f

MAP (5)

LOCATE bC-ftAMEL /W

5EQU.EHCB (X)

ANSHOWING

AREA COVERAGE OF EXPLORATION WORK REPORTED BY THE MINING INDUSTRY

TOWNSHIP: 5

AREA:

NTS UNIT .53JLATITUDE:LONGITUDE:

53A/I2SW

LEGEND:

Claim line: Claim post: Witness post: 1981 Grid line 1984 Grid line

; -0- (assumed)

Instrumentation: Geometrics G -81 6 ProtonPrecession Magnetometer

Data contoured at: O, 250,500,750, 1000, 2000, etc. gammas

Plotted value = Field value minus 60,000 gammas

Approximate location of gold showing

W -003,0

TEX US. OIL a GAS INC.

NEAWAGANK LAKE PROPERTY

TOTAL FIELD MAGNETICS

GEOCANEX LTD TORONTO, CANADA

53AeSNW9707 53A05NW0020 NEAWAGANK LAKE

UJ Uj Ui

UI

Z

UJruiZ

T. L r"i

*/* ffitii

•z*

•***

^f/f

•f/o m?, t

\l

\•K

4*

*-5'

*Y

i l*** fi* -

**5

B L. O

*i3

/At

/Jo

**7

*/*

-^X^

-t/fl

——————— a-

" V*i N*-j, \

Lj H ~ L/

V 4,*0. ** ^•/t \ **

MS *'7

+ I* .litj

** vV*ro

• *-*-^fc *it

L ^ * ^17-" XA *- -,r

-f ^ -/a

\-i '-/Y

\

\' ) ?'\ rj*Y X - "-/v.^-^ -^ - *0^..to-5*1-10 V

-'A -/*

b

eutt H

tt

\a

n

W

fi

**

^

- *

-0

-*

-5

-J

r J

- A

f

-L.

-/v l(tf J-sq--8 Vi

-t -i 3• •^v

-a -tV

V/o -'t

T "-* ^(r

-* -, v/j

-/* -t 19

-i X &S-8 ; ^jfl

- C

\i"-

*. (

\

.

-

.

--, v-5 ^

-v ^,-h

^^r ^"'* ^Lr/'-/V* ^Vvo

x1

( ---(5 ' y j/j^

^ rJ-fY - t Joi.,, X -,/—— 4': x'- \-J ~/\-i -i^ ^1 -f X ^/t"0 1/ ' ;-'*- y -*i-/j. ;

v. 7 -*y^

7X

X

N

M

\

'^

T L

40 * 00 N

20*00 N

*?T

t/3)

*Z7 -BX—r'*LEGEND:

j— -O/

V L F Conductors:

NEAWAGANK

B.L. 00

Lakeshore: 1981 Grid Line: 1984 G rid Line:

Instrumentation

Transmi 11er:

Geonics EM-16 (1981 survey) Phoenix V LF-2 { 1984 survey)

Cutler, Maine (NAA)

Reading direction; Southwards

PI o t ti ng Scheme:

-40Y. O +40V*

magnetic correlation

Without magnetic correlation:

n-phase

too 7*0 4M

Plotting Scale:

1 cm. z i 20 Y.

- '"Y

Quadrature

IM **o /oo O 800 F t.

Approximate location of gold showing

TEX.U.S. OIL S GAS INC.

NEAWAGANK LAKE PROPERTY

VLF SURVEY

GEOCANEX LTD TORONTO, C ANADA

BY: R. G.DATE: Mar. X 84SCALE: V - 4 00'MAP No; 2

53AeSN*9707 53Aa5NW0020 NEAWAGANK LAKE 210

o en

Oen rsi LD

UJ

O LO

-J

Claim line C lai m post D

Instrumentation'Receiver - Crone (time-domain) Transmitter- Phoenix IPT1 (2 kW}

Survey parameter s :Arra y - Pole - dipolea^200 ft, (unless otherwise specifiedn --Ml ( "

PI ot t ing schemeVO

tax.

20

SK

o msec, -n -m.

Chargeabi l it yAB.

Apparent Resistivity

20*00 N

10*00 N

B. L. 00

w Ft.

TEX. U.S. OIL 8, GAS INC.

NEAWAGANK LAKE PROPERTY(DETAIL)

I. P. SURVEY

EOCRNEK"GEOCANEX LTD

TORONTO, CANADA

BY: R G.DATE: MarSCALE: 1" :200'MAP N o: 3

53A05NW9707 53AB5NW0B2a NEAWAGANK LAKE 220 J.