RECEIVEDDEC 1 8 199?

GEOSCIENCE ASSESSMENT! OFFICE l

REPORT ON

GEOPHYSICAL WORK

WARK 12 GRIDWARK TOWNSHIP

NTS:42-A711 PROJ#:8132

FOR

FALCONBRIDGE LIMITED

2.18003

DECEMBER 1997 D. LONDRY TIMMINS GEOPHYSICS LTD.

42A11NW0074 2.18003 WARK 010

SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS

HLEM and magnetic surveys were carried out over the Wark 12 property for Falconbridge Limited in

November 1997.

The magnetic survey outlined two areas of higher magnetic field which are believed to be underlain by

volcanics. The HLEM survey outlined three bedrock conductors. Anomaly 'A' and 'B' appear to have been

the target of holes drilled by Hollinger in 1974; the conductivity is due to graphite close to the contact

between sediments and volcanics. Anomaly 'A' should be tested on Line 1100 South where, although the

EM anomaly is poorly defined, the magnetics are the strongest. Anomaly 'C' is a questionable response

in the high frequency results and it is recommended that the grid is extended to the north and east to better

define this anomaly.

I by (j

TABLE OF CONTENTS

page

SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS............................................................................................ i

INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................................ 1

GENERAL GEOLOGY........................................................................................................................ 1

PREVIOUS WORK............................................................................................................................ 3

SURVEY DESCRIPTIONS................................................................................................................. 5

MAGNETIC RESULTS....................................................................................................................... 5

HLEM RESULTS................................................................................................................................ 7

REFERENCES................................................................................................................................... 10

42A11NW0074 2.18003 WARK 010C

LIST OF MAPS

1. MAGNETIC RESULTS (BACK POCKET)

2. HLEM RESULTS, 160 M COIL SEPARATION, 444 Hz (BACK POCKET)

3. HLEM RESULTS, 160 M COIL SEPARATION, 1777 Hz (BACK POCKET)

LIST OF FIGURES

page

1.(a) LOCATION MAP....................................................................................................................... 2

(b) CLAIM MAP............................................................................................................................... 2

2. APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF PREVIOUS DRILL HOLES ......................................................... 4

3. COLOUR IMAGE OF TOTAL MAGNETIC FIELD .......................................................................... 6

4. HLEM RESULTS, 1777 HERTZ, 160 M COIL SEPARATION ........................................................ 8

LIST OF TABLES

page

1. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION........................................................................................................... 1

2. SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS WORK ................................................................................................. 3

INTRODUCTION

Magnetic and horizontal loop electromagnetic (HLEM) surveys were carried out on the Wark 12 property

for Falconbridge Limited during November of 1997.

The property is located approximately 17 kilometres north of the city of Timmins (Figure 1(a)) in the

Porcupine Mining Division. It was accessed from Highway 655 which cuts through the southwest corner of

the property.

The grid on the property covered part of claim 1203786 which consists of 8, forty acre claim units in the

south half of Concession l, Lots 9 and 10 (Figure 1(b)).

The magnetic survey was run by C. McKay and the HLEM survey was carried out by B. LeRoy and the

author of this report.

CLAIM*

1203786

# of UNITS

8

DESCRIPTION

NE1/4, S1/2, Con IV, Lot 8

TOWNSHIP

Wark

Table 1 : Property Description

GENERAL GEOLOGY

The geology of Wark Township was first mapped by Berry (1939) as part of eight townships comprising

the Bigwater Lake area. Most recently, Berger (1994), mapped Murphy and Wark Townships at a scale of

1:20,000.

The geology of Wark Township consists of Archean ultramafic to felsic metavolcanics and clastic

metasediments which have been intruded by ultramafic, mafic and felsic plutonic rocks and Nipissing

diabase dikes (Berger, 1994).

The Wark 12 property is underlain by north northeast to north northwest striking volcanics which are

surrounded by sediments. Previous drilling intersected graphitic horizons close to the contact between the

Figure l(a) : Location Map

MURPHY TOWNSHP

Figure Kb) : Claim Map

sediments and volcanics. Minor zinc mineralization was noted in a lot of the holes.

PREVIOUS WORK

The following is a description of previous exploration work carried out on the property (Table 2).

YEAR

?

1973

COMPANY

Bruce-Presto

Hollinger Consolidated Gold Mines

GEOPHYSICS DRILL HOLES

A1 to 4

VA1 to 14

ASSESSMENT FILE

T-3293

T-2702

Table 2. Summary of previous assessment work.

In the early 1970's, Hollinger Consolidated Gold Mines Ltd. carried out an exploration program in Wark

Township on ground held by Victoria Algoma. The program included EM and magnetic surveys over the

south half of Concession l, Lots 9 and 10 and the north half of Concession l, Lot 9. The surveys were run

on lines spaced every 200 feet and oriented at 90 degrees Az. and 60 degrees Az. A number of holes were

drilled to test EM anomalies, four of which are located within the present survey area.

Four holes were drilled directly to the east and north of the present survey area by Bruce-Presto. The

exact year of this work is unknown to the author.

In 1988, the Ontario Geological Survey (OGS, 1988) conducted a combined airborne magnetic and

electromagnetic survey in the Timmins area which included Wark Township. The survey was flown along

north-south lines spaced approximately every 200 metres.

Murphy Township

Figure 2: Approximate Location of Previous Drill Holes

SURVEY DESCRIPTIONS

A north-south base line, designated 14000 East was established at the boundary between Lots 9 and 10

and east-west grid lines were cut every 100 metres and picketed every 20 metres (Figure 1(b)). Tie lines

were also established at 13600 and 14400 East.

The magnetic readings were taken every 10 metres with a Scintrex IGS-2/MP-4. This instrument is a

proton precession magnetometer which measures the earth's total magnetic field to an accuracy of 0.1

gammas. Diurnal variations were monitored every 10 seconds with a Scintrex MP-3 base station

magnetometer which was located off the property at 10200 East, 10360 North; the base station value, to

which all of the readings were levelled to, is 59237 nT.. A total of 962 readings were taken along 9.5

kilometres of line.

The horizontal loop EM survey was carried out with the Apex Parametrics MaxMin I-5. This instrument

measures the in-phase and quadrature components of the secondary field as a percentage of the primary

field; the depth of penetration is approximately half of the coil separation. Readings were taken every 20

metres along all of the grid lines using a coil separation of 160 metres and frequencies of 444 and 1777

Hertz. A total of 338 stations were sampled along 7.7 kilometres of line.

MAGNETIC RESULTS

The magnetic results are posted and contoured every 25 nT on Map 1 at a scale of 1:5000. A colour

image of the total magnetic field is also given in Figure 3 at a scale of 1:10,000.

Two areas of high magnetic field were outlined in the survey area. One trends north northeast between

13600 East on Line 1400 South and 13800 East on Line 900 South. This low amplitude anomaly is believed

to reflect volcanics which were intersected in Holes 6,12 and 13, drilled by Hollinger in 1974. The second

area of high magnetic field is located in the northeast corner of the survey area. This much higher response

i Bouchard ^\ \ \ s~^ L BOO

Lake

IGS-2/MP-4

oton Precession

Big rid

Instrumenivsc

Type : Total Fielfl P

Gridded By : Geosoft

Cell SizeXjn) metres

Filter : 1 Pass 9

Contour Interval ; — —— HLEM

Scale : 1:10.000

Figure 3 : Colour Image of Total Magnetic Field, Wark 12 Grid

is also believed to reflect volcanics .

HLEM RESULTS

The results of the HLEM survey are given in maps 2 and 3 at a scale of 1:5000; the profile scale is 1cm

= 200Xo for both frequencies. The results are also presented in Figure 3 at a scale of 1:10,000. The readings,

particularly in the low frequency results, are quite noisy because of the power line on the west edge of the

survey area.

Three bedrock conductors, labelled 'A1 , 'B1 and 'C' on the maps, were detected in the survey.

Anomaly 'A' represent a faulted or tightly folded zone of conductivity which strikes north northeast from

13620 East on Line 1200 South to 13780 East on Line 800 South. The anomaly is difficult to interpret

because of the noise level and the low amplitude , however, the fact that the anomaly is only a quadrature

response in the low frequency results indicates a very poor conductivity.

This anomaly was tested by Holes VA5-6, 12 and 13, all of which intersected graphitic sediments. It

should be tested on Line 1100 South where, although the EM anomaly is poorly defined, the magnetics are

the strongest.

Anomaly 'B1 strikes north northwest from 14340 East on Line 1400 South to 14080 East on Line 900

South and north-south between Lines 900 and 800 South. This anomaly also has very little in-phase

response in the low frequency results which suggests a very poor conductivity. It is located along the west

flank of a high magnetic anomaly which is believed to represent intermediate to mafic volcanics.

This anomaly was tested by Hole VA5-2 to the north of the present sgrid and Hole VA5-11 on Line 1400

South; both of these holes also intersected graphitic sediments.

Anomaly 'C* is a questionable anomaly in the high frequency results at 14240 East on Lines 800 and 900

Mv^/

ifa&os

L 1300 S

Murpmy Township

:GEND

Fre^Wfency : 1777 Hertz

Profile Scale

Instrument : Max Min I-5

Coil Separation : 160 metres

1cm = 40?5———— In-Rhase

— - — - Quadrature

Scale : 1:1o[oOO

Figure 4 : HLEM Results, 1777 Hertz, Wark 12 Grid

9

South. It is located in an area of high magnetics and does not appear to have been tested by diamond

drilling. The grid should be continued to the east and north to map the extent of this anomaly.

____^^ ^ ^ ____^-7 DATE ~'' 7 /D. LONDAV

)PHTIMMINS GEOPHYSICS LTD

10

REFERENCES

BERGER, B.R.1994: Precambrian Geology, Murphy and Wark Townships; Ontario Geological Survey, Preliminary

Map P. 3305, scale 1:20,000.

BERRY, L.G.1941: Geology of the Bigwater Lake Area; Ontario Department of Mines, Vol. 48, Part 12, pp. 1 -11.

JACKSON, S.L. and FYON A.J.1991: The Western Abitibi Subprovince in Ontario; in Geology of Ontario, Ontario Geological Survey,

Special Volume 4, Part 1, E.G. Pye Editor, pp.405-484.

ONTARIO GEOLOGICAL SURVEY1988: Airborne Electromagnetic and Total Intensity Survey, Timmins Area, Wark Township, Districts

of Cochrane and Timiskaming Ontario; by Geoterrex Limited, for Ontario Geological Survey, Geophysical/Geochemical Series Map 81063. Scale 1:20,000. Survey and compilation from March 1987 to October 1987.

Pyke, D.R., Ayres, L.D. and Innes, D.1973: Timmins-Kirkland Lake Sheet; Ontario Division of Mines, Geological Compilation Series, Map

2205, scale V^4 m iles.

Ministry ofNorthern Development

d MinesDeclaration of Assessment Work Performed on Mining Land

Mining Act, Subsection 65(2) and 66(3), R.8.O. 1990

Transaction Number (office use)

Assessment Files Research Imaging

Personal information collected on this form is obtained under the authority of subsections 65(2) and 66(3) of the Mining Act. Under section B of the

Mining Act, the information i nd correspond with the mining land holder.

Questions about this colk ||||||||||||||||||||||li|||||I *n Development and Mines, 6th Floor,

933 Ramsay Lake Road, Si

Instructions: - For v - Pleas.

42A11NW0074 2.18003 WARK 900 form 0240.

1. Recorded holder(s) (Attach a list if necessary)Name ^s

FALCoV bfaQG-S ^~TDAddress

S'lM I/^A 0 Aj IH ~n4 ^ (JE-

\l kw y\ ^A } P^A J "7/^9^1^5" L-J I \J 1 ' ' v ' '7 (

Name '

Address

Client Number — ~

13 o 7 6Telephone Number

Fax Number

Client Number

Telephone Number

c/

ss3?0

Fax Number

2. Type of work performed: Check ( s ) and report on only ONE of the following groups for this declaration.

r— v/Geotechnical: prospecting, surveys, i — i Physical: drilling, stripping, i — i Rehabilitation L^-1 assays and work under section 18 (regs) ' — ' trenching and associated assays ' — '

Work Type

^ Cr r D j Ct (2 \J CE YPeJtorr^T From O^ li 1

Day Month YM

Global Positioning System Data (if available)

? TO /M i I t 13-u Day | Month Yeaf

Township/Area

^LJ) — CiJ X^ftj^ '7~^Ur

M or G-Plan Number

U~ ~ O l v 1

Office Use

CommodityTotal S Value of Work Claimed

NTS Reference

Mining Division Pg^jjty^j^

Resident Geologist District

Please remember to: - obtain a work permit from the Ministry of Natural Resources as required;- provide proper notice to surface rights holders before starting work;- complete and attach a Statement of Costs, form 0212;- provide a map showing contiguous mining lands that are linked for assigning work;- include two copies of your technical report. f\ *z ^. ,-va o u

3. Person or companies who prepared the technical report (Attach a list if necessary)

Name

oTelephone Num

AddressAU ]E

Fax Number

Name Telephone Number

Address Fax Number

Name

Addre

Telephone Number

Fax Number

l,

GEOSCIENCE ASSESSMENT OFFICE

______________ , do hereby certify that l have personal knowledge of the facts set^ (Print Name)

forth in this Declaration of Assessment Work having caused the work to be performed or witnessed the same during

or after its completion and, to the best of my knowledge, the annexed report is true.

5, Work to be recorded and distributed.the mining land where work was performed, must accompany this form.

Work can only be assigned to claims that are contiguous (adjoining) to . at the time work was performed. A map showing the contiguous link

Mining Claim Number. Or if work was done on other eligible mining land, show in this column the location number indicated on the claim map.

eg

eg

eg

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

TB 7827

1234567

1234568

l Z^3?ST

/ ?O tt *7j#

Number of Claim Unite. For other mining land, list hectares.

16 ha

12

2

^

H

Column Totals

Value of work performed on this claim or other mining land.

S26, 825

0

S 8, 892

J Zz^t o

? szss

Value of work applied to this claim.

N/A

324,000

S 4,000

^ !,Zov? I6oo

r** r~x"^r

Value of work assigned to other mining claims.

S24,000

0

0—Jt ——————— a / x*"

f o

•n/r-mritL/t:! v t.i^

r\rr 4 o 1QQ?Ss" LL.O 1 0 I33i y

GEOSCIENCE]ASSESSMENT — ———— eff^ ———— '

~n ——

IVL

~tu^ —

Bank. Value of work to be distributed at a future date.

S2.825

0

S4.892

f i^sf O

t.y HWl, c-c®

J, do hereby certify that the above work credits are eligible under

(Print Full Name)

subsection 7 (1) of the Assessment Work Regulation 6/96 for assignment to contiguous claims or for application to the claim where the work was done.Signature of Recorded Holder or Agent Autl l in Writing Date

6. Instructions for cutting back credits that are not approved

Some of the credits claimed in this declaration may be cut back. Please check ( v ) i n the boxes below to show howyou wish to prioritize the deletion of credits:

D 1. Credits are to be cut back from the Bank first, followed by option 2 or 3 or 4 as indicated. D 2. Credits are to be cut back starting with the claims listed last, working backwards; or D 3. Credits are to be cut back equally over all claims listed in this declaration; or D 4. Credits are to be cut back as prioritized on the attached appendix or as follows (describe):

Note: If you have not indicated how your credits are to be deleted, credits will be cut back from the Bank first, followed by option number 2 if necessary.

For Office,Received Si

OED 17

0241 (02/96) PORCUPINF

Deemed Approved Date

Date Approved

Date Notification Sent

Total Value of Credit Approved

Approved for Recording by Mining Recorder (Signature)

Ontario Ministry ofNorthern Developmentand Mines

Statement of Costs for Assessment Credit

Transaction Number (office UM)

Personal information collected on this form is obtained under the authority of subsection 6(1) of the Assessment Work Regulation 6/96. Under section 8 of the Mining Act, the information is a public record. This information will be used to review the assessment work and correspond with the mining land holder. Questions about this collection should be directed to the Chief Mining Recorder, Ministry of Northern Development and Mines, 6th Floor, 933 Ramsey Lake Road, Sudbury, Ontario, P3E 6B5.

Work Type

L. i n f CM. T] \y\c\

^Eo/0/m/cVf*fe 5"6iftlXElT

Units of WorkDepending on the type of work, list the number of hours/days worked, metres of drilling, kilo metres of grid line, number of samples, etc.

1 . (p A^fUy

^, 6 iU*? Ar-5

Associated Costs (e.g. supplies, mobilization and demobilization).

G

Transportation Costs

Tritcc/L A*J*J Q) (rfa

Food and Lodging Costs

Cost Per Unit of work

tf 265.00

f 2 Z "5. ooJr ^ 9 ?O. O&

Total Cost

i 25wf zmi ICO'OO

\D no ci wen ncL/cH V til ' ' —————

\DEC \ 8 19S7

EOSCIENCE ASSESSM DFFIHF

t ̂ 0. 00

Total Value of Assessment Work

O : -:, ^ .'*V * , -. .y :; ':

Calculations of Filina Disennnts- v' A

ffi\J

ENT

f VO-ot.

^aryJ ^

~\. Work filed within two years of performance is claimed at 1000Xo of the above Total Value of Assessment Work. 2. If work is filed after two years and up to five years after performance, it can only be claimed at 500xb of the Total

Value of Assessment Work. If this situation applies to your claims, use the calculation below:

TOTAL VALUE OF ASSESSMENT WORK x 0 .50 Total S value of worked claimed.

Note:- Work older than 5 years is not eligible for credit.- A recorded holder may be required to verify expenditures claimed in this statement of costs within 45 days of a request for verification and/or correction/clarification. If verification and/or correction/clarification is not made, the Minister may reject all or part of the assessment work submitted.

Certification verifying costs:

i, c((pl

C'' , do hereby certify, that the amounts shown are as accurate as mayplease print full name)''

reasonably be determined and the costs were incurred while conducting assessment work on the lands indicated on

the accompany!!

to make this cer?with signing authority) '

— l am authorized

0212 (02/96)

it ion.OED ir wu Q {

^ORCUPINE MINING DIVISIONSignatun Date

Ministry ofNorthern Developmentand Mines

Ministere du Developpement du Nord et des Mines

March 5, 1998

Greg CollinsFALCONBRIDGE LIMITEDSUITE 1200, 95 WELLINGTON STREET WESTTORONTO, ONTARIOM5J-2V4

OntarioGeoscience Assessment Office 933 Ramsey Lake Road 6th Floor Sudbury, Ontario P3E 6B5

Telephone: (888)415-9846 Fax: (705) 670-5881

Dear Sir or Madam:

Subject: Transaction Number(s):

Submission Number: 2 .18003

StatusW9760.00763 Approval

We have reviewed your Assessment Work submission with the above noted Transaction Number(s). The attached summary page(s) indicate the results of the review. WE RECOMMEND YOU READ THIS SUMMARY FOR THE DETAILS PERTAINING TO YOUR ASSESSMENT WORK.

If the status for a transaction is a 45 Day Notice, the summary will outline the reasons for the notice, and any steps you can take to remedy deficiencies. The 90-day deemed approval provision, subsection 6(7) of the Assessment Work Regulation, will no longer be in effect for assessment work which has received a 45 Day Notice.

Please note any revisions must be submitted in DUPLICATE to the Geoscience Assessment Office, by the response date on the summary.

If you have any questions regarding this correspondence, please contact Lucille Jerome by e-mail at jeromel2@epo.gov.on.ea or by telephone at (705) 670-5858.

Yours sincerely,

ORIGINAL SIGNED BYBlair KiteSupervisor, Geoscience Assessment OfficeMining Lands Section

Correspondence ID: 1 1998

Copy for: Assessment Library

Work Report Assessment Results

Submission Number: 2 .18003

Date Correspondence Sent: March 05, 1998______________________AssessorLucille Jerome^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transaction First ClaimNumber Number Township(s) l Area(s) Status Approval Date

W9760.00763 1203787 WARK Approval March 04, 1998

Section:

14 Geophysical MAG 14 Geophysical EM

In all future submissions, the geophysical maps must be submitted in black and white so that they can be more easily scanned for the geoscientific database. All GPS data collected should be reported if you are claiming the costs.

Correspondence to: Recorded Holder(s) and/or Agent(s):Resident Geologist Greg CollinsSouth Porcupine, ON FALCONBRIDGE LIMITED

TORONTO, ONTARIO Assessment Files Library Sudbury, ON

Page: 1Correspondence ID: 11998

t

o J j} p i ?*

o o B f I' Tl 5*

•f ifi 1 "T ri1 . en z u c 33

•n O m 31 1

'/i ~TI G i /i L. Tl ri ni 5 T. o z "*

l"l "'

'T r''

b

i;..l i.; S 33 C) I CO O Z

:; (^

u ^ ^f "H O D W fe 15 12

2388

r?^|3

r^3l5

r^H

55||c7i

•Dr"

"*'

2O

o

S

~i

O

^9 n

zQ

iw^

mfi

if1

; OW

NS

HIP

G-2

883

••H

.J v. y

X T

1111'

r A'\

o i

r'i

1,11,

nir

.m i

ni.

Ml

.1 il

l!l/

*'-

li

O

d.

C; ri: T)

uIT

M;/

y K

J.

r,

t,

r" 'Tl

: rr Z

n :-

C

r11

-n

Z

s

J.J "

J*

^

Ti

Tm

f,;

Ci

^

)

,LI

v- ;o

m

p

t''

<

^ * '

^ 5

g *

to

~ oo

i

;-•)

^ O

w

r,

•' T

; o

i'-

, -

? i -H

C/

1 /

l i

l

KS

**l

i.'H

U it

VH

HI J

il "W

M

, t

mi

t/1

..-•Jf

42A1

1NW

0074

2.1

8003

WAR

K20

0

1203787

OoTOTSojrigiooo wCToBBoort tS W cSi [M S W rirt PS rt ri Hffl PS n r*S

Bouchard

l l l t l l l Ml l t l l l l l

L 1X00 S \ MM l l l l t 't' t"fr t M l M l l l l V \ l l l l M l l H-t-M h\t'"H ) t l l l l l l l M l l l l l

Wark/TownisKip

Murphy Towns

INDEX MAP

Scale : 1 :250,000

LEGEND2. coe

Instrument : Scintrex IGS-2/MP-4

Type : Total Field Proton PrecessionDatum Level : 59000 nTContour Interval : 25 nT

Gridded By : Geosoft Btgrid

Gel! Size : 10.0 metres

Filter : 1 Pass 9 Point Manning

— —— EM Anomaly, 444 Hertz

42A1 1NW0074 2.1B003 WARK 210

CLAIM POSTS

H Located

D Unlocated

100 m 200 m 300 m—

Scale : 1:5000

400 m 500 m

FALCONBRIDGE LIMITEDMAGNETIC SURVEY

WARK 12

WARK TOWNSHIPFile : W12.XYZ

NTS: 42-A/11

Date : December, 1997

Proj l 8034

WORK BY : Timmins Geophysics Ltd. l

s

203787

Bouchard

1 VfYl ^ \ *-a*—*-*L IZyVJ o \ i i i ri-r-n

WarkxTowmsKipJ-i-*- J-LU-t-l ' I i-J l l\l

Murphy Towns

INDEX MAP

Scale : 1:250,000

oLEGEND

Instrument : Apex Parametrics MoxMin I-5

Coil Separation : 1 60 metres

Frequency : 444 Hertz

Profile Scale : 1cm = 20%

o04 CM

--20%

L-40%

In-phase Quadrature

CLAIM POSTS

H Located

D Unlocated

IDD m 200 m 300 m 4DO m 500 m

Scale : 1:5000

FALCONBRIDGE LIMITEDHLEM SURVEY (444 Hz)

WARK 1 2

WARK TOWNSHIPFile : w 12h[.xyz

NTS: 42-A/11

Date : December, 1997

Proj # 8034

WORK BY : Timmins Geophysics Ltd .

a'~~5L, !**1 i^*' ™

Bouchard

urphy Towns

INDEX MAP

Scale : 1:250,000

LEGEND

instrument : Apex Parametrics MaxMln -5 Coil Separation : 160 metres Frequency : 1 777 H ertz Profile Scale : 1cm ^ 20/S

r40?S

-205E

O

O CO

--2055

n-phase Quadrature

CLAIM POSTS

H Located

D Unlocated

100 m 200 m 300 m 400 m 500 m

Scale : 1:5000

FALCONBRIDGE LIMITEDHLEM SURVEY (Mil H z)

WARK 12

WARK TOWNSHIPFile : w 12hl.xyz

NTS: 42-A/11

Date : December, 1 997

Pro j # 8034

WORK BY : Timmins Geophysics Ltd .