RPT ON AIRBORNE GEOPHYS SURV CLAIM 1246624 LIZAR TP€¦ · Introduction At the request of Teck...

Airborne Geophysical Survey

Lizar Property (Claim 1246624)

Lizar Township

Sault Ste Marie Mining Division

Hornepayne Area, Ontario

25!02

Jari Paakki, MSc., PGeo

March 01, 2003 Thunder Bay, Ontario

RECEIVED

MAR O 5 :3C3

SEOSCIENCE ASSESSMENT

42C16NW2001 2.25102 LIZAR 010

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Introduction

Geophysical Survey

Cost Statement

Statement of Qualifications

1

4

5

6

List of Figures

Figure 1 General Location Map page 2

Figure 2 Claim Location Sketch page 3

Figure 3 Magnetometer Posted Readings and Contours(1:5000) In Pocket

Figure 4 Electromagnetic Posted Readings, Profiles and EMAnomaly Picks (1:5 000) In Pocket

Appendices

Appendix l Airborne System and Survey Specifications

Airborne Geophysical SurveyLizar Property (Claim 1246624)Sault Ste Marie Mining Division

Hornepayne Area, Ontario

Introduction

At the request of Teck Cominco Limited, Fugro Airborne Systems conducted an

airborne electromagnetic and magnetic survey over the Lizar property. The total

survey consisted of 1.503 line kilometres with 40.7 line kilometres covering claim

SSM 1246624 which is presented in this report.

Claim 1246624 is part of the Lizar property which is located some 100 kilometres

east of the Hemlo mines, approximately 40 kilometres south of the town of

Hornepayne (Fig. 1). Access to the property is via a network of logging roads

south of Hornepayne, east from Highway 631.

Freewest Resources Canada Inc. is the recorded holder of claim 1246624 which

Teck Cominco Limited has an option agreement. The claim consists of 15 units

located in the central part of Lizar Township near Kabinakagami Lake (Fig. 2).

The centre of the claim is at approximately UTM 685,300 mE and 5,419,200 mN

(NAD 83, Zone 16).

Figure 1: Location Map

Lizar Property

Figure 2: Claim Location Sketch

Geophysical Survey

From October 12 to October 23, 2002, an airborne electromagnetic and magnetic

survey was completed on the Lizar Property. The survey was conducted by

Fugro Airborne Surveys, 2060 Walkley Road, Ottawa, Ontario. The survey was

designed to cover the entire property including claim 1246624 located to the

northeast of the main block of claims. The Lizar property is underlain by mainly

upper greenschist facies mafic volcanics and lesser sedimentary rocks, felsic

lithologies and local gabbroic to ultramafic intrusions. Outcrop exposure is

relatively poor comprising less than 1 -207o in many parts of the property.

The aircraft used for this survey was a specially modified Casa-212 aircraft

equipped with a magnetometer and a new GEOTEM 1000 Receiver capable of

deeper ground penetration. The complete aircraft and survey specifications are

appended (Appendix l). Fight lines were oriented north-south spaced 100 metres

apart. Each flight line was 8 kilometres in length which is the minimum required

for this specific survey for proper coupling. West-east oriented flight tie lines

were positioned at approximately 2 kilometre spacings as control lines.

Results of the survey covering claim 1246624 are presented in Figures 3 and 4.

Figure 3 shows flight lines with posted magnetic readings (in nT, nanotesla)

along with contours of these values at a scale of 1:5 000. In Figure 4, also at a

scale of 1:5 000, electromagnetic data is presented as posted values, profiles

and anomaly picks.

Results of the survey over claim 1246624 indicate the presence of a larger

magnetic high anomaly in the south central portion of the claim (see Fig. 4) This

anomaly corresponds to an area where a gabbroic to ultramafic intrusion has

been mapped. No significant electromagnetic anomalies are outlined.

Cost Statement

Airborne Magnetics and ElectromagneticsSurvey S3,582

Plotting/Processing Data S 200

Aircraft Mobilization/Demobilization (pro rata) S1,246

Aircraft Stand-By Due To Poor Weather (pro rata) S 278

TOTAL__________________________35.306

Statement of Qualifications

l, Jari Paakki, do certify that:

l am a registered Geoscientist (No. 0230) with the Association of Geoscientists of Ontario.

l graduated from Laurentian University in 1990 with a Bachelor of Science Degree and in 1992 with a Master of Science Degree, both in Geology.

l have been employed as a geologist continuously for the last 10 years.

The data contained in this report and conclusions drawn from it are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.

o/,

DateJari PaakkiSenior Project Geologist Teck Cominco Limited Thunder Bay, Ontario

Appendix l

Airborne System and Survey Specifications

GRO

II

SURVEY OPERATIONS

Survey Coverage and Location

The survey area (Figure 2) was flown from Hornepayne, Ontario used as the base of operations.

Figure 2. Survey Location.

Line direction, spacing, as well as size of the flown survey are shown in Table 1. In all, 1,503 line kilometres of data were collected.

FAS-DPP-Rev.001 Page 6 of 84

GR O

Table 1

AREA

Lizar Project

LINE DIRECTION

N-S

LINE SPACING

100m

TIE-LINE DIRECTION

E-W

TIE-LINE SPACING

- 2000 m

SIZE

1 ,503 l km

Aircraft and Geophysical On-Board Equipment

Aircraft

Operator

Registration

Survey speed

Magnetometer

Electromagnetic system

Transmitter:

Receiver:

Base frequency:

Pulse width:

Pulse delay:

Off-time:

Point value:

Transmitter current:

Dipole moment:

Casa-212 (Twin Turbo Propeller)

FUGRO AIRBORNE SURVEYS

C-GDPP

125 knots 1 145 mph 1 65 m/s Figure 3. Magnetometer and GEOTEM Receiver.

Scintrex Cs-2 single cell cesium vapour, towed-bird installation, sensitivity = 0.01 nT1 , sampling rate = 0.1 s, ambient range 20,000 to 100,000 nT. The general noise envelope was kept below 0.5 nT. The nominal sensor height was -73 m above ground.

GEOTEM 7000 20 channel multicoil system

Vertical axis loop mounted on aircraft of 231 m2

Number of turns: 6

Nominal height above ground of 120 m

Multicoil system (X, Y and Z) with a final recording rate of 4 samples/second, for the recording of 20 channels of X, Y and Z-coil data. The nominal height above ground is -70 m, placed -130 m behind the centre of the transmitter loop,

90 Hz

2083 us

130 us

3385 us

43.4 MS

-500 A

-7x105Am2 Figure 4. Modified CASA-212 on survey.

1 One nanotesla (nT) is the S.l. equivalent of one gamma.


ICSRO

GEOTEM 90 Hz frequency electromagnetic data windows:

Table 2Channel

1234567891011121314151617181920

Start (p)410233750565860626568727680859198105113121

End (p)9223649555759616467717579849097104112120128

Width (p)61314136222334445677888

Start (ms)0.13

0.3910.9551.5632.1272.3872.4742.5612.6482.7782.908-3.0823.2553.4293.6463.9064.2104.5144.8615.208

End (ms)0.3910.9551.5632.1272.3872.4742.5612.6482.7782.9083.0823.2553.4293.6463.9064.2104.5144.8615.2085.556

Mid (ms)0.2600.6731.2591.8452.2572.4312.5172.6042.7132.8432.9953.1683.3423.5373.7764.0584.3624.6885.0355.382

Digital Acquisition:

Analogue Recorder:

Barometric Altimeter:

Radar Altimeter:

Camera:

Electronic Navigation:

FUGRO AIRBORNE SURVEYS GEODAS SYSTEM.

RMS GR-33, showing the total magnetic field at 2 vertical scales, the radar and barometric altimeters, the time-constant filtered traces of dB/dt X-coil off-time channels 9-20 data and the on-time channel 1, the raw traces of both dB/dt and B-field X, Y and Z-coil channel 20, the EM X and Y-coils primary fields, the power line monitor, the 4th difference of the magnetics, the X- coil earth's field monitor and the fiducials.

Rosemount 1241 M, sensitivity 1 ft, 1 s recording interval.

King, accuracy 207o, sensitivity 1 ft, range O to 2500 ft, 1 sec recording interval.

Panasonic colour video, super VMS, model WV-CL302.

NOVATEL Propak 4E-315R 12 channel GPS receiver, 1 sec receding interval, with a resolution of 0.00001 degree and an accuracy of 5 m.


GRO

Analogue recorder display setup:

Table 3NameXF09XF10XF11XF12XF13XF14XF15XF16XF17XF18XF19XF20BZ20BX20X20Z20X01XPLXEFM

DescirptiondB/dt X coil Time Filtered Channel 09dB/dt X coil Time Filtered Channel 10dB/dt X coil Time Filtered Channel 1 1dB/dt X coil Time Filtered Channel 12dB/dt X coil Time Filtered Channel 13dB/dt X coil Time Filtered Channel 14dB/dt X coil Time Filtered Channel 15dB/dt X coil Time Filtered Channel 16dB/dt X coil Time Filtered Channel 17dB/dt X coil Time Filtered Channel 18dB/dt X coil Time Filtered Channel 19dB/dt X coil Time Filtered Channel 20B-Field Z coil Raw channel 20B-Field X coil Raw channel 20dB/dt X coil Raw channel 20dB/dt X coil Raw channel 20dB/dt X coil Raw channel 01Powerline MonitorEarth Field Monitor

XPRM |X Primary FieldYPRM N Primary FieldY20 dB/dt Y coil Raw channel 20CMAG Coarse Total Field MagneticsFMAG Fine Total Field MagneticsRADR Radar AltimieterWDIF Magnetic 4th Difference FilteredPARC (Barometric Altimeter

Scale10000100001QOOO10000100001000010000100001000010000100001000080000800002000020000500000.210.413.320000300100501100

UnitpV/cmpV/cmpV/cmpV/cmpV/cmpV/cmpV/cmpV/cmpV/cmpV/cmpV/cmpV/cmfT/cmfT/cmpV/cmpV/cmpV/cmV/cmV/cmV/cmV/cmpV/cmnT/cmnT/cmft/cmnT/cmft/cm

Base Station Equipment

Magnetometer:

GPS Receiver:

Computer:

Converter:

Scintrex CS-2 single cell cesium vapour, mounted in a magnetically quiet area, measuring the total intensity of the earth's magnetic field in units of 0.01 nT at intervals of 1 s, within a noise envelope of 0.20 nT.

NOVATEL Propak 4E-315R 12 channel GPS receiver, 1 sec receding interval, with a resolution of 0.00001 degree and an accuracy of 5 m.

Laptop, Pentium II model, 220 Mhz.

Picodas, model MEP710 3/10901 GTS 780008.


GR O

Field Office Equipment

Computer:

Printer:

DAT Tape Drive:

Hard Drive:

Dell Inspiron 8000 Pentium III laptop with 30 GB hard drive.

Hewlett Packard DeskJet 690C.

DDS-90 4 mm.

8 GB Removable hard drive.

Survey Specifications

Traverse Line Direction:

Traverse Line Spacing:

Tie Line Direction:

Tie Line Spacing:

See Table 1.

See Table 1.

See Table 1.

See Table 1.

Navigation:

Altitude:

Magnetic Noise Levels:

EM Noise Levels:

Diurnal Variations:

Differential G PS. Traverse and tie line deviation was not to exceed the theoretical flight path by 50 m over a distance ^ km.

The survey was flown at a mean terrain clearance of 120 m. Altitude was not to exceed 20 m from the nominal over 3 km.

The noise envelope on the magnetic data was not to exceed 0.25 nT over 3 km.

The noise envelope on the raw electromagnetic dB/dt X- and Z- coil channel 20 was not to exceed 3500 pT/s over a distance greater than 3 km as displayed on the raw analogue traces.

Deviations were not to exceed 10 nT over a chord of 30 sec.

Survey Calibrations

EM System Calibration: The EM system was calibrated at high altitude before and after every production flight. The effectiveness of the compensation was evaluated by checking the system response to the series of the survey aircraft "pitches". If necessary, calibration was repeated until satisfactory results were obtained.


BRO

Field Crew

Project Manager:

Geophysicist:

Data Processor:

Pilots:

Electronics Operator:

Engineer:

E. Aparicio

T. Carmichael

M. Carriere

M. Williston, K. Wilson, L. Maike

E. Aparicio

S. Erickson

Production Statistics

Flying dates:

Total production:

Number of production flights:

Hours of production flying:

Number of km/hour of production flying:

Number of km/average production flight:

Number of hours/average production flight: 3.3 hour/flight

Days lost due to weather: 1

October 14th - October 21 st, 2002

1.503 line kilometres

7

22.8 hrs

65.9 km/hour

214.7 km/flight


IGRO

III

QUALITY CONTROL AND COMPILATION PROCEDURES

In the field after each flight, all analogue records were examined as a preliminary assessment of the noise level of the recorded data. Altimeter deviations from the prescribed flying altitudes were also closely examined as well as the diurnal activity, as recorded on the base station.

All digital data were verified for validity and continuity. The data from the aircraft and base station was transferred to the PC's hard disk. Basic statistics were generated for each parameter recorded, these included: the minimum, maximum, and mean values; the standard deviation; and any null values located. All recorded parameters were edited for spikes or datum shifts, followed by final data verification via an interactive graphics screen with on-screen editing and interpolation routines.

The quality of the OPS navigation was controlled on a daily basis by recovering the flight path of the aircraft. The C3NAVG2 (Combined Code and Carrier for NAVigation with GPS and GLONASS) correction programme employs the raw ranges from the base station to create improved models of clock error, atmospheric error, satellite orbit, and selective availability. These models are used to improve the conversion of aircraft raw ranges to aircraft position.

Checking all data for adherence to specifications was carried out in the field by the FUGRO AIRBORNE SURVEYS field geophysicist.


GR O

IVDATA PROCESSING

Flight Path Recovery

GPS Recovery:

Projection:

Datum:

Ellipsoid:

Central meridian:

False Easting:

False Northing:

Scale factor:

Altitude Data

Noise editing:

Noise filtering:

GPS positions recalculated from the recorded raw range data, and differentially corrected.

Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM Zone 16N).

NAD 83.

GRS1980.

870 West.

500000 metres.

O metres.

0.99960.

Alfatrim median filter used to eliminate the two highest and two lowest values from the statistical distribution of a 9 point sample window for the radar altimeter. For the barometric altimeter the alfatrim median filter eliminated only the single highest and lowest points from the statistical distribution of a 5 point window.

Triangular filter set to remove radar, baro and GPS wavelengths less than 4 seconds.

Base Station Diurnal Magnetics

Noise editing:

Culture editing:

Noise filtering:

Alfatrim median filter used to eliminate the two highest and two lowest values from the statistical distribution of a 9 point sample window.

Polynomial interpolation via a graphic screen editor.

Running average filter set to remove wavelengths less than 2 seconds.

Extraction of long wavelength component:Low pass filter set to retain only wavelengths greater than 75 seconds.

Airborne Magnetics

Lag correction: 3.7 seconds.


GRO

Noise editing: 4th difference editing routine set to remove spikes greater than 0.5 nT,followed by an alfatrim median filter eliminating the high and the low value from its calculation over a 5 point window.

Noise filtering: Triangular filter set to remove noise events having a wavelength less than 0.5seconds and an amplitude less than 0.5 nT.

Diurnal substraction: The long wavelength component of the diurnal (greater than 75 seconds) wasremoved from the data, prior to the levelling analysis.

IGRF removal date: 2002.8.

Gridding: The data was gridded using an Akima routine with a grid cell size of 20 m.

Residual Magnetic Intensity:

The residual magnetic intensity (RMI) is derived from the total magnetic intensity (TMI), the diurnal, and the regional magnetic field. The total magnetic intensity is measured in the "aircraft, the diurnal is measured from the ground station, and the regional magnetic field is calculated from the International Geomagnetic Reference Field (IGRF). The low frequency component of the diurnal is extracted from the filtered ground station data and removed from the TMI. The average of the diurnal is then added back in to obtain the resultant total magnetic intensity. The regional magnetic field, calculated for the specific survey location and the time of the survey, is then removed from the resultant total magnetic intensity. After levelling the residual magnetic intensity is completed.

Levelling:The first stage of levelling of the magnetic data (correcting for residual diurnal effects, altitude differences and positioning errors) was done on the line data by automatically comparing the values of the total field at the intersection of each line and tie line. The differences were analyzed and a compensation was calculated at each intersection in order to provide a pattern of smoothly varying adjustments along each line and tie-line. Erratic differences, implying an error in the intersection location, were carefully checked and corrected.

The second step consisted of applying a micro-levelling routine to the gridded data in order to remove errors that are due to diurnal variations. During the micro-levelling routine a compensation grid was created and profile data was then extracted along the survey lines and stored in the final dataset as the levelling compensation.

The final Residual Magnetic Intensity was calculated in the following manner:

Filtered airborne Total Magnetic Intensity- Low frequency component of the Diurnal data + Average diurnal data value-IGRF+ Levelling compensation= Final Residual Magnetic Intensity


Electromagnetics

dB/dt Data

Lag correction: 4.2 seconds.

Data correction: The x, y and z-coil data were processed from the 20 raw channels recordedat 4 samples per second.

The following processing steps were applied to the dB/dt data from all coil sets:

a) The data from channels 1 to 5 (on-time) and 6 to 20 (off-time) were corrected for drift in flight form (prior to cutting the recorded data back to the correct line limits) by passing a low order polynomial function through the baseline minima along each channel, via a graphic screen display;

b) The data were edited for residual spheric spikes by examining the decay pattern of each individual EM transient. Bad decays (i.e. not fitting a normal exponential function) were deleted and replaced by interpolation;

c) Corrections were made in the x- and z-coil data for low frequency, incoherent noise elements (that do not correlate from channel to channel) in the data, by analysing the decay patterns of channels 10 to 20 (OMEGA process).

d) Noise filtering was done using an adaptive filter technique based on time domain triangular operators. Using a 2nd difference value to identify changes in gradient along each channel, minimal filtering (5 point convolution) is applied over the peaks of the anomalies, ranging in set increments up to a maximum amount of filtering in the resistive background areas (27 points for both the x-coil and the z-coil data).

e) This was followed by the application of a small running average filter.

f) The filtered data from the x, y and z-coils were then re-sampled to a rate of 5 samples/s and combined into a common file for archiving.

NOTE : A fault developed with the transmitter controller board which affected the data from flights 6 to 11. This problem resulted in a slight shift in the group delay at the start of the waveform and the introduction of some spikes. This was remedied in processing by adjusting the gate positions, along the waveform, to compensate for the shift in the group delay and re-windowing the data from the halfwave files. Small irregularities in the on-time channels of the B-Field data may result.

B-field Data

Processing steps: The processing of the B-Field data stream is essentially the same as thatdescribed above for the regular dB/dt stream. The lag adjustment used was the same, followed by: 1) drift adjustments; 2) spike editing for spheric events; 3) correction for low frequency, incoherent and non-decaying noise events; and 4) final noise filtering with an adaptive filter. The processing step 3 was applied in the B-field processing but not in the dB/dt processing. By nature, the B-Field data will contain a higher degree of coherency of the noise that


GR O

automatically gets eliminated (or considerably attenuated) in the regular dB/dt, since this is the time derivative of the signal.

B-field Data Advantage:

The introduction of the B-Field data stream, as part of the GEOTEM system, provides the explorationist with a more effective tool for exploration in a broader range of geological environments and for a larger class of target priorities.

The advantage of the B-Field data compared with the normal voltage data (dB/dt) are as follows:

1. A broader range of target conductance that the system is sensitive to (the B- field is sensitive to bodies with conductance as great as 100,000 Siemens);

Enhancement of the slowly decaying response of good conductors;

Suppression of rapidly decaying response of less conductive overburden;

Reduction in the effect of spherics on the data;

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

An enhanced ability to interpret anomalies due to conductors below thick conductive overburden;

Reduced dynamic range of the measured response (easier data processing and display).

Figures 5 and 6 display the calculated vertical plate response for the GEOTEM signal for the dB/dt and B-field respectively. For the dB/dt response, you will note that the amplitude of the early channel peaks at about 25 Siemens, and the late channels at about 250 Siemens. As the conductance exceeds 1000 Siemens the response curves quickly roll back into the noise level. For the B-Field response, the early channel amplitude peaks at about 80 Siemens and the late channel at about 550 Siemens. The projected extension of the graph in the direction of increasing conductance, where the response would roll back into the noise level, would be close to 100,000 Siemens. Thus, a strong conductor, having a conductance of several thousand Siemens, would be difficult to interpret on the dB/dt data, since the response would be mixed in with the background noise. However, this strong conductor would stand out clearly on the B-Field data, although it would have an unusual character, being a moderate to high amplitude response, exhibiting almost no decay.

600 x 300 m vertical plate nomogram

30 Hz, 4 millisecond configurationdelay time

600 x 300 m vertical plate nomogram

30 Hz, 4 millisecond configuration

10 100conductance (S)

1000 10 100conductance (S)

Figure 5. dB/dt vertical plate nomogram. Figure 6. B-field vertical plate nomogram.


GRO

In theory, the response from a super conductor (50,000 to 100,000 Siemens) would be seen on the B-Field data as a low amplitude, non-decaying anomaly, not visible in the off-time channels of the dB/dt stream. Caution must be exercised here, as this signature can also reflect a residual noise event in the B-Field data. In this situation, careful examination of the dB/dt on-time (in-pulse) data is required to resolve the ambiguity. If the feature were strictly a noise event, it would be not be present in the dB/dt off-time data stream. This would locate the response at the resistive limit, and the mid in-pulse channel (normally identified as channel 3) would reflect little but background noise, or at best a weak negative peak. If, on the other hand, the feature does indeed reflect a superconductor, then this would locate the response at the inductive limit. In this situation, channel 3 of the dB/dt stream will be a mirror image of the transmitted pulse, i.e. a large negative.

EM Decay Constant:The decay constant values are obtained by fitting the channel data to a single exponential function of the form:

Y*Ae-tfT ,where A = amplitude at time zero, t = time in microseconds and T is the decay constant. A semi-log plot of this exponential function will be displayed as a straight line, the slope of which will reflect the rate of decay and therefore the strength of the conductor. A slow rate of decay, reflecting a high conductance, will be represented by a high decay constant value. As a single parameter, the decay constant provides more useful information than the amplitude data alone of any given single channel, as it indicates not only the peak position of the response but also the relative strength of the conductor.For the present dataset, the decay constant was calculated by fitting the dB/dt X-coil data from channels 8 to 20 to the exponential function.

Anomaly Selection:EM anomalies were selected by fitting the data from the dB/dt X-coil channels 9 to 20 to a vertical plate model, in order to extract conductance and depth information. Comparisons of the response from the X and Z coil data were made during the anomaly review for the final selection of the anomalies.Refer to Appendix F for a full listing of the anomaly selections which provides the particulars of each selected anomaly, including the conductivity-thickness-product (GTP) and the depth of the conductor below surface. It is important to note that the derived values of CTP and depth associated with the anomaly selections are only valid if the geometry of the conductive source can be well approximated by a vertical plate of 300 by 600 m. A note is also included to guide the correct evaluation of the anomaly information.

Apparent Conductance Calculation:The apparent conductance values were computed from the full waveform (all 20 channels) of the combined dB/dt X and Z-coils data by fitting to a thin sheet model. The results are stored in milliSiemens (mS).

Total Energy Envelope:To combine the benefits of the measurements from both the X and Z coil data and reduce the asymmetry in the shape of the anomalies, the data from channel 9 of both the X and Z coils were used to compute the Total Energy Envelope. This was done through an Hilbert transform and essentially reflects the square root of the sum of the squares of each component. This parameter provides a good picture of the overall near-surface conductivity.

Gridding:The EM data were gridded with a 20 m grid cell size, using a linear interpolation.


ONTARIO MINISTRY OF NORTHERN DEVELOPMENT AND MINES

Transaction No: W0350.00344

Recording Date: 2003-MAR-05

Approval Date: 2003-MAR-05

Work Report Summary

Status: APPROVED

Work Done from : 2002-OCT-12

to: 2002-OCT-23

Client(s):

300786

Survey Type(s):

RESSOURCES FREEWEST CANADA INC., FREEWEST RESOURCES CANADA INC.

AEM AMAG

Work Report Details;

Claim*

SSM 1246624

Perform

55,306

S5.306

Perform Approve

55,306

S5.306

Applied

S5,306

S5.306

Applied Approve

S5.306

S5.306

Assign

SO

SO

Assign Approve

0

SO

Reserve

SO

SO

Reserve Approve

SO

SO

Due Date

2003-MAR-19

External Credits:

Reserve:

SO

SO Reserve of Work Report*: W0350.00344

SO Total Remaining

Status of claim is based on information currently on record.

42C16NW2001 2.25102 LIZAR 900

2003-Mar-13 09:12 Armstrong-d Page 1 of 1

iviinistry ofNorthern Developmentand Mines

Date: 2003-MAR-06

Ministere du Developpement du Nord et des Mines Ontario

GEOSCIENCE ASSESSMENT OFFICE 933 RAMSEY LAKE ROAD, 6th FLOOR SUDBURY, ONTARIO P3E 6B5

RESSOURCES FREEWEST CANADA INC. FREEWEST RESOURCES CANADA INC. 800 BOUL. RENE LEVESQUE QUEST BUREAU 1525 MONTREAL, QUEBEC H3B1X9 CANADA

Dear Sir or Madam

Tel: (888) 415-9845 Fax:(877)670-1555

Submission Number: 2.25102 Transaction Number(s): W0350.00344

Subject: Approval of Assessment Work

We have approved your Assessment Work Submission with the above noted Transaction Number(s). The attached Work Report Summary indicates the results of the approval.

At the discretion of the Ministry, the assessment work performed on the mining lands noted in this work report may be subject to inspection and/or investigation at any time.

If you have any question regarding this correspondence, please contact BRUCE GATES by email at [email protected] or by phone at (705) 670-5856.

Yours Sincerely,

Ron Gashinski

Senior Manager, Mining Lands Section

Cc: Resident Geologist

Ressources Freewest Canada Inc., Freewest Resources Canada Inc. (Claim Holder)

Assessment File Library

Ressources Freewest Canada Inc., Freewest Resources Canada Inc. (Assessment Office)

Visit our website at http://www.gov.on.ca/MNDM/LANDS/mlsmnpge.htm Page: 1 Correspondence 10:18040

ONTARIO^:" Minln9 Land Tenure

MaP

MO1

H

S

ro o o

Date l Time of ISBUB: Trui Mar06 10;53;47 EST 2003

TOWNSHIP l AREA PLAN LIZAR G-2328

ADMINISTRATIVE DISTRICTS l DIVISIONS

Mining Division Sault Ste. MarieLand Tlttoa/Ragtetry Division ALGOMAMinistry of Natural Resources District WAWA

TOPOGRAPHIC Land Tenure

g]

tH ^M-'m *"-~m -—-|!^j *,Vinj Hym

ei —m "•"~B ;'"" r™

LAND TENURE WITHDRAWALS

IMPORTANT NQTfCES

LAND TENURE WITHDRAWAL DESCRIPTIONS

ftilrH Jvtll ( r lft* (nilTCCT ."jrALHJ.HBHJ.HD

A6/A

General Information and Limitations

684000 685000 686000 687000

10,0013.61 17.21 20.87I4.43

28.00 31.34 34.18 36.30 37.487.41

.053.17

29.03 24.26 18.88

17.6215.8013.5310.9107.9714.6501.0797.36

.67

3.191.600.058.53

.06 55.67

354.34 353.12 351 93

0.88 349.93 349.06 348.26 34744 346*5--. 345.82 ^\ 344.94 X-

79,5376.31 73,16 70,19 6729 64.51 61.90 59.45 57.20 55.16 5S34

407.54 401.95

.6839^46

.386.

.381.98 77.66 73.72 JOB*

.3935.5535.615.62

32.89132.1531.3930.64.29,8929.1828.4527.82

344.50343,34342,03 J40.95 340.01

339.2238.6636,30

324,73 324:30:323.89 23,543:22

22.882:46

342.32 341.20 340.29 339.54 336.89 338.27 337.64 336.96 336.20 336.34 334.38 333:27 331.99 330.61 329.11 327.60 326,07324,67323.39 322 321 j 321.1 320.86 320.74 320.70 320.59 320.40 319.98 319.37 318.56 317.51 316.30 314.87 313.33 311.76 310.09 308.3 306.7 304 330/47

.83

.37 296.94 295.71 294.71 294.00 293,77 293.97 294.70 296.08 298.09 300.96 304,7

37.9637.83137.66. I37.45 I37.06 36,49 i35.77

334,93 333.65 332.92

1331:86 330.77 329,65 328.43 32757 325.98 324.59 323.06 32139 313.54 317.54 31534 312.82 310.38 307.74305:05302.33 J99.67 297.03 294.4529V.9&

326,85 326.53 326.31 326.15: 325,99 325,78 325,47 24.96

.23 23.24 22.01

.56 318.92 317,08 3.15.06 312.92 3.10.66 308.27 305.74

.331.70

. 331.53. .331.39 331,20 330.94 330,54 329.93 329.12 326.T2 326.89 326.48 323.83 322.05 320,16318.1:5

J15.99 313.69 311.18 308,50305.61

.44

140.26 (38.81 137.39 .

335.90 1334-34. (32.67 30.79 28.66 26,14 23.49

J320J1 17.96 15.24 T2.70 10.44 08,46 06,

.78

.2134.59

3.943.20

332.39331.43 : 330:38 329,20 327.90 326.54 325.17

.86 69

1.66 .82

.020.16 319.66 319.30 318,99 318.64 318.22 317.66 1317.08 316.37 315.51 314.54 313.40 3.12.17 310.61 309,60 308.36 307,35 306.62 30643

.97 2

a. .322/93 1.322,63

.322,57. 322.12. 321.45 320.52

.319,26 ".17.72 15.94 13,93 11.83

.76 18 7.14

.86 .37 .62

2;,60 8.26 3.63

.44 #62,97

.90J293.73 290.09 285.86281-07 275.61.269:43262.59

295,2291.26287.06282.54277.80 272.80 267.61 262:21

6.64

03.4182.5401,6700.7199,5898.3196,8435.2463.55

291.8090.10-88.4987.1085.92

E85.08Z84.54284.36284.54 85.08 88.07 87,63 89.45 91.96

1294.8

250.68243,84236.58229.06221.35213.5

247.17238.75230,03221,25

240. J235. 231.09 227.86 225.5^ 212447 224.50 227.94

1236.42

.23,_.27 252,84251,15 .50.13 149.59 S041 152,70

.88

198.184191.17185.8482.34

182.10186

305.96.308.52311.35314.28317.10319.64321.81323.51

, 324.83325.78326.60327.31327.94328.63

.329.38| J30 28

; 331.38 ! 332.58

01 .67

337: 340.17

78.- 280/66 288.76 267.97 "94.1162.01

313.57 328,67 347.33

B9-/3

385X379.9374.9370,0365,6361.8368,6356.3364.6353.7353.4353.9354.9356.6358.836.1.6365.0369.2373.6378.3383388393.

;52 0.45

364:42 358.57

8 353:03 7,95

4.4619.06

34.207-1.15

(349.76 357.10 365.49

312.35 317.79 323,55 J29.37 335.15 340.80 346.21 35J.37

339.65S, 336:66

334.69333.77333.87

B35.15337.38

28.2135.73

H43.67361.86

.2219.6918.8718.6919.2

1320

28.62332.67

36.93W1.11 W4.87 48.06 50.46 31.95 52.75 52.69 52.33

356 360.80 365.10 J69.18 373,09 376.85 380,47 384.07 387.61 391.19 394.67 398.08 401.48

92

.767.65

330.94334.52338.26342.03345.

1.84 |355.91 359.94 363^5 367.53 370.97 374:20 377:17 379:81 381,95 J83.44 )84.04 38342 381.34 378.10

94.0358.05

1735.057.80

.8071.2972,2773.0473.39

3.483.31

72.88

332,98 335.63 337.71 339.24 340.25 340:71

.05.61

356.54357,78358.35358.14357.19

.4001

50.471491,36148.29

737 M1 38S.89 38 i.51 38391.02

.53 .62

m3.4X13.032,7242.11.71.340.88?.0.42,9.97!9.59'9.35!9.269.309.52

39.93 340.49 S41.21 . (42.11 ;i S43.21

346.54 342.84 339.05 335.30 331.69 328:32

.31

25:1327.8530,2532.31

1434,17436.78*37.40439.02440.63442,27443.79445.05.M6.08

J33|,93 331.94 3332 331. 330.41 329.78 329.36 329,18 329:20 329:45 329.90 330,51 331.31

.11

494.56 504.80

J518.23320.318.317.317.316,317.1317.318.319:

3Z1J2

467.2467.69468.31469.24.470.52 :*72.20474.10476.34.478.73461.2483.8986.7289.6792.62

578;40 569:34 560.50

3.9-1 561 :,96 552.3B589.8

589.15 587.70- 585. 58.2.

535.43 527.97 52131 516.43 510:28 S05.73

.32J367.61. J69JOB

" 370.67372.36374.06375.72377.29378.63

529.72526.59 ^'^ 524.14.*' J' 522.20:5 520.30^

W9.6351.86

(54.33 57.04 59.93K 62.98,"^. 65.76\ "^ 68.30 \

B70.40 172.00 373.09 373.8S 374.35 374.83 375.33 376.17 377.32 378.80 380.50 38245 384.45 386.48 388.44 390. 392. 393.88

5.737.66

399.59 401. 403.60

.03

.802

J552.81 548.01 642.98 537,77 532,

495.06492.21 489.65 487.32 486.02 482.95 480.79 478,70 476,57 474.38 472,18 469.88 467.48 464-96 462.36 S59.61 459.78 4.53.77 450,63

41

458.460.462.464.466.51 J". 380.51

381.00 381,24 381.35 381.45 381.73 382.21 382.99 384.13 385.70

7.65 .99

2.80 5.82 3.14

02.73 .92

474.85470.46 466:28 462,59 i.59.34 S56.52 454.41 462.83

471.80473.40474.89476.19476.99477.41

.13- 78.05 72.86 797

.33

2.37 1,59

. 340.82 340.07 339.34 338;60 337.90 337:.43 336.97

.66136.53

.61. 6,89 17.41.

338.14 .339-05 .340-1? ; 341.24 , 342-28

.E (KM452.7453.2463.5453.0 &51.8

443,95 439,46 434,78 429,66 423.99 *17,64 410.44

.49

37072 36125 3S3.07340 ~

335.86 331.99 32fl-

383.92372.35361.97

.43

365.4735568

7.27431: 428425.423,420.3f417,i il413,1408.401.6

Q.05

436.12 430^1425.4.7

5.13*211:37

19.6917.96

J333.83 8.53 4:020.31

17.2214,7512,7611.28

336.7.1 330.32 324.73 320.04

J316.09 312.94

2

100Scale 1:5000

O 100 200 300

metresHAD8irTnmiversBMeKator(-37.0.0.W96.5OOOOO.O)Zane 16

684000 685000 686000 687000

42C16NW2001 2.25102 LIZAR 210

Teck Cominco LimitedLizar Project

Lizar Township, OntarioAirborne Electromagnetic Survey

Pole Reduced Magnetic MapContours with Mag Values

Tracy Campbell, January 10, 2003

684000 685000 686000 687000

'.p-mîiVlji, ̂ ^.â.jasa-TJ

î"*-*fr .;r i! "jHs .'i;r : "^'•^^^•i^tr-M-'^

S?j5sy V arfJ?';:. ;V;afer! si&iMfi

P^^^S^M^! ^|^g|fi|^^

Ai^S^^Sfe''*^*^Jj^S^,;**;;^

j^SSiSisSS

EM Anomaly Peak Response Symbols

ANOMALY CLASSIFICATION

-^- 1-2 Channels and/or Surficial

•A- 3-4 Channels

Anomaly letter. Apparent Conductance "

5-6Channels

7-BChannels

9-10 Channels

11 -12 Channels

Profile Scale: 500 units/mHlimatrB

^-Interpreted as -^ C

a possible surficial /contribution

1800.- v , ~ "'-. X-cai\ Channel 11

Amplitude (ppm)

Interpreted as possible culturai contribution

Culture Response

Anomaly letter ^^^

^* Type of source not clear ^

100Scale 1:5000

O 100 200 300

metres NADB3 S'Transverse Menstor(-87,0,0 9996.5OOOOO.O) Zone 16

684000 685000 686000 687000

42C16NW2001 2,25102 LIZAR 220

r-*Teck Cominco Limited

Lizar Project Lizar Township, Ontario

Airborne Electromagnetic SurveyAnomaly Picks with

X Coil Channel 11 Profile

Tracy Campbell, January 10, 2003

RPT ON AIRBORNE GEOPHYS SURV CLAIM 1246624 LIZAR TP€¦ · Introduction At the request of Teck...

Documents

Transcript of RPT ON AIRBORNE GEOPHYS SURV CLAIM 1246624 LIZAR TP€¦ · Introduction At the request of Teck...