RPF 9 MAY 2007 TECHNOLOGY IN PRACTICE FEEDBACK ON CUTBACK SPECIFICATIONS Presentation by Johan...

31
RPF 9 MAY 2007 TECHNOLOGY IN PRACTICE FEEDBACK ON CUTBACK SPECIFICATIONS Presentation by Johan Muller, Acknowledgement: Trevor Distin, Mike Zacharias, Daniel Mashatola Hannes Lambert, Pieter Goosen, Desmond O’Brien, Kobus Louw, Dennis Rossmann, Jacques van Heerden Denzil Sadler,

Transcript of RPF 9 MAY 2007 TECHNOLOGY IN PRACTICE FEEDBACK ON CUTBACK SPECIFICATIONS Presentation by Johan...

Page 1: RPF 9 MAY 2007 TECHNOLOGY IN PRACTICE FEEDBACK ON CUTBACK SPECIFICATIONS Presentation by Johan Muller, Acknowledgement: Trevor Distin, Mike Zacharias,

RPF 9 MAY 2007TECHNOLOGY IN PRACTICE

FEEDBACK ON CUTBACKSPECIFICATIONS

Presentation by Johan Muller,

Acknowledgement: Trevor Distin, Mike Zacharias, Daniel MashatolaHannes Lambert, Pieter Goosen, Desmond O’Brien, Kobus Louw, Dennis Rossmann, Jacques van HeerdenDenzil Sadler,

Page 2: RPF 9 MAY 2007 TECHNOLOGY IN PRACTICE FEEDBACK ON CUTBACK SPECIFICATIONS Presentation by Johan Muller, Acknowledgement: Trevor Distin, Mike Zacharias,

PRIME PROBLEM?

Page 3: RPF 9 MAY 2007 TECHNOLOGY IN PRACTICE FEEDBACK ON CUTBACK SPECIFICATIONS Presentation by Johan Muller, Acknowledgement: Trevor Distin, Mike Zacharias,

POSSIBLE AMENDMENTS

• PROBLEM STATEMENT:

• OVERCOME PROBLEMS WITH MC30– LACK OF PENETRATION– SLOW CURING (UP TO 7 DAYS)

• PARTICULARLY INLAND

• PARTICULARLY WINTERTIME

• PARTICULARLY DENSE G1

• PARTICULARLY CEMENT STABILISED

Page 4: RPF 9 MAY 2007 TECHNOLOGY IN PRACTICE FEEDBACK ON CUTBACK SPECIFICATIONS Presentation by Johan Muller, Acknowledgement: Trevor Distin, Mike Zacharias,

HISTORY & BACKGROUND

SABS 308:1971

• Never amended since 1971

• Requirements and product range limited

• RC 250 no longer available ex refineries

• Invert Bitumen Emulsion (no SANS spec?)

• Tar primes discontinued in 2006

• Emulsion primes recent addition

Page 5: RPF 9 MAY 2007 TECHNOLOGY IN PRACTICE FEEDBACK ON CUTBACK SPECIFICATIONS Presentation by Johan Muller, Acknowledgement: Trevor Distin, Mike Zacharias,

WHAT IS HAPPENING?

USE OF TAR PRIMES DISCONTINUED• Sabita seminars held in September 2006

– Use of Tar to be discontinued– Sabita Manual 26 launched November 2006

• Sasol CarboTar closed shop 30 June 2006• Mittal limited tar products still availableCUTBACKS• MC grades available from Refineries• IBE manufactured by Secondary Suppliers• Emulsion primes promoted based on quick

drying ability

Page 6: RPF 9 MAY 2007 TECHNOLOGY IN PRACTICE FEEDBACK ON CUTBACK SPECIFICATIONS Presentation by Johan Muller, Acknowledgement: Trevor Distin, Mike Zacharias,

CUTBACK BITUMEN PRIMES

• MC 30 – Works OK in summer– Poor penetration in winter – Poor penetration on dense / stabilised bases

• MC 30 + 10% IP penetrates better• Invert bitumen emulsion penetrates better

– Expensive cutter – kerosene = Jet Fuel

• MC70 – Hardly ever used.

Page 7: RPF 9 MAY 2007 TECHNOLOGY IN PRACTICE FEEDBACK ON CUTBACK SPECIFICATIONS Presentation by Johan Muller, Acknowledgement: Trevor Distin, Mike Zacharias,

CUTBACK BITUMENS

• MC3000– Necessary for use in sand seals– Used in Otta Seals in wintertime

• MC 800 – Limited use in specialised cold mix

applications

Page 8: RPF 9 MAY 2007 TECHNOLOGY IN PRACTICE FEEDBACK ON CUTBACK SPECIFICATIONS Presentation by Johan Muller, Acknowledgement: Trevor Distin, Mike Zacharias,

COMPARISON OF AVAILABLE PRIME PRODUCTS

• MC30 – 55% residual bitumen– 45% kerosene

• IBE Invert bitumen emulsion– 85% MC30 / IP (41,25% residual bitumen)– 15% water - emulsifier assists penetration

• Emulsion prime = MC30 + IP + water– 40% water– 60% MC30 + IP = <30% residual bitumen

Page 9: RPF 9 MAY 2007 TECHNOLOGY IN PRACTICE FEEDBACK ON CUTBACK SPECIFICATIONS Presentation by Johan Muller, Acknowledgement: Trevor Distin, Mike Zacharias,

WHAT DID WE DO?

• R&D indicates a new type of prime required– Performance verified on laboratory scale– Field trials were performed– Specification is now required

Page 10: RPF 9 MAY 2007 TECHNOLOGY IN PRACTICE FEEDBACK ON CUTBACK SPECIFICATIONS Presentation by Johan Muller, Acknowledgement: Trevor Distin, Mike Zacharias,

Invert Bitumen Emulsions

VS

LOW VISCOSITY CUTBACK PRIME

Page 11: RPF 9 MAY 2007 TECHNOLOGY IN PRACTICE FEEDBACK ON CUTBACK SPECIFICATIONS Presentation by Johan Muller, Acknowledgement: Trevor Distin, Mike Zacharias,

DENSE BASES PREPARED

Page 12: RPF 9 MAY 2007 TECHNOLOGY IN PRACTICE FEEDBACK ON CUTBACK SPECIFICATIONS Presentation by Johan Muller, Acknowledgement: Trevor Distin, Mike Zacharias,

PRIMES APPLIED

Page 13: RPF 9 MAY 2007 TECHNOLOGY IN PRACTICE FEEDBACK ON CUTBACK SPECIFICATIONS Presentation by Johan Muller, Acknowledgement: Trevor Distin, Mike Zacharias,

MC 30 IBE

Page 14: RPF 9 MAY 2007 TECHNOLOGY IN PRACTICE FEEDBACK ON CUTBACK SPECIFICATIONS Presentation by Johan Muller, Acknowledgement: Trevor Distin, Mike Zacharias,

Emulsion Primes

Page 15: RPF 9 MAY 2007 TECHNOLOGY IN PRACTICE FEEDBACK ON CUTBACK SPECIFICATIONS Presentation by Johan Muller, Acknowledgement: Trevor Distin, Mike Zacharias,

Research & Development

Page 16: RPF 9 MAY 2007 TECHNOLOGY IN PRACTICE FEEDBACK ON CUTBACK SPECIFICATIONS Presentation by Johan Muller, Acknowledgement: Trevor Distin, Mike Zacharias,

MC 30 PERFORMANCE VARIABLE

Poor penetration / takes long to dry

Why?• Non polar components – no surface charge

to assist with capillary actions• Bases too wet – PI too high• Base too dense• Viscosity of prime too viscous• How to overcome?

– MC30 (possibly by reducing viscosity)

Page 17: RPF 9 MAY 2007 TECHNOLOGY IN PRACTICE FEEDBACK ON CUTBACK SPECIFICATIONS Presentation by Johan Muller, Acknowledgement: Trevor Distin, Mike Zacharias,

Research & Development

Page 18: RPF 9 MAY 2007 TECHNOLOGY IN PRACTICE FEEDBACK ON CUTBACK SPECIFICATIONS Presentation by Johan Muller, Acknowledgement: Trevor Distin, Mike Zacharias,

Research & Development

Page 19: RPF 9 MAY 2007 TECHNOLOGY IN PRACTICE FEEDBACK ON CUTBACK SPECIFICATIONS Presentation by Johan Muller, Acknowledgement: Trevor Distin, Mike Zacharias,

Research & Development

Page 20: RPF 9 MAY 2007 TECHNOLOGY IN PRACTICE FEEDBACK ON CUTBACK SPECIFICATIONS Presentation by Johan Muller, Acknowledgement: Trevor Distin, Mike Zacharias,

Emulsion Primes

Emulsion prime 2Emulsion prime 1

Page 21: RPF 9 MAY 2007 TECHNOLOGY IN PRACTICE FEEDBACK ON CUTBACK SPECIFICATIONS Presentation by Johan Muller, Acknowledgement: Trevor Distin, Mike Zacharias,

What influences penetration performance?

• Viscosity is temperature related– Lower temperature = higher viscosity

• Viscosity affect– High viscosity = poor penetration

• Temperature affect– Low temperature = poor penetration

• Surface– Dense surface = poorer penetration

• Moisture content– Water fill voids and prime lies on top

Page 22: RPF 9 MAY 2007 TECHNOLOGY IN PRACTICE FEEDBACK ON CUTBACK SPECIFICATIONS Presentation by Johan Muller, Acknowledgement: Trevor Distin, Mike Zacharias,

What influences drying performance?

• Amount of penetration• Type of cutter (fluxing fluid)• Temperature

– Higher temperature = higher rate of evaporation of cutter

• Moisture– Excessive water fills air voids– Water polar and cutter non polar organic components does

not mix

Page 23: RPF 9 MAY 2007 TECHNOLOGY IN PRACTICE FEEDBACK ON CUTBACK SPECIFICATIONS Presentation by Johan Muller, Acknowledgement: Trevor Distin, Mike Zacharias,

The Viscosity - Temperature Relationship for MC 30 Cutback Bitumen

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 40.0 45.0 50.0 55.0 60.0

Temperature (°C)

Visc

osity

(mPa

.s)

Temperature-Viscosity relationship for MC30

MC 30

MC 10

Page 24: RPF 9 MAY 2007 TECHNOLOGY IN PRACTICE FEEDBACK ON CUTBACK SPECIFICATIONS Presentation by Johan Muller, Acknowledgement: Trevor Distin, Mike Zacharias,

Research & DevelopmentROAD TEMPERATURES/ TIME RELATIONSHIP (SUN)

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

07:00 08:00 09:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00

TIME

TE

MP

ER

AT

UR

E

Page 25: RPF 9 MAY 2007 TECHNOLOGY IN PRACTICE FEEDBACK ON CUTBACK SPECIFICATIONS Presentation by Johan Muller, Acknowledgement: Trevor Distin, Mike Zacharias,

Difference between road & air temperatures(sun & shade conditions)

Daytime Temperature Profile for 11/08/06

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

08H00 09H00 10H00 11H00 12H00 13H00 14H00 15H00Time

Tem

per

atu

re (

°C)

SHADE AIR TEMP

SHADE ROAD TEMP.

SUN AIR TEMP.

SUN ROAD TEMP.

Page 26: RPF 9 MAY 2007 TECHNOLOGY IN PRACTICE FEEDBACK ON CUTBACK SPECIFICATIONS Presentation by Johan Muller, Acknowledgement: Trevor Distin, Mike Zacharias,

What effect does rain & clouds have?Daytime Temperature Profile on 01/12/06

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

08H00 09H00 10H00 11H00 12H00 13H00 14H00 15H00 16H00

Time

Tem

per

atu

re (

°C)

SHADE AIR TEMP

SHADE ROAD TEMP.

SUN AIR TEMP.

SUN ROAD TEMP.

WIND RAIN

Page 27: RPF 9 MAY 2007 TECHNOLOGY IN PRACTICE FEEDBACK ON CUTBACK SPECIFICATIONS Presentation by Johan Muller, Acknowledgement: Trevor Distin, Mike Zacharias,

Monthly Average TemperaturesAverage Temperature Variation during OCTOBER 2006

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

25.0

30.0

35.0

40.0

45.0

50.0

AIR SHADE

08:00

09:00

10:00

11:00

12:00

13:00

14:00

15:00

16:00

ROAD SHADE

08:00

09:00

10:00

11:00

12:00

13:00

14:00

15:00

16:00AIR SUN

08:00

09:00

10:00

11:00

12:00

13:00

14:00

15:00

16:00

ROAD SUN

08:00

09:00

10:00

11:00

12:00

13:00

14:00

15:00

Time

Tem

per

atu

re (

°C)

min

max

average

AIR AIR

ROADROAD

SHADE

SUN

Page 28: RPF 9 MAY 2007 TECHNOLOGY IN PRACTICE FEEDBACK ON CUTBACK SPECIFICATIONS Presentation by Johan Muller, Acknowledgement: Trevor Distin, Mike Zacharias,

CUTBACK ALTERNATIVES

TWO CUTBACK OPTIONS

1) MC30 + 10-15% IP on site blending – discourage practice (HSE)

2) MC10 ~ MC30 + more cutter ex REFINERIES– Quality assurance excellent– Safer / controlled production environment

Page 29: RPF 9 MAY 2007 TECHNOLOGY IN PRACTICE FEEDBACK ON CUTBACK SPECIFICATIONS Presentation by Johan Muller, Acknowledgement: Trevor Distin, Mike Zacharias,

ONE OPTION STANDS OUT

• MC 10 REPLACING MC30• Australians ID same requirement

(AMC00)• MANUFACTURED BY REFINERIES• AMEND SANS 308 (SLOW PROCESS)• CUSTOMER REQUIREMENT

– BUY– SUPPLY– APPLY

Page 30: RPF 9 MAY 2007 TECHNOLOGY IN PRACTICE FEEDBACK ON CUTBACK SPECIFICATIONS Presentation by Johan Muller, Acknowledgement: Trevor Distin, Mike Zacharias,

IMPLICATIONS OF PRODUCT

NO COMPROMISES

• ENVIRONMENT – AP-R153– No effect on OZONE depletion– Heating cutbacks does not contribute to

GREENHOUSE GASSES– SMOG in urban areas?– Contribution to AIR POLLUTION SMALL

• Worker Safety• Refineries• Handling & Application

Page 31: RPF 9 MAY 2007 TECHNOLOGY IN PRACTICE FEEDBACK ON CUTBACK SPECIFICATIONS Presentation by Johan Muller, Acknowledgement: Trevor Distin, Mike Zacharias,

WAY FORWARD?

• Does RPF agree that TASK TEAM BE FORMED?

THEN• PROPOSAL

– NEW SPEC LOW VISCOSITY PRIME• Viscosity at ambient (25°C)• Remove penetration test requirement on residue

– REVISE SANS 308 (1971)– INCLUDE BITUMEN PRECOATING FLUIDS