RP: Cambodia: Provincial Roads Improvement Project (314D ... · Resettlement Plan . November 2011 ....

Resettlement Plan November 2011

CAM: Provincial Roads Improvement Project (314D, Cross-Border Facility, NR13) Prepared by Ministry of Public Works and Transportfor the Asian Development Bank.

ABBREVIATIONS

ADB – Asian Development Bank BST – bituminous surface treatment DMS – detailed measurement survey EMO – External Monitoring Organization FGD – focus group discussion IOL – inventory of losses IRC – Inter-ministerial Resettlement Committee M&E – monitoring and evaluation MEF – Ministry of Economy and Finance MPWT – Ministry of Public Works and Transport MRD – Ministry of Rural Development NR – National Road PDPWT – Provincial Department of Public Works and Transport PIB – public information brochure PMU – project management unit RCS – replacement cost study ROW – right of way RSCWG – resettlement sub-committee working group SES – socioeconomic survey SEU – social and environmental unit TA – Technical Assistance

NOTE

In this report, “$” refers to US dollars unless otherwise stated.

DEFINITION OF TERMS

Cut-off date – This refers to the date prior to which the occupation or use of the project area

makes residents/users of the same eligible to be categorised as affectedpeople. Persons not covered in the census are not eligible for compensation and other entitlements, unless they can show proof that (i) they have been inadvertently missed out during the census and the inventory of losses (IOL); or (ii) they have lawfully acquired the affected assets following completion of the census and the IOL and prior to the conduct of the detailed measurement survey (DMS).

Affected Household/ AffectedPeople

– In the context of involuntary resettlement, affectedpeople are those who are physically displaced (relocation, loss of residential land, or loss of shelter) and/or economically affected (loss of land, assets, access to assets, income sources, or means of livelihood) as a result of (i) involuntary expropriation of land, or (ii) involuntary restrictions on land use or on access to legally designated parks and protected areas. In the case of affected household, it includes all members residing under one roof and operating as a single economic unit, who are adversely affected by a project or any of its components.

Detailed Measurement Survey

– This activity involves the finalization and/or validation of the results of the IOL, severity of impacts, and list of affected people earlier done during resettlement plan preparation. The final cost of resettlement can be determined following completion of the DMS.

Entitlement – Refers to a range of measures comprising compensation, income restoration support, transfer assistance, income substitution, relocation support, etc. which are due to the affected people, depending on the type and severity of their losses, to restore their economic and social base.

Income restoration

– This is the re-establishment of sources of income and livelihood of the affected households.

Inventory of Losses

– This is the process where all fixed assets (i.e. lands used for residence, commerce, agriculture, including ponds; dwelling units; stalls and shops; secondary structures, such as fences, tombs, wells; trees with commercial value; etc.) and sources of income and livelihood inside the Project right-of-way are identified, measured, their owners identified, their exact location pinpointed, and their replacement costs calculated. Additionally, the severity of impact to the affected assets and the severity of impact to the livelihood and productive capacity of affected people will be determined.

Land acquisition – Refers to the process whereby an individual, household, firm or private institution is compelled by a public agency to alienate all or part of the land it owns or possesses to the ownership and possession of that agency for public purposes in return for compensation at replacement costs.

Relocation

– This is the physical relocation of a displaced people from her/his pre-project place of residence and/or business.

Replacement Cost

Means the amount in cash or in kind needed to replace an asset in its existing condition, without deduction of transaction costs or for any material salvaged, at prevailing market value, or its nearest equivalent, at the time of compensation payment. The replacement rates of affected assets as determined during the conduct of the replacement cost study (RCS) will be updated to reflect prevailing market values at the time of payment of compensation.

Replacement Cost Study

– This refers to the process involved in determining replacement costs of affected assets based on empirical data.

Resettlement Plan

- This is a time-bound action plan with budget, setting out the resettlement objectives and strategies, entitlements, activities and responsibilities, resettlement monitoring, and resettlement evaluation.

Severely affected

– This refers to affected households who will (i) lose 10% or more of their total productive land and/or assets, (ii) have to relocate; and/or (iii) lose 10% or more

households of their total income sources due to the Project. Vulnerable groups

– These are distinct groups of people who might suffer disproportionately or face the risk of being further marginalized by the effects of resettlement and specifically include: (i) households headed by women with dependents, (ii) disabled household heads, (iii) households falling under the generally accepted indicator for poverty, (iv) children and the elderly households who are landless and with no other means of support, and (v) landless households,.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................ 1

A. Introduction ........................................................................................................ 1

B. Scope of Land Acquisition and Resettlement...................................................... 1

C. Measures to Minimize Impacts and Resettlement .............................................. 2

D. Legal and Policy Framework .............................................................................. 2

E. Participation, Disclosure and Grievance Redress ............................................... 2

F. Vulnerability, and gender issues .......................................................................... 3

G. Implementation Arrangements ........................................................................... 3

H. Monitoring .......................................................................................................... 3

I. Resettlement Budget and Indicative Schedule of Resettlement Plan Implementation

3

II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION .................................................................................................. 4

A. Project Background ............................................................................................ 4

B. Description of 314D, CBF, and NR13 ................................................................. 4

C. Civil Works to be undertaken .............................................................................. 6

D. Measures being adopted to Minimize Adverse Social Impacts ........................... 6

III. SCOPE OF LAND ACQUISITION AND RESETTLEMENT ................................................. 8

A. Methodology Used In Determining Project Impacts ............................................ 8

B. Data Gathering Instrument ................................................................................. 8

C. The survey team ................................................................................................ 9

D. Setting of the cut-off date for eligibility ................................................................ 9

E. Replacement Cost Study (RCS) ......................................................................... 9

F. Affected fixed assets ........................................................................................... 9

IV. SOCIO-ECONOMIC INFORMATION AND PROFILE ...................................................... 25

A. Introduction ...................................................................................................... 25

B. Location and Type of Affected Assets of Sample AHs ....................................... 25

C. Demographic information on the Sample AHs .................................................. 27

D. Economic situation: income and expenses of the sample AHs ......................... 31

E. Amenities of the sample AHs ............................................................................ 35

V. INFORMATION DISCLOSURE, CONSULTATION AND PARTICIPATION ....................... 41

A. Participatory activities in RP Planning and Implementation ............................... 41

B. Public consultations during RP preparation ...................................................... 42

C. Disclosure of the Resettlement Plan ................................................................ 44

D. Consultation and Information Disclosure during RP Implementation ................ 44

VI. GRIEVANCE REDRESS MECHANISM ........................................................................... 45

VII. LEGAL AND POLICY FRAMEWORK ............................................................................. 46

A. Relevant Laws .................................................................................................. 46

B. ADB Policies .................................................................................................... 49

C. Coping with the Resettlement Policies of Funding Agencies ............................ 51

VIII. ENTITLEMENTS, ASSISTANCE AND BENEFITS ......................................................... 53

A. Objectives ........................................................................................................ 53

B. Key Principles .................................................................................................. 53

C. Entitlements ..................................................................................................... 55

D. Strategy to address gender issues ................................................................... 59

E. Strategy to assist vulnerable households .......................................................... 59

F. Unforeseen Impacts .......................................................................................... 59

IX. RELOCATION OF HOUSING AND SETTLEMENTS ....................................................... 59

A. Relocation Strategy .......................................................................................... 59

B. Temporary Impacts ........................................................................................... 60

X. INCOME RESTORATION AND REHABILITATION .......................................................... 60

A. General Provisions ........................................................................................... 60

B. Loss of productive land .................................................................................... 61

C. Loss of Business Income ................................................................................. 61

XI. RESETTLEMENT BUDGET AND FINANCING PLAN ..................................................... 62

A. Procedures for flow of funds ............................................................................. 62

B. Cost estimates and inflation adjustment .............. Error! Bookmark not defined.

C. Implementation, administration and contingency costs ..................................... 62

D. Estimated Costs of Resettlement ..................................................................... 62

XII. INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS .............................................................................. 64

A. Environmental and Social Office ....................................................................... 64

B. IRC and the Resettlement Department ............................................................. 64

C. Provincial Resettlement Sub-committee ........................................................... 65

D. Project Supervision Consultants ....................................................................... 66

XIII. IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE ................................................................................... 66

A. RP Updating and Implementation ..................................................................... 66

B. Indicative implementation schedule of the RP .................................................. 67

XIV. MONITORING AND REPORTING ................................................................................. 67

A. Indicators for Internal monitoring ...................................................................... 67

B. External monitoring agency .............................................................................. 68

vii

Appendixes

Appendix 1.1: Mitigation Option 62

Appendix 2.1: Socioeconomic Survey Questionnaire 63

Appendix 2.2: Inventory of Losses 64

Appendix 2.3 Master List of affected people 71

Appendix 2.4 Estimated of compensation unit price 84

Appendix 2.5 Minutes of GD Meetings/Attendance 85

Appendix 2.6 Resettlement sites 89

Appendix 2.7 Project Information Booklet 90

Appendix 2.8 Terms of Reference Replacement Cost 94

List of Tables

Table I.1 Indicative Resettlement Schedule 3

Table II.1 Districts and Communes Traversed by 314D 4

Table II.2 Districts and Communes Traversed by NR13 5

Table III.1 Occupied Right-of-Way Land According to Use (m2) 10

Table III.2 Land Losses (in m²) According to Gender of AH Heads 11

Table III.3. Location of Concentrated Commercial Areas in 314D 12

Table III.4. Location of Concentrated Commercial Areas in NR13 13

Table III.5 Number of Affected Main Structures According to Use 13

Table III.6 Affected Households with Affected House by Severity of Loss 14

Table III.7 Affected Households Losing House-Store by Severity 14

Table III.8 Affected Households with Affected Shops by Severity of Loss 15

Table III.9 Floor Area of Affected Houses by Construction Grade 314D 15

Table III.10 Floor Area of Affected Houses by Construction Grade NR13 16

Table III.11 Floor Area of House-stores by Construction Grade 314D 16

Table III.12 Floor Area of House-stores by Construction Grade NR13 16

Table III.13 Floor Area of Shops by Construction Grade 314D 17

Table III.14 Floor Area of Shops by Construction Grade NR13 17

Table III.15 Quantities of Affected Extended Eaves 18

Table III.16 Quantities of Fence 18

Table III.17 Assorted Secondary Structures 19

Table III.18 Affected Wells and Waiting Sheds NR13 19

Table III.19 Affected Electric and Communication Posts 20

Table III.20 Quantities of Affected Perennials 314D 20

Table III.21 Quantities of Affected Timber Trees 314D 21

Table III.22 Quantities of Affected Fruit and Timber Trees CBF 21

Table III.23 Quantities of Affected Perennials NR13 21

Table III.24 Quantities of Affected Timber Trees NR13 22

Table III.25 Range of Net Monthly Income of Partially Affected Shops 314D 22

Table III.26 Range of Net Monthly Income of Entirely Affected Shops PR 314D 23

Table III.27 Range of Net Monthly Income of Partially Affected Shops NR13 23

Table III.28 Range of Net Monthly Income of Entirely Affected Shops NR13 24

Table IV.1 Affected Assets of Sample AHs 314D 25

Table IV.2 Affected Assets of Sample AHs NR13 26

Table IV.3 Years in Possession of Affected Main Structures 26

Table IV.4 Civil Status of Head of Sample AHs 314D 27

Table IV.5 Civil Status of Head of Sample AHs NR13 27

Table IV.6 Head of Sample AHs by Physical Condition and Age 314D 28

Table IV.7 Head of Sample AHs by Physical Condition and Age NR13 29

Table IV.8 Educational Attainment of Head of Sample AHs 314D 29

Table IV.9 Educational Attainment of Head of Sample AHs NR13 30

Table IV.10 Number of Persons in the Sample AHs 314D 31

Table IV.11 Number of Persons in the Sample AHs NR13 31

Table IV.12 Primary Sources of Income of Sample AH Heads 314D 31

Table IV.13 Combined Monthly Income of Sample AHs 314D 32

Table IV.14 Monthly Expenses of Sample AHs 314D 33

Table IV.15 Primary Sources of Income of Sample AHs NR13 33

Table IV.16 Combined Monthly Income of Sample AHs IR13 34

Table IV.17 Monthly Expenses of Sample AHs IR13 34

Table IV.18 Main Source of Potable Water of the AHs 314D 35

Table IV.19 Main Source of Water for Washing of the AHs 314D 35

Table IV.20 Toilet Facilities Used by the AHs 314D 36

Table IV.21 Bathing Facilities Used by the AHs 314D 36

Table IV.22 Garbage Disposal Used by the AHs 314D 36

Table IV.23 Main Source of Power for Lighting 314D 36

Table IV.24 Main Source of Fuel for Cooking 314D 37

Table IV.25 Household Appliances 314D 37

Table IV.26 Ownership of Transportation 314D 37

Table IV.27 Main Source of Potable Water of the AHs NR13 38

Table IV.28 Main Source of Water for Washing of the AHs NR13 38

Table IV.29 Toilet Facilities Used by the AHs NR13 38

Table IV.30 Bathing Facilities Used by the AHs NR13 39

Table IV.31 Garbage Disposal Used by the AHs NR13 39

Table IV.32 Main Source of Power for Lighting NR13 39

Table IV.33 Main Source of Fuel for Cooking NR13 40

Table IV.34 Household Appliances NR13 40

Table IV.35 Ownership of Transportation NR13 40

Table V.1 Roles and Responsibilities of Key Stakeholders in the RP 41

Table G-V.2 Dates of Pre-IOL Consultations 44

ix

Table V.3 Dates of Post-IOL Consultations 44

Table VII.1 Resettlement Policy and Its Application in Cambodia 52

Table VIII.1 Entitlement Matrix 55

Table X.1 Loss of Land Use within Road Right of Way 61

Table X.2 Acquired Private Land at CBF 61

Table X.3 Income Loss Allowance 62

Table XI.1 Summary of Resettlement Costs (314D, CBF, NR13) 62

Table XIII.1 Indicative Schedule of Resettlement Activities 67

I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

A. Introduction

1. The Government of Cambodia, through the Ministry of Public Works and Transport (MPWT), has requested the Asian Development Bank (ADB) for a project preparatory technical assistance (TA) to prepare the Provincial Roads Improvement Project. The project aims to rehabilitate an aggregate of approximately 176 km of provincial road 314D, national road (NR) 13, 150B, NR53, and 151B, located in Prey Veng, Svay Rieng, Kampong Chhnang, and Kampong Speu provinces, to paved condition to provide a safer, cost-effective provincial road network with all-year access to markets and other social services for provincial centers of southeastern and mid-western Cambodia. The existing cross border facility (CBF) at Prey Var-Mocva will be expanded and developed to facilitate efficient cross border transport and trade between Cambodia and Vietnam. This resettlement plan is for 314D, the CBF, and NR13. (See Figure 1 for the project location map).

B. Scope of Land Acquisition and Resettlement

2. The major impacts caused by the project in the rehabilitation of 314D and NR13 include demolition of structures used for residence and business, and acquisition of occupied land in the road right-of-way (ROW). According to the inventory of losses (IOL) conducted in 20 May 2011 – 2 June 2011, around 697 households (215 in 314D and 482 in NR13) in 19 communes (7 in 314D and 12 in NR13) are affected by the loss of fixed assets and sources of incomes or livelihoods.1Forty-fivehouseholds in 314D and 108 households in NR13 are affected by impacts on their homes and house-and-shops, of which 20 households in 314D and 26 households in NR13 will lose entirely their homes and house-and-shops and will need to reconstruct behind the construction corridor. Moreover, 62 households in 314D and 114 households in NR13 are affected by impacts on their independent shops (i.e., detached from other buildings), of which 45 households in 314D and 57 households will have to relocate their business behind the construction corridor. In 314D, some 27,936 square meter (m2) of land in the ROW are used or occupied by private households (12,004 m2 for agriculture and 15,932 m2 for residence and business), while in NR13, around 47,398.3 m2 of land in the ROW are used or occupied by private households (44,681 m2 for agriculture and 2,717 m2 for residence and business). Other fixed structures affected include fences, concrete pavements, extended eaves, pipe culverts and sign boards. In addition, 96 electric and telecommunication posts (75 in 314D and 21 in NR13) need to be relocated behind the COI. Around 12,140 perennials and timber trees (2,234 in 314D and 9,906 in NR13) need to be removed from the COI.

3. In the expansion of the CBF at Prey Var, an aggregate of 24,945.12 m2 of private land will be acquired, in addition to twohouses and onestore with a combined floor area of 90 m2. Fifteenperennial and 583 timber trees owned by these private individuals will likewise be acquired. Twoabsentees (i.e., living abroad or in Phnom Penh) and onelanded local farmer own the affected plots of land. Twoother households have built structures on the land of twoof the landowners to oversee the properties. The existing CBF facilities are standing on a 10,982 m2 government land.

1 This number excludes the 14 houses and shops in 314D and the 44 houses and shops in NR13 whose owners

could not be determined at the time of the IOL because said structures were unattended or locked.

2

2

C. Measures to Minimize Impacts and Resettlement

4. In order to avoid or minimize displacement of people from assets and livelihoods, the existing road alignment will be followed and construction works will be confined within a COI of 10 meters (m) measured either way from the road centerline. In addition, as part of the Project’s resettlement strategy, affected peoplewill be provided sufficient time to rebuild their homes and shops prior to the commencement of civil works and that they are able to continue with their present livelihood activities even during Project implementation. Also, all standing annual crops, including privately-owned trees, will be allowed to be harvested before the start of civil works in a particular section of the Project road. The MPWT, through its Project Management Unit (PMU) 3 and the Inter-ministerial Resettlement Committee (IRC), through the Resettlement Department at the Ministry of Economy and Finance (RD-MEF), will ensure that this resettlement strategy is carried through diligently.

D. Legal and Policy Framework

5. This resettlement planhas been prepared to address land acquisition and resettlement in the rehabilitation of 314D and NR13, consistent with ADB’s Safeguard Policy Statement (June 2009) and relevant laws and regulations of the Royal Government of Cambodia, notably the 1993 Constitution, the 2001 Land Law, 2010 Expropriation Law, and Prakas (Government Order) No. 6, dated 27 September 1999. The resettlement plan includes the resettlement policy and specific time-bound and budgeted measures for mitigating the adverse social impacts of the Project, and for rehabilitating all physically and economically displaced persons.

6. The basic compensation and rehabilitation principles adopted in this resettlement plan are: (i) land acquisition is minimized if avoidance is not possible; (ii) compensation and cash and no-cash assistance will be provided to help ensure that affected persons are able to maintain, if not improve, their pre-Project living standards; (iii) affected persons are fully informed and consulted on compensation and relocation options; (iv) existing socio-cultural institutions of affected persons are supported and used; (v) the project resettlement policy will equally apply to women and men; (vi) lack of formal title will not be a bar to compensation and rehabilitation; (vii) particular attention will be extended to vulnerable groups, such as households headed by women and the elderly with no other social support; (viii) resettlement is planned and implemented as an integral part of the project and that the budget for resettlement is part of Project costs; and (ix) affected persons are not displaced from assets until they are fully compensated for the same.

E. Participation, Disclosure and Grievance Redress

7. Key information on the draft resettlement plan has been disclosed to the affected persons through the holding in June 2011 of public meetings to: (i) present the results of the IOL; (ii) discuss the salient points of the Project resettlement policy in general term; and (iii) find out from the affected persons their suggestions and preferences regarding compensation, allowances and assistance, relocation of structures, grievance redress and participation. A project information leaflet in Khmer will be distributed to the affected persons in the first half of September 2011. Likewise, during the first half of September 2011, the draft resettlement plan will be posted in provincial, district, and commune offices and on the ADB website. Following concurrence by ADB of the resettlement plan, the summary of the agreed resettlement plan will again be disclosed to the affected peoplewith its posting at local government offices, while the full text of the approved resettlement plan will be uploaded on the ADB website (www.adb.org). Social monitoring reports will be made available to the affected peopleand will be submitted to ADB for web posting.

3

8. In case of grievances, the affected persons will first lodge their complaint with the commune office. If within 15 days settlement could not be reached, the grievance would be elevated to the district office. If the same could still not be settled at the district level, the complaint would be lodged at the provincial office. A court of law is the final arbiter of complaints that are not settled at the local government levels.

F. Vulnerability, and gender issues

9. The IOL has provisionally identified 157 women-headed households, 86 affected householdsthat are headed by persons within the retirement age bracket of the Government (i.e., 60 years and older), 6 affected households that are headed by persons with disabilities, and 176 affected households living on very low incomes. Additional measures are incorporated in the resettlement plan to help ensure that these affected households, who are considered particularly vulnerable, are not further disadvantaged and that, along with the other affected households, they will equally benefit from the Project.

G. Implementation Arrangements

10. The MPWT, through PMU3 and the Social and Environmental Office (SEO), and the Inter-ministerial Resettlement Committee (IRC), through the Resettlement Department of the Ministry of Economy and Finance (RD-MEF), are overall responsible for preparing, updating, implementing and financing the resettlement plan. At the local government level, the MPWT and IRC are assisted by Resettlement Subcommittee in the provinces and districts through the Resettlement Sub-committee Working Groups (RSWG).

H. Monitoring

11. The SEO is the Project’s internal monitor, while an external monitoring organization will be hired by IRC to do external monitoring and evaluation (M&E). During resettlement plan implementation, which is reckoned to begin at the time of the detailed measurement survey (DMS), quarterly progress report of internal monitoring and semi-annual external M&E report will be submitted to ADB. Within one year after the completion of resettlement plan implementation, a resettlement completion report will be submitted to ADB that includes lessons learned to improve resettlement work in future projects.

I. Resettlement Budget and Indicative Schedule of Resettlement Plan Implementation

12. The total costs of resettlement for provincial roads 314D and NR 13 and construction of the CBF is $1,380,966.58. Below is an indicated schedule of resettlement plan preparation and implementation.

Table I.1 Indicative Resettlement Schedule Activities Schedule

Resettlement Plan preparation June – November 2011 ADB concurrence of draft resettlement plan November 2011 Resettlement Plan updating April 2012 Submission to and ADB concurrence of updated resettlement plan June 2012 Implementation of the approved updated resettlement plan July – December 2012 Internal monitoring (submission of quarterly reports) April 2012 – December 2012 External Monitoring (submission of bi-annual M&E reports) April 2012 – December 2013

ADB = Asian Development Bank, M&E = monitoring and evaluation.

4

4

II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION

A. Project Background

13. In response to the Government of Cambodia’s request for TA to prepare the Provincial Roads Improvement Project, the ADB mobilized a group of international and national consultants in March 2011. The TA was for a period of 14 months with most of the outputs of the consultants being completed in the first 6 months. Among others, the TA consultants were tasked to do the following:

a. Prepare the engineering design for the upgrading of NR13 and 314D. The overall length of these roads is 91 kilometer (km).

b. Prepare the engineering design for the upgrading of 150B, NR53 and 151B. The overall length of these roads is approximately 85 km.

c. Prepare the engineering design for a CBF at Prey Var-Mocva that will provide efficient cross border transport and trade between Cambodia and Vietnam.

B. Description of 314D, CBF, and NR13

14. Provincial Road 314D is gravel road and it starts from NR1 in Prasout Village, Kandieng Reay commune, Svay Teab in Svay Rieng Province. It runs for 26.6 km to the south and ends at the Cambodia-Vietnam Border in Prey Var village, Thmei commune, Kampong Rou district. The ROW of 314D is 40 m, measured 20 m each way from the road centerline.2 With the exception of several locations where the road crosses a bustling business center (such as Rou village in Kampong Rou), the existing ROW is basically clear of structures, interspersed occasionally by huts used for selling goods. Shops within 8 m either way from the centerline of the road are found in Ro Village. Table below lists the districts and communes traversed by 314D.

Table II.1 Districts and Communes Traversed by 314D Province District Km Point Communes Village

Svay Teab Kandieng Reay Prasout Ti Muoy Prasout Ti Pi Prasout Angk Ta Mouk Prey Rumduol Pou Vong Kampong Rou Preah Ponlea Pring Chrum Trapeang Run Tradaet Prey Thum Prey Sakum Nhor Trapeang Chhlonh Rou Svay Anat

Trapeang Trav Ksetr Ruessei Am Thmei Ou Prey Var

km = kilometer.

15. The CBF at Prey Var will be expanded and developed under the proposed project. The present CBF is located on a 10.9 hectare (ha) land and an additional 2.49 ha of land adjacent to

2 Government decree Prakas 6, “Measures to Crack Down on Anarchic Land Grabbing and Encroachment” (dated 27

September 1999), set the ROW for 2-digit national roads at 25 m from the road centerline, and for provincial roads at20 m from the road centerline.

5

the present facilities will be acquired. The CBF is located on the right hand side of 314D towards the Vietnam border.

16. NR13 starts from NR1 at Thmey village, Sangkhor commune, Svay Rieng town in Svay Rieng province. It runs northward for about 65 km before joining NR8 in Veal Smach village, Krabau commune, Kamchay Mear district in the province of Prey Neng. For the first 43 km, the road, with a carriageway of typically 6 m, is paved with double surface treatment (DBST). The remaining 22 km of the road is earth and gravel. There is visibly more traffic on NR13 than on 314D. However, there are more densely populated areas traversed where houses and shops are built close to the carriageway, such as in Chak village (Kompong Chak commune), Kampong Trach village (Kampong Trach commune), and Samruong village (Angk Prasrae commune). Also, there are more perimeter fences put up by the residents close to the carriageway.

Table II.2 Districts and Communes Traversed by NR13 Province District Communes Km Point Village

Svay Rieng Sangkhor Thmey Bak Ronorse Thlork Preah Tonle Po Phlear Akna Kot Rom Duol Kampong Chak Chak Prey Keav Sangkae Kouk Srama Ta Naeng Poun Ta Chou Chrung Popel Trapeang Kruos Trapeang Kraet Preah Angk Kaev Krouch Kampong Ampil Trasak Trapeang Damrei Romeas Haek Angk Prasrae Samraong Trapeang Rumdenh Thnal Peam Andoung Pou Bos Kokir Trapeang Tbal Trapeang Choar Trapeang Banteay Areaks Svay Kampong Trach Chong Ou Ta Trav Kampong Trach Amkpil Tuek Vil Trapeang Prei Ta Mau Trapeang Popel Ampil Traok Tras Muni Proeksa Voat Andoung Trabaek Trapeang Smach Andoung Trabaek Kamchay Krabau Tboung Voat

6

6

Province District Communes Km Point Village

Mear Veal Smach km = kilometer, NR = national road.

C. Civil Works to be undertaken

17. NR13 and 314D will be paved with single bituminous treatment (SBST) and will have a standard carriageway of 7 m (i.e. 3.5 m either way from the centerline) and a paved shoulder of 1 m on each side of the carriageway. Existing bridges will be replaced and will have the same width as the road. Culverts will be extended or replaced as necessary. Ditches through major commune centers will be lined and covered, and the road will be raised on embankments in flood-prone areas.

18. The existing CBF facilities at Prey Var are very basic. Land to the east of the road is being developed by private owners and land to the east has government buildings offering greater scope for the CBF location. The design of the improvement of the CBF at Prey Var will be patterned, albeit smaller, after that of the Bavet-Moc Bai CBF located at the end of NR1 bordering Vietnam.

D. Measures being adopted to Minimize Adverse Social Impacts

19. The following measures have been adopted in order to minimize adverse social impacts:

a. There will be no re-alignment of any segment of the road sections.

b. A corridor of only 10 m from either side of the road centerline will be cleared of obstructions. 314D has a ROW of 40 m (i.e., 20 m from either side of the road centerline) while NR13 has a ROW of 50 m (i.e., 25 m from either side of the road centerline).

20. The construction of concrete and covered side drains in major commune centers will also reduce the COI in said locations. The carriageway and paved shoulder will only be 4.5 m from the centerline and additional 2 m would be needed for the construction of a side drain on each side of the road. The covered side drain can double as sidewalk. Following completion of detailed engineering design, the data on affected assets and people will be updated to reflect any reduction in the COI in commune centers.

21. Owners of entirely affected shops will be allowed to construct replacement structures before demolishing the existing ones in order to minimize, if not avoid, income loss arising from the disruption of business operation. Prior to and after the conduct of the IOL, local officials and residents have been advised to refrain from building new fixed structures along the COI.

7

CBF

8

8

III. SCOPE OF LAND ACQUISITION AND RESETTLEMENT

A. Methodology Used In Determining Project Impacts

22. The potential impacts of the Project have been determined with the conduct of the IOL where all fixed assets (i.e., lands used for residence, commerce, agriculture, including ponds; dwelling units; stalls and shops; miscellaneous structures, such as fences, tombs, wells; trees with commercial value; etc.) located inside the COI were identified, tagged, measured, their owners identified, their exact location pinpointed, and their replacement values calculated. Likewise, the severity of impact on the affected assets and the severity of impact to the livelihood and productive capacity of persons affected by such losses were determined. Photographs of the affected assets with a placard indicating their location and owners had been taken. Also, information on the households of the affected persons, such as sources of livelihood, income level, and ownership of productive assets were gathered. The IOL and census of affected peoplein 314D were conducted 20–25 May 2011 and in NR13 on 26 May to 2 June 2011. The IOL and census affected peoplein the proposed expanded CBF were conducted on 5–7 August 2011 based on preliminary information of the boundaries of the expanded area of the CBF.

B. Data Gathering Instrument

23. The basic tool used in the IOL and census of affected peoplewas a survey questionnaire. Detailed socioeconomic information on the household of affected peoplewhose main structures (i.e., houses and shops but excluding government buildings) stand to be partially or entirely affected was obtained with the use of a survey questionnaire written in Khmer. The questionnaire is divided into 3 sections. The first section seeks basic socioeconomic information on the displacd people, while the second section deals on the affected assets and livelihoods. The third section seeks information on other landholdings of the affected people’s households, including relocation options for those who lose entire houses and shops. (See Appendix 1 for a copy of the IOL questionnaire).

24. The survey of affected land in 314D and NR13 was limited to measuring the areas of land within the COI on each side of the roadway that were visibly occupied, and determining their use (i.e., for agriculture, residence, commerce, both for residence and commerce). With the exception of ROW land with houses and shops that were attended to when the survey team conducted the IOL and census of displacd people, it was impossible for the team to determine the identities of the occupants or users of land in the COI. It was likewise impossible for the survey team to determine the boundaries, and therefore the areas, of cultivated or built-on plots of ROW land in open swathes of land adjacent to the roadway because said occupied lands are not demarcated and there are no cadastral plans available. Also, even for plots of ROW land that had structures on them, the names and gender of the users or occupants of said plots of ROW land could not be determined if said houses and shops were locked or unattended to during the survey.

25. In view thereof, the survey team could only estimate the area of cultivated land (i.e., farmland) and woodlands (i.e., degraded public forest with naturally growing tree species) within the COI. Relatedly, the survey team could only estimate the area of ROW land used for residence and commerce that had structures on them (i.e., footprint of the structures) and those that are fenced in. These estimates will be validated and corrected as necessary during the updating of the resettlement plan, with the assistance of commune officials who will also sit as members of the Provincial RSWG, the main resettlement body that is tasked to carry out the

9

DMS.

26. Plots of land to be acquired in the expansion and development of the CBF are private. The identities of the owners of these plots of land, including residents who serve as caretakers of the properties, have been determined. Fixed assets found on the properties have also been surveyed.

C. The survey team

27. Other than an international and a domestic resettlement consultants, a team of 13 research assistants that included a survey coordinator, 8 enumerators, 2 computer data encoders, 1 statistician, and 1 replacement cost (market rates) researcher was organized to help prepare this resettlement plan. Except for the statistician and the replacement cost study (RCS) researcher, the rest of the local research assistants were based in the field. The research team was accompanied by commune or village officials in their data gathering activities.

D. Setting of the cut-off date for eligibility

28. The survey team met with district and commune officials, including the local population, prior to the commencement of the IOL and census of affected people. Among others, the purpose of said public meetings was to discuss the need for the IOL and socioeconomic survey (SES) and to explain the Project policy on cut-off date for eligibility to resettlement entitlements. For the purpose of the preparation of the resettlement plan, local official and residents were informed that the cut-off date coincides with the announcement about the Project and the completion of the IOL and census of the affected peoplein the districts, which was 25 May 2011 for 314D and 2 June 2011 for NR13. The list of affected peoplewill be updated and/or validated during the DMS following approval by project authorities of the project feasibility study. The IRC, the government body that is tasked to spearhead the conduct of the DMS and the implementation of the resettlement plan, will confirm the final date of the cut-off-date.

E. Replacement Cost Study (RCS)

29. In parallel with the conduct of the IOL and census of AHs, an RCS was carried out by a professional appraiser. The objective of the RCS was to establish compensation rates for land, structures, trees and crops that are sufficient for AHs to acquire or purchase a replacement for assets lost to the Project without deductions for taxes, and/or costs of transaction. The IOL survey team members and the RCS specialist spent some time visiting the project sites and agreed on the classifications to use in categorizing the various affected structures.

F. Affected fixed assets

1. Land

30. A total of [number] ha of land will be acquired for the Project in 314D, NR13 and for the CBF. All affected lands in 314D and NR13 are within the ROW and as such are State public land. However, affected plots of land in the expanded CBF are private.

31. 314D. A total of 27,936.2 m² of ROW land in 314D that are occupied or used by local residents will be cleared for the Project. Of these, 51.19% (14,300 m²) are used for residence, while 42.97% (12,004 m²) are cultivated, and 5.84% (1,632.2 m²) are used for commercial activities. All affected plots of land in 314D are inside the ROW and not covered with title or with legally recognized proof of ownership.

10

10

32. NR13. Some 47,398.3m² of ROW land in NR13 will be cleared for the Project. Of this, 94.27% (44,681.3m²) is cultivated, while 3.57% (1,690.1 m²) is used for residence, and 2.17% (1,026.9 m²) is used for commercial activities. There is no private land (i.e., covered by title or with legally recognized proof of ownership) affected in the rehabilitation of NR13.

33. CBF. In connection with the expansion and development of the CBF at Prey Var, a total of 24,945.72m² of private plots of land belonging to 3 individuals will be acquired. Of the private land to be acquired, 48.65% (12,135.12 m2) is rain-fed farmland belonging to a landed farming household. Grazing land makes up 42.33% (10,560 m2) of the total private land to be acquired, and this belongs to a Cambodian national presently living abroad. The rest of the private land to be acquired (2,250.6 m2) is residential land belonging to the owner of an adjacent property that is being developed into a hotel. Government land in the present CBF area is 10,982m².

Table III.1 Occupied Right-of-Way Land According to Use (m2)

Commune Residential Commercial Farmland Total

314D

Kandeang Reay 1,677.4 808.5 60.0 2,545.9 Prasout 3,624.9 6.0 4,978.0 8,608.9 Preah Ponlea 1,414.0 329.0 0.0 1,743.0 Prey Thum 24.0 0.0 12.0 36.0 Nhor 4,161.9 96.5 720.0 4,978.4

Ksetr 2,767.8 0.0 4.0 2,771.8 Thmei 630.0 392.2 6,230.0 7,252.2 Total 14,300.0 1,632.2 12,004.0 27,936.2 NR13 Sangkhor 126.0 48.0 12,420.0 12,594.0 Kampong Chak 265.9 128.1 6,445.4 6,839.4 Sangkae 0.0 0.0 5,345.8 5,345.8 Chrung Popel 201.2 120.0 4,311.0 4,632.2 Kampong Ampil 106.0 0.0 810.0 916.0 Angk Prasrae 148.5 88.0 3,840.0 4,076.5 Andoung Pou 107.0 60.0 4,204.0 4,371.0 Kampong Trach 429.0 582.8 4,545.8 5,557.6 Amkpil 22.5 0.0 845.3 867.8 Andoung Trabaek 14.0 0.0 16.0 30.0 Krabau 270.0 0.0 1,898.0 2,168.0 Total 1,690.1 1,026.9 44,681.3 47,398.3

km = kilometer, NR = national road.

34. In settlement areas and business centers, the identities of occupants of affected ROW lands had been determined. However, occupants or users of swathes of cultivated ROW land between settlement areas could not be determined, including plots of land in settlement areas with no houses or shops or when said houses or shops were unattended to during the IOL and census of AHs. Their identities will be determined with the active involvement of local cadastral officials during the DMS. Table below gives a breakdown of the affected ROW land in 314D and NR13 according to the gender of the head of the affected households (AHs).

11

Table III.2 Land Losses (in m²) According to Gender of AH Heads

Gender of Head of AH

Residential Commercial Farmland Grazing

land Total

314D

Male 8,331.0 1,213.2 60.0 9,604.2

Female 3,504.0 217.0 0.0 3,721.0

Owners not known 2,465.0 202.0 11,944.0* 14,611.0

Total 14,300.0 1,632.2 12,004.0 27,936.2

CBF+

Male 2,250.6 0.0 12,135.1 10,560.0 24,945.72

Female 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

Total

NR13

Male 1,526.6 596.4 16,342.6 18,465.6

Female 118.5 45.5 4,769.7 4,933.7

Owners not known 45.0 385.0 23,569.0* 23,999.0

Total 1,690.1 1,026.9 44,681.3 47,398.3 m

2 = square meter, NR = national road.

*Strips of cultivated ROW land outside settlement areas. +Excluding the 10,982 m2 of government land at the CBF

2. Main Structures

35. 314D: A total of 107 main structures3 in 314D are adversely affected by the road improvement. Of this number, 57.94% (62 structures) are independent shops; while 33.64% (36 structures) are houses, and 8.41% (9 structures) are house-and-shops (see Table C-8).

36. Houses. Of the 36 affected houses in 314D, 6 were locked and unattended at the time of the survey. Therefore, the identities of the owners of these structures could not be obtained. All of these 6 unattended houses are entirely affected. Of the remaining 30 affected houses in 314D, 21 belong to male-headed households, of which 9 are entirely affected. Moreover, 4 of the affected houses belonging to male-headed households are being rented out for about $25 per month per house. There are 9 affected houses owned by women-headed households, of which 3 are entirely affected. (see Table III.6).

37. The 18 partially affected houses in 314D have an aggregate floor area of 397.8 m2. Five partially affected houses of construction grade of 2J (i.e., single floor with plastered brick walls, concrete columns, and concrete floor) account for 48.14% (or 191.5 m2) of the floor area of partially affected houses. The 18 entirely affected houses in 314D (comprising 9 of male-headed households, 3 of women-headed households and 6 of unidentied owners) have an aggregate floor area of 594.0 m2. Of this area, houses of 2J construction grade account for 29.46% (or 175 m2), followed by houses of 2C construction grade (i.e., single floor with earthen wall combined with temporary material, such as metal sheet, wood, thatch, or plastic; wooden posts; and earthen floor) that account for 26.94% (or 160 m2) of the aggregate floor area of entirely affected houses (see Table III.9).

38. House-and-stores. Of the 9 affected house-and-stores in 314D, 6 belong to male-headed

3 These include houses, buildings, and shops with four walls (not moveable temporary structures of

ambulant vendors).

12

12

households, of which 2 are entirely affected. All 3 house-and-stores that belong to women-headed households are partially affected (see Table C-10).

39. The 7 partially affected house-and-stores in 314D have an aggregate floor area of 103.5 m2, while the 2 entirely affected house-and-stores have an aggregate floor area of 26.0 m2 only. All of the affected house-and-stores in 314D are of construction grades 2 (see Table C-14).

40. Independent shops. Of the 62 affected shops in 314D, 8 were locked and unattended at the time of the survey. 7 of these unattended shops are entirely affected. Of the remaining 54 affected shops in 314D, 36 belong to male-headed households, of which 28 are entirely affected. On the other hand, of the 18 affected shops owned by women-headed households, 10 are entirely affected (see Table C-11).

41. The 17 partially affected independent shops in 314D have an aggregate floor area of 167.0 m2. 4 shops of construction grade 2F (i.e., single floor with metal sheet walls, low quality wooden posts, and earthen floor) account for 27.54% (46.0 m2) of the combined floor area of the partially affected shops. The aggregate floor area of entirely affected shops in 314D is 1,003.2 m2. 16 shops of 2C construction grade account for 27.26% (273.5 m2) of the combined floor area of entirely affected shops (see Table C-16).

Table III.3. Location of Concentrated Commercial Areas in 314D

District Communes Village No. Affected Shops*

Kampong Rou Nhor Rou Ksetr Ruessei Am Thmei Ou

*Includes stand-alone shops and house-cum-shops

42. CBF: 3 concrete single floor buildings4 with a combined floor area of 332.0 m2 and a 32 m2 thatched hut (construction grade 2C) all belonging to the custom and immigration offices at the CBF are entirely affected. The household taking care of the affected grazing land has a 35 m2 house (construction grade 1C) and a 35 m2 shop (construction grade 1B), while the household taking care of the affected private residential has a 20 m2 house-and-shop of construction grade 1A. These caretaker households are male-headed and their houses and shops are affected entirely.

43. NR13. A total of 222 main structures in NR13 are adversely affected by the road improvement. Of this number, 51.35% (114 structures) are independent shops, while 47.30% (105 structures) are houses, and 1.35% are (3 structures) house-and-shops.

44. Houses. 24 of the 105 affected houses in NR13 were locked and unattended at the time of the survey. 6 of these unattended houses are entirely affected. 57 of the remaining 81 affected houses in NR13 belong to male-headed households, of which 12 are entirely affected. Moreover, 1 of the affected houses belonging to a male-headed household is being rented out for about $25 per month. Of the 24 affected houses owned by women-headed households, 8 are entirely affected (see Table C-9).

45. The 79 partially affected houses in NR13 have an aggregate floor area of 910.3 m2. 18 partially affected houses of construction grade of 2F account for 27.50% (or 250.30 m2) of the

4 By construction grade, 2 buildings are of construction grade 3D with a combined floor area of 236 m

2,

and 1 building of construction grade 2J with a floor area of 96 m2.

13

floor area of partially affected houses. 14 other partially affected houses of 2J construction grade account for 25.82% (235.0 m2) of the combined floor area of partially affected houses. The 26 entirely affected houses in NR13 have an aggregate floor area of 717.5 m2. Of this area, 7 houses of 2FJ construction grade account for 32.47% (or 233.0 m2), followed by 7 other houses of 2C construction grade that account for 26.90% (or 193.0 m2) of the aggregate floor area of entirely affected houses (see Table C-13).

46. House-and-stores. 2 of the affected house-and-stores in NR13 belong to male-headed households, while 1 belongs to a woman-headed household. All 3 house-and-stores are partially affected (see Table C-10).

47. The 3 partially affected house-and-stores in NR13 have an aggregate floor area of 35.0 m2 only. 2 of these house-and-stores are of construction grade 2J and have an aggregate area of 23.0 m2. There are no entirely affected house-and-stores in NR13 (see Table C-15).

48. Independent shops. 20 of the 114 affected shops in NR13 were locked and unattended at the time of the survey. 6 of these unattended shops are entirely affected. 73 of the remaining 94 affected shops in NR13 belong to male-headed households, of which 45 are entirely affected. 1 of the affected shops belonging to a male-headed household is being rented out for about $25 per month. Of the 21 affected shops owned by women-headed households, 6 are entirely affected (see Table C-11).

49. The 57 partially affected independent shops in NR13 have an aggregate floor area of 549.3 m2. 23 shops of construction grade 2F account for 40.92% (224.8 m2) of the combined floor area of the partially affected shops. The aggregate floor area of the 57 entirely affected shops in NR13 is 1,416.1 m2. 16 shops of 2F construction grade account for 25.07% (355.0 m2) of the combined floor area of entirely affected shops (see Table C-17).

Table III.4. Location of Concentrated Commercial Areas in NR13

District Communes Village No. Affected

Shops*

Rom Duol Kampong Chak Chak Romeas Haek Angk Prasrae Samraong Kampong Trach Kampong Trach

NR = national road. *Includes stand-alone shops and house-cum-shops

Table III.5 Number of Affected Main Structures According to Use

Commune House House-and-

store Store/shops Total

314D Kandeang Reay 6 4 7 17 Prasout 10 2 11 23 Preah Ponlea 0 0 6 6 Prey Thum 0 0 0 0 Nhor 5 3 21 29 Ksetr 13 0 6 19 Thmei 2 0 11 13 Total 36 9 62 107 CBF* Thmei 1 1 1 3

14

14

Commune House House-and-

store Store/shops Total

Total 1 1 1 3

NR13 Sangkhor 15 1 23 39 Kampong Chak 28 0 14 42 Sangkae 10 0 16 26 Chrung Popel 13 0 7 20 Kampong Ampil 2 0 9 11 Angk Prasrae 9 1 6 16 Andoung Pou 5 0 7 12 Kampong Trach 22 1 19 42 Amkpil 1 0 8 9 Andoung Trabaek 0 0 1 1 Krabau 0 0 4 4 Total 105 3 114 222

CBF = cross-border facility, NR = national road. Excluding the 3 concrete offices and 1 thatched hut of the customs and immigration offices.

Table III.6 Affected Households with Affected House by Severity of Loss

Commune

Male Headed Women Headed Unknown Owners*

Partial Entire Total Partial Entire Total Partial Entire Total

314D Kandeang Reay 5 0 5 1 0 1 0 0 0 Prasout 2 4 6 1 0 1 0 3 3 Nhor 1 1 2 0 1 1 0 2 2 Ksetr 4 4 8 3 2 5 0 0 0 Thmei 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 Total 12 9 21 6 3 9 0 6 6 CBF Thmei 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 NR13 Sangkhor 6 1 7 4 1 5 2 1 3 Kampong Chak 12 2 14 6 1 7 6 1 7 Sangkae 3 2 5 2 1 3 0 2 2 Chrung Popel 6 2 8 3 0 3 1 1 2 Kampong Ampil 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 Angk Prasrae 7 0 7 0 1 1 1 0 1 Andoung Pou 2 1 3 0 2 2 0 0 0 Kampong Trach 9 3 12 1 1 2 7 1 8 Amkpil 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 Total 45 12 57 16 8 24 18 6 24

CBF = cross-border facility, NR = national road. *Houses were closed and un-attended at the time of the survey.

Table III.7 Affected Households Losing House-Store by Severity

Commune



314D Kandeang Reay 3 0 3 1 0 1 0 0 0 Prasout 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 Nhor 1 0 1 2 0 2 0 0 0 Total 4 2 6 3 0 3 0 0 0 CBF

15

Commune



Thmei 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 NR13 Sangkhor 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Angk Prasrae 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 Kampong Trach 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 2 0 2 1 0 1 0 0 0

CBF = cross-border facility, NR = national road. *House-stores were closed and un-attended at the time of the survey.

Table III.8 Affected Households with Affected Shops by Severity of Loss

Commune



314D Kandeang Reay 1 6 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 Prasout 1 5 6 3 1 4 0 1 1 Preah Ponlea 0 2 2 2 1 3 0 1 1 Nhor 3 8 11 1 5 6 0 4 4 Ksetr 1 4 5 0 1 1 0 0 0 Thmei 2 3 5 2 2 4 1 1 2 Total 8 28 36 8 10 18 1 7 8 CBF Thmei 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 NR13 Sangkhor 3 9 12 4 4 8 1 2 3 Kampong Chak 5 5 10 1 1 2 2 0 2 Sangkae 2 8 10 5 0 5 1 0 1 Chrung Popel 2 4 6 0 0 0 0 1 1 Kampong Ampil 2 5 7 0 0 0 1 1 2 Angk Prasrae 3 3 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 Andoung Pou 4 2 6 1 0 1 0 0 0 Kampong Trach 5 6 11 2 1 3 5 0 5 Amkpil 1 0 1 1 0 1 4 2 6 Krabau 1 3 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 Andoung Trabaek 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 Total 28 45 73 15 6 21 14 6 20

CBF = cross-border facility, NR = national road. *Shops were closed and un-attended at the time of the survey.

Table III.9 Floor Area of Affected Houses by Construction Grade 314D

Partially Affected Entirely Affected

Structure Classification Frequency Area (m²)


1A 1 24.0 1A 0 0.0 1C 0 0.0 1C 1 25.0 1D 0 0.0 1D 2 41.0 2B 0 0.0 2B 1 8.0 2C 1 4.0 2C 6 160.0 2D 0 0.0 2D 1 48.0 2F 5 145.3 2F 4 137.0 2G 2 13.0 2G 0 0.0 2J 6 191.5 2J 3 175.0

16

16




3C 1 9.0 3C 0 0.0 4A 2 11.0 4A 0 0.0

Total 18 397.8 Total 18 594.0 m

2 = square meter.

Table III.10 Floor Area of Affected Houses by Construction Grade NR13




1C 1 18.0 1C 0 0.0 1E 1 6.5 1E 1 36.0 2A 1 12.5 2A 1 24.0 2B 7 71.5 2B 1 20.0 2C 2 33.8 2C 7 193.0 2D 2 30.5 2D 0 0.0 2E 2 13.0 2E 2 51.0 2F 18 250.3 2F 7 233.0 2G 5 34.3 2G 2 54.0 2H 3 48.0 2H 4 90.5 2I 1 5.5 2I 0 0.0 2J 14 235.0 2J 0 0.0 2K 1 9.0 2K 0 0.0 3C 6 40.8 3C 1 16.0 4A 12 83.8 4A 0 0.0 4B 2 17.8 4B 0 0.0

Total 78 910.3 Total 26 717.5 m

2 = square meter.

Table III.11 Floor Area of House-stores by Construction Grade 314D




2A 0 0.0 2A 1 20.0 2B 1 28.5 2B 0 0.0 2C 0 0.0 2C 1 6.0 2E 1 4.0 2E 0 0.0 2F 2 36.0 2F 0 0.0 2J 3 35.0 2J 0 0.0

Total 7 103.5 Total 2 26.0 m

2 = square meter.

Table III.12 Floor Area of House-stores by Construction Grade NR13

Structure Classification

Partially Affected

Entirely Affected Frequency Area (m²)

2J 2 23 0

2B 1 12 0

Total 3 35 0 m


17

Table III.13 Floor Area of Shops by Construction Grade 314D




1A 0 0.0 1A 2 52.0 1B 0 0.0 1B 1 6.5 1C 2 34.0 1C 6 95.0 1E 0 0.0 1E 1 24.0 2A 0 0.0 2A 2 30.0 2B 3 34.5 2B 4 119.0 2C 3 8.5 2C 16 273.5 2F 4 46.0 2F 5 126.0 2G 0 0.0 2G 4 123.2 2H 2 22.0 2H 0 0.0 2J 2 15.0 2J 4 154.0 3C 1 7.0 3C 0 0.0

Total 17 167.0 Total 45 1,003.2 m

2 = square meter.

Table III.14 Floor Area of Shops by Construction Grade NR13

Partially affected Entirely affected

Structure Classification

Frequency Entire

Total affected area (m²)

Structure Classification Frequency

Total affected area (m²)

1A 2 22.0 1A 4 87.0

1B 0 0.0 1B 1 30.0

1C 1 15.0 1C 4 63.5

1E 0 0.0 1E 2 57.0

2A 7 79.5 2A 4 189.5

2B 8 35.5 2B 3 43.0

2C 4 52.0 2C 10 212.0

2D 1 12.0 2D 0 0.0

2E 3 29.5 2E 0 0.0

2F 23 224.8 2F 16 355.0

2G 1 8.0 2G 0 0.0

2H 3 29.0 2H 8 234.0

2J 4 42.0 2J 4 132.6

2K 0 0.0 2K 1 12.5

Total 57 549.3 Total 57 1,416.1

3. Secondary (miscellaneous) structures

50. 314D: Affected secondary structures of various construction grades in 314D include 83 pieces of fence with an aggregate length of 12,677.2 linear meters; 107 pieces of extended eaves with an aggregate area of 2,515.4 m2 (normally used as shops); 89 pieces of concrete pavement with an aggregate area of 1,970.0 m2; 473 pieces of concrete pipe culverts; a 16 m2 concrete public waiting shed; 12 pieces of metal signboards, and 2 concrete pagoda gates. In addition, 135 electric and telecommunication posts will need to be relocated behind the COI.

51. CBF: The customs and immigration offices at the CBF will also lose a thatched shed and

18

18

a stupa (small altar for venerating spirits of deceased relatives). Additionally, a concrete fence of construction grade F6 and measuring 206 meters long will be acquired.

52. NR13: Affected secondary structures of various construction grades in NR13 include 126 pieces of fence with an aggregate length of 22,269.6 linear meters; 399 extended eaves with an aggregate area of 7,496.5 m2 (normally used as shops); 284 pieces of concrete pavement with an aggregate area of 7,455m2; 13 pieces of tiled pavement with an aggregate area of 218 m2; 3 deep wells and 4 dug wells; 11 pieces of concrete pipe culverts; 10 waiting sheds with an aggregate area of 224 m2; 9 pieces of metal signboards, and 3 concrete pagoda gates. In addition, 21 electric and telecommunication posts will need to be relocated behind the COI.

Table III.15 Quantities of Affected Extended Eaves




314D 1C 1 15.0 1C 2 77.0 2A 4 79.5 2A 4 125.0 2B 24 486.0 2B 25 578.2 2C 0 0.0 2C 5 123.0 2D 0 0.0 2D 1 30.0 2F 0 0.0 2F 15 268.0 2G 0 0.0 2G 1 11.0 2J 3 29.0 2J 15 452.2 2I 0 0.0 2I 1 21.0 3C 3 64.1 3C 2 141.4 4A 0 0.0 4A 1 15.0 Total 35 673.6 Total 72 1,841.8 NR13 1A 12 157.0 1A 44 1,042.9 2A 121 1,678.5 2A 113 2,452.2 2F 0 0.0 2F 1 12.0 4A 8 146.0 4A 46 898.8 4B 28 369.0 4B 26 741.0 Total 169 2,350.5 Total 230 5,146.9 m


Table III.16 Quantities of Fence


Structure Classification Length (m) Structure Classification Length (m)

314D F1 10,077.0 F1 168.5 F2 1,460.2 F2 465.5 F3 0.0 F3 14.0 F4 220.0 F4 121.0 F5 53.0 F5 22.0 F6 0.0 F6 76.0 Total 11,810.2

867.0

CBF F6 0.0 F6 206.0 Total 0.0 206.0 NR13 F1 19,168.0 F1 87.0

19


Structure Classification Length (m) Structure Classification Length (m)

F2 1,341.2 F2 191.5 F3 587.9 F3 349.0 F4 327.0 F4 211.0 F5 3.0 F5 0.0 F6 4.0 F6 0.0 Total 21,431.1 Total 838.5

CBF = cross-border facility, m =meter, NR = national road.

Table III.17 Assorted Secondary Structures

Communes Concrete

pavement (m²)

Tiled Pavement

(m2)

Pipe Culvert (Count)

Metal Sheet Sign Board

(Count)

Concrete Pagoda gate

(Count)

314D

Kandeang Reay 410.0 0.0 20.0 5.0 0.0

Prasout 110.5 0.0 14.0 0.0 1.0

Preah Ponlea 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Prey Thum 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Nhor 1,327.0 0.0 11.0 6.0 1.0

Ksetr 5.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0

Thmei 117.5 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0

Total 1,970.0 0.0 473.0 12.0 2.0

NR13

Sangkhor 737.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0

Kampong Chak 2,008.0 63.0 1.0 1.0 1.0

Sangkae 940.0 16.0 1.0 1.0 0.0

Chrung Popel 715.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0

Kampong Ampil 122.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0

Angk Prasrae 475.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 0.0

Andoung Pou 494.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0

Kampong Trach 1,868.0 139.0 1.0 1.0 0.0

Amkpil 81.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0

Andoung Trabaek 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0

Krabau 15.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Total 7,455.0 218.0 11.0 9.0 3.0 m


Table III.18 Affected Wells and Waiting Sheds NR13

Commune

Deep Well (Count)

Dug Well (Count)

Waiting Shed (m2)

Construction Grade Area (m2)

Sangkhor 0 1 2H 25 Kampong Chak 0 0 2F 9 Sangkae 1 0 2G 43 Chrung Popel 1 0 2H 14 Kampong Ampil 0 0 2H 13 Angk Prasrae 1 1 2G 14 Andoung Pou 0 1 2H 18 Kampong Trach 0 0 2H 52 Amkpil 0 0 2G 21 Andoung Trabaek 0 1 2F 15 Krabau 0 0 - 0 Total 3 4 - 224

20

20

Table III.19 Affected Electric and Communication Posts

Communes Concrete Steel Wooden

314D Kandeang Reay 4 3 0 Prasout 0 0 0 Preah Ponlea 0 0 0 Prey Thum 0 0 0 Nhor 48 0 69 Ksetr 5 0 0 Thmei 0 0 6 Total 57 3 75 NR13 Sangkhor 2 0 4 Kampong Chak 0 2 5 Sangkae 1 0 0 Chrung Popel 2 0 0 Kampong Ampil 1 0 0 Angk Prasrae 1 0 0 Andoung Pou 1 0 0 Kampong Trach 1 0 0 Amkpil 0 0 0 Andoung Trabaek 0 0 0 Krabau 1 0 0 Total 10 2 9

NR = national road.

4. Affected crops and trees

53. All standing annual crops will be allowed to be harvested before the start of civil works in a particular section of the Project road. This can be achieved with the synchronization of the start of civil works and the cropping schedule of AHs cultivating plots of land in the ROW. In the event that crops can not be harvested before construction, AHs will be compensated at replacement cost.

54. 314D: A total of 584 perennials of various species and age will be cleared from the COI in 314D. These trees are not commercially grown but sporadically planted inside the ROW. Of this number, 82 are not yet bearing fruits. In addition, some 1,650 of timber trees of commercial value will also be cleared from the COI.

Table III.20 Quantities of Affected Perennials 314D

Type of Perennial

Categories

1* 2 3 Total

Mango 14 124 10 148 Jackfruit 12 25 3 40 Teuk Doh Kor 2 14 0 16 Coconut 2 18 0 20 Betel nut 1 5 5 11 Palm tree 3 145 31 179 Kampingreah 9 0 6 15 Guava 4 0 17 21 Papaya 2 2 3 7 Tamarind 1 3 11 15 Cashew 0 4 2 6

21

Type of Perennial

Categories

1* 2 3 Total

Others 32 36 38 106 Total 82 376 126 584

*Not yet bearing fruits

Table III.21 Quantities of Affected Timber Trees 314D

Type of Timber Trees

Categories

Total 1 2 3

Pine tree 0 10 0 10 Chankiry 0 0 30 30 Bamboo 8 100 270 378 Cassia 10 246 612 868 Eucalyptus 0 1 44 45 Chhat 0 1 4 5 Flamboyant tree 0 1 13 14 Loeung Reach 0 0 3 3 Rubber tree 0 1 0 1 Smach 0 0 148 148 Other trees 0 13 135 148 Total 18 373 1,259 1,650

55. CBF: A total of 583 timber trees and 15 fruit trees on private and government land will be acquire in the expansion and development of the CBF.

Table III.22 Quantities of Affected Fruit and Timber Trees CBF

Type of Trees

Categories

Total 1 2 3

Coconut 0 3 0 3 Palm 0 5 7 12 Shade tree (Chankiri) 0 0 9 9 Acacia 344 230 0 574

56. NR13: A total of 966 perennials of various species and age will be cleared from the COI in NR13. These trees are not commercially grown but sporadically planted inside the ROW. Of this number, 195 are not yet bearing fruits. In addition, some 8,940 of timber trees of commercial value will also be cleared from the COI.

Table III.23 Quantities of Affected Perennials NR13

Type of Perennial

Categories

Total 1* 2 3

Mango 86 333 29 448 Coconut 21 12 2 35 Betel nut 8 0 6 14 Tamarind 1 8 0 9 Jackfruit 18 30 3 51 Palm tree 13 85 1 99 Teuk Doh Kor 0 4 0 4 Papaya 2 15 0 17 Guava 9 4 19 32 Cashew 37 8 0 45 Other tree 0 163 49 212

22

22

Type of Perennial

Categories

Total 1* 2 3

Total 195 662 109 966 *Not yet bearing fruits

Table III.24 Quantities of Affected Timber Trees NR13

Type of Timber Trees

Categories

1 2 3 Total

Pine Tree 2 0 0 2 Chankiry 38 0 1 39 Bamboo 3,188 1 8 3,197 Cassia 5,140 15 0 5,155 Eucalyptus 39 2 21 62 Chhat 0 18 2 20 Flamboya 0 9 0 9 Loeungreach 0 4 0 4 Other tree 0 452 0 452 Total 8,407 501 32 8,940

5. Net incomes from shops

57. Information on the monthly net incomes of households with partially and entirely affected shops in 314D and NR13 were obtained for the purpose of calculating the probable loss in income these households would incur if they were to totally stop operation during re-construction and/or relocation.

58. 314D: Among the 10 households in 314D whose shops are partially affected and who responded to the query on net income, 6 claimed to be earning a net income of less than $100 a month, while 2 claimed to earn a net income of between $101 and $200 a month. 2 others claimed to earn a net income of more than $200 a month from their shops. Similarly, among the 26 households losing entire shops who responded to the query on net income, 15 households (57.69% of the respondents) claimed to be earning a net income of less than $100 a month, while 6 households (23.08%) claimed to earn a net income of between $101 and $200 a month. 5 others claimed to earn a net income of more than $200 a month from their shops.

59. NR13: Among the 39 households in NR13 whose shops are partially affected and who responded to the query on net income, 30 (76.92% of the respondents) claimed to be earning a net income of less than $100 a month, while 7 claimed to earn a net income of between $101 and $200 a month. 2 others claimed to earn a net income of more than $200 a month from their shops. Similarly, among the 43 households losing entire shops would responded to the query on net income, 29 (67.44% of the respondents) claimed to be earning a net income of less than $100 a month, while 10 households (23.26%) claimed to earn a net income of between $101 and $200 a month. 4 others claimed to earn a net income of more than $200 a month from their shops.

Table III.25 Range of Net Monthly Income of Partially Affected Shops 314D

Head of AH Commune

Net Monthly Income Total

$100 or Less

$101 - $200

> $200 N/A*

Male Kandeang Reay 0 0 1 0 1

Prasout 1 0 0 0 1

Nhor 1 0 1 1 3

23

Head of AH Commune

Net Monthly Income Total

$100 or Less

$101 - $200

> $200 N/A*

Ksetr 0 0 0 1 1

Thmei 0 1 0 1 2

Total 2 1 2 3 8

Female Prasout 2 0 0 1 3

Preah Ponlea 0 1 0 1 2

Nhor 0 0 0 1 1

Thmei 2 0 0 0 2

Total 4 1 0 3 8

Owners not known Thmei

1 1

Total

1 1

*No answer

Table III.26 Range of Net Monthly Income of Entirely Affected Shops PR 314D

Head of AH Commune

Net Monthly Income

Total $100 or Less

$101 - $200

> $200 N/A*

Male

Kandeang Reay 1 0 3 2 6

Prasout 2 0 1 2 5


Nhor 4 2 0 2 8

Ksetr 1 0 0 3 4

Thmei 0 2 0 1 3

Total 8 5 5 10 28

Female

Prasout 0 0 0 1 1


Nhor 4 0 0 1 5

Ksetr 1 0 0 0 1

Thmei 2 0 0 0 2

Total 7 1 0 2 10

Owners not known

Prasout

1 1

Preah Ponlea

1 1

Nhor

4 4

Thmei

1 1

Total

7 7 *No answer

Table III.27 Range of Net Monthly Income of Partially Affected Shops NR13

Gender Commune

Net Monthly Income

Total $100 or Less

$101 - $200

>$200 N/A

Male Sangkhor 1 1 1 0 3

Kampong Chak 3 0 1 1 5

Sangkae 0 1 0 1 2

Chrung Popel 2 0 0 0 2

Kampong Ampil 2 0 0 0 2

Angk Prasrae 3 0 0 0 3

Andoung Pou 3 0 0 1 4

Kampong Trach 3 1 0 1 5

Amkpil 0 1 0 0 1

Krabau 1 0 0 0 1

24

24

Gender Commune

Net Monthly Income

Total $100 or Less

$101 - $200

>$200 N/A

Total 18 4 2 4 28

Female Sangkhor 3 1 0 0 4


Sangkae 4 1 0 0 5



Amkpil 1 0 0 0 1

Andoung Trabaek 0 1 0 0 1

Total 12 3 0 0 15

Owners not known

Kampong Chak

2 2

Sangkae

1 1

Kampong Ampil

1 1

Kampong Trach

5 5

Amkpil

4 4

Total

13 13

Table III.28 Range of Net Monthly Income of Entirely Affected Shops NR13

Gender Commune

Net Monthly Income

Total $100 or Less

$101 - $200

>$200 N/A

Male Sangkhor 7 1 0 0 8


Sangkae 1 0 2 5 8






Krabau 1 1 1 0 3

Total 25 8 4 8 45

Female Sangkhor 3 1 0 0 4



Total 4 2 0 0 6

Owners not known Chrung Popel

1 1

Kampong Ampil

1 1

Amkpil

2 2

Total

4 4

25

IV. SOCIO-ECONOMIC INFORMATION AND PROFILE

A. Introduction

60. A socioeconomic survey (SES) of the affected households (AHs) was conducted in parallel with the IOL. A sample of at least 20% of AHs losing entire houses and shops and sources of income, and a sample of at least 10% of AHs are affected by the partial loss of their houses and shops, were randomly selected from the list of affected households generated immediately following the IOL in each road section. In road sections where there were less than 50 severely affected households, the SES covered 100% of the severely affected while maintaining the 10% sample size of the partially affected AHs. Not covered in the SES were AHs affected only by the loss of secondary structures, such as fences, gates, driveways, in addition to randomly grown trees (i.e., not in a commercial plantation or orchard) inside the COI.

61. The SES gathered information on the AHs’ living standards and living conditions as well as their perceptions towards the project. Information gathered has guided the preparation of an appropriate resettlement strategy for the Project. The SES data set also serves as a baseline of AH living conditions to form part of the monitoring and evaluation data that will assess the extent to which the measures of this resettlement plan are effective in mitigating land acquisition and resettlement impacts.

B. Location and Type of Affected Assets of Sample AHs

62. 314D: 26 of the 51 male-headed AHs and 9 of the 26 women-headed AHs surveyed in 314D are affected by the partial or entire loss of their houses. In addition, 17 male-headed AHs and 11 women-headed AHs are affected by the partial or entire loss of their house-and-stores. Another 8 male-headed AHs and 56 women-headed AHs are affected by the partial or entire loss of their independent shops. The affected structures of the sample AHs are mostly located in the communes of Kandien Reay, Prasout, Nhor, and Ksetr.

Table IV.1 Affected Assets of Sample AHs 314D

Gender of AH Head

Commune Affected assets

Total House House-store Shop

Male Kandieng Reay 5 9 1 15

Prasout 7 1 1 9

Preah Ponlea 0 1 0 1

Nhor 2 5 3 10

Ksetr 12 1 1 14

Thmei 0 0 2 2

Total 26 17 8 51

Female Kandieng Reay 1 1 0 2

Prasout 1 0 2 3


Nhor 0 6 1 7

Ksetr 6 0 0 6

Thmei 1 3 1 5

Total 9 11 6 26

63. NR13: In NR13, thirty-four of the 72 male-headed AHs and 6 of the women-headed AHs surveyed are affected by the partial or entire loss of their houses. In addition, 26 male-headed AHs and 4 women-headed AHs are affected by the partial or entire loss of their

26

26

house-and-stores. Another 12 male-headed AHs and 4 women-headed AHs are affected by the partial or entire loss of their independent shops. The affected structures of the sample AHs are mostly located in the communes of Kampong Chak and Kampong Trach.

Table IV.2 Affected Assets of Sample AHs NR13

Gender of AH Head

Commune Affected assets

Total House House-store Shop

Male Sangkhor 4 3 1 8

Kampong Chak 4 4 3 11

Sangkae 0 3 0 3

Chrung Popel 6 0 1 7

Kampong Ampil 3 1 2 6

Angk Prasrae 4 0 2 6

Andoung Pou 4 2 1 7

Kampong Trach 9 8 1 18

Amkpil 0 1 1 2

Andoung Trabaek 0 1 0 1

Krabau 0 3 0 3

Total 34 26 12 72

Female Kampong Chak 2 1 0 3

Sangkae 2 1 1 4

Chrung Popel 1 0 0 1

Angk Prasrae 0 1 0 1

Kampong Trach 1 0 2 3

Amkpil 0 1 1 2

Total 6 4 4 14

64. In 314D, 36 of the 51 male-headed AHs (or 70.59%) and 20 of the 26 women-headed AHs (or 76.92%) have been living or in occupation of their affected houses and shops for 5 to 9 years already. In NR13, while 31 of the 72 male-headed AHs (or 43.06%) have been living or in occupation of their affected houses and shops for 5 to 9 years already, 22 other AHs (30.56%) have been living or in occupation of their affected houses and shops for 1 to 2 years only. Women-headed AHs in NR13 seem to have settled to live and conduct business inside the road right-of-way more recently than male-headed AHs.

Table IV.3 Years in Possession of Affected Main Structures

Gender of AH Head Years in

possession

Affected assets Total

House House-store Shop

314D

Male 1 – 2 Ys 3 1 1 5

3 – 4 Ys 5 3 2 10

5 – 9 Ys 18 13 5 36

Total 26 17 8 51

Female 1 – 2 Ys 0 4 0 4

3 – 4 Ys 1 1 0 2

5 – 9 Ys 8 6 6 20

Total 9 11 6 26

NR13

Male 1 – 2 Ys 10 9 3 22

3 – 4 Ys 5 8 4 17

5 – 9 Ys 19 7 5 31

Over 9 ys 0 2 0 2

27

Gender of AH Head Years in

possession

Affected assets Total

House House-store Shop

Total 34 26 12 72

Female 1 – 2 Ys 3 0 1 4

3 – 4 Ys 2 4 1 7

5 – 9 Ys 1 0 2 3

Over 9 ys 0 0 0 0

Total 6 4 4 14

C. Demographic information on the Sample AHs

1. Marital status of sample AH Heads

65. Majority (52.94% or 27 persons) of the 51 sample male household heads in 314D are married, while 23 other male household heads are still single. On the other hand, widowed and married women have an equal number of 9 each (34.6% each of the sample 26 AH heads). Also, single women AH heads account for 26.92% the sample women-headed AHs.

Table IV.4 Civil Status of Head of Sample AHs 314D

Gender of AH Head

Commune Civil Status

Total Single

Widow/ Widower

Married Divorced

Male Kandieng Reay 8 0 7 0 15

Prasout 3 0 6 0 9


Nhor 5 0 4 1 10

Ksetr 5 0 9 0 14

Thmei 2 0 0 0 2

Total 23 0 27 1 51

Female Kandieng Reay 0 1 1 0 2

Prasout 2 0 1 0 3


Nhor 2 3 2 0 7

Ksetr 3 2 1 0 6

Thmei 0 2 2 1 5

Total 7 9 9 1 26

66. In NR13, most (97.22% or 70 persons) of the 72 sample male household heads are married. In contrast, all of the while 23 other male household heads are still single. On the other hand, widowed and married women have an equal number of 9 each (34.6% each of the sample 26 AH heads). Also, single women AH heads account for 26.92% the sample women-headed AHs.

Table IV.5 Civil Status of Head of Sample AHs NR13

Gender of AH Head


Total Widow/Widower Married

Male Sangkhor 0 8 8

Kampong Chak 0 11 11

Sangkae 0 3 3

Chrung Popel 0 7 7

Kampong Ampil 0 6 6

Angk Prasrae 0 6 6

28

28

Gender of AH Head


Total Widow/Widower Married

Andoung Pou 0 7 7

Kampong Trach 1 17 18

Amkpil 1 1 2

Andoung Trabaek 0 1 1

Krabau 0 3 3

Total 2 70 72

Female Kampong Chak 3 0 3

Sangkae 4 0 4

Chrung Popel 1 0 1

Angk Prasrae 1 0 1

Kampong Trach 3 0 3

Amkpil 2 0 2

Total 14 0 14

2. Physical condition and age of sample AH Heads

67. None of the sample male AH heads in 314D is disabled, although 11 (21.57%) of the 51 male respondents are aged 60 or older. 5 (19.23%) of the 26 women respondents are aged 60 years or older. In addition 2 of the women respondents have disabilities.

Table IV.6 Head of Sample AHs by Physical Condition and Age 314D

Gender of AH Head

Physical condition

Commune Age grouping

Total < 60 Years > 60 Years

Male Normal Kandieng Reay 13 2 15

Prasout 9 0 9

Preah Ponlea 1 0 1

Nhor 4 6 10

Ksetr 12 2 14

Thmei 1 1 2

Total 40 11 51

Female Normal Kandieng Reay 1 1 2

Prasout 3 0 3

Preah Ponlea 3 0 3

Nhor 4 3 7

Ksetr 4 0 4

Thmei 4 1 5

Total 19 5 24

Handicapped Ksetr 2 0 2

Total 2 0 2

68. In NR13, nine (12.50%) of the 72 male respondents are aged 60 years or older, 2 of whom also have disabilities. None of the women respondents has disabilities, although 3 fall within the elderly age bracket.

29

Table IV.7 Head of Sample AHs by Physical Condition and Age NR13

Gender of AH Head

Physical condition

Commune

Age AH Grouping

Total < 60 Years

> 60 Years

Male

Normal Sangkhor 8 0 8

Kampong Chak 6 5 11

Sangkae 3 0 3

Chrung Popel 6 0 6

Kampong Ampil 6 0 6

Angk Prasrae 6 0 6

Andoung Pou 6 1 7


Amkpil 2 0 2


Krabau 3 0 3

Total 63 7 70

Handicapped

Chrung Popel 0 1 1

Kampong Trach 0 1 1

Total 0 2 2

Female

Normal

Kampong Chak 1 2 3

Sangkae 3 1 4

Chrung Popel 1 0 1

Angk Prasrae 1 0 1

Kampong Trach 3 0 3

Amkpil 2 0 2

Total 11 3 14

3. Ethnicity and religion of the sample AH Heads

69. All respondent AH heads in 314D and NR13 are Khmer. All of them are Buddhists by religion.

4. Educational attainment of the sample AH Heads

70. Majority (49.02% or 25 persons) of the 51 male respondents in 314D went to high school but did not graduate, while 11 (21.57%) of the male respondents only reached primary school. 4 (7.84%) did not attend school. Among the 26 women AH heads, 9 (34.62%) went to high school but did not graduate, and only 1 did not attend school.

Table IV.8 Educational Attainment of Head of Sample AHs 314D

Gender of AH Head

Commune

Educational attainment

Total None Primary

Finished Elementary

Not finished

high school

Finished high

school

Male Kandieng Reay 2 4 1 7 1 15

Prasout 0 3 1 4 1 9

Preah Ponlea 0 0 0 1 0 1

Nhor 1 2 1 4 2 10

Ksetr 1 1 2 8 2 14

Thmei 0 1 0 1 0 2

Total 4 11 5 25 6 51

30

30

Gender of AH Head

Commune


Total None Primary

Finished Elementary

Not finished

high school

Finished high

school

Female Kandieng Reay 0 1 0 1 0 2

Prasout 1 0 1 1 0 3


Nhor 0 4 2 0 1 7

Ksetr 0 1 1 4 0 6

Thmei 0 2 1 2 0 5

Total 1 8 6 9 2 26

71. In NR13, majority (48.61% or 35 persons) of the 72 male respondents attended high school but did not graduate, while 20 (27.78%) of the male respondents only reached primary school. Five(6.94%) did not attend school. None of the 14 women AH heads attended school, however.

Table IV.9 Educational Attainment of Head of Sample AHs NR13

Gender of AH Head

Commune


Total None Primary

Finished Element

ary

Not finished

high school

Finished high

school

College

graduate

Male Sangkhor 0 1 2 5 0 0 8

Kampong Chak 1 2 0 6 2 0 11

Sangkae 0 0 0 3 0 0 3

Chrung Popel 0 2 0 5 0 0 7

Kampong Ampil 0 1 3 2 0 0 6

Angk Prasrae 0 2 1 2 1 0 6

Andoung Pou 0 3 0 3 1 0 7

Kampong Trach 3 8 0 7 0 0 18

Amkpil 1 0 0 0 0 1 2

Andoung Trabaek 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

Krabau 0 0 0 2 0 1 3

Total 5 20 6 35 4 2 72

Female Kampong Chak 3

3

Sangkae 4

4

Chrung Popel 1

1

Angk Prasrae 1

1

Kampong Trach 3

3

Amkpil 2

2

Total 14

14

5. Household size of the sample AHs

72. The 77 sample AHs in 314D are composed of 225 male and 155 female members. The average household size in 314D is 4.96. In NR13, the 86 sample AHs are made up of 214 male and 205 female members. The average household size in NR13 is 4.93.

31

Table IV.10 Number of Persons in the Sample AHs 314D

Commune Number of Persons in the AH

No of AH Average AH Size Male Female

Kandieng Reay 52 34 17 5.1

Prasout 33 21 12 4.5

Preah Ponlea 5 8 4 3.3

Nhor 51 32 17 4.9

Ksetr 66 42 20 5.4

Thmei 18 18 7 5.1

Total 225 155 77 4.9

Table IV.11 Number of Persons in the Sample AHs NR13

Commune

Number of Persons in the Affected Households No of HH

Average HH Size

Male Female

Sangkhor 25 20 8 5.6

Kampong Chak 35 39 14 5.3

Sangkae 10 15 7 3.6

Chrung Popel 13 15 8 3.5

Kampong Ampil 18 12 6 5.0

Angk Prasrae 16 19 7 5.0

Andoung Pou 22 13 7 5.0

Kampong Trach 50 57 21 5.1

Amkpil 13 6 4 4.8

Andoung Trabaek 5 3 1 8.0

Krabau 7 6 3 4.3

Total 214 205 86 4.9

D. Economic situation: income and expenses of the sample AHs

1. 314D

73. Almost half (43.14% or 22 AHs) of the 51 sample male AH heads derive their main source of income from farming. Another 13 male-headed AHs (25.49%) are primarily involved in selling food and non-food items. While a significant percentage (34.62% or 9 persons) of the 26 sample women AH heads are earning through selling goods, an equally significant percentage (30.77% or 8 persons) are not involved in productive activities.

Table IV.12 Primary Sources of Income of Sample AH Heads 314D

Gender of AH Head

Commune

Primary Source of Income

Total None/

retired/ old/ sick

Farming Selling goods

Factory/ shop

worker

Private employee

Remittance (Cambodia

) Other*

Male Kandieng Reay

0 9 3 0 1 0 2 15

Prasout 0 3 4 1 0 0 1 9

Preah Ponlea

0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1

Nhor 4 2 2 0 1 0 1 10

32

32

Gender of AH Head

Commune

Primary Source of Income

Total None/

retired/ old/ sick

Farming Selling goods

Factory/ shop

worker

Private employee

Remittance (Cambodia

) Other*

Ksetr 1 7 4 0 0 0 2 14

Thmei 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2

Total 6 22 13 1 2 0 7 51

Female Kandieng Reay

1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2

Prasout 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 3

Preah Ponlea

0 0 3 0 0 0 0 3

Nhor 3 1 2 0 0 1 0 7

Ksetr 2 1 2 0 0 0 1 6

Thmei 0 2 1 0 0 1 1 5

Total 8 5 9 0 0 2 2 26

*Other: Motor bike and bicycle repair, and hair dresser.

74. More than half (53.0% or 27 AHs) of the 51 male-headed sample AHs reportedly have a monthly household income of less than $65/month for a family of 5 people in rural areas. Nine (17.65%) other male-headed AHs have monthly household income of $65 ~ $100. Similarly, half (50.0% or 13 AHs) of the 26 sample women-headed AH have a monthly household income below $65. Another 7 (26.92%) women-headed AHs live on the borderline of poverty.

Table IV.13 Combined Monthly Income of Sample AHs 314D

Gender of AH Head

Commune

Combined Monthly Income of AHs

Total < $65

>$65 ~ $100

$101 ~ $200

$201 ~ $300

$301 ~ $500

> $500

Male Kandieng Reay 2 6 4 1 1 1 15

Prasout 7 0 1 0 1 0 9

Preah Ponlea 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

Nhor 7 0 3 0 0 0 10

Ksetr 10 2 2 0 0 0 14

Thmei 1 0 1 0 0 0 2

Total 27 9 11 1 2 1 51

Female Kandieng Reay 1 1 0 0 0 0 2

Prasout 1 2 0 0 0 0 3


Nhor 4 2 0 1 0 0 7

Ksetr 2 2 1 1 0 0 6

Thmei 4 0 1 0 0 0 5

Total 13 7 4 2 0 0 26

75. It can be seen from table below that the sample AHs could only spend for their needs within the limits of their incomes. A number of them, however, are apparently spending beyond what they earn in a month and are probably in debt.

33

Table IV.14 Monthly Expenses of Sample AHs 314D

Gender of AH Head

Commune

Combined Monthly Expenses

Total < $65

>$65 ~ $100

$101 ~ $200

$201 ~ $300

$301 ~ $500

> $500

Male Kandieng Reay 1 5 4 3 1 1 15

Prasout 5 2 2 0 0 0 9


Nhor 4 3 3 0 0 0 10

Ksetr 4 7 3 0 0 0 14

Thmei 1 0 1 0 0 0 2

Total 15 17 14 3 1 1 51

Female Kandieng Reay 2 0 0 0 0 0 2

Prasout 2 1 0 0 0 0 3


Nhor 3 3 1 0 0 0 7

Ksetr 3 1 1 1 0 0 6

Thmei 3 1 1 0 0 0 5

Total 13 6 6 1 0 0 26

2. NR13

76. The 3 most common primary livelihood of the 72 sample male AH heads are running repair shops/barber shops (33.33%), farming (30.56%), and selling food and non-food items (18.06%). While majority (42.86%) of the 14 sample women AH heads are earning through selling goods, an equally significant percentage (35.71%) are not involved in productive activities.

Table IV.15 Primary Sources of Income of Sample AHs NR13

Gender of AH Head

Commune

Primary source(s) of income

Total

None/ retire

d

Farm

live stoc

k

Sell good

s

Factory/

shop worker

Govt Private emplo

yee

Repair shop/ barber

Male Sangkhor 0 1 0 0 0 4 0 3 8

Kampong Chak 2 2 0 2 0 1 0 4 11

Sangkae 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 3

Chrung Popel 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 3 7

Kampong Ampil 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 4 6

Angk Prasrae 0 3 0 1 0 1 0 1 6

Andoung Pou 0 5 0 2 0 0 0 0 7

Kampong Trach 0 8 0 2 0 0 2 6 18

Amkpil 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 2

Andoung Trabaek

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1

Krabau 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 3

Total 2 22 0 13 0 9 2 24 72

Female Kampong Chak 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3

Sangkae 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 4

Chrung Popel 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

Angk Prasrae 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

Kampong Trach 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 3

34

34

Gender of AH Head

Commune

Primary source(s) of income

Total

None/ retire

d

Farm

live stoc

k

Sell good

s

Factory/

shop worker

Govt Private emplo

yee

Repair shop/ barber

Amkpil 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2

Total 5 1 1 6 1 0 0 0 14

77. More than half (52.78% or 38 AHs) of the 72 male-headed sample AHs reportedly have a monthly household income of less than $65/month. 12 (16.67%) other male-headed AHs have a monthly household income of $65 ~ $100. In contrast, only 4 (28.57%) of the 14 sample women-headed AH have a monthly household income below $65. Five(35.71%) women-headed AHs reportedly earn a monthly income of $101 ~ $200. The amount of poor people will be confirmed during Detailed Measurement Survey and updating the RP based on appropriate poverty line.

Table IV.16 Combined Monthly Income of Sample AHs IR13

Gender of AH Head

Commune

Combined Monthly Income of AHs

Total < $65

>$65 ~ $100

$101 ~ $200

$201 ~ $300

$301 ~ $500

> $500



Sangkae 3 0 0 0 0 0 3






Amkpil 1 0 1 0 0 0 2


Krabau 3 0 0 0 0 0 3

Total 38 12 12 2 4 4 72

Female Kampong Chak 1 1 0 0 1 0 3

Sangkae 2 0 1 1 0 0 4




Amkpil 0 1 0 0 0 1 2

Total 4 2 5 1 1 1 14

78. It can be seen from table below that a number of the sample AHs spend beyond what they earn in a month. It can only be surmised that they are in constant debt.

Table IV.17 Monthly Expenses of Sample AHs IR13

Gender of AH Head

Commune

Combined Monthly Expenditure

Total < $65

>$65 ~

$100

$101 ~ $200

$201 ~ $300

$301 ~ $500

> $500



35

Gender of AH Head

Commune

Combined Monthly Expenditure

Total < $65

>$65 ~

$100

$101 ~ $200

$201 ~ $300

$301 ~ $500

> $500

Sangkae 1 2 0 0 0 0 3






Amkpil 1 0 1 0 0 0 2


Krabau 0 0 1 1 0 1 3

Total 20 21 18 8 4 1 72

Female

Kampong Chak 1 1 1

0

3

Sangkae 1 2 1

0

4

Chrung Popel 0 1 0

0

1

Angk Prasrae 0 1 0

0

1

Kampong Trach 1 0 2

0

3

Amkpil 0 1 0

1

2

Total 3 6 4

1

14

E. Amenities of the sample AHs

1. 314D

79. Health and sanitation. Most of the 77 sample AHs in 314D have their own well for drinking (86.0%) and washing (83.0%). However, 40.0% (31 AHs) do not have a toilet in their homes. Relatedly, 64.0% of the AHs have no bathrooms. Moreover, most (88.0%) of the AHs burn or bury their refuse.

Table IV.18 Main Source of Potable Water of the AHs314D

Commune Source of potable water

Total Own well Public well Neighbor wells

Kandieng Reay 16 0 1 17

Prasout 8 1 3 12


Nhor 16 0 1 17

Ksetr 16 0 4 20

Thmei 7 0 0 7

Total 66 1 10 77

Table IV.19 Main Source of Water for Washing of the AHs 314D

Commune Water for washing/bathing

Total Own well Public well Neighbor wells


Prasout 8 1 3 12


Nhor 16 0 1 17

Ksetr 16 0 4 20

Thmei 7 0 0 7

Total 64 1 12 77

36

36

Table IV.20 Toilet Facilities Used by the AHs 314D

Commune Toilet facilities

Total Water-sealed Open pit None


Prasout 7 0 5 12


Nhor 10 1 6 17

Ksetr 10 0 10 20

Thmei 3 0 4 7

Total 44 2 31 77

Table IV.21 Bathing Facilities Used by the AHs 314D

Commune Bathing facilities

Total Own bathroom None

Kandieng Reay 7 10 17

Prasout 1 11 12

Preah Ponlea 1 3 4

Nhor 10 7 17

Ksetr 6 14 20

Thmei 3 4 7

Total 28 49 77

Table IV.22 Garbage Disposal Used by the AHs 314D

Commune

Garbage Disposal Used

Total Collected

Dumped by AH on wasteland

Burned/buried by AH


Prasout 0 2 10 12


Nhor 1 0 16 17

Ksetr 0 2 18 20

Thmei 0 1 6 7

Total 3 6 68 77

80. Power for lighting and fuel for cooking. Except for 1, the rest of the 77 sample AHs in 314D get electricity for lighting the public service provider. Wood is the most commonly used fuel for cooking among the AHs.

Table IV.23 Main Source of Power for Lighting 314D

Commune Main source of power for lighting

Total Rechargeable battery Public electricity


Prasout 1 11 12

Preah Ponlea 0 4 4

Nhor 0 17 17

Ksetr 0 20 20

Thmei 0 7 7

Total 1 76 77

37

Table IV.24 Main Source of Fuel for Cooking 314D

Commune Main source of Fuel for cooking

Total Wood Gas


Prasout 12 0 12

Preah Ponlea 3 1 4

Nhor 15 2 17

Ksetr 20 0 20

Thmei 6 1 7

Total 72 5 77

81. Household appliances and transportation. Television set is the most common household appliance, with 65 (84.0%) of the AHs owning one. Next is electric fan (75%), followed by hand phone (74%). Majority of the 77 sample AHs own a bicycle (84.0%) and a motorbike (81.0%).

Table IV.25 Household Appliances 314D

Commune

Household Appliances

TV Ref Radio/ casset

te Phone

DVD/ CD

Oven/ stove

Electric fan

Computer

Plows

Kandieng Reay 17 2 8 13 11 1 14 3 0

Prasout 8 2 6 9 3 0 6 2 1

Preah Ponlea 2 0 1 4 1 0 3 0 0

Nhor 13 0 3 10 9 2 13 1 2

Ksetr 19 1 9 15 13 0 15 1 1

Thmei 6 0 2 6 4 1 7 1 0

Total 65 5 29 57 41 4 58 8 4

Table IV.26 Ownership of Transportation 314D

Commune Transportation

Bicycle Motorbike None Car Truck Other*

Kandieng Reay 16 15 0 0 1 1

Prasout 10 7 3 1 1 1


Nhor 13 14 2 0 0 0

Ksetr 19 17 1 1 0 1

Thmei 5 6 0 0 0 0

Total 65 62 7 2 2 3

*Other: Koyon, Oxcarts

2. NR13

82. Health and sanitation. Majority of the 86 sample AHs in NR13 have their own well for drinking (58.0%) and washing (56.0%). However, 57.0% (49 AHs) do not have a toilet in their homes. Relatedly, 65.0% of the AHs have no bathrooms. Moreover, most (95.0%) of the AHs burn or bury their refuse.

38

38

Table IV.27 Main Source of Potable Water of the AHs NR13

Commune

Source of potable water

Total Own well Public well

Buy from retailers

Neighbor's Well

Sangkhor 5 0 0 3 8


Sangkae 6 0 0 1 7






Amkpil 4 0 0 0 4


Krabau 2 0 0 1 3

Total 50 6 2 28 86

Table IV.28 Main Source of Water for Washing of the AHs NR13

Commune

Water for washing/bathing

Total Own well Public well

Buy from retailers

Neighbor's Well

Sangkhor 5 0 0 3 8


Sangkae 6 0 0 1 7






Amkpil 3 1 0 0 4


Krabau 1 1 0 1 3

Total 48 7 2 29 86

Table IV.29 Toilet Facilities Used by the AHs NR13

Commune Toilet facilities

Total Water-sealed Open pit None Others

Sangkhor 3 0 3 2 8


Sangkae 4 0 3 0 7






Amkpil 3 0 1 0 4


Krabau 2 0 1 0 3

Total 30 5 49 2 86

39

Table IV.30 Bathing Facilities Used by the AHs NR13

Commune Bathing facilities

Total Own bathroom None

Sangkhor 3 5 8

Kampong Chak 6 8 14

Sangkae 4 3 7

Chrung Popel 1 7 8

Kampong Ampil 1 5 6

Angk Prasrae 3 4 7

Andoung Pou 0 7 7


Amkpil 3 1 4


Krabau 2 1 3

Total 30 56 86

Table IV.31 Garbage Disposal Used by the AHs NR13

Commune Disposal - Dumped by

AH on wasteland Disposal - Burned/

buried by AH Total

Sangkhor 0 8 8


Sangkae 1 6 7

Chrung Popel 0 8 8

Kampong Ampil 0 6 6

Angk Prasrae 1 6 7

Andoung Pou 0 7 7


Amkpil 0 4 4


Krabau 0 3 3

Total 4 82 86

83. Power for lighting and fuel for cooking. While majority (56.0%) of the 86 sample AHs get electricity from the public service provider, the rest of the sample AHs still use rechargeable car batteries for lighting and running electric appliances. All 86 sample AHs use wood for cooking, although some of them also use gas and electricity.

Table IV.32 Main Source of Power for Lighting NR13



Sangkhor 0 8 8


Sangkae 3 4 7

Chrung Popel 7 1 8

Kampong Ampil 6 0 6

Angk Prasrae 4 3 7

Andoung Pou 7 0 7


Amkpil 2 2 4


40

40



Krabau 0 3 3

Total 38 48 86

Table IV.33 Main Source of Fuel for Cooking NR13

Commune Main source of Fuel for Cooking

Total Wood Electricity Gas Cow Dung

Sangkhor 8 4 2 0 8


Sangkae 7 1 2 1 7






Amkpil 4 1 1 0 4


Krabau 3 2 3 0 3

Total 86 13 20 2 86

84. Household appliances and transportation. The hand phone is the most common household appliance, with 79.0% of the AHs owning one. Next is a television set (78.0%), followed by electric fan (43.0%). Majority of the 86 sample AHs own a bicycle (77.0%) and a motorbike (71.0%).

Table IV.34 Household Appliances NR13

Commune

Appliances

TV Radio/

cassette Phone

DVD/ CD

Oven/ stove

Electric fan

Computer Iron

Sangkhor 8 2 6 5 2 8 1 0

Kampong Chak 12 2 10 3 1 8 1 0

Sangkae 7 5 6 4 2 2 0 0

Chrung Popel 7 2 6 4 3 1 0 0

Kampong Ampil 6 0 6 2 3 4 0 0

Angk Prasrae 3 1 7 1 1 3 0 0

Andoung Pou 5 0 4 1 2 0 0 0

Kampong Trach 11 2 15 6 3 7 0 2

Amkpil 4 1 4 4 0 1 0 0

Andoung Trabaek 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0

Krabau 3 1 3 3 1 2 0 0

Total 67 16 68 34 18 37 2 2

Table IV.35 Ownership of Transportation NR13

Commune Means of Transportations

Bicycle Motorbike None Car Truck

Sangkhor 8 8 0 0 0


Sangkae 6 5 1 0 0



41

Commune Means of Transportations

Bicycle Motorbike None Car Truck




Amkpil 2 2 2 0 0


Krabau 1 3 2 0 0

Total 66 61 20 4 2

V. INFORMATION DISCLOSURE, CONSULTATION AND PARTICIPATION

85. Participation provides for the occasion and the process by which stakeholders influence and become co-responsible for development initiatives and decisions that affect them. Through participation, the needs and priorities of the local population are ventilated; the adverse social impacts of the Project, including the corresponding mitigating measures, are collectively identified; and the commitment and feeling of ownership over the Project is engendered among the APs.

A. Participatory activities in RP Planning and Implementation

86. The public, especially the AHs, the local governments and road users will be consulted and their opinions solicited, and will in fact participate in the preparation, updating, and implementation of the resettlement plan. Table below summarizes the roles and responsibilities of the Executing Agency, the local governments, and the AHs in the preparation, updating, and implementation of the resettlement plan.

Table V.1 Roles and Responsibilities of Key Stakeholders in the RP

Project Process Stage

Participatory Activities and Participants Responsible Institution

Preparation

Pre-feasibility/ Feasibility

Briefing of the provincial, district, commune, and village officials; PDWT; and stakeholders about the Project TA, the resettlement policy, and the activities of the consultants Conduct of IOL, census of APs, social impact assessment, and replacement cost study (RCS) Discussion with Resettlement Department Ministry of Economy and Finance (RD-MEF) and ESO about the proposed Project resettlement policy Initial disclosure meeting with AHs to discuss the results of the IOL and gather suggestions on how to minimize and mitigate impacts, and discuss about relocation options.

PMU3 and Consultants Consultants, assisted by commune/village officials Consultants Consultants, assisted by commune/village officials

42

42

Project Process Stage

Participatory Activities and Participants Responsible Institution

Drafting of the resettlement plan and project information leaflet

5 and submission to PMU3,

RD-MEF, and ADB for review and approval. Distribution of information leaflets to AHs, posting of summary resettlement plan at district and sub-district local government offices Posting on the ADB website

Consultants PMU3, IRC-WG and ESO ADB

Updating and Implementation

Drafting/Finalization

of Technical Design

Set-up resettlement coordinating committee Detailed Measurement Survey (DMS), updating unit costs (as necessary) Second disclosure meeting/consultation with APs to discuss results of DMS and discuss the resettlement policy, entitlements and relocation options Updating/revision of the resettlement plan and the project information leaflet Submission of updated resettlement plan and project information leaflet to RD-MEF and PMU3 for approval and endorsement to ADB Distribution of the updated information leaflets to the AHs and posting of summary updated resettlement plan at district and commune offices Implementation of Updated resettlement plan Monitoring of resettlement plan implementation

IRC through RD-MEF IRC-WG and PRSC-WG, assisted by Consultants IRC-WG and PRSC-WG, assisted by Consultants ESO, assisted by Consultants PMU3 IRC-WG and ESO, assisted by PRSC-WG IRC-WG and ESO with assistance of PRSC-WG ESO (internal) and RD-MEF (external) through external monitoring organization EMO)

B. Public consultations during RP preparation

87. The resettlement survey team conducted consultations in the affected districts prior to the IOL and SES activities. The agenda of the consultations included (a) explaining to local officials and residents what the TA was all about; (b) introducing the members of the survey team, the reasons for the survey and the schedule for the conduct of the same, including the policy on

5 The Project information leaflet, written in Khmer, contains the following brief information: (i) Project background,

specifically about the civil works to be done; (ii) results of the IOL; (iii) entitlements due to the AHs; (iv) bases for computing compensation for affected assets; (v) schedule of delivery of entitlements and displacement; (vi) grievance redress mechanism; and (vii) contact persons at PMU3. (See Appendix 5 for the draft leaflet).

43

cut-off date for eligibility to Project entitlements; and, (c) identifying the major project stakeholders in the districts and getting their views regarding the road improvement project, including their suggestions on how to avoid and minimize adverse impacts. A total of 199 local officials and residents participated in the consultations, 60 of whom were women. (See Appendix 4 for the highlights and list of participants to the pre-IOL consultations).

44

44

Table G-V.2 Dates of Pre-IOL Consultations

No Road Section Date of Meeting Location of

Meeting (District)

Number of Participants

Male Female Total

1 314D 20 May 2011 Svay Tep 12 01 13

2 314D 21 May 2011 Kampong Ro 19 01 20

3 NR13 21 May 2011 Rom Duol 27 16 43

4 NR13 22 May 2011 Romeas Haek 20 01 21

5 NR13 24 May 2011 Kamchay Mear 40 36 76

6 NR13 25 May 2011 Svay Rieng 21 05 26

Total Participants 139 60 199

88. Following the conclusion of the IOL and SES, the resettlement survey team returned to the affected districts to hold a second round of consultations, specifically with the AHs. The agenda of said consultations included (a) highlights of the results of IOL, such as information on the types and magnitude of impacts; (b) discussion of basic resettlement principles to be used in the project, such as compensation at replacement cost, public participation, and grievance redress; and, (c) finding out from the AHs what their views and suggestions are regarding compensation, allowances and assistance, relocation of structures, grievance redress, and participation. A total of 525 persons participated in the post-IOL consultations, 234 of whom were women. See Appendix 4 for the highlights and list of participants to the post-IOL consultations).

Table V.3 Dates of Post-IOL Consultations

No Road Section Date of Meeting Location of

Meeting (District)


Male Female Total

1 NR - 314D 20 June 2011 Svay Tep 29 49 78

2 NR - 314D 20 June 2011 Kampong Ro 30 13 43

3 NR - 13 21 June 2011 Rom Duol 33 27 60

4 NR - 13 21 June 2011 Romeas Haek 35 30 65

5 NR - 13 22 June 2011 Kamchay Mear 35 36 71

6 NR - 13 22 June 2011 Svay Rieng 130 79 209

Total Participants 292 234 525

C. Disclosure of the Resettlement Plan

89. The resettlement plan has been disclosed to affected households by way of public information meetings and dissemination of the public information brochure (attached as an annex to the resettlement plan). Translated copies of the resettlement plan (key isssues) have also been disseminated to each district and commune office within the project areas and are to be AHs accessible. The resettlement plan is also uploaded on the project website of the Ministry of Public Works and Transport as well as ADB’s website. D. Consultation and Information Disclosure during RP Implementation

90. Consultation with AHs will continue during resettlement plan updating up to implementation or resettlement. Particular attention will be given to the poor and other vulnerable AHs. All consultation and disclosure activities will be properly documented; minutes of

45

meetings, photos, and attendance sheets will be prepared and recorded.

91. Disclosure of the updated RP to AHs will be undertaken through each Commune Office in the project areas (where it will be made available for AH reading). MPWT (through the PMU3 and ESO) will disclose the final updated resettlement plan approved by the Government and the ADB and any revisions to the updated resettlement plan as a result of changes in scope or design layout. Key information in the updated resettlement plan to be disclosed to the commune office include (a) relocation and rehabilitation options, (b) entitlements, (c) grievance procedures, (d) schedule of delivery of assistance, and (e) displacement schedule. The information will be made publicly available at MPWT, district, and commune offices and will be provided to the AHs in the form of a project information leaflet (see Appendix 5 for the Project information leaflet). Social monitoring reports will also be made available to the AHs and will be uploaded on the ADB website.

VI. GRIEVANCE REDRESS MECHANISM

92. The objective the grievance redress provisions are to resolve complaints as quickly as possible and at the local level through a process of conciliation; and, if that is not possible, to provide clear and transparent procedures for appeal. AHs are entitled to lodge complaints regarding any aspect of the preparation and implementation of the RP. A well-defined grievance redress and resolution mechanism will be established to resolveAH grievances and complaints in a timely and satisfactory manner. All AHs will be made fully aware of their rights, and the detailed grievance redress procedures will be publicized through an effective public information campaign. The grievance redress process includes four stages:

a. First stage: AHs will present their complaints and grievances verbally or in writing to the village chief, commune chief or IRC and PRS working groups. The receiving agent will be obliged to provide immediate written confirmation of receiving the complaint. If after 15 days the aggrieved AH does not hear from the village and commune chiefs or the working groups, or if he/she is not satisfied with the decision taken in the first stage, the complaint may be brought to the District Office.

b. Second stage: The District Office has 15 days within which to resolve the complaint to the satisfaction of all concerned. If the complaint cannot be solved at this stage, the District Office will bring the case to the Provincial Grievance Redress Committee.

c. Third stage: The Provincial Grievance Redress Committee meets with the aggrieved party and tries to resolve the situation. The Committee may ask for a review of the DMS by the external monitor (IMO). Within 30 days of the submission of the grievance, the Committee must make a written decision and submit copies to the MOWRAM, PDOWRAM, PDRD, EMA, PRS/IRC and the AH.

Final stage: If the aggrieved AH does not hear from the Provincial Grievance Redress Committee or is not satisfied, he/she will bring the case to Provincial Court. This is the final stage for adjudicating complaints. The Court will make a written decision and submit copies to the MOWRAM, PDOWRAM, EMA, PRS/IRC and the AH. If any party is still unsatisfied with the Provincial Court judgment, he/she can bring the case to a higher-level court.

46

46

VII. LEGAL AND POLICY FRAMEWORK

92. The legal and policy framework for addressing the adverse social impacts of the Project is provided by relevant policies and laws of the Royal Government of Cambodia and of the ADB.

A. Relevant Laws

1. 1993 Constitution

93. The 1993 Constitution of Cambodia sets two basic principles for land acquisition. The first is Article 44 which states that the “right to confiscate properties from any person shall be exercised only in the public interest as provided by law and shall require fair and just compensation in advance” (Article 44). The second principle is Article 20 which stipulates that “nobody shall be forced to transfer his or her ownership, if forcing is not necessary in the public interest and (if) no proper and just indemnity has been paid to the owner”. These two principles are also adhered to in almost all countries.

94. Articles 73 and 74 of the Constitution provide for special consideration and support to vulnerable people including mothers and children, the disabled and families of combatants who sacrificed their lives for the nation. Indigenous minorities however are not explicitly included in these two articles but included in the Land Law.

2. Land Law (2001)

95. The 2001 Land Law governs land and property rights in Cambodia. Based on the provisions of the 1993 Constitution, it defines the regime of ownership of immovable properties, such as land, trees and fixed structures.

96. The rights and responsibilities of the Government with respect to eminent domain are specified in the Land Law. The Government can acquire private land for public purposes but has to pay a fair and just compensation in advance of the land acquisition. The Land Law, Article 5, states that “No person may be deprived of his ownership, unless it is in the public interest. An ownership deprivation shall be carried out in accordance with the forms and procedures provided by law and regulations and after the payment of fair and just compensation in advance.”

97. Other provisions of the Land Law that are relevant to land acquisition, compensation and resettlement include:

a. Legal possession as defined by the Law is the sole basis for ownership, and all transfers or changes of rights of ownership shall be carried out in accordance with the required general rules for sale, succession, exchange and gift or by court decision. (Article 6)

b. Any regime of ownership of immovable property prior to 1979 shall not be recognized. (Article 7)

c. Only persons or legal entities of Khmer nationality are entitled to own land in Cambodia; or to buy or sell land. (Articles 8, 66)

d. State public land includes, among other categories, any property a) that has a natural origin, such as forests, courses and banks of navigable and floatable rivers or natural lakes; b) that is made available for public use such as roads, tracks, oxcart ways,

47

pathways, gardens, public parks and reserved land; or, c) that is allocated to render a public service, such as public schools, public hospitals or administrative buildings. (Article 15)

e. Persons that illegally occupy, possess or claim title to State public land cannot claim any compensation. This includes land established by the Government as public rights-of-way for roads and railways. Moreover, failure to vacate illegally occupied land in a timely manner is subject to fines and/or imprisonment. (Article 19)

f. Ownership of the lands is granted by the State to indigenous communities6 as collective ownership, including all the rights and protections enjoyed by private owners. The exercise of collective ownership rights are the responsibility of the traditional authorities and decision-making mechanisms of the indigenous community, according to their customs and subject to laws such as the law on environmental protection. (Article 26)

g. No authority outside the community may acquire any rights to immovable properties belonging to an indigenous community. (Article 28)

h. Persons with legally valid possession of land for five years (at the time the law came into effect) are allowed to be registered as the owner of the land (Article 30). Persons who (at the time the law came into effect) held legal possession but had not yet completed the five years were allowed to remain in possession until they were eligible to be registered as the owner. (Article 31)

i. However, temporary possession claims made by persons after the law comes into effect will not be recognized, rescinding a previous right under the 1992 Land Law for acquiring land by taking possession. (Articles 29, 34)

j. Landless people may apply for land for residential and subsistence farming purposes at no cost, as part of a social land concessions scheme. The concessionaire may obtain ownership of this land after fulfilling conditions set out in a separate Sub-Decree on Social Land Concessions. (Articles 50, 51)

k. Acquisition of land through gifts is permitted with the following conditions: (i) the gift of immovable property is only effective if it is made in writing and registered with the Cadastral Registry Unit; (ii) once accepted, gifts of immovable property are irrevocable; and, (iii) the donor may retain the right of usufruct in the property, and the right of use and habitation of an immovable property. (Articles 80-84)

3. Other relevant laws and edicts

98. In addition to the Land Law, there are also other laws, decrees, sub-decrees and other regulations and guidelines that may be relevant to the resettlement in design and implementation

6As per Article 23 of the Land Law, “An indigenous community is a group of people that resides in

Cambodia whose members manifest ethnic, social, cultural and economic unity and who practice a traditional lifestyle, and who cultivate the lands in their possession according to the customary rules of collective use”

48

48

of subprojects under the Project. The Sub-Decree on Social Concessions, enforced on 19 March 2003, provides legal basis for allocations of State private land for purposes of the alleviation of landlessness and poverty, including the replacement of land lost in the context of involuntary resettlement.

99. The private ownership of land was re-established in 1989, and confirmed in the 2001 Land Law (Article4). Cambodians are able to register the land they occupy with the local Cadastral Administration Office, whereupon a certificate of land title is granted. Issuing land titles is a lengthy process and most offices have a major backlog of applications. People are given a receipt and until the official title deed is issued, this receipt is accepted as title for land purpose or sale.

100. The present legal status of land use in Cambodia can be classified as follows:

a. Privately owned land with title: The owner has official title to land, and both owner and the Cadastral Administration Office have a copy of the deed.

b. Privately owned land without title: The owner has make application for title to land, and is waiting for the issuance of a title deed. The Cadastral Administration Office recognizes the owner.

c. Land use rights certified by the Government: In this case, a receipt for long-term land use has been issued. This land use right is recognized by the Cadastral Administration Office.

d. Lease land: The Government or private owners lease the land, usually for a short period. There is provision for the owner to reclaim land if it is needed for development.

e. Non-legal occupation: The user has no land use rights to State land that he occupies or uses. The Cadastral Administration Office does not recognize the use of this land.

100. Prakas No. 6, entitled “Measures to Crack Down on Anarchic Land Grabbing and Encroachments”, sets a ROW of 50 m for NR 2, 3, 6, and 7, and a ROW of 60 m for NR 1, 4, 5, 11, 22, 64, and 78. Exceptions are made for urban areas traversed by these national roads, where the ROW can be reduced, subject to the decision of the Government. In support of this Prakas, the Ministry of Economy and Finance (MEF) on 6 April 2000 issued Decree No. 961 prohibiting compensation for structures and other assets located in the road ROW.

101. Prakas No. 6 must have been prompted by the influx of people inside the road ROW following the ouster from power of the Khmer Rouge in 1979 after a reign of four years. During that short period, private property was abolished and all land records destroyed. The years that followed after 1979 until the restoration of private property in 1989 were very disorderly, often chaotic, exacerbated by more armed conflicts. Returning people who were forced to do manual farm labor during the Khmer Regime occupied any vacant or empty property they could find along the road and in town centers. To make the re-occupation of abandoned properties and the distribution of land more systematic, the post-1979 government introduced usufruct rights, organizing families in rural areas into groups that collectively owned land and assets. Each group of families had a head, and land was distributed to individual families according to fertility.

4. Expropriation Law

101. The Expropriation Law, passed by the National Assembly on 29 December 2009 and promulgated by the King on 04 February 2010, contains 8 Chapters with 39 Articles. It provides

49

clear procedures on acquiring private properties for national and public interests. Key Articles of the Law are listed below.

a. Article 2: the law has the following purposes: (i) ensure reasonable and just deprivation of a legal right to ownership of private property; (ii) ensure payment of reasonable and just prior compensation; (iii) serve the public and national interests; and (iv) development of public physical infrastructure. Article 7:

b. Only the State may carry out an expropriation for use in the public and national interests.

c. Article 8: the State shall accept the purchase of part of the real property left over from an expropriation at a reasonable and just price at the request of the owner of and/or the holder of right in the expropriated real property who is unable to live near the expropriated scheme or to build a residence or conduct any business.

d. Article 12: an expropriation committee shall be established and headed by a representative from the Ministry of Economy and Finance and composed of representatives from relevant ministries and institutions. The organization and functioning of the expropriation committee shall be determined by a sub-decree.

e. Article 22: an amount of compensation to be paid to the owner of and/or holder of rights in the real property shall be based on the market value of the real property or the alternative value as of the date of the issuance of the Prakas on the expropriation scheme. The market value or the alternative value shall be determined by an independent commission or agent appointed by the expropriation committee.

B. ADB Policies

102. The objectives of the ADB Safeguard Policy Statement (2009) are (a) to avoid impacts on people and the environment, where possible; (b) where avoidance is not possible, minimize, mitigate, or compensate for adverse project impacts on the environment and the affected people; and (c) help the executing agency strengthen its safeguard system. Towards this end, ADB resettlement policy includes the following principles:

a. Screen the project early on to identify past, present, and future involuntary resettlement impacts and risks. Determine the scope of resettlement planning through a survey and/or census of affected persons, including a gender analysis, specifically related to resettlement impacts and risks.

b. Improve, or at least restore, the livelihoods of all affected persons through (i) land-based resettlement strategies when affected livelihoods are land based where possible or cash compensation at replacement value for land when the loss of land does not undermine livelihoods, (ii) prompt replacement of assets with access to assets of equal or higher value, (iii) prompt compensation at full replacement cost for assets that cannot be restored, and (iv) additional revenues and services through benefit sharing schemes where possible.

c. Provide physically and economically affected persons with needed assistance, including the following: (i) if there is relocation, secured tenure to relocation land, better housing at resettlement sites with comparable access to employment and production opportunities, integration of resettled persons economically and socially into their host communities, and extension of project benefits to host communities; (ii)

50

50

transitional support and development assistance, such as land development, credit facilities, training, or employment opportunities; and (iii) civic infrastructure and community services, as required.

d. Improve the standards of living of the affected poor and other vulnerable groups, including women, to at least national minimum standards. In rural areas provide them with legal and affordable access to land and resources, and in urban areas provide them with appropriate income sources and legal and affordable access to adequate housing.

e. Develop procedures in a transparent, consistent, and equitable manner if land acquisition is through negotiated settlement.

f. Ensure that affected persons without titles to land or any recognizable legal rights to land are eligible for resettlement assistance and compensation for loss of non-land assets.

g. Prepare a resettlement plan elaborating on affected persons’ entitlements, the income and livelihood restoration strategy, institutional arrangements, monitoring and reporting framework, budget, and time-bound implementation schedule.

h. Prepare a resettlement plan elaborating on affected persons’ entitlements, the income and livelihood restoration strategy, institutional arrangements, monitoring and reporting framework, budget, and time-bound implementation schedule.

i. Disclose a draft resettlement plan, including documentation of the consultation process in a timely manner, before project appraisal, in an acceptable place and a form and language(s) understandable to affected persons and other stakeholders. Disclose the final resettlement plan and its updates to affected persons and other stakeholders.

j. Conceive and execute involuntary resettlement as part of a development project or program. Include the full costs of resettlement in the presentation of project’s cost and benefits. For a project with significant involuntary resettlement impacts, consider implementing the involuntary resettlement component of the project as a stand-alone operation.

k. Pay compensation and provide other resettlement entitlements before physical or economic displacement. Implement the resettlement plan under close supervision throughout project implementation.

l. Monitor and assess resettlement outcomes, their impacts on the standards of living of affected persons, and whether the objectives of the resettlement plan have been achieved by taking into account the baseline conditions and the results of resettlement monitoring. Disclose monitoring reports.

103. The objective of ADB Policy on Indigenous Peoplesas set out in the Safeguard Policy Statement (2009) is to design and implement projects in a way that fosters full respect for Indigenous Peoples’ identity, dignity, human rights, livelihood systems, and cultural uniqueness as defined by the Indigenous Peoples themselves so that they (i) receive culturally appropriate

51

social and economic benefits, (ii) do not suffer adverse impacts as a result of projects, and (iii) can participate actively in projects that affect them.

104. The ADB Policy on Gender and Development (2006) adopts gender mainstreaming as a key strategy for promoting gender equity, and for ensuring that women participate in and that their needs are explicitly addressed in the decision-making process for development activities. For projects that have the potential to have substantial gender impacts, a gender plan is prepared to identify strategies to address gender concerns and the involvement of women in the design, implementation and monitoring of the project.

C. Coping with the Resettlement Policies of Funding Agencies

105. In dealing with ODA funded projects, the Government has adapted on a project-by-project basis to the resettlement policies of donor agencies. Thus, starting in 1999 with the ADB-assisted Phnom Penh to Ho Chi Minh City Highway Improvement Project (Loan 1659-CAM), projects supported by such funding agencies are governed by the resettlement policies of these agencies and relevant laws and government regulations not consistent with the same are waived.

106. Table below summarizes how the resettlement policy ADB is applied in Cambodia.

52

52

Table VII.1Resettlement Policy and Its Application in Cambodia

ADB Policy ADB Policy Application in Cambodia \

Resettlement Work

Involuntary Resettlement Policy is applied to all development projects resulting in (i) loss of productive assets, including land, income and livelihood; (ii) lost of housing, possibly entire community structure, systems, and service; (iii) loss of other assets; loss of community resources, habitat, cultural sites, and goods.

ADB’s Involuntary Resettlement Policy is being applied to ADB-financed projects in Cambodia.

Involuntary resettlement should be avoided where feasible.

Involuntary resettlement has been avoided as much as possible through consideration of alternative project locations and narrowing the irrigation ROWs to a designated corridor of impact (COI) and realigning the COI.

Where population displacement is unavoidable, all viable project options should be explored to minimize displacement.

Various project options (e.g. bypass road design) have been explored to minimize displacement to as few households as possible.

People unavoidably affected should be compensated and assisted so that their economic and social future would be generally as favorable as it would have been in the absence of the project.

Land-for-land is offered in some cases, though not all affected persons who lost land have been allocated a relocation site. Cash compensation for affected house, trees and other structures and privately owned land. Additional assistance is given to female headed, disabled, elderly, and very poor households, and cost of removal and transport of salvage materials. Some rehabilitation assistance has been given but not yet specified to restore to pre-project level. Future job opportunities at relocation sites have not generally been considered, with some exceptions. Compensation paid does not ensure income restoration and living standards, with a few exceptions.

Existing social and cultural institutions of re-settlers and their hosts should be supported and used to the greatest extent possible, and re-settlers should be integrated economically and socially into host communities.

The existing social and economic situations of the affected persons and their hosts have, in some cases, been supported, but not consistently applied.

The full cost of resettlement and compensation should be included in the presentation of project costs and benefits.

Compensation costs are budgeted in projects funded by the Banks. It is not possible to determine if this is consistently applied in non-bank-funded projects.

The absence of a formal legal title to land by some affected groups should not be a bar to compensation; particular attention should be paid to households headed by women and other vulnerable groups,, and appropriate assistance provided to help improve their status.

Absence of legal title to land has not been a determining factor in compensation payments, as long as the AHs are outside of the ROW and other state land. It is against the law to compensate for ROW land; however, such compensation has been paid on some ADB-financed projects as agricultural land use assistance

7.

7 Land use assistance is provided for productive land in the ROW.

53

VIII. ENTITLEMENTS, ASSISTANCE AND BENEFITS

107. The Project resettlement policy has been developed taking into account the types, characteristics, and severity of Project impacts on assets and living conditions of the affected population, guided by the Constitution of the Royal Government of Cambodia, prevailing legal and government procedures and policies, not to mention resettlement policies adopted by the government for specific development projects funded by the ADB.

A. Objectives

108. The paramount objective of the Project Resettlement Policy is to ensure that AHs are not worse off because of the Project. The Project should provide an opportunity for the local population to derive benefits from it, and it should likewise serve as an occasion for the local population to participate in its planning and implementation, thereby engendering a sense of ownership over the same. B. Key Principles

109. Cognizant of the aforementioned, the Royal Government of Cambodia commits itself to the following principles in the implementation of the Project road:

a. Acquisition of land and other assets, and resettlement of people will be avoided or minimized as much as possible by identifying possible alternative project designs and appropriate social, economic, operational and engineering solutions that have the least impact on the population.

b. No land acquisition or site clearing will be done inside the ROW in anticipation or ahead of it being considered for implementation under the Project. Relatedly, no land acquisition or site clearing will be done inside the ROW until and after the RP has been updated and approved both by Royal Government of Cambodia and the ADB, and until and after all entitlements due to the AHs as provided for in this resettlement policy have been delivered.

c. AHs will be eligible for compensation and rehabilitation assistance, irrespective of tenure status, social or economic standing and any such factors that may discriminate against achievement of the Project resettlement objective. Lack of legal rights to lost assets or adversely affected tenure status and social or economic status will not bar the AHs from entitlements to such compensation for non-land assets and rehabilitation measures or resettlement objectives.

d. AHs residing, working, doing business and/or cultivating land within the Project impacted areas during the conduct of the IOL, to be validated or updated during the detailed measurement survey (DMS), are entitled to be compensated for their lost assets, incomes and businesses at replacement cost prevailing at the time of compensation, and, depending on the severity of impact on their livelihood and income capacity, will be provided with rehabilitation measures to improve or restore their pre-Project living standards, income-earning capacity and production levels.

e. There will be no deductions in compensation payments for land, structures or other affected assets for salvage value, depreciation, taxes, stamp duties, fees or other payments.

54

54

f. If ownership over any affected asset is under dispute, the compensation for the same will be held in a court designated bank until its lawful owner is decided by competent legal authorities.

g. AHs that lose only part of their physical assets will not be left with a portion that will be inadequate to sustain their current standard of living. The minimum size of remaining land and structures will be agreed between the MPWT, the Inter-Ministerial Resettlement Committee (IRC), and ADB during the updating of the RP and prior to the conduct of the detailed measurement survey (DMS).

h. Shop owners will be assisted in gradually dismantling and setting up their shops in a new location to be agreed with the Provincial Resettlement Sub-committee-Working Group (PRSC-WG) in the residual area of the ROW and in a way that will allow them to gradually phase out their operation in their present location place and gradually begin their operation in their new place. Under this arrangement, disruption in the operation of shop owners will be minimized, thereby averting severe impact on the AHs’ livelihood.

i. People presently cultivating plots inside the ROW will be allowed to continue cultivating the residual area of their cultivated plots in the ROW, if there is any. If during RP updating it is determined that the loss of these farmers is equivalent to 10% or more of their total livelihood or income from various sources, the PRSC-WG will assist in finding an affordable replacement land with similar productive attributes for the farmers to lease.

j. Temporarily affected land and communal infrastructure will be restored to pre-project conditions.

k. Project stakeholders, especially AHs, will be consulted and given the opportunity to participate in matters that will have adverse impacts on their lives during the design, implementation and operation of the Project.

l. Any acquisition of, or restriction on access to, resources owned or managed by the AHs as a common property, e.g., communal forest, communal farm, will be mitigated by arrangements that will ensure access of those AHs to equivalent resources on a continuing basis. Similarly, temporarily affected land and communal infrastructure will be restored to pre-Project conditions.

m. Plans for the acquisition of land and other assets will be carried out in consultation with the AHs who will receive prior information of the compensation, relocation and other assistance available to them.

n. There shall be an effective mechanism for hearing and resolving grievances during the planning, updating and implementation of the RP.

o. Existing cultural and religious practices shall be respected and, to the extent possible, preserved.

p. Special measures will be incorporated in the RP to protect socially and economically vulnerable groups who face greater risk of further hardship. These vulnerable groups include women-headed households, households headed by persons with disabilities, landless households, children and elderly people without support structures, and people living below poverty line. Appropriate assistance will be provided to help AHs belonging to any of these vulnerable groups improve their socio-economic status.

q. Adequate resources will be identified and committed during the preparation of the RP. This includes sufficient budgetary support that is fully committed and made available

55

to cover resettlement costs within the agreed implementation period; and, adequate human resources for supervision, liaison and monitoring of land acquisition, resettlement and rehabilitation activities.

r. Appropriate reporting, monitoring and evaluation mechanisms will be identified and set in place as part of the resettlement management system.

s. The RP or its summary will be translated in Khmer and placed in district and commune offices for the information of the AHs as well as other interested groups.

t. Civil works contractors will not be issued notice of possession or notice to proceed (NTP) for any section or segment of the Project roads until (i) compensation has been satisfactorily completed for that area; (ii) agreed rehabilitation measures are in place; and (iii) the area is free from all encumbrances. The schedule of the start of civil works in any section or segment of the Project road will be coordinated and planned with the PRSC-WG whose members include male and women representatives of the AHs.

C. Entitlements

110. For purposes of this resettlement plan (RP), the cut-off date coincides with the date the IOL was held which was preceded by a public meeting in the districts during which MPWT representatives and TA consultants briefed local officials and residents about the project, the compensation policy and the need to conduct the IOL, including the policy regarding cut-off date. The IOL in PR 314D and NR13 was carried out in on 20 May 2011 – 2 June 2011. The list of AHs will be updated and/or validated during the DMS following approval by project authorities of the project feasibility study. The Inter-ministerial Resettlement Committee (IRC), the government body that is tasked to spearhead the conduct of the DMS and the implementation of the RP, will confirm the final date of the cut-off-date.

111. Based on the impacts identified during the IOL, the corresponding entitlements to be provided to the AHs are presented in the entitlement matrix below. It should be noted that these entitlements may be enhanced, as necessary, following the conduct of the DMS during RP in consultation with the AHs to ensure that their livelihoods are restored, if not improved

Table VIII.1 Entitlement Matrix

Type of Loss/Impacts

Application Eligible Persons

Entitlements

Loss of Land (all kinds) OUTSIDE the ROW

Partial loss;

i.e., only a portion of the land of the AH is acquired by the Project and the residual un-affected is STILL VIABLE

for continued use.

3 AHs (at CBF)

All AHs with recognized proof of ownership who will be affected by the expansion of the CBF at Prey Var and the construction of by-pass road in Chaung Moung commune (PR150B)

AHs to be notified at least 3 months in advance of

the start of civil works in the locality.

For the affected portion of the land: cash compensation at replacement cost (based on findings of replacement cost study or RCS; in case there is no active market in the locality, based on productive capacity or attributes; without deduction for taxes and transaction costs)

To the extent possible, AHs will be allowed to harvest their annual and perennial crops and timber

products prior to construction.

If AH belongs to any of the vulnerable groups, see

entitlements for vulnerable AHs below.

Entire land is lost; i.e., the

All AHs with recognized



56

56



Entitlements

whole land is affected by the Project, or the residual un-affected is NO LONGER VIABLE for

continued use and, therefore, the entire land will be acquired by the Project.

1 AH (at CBF)

proof of ownership who will be affected by the expansion of the CBF at Prey Vor

For the entire land: cash compensation at replacement cost (based on findings of

replacement cost study or RCS and updated to reflect prevailing market rates at the time of compensation; in case there is no active market in the locality, based on productive capacity or attributes; without deduction for taxes and transaction costs)

To the extent possible AHs will be allowed to harvest their annual and perennial crops and timber

products prior to construction.

If during RP updating, farmer AHs are found to be severely affected (i.e., the loss is equivalent to 10%

or more of their total income capacity), the AH will be provided (i) rehabilitation assistancethrough an

income restoration program (IRP) that will be planned by the Project with the active participation of the AHs; and (ii) one time assistance allowance of

$200 per household.



Loss of use of Productive Land INSIDE the ROW

Partial loss;

i.e., only a portion of the land cultivated by the AH within the COI is affected. (Identities of the AHs will be determined during DMS and RP updating)

All AHs utilizing ROW land for productive use



To the extent possible AHs will be allowed to harvest their crops prior to construction.

AHs will be tolerated to cultivate the residual area

of the ROW.

For the affected portion, cash assistance for loss of land use equivalent to $0.50/m2.

If during RP updating, said farmers are found to be severely affected (i.e., the loss is equivalent to 10%

or more of their total income capacity), the AH will (i) be assisted by the PRSC in finding affordable replacement land with similar productive attributes for these farmers to lease; (ii) be provided rehabilitation assistance through an income

restoration program (IRP) that will be planned by the Project with the active participation of the AHs; and (iii) one time assistance allowance of $200 per

household.



House, House-cum-store; Independent Shops

Partial loss of house, house-cum-store; independent shop; i.e., only

a portion of the main structure of the house, house-and-store, or shop is affected and the remaining unaffected portion is STILL

Owners with or without acceptable proof of ownership over the land; with or without building permit

AHs to be notified at least3 months in advance of


For the affected portion, cash compensation at replacement cost (i.e., present cost of construction

materials in the locality, plus cost of labor and repair [i.e., 20% of the cost of labor and materials] of the unaffected portion). AHs to get cash compensation at least 3 months ahead of civil works in the locality to provide them sufficient time to gradually re-organize the house and/or shop, thereby

avoiding any disruption in the livelihood of the same.



Renters of said structures



57



Entitlements

VIABLE for use. No other entitlements if not relocating and if

business operation is not disrupted.

Entire house, house-cum-store, store is lost ;i.e., entire

main structure is affected, or the unaffected portion of the main structure is NO LONGER VIABLE for

continued use.

Owners with or without acceptable proof of ownership over the land; with or without building permit



Cash compensation at replacement cost for the

entire structure (i.e., present cost of construction materials and labor in the locality). AHs to get cash compensation at least 3 months ahead of civil works in the locality to provide them sufficient time to gradually re-organize the house and/or shop,

thereby avoiding any disruption in the livelihood of the same.

One time assistance allowance per household.as

follows: Houses and regular shops (i.e., can be closed

with four walls) that will move back in residual area of the ROW: (i) $100 for

affected house; and (ii) $33 for the affected regular store).

Houses and regular shops that will relocate outside the ROW: (i) $200 for affected house;

and (ii) $100 for the affected regular store).

Transportation (moving) allowance as follows:

Shops and stalls made of light and temporary materials: $20

Regular shops and houses moving into the residual area of the ROW: $40

Regular shops and houses relocating within the same village outside of the ROW: $60

Houses relocating in another village outside of the ROW: $70

Income loss allowance for AHs of entirely affected house-and-stores and independent shops:

Unregistered: Businesses owners who cannot show any tax receipt and cannot otherwise confirm income amount will be provided one-time cash assistance of $50

Cash compensation equivalent to the daily net income (as reflected in tax receipts) multiplied by the days of business disruption

If landless, to be provided free of charge with substitute plot with an area of approximately 105 m² outside of the ROW and in a location acceptable

to the AH, with secure tenure under the land concession law, accessible, with or close to source of potable water, and with latrine.



Renters of entirely affected house and house-and-store



Transportation (moving) allowance of $50

One time assistance allowance of $33 per

household. for relocating tenants of affected regular shop and house.

Rental allowance equivalent to 2 months of rent of a

similar building in the locality.

58

58



Entitlements



Miscellaneous/other structures (porch, extended eaves, spirit house, fence, etc.)

Loss of, or damage to, assets

Owners of the structures with or without acceptable proof of ownership over the land; with or without building permit



Cash compensation at replacement cost for the

affected assets (i.e., present cost of construction materials and labor in the locality).

Crops and trees Loss of, or damage to, assets

Owners regardless of tenure status



To the extent possible, AHs will be allowed to harvest their annual and perennial crops prior to

construction.

Perennial and timber trees will be compensated in cash as per replacement cost study.

Public Facilities (Government-owned structures)

Loss of, or damage to, assets

Institutions that own the affected assets

Institution to be notified at least 3 months in advance of the start of civil works in the locality.

To be reconstructed, restored and/or relocated by the civil works contractor

Higher risks of hardship due to project impacts

Loss of house and shops, paddy land within the ROW

Vulnerable Groups: AHs

belonging to one or more of the following vulnerable groups: (i) living below the poverty line; (ii) AHs headed by women and AHs headed by the elderly with no social support; and (iii) households that are headed by persons with disabilities;

One time assistance allowance of $100 per

household.

Participate in income restoration program

Impacts during Construction

Contractors will be responsible for paying rental in cash for land outside the ROW which will be not less than the net income that would have been derived from the affected property during disruption.

Restoration of land within 3 months after use.

Non-land assets within the residual area of the ROW and/or outside of the ROW that are adversely impacted by construction activities will be compensated at replacement cost by the civil works contractor.

59

D. Strategy to address gender issues

112. The Project includes the following specific actions to address gender issues in the Project:

a. A male representative and a female representative of the AHs in a commune will seat in the district RSC-WG.

b. In conducting the DMS, consultations on resettlement activities and relocation options, both women and men will participate in the discussions.

c. Gender issues will be included in training on the Project resettlement policy that will be provided to concerned personnel of the PMU3, the ESO of MPWT, and the RSC-WGs.

d. Special measures will be taken in the relocation of elderly, disabled and women-headed households in terms of location of new sites for affected shops and houses.

e. Disaggregated monitoring indicators by gender will be developed for monitoring social benefits, economic opportunities, livelihood, and resettlement activities.

E. Strategy to assist vulnerable households

113. As discusses in the preceding sections, on top of the compensation and applicable allowance that vulnerable AHs will receive for their losses as provided in the entitlement matrix, vulnerable AH, AHs are entitled to participate in the income restoration that will be designed with their active involvement.

114. The project will foster full participation of vulnerable households in meaningful consultations so that they are able to participate in decisions which affect them.

F. Unforeseen Impacts

115. If during the DMS, additional adverse social impacts are identified and/or additional AHs are found, these persons and households are entitled to receive Project entitlements as the others on condition that it can be ascertained that they have actually been in the Project ROW even before 20-15 May 2011 in 314D and on 26 May to 2 June 2011 in NR13, the cut-off date for eligibility8. New AHs that will emerge due to changes in Project design or alignment prior to or even during construction works are likewise entitled to the same entitlements as those of the other AHs.

IX. RELOCATION OF HOUSING AND SETTLEMENTS

A. Relocation Strategy

116. The PRSC-WG will endeavor to ensure minimal disruption in the livelihood activities of the owners of the 103 entirely affected independent shops (i.e., 45 in 314D, 1 in the CBF, and 57 in NR13); the 74 partially affected independent shops (i.e., 17 in 314D and 57 in NR13); the 3 entirely affected house-and-stores (i.e., 2 in 314D and 1 at the CBF); and 10 partially-affected

8To be confirmed by the IRC.

60

60

house-and-stores (i.e., 7 in 314D and 3 in NR13). Through the PRSC-WG the shop owners will be informed regarding the schedule of civil works in a specific section of 314D and NR13 at least 3 months in advance.

117. All AHs affected by the entire loss of their houses and shops can move behind the residual area of the ROW. If it is not possible for the AH to rebuild behind where their affected structures presently stand, the PRSC-WG, in consultation and with the active participation of the AHs, will look for a place elsewhere in the ROW outside of the COI. The shifting of entirely affected shops will be done in a way that will allow the AHs to gradually phase out their operation in their present location and gradually begin their operation in their new place. Under this arrangement, the shop owners, whose business caters greatly to road users, will not experience total disruption in their operation.

B. Temporary Impacts

118. To ensure that temporary impacts during construction will be avoided, if not minimized, the contract for civil works will include the following provisions: (a) contractor to pay rent for any land required for construction work space outside the ROW; (b) to the extent possible, only idle land will be used as construction work space to avoid disruption to households and business establishments; and (c) temporary use of land will be restored or improved to its pre-Project condition. The PMU3, assisted by the PRSC, will review any written agreement with the AHs, payment records, and disbursement of payment to ensure proper monitoring and compliance with the Project resettlement policy. Said monitoring will be included in the quarterly progress reports of the PMU3 to be submitted to MPWT and the ADB.

X. INCOME RESTORATION AND REHABILITATION

A. General Provisions

119. An income restoration program (IRP) will be planned and developed with the assistance of community development specialists to be hired by IRC for the purpose. While those who are entitled to participate in program include AHs affected by the loss of entire shops, it is not expected that the Project will severely disrupt the business operation of shop owners. Therefore, the focus of the IRP is more on helping the poor and other vulnerable AHs improve their situation. For this purpose, the IRP will be designed during the updating of the RP and will be implemented in parallel with the implementation of the RP with the active involvement of the participating AHs.

120. The IRP will be geared towards helping the participating AHs produce for their basic needs within one years. This will be accomplished by helping them find ways to (a) maximize the use of their remaining lands for food production (rice and vegetables), (b) engage in fast-return and short-cycle backyard livestock production, and (c) find work in urban areas. The IRP strategy puts emphasis on food production, aware of the fact that the AHs are mostly, if not all, farmers and that production in the project area is basically for home consumption. Farm production will be augmented by small-scale, short-cycle livestock production on the remaining lands of the AHs. This activity is intended to provide both food and cash to the AHs. It is also intended to provide livelihood to members of the AHs who are no longer able to seek employment in factories and shops in urban areas, such as the elderly. In addition to the two activities, members of the AHs that are within the working age (15 to 60 years old) will be provided training, as needed, and referred to establishments in need of workers. This component of the strategy is also intended to bring in cash for the other basic needs of the AHs.

61

121. For purposes of budgeting, and assuming that there is not double counting9, a total of 536 AHs are entitled to participate in the IRP. A provisional sum is allocated in the resettlement budget to finance the various components of the IRP, notably, training in food production, seed capital for home-based livestock and food production, and training for job placement. The allocated amount for each AH will not be given to the household but will be used as a block fund to support the various components of the program. The specific implementation mechanism for the use of the IRP funds will be spelled out in the planning of the program. Therefore, the block fund that will be put up for the 536 AHs is $160,800.

B. Loss of productive land

1. Land within the Right of Way

122. Occupied land in the ROW will not be compensated. However, AHs affected by the loss of ROW land used for agriculture will be provided cash assistance for permanent loss of land use at $0.50per m2 as explained in the section on Project Resettlement Policy.

Table X.1 Loss of Land Use within Road Right of Way

Road Section Quantity (m2)

314D 12,004.0

NR13 44,681.3

Total 55,685.3

2. Privately Owned Land

123. Privately owned land to be acquired in the expansion and development of the CBF at Prey Var (314D) will be compensated at prevailing market rates.

Table X.2 Acquired Private Land at CBF

Types of Land Area (m2)

Farmland 12,135.12

Grazing land 10,560.0

Total 24,945.72

C. Loss of Business Income

124. Owners of unregistered independent shops and house-and-stores that are entirely affected are each entitled to receive one-time cash assistance (allowance) of $50 for loss of income. None of the owners of entirely affected shops claimed to be registered.10 In all, $2,350 is allocated for 314D for income loss allowance, while $100 is allocated for the CBF, and $2,850 for NR13.

9 Some of the AHs in the vulnerable groups could also be among those losing entire houses and shops.

10If during the DMS, registered entirely affected shops are found, owners of the same will be provided

income loss allowance equivalent to the daily net income (as reflected in tax receipts) multiplied by the days of business disruption.

62

62

Table X.3 Income Loss Allowance

314D CBF NR13

Main Structures Count Income Loss Allowance ($)

Count Income Loss Allowance ($)

Count Income Loss Allowance ($)

House-and-store 2 100 1 50 0 00

Independent shops

45 2,250 1 50 57 2,850

Total 47 2,350 2 100 57 2,850

XI. RESETTLEMENT BUDGET AND FINANCING PLAN

125. Funds for the implementation of the RP are part of the Project budget. Costs have been estimated based on results of the IOL and the RCS as of July 2011.

A. Procedures for flow of funds

126. The IRC will request the MEF for the funds to implement the RP. The funds will be forwarded to the Provincial Department of Finance. Payment vouchers will be prepared at the RD-MEF for submission to and approval by the IRC. Funds for compensation and other entitlements will be forwarded by the Provincial Department of Finance to the PRSC for disbursement. Payment of compensation and other entitlements, except for land-for-land arrangements, will be in cash and will be given in commune offices. The AHs will be notified through the village chiefs of the schedule of payment of compensation and other entitlements.

B. Implementation, administration and contingency costs

127. Implementation costs cover payment of allowances and per diem of concerned personnel involved in the updating and implementation of the RP, including members of the provincial and district resettlement working groups. Administrative costs and contingencies amounting to 15% each have been added on top of the cost of resettlement. MPWT and IRC will ensure that adequate funds are made available as and when necessary for the efficient and timely implementation of resettlement.

C. Estimated Costs of Resettlement

128. The estimated cost of resettlement is US$1,380,966.58, inclusive of the cost for hiring an external monitoring agency. Table XI.1 provides a breakdown of these costs.

Table XI.1 Summary of Resettlement Costs (314D, CBF, NR13)

Items Unit Quantity Rate

($/Unit) AMOUNT

(US$)

LAND 88,442.41

Cultivated ROW land (loss of land use) m² 55,685.3 0.50 27,842.65 Private residential land (CBF) m² 2,250.6 11.80 26,557.08 Private agriculture/grazing land (CBF) m² 57,935.9 1.5 34,042.68

MAIN STRUCTURES 108,918.21

Partially affected houses and independent shops m² 2,162.9 varied 50,018.26 Repair cost of partially affected main structures $ 50,018.26 20% 10,003.65 Entirely affected houses and independent shops m² 3,846.80 varied 48,896.30

SECONDARY STRUCTURES 487,304.41

Extended eaves m² 10,011.90 varied 352,481.47

63

Items Unit Quantity Rate

($/Unit) AMOUNT

(US$)

Fence LM 35,152.80 varied 59,754.95 Shed m² 240.0 varied 3,996.20 Assorted other structures - - varied 71,071.79

TREES (Perennials and timber) No 12,738 varied 122,261.26

Sub-Total 1 806,926.29

ALLOWANCES AND OTHER ENTITLEMENTS Transportation allowance for relocating house and shops

@ AH 151 $50 7,550.00

Transportation allowance for 6 relocating house/shop renters

AH 6 $50 300.00

One time assistance allowance for relocating house * AH 48 200 9,600.00 One time assistance allowance for relocating independent shops *

AH 103 100 10,300.00

Income loss allowance for relocating shop, house/shop AH 106 $50 5,300.00 Rental allowance for relocating renters of house/store AH 6 $33 198.00 One time assistance allowance for vulnerable AHs

& AH 90 100 9,000.00

Income restoration program (IRP) block fund 536 $300 160,800.00

Sub-Total 2 203,048.00

External Monitoring/Evaluation Lump sum 68,000.00 TOTAL DIRECT COSTS 1,009,974.29

Administrative Cost (15%) 151,496.14

Costs contingencies (15%) 151,496.14

GRAND TOTAL (rounded) 1,380,966.58

* Based on the assumption that all those entitled will relocated outside ROW. The number of AHs relocating in or outside the ROW will be determined during DMS & The precise number of vulnerable AHs will be determined during updating of the resettlement plan

@The unit rate for transportation allowance used above is an estimated average. The precise entitlements per

household will be determined during updating of the resettlement plan depending on type of impact and where they relocate to.

129. Additional resources will also be provided by the Project to prepare and implement the updated resettlement plan which are costed elsewhere in the overall Project budget. These include:

a. Dedicated officers within the Social and Environment Unit of the PMU including

resettlement, gender and social specialists. b. Specialist consultants in the Project Supervision Assistant team including the

following specialists:

(i) Resettlement specialist (international 6 person-months, national 24 person-months);

(ii) Social/gender/IP specialist (international 6 person-months, national 24 person-months);

c. Other Provincial Line Agencies and mass organizations to be mobilized in support

of implementation of the Resettlement Plan (refer also to the section on Institutional Arrangements).

130. The details of the resettlement budget estimates are presented in Annex 7.

64

64

XII. INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS

131. The owner of the project is MPWT, the Executing Agency; therefore, it has over-all responsibility for the successful implementation of the RP. MPWT will be assisted by a number of offices within and outside the Ministry, starting with the Project Management Unit 3 (PMU3) that is tasked with undertaking the Project. With assistance from the ESO of MPWT, the PMU3 will work closely with the Resettlement Department of the Inter-ministerial Resettlement Committee (RD-IRC) relative to the preparation, updating, and implementation of the RP.

A. Environmental and Social Office

132. The Environmental and Social Office (ESO)11, under the Department of Planning of MPWT is the lead arm of the PMU3 in the preparation and implementation of the RP. The ESO presently has 9 staff, with plans to get 3 additional persons from other units of the Ministry. The staff members of the ESO work for both resettlement and environmental tasks. However, while all of them claim to be familiar with the conduct of socioeconomic survey, only 3 claim to know how to do the inventor of losses. None of the staff has the capacity to write an RP. For this reason, the project supervision consultants should prepare a training program for the staff of ESO in connection with the preparation, implementation, and monitoring of the RP.

133. The ESO will work closely with the IRC and Resettlement Department at the Ministry of Economy and Finance (RD-MEF). Its tasks include the following:

a. Secure the approval of the RP by the IRC;

b. Secure prior approval by IRC and the ADB for any variations in the approved RP;

c. Secure the data base of affected persons and assets that will be gathered during the preparation and updating of the RP;

d. Prepare progress reports on RP implementation for submission to the MPWT and PMU3.

B. IRC and the Resettlement Department

134. The IRC is a collegial body composed of representatives from concerned line ministries, such as the Council of Ministers (COM); the MPWT; and the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (MAFF), including representatives of the Municipality of Phnom Penh, the Governor and Deputy Governor of provinces traversed by the Project road. Created by the Prime Minister through Decision No. 13, dated 18 March 1997, in connection with the resettlement of APs in the Highway 1 Project (Loan 1659-CAM), it has since been involved in other foreign-assisted government infrastructure projects with involuntary resettlement.

135. The IRC will assume the function of a quasi-regulatory body, ensuring that funds for resettlement are spent properly and that the RP is carried out as intended. The technical arm of the IRC is RD-MEF. The RD-MEF will assist IRC in the following tasks:

11

Formerly the Social and Environmental Unit (SEU)

65

a. Reviewing and approving the RP, ensuring that the RP is consistent with ADB’s 2009 Safeguard Policy Statement (SPS) and, later, the loan agreement;

b. Endorsing the approved RP to ADB;

c. Establishing or convening the Provincial Resettlement Committee (PRSC) and its Working Group (WG);

d. Orienting, as needed, the PRSC and its working group (PRSC-WG) on their tasks relative to RP updating and implementation;

e. Securing from the national treasury the budget for carrying out the RP, ensuring that funds are available in a timely manner and in sufficient amounts;

f. Approving all disbursements connected with the implementation of the RP, such as payment of compensation and other entitlements, acquisition and preparation of replacement plots, operational expenses of personnel, etc.;

g. Ensuring that funds for resettlement are spent judiciously; and

h. With assistance from an independent organization, monitoring the implementation of the RP, ensuring that this is carried out in compliance with the Project resettlement policy and with the loan agreement.

C. Provincial Resettlement Sub-committee

136. The Provincial Resettlement Sub-Committee (PRSC) is a collegial body at the provincial level. Headed by the Provincial Deputy Governor, the members of the PRSC are provincial department directors of line ministries represented in the IRC, and also the chiefs of the districts and communes traversed by the Project road.

137. The technical arm of the PRSC is the Working Group (PRSC-WG). The PRSC-WG is headed by the Director (or a representative) of the Provincial Department of Public Works and Transport (PDPWT). The regular members of the PRSC-WG come from the Provincial Government, Provincial Department of Economy and Finance (MDEF), and the Ministry of Interior. The PRSC-WG has a counterpart at the district level composed of personnel from various line agencies.

138. In an effort to make the whole process of resettlement effective, participatory and transparent, the chiefs of the affected communes and villages, and a male and female representative each of the APs in affected communes will seat in the district RSC-WG in matters concerning their respective areas of jurisdiction.

139. The PRSC, through the provincial and district working groups, will have the following functions:

a. Facilitate a sustained public information campaign, ensuring that the public, especially the AHs, are updated on any developments regarding the Project and resettlement activities;

b. Spearhead the DMS and updated census of APs, including the updating of the rates used in calculating compensation and other entitlements to reflect prevailing market rates at the time of compensation;

c. Spearhead the selection, acquisition, and preparation of replacement plots, including the preparation of a coordinated schedule of delivery of compensation

66

66

and other entitlements, the relocation of people, harvesting of standing crops, and the start of civil works in a particular section of the Project road sections;

d. Spearhead the delivery of compensation and other entitlements to the AHs;

e. Receive and act on the complaints and grievances of AHs in accordance with the Project resettlement policy; and

f. Maintain a record of all public meetings, grievances, and actions taken to address complaints and grievances.

D. Project Supervision Consultants

140. The Project Supervision Consultants (PSC), together with the ESO and the PRSC-WG, will spearhead the updating of the RP through the conduct of the DMS in a participatory and transparent way and consistent with the Project resettlement policy. Once approved by the IRC and MPWT and concurred in by ADB, the PSC will provide technical advice in the implementation of the approved RP. The PSC will likewise provide capacity-building orientation and skills training, as needed, to concerned personnel of the PMU3, the ESO, and the Provincial and District Working Groups.

141. Together with the PMU3 and ESO, the PSC will supervise civil works activities to ensure that the contractors adhere with the terms of their contract relative to avoiding and/or minimizing resettlement impacts, in addition to ensuring that contractors provide the necessary compensation and/or assistance to the AHs prior to and/or during construction activities.

142. The PSC will have one international resettlement specialist (6 months, intermittent), a local resettlement specialist (12 months, intermittent), a local livelihood specialist (6 months, intermittent), and a local gender specialist (3 months, intermittent).

XIII. IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE

A. RP Updating and Implementation

143. Following completion of detailed engineering design, the RP will be updated. Resettlement implementation (i.e., land clearing and relocation of AHs) can only commence once ADB has reviewed and given its concurrence to it. Consultations with the AHs will be carried out on a continuing basis, paying particular attention to the vulnerable and severely affected households.

1. Setting-up the PRSC-WG

144. The Resettlement Department of the Inter-ministerial Resettlement Committee (IRC) will convene the Provincial Resettlement Sub-committee which in turn will work for the establishment of its Working Group (PRSC-WG). Headed by the Deputy Provincial Governor with the participation of the Director (or a representative) of the Provincial Department of Public Works and Transport (PDPWT), the regular members (i.e., not changing within the province) of the PRSC-WG come from the Provincial Government, Provincial Department of Economy and Finance (MDEF), and the Provincial Department of the Interior. Moreover, a male and female representative each of the AHs in a commune traversed by the project will be represented in the PRSC-WG. The PRSC-WG will coordinate closely with the Project supervision consultant (PSC), the civil works contractor, the local government, and the AHs to ensure the smooth and orchestrated updating and implementation of the RP.

67

2. Detailed measurement survey and updated census of APs

145. Following final design and staking of the corridor of impact (COI), a detailed measurement survey (DMS) and updated census of AHs will be carried out by the PRSC-WG with assistance from the Project supervision consultants (PSC). The procedures of the DMS are similar to those of the IOL, i.e., detailed recording of all users of land and owners of other assets. The PSC will train members of the resettlement sub-committee working group (RSWG) on the categorization scheme used in the RP as employed in the replacement cost study (RCS).

146. A new socio-economic survey will be carried out if RP updating does not commence within two years as demographic and socio-economic factors may change significantly within that period. It will cover at least 20% of severely affected AHs and at least 10% of other AHs losing main structures and productive assets.

B. Indicative implementation schedule of the RP

147. The table below summarizes the various inter-related activities connected with the updating and implementation of the RP.

Table XIII.1 Indicative Schedule of Resettlement Activities

Activities Schedule

RP preparation June – November2011

ADB concurrence of draft RP November2011

RP updating April 2012

Submission to and ADB concurrence of updated RP June 2012

Implementation of the approved updated RP July – December 2012

Internal monitoring (submission of quarterly reports) April 2012 – December 2012

External Monitoring (submission of bi-annual M&E reports) April 2012 – December 2013

XIV. MONITORING AND REPORTING

148. The ESO of MPWT and the IRC, through the Resettlement Department at the Ministry of Economy and Finance (RD-MEF), will conduct regular monitoring and evaluation of the updating and implementation of the RP. Said monitoring and evaluation is intended to help ensure that the RP is prepared according to the resettlement policy and that it is implemented as planned. The ESO is Government’s in-house monitoring body, while the RD-MEF, which will hire an independent organization, will be the Project’s external monitor.

A. Indicators for Internal monitoring

149. The following indicators will be monitored periodically by ESO:

a. Compensation and entitlements are computed at rates and procedures as provided in the approved RP;

b. AHs are paid as per agreement with Project authorities; c. Public information, public consultation and grievance redress procedures are followed

as described in the approved RP; d. Public facilities and infrastructure affected by the Project are restored promptly; and, e. The transition between resettlement and civil works is smooth.

68

68

B. External monitoring agency

150. The IRC will hire an independent organization to carry out external monitoring and post-implementation evaluation. The IRC will prepare the terms of reference (TOR) for this purpose. The TOR of the external monitoring organization (EMO) and the selection of the monitor will require the prior consent of ADB. The EMO will provide RD-MEF and ADB a copy of its semi-annual monitoring reports. The EMO will likewise conduct a Post-RP Implementation Evaluation Study one (1) year following the completion of resettlement.

Appendix 1

INVENTORY OF LOSSES

INSTRUCTION: To be accomplished for all persons/households with affected assets (i.e., structures, crops, trees, and land located within 10 meters from the centerline of the roadway or carriageway).

I. Identification of the Displaced Person (DP) / Affected Household (AH)

Name of Occupant/User/Owner of Affected Asset(s): Gender: [ ] Male [ ] Female

Age: ____ Physical condition: [ ] Normal [ ] Disabled Average Monthly Household Income ($): __________

Marital status:[ ] Married; [ ] Single; [ ] Divorced; [ ] Widow/er Name of spouse:

Ethnic affiliation: [ ] Khmer [ ] Cham [ ] Thai [ ] Other, specify:______________

Location of affected asset/s:

Village: Commune:

Code of DP/AH:

II. Affected Assets

A.1 Land:

Classification/ Use of Land*

Area and Tenure Status Over the Affected Land (indicate area of affected portion of the land [m²] in appropriate box below) Total Area of

Occupied/ Owned Land (m²)

Title/ Certificate

Certificate under

application

Rent or Lease

Occupying WITH

Permission

Occupying WITHOUT

Permission

1.

2.

*Examples of land classification or use: residential, commercial, farmland, forestland

A.2 If renting or occupying the affected land with permission from owner:

With Lease Agreement (Renting)

Address/Location of Land Owner With permission (not paying rent)Check the

box below Name of Land Owner

Amount of rental fee (Indicate in US$)

1.

2.

B.1 Structures* found on the affected land:

Type/Use of Affected Structure

Structure Classification**

Total area (m²) / Length (LM) of

Structure

Area (m²) /Length (LM) of

Structure Affected

State whether impact on

structure is PARTIAL or

TOTAL

Area (m²) /Length (LM) of Structure to be

Acquired

1.

2.

3.

*Examples of structures:house, storage, store/shop, house-and-store, fence, tomb, well, kitchen, toilet, waiting shed, concrete pavement, box culvert (driveway) access to residence, irrigation canal, etc. ** Specifics of classification: Use classification system of the local government.

B.2 Tenure status over the affected house/store/building:

Structure

Tenure*

Owner Tenant/ Renter

Occupying WITH Permission

Occupying WITHOUT Permission

1.

2.

*Check the appropriate box.

B.3 If affected house/store/building does not belong to the DP/AH:

Name of Owner of Affected House/Store/ Building

Address/Location of Building Owner

Paying Rent? Check appropriate box below

If Paying Rent, How much is Monthly Rent?

(Indicate in US$) No Yes

1.

2.

Appendix 1

70

C. Annual crops found on the affected land:

Name/Type of Annual Crops* Actual Area Planted to the Crop (m²) During IOL

1.

2.

*Examples of annual crops:rice, corn, sugarcane, cassava, etc.

D. Type and number (count) of perennials found on the affected land:

Name of Perennial Not Yet Fruit-bearing Fruit-bearing Categories*

Young About to bear fruit

A B C D

1.

2.

3.

4.

Total

*Specifics of categories:Use categories of the local government.

E. Type and count of timber trees found on the affected land:

Name of Perennial Timber Tree Categories*

A B C D

1.

2.

3.

4.

Total

*Specifics of categories:Use categories of the local government.

F. Loss of business, job, and income:

Nature of Business*

Net Monthly Income ($)

Duration of Disruption in Business Operation (Check

appropriate box) Paid Workers (if any)

Permanent Temporary Number Average Monthly

Salary of Workers ($)

1.

2.

*Examples of business:motor vehicle repair shop, grocery store, restaurant

III. Other Relevant Information on the DP/AH:

A. Information on other landholdings of the DP/AH not affected by the project:

Specifics Residential Commercial Land for Annual Crop

Garden and Land for Perennial

Pond

Tenure status*

Total area (m²)

*Specifics of tenure status: with title/certificate, certificate/title under process, with lease agreement, occupying with permission, occupying without permission

B. Relocation options for AHs losing entire (totally) house or building: (Check the appropriate box)

Relocation options Construct on remaining land in

the ROW Relocate to other landholdings

of the AH Landless (Relocate to

government relocation site)

__________________________

____________________ Name and Signature of AH or Representative Relationship with the

AH ____________________________

Name and Signature of Enumerator Date accomplished:________________

Appendix 1

IV. Sketch of affected land and relative location of other assets found thereat:

10 m COI

Start of Road

Centerline

10 m COI

Appendix 2

72

REPLACEMENT COST STUDY 1. Introduction 1. This report is to present the survey results of the Study of Replacement Cost for provincial roads improvement project, Southeast NR314D, NR 13 and Midwest NR150B, NR53 and NR151B, funded by ADB TA 7665-CAM. 2. Data collection for this study was conducted from 21 May 2011 to 01 July 2011 for Southeast section and from 06 July to 13 July 2011 for section Midwest.

2. Objective of the Study 3. The study is to establish compensation rates for structures, trees, and other non-land based income (e.g., businesses, fishponds, etc.). The aim is to ensure full restoration value of the affected/expropriated assets by the Project. 3. Survey Methodology 4. In order to achieve the above research objectives, the study required detailed preparations. First, it was necessary be become familiar with legal framework and associated resettlement and compensation issues in Cambodia. This was done during the first days of research planning. 5. Next, all available literature related to replacement cost study, and more particularly, resettlement and replacement cost study of road improvement projects. 6. The information gathering at the field for the calculation of replacement cost in the project area are as follows:

Canvass of construction material in districts traversed by the project road sections;

Interview contractors and builders in the local area to determine the current cost of labor in the construction sector;

Meet with government officials from the agriculture department, and land management department;

Hold focus group discussion with land owners and villagers together with commune and village officials; and

Interview local (commune and village) officials and residents, to find out the current market rate of fixed assets, especially land, in the project area as per record of recent sale transactions;

Interview with resident and agriculture product sellers to find out current market of fruit tree affected by the project.

7. Field data survey including measurement of affected stall and houses along the project road. Categories of houses are classified based on the roofing material and its sub-categories also were classified for those houses with similar material and price in average.

Appendix 2

73

4. Cambodia Legal Framework and Eligible Entitlements 4.1 Land Use within the right of way (ROW) in Cambodia 8. Throughout Cambodia it is very common to see people lives on and uses the land within the right of way (ROW) of a highway or road. Since we have full peace in Cambodia, 1993, the government never publicly claimed the land located within the later announced ROW, average Cambodians moved into the ROW zone, cultivating, operating business, building stores and houses. 4.2 Cambodia Legal Framework 9. The 1993 Constitution of Cambodia states that the “right to confiscate properties from any person shall be exercised only in the public interest as provided by law and shall require fair and just compensation in advance” (Article 44). 10. The Land Law of 2001 (NS/RKM/0801/14, 20 July 2001) governs land and property rights in Cambodia. Based on the provisions of the 1993 Constitution, it determines the regime of ownership of immovable properties that are defined as including land, trees and immovable structures. 11. The rights and responsibilities of the Royal Government of Cambodia (RGC) with respect to eminent domain are specified in the Land Law. The RGC can acquire private land (i) for public purposes under condition of (ii) fair and just compensation, (iii) paid in advance. The Land Law, Article 5, states:

“No person may be deprived of his ownership, unless it is in the public interest. An ownership deprivation shall be carried out in accordance with the forms and procedures provided by law and regulations and after the payment of fair and just compensation in advance.”

12. There are other provisions of the Land Law that are relevant to land acquisition, compensation and resettlement. The key provisions are indicated below:

(i) Legal possession as defined by the Law is the sole basis for ownership, and all transfers or changes of rights of ownership shall be carried out in accordance with the required general rules for sale, succession, exchange and gift or by court decision. (Article 6)

(ii) Any regime of ownership of immovable property prior to 1979 shall not be recognized. (Article 7)

(iii) State public land includes, among other categories, any property that is made available for public use such as roads. (Article 15)

(iv) Persons that illegally occupy, possess or claim title to state public land cannot claim any compensation. This includes land established by the RGC as public rights-of-way (ROW) for roads and railways. Moreover, failure to vacate illegally occupied land in a timely manner is subject to expel. (Article 19)

Appendix 2

74

(v) Persons with legally valid possession of land for five years (at the time the law came into effect) are allowed to register as the owner of the land (Article 30). Persons who (at the time the law came into effect) held legal possession but had not yet completed the five years were allowed to remain in possession until they were eligible to be registered as the owner. (Article 31)

(vi) However, temporary possession claims made by persons after the law comes into effect will not be recognized, rescinding a previous right under the 1992 Land Law for acquiring land by taking possession. (Articles 29, 34)

(vii) Landless people may apply for land for residential and subsistence farming purposes at no cost, as part of a social land concessions scheme. The concessionaire may obtain ownership of this land after fulfilling conditions set out in a separate Sub-Decree on Social Land Concessions. (Articles 50, 51)

13. The RGC Prakas No. 6, “Measures to Crack Down on Anarchic Land Grabbing and Encroachment” (No. 06 BRK, 27 September 1999) prohibits private ownership of State lands, including land adjacent to roads and railways. The Prakas establishes rights-of-way (ROW) for 2-digit national roads such as NR33 of 25 metres from the centerline. Ministry of Economy and Finance (MEF) Decree No. 961 (2000) declares that, in order to implement Prakas No. 6, the RGC will not pay compensation to people who occupy the ROW, for any structures or assets located on the land.

Table 4.1: Dimensions of Road ROW

Road Category ROW Dimensions

National Road 1, 4, 5 30 m from the centerline

Other 1-digit National Roads 25 m from the centerline

2-digit National Roads 25 m from the centerline

Provincial roads 20 m from the centerline

Commune roads 15 m from the centerline

5 ADB Policy 14. The objectives of the ADB Policy on Involuntary Resettlement (1995) and as refined in the New Safeguard Policy Statement (June 2009) are (i) to avoid impacts on people and the environment, where possible; (ii) where avoidance is not possible, minimize, mitigate, or compensate for adverse project impacts on the environment and the affected people; and (iii) help the executing agency strengthen its safeguard system. Towards this end, ADB resettlement policy includes the following principles:

m. Screen the project early on to identify past, present, and future involuntary resettlement impacts and risks. Determine the scope of resettlement planning through a survey and/or census of affected persons, including a gender analysis, specifically related to resettlement impacts and risks.

n. Improve, or at least restore, the livelihoods of all affected persons through (i)

land-based resettlement strategies when affected livelihoods are land based

Appendix 2

75

where possible or cash compensation at replacement value for land when the loss of land does not undermine livelihoods, (ii) prompt replacement of assets with access to assets of equal or higher value, (iii) prompt compensation at full replacement cost for assets that cannot be restored, and (iv) additional revenues and services through benefit sharing schemes where possible.

o. Provide physically and economically displaced persons with needed assistance,

including the following: (i) if there is relocation, secured tenure to relocation land, better housing at resettlement sites with comparable access to employment and production opportunities, integration of resettled persons economically and socially into their host communities, and extension of project benefits to host communities; (ii) transitional support and development assistance, such as land development, credit facilities, training, or employment opportunities; and (iii) civic infrastructure and community services, as required.

p. Improve the standards of living of the affected poor and other vulnerable groups,

including women, to at least national minimum standards. In rural areas provide them with legal and affordable access to land and resources, and in urban areas provide them with appropriate income sources and legal and affordable access to adequate housing.

q. Develop procedures in a transparent, consistent, and equitable manner if land

acquisition is through negotiated settlement. r. Ensure that affected persons without titles to land or any recognizable legal rights

to land are eligible for resettlement assistance and compensation for loss of non-land assets.

s. Prepare a resettlement plan elaborating on affected persons’ entitlements, the

income and livelihood restoration strategy, institutional arrangements, monitoring and reporting framework, budget, and time-bound implementation schedule.

t. Prepare a resettlement plan elaborating on affected persons’ entitlements, the

income and livelihood restoration strategy, institutional arrangements, monitoring and reporting framework, budget, and time-bound implementation schedule.

u. Disclose a draft resettlement plan, including documentation of the consultation

process in a timely manner, before project appraisal, in an acceptable place and a form and language(s) understandable to affected persons and other stakeholders. Disclose the final resettlement plan and its updates to affected persons and other stakeholders.

v. Conceive and execute involuntary resettlement as part of a development project

or program. Include the full costs of resettlement in the presentation of project’s cost and benefits. For a project with significant involuntary resettlement impacts, consider implementing the involuntary resettlement component of the project as a stand-alone operation.

w. Pay compensation and provide other resettlement entitlements before physical or

economic displacement. Implement the resettlement plan under close supervision throughout project implementation.

Appendix 2

76

x. Monitor and assess resettlement outcomes, their impacts on the standards of

living of affected persons, and whether the objectives of the resettlement plan have been achieved by taking into account the baseline conditions and the results of resettlement monitoring. Disclose monitoring reports.

15. The objective of ADB Policy on Indigenous Peoples (1998) and as refined in the New Safeguard Policy Statement (June 2009) is to design and implement projects in a way that fosters full respect for Indigenous Peoples’ identity, dignity, human rights, livelihood systems, and cultural uniqueness as defined by the Indigenous Peoples themselves so that they (i) receive culturally appropriate social and economic benefits, (ii) do not suffer adverse impacts as a result of projects, and (iii) can participate actively in projects that affect them. 16. The ADB Policy on Gender and Development (ADB, 2006; ADB, 1998) adopts gender mainstreaming as a key strategy for promoting gender equity, and for ensuring that women participate in and that their needs are explicitly addressed in the decision-making process for development activities. For projects that have the potential to have substantial gender impacts, a gender plan is prepared to identify strategies to address gender concerns and the involvement of women in the design, implementation and monitoring of the project. 17. However, since this project has minor negative impact on vendors at the above project area and the demolishment was done before the project study, the report of losses assessment has been required for the project based on the ADB safeguard policy rather than a resettlement plan.

6. Cost Calculation of Structure 6.1 Material Used for Shop Construction, Stall, House and Fence 18. To assess the loss of structures of both in this study, consultant will use the market rate from construction shop seller in the area as basis to estimate the impact. Hence compensation to affected people will reflect market rate. 19. In order to produce the table of materials for structures, the consultant interview construction shops along the project road that supply to people living in the area. An average of construction material was produced provided the assumption that people may buy construction material from different sources. 20. This study will produce two separate replacement cost tables for different geographic area and distance of transportation of construction materials. First table will be for Southeast section and second table is for Midwest section.

Table 6.1: Price of Construction Material along the Project Road- SOUTHEAST

Average for RCS

Item Description Qty Unit 2011 from Survey

A CEMENT 1 Elephant cement (Big) 1 ton

99.76 2 Elephant cement (Small) 1 ton 3 Diamond cement 1 ton 4 Camel cement 1 ton 5 Mountain cement 1 ton

Appendix 2

77

Average for RCS


B STEEL 1 Vietnam brand name Ø6,8 1 kg 0.93 2 Vietnam brand name Ø10 1 d 5.38 3 Vietnam Ø12, 14, 16 or 18mm 1 d 8.25 4 Steel Net 1 kg 1.29

C PLYWOOD FOR HOUSE PARTITION 1

1 Paper plywood 1 piece 4.21

2 3mm plywood 1 piece 5.78

3 5mm plywood 1 piece 6.00

D FLOORING

1 Chinese floor tile with low quality 1 m2 4.12

2 Chinese tile for wall 1 m2 4.19

3 Chinese floor tile for bathroom 1 m2 4.17

4 Concrete block 1 m2 4.00

E DOOR AND WINDOW

1 Wooden door 800x1800 1 set 40.00






7 Plastic door 1 set 14.58

8 Wood window, Duong Chem: 600x800 1 set 11.13



F ROOF COVER 1 Thai Tile (CPAC) 1 piece 0.51 2 Khmer Tile 1 piece 0.18 3 Thatch/palm leaves 1 piece 0.09

4 Steel sheet (2meters long) 1 sheet 2.44

5 Steel sheet (2.4meters long) 1 sheet 2.94 6 Steel sheet (3meters long) 1 sheet 3.40 7 Steel sheet (3.6meters long) 1 sheet 4.04 8 Fiber cement 1 sheet 2.50 G OTHERS 1 Terracotta (Kansaeng) 1 piece 0.25 2 Brick 1 piece 0.05 3 Gravel 1x2 Black 1 m3 27.75 4 Gravel 1x2 White 1 m3 23.75 5 Gravel 4x6 1 m3 14.00 6 Sand 1 m3 9.17 7 Concrete pipe for well d.800 1 pipe 6.25 8 Concrete pipe for well d.1000 1 pipe 10.00 9 Concrete pipe for drainage d.300 1 pipe 5.50

10 Concrete pipe for drainage d.400 1 pipe 8.25 11 Concrete pipe for drainage d.500 1 pipe 11.25 12 Concrete pipe for drainage d.600 1 pipe 15.00 13 Concrete pipe for drainage d.800 1 pipe 30.00 14 Soil filling 1 m3 1.63 15 Concrete fence column L=1700 1 post 2.25 H WOOD AND BAMBOO 1 Wood for column and roofing structure 1 m 440.00

Appendix 2

78

Average for RCS


2 Wood for other structure 2x20 1 m 2.40 3 Wood for other structure 4x4 1 m 0.83 4 Wood for other structure 4x12 1 m 2.38 5 Wood for other structure 12x12 1 m 8.75 6 Small pole 1 pole 1.00 7 Bamboo L=3000mm 20 pieces 2.50 8 Bamboo L=4000mm 20 pieces 3.00 I PAINTING 1 U 90 interior 1 cont. 21.50 2 U 90 exterior 1 cont. 25.13 3 Campaint 1 cont. 32.50 J PLASTIC PIPE 1 Dia. No 21 1 pipe 1.00 2 Dia. No 40 1 pipe 1.88 3 Dia. No 42 1 pipe 2.00 4 Dia. No 100 1 pipe 8.75 K CONGRET COLUM FOR HOUSE 1 Cheurng Tang L=300 1 column 1.25 2 Cheurng Tang L=400 1 column 1.50 3 Cheurng Tang L=500 1 column 2.00 4 Cheurng Tang L=600 1 column 2.00

5 Cheurng Tang L=800 1 column 2.25

6 Cheurng Tang L=1000 1 column 4.63

7 Concrete support column L=1500 1 column 5.50


Table 6.2: Price of Construction Material along the Project Road (Midwest)

Average for RCS


A CEMENT 1 Elephant cement (Big) 1 ton

95.58

2 Elephant cement (Small) 1 ton 3 Diamond cement 1 ton 4 Camel cement 1 ton 5 Mountain cement 1 ton 6 Dragon Cement 1 ton B STEEL 1 Vietnam brand name Ø6,8 1 kg 0.89 2 Vietnam brand name Ø10 1 d 5.69 3 Vietnam Ø12, 14, 16 or 18mm 1 d 8.13 4 Steel Net 1 kg 1.30 C PLYWOOD FOR HOUSE PARTITION 1 1 Paper plywood 1 piece 5.75 2 3mm plywood 1 piece 6.63 3 5mm plywood 1 piece 8.13 D FLOORING

1 Chinese floor tile with low quality 1 m2 3.75

2 Chinese tile for wall 200x300 1 m2 3.63

3 Chinese tile for wall 250x400 1 m2 4.50

4 Chinese floor tile for bathroom 1 m2 4.88

Appendix 2

79

Average for RCS


E DOOR AND WINDOW 1 Wooden door 800x1800 1 set 40.00 2 Wooden door 1000x2000 1 set 60.00 3 Wooden door 800x2000 1 set 101.25 4 Wooden door 1000x1800 1 set 120.00 5 Wooden door 1200x2000 1 set 140.00 6 Plastic door 1 set 20.00 7 Wood window, Duong Chem: 800x1100 1 set 35.00 F ROOF COVER 1 Thai Tile (CPAC) 1 pice 0.50 2 Khmer Tile 1 pice 0.54 3 Thatch/palm leaves 1 piece 0.05

4 Steel sheet (2 m long) 1 sheet 2.38

5 Steel sheet (2.4 m long) 1 sheet 2.75

6 Steel sheet (3 m long) 1 sheet 3.38

7 Steel sheet (3.6 m long) 1 sheet 4.00 8 Fiber cement 1 sheet 2.43 9 Concrete block 5.00 G OTHERS 1 Terracota (Kansaeng) 1 m2 3.00 2 Brick 1 piece 0.05 3 Gravel 1x2 Black 1 m3 21.50 4 Gravel 4x6 1 m3 14.58 5 Sand 1 m3 5.50 6 Concrete pipe for well d.800 1 pipe 6.50 7 Concrete pipe for well d.1000 1 pipe 8.25 8 Concrete pipe for drainage d.300 1 pipe 4.38 9 Concrete pipe for drainage d.400 1 pipe 7.50 10 Concrete pipe for drainage d.500 1 pipe 12.00 11 Concrete pipe for drainage d.600 1 pipe 16.00 12 Concrete pipe for drainage d.800 1 pipe 32.00 13 Soil filling 1 m3 1.50 14 Concrete fence column L=1700 1 post 2.50 H WOOD AND BAMBOO 1 Wood for column and roofing structure 1 m3 300.00 2 Pole dia. 50-60 1 pole 0.88 3 Small pole dia. Smaller than 50mm 1 pole 0.45 4 Bamboo L=5000 mm (1 m bamboo = 3000 R) 20 pieces 3.75 5 Bamboo L=3000mm 20 pieces 2.25 I PAINTING 1 U 90 interior 1 Bucket 20.00 2 U 90 exterior 1 Bucket 25.00 3 Campanit interior 1 Bucket 18.75 4 Campanit exterior 1 Bucket 25.00

J PLASTIC PIPE

1 Dia. No 21 1 pipe 1.10

2 Dia. No 40 1 pipe 2.00

3 Dia No 42 1 pipe 2.20

4 Dia. No 100 1 pipe 9.00

K CONGRET COLUM FOR HOUSE


Appendix 2

80

Average for RCS









6.2 Replacement Cost For Southeast Section (NR314D, NR13) 6.2.1 Cost Calculation of Existing Structure: Stall, Shop and House 21. The affected structures in the project area can be physically identified and classified into stall, shop, fence, house and other structures. 22. Below is the summary list of cost calculation for stall and shop with above market survey rate. The shops, stall and house of type 1 cannot compensate for setback labor since the moving of structure may damage to material and some of them cannot re-use. It is suggested that these type 1 structures shall be compensated at full market price. Table 6.3: Compensation Rates for Stall, Shop and House.

Type

Wall

Column

Floor

No. of Floor

Unit Cost

($/m2)

STALL, SHOP AND HOUSE

1. T

hatc

h/L

eave R

oo

f

1A No wall Small pole for supporting roof structure

Use soil as floor Single 3.90

1B No wall Small pole or used wood

Used wood or bamboo with small wood or bamboo structure, higher from soil about 0.3m-0.6m

Single: 0.3m-0.6m higher than natural soil

5.84

1C Thatch/ Leaves/ plastic, or mixed temporary materials

Pole or used wood Use soil as floor or with moveable bamboo bed or wooden bed

Single 7.32

1D Used metal with used wood or mixed temporary materials

Pole or used wood Used wood or bamboo with small wood or bamboo structure, higher from soil about 0.3m-1.2m


9.29

1E Earth wall Pole or used wood Use soil as floor Single 6.28

Appendix 2

81

Type

Wall

Column

Floor

No. of Floor

Unit Cost

($/m2)

1F Thatch/ Leaves/ plastic, or mixed temporary materials

Pole or used wood Lean Concrete Single 13.78

2. M

eta

l / F

ibe

r C

em

en

t R

oo

f

2A No wall Pole or used wood Use soil as floor Single 7.20

2B No wall Pole or used wood or low quality wood

Concrete Single 13.23

2C Earth wall with some temporary wall material such as metal sheet, wood, thatch, plastic.

Pole or used wood or low quality wood


2D Earth wall with some temporary wall material such as metal sheet, wood, thatch, plastic.




10.11

2E Wood wall with temporary material less than 10%




18.48

2F Metal wall Pole or used wood or low quality wood


2G Thatch wall Pole or used wood or low quality wood



10.08

2H Thatch wall Pole or used wood or low quality wood



10.90

2I Wood wall at first floor and only column at ground floor

Wood column with concrete support 0.60m

Wood floor (house on still), ground floor can be used for other purpose, not higher than 2.5m


42.45

2J Brick wall with plastering

Concrete column 20cm x 20cm

Concrete floor Single 33.66

Appendix 2

82

Type

Wall

Column

Floor

No. of Floor

Unit Cost

($/m2)

2K Brick wall for ground floor and wood wall for first floor

Hardwood columns Tile at ground floor and wooden floor with wood structure at first floor

Two stories: Ground floor with tile and first floor with wood plank

66.64

3. T

ile R

oo

f

3A Wooden wall with wooden structure

Wood column Concrete floor Single 52.76

3B Wood wall at first floor and only column at ground floor


Wood floor (house on still), ground floor can be used for other purpose, not higher than 2.5m


59.89

3C Wood wall at first floor and only column at ground floor


Tile at ground floor and wooden floor with wood structure at first floor

Two stories: Ground floor with tile and first floor with wood plank

71.18

4. C

on

cre

te

4A Brick wall Concrete column with foundation

Ground floor and mezzanine (half floor)

One story plus half floor with concrete slab (compensation rate for this type is based on every affected floor area)

102.45

4B Brick wall Concrete column with foundation

Ground floor, mezzanine, first floor and possibility of additional floor house

Multiple stories house (compensation rate for this type is based on every affected floor area)

141.59

6.2.2 Cost Calculation of Fence and Gate

23. In order to establish market price of fence and gate, construction material from above table and local contractor were interviewed and use as basis for the calculation. 24. Below costing the summary table of fence and gate.

Type Description Unit Unit Cost US Dollar

Remark

A FENCE

F1 Loose Fence (palm leave, bamboo, small wooden bar or mix of available local material)

1 LM 0.95 Some of the materials used not available in the market. In this case labor cost will be estimated for the calculation

F2 Wooden post with bamboo rebar or wire 1 LM 1.43

F3 Concrete column with its foundation, ground beam of 20cmx20cm; 2meters interval; no

1 LM 14.36 In case there is no foundation, it is suggested to compensate per

Appendix 2

83


Remark

wire post as indicated in price list of construction material from the shop plus labor cost and transportation to site (20% to material cost)

F4 Concrete post 1.5meter interval, 1.5 meter high with 8 horizontal wire

1 LM 4.04

F5 Concrete post 2meter interval, 2 meters high with wire or wire mesh; brick wall at lower part 0.3m-0.6m high

1 LM 7.99

F6 Concrete Post with plastering brick wall; 1.6m-2.0m high; 3.5m-4.0m interval

1 LM 31.31 Ventilation brick in some as part of brick wall also classified in same type

F7 Concrete column with plastering brick wall of 20cm; 1.8m-2.2m high; 3.5m-4.0m interval; decorative concrete baluster and decoration capital

1 LM 58.95

F8 Concrete column with plastering brick wall of 20cm; 1.8m-2.0m high; 3.5m-4.0m interval; decoration capital and steel rebar decoration with painting

1 LM 62.31

B GATE

1 Main entrance gate with 0.4m-0.6m column of 2.0m-2.5m high; Steel door

LS 122.15

2 Pagoda balustrade at the entrance gate 1 LM 44.24 Normally the entrance balustrade is at road entrance and some pagoda this balustrade locates in the ROW

3 School entrance or other public property entrance

LS 189.83 Public property

6.2.3 Cost Calculation of Other Structure

25. The methodology to calculate the cost of other structure and non structure also based on the interview with local people for their knowledge, labor cost together with price list from construction material shops. Item Description Unit Unit Rate

US Dollar Remark

OTHER STRUCTURE

1 Dug well (with concrete ring 800mm) and 6-12 meters depth

1 75.00

2 Pumped well 1 120.00

3 Earth grave 1 150.00

4 Concrete grave (Pray place) 1 500.00

5 Concrete in front of house 1m2 5.99

6 Concrete block 1m2 5.59

7 Terracotta 1m2 7.78

8 Main hold 1m x 1m LS 35.97

9 Brick drainage 1LM 31.96 1 meter depth, 1 meter wide

Appendix 2

84

Item Description Unit Unit Rate US Dollar

Remark

with concrete cover

10 Drainage pipe, dia. 40cm 1LM 12.09


12 Dug pond 1m2 6.00 2.0m-2.5m depth

13 Front roof extension (metal roof) 1m2 14.00

14 Walk passage into people’s property 1m2 3.69 For structure that not able to move as it may damage more than 50%. Full compensation is encouraged.

LABOR COST TO SET-BACK STRUCTURE

1 Labor to remove wooden passage crossing small canal into house

LS 5.00

2 Labor to set-back stall from COI LS 15.00

3 Labor to set-back house from COI LS 75.00 For distance not more than 15 meters from existing location

6.2.4 Land Value Estimation

26. Since the world economic downturn in late 2008, land price market in Cambodia is stable and has little sign of going up. From interview with local people, village chief and other property owner, the real estate sector in Cambodia is being recovered back especially in the area where development activities are planned i.e border between Cambodia-Vietnam (NR314D). Up to now there is no transaction in the study area, according to commune chief in Svay Rieng. 27. According to the data collection the price of land can be summarized as below table. Definition of land category are as following:

a. Commercial Land: Land near National Road Number 1 (near junction of NR1 and NR314D) and land near border with Vietnam.

b. Resident-cum-commercial land: refer to land or house serves as living and also doing business i.e near market or build-up area in rural, mostly at district level.

c. Residential land: land along the study road where village is located or vacant land within the village area.

d. Agriculture land: land for doing agriculture purpose along road project. e. Forest land: land that is far from village and is chiefly covered with small trees and

undergrowth.

No. Category of Land Average Price / m2 ($)

Remark

A National Road 314D (NR314D)

1 Commercial 112.27 Near border with Vietnam and Junction with NR1 only (where new market construction is on-going)

2 Resident-cum-commercial 22.00

3 Resident 11.80

4 Agriculture 1.50

B National Road 13 (NR13)

1 Commercial 45.20 Junction with NR1 and NR8

2 Resident-cum-commercial 20.00

Appendix 2

85

No. Category of Land Average Price / m2 ($)

Remark

3 Resident 11.70

4 Agriculture 1.40

5 Forest land 0.60

6.2.5 Crops and Trees

28. Crop and tree were calculated based on harvesting yield and maturity time of different tree species interviewed with local people in the area. According to compensation experience of IRC in previous project tree below 3 years get 1/3 of full mature cost, 3 to 5 year compensate 2/3 of full mature cost and 5 years over compensate with full yield cost.

No. Type Unit Unit Cost US Dollar

Remark

TREE

1 Mango Tree 55.84

2 Coconut Tree 46.41

3 Tamarin Tree 39.17

4 Lemon/Lime Tree 29.00

5 Jackfruit Tree 49.71

6 Custard apple Tree 9.29

7 Sugar Palm tree Tree 51.50

8 Bamboo Tree 0.96

9 Persimon tree Tree 16.89

10 Acacia/ Eucalyptus Tree 6.50

11 Cashew Tree 18.84

12 Pring tree Tree 25.00

13 Kantuort Tree 6.31

14 Jujube Tree 6.00

15 Kro khob Tree 2.50

16 Ampil Teuk Tree 12.33

17 Sdao Tree 12.75

18 Chom-phu Tree 5.33

19 Oy Moy Tree 6.88

20 Sandoricum tree Tree 17.00

21 Kor Tree 6.21

22 Krasang Tree 26.25

23 Makak Tree 12.88

24 Chrey Krem Tree 5.00

25 Tkov Tree 10.00

26 Trakob Barang Tree 11.50

27 Ka ngork Tree 7.50

28 Deum Chhat Tree 4.00

29 Kvet Tree 13.46

30 Orange Tree 26.00

31 Areca nut tree Tree 17.50


33 Pine tree Tree 12.00

Appendix 2

86


Remark

34 Angkear Dei Tree 8.00

35 Rubber tree Tree 15.00

36 Smach Tree 6.00

37 Guava Tree 7.18

38 Ang Kanh Tree 5.00

39 Champei Tree 10.00

40 Others Tree 4.00 to 15.00

CROP

1 Papaya Tree 5.33

2 Banana Tree 2.60

3 Cassava Tree 0.50

6.3 Replacement Cost For Midwest Section (NR150B, NR53, NR151B) 6.3.1 Cost Calculation of Existing Structure: Stall, Shop and House 29. The Midwest section of this study combines three road sections, NR150B, NR53 and NR151B. Type of structures along these sections is not very much different. They can be classified into types and category12 as in below table. All structures are classified into four categories in which each category has different types. Table 6.4: Compensation Rates for Stall, Shop and House

Type

Wall

Column

Floor

No. of Floor

Unit Cost

($/m2)

STALL, SHOP AND HOUSE

1. T

hatc

h/L

eave R

oo

f

1a No wall (stall on ROW)

Small pole for supporting roof structure


1b Thatch/ Leave Pole or used wood Used wood or bamboo with small wood or bamboo structure, higher from soil about 0.3m-0.6m


7.04

1c Thatch/ Leaves or partly metal

Pole or used wood Bamboo or used wood or mix of bamboo and wood with small wooden structure

Single: House-on-still; Ground floor is soil; more than 2.0 -2.5 meters high

8.76

12

The structure’s category and type in this study is not equivalence to same category in other study (in Southeast Section).

Appendix 2

87

Type

Wall

Column

Floor

No. of Floor

Unit Cost

($/m2)

1d Used wood/ wood with thatch (10-15% of total wall area)

Pole or used wood Concrete floor Single 12.06

2. M

eta

l/ F

iber

Cem

en

t R

oo

f

2a No (selling stall on ROW)

Pole No: use soil as floor Single 6.68

2b Thatch/ thatch and used wood (15-20%)

Pole/ wood - Bamboo/ used wood: 0.3m-0.6m high from ground

- Concrete floor: on compacted ground

Single 12.10

2c Metal Pole/ wood Concrete floor on compacted land/ raised land of less than 20cm high

Single 14.77

2d Wood/ Brick with no plaster

Pole/ wood Concrete floor on compacted soil

Single 15.06

2e Wood/ Brick with no plaster

Pole/ wood - Concrete floor on compacted soil

- Wood floor: 0.30m-0.60m above soil

Single: 0.30m-0.60m above soil

20.29

2f Thatch -Concrete column at from ground -Wood column/ pole on upper floor

House on still: Bamboo or used wood with wooden structure


26.55

2g Metal 80% and Thatch 20%

Pole/ wood House on still: wood with wooden structure


27.10

2h Brick with plastering: exterior and interior

Concrete Tile on compacted soil

Single: only ground floor

35.45

2i Wood wall - Concrete for first floor - Wood column on first floor

- Compacted soil at ground floor - Wood floor with wooden structure on first floor


36.37

3. T

ile

Ro

of

3a Thatch: for house on still

Wood Wood with wooden structure


42.48

Appendix 2

88

Type

Wall

Column

Floor

No. of Floor

Unit Cost

($/m2)

3b Wood plank with wooden structure

- Concrete from ground - Wood on first floor

Wood with wooden structure


49.85

4. C

on

cre

te

4a Brick wall Concrete column with foundation

Ground floor and mezzanine (half floor)

One story plus half floor with concrete slab (compensation rate for this type is based on every affected floor area)

99.75

4b Brick wall Concrete column with foundation

Ground floor, mezzanine, first floor and possibility of additional floor house

Multiple stories house (compensation rate for this type is based on every affected floor area)

140.96

6.3.2 Cost Calculation of Fence and Gate

30. The road project will need to remove some property fences of different classification. Material chosen will alter the cost of building a fence and gate. Below costing the summary table of fence and gate based on market rate of construction material available in the project area. Type Description Unit Unit Cost

US Dollar Remark

A FENCE

f 1 Loose Fence (palm leave, bamboo, small wooden bar or mix of available local material)

1 LM 0.83 Some of the materials used not available in the market. In this case labor cost will be estimated for the calculation

f 2 Wooden post with bamboo rebar or wood rebar

1 LM 1.78

f 3 Concrete post 1.5meter interval, 1.5 meter high with 8 horizontal wire

1 LM 4.52

f 4 Concrete post 2meter interval; brick wall at lower part with plastering both sides of about 60-80cm; 2 meters high (from ground) with wire or wire mesh; brick wall at lower part 0.3m-0.6m high

1 LM 12.20

f 5 Concrete Post with plastering brick wall; 1.6m-2.0m high; 3.5m-4.0m interval

1 LM 34.20 Ventilation brick in some as part of brick wall also classified in same type

f 6 Concrete column with plastering brick wall of 20cm; 1.8m-2.2m high; 3.5m-4.0m interval; decorative concrete baluster and decoration capital

1 LM 61.15

B GATE

Appendix 2

89


Remark

1 Main entrance gate with 0.4m-0.6m column of 2.0m-2.5m high; Steel door

LS 131.26

2 School entrance or other public property entrance

LS 190.26 Public property. Fence will compensated based on above type.

6.3.3 Cost Calculation of Other Structure

31. To get the cost of this structure it is also based on the interview with local people for their knowledge, labor cost together with price list from construction material shops. Item Description Unit Unit Rate

US Dollar Remark

OTHER STRUCTURE

1 Dug well (with concrete ring 800mm) and 6-12 meters depth

1 80.00

2 Pumped well 1 120.00

3 Earth grave 1 1800.00

4 Concrete in front of house 1m2 5.59

5 Concrete block 1m2 5.67

6 Terracotta 1m2 7.89

7 Main hold 1m x 1m LS 33.64

8 Brick drainage 1LM 30.00 1 meter depth, 1 meter wide with concrete cover


10 Dug pond 1m2 6.00 2.0m-2.5m depth

11 Front roof extension (metal roof) 1m2 14.00

12 Walk passage into people’s property 1m2 3.50 For structure that not able to move as it may damage more than 50%. Full compensation is recommended.

LABOR COST TO SET-BACK STRUCTURE

1 Labor to remove wooden passage crossing small canal into house

LS 5.00

2 Labor to set-back stall from COI LS 15.00 Stall with thatch roof/wall shall be compensated 100%

3 Labor to set-back house from COI LS 75.00 For distance not more than 15 meters from existing location

6.3.4 Land Value Estimation

32. The land market in Cambodia has very little sign of going up in urban area. From interview with local people, village chief and other property owner the land in rural area has no activity at all since the down turn of world economic. Up to now there is no transaction in the study area, according to commune chief along the project influence area.

Appendix 2

90

33. According to the data collection (from group discussion and interview with commune chief) the price of land was calculated based on its category. Definition of land category are as following:

a. Commercial Land: Land near National Road Number 5 (near junction of NR5 and NR150B; NR150B and NR53).

b. Resident-cum-commercial land: refer to land or house serves as living and also doing business i.e near market or build-up area in rural, mostly at district level.

c. Residential land: land along the study road where village is located or vacant land within the village area.

d. Agriculture land: land for doing agriculture purpose along road project. e. Forest land: land that is far from village and is chiefly covered with small trees and

undergrowth. 34. Except from junction of NR5 and NR150B to riverside, the rest of national roads are pass through similar category of land i.e. residential, agriculture and forestland. The average cost of land can be summarized in below table.

No. Category of Land Average Price / m2

US Dollar

Remark

National Road NR150B, NR53 and NR151B

1 Commercial 105.00 Market area near NR5 and junction of NR150B and NR53

2 Resident-cum-commercial 28.68 Taches and Teuk Phos

3 Resident 8.08

4 Agriculture 1.20

5 Forest land 0.18

6.3.5 Crops and Trees

35. In order to simplify the study, trees have been classified in three types as following:

a. Sapling- below one year: will not get compensation as it can be re-planted, b. Small tree- one to three year: 1/3 of full price, c. Young tree- bearing some fruit: 2/3 of full price, d. Mature- full bearing tree: compensate full price.

36. From the survey, full compensation cost of trees is calculated and summary in below table:


Remark

TREE

1 Mango Tree 48.81

2 Coconut Tree 44.37

3 Tamarin Tree 38.33

4 Lemon/Lime Tree 36.66

5 Jack Tree 42.50

Appendix 2

91


Remark

6 Custard apple Tree 13.58

7 Sugar Palm tree Tree 46.75

8 Bamboo Tree 0.30

9 Acacia/ Eucalyptus Tree 6.25

10 Cashew Tree 21.75

11 Pring tree Tree 24.28

12 Kantuort Tree 5.83

13 Jujube Tree 5.00

14 Kro khob Tree 2.25


16 Sdao Tree 12.50

17 Chom-phu Tree 6.00

18 Oy Moy Tree 5.00

19 Sandoricum tree Tree 10.00

20 Kor Tree 5.50

21 Krasang Tree 25.00

22 Makak Tree 12.88

23 Chrey Krem Tree 5.00

24 Tkov Tree 8.00

25 Trakob Barang Tree 11.50

26 Ka ngork Tree 7.50

27 Deum Chhat Tree 5.00

28 Kvet Tree 13.46

29 Orange Tree 26.00

30 Areca nut tree Tree 17.50


32 Guava Tree 7.75

33 Longan Tree 30.00

34 Teuk Doh Kor Tree 31.25

35 Leung Reach Tree 5.00

36 Others Tree 4.00 to 15.00

CROP

1 Papaya Tree 5.00

2 Banana Tree 2.77

7. Recommendation for Replacement Cost Implementation 37. The compensation of the affected structure will be calculated based on the affected floor area at market price for every development projects in Cambodia. During IOL survey it is found that:

a. Some of the structures are partially affected; b. Some structures can setback; c. Some structures of type 2 and 3 can cut and repair with not much difficult and

disturbance; and

Appendix 2

92

d. Structure of type 4 is very hard to cut or dismantle, as it is concrete structure that has fixed foundation. Compensation to only affected structure cannot cover its replacement cost since the damage will be bigger than estimated (affected square meter of floor area x market price of structure).

38. Based on the above findings, it is recommended that:

No.

Structure type

Recommendation

1 Type I If the column is fix into the soil, 100% compensation if setback or relocated, regardless if it is partially affected

2 Type II Compensation based on affected floor area of the structure

3 Type III Compensation based on affected floor area of the structure

4 Type IV During implementation, compensation should not be based on affected area if it is partially affected from road axis to the front of house (less than 3meters). The replacement cost calculation for this type is: Width of affected structure x 3/4 meters of first two columns (first span) x market rate per floor area.

Appendix 3

93

No. Code Side Name of Affected Household Commune

Type of Land Type of Affected Structure

Residential (m

2)

Commercial (m

2)

Farmland (m

2) House House and Store Store/ Shop

1 53 L Mom Saphy Sangkhor 126 Partial

2 6 R Noun Somarn Sangkhor 28 48 Partial

3 67 L Chan Sinat Sangkhor 90 Entire

4 21 R Owner not available Sangkhor 500 Entire

5 3 L Leav Soun Sangkhor 350 Entire

6 15 L Put Saran Sangkhor 280 Entire

7 55 L Hei Chourn Sangkhor 280 Partial

8 31 L Meak Phalla Sangkhor 157.5 Entire

9 45 L Mao Kunthea Sangkhor 126 Entire

10 51 L Owner not available Sangkhor 114 Partial

11 27 L Sin Makara Sangkhor 90 Partial

12 23 L Tae Chorn Sangkhor 75 Entire

13 17 L Mob Chan Sangkhor 60 Partial

14 20 R Paen Sokha Sangkhor 54 Entire

15 63 L Prak Net Sangkhor 37.5 Entire

16 73 L Chark Chorn Sangkhor 36 Entire

17 32 R Orn Saran Sangkhor 24 Entire

18 50 R Neang Cheanorna Sangkhor 20 Partial

19 19 L Ghean Chan Sangkhor 18 Partial

20 5 L Langh Keomleang Sangkhor 16 Entire

21 58 R Saom Sreymom Sangkhor 13 Partial


23 61 L Mom Sarourn Sangkhor 12 Entire

24 13 L Pop Anararn Sangkhor 12 Entire

25 37 R Kheav Vanny Sangkhor 185 Partial

26 18 R Morn Vanaroum Sangkhor 168 Partial

27 48 R Haor Muoy Sangkhor 112.5 Partial

28 78 R Owner not available Sangkhor 96 Partial

Appendix 3

94



Residential (m

2)

Commercial (m

2)

Farmland (m


29 35 L Khut Hourn Sangkhor 60 Partial

30 66 R Mom Tha Sangkhor 60 Partial

31 71 L Mao Phally Sangkhor 40 Partial

32 57 L Pich Sitha Sangkhor 39 Partial


34 38 R Meas Chinda Sangkhor 18 Entire

35 29 L Meak Vantha Sangkhor 12 Entire

36 81 L Pov Socheat Sangkhor 10 Partial

37 42 R Owner not available Sangkhor 9 Partial

38 12 R Chaiy Veasna Sangkhor 8 Partial

39 79 L Pov Vichet Sangkhor 5.5 Partial

40 83 L So Somart Sangkhor 32

41 75 L Reach Someourn Sangkhor 4

42

Sangkhor Sangkhor 5820

43 43 L Owner not available Sangkhor 400

44 70 R Owner not available Sangkhor 180

45 49 L Saus Sovan Sangkhor 168



48 47 L Sok Saoun Sangkhor 150

49 59 L Bun Thoul Sangkhor 133

50 68 R Peork Savun Sangkhor 120

51 1 L Saom Chanthy Sangkhor 120






57 82 R Nhem Sitha Sangkhor 100

Appendix 3

95



Residential (m

2)

Commercial (m

2)

Farmland (m




60 16 R Meong Sararn Sangkhor 74

61 52 R Van Sophana Sangkhor 72



64 65 L Em Someourn Sangkhor 66

65 56 R Kaov Somol Sangkhor 57




69 41 L Srey Euom Sangkhor 40



72 30 R Sos Samala Sangkhor 35

73 80 R Chab Phalla Sangkhor 32

74 9 L Sous Sear Sangkhor 30

75 14 R Kol Savun Sangkhor 30

76 7 L Pich Sinong Sangkhor 20

77 11 L Sin Komphaerk Sangkhor 20

78 69 L Sok Sarnd Sangkhor 19

79 28 R Hum Sokda Sangkhor 14




83 40 R Eaem Bros Sangkhor 9

84 77 L Chan Shart Sangkhor 8

85 76 R Doch Sitha Sangkhor 5

86 216 R Vea Sanorn Kampong Chak 368 Entire

Appendix 3

96



Residential (m

2)

Commercial (m

2)

Farmland (m


87 179 L Kheom Sophy Kampong Chak 279 Partial

88 248 R Sao Sarin Kampong Chak 117 Entire

89 192 R Srey Oark Kampong Chak 90 Partial

90 234 R So Seorn Kampong Chak 78 Entire

91 212 R Chab Den Kampong Chak 55 Partial

92 232 R Ouk Peng Kampong Chak 45 Entire

93 244 R Owner not available Kampong Chak 40 Partial

94 242 R Chin Raen Kampong Chak 37 Entire

95 173 R Sem Bontuern Kampong Chak 30 Partial

96 88 R kong Rith Kampong Chak 20 Partial

97 181 L Owner not available Kampong Chak 18 Partial

98 175 L Sem Bonton Kampong Chak 11 Entire

99 93 L Arn Rithy Kampong Chak 8 Partial

100 168 R Touch Sarith Kampong Chak 31.5 Partial

101 176 R Yuong Vanny Kampong Chak 3 Partial

102 151 L Men Saren Kampong Chak 65.6 Partial

103 159 L Pong Savon Kampong Chak 24.8 Partial

104 95 L Koy Chinda Kampong Chak 22 Partial

105 177 L Owner not available Kampong Chak 183 Partial

106 202 R Keom Sakhorn Kampong Chak 165 Partial

107 183 L Thorn Boraen Kampong Chak 110 Partial

108 138 R Horm Somart Kampong Chak 76 Entire

109 180 R Seing Heang Kampong Chak 60 Entire

110 166 R Mom Phal Kampong Chak 45 Partial

111 123 L Laiy Ky Kampong Chak 40 Partial

112 160 R Agen Sochea Kampong Chak 40 Partial


114 150 R Agou Vannary Kampong Chak 34 Partial

115 172 R Toch Veasna Kampong Chak 33.6 Partial

Appendix 3

97



Residential (m

2)

Commercial (m

2)

Farmland (m


116 210 R Som Sindara Kampong Chak 33 Partial

117 198 R Owner not available Kampong Chak 24 Entire



120 154 R Chear Lung Kampong Chak 20 Entire

121 182 R Eaek Sokhom Kampong Chak 20 Partial

122 188 R Bo Kosal Kampong Chak 20 Partial

123 170 R Mouk Chantha Kampong Chak 18 Partial

124 144 R Ngen Thoun Kampong Chak 16 Partial



127 186 R Porng Charoun Kampong Chak 8 Partial

128 139 L Yeon Horn Kampong Chak 46.8

129 137 L koy Bophal Kampong Chak 46.8

130 119 L Raot Someourn Kampong Chak 56

131 145 L Chea Net Kampong Chak 28

132 117 L Raort Someourn Kampong Chak 24

133 129 L Preab Chantha Kampong Chak 18

134 208 R Tey Sokong Kampong Chak 15

135 87 L Yonh Sarorn Kampong Chak 12.5

136

Kampong Chak Kampong Chak 610

137 230 R Owner not available Kampong Chak 312

138 236 R Kort Saphart Kampong Chak 300

139 113 L Owner not available Kampong Chak 200

140 96 R Ou Rady Kampong Chak 180

141 169 L Som Sindara Kampong Chak 115

142 99 :L Kong Chan Kampong Chak 108

143 143 L Ngun Kan Kampong Chak 104


Appendix 3

98



Residential (m

2)

Commercial (m

2)

Farmland (m


145 214 R Ghorn Somnang Kampong Chak 92.5

146 90 R Mao Chanra Kampong Chak 90

147 163 L Yem Sain Kampong Chak 87.5

148 220 R Eaek Nourn Kampong Chak 84

149 224 R Owner not available Kampong Chak 81.4



152 238 R Paen Sitha Kampong Chak 56


154 246 R Sor Pleak Kampong Chak 52



157 106 R Ork Orn Kampong Chak 49

158 127 L Keaov Sounry Kampong Chak 48

159 142 R Hem Rathy Kampong Chak 48

160 204 R Pich Heng Kampong Chak 45

161 167 L En Mara Kampong Chak 43

162 108 R Sok Chanthorn Kampong Chak 41

163 101 L Horm Somoun Kampong Chak 40



166 97 L khen Savorn Kampong Chak 38

167 92 R Mao Chanra Kampong Chak 36

168 131 L Paen Kunthea Kampong Chak 35

169 140 R Owner not available Kampong Chak 34.5


171 100 R Peang Sourn Kampong Chak 32


173 149 L Koy Ang Kampong Chak 30

Appendix 3

99



Residential (m

2)

Commercial (m

2)

Farmland (m


174 130 R Van Hong Kampong Chak 29.8

175 102 R Gheom Sophal Kampong Chak 28

176 200 R Hor Sarun Kampong Chak 28

177 206 R Nou Samut Kampong Chak 25




181 155 L Doch Sitha Kampong Chak 24

182 94 R Ngun Chenda Kampong Chak 24



185 158 R Som Saophaurn Kampong Chak 20

186 121 L Sun Chea Kampong Chak 20

187 91 L Chab Panha Kampong Chak 18

188 84 R Eoung Phea Kampong Chak 18




192 146 R Ngen Ra Kampong Chak 16

193 164 R Rous Nary Kampong Chak 16

194 152 R Saem Lynna Kampong Chak 16

195 222 R Nay Sor Kampong Chak 14

196 116 R Tit Sophal Kampong Chak 14

197 114 R Pich Saran Kampong Chak 14

198 161 L Eom Sokha Kampong Chak 14

199 128 R Bei Sinart Kampong Chak 13.4


201 115 L Preeab Vuthy Kampong Chak 12.9


Appendix 3

100



Residential (m

2)

Commercial (m

2)

Farmland (m






207 153 L Meas Kala Kampong Chak 12

208 157 L Maen Vanno Kampong Chak 12

209 133 L Sok Sanourn Kampong Chak 12

210 147 L Kem Oun Kampong Chak 12

211 226 R Mok Samet Kampong Chak 10.8



214 86 R Yun Solaod Kampong Chak 10


216 104 R Peng Charly Kampong Chak 8


218 165 L Owner not available Kampong Chak

219 282 R Nhean Sara Sangkae 200 Entire

220 215 L Vong Ban Sangkae 164 Entire

221 205 L Pov Sareon Sangkae 156 Partial

222 274 R Vong Soka Sangkae 148 Entire

223 207 L Vong Sary Sangkae 130 Partial

224 191 L Owner not available Sangkae 120 Partial

225 235 L Nuon Khemsoly Sangkae 112 Entire

226 280 R Ou Savan Sangkae 110 Partial

227 254 R Chai Rith Sangkae 77 Entire

228 284 R Paen Someourn Sangkae 72 Partial

229 237 L Kem Leok Sangkae 68 Entire

230 189 L Ping Somant Sangkae 53.8 Entire

231 262 R Hun Sangh Sangkae 45 Partial

Appendix 3

101



Residential (m

2)

Commercial (m

2)

Farmland (m


232 203 R Meas Sal Sangkae 40 Partial

233 278 R Kheom Horn Sangkae 30 Partial

234 223 L Ky Chanthy Sangkae 20 Entire

235 276 R Som Raksa Sangkae 196 Entire

236 185 L Owner not available Sangkae 70 Entire

237 195 L Sen Savan Sangkae 48 Partial

238 213 L Mok Sangkae 46 Partial

239 231 L Agom Heng Sangkae 32 Partial

240 225 L Owner not available Sangkae 30 Entire

241 199 L Som Saphan Sangkae 24 Partial

242 227 L Yen Nimit Sangkae 20 Partial

243 219 L Meong Soun Sangkae 12 Entire

244 221 L Thy Chuomneagh Sangkae 8 Entire

245

Sangkae Sangkae 1780

246 233 L Chuom Sitha Sangkae 186

247 264 R Tem Net Sangkae 161

248 252 R Agoum Sinon Sangkae 148

249 197 L Owner not available Sangkae 144

250 260 R Key Kheorn Sangkae 120

251 217 R Kem Por Sangkae 104

252 266 R Ey Som Sangkae 96

253 268 R Owner not available Sangkae 78

254 256 R Peong Southy Sangkae 72

255 209 L Owner not available Sangkae 70

256 258 R Prum Sokhom Sangkae 66.5



259 193 L Real Vantha Sangkae 44

260 211 L Nhem Seak Sangkae 27.5

Appendix 3

102



Residential (m

2)

Commercial (m

2)

Farmland (m


261 288 R Eoung Meang Sangkae 24

262 286 R Yard Sina Sangkae 22.5

263 201 L Pin Ant Sangkae 20

264 270 R Pin Sinat Sangkae 16.5


266 304 R Horn Sarin Chrung Popel 34 Entire

267 253 L Pov Saarn Chrung Popel 200 Entire

268 263 L Sem Kim Chrung Popel 42 Entire

269 334 R Heang Sookha Chrung Popel 39.6 Partial

270 338 R Owner not available Chrung Popel 20 Entire

271 251 L Koy Know Chrung Popel 20 Entire

272 239 L Som Saran Chrung Popel Partial

273 316 R Taong Peangly Chrung Popel 182 Partial

274 259 L Chy Chaun Chrung Popel 40 Partial

275 249 L Kaov Pong Chrung Popel 36 Entire

276 255 L Porn Parn Chrung Popel 35 Partial

277 336 R Pov Phyone Chrung Popel 35 Entire

278 312 R Chem Somoun Chrung Popel 22 Partial

279 265 L En Dara Chrung Popel 16 Partial

280 267 L Prak Sarem Chrung Popel 15 Partial

281 247 L Prak Chanra Chrung Popel 14 Partial

282 257 L Pov Sameurn Chrung Popel 12.5 Partial

283 241 L Owner not available Chrung Popel 11 Entire

284 245 L Bo Rithy Chrung Popel 5 Partial

285 243 L Owner not available Chrung Popel 4.5 Partial

286 292 R Owner not available Chrung Popel 120

287 300 R Peach Sarorn Chrung Popel 68

288 314 R Pich Sarin Chrung Popel 66.2

289 308 R Neob Norn Chrung Popel 33

Appendix 3

103



Residential (m

2)

Commercial (m

2)

Farmland (m


290

Chrung Popel Chrung Popel 1830

291 332 R Nong Vana Chrung Popel 307.5


293 346 R Seong Sophart Chrung Popel 200

294 298 R Sao Sophal Chrung Popel 142.5


296 324 R Kov Neang Chrung Popel 120

297 296 R Chan Chorn Chrung Popel 80

298 273 L Owner not available Chrung Popel 66

299 294 R Soun Satja Chrung Popel 60

300 320 R Sea Sisophorn Chrung Popel 54

301 271 L Khen Nourn Chrung Popel 52.5

302 269 L Owner not available Chrung Popel 47.1

303 322 R Kong Someak Chrung Popel 41.8

304 310 R Teib Chantha Chrung Popel 40

305 302 R Yi Sarin Chrung Popel 40

306 261 L Owner not available Chrung Popel 30

307 318 R Ghorn Sophea Chrung Popel 28

308 328 R Pov Dara Chrung Popel 27

309 340 R Soun Kim Chrung Popel 21

310 330 R Nut Saraen Chrung Popel 18

311 342 R Van Bunrorn Chrung Popel 12

312 306 R Kao Oun Chrung Popel 9

313 344 R Yen Nourn Chrung Popel 5

314 285 L Toch Saban Kampong Ampil 40 Entire Entire

315 289 L Mork Toch Kampong Ampil 80 Partial

316 287 L Noun Ra Kampong Ampil 14 Entire

317 275 L Sous Sokhom Kampong Ampil 12 Entire

318 279 L Chan Laord Kampong Ampil 64 Entire

Appendix 3

104



Residential (m

2)

Commercial (m

2)

Farmland (m


319 378 R Chan Saban Kampong Ampil 18 Entire

320 283 L Owner not available Kampong Ampil 16 Entire

321 277 L Owner not available Kampong Ampil 8 Partial

322 352 R Vea Thea Kampong Ampil 6 Partial

323 281 L Morn Somporse Kampong Ampil 10 Entire

324

Kampong Ampil Kampong Ampil 370

325 348 R Leok Suod Kampong Ampil 160

326 356 L Owner not available Kampong Ampil 50

327 350 R Khourn Sarin Kampong Ampil 48

328 354 R Kaort Sothuon Kampong Ampil 20

329 414 R Sao Lin Angk Prasrae 12 Partial

330 426 R Ou Sophal Angk Prasrae 20 Entire

331 333 L Kong Tharn Angk Prasrae 12 Partial

332 456 R Chan Sameon Angk Prasrae 136 Partial

333 369 L Vel Saruon Angk Prasrae 45 Entire

334 295 L Chem Sararn Angk Prasrae 32 Partial

335 351 L Kong Saroun Angk Prasrae 24 Entire

336 458 R Kheive Sarong Angk Prasrae 27 Entire

337 398 R Sors Romly Angk Prasrae 25 Partial

338 392 R Laorn Thy Angk Prasrae 24 Partial

339 335 L Mom Chourn Angk Prasrae 24 Partial

340 341 L Mao Nan Angk Prasrae 21 Partial

341 337 L Ou Cheng Angk Prasrae 16 Partial

342 430 R Owner not available Angk Prasrae 15 Partial

343 432 R Ouk Varn Angk Prasrae 15 Partial

344 349 L Mork Savart Angk Prasrae 10 Partial

345

Angk Prasrae Angk Prasrae 1850 48

346 327 L Kaeov Piset Angk Prasrae 6 20

347 434 R Mao Nan Angk Prasrae 20

Appendix 3

105



Residential (m

2)

Commercial (m

2)

Farmland (m


348 424 R Hao Vong Angk Prasrae 28

349 442 R Kong Tharn Angk Prasrae 20

350 331 L Chaom Mao Angk Prasrae 16

351 404 R Peaok Karith Angk Prasrae 15

352 410 R Eong Hong Angk Prasrae 13.5

353 446 R Pao Sapoun Angk Prasrae 12

354 317 R Mork Toch Angk Prasrae 12

355 358 R Prak Sareom Angk Prasrae 180

356 291 L Peong Vanna Angk Prasrae 150

357 343 L Nong Saly Angk Prasrae 100

358 329 L En Sarin Angk Prasrae 69

359 448 R Owner not available Angk Prasrae 66


361 293 L Owner not available Angk Prasrae 40

362 368 R Kim Yen Angk Prasrae 38


364 303 L Eaem Sokhom Angk Prasrae 28

365 299 L Paen Choun Angk Prasrae 27

366 339 L Ping Vanna Angk Prasrae 27


368 408 R Ngoy Nasim Angk Prasrae 26

369 396 R Oung Sokhom Angk Prasrae 25

370 420 R Hao Va Angk Prasrae 25

371 388 R Srey Kheang Angk Prasrae 24

372 412 R Orng Sokhoum Angk Prasrae 24

373 386 R Pol Porn Angk Prasrae 24



376 372 R Mao Kosal Angk Prasrae 20

Appendix 3

106



Residential (m

2)

Commercial (m

2)

Farmland (m


377 402 R Svaiy Eaom Angk Prasrae 20

378 364 R Heom Sakum Angk Prasrae 20

379 370 R Chea Sotheany Angk Prasrae 20

380 436 R Paen Lun Angk Prasrae 20

381 416 R Eaem Yorn Angk Prasrae 20

382 400 R Eang Sokhom Angk Prasrae 20

383 307 L Bal Sokheoun Angk Prasrae 18

384 440 R Ping Vanna Angk Prasrae 18

385 323 L Eng Khorn Angk Prasrae 16

386 428 R Pich Saran Angk Prasrae 16

387 418 R Hun Lei Angk Prasrae 16

388 454 R Cheang Two Angk Prasrae 16

389 422 R Chan Sombat Angk Prasrae 16

390 394 R Paen Chun Angk Prasrae 15

391 311 L Sao Noy Angk Prasrae 15

392 376 R Nong Peon Angk Prasrae 15

393 309 L Brak Chaort Angk Prasrae 15

394 313 L Ngoy Sina Angk Prasrae 15

395 325 L Saom Mun Angk Prasrae 15

396 444 R Charng Veay Angk Prasrae 15

397 305 L Oum Chang Angk Prasrae 14



400 452 R Gheam Chan Angk Prasrae 12.5

401 321 L Owner not available Angk Prasrae 12

402 345 L Nong Houy Angk Prasrae 12

403 450 R Koy Sat Angk Prasrae 12

404 438 R Maen Saleang Angk Prasrae 12

405 315 L Eaem Eourn Angk Prasrae 12

Appendix 3

107



Residential (m

2)

Commercial (m

2)

Farmland (m


406 406 R Keov Sokha Angk Prasrae 12

407 301 L Ou Cheng Angk Prasrae 12


409 380 R Laek Sreynourn Angk Prasrae 10

410 319 L Prak Rorn Angk Prasrae 8

411 297 L Owner not available Angk Prasrae 7.5

412 347 L Preab Sung Angk Prasrae 6

413 365 L Mean Senglone Andoung Pou 45 Partial

414 468 R Kaov Orn Andoung Pou 160 Partial

415 490 R Kem Saophea Andoung Pou 100 Partial

416 488 R Rouas Kao Andoung Pou 80 Partial

417 367 L Saom Chinda Andoung Pou 40 Entire

418 480 R Preab Somnang Andoung Pou 28 Partial

419 357 L Pruom Chorn Andoung Pou 15 Entire

420 355 L Meak Sokhourn Andoung Pou 90 Partial

421 472 R Chea Chanthy Andoung Pou 81 Entire

422 474 R Proum Saran Andoung Pou 48 Entire

423 359 L Pich Sapourn Andoung Pou 24 Entire

424 363 L Chab Dara Andoung Pou 15 Partial

425

Andoung Pou Andoung Pou 2540 60

426 476 R Pich Moneiy Andoung Pou 48

427 478 R Chab Savourn Andoung Pou 14

428 492 R Owner not available Andoung Pou 200

429 484 R Sek Saophea Andoung Pou 160

430 353 L Owner not available Andoung Pou 150


432 466 R Va Chean Andoung Pou 80

433 470 R Prak Dorn Andoung Pou 75

434 486 R Saom Sarin Andoung Pou 70

Appendix 3

108



Residential (m

2)

Commercial (m

2)

Farmland (m



436 482 R Van Saraen Andoung Pou 60

437 578 R Preab Chhuern Kampong Trach 57 Partial

438 435 L Va King Kampong Trach 8 Entire

439 391 L Chak Prom Kampong Trach 96 Partial

440 494 R Ma Kearithy Kampong Trach 90 Entire

441 371 L Prugh Norb Kampong Trach 60 Partial

442 379 L Ben Song Kampong Trach 48 Partial

443 594 R Ouk Saren Kampong Trach 37 Partial

444 506 R Rath Yol Kampong Trach 36 Partial

445 649 L Prom Sean Kampong Trach 30 Entire

446 643 L Sau Pin Kampong Trach 30 Entire

447 651 L Kong Sarun Kampong Trach 28 Entire

448 510 L Kong Thy Kampong Trach 27 Partial

449 361 L Sok Dy Kampong Trach 16 Entire

450 415 L Hei Ratna Kampong Trach 9 Entire

451 542 R Owner not available Kampong Trach 6 Partial

452 552 R Owner not available Kampong Trach 4.5 Partial




456 375 L Ted Borarnd Kampong Trach Partial

457 540 R Chue Oun Kampong Trach 47.5 Partial

458 573 L Bras eang Kampong Trach 28.5 Partial

459 671 L Owner not available Kampong Trach 150 Partial

460 655 L Kert Siruern Kampong Trach 105 Entire


462 405 L Yan Chouch Kampong Trach 52 Partial

463 417 L Owner not available Kampong Trach 47.5 Partial

Appendix 3

109



Residential (m

2)

Commercial (m

2)

Farmland (m


464 524 R Ghean Sovany Kampong Trach 40 Entire

465 669 L Hon Nuern Kampong Trach 32 Partial

466 520 R Paen Saroun Kampong Trach 24 Partial


468 526 R Kem San Kampong Trach 20 Entire

469 617 L Kim Sopheap Kampong Trach 18 Partial

470 539 L Luerng man Kampong Trach 17 Partial

471 383 L Owner not available Kampong Trach 16 Entire

472 605 L Sok Chay Kampong Trach 13.5 Partial

473 571 L Chea Sophan Kampong Trach 12.5 Partial


475 389 L Phat Savat Kampong Trach 12 Entire

476 556 R Teav Kun Kampong Trach 12 Partial


478 411 L Owner not available Kampong Trach 4.5 Partial

479 611 L En Yaen Kampong Trach 98

480 574 R Chea Youy Kampong Trach 63

481 479 L Owner not available Kampong Trach 5 48

482 597 L Chhen Von Kampong Trach 43

483 499 L Tep Chun Kampong Trach 36

484 536 R Seng Huern Kampong Trach 34

485

Kampong Trach Kampong Trach 30

486 465 L Owner not available Kampong Trach 23

487 547 L Nut Sim Kampong Trach 22.5

488 545 L Sorn Titouny Kampong Trach 20.3




492 439 L Hong Tei Kampong Trach 18

Appendix 3

110



Residential (m

2)

Commercial (m

2)

Farmland (m


493 565 L Doung Savuern Kampong Trach 15

494 538 R Kem Sokom Kampong Trach 80

495 558 R Teav Vanna Kampong Trach 42


497 589 L Koev An Kampong Trach 25

498 505 L Leat Chuern Kampong Trach 25

499 601 L Va Tav Kampong Trach 22

500 584 R Owner not available Kampong Trach 20

501 615 L Mau Yon Kampong Trach 18

502 537 L Sok Oun Kampong Trach 18

503 433 L Chan Tha Kampong Trach 15

504 663 L Sok Ouk Kampong Trach 15

505 587 L Mey Chanton Kampong Trach 14

506 579 L Ly Kerng Kampong Trach 13.5

507 566 R Kong Samagon Kampong Trach 13.5

508 445 L Haem Sokha Kampong Trach 12

509 407 L Chan Sokha Kampong Trach 6

510 512 R Hem Yut Kampong Trach 150

511 409 L Kim Ron Kampong Trach 112



514 385 L Merng Sarith Kampong Trach 63

515 529 L Mao Kead Kampong Trach 63



518 421 L Chan Bonthuern Kampong Trach 56




Appendix 3

111



Residential (m

2)

Commercial (m

2)

Farmland (m


522 509 L ACLEDA BANK Kampong Trach 40

523 580 R Soam Lon Kampong Trach 40

524 508 R Ork Chantha Kampong Trach 39

525 518 R Mom Ty Kampong Trach 36

526 453 L Chea Vantha Kampong Trach 36

527 623 L Kem Yat Kampong Trach 35

528 635 L Kuy Pech Kampong Trach 34



531 657 L Chay Savut Kampong Trach 33

532 500 R Ngaed Chan Kampong Trach 32

533 534 R Luern Man Kampong Trach 32


535 498 R Meong Sarith Kampong Trach 30

536 485 L Pork Sovana Kampong Trach 30

537 516 R Bras Sokon Kampong Trach 30

538 645 L Sam Lan Kampong Trach 30

539 401 L Toch Khorn Kampong Trach 30

540 593 L Chreong Sam Kampong Trach 27

541 483 L Chy Sophaon Kampong Trach 27

542 576 R Va Savat Kampong Trach 27

543 569 L Saom Manen Kampong Trach 27








Appendix 3

112



Residential (m

2)

Commercial (m

2)

Farmland (m




553 521 L Yoak Sovan Kampong Trach 25

554 598 R Sao Lam Kampong Trach 25

555 561 L An Pech Kampong Trach 25

556 563 L Tep Kampong Trach 25



559 562 R Chhoa Soaphea Kampong Trach 24

560 532 R Luerng Keav Kampong Trach 24

561 543 L E Ratnak Kampong Trach 22.5

562 423 L Chhom Phal Kampong Trach 22.5

563 441 L Chen Suern Kampong Trach 22.5

564 554 R Teav Pouy Kampong Trach 21.3

565 568 R Srey Ta Kampong Trach 21


567 511 L Korean Centre Kampong Trach 20










577 590 L Sim Vonghan Kampong Trach 20

578 559 L Sterng Sachea Kampong Trach 20

579 612 R Em Savon Kampong Trach 20

Appendix 3

113



Residential (m

2)

Commercial (m

2)

Farmland (m


580 339 L Lueok Pov Kampong Trach 20

581 451 L Dong Molykhun Kampong Trach 20

582 533 L Ou Sinun Kampong Trach 20

583 437 L Maen Kong Kampong Trach 18

584 609 L Dom Tara Kampong Trach 18

585 613 L Pech Agon Kampong Trach 18

586 585 L Khun Bolyna Kampong Trach 18

587 397 L Braeng Vanny Kampong Trach 18

588 528 R Chhem Chanra Kampong Trach 18

589 549 L Kem Yet Kampong Trach 18

590 463 L Yu Somart Kampong Trach 18

591 591 L Ngou Mao Kampong Trach 18

592 517 L Tun Sokom Kampong Trach 18

593 583 L Hei Cha Kampong Trach 18

594 603 L Chay May Kampong Trach 18


596 403 L Va Seng Kampong Trach 16

597 427 L Dok Vang Kampong Trach 16

598 431 L Ou Rathana Kampong Trach 16

599 377 L Chan Keong Kampong Trach 16


601 560 R Kem Nat Kampong Trach 15

602 503 L Kim Sokha Kampong Trach 15

603 497 L Kaem Agon Kampong Trach 15

604 513 L Meas Vantheon Kampong Trach 15

605 493 L Kau Sophal Kampong Trach 15

606 570 R Sterng Yan Kampong Trach 15

607 515 L Mi Rath Kampong Trach 15

608 531 L Sok Chea Kampong Trach 15

Appendix 3

114



Residential (m

2)

Commercial (m

2)

Farmland (m


609 491 L Bras Salout Kampong Trach 15

610 553 L Cheom Thourn Kampong Trach 15


612 381 L Ban Kadin Kampong Trach 14

613 457 L Pov Peark Kampong Trach 14

614 581 L Teb Mao Kampong Trach 14

615 514 R Kim Veasna Kampong Trach 14

616 567 L Reach Tak Kampong Trach 14

617 413 L Duerk Saron Kampong Trach 13.5

618 607 L Kong Samagon Kampong Trach 13.5

619 637 L Oum Sophea Kampong Trach 13.5

620 455 L Pech Savy Kampong Trach 13.5

621 595 L Ly Sokhom Kampong Trach 13.5


623 599 L Kong Yong Kampong Trach 13



626 496 R Hun Ratha Kampong Trach 12

627 606 R Put Rasmey Kampong Trach 12

628 596 R Chen Sopheak Kampong Trach 12






634 522 R Seng Rany Kampong Trach 10

635 530 R Ouk Sarorn Kampong Trach 10

636 577 L Oum Sakhurn Kampong Trach 10

637 582 R Kong Tol Kampong Trach 10

Appendix 3

115



Residential (m

2)

Commercial (m

2)

Farmland (m


638 467 L Ou Angy Kampong Trach 10

639 541 L Va Seng Kampong Trach 10

640 551 L Chen Salon Kampong Trach 10

641 447 L Ham Huern Kampong Trach 9


643 373 L Leang vuthy Kampong Trach 8


645 602 R Owner not available Kampong Trach 5.5



648 487 L Ream Setha Kampong Trach 5

649 501 L Luerng Minh Kampong Trach 5

650 449 L Ouk Thanin Kampong Trach 4.5

651 550 R Kong Vannak Kampong Trach

652 667 L Seng Samon Kampong Trach

653 689 L Koev Yan Amkpil 22.5 Partial

654 697 L Owner not available Amkpil 90 Entire

655 622 R Ti Savon Amkpil 83 Partial

656 681 L Owner not available Amkpil 25 Partial




660 693 L Owner not available Amkpil 12 Entire


662

Amkpil Amkpil 410

663 624 R Seng Lan Amkpil 48

664 691 L Sou Sabol Amkpil 42

665 620 R Keb Mil Amkpil 30

666 687 L Meav Yin Amkpil 18.8

Appendix 3

116



Residential (m

2)

Commercial (m

2)

Farmland (m


667 685 L Ouch Kemsean Amkpil 17.5

668 701 L Kun Set Andoung Trabaek 14 Partial

669 703 L Prom Seng Andoung Trabaek 16

670

Andoung Trabaek Andoung Trabaek

671 630 R Pung Sarim Krabau 270 Entire

672 626 R Ream Phanna Krabau 1200 Entire

673 709 L Niy Chamnang Krabau 600 Entire

674 628 R Ream Mab Krabau 86 Partial

675 707 L Kat Sitha Krabau 12

676

'Krabau Krabau

Appendix 4

117

Summary of Pre-IOL Survey Consultations Held (South) Agenda:

Introduce purpose of the project and road section and what TA is all about

Introduce survey team and date for conduct IOL and SES

Why conducted IOL and ESE?

Cut off date

Minimize impact of the project

No Road

Section Date of Meeting

Location of Meeting (District)

Number of Participants Concerns Raised by the People

1 NR - 314D

20 May 2011

Svay Tep 13

When this road will started construction?

They proposed to construct this road as soon as possible,

Proposed to build drainage along road side,

Proposed to compensation for fruit trees and other threes

make clear between compensation price for rural and urban land area,

2 NR - 314D

21 May 2011

Kampong Ro 20

make clear between compensation price for rural, urban land area and land near the Vietname Border

proposed minimize impact of the project for urban area


During relocated or moved back of structure propose to project to inform them at least two week first.

3 NR - 13 21 May 2011

Rom Duol 43

proposed minimize impact of the project for urban area especially at Dumduol town

If people that affected 100% of their land affected, where should their live?


All of properties that affected, the project will compensation or not?

How price are compensation?

4 NR - 13 22 May 2011

Romeas Haek

21

Propose to the project to rebuild drainage for them, because they just collected money with all of APs to build that drainage, don’t be collected the money again, they have no money.

I am landless, how should the project solve problem for me?

When this road will started

Appendix 4

118

No Road



Number of Participants Concerns Raised by the People

construction?

He affected his house 100%, he proposed to project to pay for relocated his house is possible.

5 NR - 13 24 May 2011

Kamchay Mear

76

During the first construction nearly two year ago, the authorities proposed to contributed his land for road construction, during this time, he propose suitable price for compensation.


How many meters of ROW for our road NR-13

6 NR - 13 25 May 2011

Svay Rieng 26


Don’t excavated land in ROW to used for road construction, should get from borrow pit far from the road ROW.

Appendix 4

119

Minutes Meeting at Svay Tep District (South)

- Date: Friday, 20/ May, 2011 - Place: District Center - Time: 2h00 to 3h 15

Participants

1-Mr. Penh Pha (Deputy Governor of Svay Tep District)

2- Mr. Romeo Clito( International Resettlement Consultant) 3- Mr. Sao Primarak (MPWT) 4- Seang Bora (Local Resettlement Consultant) 5- Koung Sary (Chief office of district) 6- Hay Chan Nak (Deputy Chief of Admin of district)

AGENDA

1- Provides the Purpose of project and Project Location along NR 314D and NR13 2- Resettlement Introduction 3- Conduct IOL 3- Conduct SES 5- Time table for field work 6- Cutoff Date 7- Entitlements of Affected people 8- Post-IOL consultation

A- Mr. Sao Primarak (Staff of MPWT) 1. Explain what the TA is all about:

The Government of Cambodia has requested the Asian Development Bank (ADB) project preparatory technical assistance (TA) to prepare the Provincial Roads Improvement Project. Among others, the project aims to rehabilitate NR 314D from Prosot to the border of Vietnam at Prey Var-Mocva, 25 km; construct a new cross border facility (CBF) at Prey Var-Mocva; NR 13 connecting NR 8 and NR1, between Komchay Mear 65 km; NR53, which traverse Kampong Chhnang and Kampong Speu provinces, we need time to study more after submit to Government and ADB for approved

B- Mr. Seang Bora( Local Resettlement Consultant) 1. Thank the participants for coming and the local officials for facilitating the holding of the

meeting today. 2. The members of the survey team will start to measurement tomorrow afternoon from Svay

Teap to Kampong Ro District, So I would like to inform you all of authorities to help and inform to all affect people along the road site to participate with our team to conduct IOL and SES to measure size of impact before road construction. As you know the project successful when have participated from authorities and people

3. Why Conduct IOL and SES? because, we want to identify impacts from land acquisition and make an assessment of eligible people and living life of the people along the project site like,

Appendix 4

120

Income and Expense for their each household and find out Vulnerable group like Elderly, Widow, handicap and income under poverty line etc.

4. Cutoff date: We would like to inform to authorities during IOL is the cutoff date by tell to all people by no need to build new houses, Shops stalls in COI.

5. Middle of June 2011 International Resettlement Consultant will come here again to public consultation again

C- Deputy of District Referring to ideas for MPWT’s officer and Resettlement Consultant provided all of the

information, he would like to inform to all of authorities related to the project site to participate strongly with this actions to get successfully, and he provide this to commune head to repot some of structures and fences etc,

The Commune Head of Prasot Prasot cmmune has 7500m from Prasot commune to Kampong Ro district is not so much affected with structures, affected agriculture only

- Affected some Fences and 13 structures and severely affected 3 structures - Affected with 4 villages

1. Tuol Trabaek village: affected with 24 stalls/Shops 2. Pothy Vuong village: affected 5 stalls/shops and 5 fences, 3. Prey Ruodol village: 3 relocated structures and 1 gateway Pagoda 4. Ang Tamouk village: affected with 1 gateway of pagoda

E- Number Commune and Village at Svay Teab District along NR-314

District Commune Village Remarks

Svay Teap

Kandieng Reay Prasoutr Ti Muoy

Prasoutr Ti Pi

Prasout

Angk Ta Mouk

Prey Rumduol

Pou Vong

Attendants List

Province: Svay Rieng, District: Svay Tep, Commune: Kandeang Reay, Village:

No.

Name

Sex

Position

/ Organization/Village

Sign or Thumb Print

1 Romeo Clito M Inter- Consultant KCI

2 Sao Primarak M MPWT

3 Seang Bora M Local Consultant KCI

4 Phenh Pha M Deputy of District Svay Teap

5 Koung Sary M District officer Chief of office

6 Men Saran M District officer Chief of Admin

7 Hay Chan Nak

M District officer Deputy Chief of Admin

8 Gnoun Sat F Commune head Kandeang Reay

9 Ouk Pak M Commune head Prasot village

10 Sek Saline M Village head Prey Rumdol village

Appendix 4

121

Writing by Local Resettlement consultant

Mr. Seang Bora

11 Am San M Village head Tuol Trabaek village

12 Phouk Savaen

M Village head Prasot Pir village

13 Mok Savun M Village head Prasot Muy village

Appendix 4

122

Minutes Meeting at Kampong Ro District (South)

- Date: Saturday, 21/ May, 2011 - Place: District Center of Kampong Ro - Time: 9h00

Participants

1- Mr. Pich Sovan (Chief Governor of district) 2- Mr. Romeo Clito( International Resettlement Consultant) 3- Seang Bora (Local Resettlement Consultant) 4- Mr. Sok Sam Ol (Chief Admin of Kampong Ro district)

AGENDA

1- Provides the Purpose of project and Project Location along NR 314D and

NR13 2- Resettlement Introduction 3- Conduct IOL 3- Conduct SES 5- Time table for field work 6- Cutoff Date 7- Entitlements of Affected people 8- Vulnerable grou

A- Chief of District

Report name of District, Communes and village along NR-314 and Participants during this meeting and transfer purpose of meeting to Mr. Seang Bora (Local Resettlement Consultant) and Mr. Romeo B. Clito (International Resettlement Consultant)

B- Mr. Seang Bora( Local Resettlement Consultant) Thank the participants for coming and the local officials for facilitating the holding of the meeting

today. 6. Explain what the TA is all about:

The Government of Cambodia has requested the Asian Development Bank (ADB) project preparatory technical assistance (TA) to prepare the Provincial Roads Improvement Project. Among others, the project aims to rehabilitate NR 314D from Prosot to the border of Vietnam at Prey Var-Mocva, 25 km; construct a new cross border facility (CBF) at Prey Var-Mocva; NR 13 connecting NR 8 and NR1, between Komchay Mear 65 km;

NR53, which traverse Kampong Chhnang and Kampong Speu provinces, we need time to study more after submit to Government and ADB.

2. The members of the survey team will conducting measurement from Svay Teap to Kampong Ro District, So I would like to inform you all of authorities to help and provide this information to all affect people along the road site to participate with our team to conduct

Appendix 4

123

IOL and SES to measure size of impact before road construction. As you know the project successful when have participated from authorities and people and all APs must be clear what assets, others assets or lands that affected with the project after thumb print or sign agreement with the team survey. The project needed 10m from road existing centerline for each site, total is 20 m.

3. Why Conduct IOL and SES? because, we want to get legible and eligible people and living life of the people along the project site like, Income and Expense for their each household and find out Vulnerable group like Elderly, Widow, handicap and income under poverty line etc. especially, find out that their own assets for each affected household that affected by road construction project.

4. Cutoff date: We would like to inform to authorities during IOL is the cutoff date by tell to all people no need to build new houses, Shops stalls in COI.

7. Middle of June 2011 International Resettlement Consultant will come here again to public consultation again with affected people and authorities along the project site.

C- Chief of District Referring to Resettlement Consultant provided all of the information, he would like to

inform to all of authorities related to the project site to participate strongly with this actions to get successfully, and he provide to commune head to report some of structures and fences and to find out how many people that affected inside the COI and that assts that all people lose.

Number Commune and Village at Kampong Ro District along NR-314D

District Commune Village

Kampong Ro

1 Pras Ponlea

1- Pring Chrum

2- Trapeang Lun

3- Tradaet

2 Prey Thom 1- Prey Sakom

3 Nhor

1- Trapeang Chhlonh

2- Ro Commercial area (around PK: 16+900)

3- Svay Anat

4- Trapeang Treav

4 khsaet 1- Resay Orm

5 Thmey

1- Oh Commercial area( around

PK:20+600)

2- Prey Voir

5 11

Attendants List

Province: Svay Rieng, District Kampong Ro, Commune, Village:

No. Name Sex Position Organization/Village

1 Pich Sovan M Chief of District Kampong Ro



Appendix 4

124


Mr. Seang Bora

4 Sok Sam Ol M Chief admin of District Kampong Ro

5 Prach Koung M Commune head Ksaet

6 Real Sear M Village head Nhor

7 Sao Savaen M Village head Thmey

8 Sam Sorn M Village head Nhor

9 Noun Phal M Village head Nhor

10 Phae Sarorn M Village head Pring Chrum

11 Kim Rithy M Commune head Prash Ponlea

12 Hing Pae M Village head Tra Baek

13 Chea Young M Deputy of commune Thmey

14 Rot Soueng F Commune head Prey Thom

15 Some Hang M Commune head Nhor

16 Som Sam At M Village head Oh

17 Sao Samaen M Village head Ay anak

18 Long Sary M Village head Trapeang Run

19 Chan Yong M Village head Resay Orm

20 Nhim Pa M Village head

21

22

Appendix 4

125

Minutes Meeting at Rum Duol District (South)

- Date: Saturday, 21/ May, 2011 - Place: District Center of Rum Duol - Time: 2h00

Participants

1- Mr. Chan Heng (Deputy Governor of Rum Duol district) 2- Mr. Romeo Clito( International Resettlement Consultant) 2- Mr. Seang Bora (Local Resettlement Consultant 3- Communes Chief, Commune Councils and villages head and affected people

(APs)

AGENDA

1- Provides the Purpose of project and Project Location along NR 314D and NR13

2- Resettlement Introduction 3- Conduct IOL 3- Conduct SES 5- Time table for field work 6- Cutoff Date 7- Entitlements of Affected people 8- Vulnerable group

A- Dputy of District Report name of District, Communes and village along NR-13 in Rum Duol District area and

Participants during this meeting and transfer purpose of meeting to Mr. Seang Bora (Local Resettlement Consultant) and Mr. Romeo B. Clito (International Resettlement Consultant)

B- Mr. Seang Bora( Local Resettlement Consultant) Thanks you very much for Mr. Romeo B. Clito (International Resettlement Consultant) that has

present, Deputy of district, Chief of Communes, Village head and all of the people that participated for this meeting today.

8. Explain what the TA is all about:

The Government of Cambodia has requested the Asian Development Bank (ADB) project preparatory technical assistance (TA) to prepare the Provincial Roads Improvement Project. Among others, the project aims to rehabilitate NR 314D from Prosot to the border of Vietnam at Prey Var-Mocva, 25 km; construct a new cross border facility (CBF) at Prey Var-Mocva; NR 13 connecting NR 8 and NR1, between Komchay Mear 65 km; NR53, which traverse Kampong Chhnang and Kampong Speu provinces, we need time to study more after submit to Government and ADB for approved after construction.

Appendix 4

126

2. The members of the survey team will conducting measurement road number 314Dfrom Svay Tep to Kampong Ro District and, will to conducted Rum Duol district around between next week, So I would like to inform you all of authorities to help and provide this information to all affect people along the road site to participate with our team to conduct IOL and SES to measure size of impact before road construction. As you know the project successful when have participated from authorities and people and all APs must be clear what assets, others assets or lands that affected with the project after thumb print or sign agreement with the team survey. The project needed 10m from road existing centerline for each site, total is 20 m.

3. Why Conduct IOL and SES? because, we want to get legible and eligible people and living life of the people along the project site like, Income and Expense for their each household and find out Vulnerable group like Elderly, Widow, handicap and income under poverty line etc. especially, find out that their own assets for each affected household that affected by road construction project.



C- Deputy of District Referring to Resettlement Consultant provided all of the information, he would like to


Number Communes and Villages at Rom Duol district along NR-13

District Commune Village

Rum Duol

1- Chork 1- Kampong Chork Commercial area(Pk: 7+600)

2- Prey Keav

2- Sang Ke

1- Kok Sramor

2- Ta Naeng

3- Puon

4- Ta chou

3- Chrung Popel

1- Trapeang Kros

2- Trapeang Kraet

3- Prah Ang Keo

4_Kroch

4- Kampong Ampil 1- Tasork

2- Trapeang damrey

4 12

Appendix 4

127

Attendants List

Province: Svay Rieng, District Rum Duol, Commune: Village:


1 Pich Heng M Village head Chork

2 Chet Chan Thorn M Village head Prey Keav

3 Koeng Ny F Village head Kok Sramor

4 Park Sa Khorn M Village head Tanaeng

5 Ros Seay M Village head Pon

6 Mork Chhorn M Village head Tachou

7 Prum Vath M Village head Trapeang Krous

8 Ma Sarin M Village head Trapeang Kraet

9 Sao Saphon M Village head Kroch

10 Men Bun thoeurn M Village head Prah Ang Keo

11 Keo Reth M Village head Trapeang Damrey

12 Sor Va M Village head Tasork

13 Ou Saval M Commune head Sang Kae

14 Reach Saphon M Commune head Kampong Ampil

15 Souce Pheng M Commune head Chrong Popel

16 Oung Sarorn M People Prey Keav

17 So Navy M People Prey Keav

18 Chen Raem People

19 Chin Phaly M People Prey Keav

20 San Chhorvorn M People Prey Keav

21 Loek Siyat M People Prey Keav

22 Sao Sarorn People Prey Keav

23 En Vanna People Prey Keav

24 Chet Chan Thorn Village head Prey Keav

25 Sear Lakhana People Prey Keav

26 En Phear Village head Svay Roung

27 Keo Boraen People Prey Keav

28 Kim vanna People Prey Keav

29 Kim Boraen People Prey Keav

30 Pov Sinareth People Prey Keav

31 Mey salim People Prey Keav

32 Men Sitha People Prey Keav

33 Em Da People Chork

34 Chea Soklida People Chork

35 Oung Nary People Chork

36 Sim Sithoeurn People Prey Keav

Appendix 4

128

Writing by Local Resettlement consultan

Mr. Seang Bora

37 Men Sam At People Prey Keav

38 OU Dany People Prey Keav

39 Pheng Sophat People Chork

40 Toch Sinat People Chork

41 Ouk Kunthea People Chork

42 Has Neang People Chork

43 Pen Sam An Commune Council Kampong Chork

Appendix 4

129

Minutes Meeting at Romeas Haek District

- Date: Saturday, 22/ May, 2011 - Place: District Center - Time: 9h00

Participants

1- Mr. Hen Sokun (Chief of district Governor) 2- Mr. Romeo Clito( International Resettlement Consultant) 3- Seang Bora (Local Resettlement Consultant) 4- Pen Savorn (district Officer) 5- Men Samoeurn (district Officer) 6- Commune Chiefs, commune council and all of village head

AGENDA


NR13 2- Resettlement Introduction 3- Conduct IOL 3- Conduct SES 5- Time table for field work 6- Cutoff Date 7- Entitlements of Affected people 8- Vulnerable group

A- Mr. Hen Sokun (Chief of district Governor)

Report name of District, Communes and village along NR-13 from Rum Duol District border to border of Kamchay Mear and Participants during this meeting (see attach files ), and transfer purpose of meeting to Mr. Seang Bora (Local Resettlement Consultant) and Mr. Romeo B. Clito (International Resettlement Consultant)

B- Mr. Seang Bora( Local Resettlement Consultant) Thanks you very much for Mr. Romeo B. Clito (International Resettlement Consultant) that has

present, Deputy of district, Chief of Communes, Village head and all of the people that participated for this meeting today. And, I would like inform the purpose of the meeting and project introduction as following:


The Government of Cambodia has requested the Asian Development Bank (ADB) project preparatory technical assistance (TA) to prepare the Provincial Roads Improvement Project. Among others, the project aims to rehabilitate NR 314D from Prosot to the border of Vietnam at Prey Var-Mocva, 25 km; construct a new cross border facility (CBF) at Prey Var-Mocva; NR 13 connecting NR 8 and NR1, between Komchay Mear 65 km;

NR53, which traverse Kampong Chhnang and Kampong Speu provinces, we

Appendix 4

130

need time to study more after submit to Government and ADB for approved after construction.

2. The members of the survey team will conducting measurement road number 314Dfrom Svay

Tep to Kampong Ro District and, will to conducted Rum Duol district and after conducted at Romeas Haek district around between next week and also Kamchay Mear district at NR-8, So I would like to inform you all of authorities to help and provide this information to all affect people along the road site to participate with our team to conduct IOL and SES to measure size of impact before road construction. As you know the project successful when have participated from authorities and people and all APs must be clear what assets, others assets or lands that affected with the project after thumb print or sign agreement with the team survey. The project needed 10m from road existing centerline for each site, total is 20 m.

3. Why Conduct IOL and SES? because, we want to get legible and eligible people and living

life of the people along the project site like, Income and Expense for their each household and find out Vulnerable group like Elderly, Widow, handicap and income under poverty line etc. especially, find out that their own assets for each affected household that affected by road construction project.



C- Deputy of District Referring to Resettlement Consultant provided all of the information, he would like to


Number Commune and Village at Romeas Haek District along NR_13

District Commune Village Others

Romeas Haek

1- Angpra Sre

1- Samroung Commercial area

2- Trapeang Rumdenh

3- Thnal Peam

2- Andong Po

1- Bos Koki

2- Trapeang Thbal

3- Trapeang Chor

4- Trapeang Banteay Commercial area

5- Arak Svay

3- kampong Trach

1- Chong Oh

2- Ta Trav

3- Kampong Trach Commercial area

4- Amkpil

1- Touek Vil

2- Trapeang Prey

3- Ta Mao

Appendix 4

131


4- Trapeang Popel

5- Ampil

6- Troak

5- Trorse 1- Mony Proeksa

2- Voat

6- Andong Trabaek 1- Trapeang Smach

2- Andong Trabaek

6 Communes 21Villages

Attendants List

Province: Svay Rieng, District Romeas_Haek, Commune: , Village:


Mr. Seang Bora

No.

Name

Sex

Position


1 Hen Sokun M Deputy Chief of District Romeas Haek



4 Pov Savonng M Commune head Trorse

5 Pov Seap M Village head Andong Po

6 Koung Vaet M Commune Council 2 Andong Trabaek

7 Koung Sok M Commune Council 2 Ampil

8 Soeng Sarorn F Commune Council Ampil

9 Prach Yim M Village head Trorse

10 Mom Sorn M Commune head Andong Po

11 Ros Phan M Village head Arak Svay

12 Keo Rim M Village head Trapeang Rum Denh

13 Ouk Van M Commune head Ang Prasre

14 Tep Chan Savuth M Village head Ang Prasre

15 Chan Samoeurn M Village head Ang Prasre

16 Chan Saban M Village head Ang Prasre

17 Moek Moung M Village head Vat

18 Pen Oeurn M Village head Trapeang Smach

19 Korng Bunthoeurn M Village head Andong Trabaek

20 Pen Savorn M District Officer Romeas Haek

21 Men Samoeurn M District Officer Romeas Haek

22

Appendix 4

132

Minutes Meeting at Kamchay Mear District

- Date: Saturday, 24/ May, 2011 - Place: Veal Smach Village - Time: 2h00

Participants

1- Mr. Yaeng Cham (Commune council of Krabao) 2- Mr. Yat Yorn( district Public Works and Transport) 3- Seang Bora (Local Resettlement Consultant) 4- Commune councils , village heads and Affected people (APs)

AGENDA


NR13 2- Resettlement Introduction 3- Conduct IOL 3- Conduct SES 5- Time table for field work 6- Cutoff Date 7- Entitlements of Affected people 8- Vulnerable group

A- Chief of district Public Work and Transport

Had confirm to all participants about the purpose of meeting and after that Commune head had Report name of District, Communes and village along NR-13 in Kamchay Mear District from border of Romeas Haek to NR 08 affected with one commune and two villages: namely, Kra Bao Commune, 1, Thbong Vat Village, 2, Veal Smarch Thmey Village, to Participants during this meeting and transfer purpose of meeting to Mr. Seang Bora (Local Resettlement Consultant)

B- Mr. Seang Bora( Local Resettlement Consultant)

First, I would like to say thanks you very much for Chief of district Public Work and Transport , Commune head that has present that had arrange meeting today, thanks for all village head Village head and all of the people that participated for this meeting today.


The Government of Cambodia has requested the Asian Development Bank (ADB) project preparatory technical assistance (TA) to prepare the Provincial Roads Improvement Project. Among others, the project aims to rehabilitate NR 314D from Prosot to the border of Vietnam at Prey Var-Mocva, 25 km; construct a new cross border facility (CBF) at Prey Var-Mocva; NR 13 connecting NR 8 and NR1, between Komchay Mear 65 km; NR53, which traverse Kampong Chhnang and Kampong Speu provinces, we

Appendix 4

133

need time to study more after submit to Government and ADB for approved after construction.

2. The members of the survey team will conducting measurement road number 314Dfrom

Svay Tep to Kampong Ro District and, will to conducted Rum Duol district , Romeas Haek and will arrived Kamchay Mear District around next week, So I would like to inform you all of authorities and people along the road side to help and provide this information to all others affect people to participate with our team to conduct IOL and SES to measure size of impact after road construction. As you know the project successful when have participated from authorities and people and all APs should be understand the purpose of the project. The project needed 10m from centerline of existing road for each site, total is 20 m. so, all of properties/ assets/lands/ trees and other assets will collected during team survey conduct OL and SES

3. Why Conduct IOL and SES? because, we want to find out legible and eligible people and

living life of the people along the project site like, Income and Expense for their each household and find out Vulnerable group like Elderly, Widow, handicap and income under poverty line etc. especially, find out that their own assets for each affected household that affected by road construction project.

4. Cutoff date:

We would like to inform to authorities and participants and others affected people along the road side during IOL and SES is the days for cutoff date by tell to all people no need to build new houses, Shops stalls and others structures in COI.

5. Middle of June 2011 International Resettlement Consultant will come here again to conduct the public consultation meeting again with affected people and authorities along the project site.

C- Chief of commune Referring to Resettlement Consultant provided all of the information, he would like to

inform to all of authorities related to the project site especially, Village head to participate strongly with this actions to get successfully, and he provide to village head to report some of structures and fences and to find out how many people that affected inside the COI and assts that all people loss.

Number Commune and Villages at Kamchay Mear District along NR-13


Svay Rieng 1- Kra Bao

1- Thbong Vat

2- Veal Smach Thmey

1- Communes 2 Villages

Appendix 4

134

Attendants List Province: Svay Rieng, District: Kamchay Mear, Commune: Village:

Note:76 people participated during that meeting (see Pictures attachment) Writing by Local Resettlement consultant

Mr. Seang Bora

No.

Name

Sex

Position




4 Yat Yorn M Public Work of District Kamchay Mear

5 Yaeng Cham M Commune Council Kra Bao

6 Sao Sonay M Commune Council Kra Bao

7 Teap Run M Village head Veal Smach

8 Heng SamOn F Village head Thbong Vat

9

Appendix 4

135

Minutes Meeting at Kamchay Mear District

- Date: Saturday, 25/ May, 2011 - Place: Baek Ronose Village (along NR-13) - Time: 9h00 AM

Participants

1- Mr. Chhiv Sarorn (Deputy Municipal of Svay Rieng) 2- Mr. Choup Chanrithy (Community Development Town) 3- Mr. Seang Bora (Local Resettlement Consultant)

4- Mr. Sin Yong (Chief ofCommune of Sangkhor)

AGENDA

1- Provides the Purpose of project and Project Location along NR 314D and NR13

2- Resettlement Introduction 3- Conduct IOL 3- Conduct SES 5- Time table for field work 6- Cutoff Date 7- Entitlements of Affected people 8- Vulnerable group

A- Deputy Mulniciple of Svay Rieng Town

He had confirm to all participants about the purpose of meeting and after that Commune head had report name of District, Communes and village along NR-13 in Svay Rieng District from NR- 1 to border of Rum Duol district affected with one commune and 6 villages: namely, Sang Khor Commune, 1, Thmey Village, 2, Baek Ronorse Village, 3, Thlork, 4 Preah Tonle, 5 Po Phlear, 6 Aknakot village to Participants during this meeting and transfer purpose of meeting to Mr. Seang Bora (Local Resettlement Consultant)

B- Mr. Seang Bora( Local Resettlement Consultant)

First, I would like to say thanks you very much for Deputy Mulniciple of Svay Rieng Town, Public Work and Transport , Commune head that has present and arranged meeting today, thanks for all village head Village head and all of lady and gentlemen that have participated for this meeting today. I would like to introduce purpose of meeting as follow:


The Government of Cambodia has requested the Asian Development Bank (ADB) project preparatory technical assistance (TA) to prepare the Provincial Roads Improvement Project. Among others, the project aims to rehabilitate NR 314D from Prosot to the border of Vietnam at Prey Var-Mocva, 25 km; construct a new cross border facility (CBF) at Prey Var-Mocva; NR 13 connecting NR 8 and NR1,

Appendix 4

136

between Komchay Mear 65 km; NR53, which traverse Kampong Chhnang and Kampong Speu provinces, we need time to study more after submit to Government and ADB for approved after construction.

2. Why Conduct IOL and SES?

Because, we want to find out legible and eligible people and living life of the people along the project site like, Income and Expense for their each household and find out Vulnerable group like Elderly, Widow, handicap and income under poverty line etc. especially, find out that their own assets for each affected household that affected by road construction project.

3. Cutoff date:

We would like to inform to authorities and participants and others affected people along the road side during IOL and SES is the days for cutoff date by tell to all people no need to build new houses, Shops stalls and others structures in COI.

4. The members of the survey team will conducting measurement road number 314Dfrom Svay Tep to Kampong Ro District and, will to conducted Rum Duol district , Romeas Haek and will arrived Kamchay Mear District around next week, So I would like to inform you all of authorities and people along the road side to help and provide this information to all others affect people to participate with our team to conduct IOL and SES to measure size of impact after road construction. As you know the project successful when have participated from authorities and people and all APs should be understand the purpose of the project. The project needed 10m from centerline of existing road for each site, total is 20 m. so, all of properties, assets, lands, trees and other assets will collected during team survey conduct IOL and SES

5. Middle of June 2011 International Resettlement Consultant will come here again to

conduct the public consultation meeting again with affected people and authorities along the project site.

C- Deputy Mulniciple of Svay Rieng Town Referring to Resettlement Consultant provided all of the information, he would like to

inform to all of authorities related to the project site especially, Village head to participate strongly with this actions to get successfully, and he provide to village head to report some of structures and fences and to find out how many people that affected inside the COI and assts that all people loss. And don’t be have more structures like : Shops, Stalls, Houses or other structures build in COI or ROW from to date, if have some build temporary structures should have agreement from authorities and agreement between owners of structures and authorities, when Government need land in ROW, they will moved out by no compensation.

Appendix 4

137

6- Number Commune and Village at Svay Rieng District along NR_13


Svay Rieng 1- Sangkhor

1- Thmey

2- Bak Ronorse

3- Thlork

4- Preah Tonle

5- Po Phlear

6- Akna Kot

1- Communes 6 Villages

7- Attendants List


Mr. Seang Bora

No.

Name

Sex

Position

/ Organization/Villag

e

1 Chhiv Sarorn M Deputy Municipal of Svay Rieng Svay Rieng Town



4 Souce Sear M Village head Bak Ronorse

5 Pal Saban M Village head Po Phlear

6 Sam Samet M Thlork

7 Ros Hun M Staff of village Bak Ronorse

8 Tith Salei F Deputy of village Po Phlear

9 Nem Savoeurn F Staff of village Po Phlear

10 Kim Sina F Staff of village Aknakot

11 Em Kroch M Deputy of village Aknakot

12 Pen Malida F Deputy of village Thlork

13 Sao Han M Village head Aknakot

14 Phouk Cheat M Village head Preah Tonle

15 Meas Horn M Commune Council Sang Khor

16 Torn Samon M Deputy of village Bak Ronorse

17 Sin Yong M Chief of Commune Sang Khor

18 Sok Norn M Deputy Chief of Commune Sang Khor

19 Sorn Sam At M Village head Thmey

20 Choup Chanrithy M Community Development Town Svay Rieng

21 M

22

Appendix 5

138

Summary of Post-IOL Survey Consultations Held (South)

Discuss the result of IOL( how many losing entire houses, entire shops and public facilities such as electric and communication poles need to be relocated

Discuss Resettlement policy in general terms (affected houses and other structures will be compensated at replacement cost

find out from the affected people their suggestions and preferences regarding compensation, allowances and assistance, relocation of structures

Re-inform the cutoff date

No Road




Main Points Raised by the People

1 NR 314D Mon, 20 June 2011

Svay Tep

He has two place of Residential land along road NR-314D but, he participated to measured only one place, how should he do?

Proposed to constructed drainage along the during road construction.

When will project stared compensation?

For example: If landless where people should live?

2 NR 314D Mon, 20 June 2011

Kampong Ro

Proposed to constructed drainage along the during road construction

Project construct road in district 50% people to proposed to constructed 50% more road to improve the town in district if possible.

Compensation rate, how much per quare meter?

3 NR 13 Tu, 21 June 2011

Svay Rieng

If affected fences or stalls, will the project pay for compensation or not?

If affected public assets, how should they pay compensation?

4 NR 13 Tu, 21 June 2011

Rom Duol

If People that landless, where should they can live and how to do?

Mrs. Loek Nary, she did not complain with project if government need.

Mr. Prum Savan, Survey team measure for his residential land and structure, but, he did not measured his farm land along the road site

Mrs.Pum Phanna, During measurement survey she did not stay at home, hoe should she do?

Mr. Ros Mara, the project need

Appendix 5

139

No Road





10m each side total 20m, do the project need some more land or not?

Proposed to minimize COI around 7 to 8m each side for urban area?

5 NR 13 Wed, 22 June 2011

Romeas Haek

Mr. Pich Saran, Culvert for waste water in samroung Urban area is money collected from local people, if road constructed affected with their culvert, collected money from local people again or responsible by road project?

6 NR 13 Wed, 22 June 2011

Kamchay Mear

71

Don’t excavated land in ROW like canal, to used for road construction, should get from borrow pit far from the road ROW.

Mr. Heng Sam On, Proposed project to study to be suitable compensation rate.

Propose contractor vehicle slow down their speed and proposed spray water at least two time aday.

How much the ROW of the roas number 13?

7 NR 150B Thu, 23 June 2011

Kampong Tralach

Compensation rate, how much per quare meter?

If affected Concrete Grave, how the project compensation for this Grave?

Don’t excavated land in ROW like canal, to used for road construction, should get from borrow pit far from the road ROW.

The project need 10m each side total 20m, do the project need some more land or not?

How the project compensation for all properties that affected by project base on currently market value?

If people that affected 100% of their land affected, where should their live?

8 NR 150B Thu, 23 June 2011

Samki Meanchey

Road construction need only 10 each site for road construction or need more top soil?

How the project compensation for

Appendix 5

140

No Road





all properties that affected by project base on currently market value?


9 NR 150B and 53

Fri, 24 June 2011

Tuok Phos


Road construction need only 10 each site for road construction or need more for top soil?

Provincial Road Improvement Project is a project that important to develop rural area all people very happy with this project and proposed to start constructed as soon as possible they did not build any more structures from now, and thanks for Government of Cambodia that have this project.

10 NR 53 and 151B

Fri, 24 June 2011

Thpong N/A

Appendix 5

141

Minutes Meeting at Svay Teap District

- Date: Monday, 20/ June, 2011 - Place: Prasot Commune - Time: 8h00

Participants 1- Mr. Penh Pha (Deputy Chief of Svay Tep District)

2- Mr. Try Yorn (Resettlement Unit from MPWT 3- Seang Bora (Local Resettlement Consultant) 4- Commune Chiefs, 5- Village headman

AGENDA

Introduce purpose of the Post- IOL consultation meeting

Discuss the result of IOL( how many losing entire houses, entire shops and public facilities such aselectric and communication poles need to be relocate, Residential Land, Commercial Land, Farm land

Discuss Resettlement policy in general term (affected houses and other structures will be compensatedat replacement cost at currently market value

find out from the affected people, Vulnerable people, Severity people and their suggestions andpreferences regarding compensation, allowances and assistance, relocation of structures, grievance redress and participation

Re-inform Cutoff date to authorities and APs don’t be build structures in COI after cutoff date

grievance redress and participation

Minimize impact of the project A- Mr. Penh Pha (Deputy Chief of Svay Tep District)

Report name of District, Communes and village along NR-314D in Kampong Ro District from Svay Tep district to Prey Vao Vietname border and Participants during this meeting (see attach files ), and transfer purpose of meeting to Mr. Try Yorn (Resettlement Unit from MPWT) and Local Resettlement Consultant.

B- Mr. Try Yorn (Resettlement Unit from MPWT)

Thanks you very much for Deputy of district, Commune Chiefs, Village headman and all of affected people that has present here today. Referring to population and Transportation were increased from day to day, The Government of Cambodia has requested the Asian Development Bank (ADB) project preparatory technical assistance (TA) to prepare the Provincial Roads Improvement Project. Among others, the project aims to rehabilitate NR 314D from Prosot to the border of Vietnam at Prey Var-Mocva, 26,5 km; construct a new cross border facility (CBF) at Prey Var-Mocva; NR 13 connecting NR 8 and NR1, between Komchay Mear 65 km; NR150B, 53 and 151B which traverse Kampong Chhnang and Kampong Speu provinces, we need time to study more after submit to Government and ADB for approved after construction. The Pre IOL was conducted, Now, Post IOL are inform the meeting to understanding the result of Inventory loss, But the result

Appendix 5

142

will introduce by Local Resettlement Consultant.

C- Mr. Seang Bora (Local Resettlement Consultant) Thanks you again for Deputy Chief of district, Commune Chiefs, Village headman and all of affected people that has present here today. We was first meeting with authorities, not participated with APs in May 2011 for proposed authorities to inform to all APs know information about survey team to measured, interview APs along the NR 314D. Now, this is second meeting that have authorities and affected people to participate to understand the first result during conducted IOL. As you know Survey team was conducted measured, Interviewed IOL and SES with affected people that affected in the COI ten meters each side, the total length around 26,5 Km, the total affected people are 288households, Interview with men are 159 households, interview with women are 56 households and did not meet owners are 73 households. In 288 households affected residential land 14300m2, Commercial land is 1632.2m2; agricultural land is 12004m2, Widow 23 households, poor 40 household, disable 01. Affected Electric and communication post 135(Concrete 57 Steel 03 and Wood 75), affected 36 houses, Partial houses 18 and entire houses 18, Divorced 01 household, Widow 23, Poor 40 and Disable 01. Affected people total 288 household are legible APs that project affected people for NR 314D, So all of properties affected by project will compensate base on replacement cost result at currently market value after replacement cost study completed and send to IRC/MEF, when IRC/ MEF approved and for vulnerable group like Widow, Elderly, handicap, displace people and people income under national poverty line will haveassistance out of properties affected by project. Cutoff date: The project was limited the date of IOL is cutoff date that mead by no more structures builds in the COI. The projects still have option to minimize impact, should be keep the same COI or decrease COI for urban area depending on detail design of road engineering. Grievance redress and participation: The grievance redress process includes four stages. There are three stages before complaints may be elevated to a court of law as a last resort.

(i) First stage: APs will present their complaints andgrievances verbally or in writing to the CLAC. The CLAC will be obliged to provide immediate written confirmation of receiving the complaint. If after 15 days the aggrieved AP does not hear from the CLAC, or if the AP is not satisfied with the decision taken in the first stage, the complaint may be brought to the District Office.

(ii) Second stage: The District Office has 15days within which to resolve the complaint to the satisfaction of all concerned. If the complaint cannot be solved at this stage, the District Office will bring the case to the Provincial Grievance Redress Committee.

(iii) Third stage: The Provincial GrievanceRedress Committee meets with the aggrieved party and tries to resolve the situation. The Committee may ask for a

Appendix 5

143

review of the DMS by the external monitor (EMO). Within 30 days of the submission of the grievance, the Committee must make a written decision and submit copies to the MPWT, PRS/IRC and the AP.

(iv) Final stage: If the aggrievedAP does not hear from the Provincial Grievance Redress Committee or is not satisfied, he/she will bring the case to Provincial Court. This is the final stage for adjudicating complaints. Within 30 days of the submission of the grievance, the Court must make a written decision and submit copies to the MPWT, PRS/IRC and the AP. If any party is still unsatisfied with the Provincial Court judgment, he/she can bring the case to a higher-level court.


Mr. Seang Bora

Attendants List

Province: Svay Rieng, District, Svay Tep,


1 Penh Pha M Deputy Chief of district Svay Tep

2 Try Yorn M Resettlement Unit MPWT


4 Sin Somaly M Seller Brosot I

5 Long Theun M Seller Brosot I

6 So SiThuon M Seller Brosot I

7 Hun Savat M Seller Pothivong

8 Hun Song F People Pothivong

9 Yous Samith M People Pothivong

10 Sao Sameun F People Pothivong

11 Chim Thany F People Pothivong

12 Sao sokhom M People Pothivong

13 Sao Chantha M People Pothivong

14 Koy Vat M People Pothivong

15 Put Chea M People Pothivong

16 Lek Sin F People Pothivong

17 Yak Ral M People Pothivong

18 Not Socheat M People BrosotI

19 Srey Som auon M People BrosotI

20 Un Sok F People BrosotI

21 To Vei F People Brosot I

22 To Leng M People Brosot I

23 Suos Hong M People Brosot I

24 Meas Chea M People Brosot II

Appendix 5

144

25 Kong Somaean M People Brosot II

26 Put Nouv F People Brosot II

27 Preap Tith M People BrosotII

28 Prom Saroeun F People Pothivong

29 On Somalay M Teacher Pothivong

30 Mey Saran F People Pothivong

31 Choeuk Phan F People Pothivong

32 Ruos Sina F People Brosot

33 Ruos Sombath F People Brosot

34 Chea Somnang M People Brosot

35 Preap Chantha M People Brosot

36 Prom Nouy F People Tuol trobek

37 Te kieng F People Brosot

38 Va Chom M People BrosotI

39 Khiev Bopha M People BrosotI

40 To Raty M People BrosotI

41 Mao Sarith F People Brosot

42 Kao Sokha F People Brosot

43 Mao Sophy F People Tuol trobek

44 Som Savin M Seller BrosotI

45 Pok Saroeun F Seller Tuoltrobek

46 Long Chan M Seller Prey Roduol

47 Som Phaly M People Tuoltrobek

48 Nhim Boran M People Tuoltrobek

49 Suos Sarong M People Tuoltrobek

50 Prak Sovanara M People Tuoltrobek

51 Net Chantha F People Tuoltrobek

52 Va Nget F People Tuoltrobek

53 Thong Sakun F People Tuoltrobek

54 Nuon Pok M People Tuoltrobek

55 Net Sarith F People Tuoltrobek

56 Prom Somaol F People Tuoltrobek

57 Hel Choeun F People Tuoltrobek

58 Min San F People Tuoltrobek

59 Hok Yon F People Tuoltrobek

60 Duong Chinh M People Tuol trobek

61 Um Saron M People Tuoltrobek

62 Prak Sakhon M People Tuoltrobek

Appendix 5

145

Participants 81, Female 30

63 Prom Phan M People Tuoltrobek

64 Nhanh Sonoeun M People Pothivong

65 Po Leat M People Pothivong

66 El Ry F People Pothivong

67 Nhem Ravy M People Pothivong

68 Uk Somnang M People BrosotI

69 Prak Sombat F People Tuoltrobek

70 Meas Somaly F People Brosot I

71 Ben Yin M People Tuoltrobek

72 Prak Sitha F People Brosot II

73 Suos Sokha M People Tuoltrobek

74 Ruos Sakun M People Brosot II

75 Sok Chany M People BrosotII

76 Chea Somnang M People Brosot

77 Phat Sochea M People Brosot

78 Cheng Vannak M People Prey Roduol

79 Koy Sarin M People Brosot II

80 Val Leng M Soldier Brosot II

81 Sok Vanna M Soldier Brosot I

Appendix 5

146

Minutes Meeting at Kampong Ro District

- Date: Monday, 20/ June, 2011 - Place: Pagoda Ro - Time: 2h00

Participants 1- Souce Samreth (Deputy of District)

2- Mr. Try Yorn (Resettlement Unit from MPWT 3- Seang Bora (Local Resettlement Consultant) 4- Saom Hang Commune head 5- Kat Kim Village head 6- Sao Samen Village head 7- Sam Sorn Village head

AGENDA







Minimize impact of the project A- Mr. Souce Samreth (Deputy of District)

Report name of District, Communes and village along NR-314D in Svay Tep District from NR-1 to Kampong Ro district’s border and Participants during this meeting (see attach files ), and transfer purpose of meeting to Mr. Try Yorn (Resettlement Unit from MPWT) and Local Resettlement Consultant to presentation the primary result of IOL and SES,


Thanks you very much for Deputy of district, Commune Chiefs, Village headman and all of affected people that has present here today. Referring to population and Transportation were increased from day to day, The Government of Cambodia has requested the Asian Development Bank (ADB) project preparatory technical assistance (TA) to prepare the Provincial Roads Improvement Project. Among others, the project aims to rehabilitate NR 314D from Prosot to the border of Vietnam at Prey Var-Mocva, 26,5 km; construct a new cross border facility (CBF) at Prey Var-Mocva; NR 13 connecting NR 8 and NR1, between Komchay Mear 65 km; NR150B, 53 and 151B which traverse Kampong Chhnang and Kampong Speu provinces, we need time to study more after submit to Government and

Appendix 5

147

ADB for approved after construction. The Pre IOL was conducted, Now, Post IOL are inform the meeting to understanding the result of Inventory loss, But the result will introduce by Local Resettlement Consultant.

C- Mr. Seang Bora (Local Resettlement Consultant) Thanks you again for Deputy Chief of district, Commune Chiefs, Village headman and all of affected people that has present here today. First, I would like to inform the meeting that, We had first meeting with authorities, not participated with APs in May 2011 for proposed authorities to inform to all APs know information about survey team to measured, interview APs along the NR 314D. Now, this is second meeting that have authorities and affected people to participate to understand the first result during conducted IOL. As you know Survey team was conducted measured, Interviewed IOL and SES with affected people that affected in the COI ten meters each side, the total affected people along road number 314D that have distance around 26,5 Km are affected 288households, Interview with men are 159 households, interview with women are 56 households and did not meet owners are 73 households. In 288 households affected residential land 14300m2, Commercial land is 1632.2m2; agricultural land is 12004m2, Widow 23 households, poor 40 household, disable 01. Affected Electric and communication post 135(Concrete 57 Steel 03 and Wood 75), affected 36 houses, Partial houses 18 and entire houses 18. Affected people total 288 household are legible APs that project affected people for NR 314D, So all of properties affected by project will compensate base on replacement cost result at currently market value after replacement cost study completed and send to IRC/MEF, when IRC/ MEF approved and for vulnerable group like Widow, Elderly, handicap, displace people and people income under national poverty line will haveassistance out of properties affected by project. Cutoff date: The project was limited the date of IOL is cutoff date that mead by no more structures builds in the COI. The projects still have option to minimize impact, should be keep the same COI or decrease COI for urban area depending on detail design of road engineering. Grievance redress and participation: The grievance redress process includes four stages. There are three stages before complaints may be elevated to a court of law as a last resort.

(v) First stage: APs will present their complaints andgrievances verbally or in writing to the CLAC. The CLAC will be obliged to provide immediate written confirmation of receiving the complaint. If after 15 days the aggrieved AP does not hear from the CLAC, or if the AP is not satisfied with the decision taken in the first stage, the complaint may be brought to the District Office.

(vi) Second stage: The District Office has 15days within which to resolve the complaint to the satisfaction of all concerned. If the complaint cannot be solved at this stage, the District Office will bring the case to the Provincial Grievance Redress Committee.

Appendix 5

148

(vii) Third stage: The Provincial GrievanceRedress Committee meets with the aggrieved party and tries to resolve the situation. The Committee may ask for a review of the DMS by the external monitor (EMO). Within 30 days of the submission of the grievance, the Committee must make a written decision and submit copies to the MPWT, PRS/IRC and the AP.

(viii) Final stage: If the aggrievedAP does not hear from the Provincial Grievance Redress Committee or is not satisfied, he/she will bring the case to Provincial Court. This is the final stage for adjudicating complaints. Within 30 days of the submission of the grievance, the Court must make a written decision and submit copies to the MOWRAM, PDWRAM, PDRD, EMO, PRS/IRC and the AP. If any party is still unsatisfied with the Provincial Court judgment, he/she can bring the case to a higher-level court.

Attendants List


1 Souce Samreth M Deputy of District Kampong Ro



4 Sam Sorn M Village headman Trapeang Trave

5 Chin Em M People Trapeang Trave

6 Seth Koeng M People Trapeang Trave

7 Chhuon Sakoun M People Trapeang Trave

8 Bive Sinath F People Trapeang Trave

9 Loeng Sitha F People Trapeang Trave

10 Boek Saroeurn F People Trapeang Trave

11 Kok Him F People Trapeang Trave

12 Hemh Sam Phorse F People Trapeang Trave

13 Kiv Many F People Trapeang Trave

14 Heng Sam On F People Trapeang Trave

15 Chuon Vanna M People Trapeang Trave

16 Gnuoy Chanda M People Trapeang Trave

17 Long Vuthy M People Trapeang Trave

18 Put Eng M People Trapeang Trave

19 Khmao Sareth M People Trapeang Trave

20 Keo Phearum M People Trapeang Trave

21 Chhan Thim M People Trapeang Trave

22 Ngin Khemra M People Trapeang Trave

23 Ouk Kory M People Trapeang Trave

24 Pol Rorn M People Svay Anath

25 Duch Try M People Svay Anath

26 Sok Ouk M People Svay Anath

27 Sar Tith M People Svay Anath

28 Suo Phorse M People Ro

Appendix 5

149

Total participants are 41person, female 12person


Mr. Seang Bora

29 Pin Ty F People Ro

30 Seang Sina F People Ro

31 Khat Pheach F People Svay Anath

32 Chab Hean M People Svay Anath

33 Neang Peak M People Svay Anath

34 Sao Samen M Deputy ofvillage Svay Anath

35 Sek Nhim M Deputy ofvillage Ro

36 Sar Phal M People Svay Anath

37 Chan Sokha F People Trapeang Trave

38 Pok Chanda F People Ro

39 Chea Mavany F People Svay Anath

40 Ke Samon F People Svay Anath

41 Sam Sporn M Village head Trapeang Trav

Appendix 5

150

Minutes Meeting for post-IOL at Svay Rieng District-NR-13

- Date: Monday, 21/ June, 2011 - Place: Preah Ponlea Village - Time: 8h00

Participants

1- Chhive Saroen (Deputy Municipal of Svay Rieng Town) 2- Mr. Try Yorn (Resettlement Unit from MPWT 3- Seang Bora (Local Resettlement Consultant) 4- Sin Yong (Commune Chief) 5- Kat Kim Village head 6- a Lady commune council 7- All of 6 Villages head

AGENDA







Minimize impact of the project A- Municipal of Svay Rieng Town (Mr. Chhiv Saroen)

Report name of District, Communes and village along NR-13 from National road 1 to border of Rumduol district have 6 villages. and Participants during this meeting (see attach files ), and after that Municipal transfer purpose of meeting to Mr. Try Yorn (Resettlement Unit from MPWT) and Local Resettlement Consultant to explain the result as following:


Thanks you very much for present of Deputy Municipal of Svay Rieng Town, Commune Chiefs, Village headman and all of affected people that has present here today. Referring to population and Transportation were increased from day to day, The Government of Cambodia has requested the Asian Development Bank (ADB) project preparatory technical assistance (TA) to prepare the Provincial Roads Improvement Project. Among others, the project aims to rehabilitate NR 13 from NR-1 to NR-8, 65 km; construct a new cross border facility (CBF) at Prey Var-Mocva; NR 13 connecting NR 8 and NR1, between

Appendix 5

151

Komchay Mear NR150B, 53 and 151B which traverse Kampong Chhnang and Kampong Speu provinces, we need time to study more after submit to Government and ADB for approved after construction. The Pre-IOL was conducted in May 2011, Now, Post-IOL are inform the meeting to understanding the result of Inventory loss, But the result will introduce by Local Resettlement Consultant

C- Mr. Seang Bora (Local Resettlement Consultant) Again, I would like to say thanks you very much for Deputy of Municipal of Svay Rieng Town, Commune Chiefs, Village headman and all of affected people that has present here today. We was first meeting with authorities in May 2011, by not participated with for proposed authorities to inform to all APs know information about survey team to measured, interview APs along the NR 13 for conducted Inventory of Loss. Now, this is second meeting that have authorities and affected people participate to understand the Primary data result during conducted IOL. During conducted pre-IOL, the team were study along NR-13 there are 4 districts, 11 communes and 39 villages and Survey team was conducted measured, Interviewed IOL and SES with affected people that affected in the COI ten meters each side fro centerline, the total affected people around 65Km is 676 households, Interview with men are 381 households, interview with women are 101 households and did not meet owners are 472households. In 676 households affected residential land 1690.1m2, Commercial land is 1026.9m2; agricultural land is 44681.3m2, electric post 42 and telephone post and affected 45 houses, Partial houses 25 and entire houses 20. Shops/Stalls 62, Partial 17 and entire 45. Affected people total 676 household are legible APs that project affected people for NR 13, So all of properties affected by project will compensate base on replacement cost result at currently market value after approved rate from IRC at MEF and for vulnerable group like Widow, Elderly, handicap, displace people and people income under national poverty line will haveassistance out of properties affected by project. Except Sangkhor commune were conducted with 85 households, Male 41 households, Female 16 households and did not meet owner 28 households that affected Farm land12420m2, Residential land 429m2 and commercial land is 48m2, the total is 12594m2. Cutoff date: The project was limited the date of IOL is cutoff date that mead by no more structures builds in the COI. The projects still have option to minimize impact, should be keep the same COI or decrease COI for urban area depending on detail design of road engineering. Grievance redress and participation: The grievance redress process includes four stages. There are three stages before complaints may be elevated to a court of law as a last resort.

(ix) First stage: APs will present their complaints andgrievances verbally or in writing to the CLAC. The CLAC will be obliged to provide immediate written confirmation of receiving the complaint. If after 15 days the aggrieved AP does not hear from

Appendix 5

152

the CLAC, or if the AP is not satisfied with the decision taken in the first stage, the complaint may be brought to the District Office.

(x) Second stage: The District Office has 15days within which to resolve the complaint to the satisfaction of all concerned. If the complaint cannot be solved at this stage, the District Office will bring the case to the Provincial Grievance Redress Committee.

(xi) Third stage: The Provincial GrievanceRedress Committee meets with the aggrieved party and tries to resolve the situation. The Committee may ask for a review of the DMS by the external monitor (EMO). Within 30 days of the submission of the grievance, the Committee must make a written decision and submit copies to the MPWT, PRS/IRC and the AP.

(xii) Final stage: If the aggrievedAP does not hear from the Provincial Grievance Redress Committee or is not satisfied, he/she will bring the case to Provincial Court. This is the final stage for adjudicating complaints. Within 30 days of the submission of the grievance, the Court must make a written decision and submit copies to the MPWT, PRS/IRC and the AP. If any party is still unsatisfied with the Provincial Court judgment, he/she can bring the case to a higher-level court.

Attendants List

Province: Svay Rieng Town No. Name Sex Position Organization/Village

1 Souce Samreth M Deputy Municipal of Svay Rieng town

Svay Rieng



4 Phae Oul M People

5 Sao Han M Village headman Aknakot

6 Pal Saban M Village headman Poplea

7 Souce Sear M Village headman Bak Roneas

8 Phouk Cheat M Village headman Prash Tole

9 Srey Eam M People Prash Tole

10 Manh Lun F People Prash Tole

11 Roth Sokhon F People Aknakot

12 So Keayou F People Aknakot

13 Phoeuk Savun F People Aknakot

14 Roth Sanen F People Aknakot

15 So Phear F People Aknakot

16 So Phy M People Aknakot

17 Seng Phalla F People Aknakot

18 Mao Ra F People Aknakot

19 Yang Sok M People Aknakot

20 Prum Yong F People Aknakot

21 Moeurn Son F People Aknakot

22 Sok sophy F People Aknakot

23 Chan Sinath M People Aknakot

Appendix 5

153

24 Phay Sophat M People Aknakot

25 Nou Sophorn M People Aknakot

26 Mom Von M People Aknakot

27 Kao Thy M People Poplea

28 Im Samoeurn M People Aknakot

29 Sok Sat M People Aknakot

30 Nhim Sitha M People Aknakot

31 Chan Sath M People Aknakot

32 Chea Vanna M People Aknakot

33 Tep Thach F People Aknakot

34 Pov Saran F People Aknakot

35 Ra Yan F People Aknakot

36 Som Chanda F People Aknakot

37 Yim Ponry F People Aknakot

38 Chork Chhorn F People Aknakot

39 Chan Sopheap F People Aknakot

40 Pich Sithan F People Aknakot

41 Pich Savorn F People Aknakot

42 Yim Koung Kear F People Aknakot

43 En Sinath F People Aknakot

44 Kem Ray F People Aknakot

45 Mao Sareth F People Aknakot

46 Khuon Yan F People Aknakot

47 Roth Savan F People Aknakot

48 Roth Vantha F People Aknakot

49 Roth Vanthorn F People Aknakot

50 Kim Srey Lak F People Aknakot

51 Top Naroth F People Aknakot

52 Kim Ath F People Aknakot

53 Sar Saphan M People Thlok Viilage

54 Sek Sa Em M People Thlok Viilage

55 Meas Buntha M People Prash Tole

56 Phouk Pilot M People Prash Tole

57 Keo Chetna M People Prash Tole

58 Morn Vanara M People Thlok Viilage

59 Nhean Dara M People Thlok Viilage

60 Som Chanthy M People Baroneas

61 Prak Kalan M People Thlok Viilage

Appendix 5

154

62 Neang Sun F People Prash Tole

63 Nhek Phy M People Aknakot

64 Tith Phang M People Aknakot

65 Srey On M People Aknakot

66 Phay Sophat M People Aknakot

67 PovVichet M People Aknakot

68 Chab Phala M People Aknakot

69 Hem Vibol M People Aknakot

70 Ham Sok M People Aknakot

71 Sam Chorn M People Aknakot

72 Sok Saketh F People Prash Tole

73 Po Chhoy M People Prash Tole

74 Pork Saruon F People Prash Tole

75 Sok Sun F People Prash Tole

76 Kaen Puth M People Prash Tole

77 Saom Phon M People Prash Tole

78 Saom Buny M People Prash Tole

79 Yush Proeurn M People Prash Tole

80 Khut Horn F People Prash Tole

81 Mom Phalla F People Prash Tole

82 Meas Lath F People Prash Tole

83 Saom Sokhara F People Prash Tole

84 Kheo Vaney M People Prash Tole

85 Hong Pov M People Prash Tole

86 Orn Manphath F People Prash Tole

87 Orn Manna F People Prash Tole

88 Pe Hun M People Prash Tole

89 Oung Buunthoeurn F People Prash Tole

90 KoungChanty F People Prash Tole

91 Pen Sambath M People Thlok Viilage

92 Pen Sitho F People Thlok Viilage

93 Ouk Chan thy F People Thlok Viilage

94 RathSao M People Thlok Viilage

95 Pok Naran F People Thlok Viilage

96 Souce Somala F People Thlok Viilage

97 Chan Sem F People Thlok Viilage

98 MeasSeang M People Thlok Viilage

99 Kao Sam OL M People Prash Tole

Appendix 5

155

100 Meas Phorn F People Thlok Viilage

101 Nhon Sakhoeurn M People Thlok Viilage

102 Tang Sopheap M People Thlok Viilage

103 Pen Sokha M People Thlok Viilage

104 Min Phalla F People Thlok Viilage

105 Yin Kimhan M People Thlok Viilage

106 Heng Song F People Thlok Viilage

107 Som Sambath F People Thlok Viilage

108 Mom Koy M People Aknakot

109 Ros Han F People Aknakot

110 Chhun Saran M People Poplea

111 Som Soum M People Poplea

112 Lay Lun M People Poplea

113 Tep Tharachan F People Poplea

114 Tep Neang M People Poplea

115 Kim Lay M People Poplea

116 Tith Saley M People Poplea

117 Heang Sam Oeurn M People Poplea

118 Ham Soda M People Thlok Viilage

119 Heng Puth F People Thlok Viilage

120 Kaeng Phal M People Thlok Viilage

121 Ham Soy M People Thlok Viilage

122 Khuon Narin M People Thlok Viilage

123 Reach Sovanna F People Thlok Viilage

124 Tith Chamroeurn M People Thlok Viilage

125 Phay Seang Ly M People Bak Roneas

126 Saom Channy F People Bak Roneas

127 saom Sao M People Prash Tole

128 Pin Thol M People Aknakot

129 Koung Soeurn M People Aknakot

130 Sok Kan M People Poplea

131 Kaen Duk M People Poplea

132 Kaen Rany M People Poplea

133 LongKoy M People Poplea

134 Ey Sophat M People Poplea

135 Sou Nun F People Poplea

136 Mom Pha M People Poplea

137 Kao Sithorn F People Poplea

Appendix 5

156

138 Yan Sim F People Aknakot

139 Ya Nay F People Aknakot

140 Sou Sam Ath M People Aknakot

141 Pov Socheat M People Aknakot

142 Puk sey M People Poplea

143 Pen Phaly F People Bak Roneas

144 Noun Phally F People Bak Roneas

145 So Sokhunthea F People Prash Tole

146 orn Saran M People Prash Tole

147 Chay Tan M People Prash Tole

148 Sin Kom Pheak F People Bak Roneas

149 Mao Sary F People Bak Roneas

150 Peb Sorn F People Prash Tole

151 Chum San F People Prash Tole

152 Koung Saveth F People Prash Tole

153 Hour Saphoeurn M People Bak Roneas

154 Pov Chan F People Bak Roneas

155 Chay Veasna M People Bak Roneas

156 Chhay Chamrong F People Bak Roneas

157 Meas Yam M People Thlok Viilage

158 En Saroeurn F People Prash Tole

159 Orn Sothany F People Prash Tole

160 Puth Sokhany F People Prash Tole

161 En Sak F People Prash Tole

162 Sao Saman M People Prash Tole

163 Prak Kear Thy F People Prash Tole

164 So Saroeurn F People Prash Tole

165 Srey Soeurn F People Prash Tole

166 Norn Phanna F People Prash Tole

167 Yi Chakriya F People Prash Tole

168 Meas Lat F People Prash Tole

169 Nhem Chanda F People Prash Tole

170 En Line M People Prash Tole

171 Meas Saran F People Prash Tole

172 Long Sarin F People Prash Tole

173 Yi Than F People Prash Tole

174 Penh Yin F People Prash Tole

175 Van Phanna M People Prash Tole

Appendix 5

157


Mr. Seang Bora

176 Pork Sarem F People Prash Tole

177 Sin Sokha F People Bak Roneas

178 Sok Nhorn F People Poplea

179 Sok Bun F People Aknakot

180 Manh Chean F People Prash Tole

181 Om Sa Orn M People Prash Tole

182 Ey Mao F People Prash Tole

183 Po Chuy M People Prash Tole

184 Orn Suon F People Prash Tole

185 Ken Phalla F People Prash Tole

186 Hoeurng Sophay F People Aknakot

187 En Sarin M People Aknakot

188 Sok Pith M People Poplea

189 Ouk Chea M People Poplea

190 Gnoun Sophan F People Poplea

191 Ngoun Kosal M People Poplea

192 Chain Sareth M People Poplea

193 Pon Sophal F People Poplea

194 Pen Sireth M People Poplea

195 Sok Dy M People Poplea

196 Chem Sakhorn M People Poplea

197 Kim Phorn M People Aknakot

198 Puth Chhoet M People Aknakot

199 Puth Sipha M People Aknakot

200 Prum Kunthea F People Aknakot

201 Nay Ren M People Aknakot

202 Khat Sang F People Aknakot

203 Kim Savan F People Aknakot

204 Peb Saran M People Aknakot

205 Prak Pich M People Aknakot

206 He Choeurn M People Aknakot

207 Ouk Orn F People Aknakot

208 Sok Buntha F People Aknakot

209 Chan rithy M People Poplea

Appendix 5

158

Minutes Meeting for post-IOL at Rum Duol District-NR-13

- Date: Monday, 21/ June, 2011 - Place: Rumduol District center - Time: 2h00 PM

Participants

1- PenSam An (Chief of Dumduol District) 2- Mr. Try Yorn (Resettlement Unit from MPWT 3- Seang Bora (Local Resettlement Consultant) 4- Commune Chief, Commune Council of Kampong Chork and Villages head)

AGENDA







Minimize impact of the project A- Mr. Pen Sam An (Chief of Romduol district)

Report name of District, Communes and village along NR-13 from border of Svay Rieng to border of Romeas Haek district have 4 communes and 12villages. and Participants during this meeting (see attach files ), and after that Chief of district transfer purpose of meeting to Mr. Try Yorn (Resettlement Unit from MPWT) and Local Resettlement Consultant to explain the result as following:


Thanks you very much for present of Chief of district, Commune Chiefs, Village headman and all of affected people that has present here today. Referring to population and Transportation were increased from day to day, The Government of Cambodia has requested the Asian Development Bank (ADB) project preparatory technical assistance (TA) to prepare the Provincial Roads Improvement Project. Among others, the project aims to rehabilitate NR 13 from NR-1 to NR-8, 65 km; construct a new cross border facility (CBF) at Prey Var-Mocva; NR 13 connecting NR 8 and NR1, between Komchay Mear NR150B,

Appendix 5

159

53 and 151B which traverse Kampong Chhnang and Kampong Speu provinces, we need time to study more after submit to Government and ADB for approved after construction. The Pre-IOL was conducted in May 2011, Now, Post-IOL are inform the meeting to understanding the result of Inventory loss, But the result will introduce by Local Resettlement Consultant.

C- Mr. Seang Bora (Local Resettlement Consultant)

Again, I would like to say thanks you very much for Chief of district, Commune Chiefs, Village headman and all of affected people that has present meeting here today. We was first meeting with authorities in May 2011, by not participated with for proposed authorities to inform to all APs know information about survey team to measured, interview APs along the NR 13 for conducted Inventory of Loss in area of Rumduol district. Now, this is second meeting that have authorities and affected people participate to understand the Primary data result during conducted IOL. During conducted pre-IOL, the team were study along NR-13 there are 4 districts, 11 communes and 39 villages and Survey team was conducted measured, Interviewed IOL and SES with affected people that affected in the COI ten meters each side from centerline, the total affected people around 65Km is 676 households, Interview with men are 381 households, interview with women are 101 households and did not meet owners are 472households. In 676 households affected residential land 1690.1m2, Commercial land is 1026.9m2; agricultural land is 44681.3m2, electric post 42 and telephone post and affected 105 houses, House/Store 03, Store/ Shops/ Restaurant 114. Divorced 8 households, Widow 30 households, Disable 5 households, Poor 96 households. Affected people total 676 household are legible APs that project affected people for NR 13, So all of properties affected by project will compensate base on replacement cost study result at currently market value after approved rate from IRC at MEF and for vulnerable group like Widow, Elderly, handicap, displace people and people income under national poverty line will haveassistance out of properties affected by project. Rumduol district were conducted with 4 communes, 12 villages that affected with Project. Cutoff date: The project was limited the date of IOL is cutoff date that mead by no more structures will build in the COI. The projects still have option to minimize impact, should be keep the same COI or decrease COI for urban area depending on detail design of road engineering. Grievance redress and participation: The grievance redress process includes four stages. There are three stages before complaints may be elevated to a court of law as a last resort.

(xiii) First stage: APs will present their complaints andgrievances verbally or in writing to the CLAC. The CLAC will be obliged to provide immediate written confirmation of receiving the complaint. If after 15 days the aggrieved AP does not hear from the CLAC, or if the AP is not satisfied with the decision taken in the first stage, the complaint may be brought to the District Office.

Appendix 5

160

(xiv) Second stage: The District Office has 15days within which to resolve the complaint to the satisfaction of all concerned. If the complaint cannot be solved at this stage, the District Office will bring the case to the Provincial Grievance Redress Committee.

(xv) Third stage: The Provincial GrievanceRedress Committee meets with the aggrieved party and tries to resolve the situation. The Committee may ask for a review of the DMS by the external monitor (EMO). Within 30 days of the submission of the grievance, the Committee must make a written decision and submit copies to the MPWT, PRS/IRC and the AP.

(xvi) Final stage: If the aggrievedAP does not hear from the Provincial Grievance Redress Committee or is not satisfied, he/she will bring the case to Provincial Court. This is the final stage for adjudicating complaints. Within 30 days of the submission of the grievance, the Court must make a written decision and submit copies to the MPWT, PRS/IRC and the AP. If any party is still unsatisfied with the Provincial Court judgment, he/she can bring the case to a higher-level court.

Attendants List

Province: Rumduol District No. Name Sex Position Organization/Village

1 Pen Sam An M Rumduol



4 Da Boraen M People Prey Keav

5 Sao Sarim M People Prey Keav

6 Sao Sarorn M People Prey Keav

7 Yin Outh F People Chork

8 Sun Phalla F People Prey Keav

9 Nuon Kim M People Prey Keav

10 Sem Bunthorurn M People Prey Keav

11 Yang Sarorn M People Chork

12 Duch Chantha F People Chork

13 Kim Sarin F People Prey Keav

14 Kung Kunthea M People Prey Keav

15 Prak Sary F People Prey Keav

16 Chet Chanthorn M Village head Prey Keav

17 Pov Sinareth F People Prey Keav

18 Prum Sopha F People Chork

19 Heang Bunthoeurn M People Chork

20 Sok Sarorn M Village deouty Chork

21 Kem Vanna F People Prey Keav

22 Soch Saroeurn F People Chork

23 Nuon Khan M People Chork

24 Pen Sam An M Commune council Kampong Chork

25 Orn Rithy M People Prey Keav

26 Mao Phalla M People Chork

27 Has Srey Neang F People Chork

28 Ou Phany F People Prey Keav

29 Yi Vany F People Prey Keav

Appendix 5

161

Total participants are 64 persons, Female 27 persons


Mr. Seang Bora

30 Em Da F People Chork

31 Chea Thida F People Chork

32 Phal Sitha F People Chork

33 Hun Vanny F People Prey Keav

34 Naiy Sar M Admin Rumduol district

35 Kao Boren F People Prey Keav

36 Mey Navy F People Chork

37 Kung Piseth F People Chork

38 Pich Srey Naeng F People Chork

39 Toch Sinath M People Chork

40 Me Sophon F People Chork

41 Uk Kunthea F People Chork

42 Sorn Vanthorn F People Chork

43 Nuon Saron M People Chork

44 Ros Mara M Director of High school Chork

45 Long Saron M Teacher Chork

46 Seng Heang M People Chork

47 Loek sary F People Prey Keav

48 Kim Sakhorn M People Chork

49 Roth Sam Oeurn M People Chork

50 Em Sothea M People Chork

51 Mao Chanra M People Chork

52 Chap Sok F People Chork

53 Orn Saphat F People Prey Keav

54 Hing Vanna M People Prey Keav

55 Pov Khanpanharith M People Chork

56 Prum Savan M People Chork

57 Bo Kosal M People Chork

58 Meas Kala M People Chork

59 Kuy Ang M People Chork

60 Pen Sam M People Chork

61 Um Sopha F People Chork

62 Yim Heang F People Chork

63 Tang Sokhorn F People Chork

64 Pe OL M People Chork

65

Appendix 5

162

Minutes Meeting for post-IOL at Romeas Haek District-NR-13

- Date: Monday, 22/ June, 2011 - Place: Prasre Commune post center - Time: 9h00 AM

I- Participants

1- Mr.Haen Sakun (Deputy of Romeas Haek District) 2- Mr. Try Yorn (Resettlement Unit from MPWT 3- Seang Bora (Local Resettlement Consultant) 4- Chief of police post 5- Commune Chief, Commune Council of Kampong Chork and Villages head)

II- AGENDA







Minimize impact of the project A- Mr. Haen Sakun (Deputy of Romeas Haek District)

Report name of District, Communes and village along NR-13 from border of Rumduol to border of Kamchay Mear district have 5 communes and 19villages. and Participants during this meeting (see attach files ), and after that Chief of district transfer purpose of meeting to Mr. Try Yorn (Resettlement Unit from MPWT) and Local Resettlement Consultant to explain the primary result during IOL as following:


Thanks you very much for present of Deputy district of Romeas Haek, Commune Chiefs, Village headman and all of affected people that has present here today. Referring to population and Transportation were increased from day to day, The Government of Cambodia has requested the Asian Development Bank (ADB) project preparatory technical assistance (TA) to prepare the Provincial Roads Improvement Project. Among others, the project aims to rehabilitate NR 13 from NR-1 to NR-8, 65 km; construct a new cross border facility (CBF) at Prey Var-Mocva; NR 13 connecting NR 8 and NR1, between Komchay Mear NR150B, 53 and 151B which traverse Kampong Chhnang and Kampong Speu provinces,

Appendix 5

163

we need time to study more after submit to Government and ADB for approved after construction. The Pre-IOL was conducted in May 2011, Now, Post-IOL are inform the meeting to understanding the result of Inventory loss, But the result will introduce by Local Resettlement Consultant.

C- Mr. Seang Bora (Local Resettlement Consultant) Again, I would like to say thanks you very much for Chief of district, Commune Chiefs, Village headman and all of affected people that has present meeting here today. We was first meeting with authorities in May 2011, by not participated with for proposed authorities to inform to all APs know information about survey team to measured, interview APs along the NR 13 for conducted Inventory of Loss in area of Romeas Haek district. Now, this is second meeting that have authorities and affected people participate to understand the Primary data result during conducted IOL. During conducted pre-IOL, the team were study along NR-13 there are 4 districts, 11 communes and 39 villages and Survey team was conducted measured, Interviewed IOL and SES with affected people that affected in the COI ten meters each side from centerline, the total affected people around 65Km is 676 households, Interview with men are 381 households, interview with women are 101 households and did not meet owners are 472households. In 676 households affected residential land 1690.1m2, Commercial land is 1026.9m2; agricultural land is 44681.3m2, and affected 105 houses, House/Store 03, Store/ Shops/ Restaurant 114. Divorced 8 households, Widow 30 households, Disable 5 households, Poor is 96 households. Affected people total 676 household are legible APs that project affected people for NR 13, So all of properties affected by project will compensate base on replacement cost study result at currently market value after approved rate from IRC at MEF and for vulnerable group like Widow, Elderly, handicap, displace people and people income under national poverty line will haveassistance out of properties affected by project. Rumduol district were conducted with5 communes, 19 villages that affected with Project. Cutoff date: The project was limited the date of IOL is cutoff date that mead by no more structures will build in the COI. The projects still have option to minimize impact, should be keep the same COI or decrease COI for urban area depending on detail design of road engineering. Grievance redress and participation: The grievance redress process includes four stages. There are three stages before complaints may be elevated to a court of law as a last resort.

(xvii) First stage: APs will present their complaints andgrievances verbally or in writing to the CLAC. The CLAC will be obliged to provide immediate written confirmation of receiving the complaint. If after 15 days the aggrieved AP does not hear from the CLAC, or if the AP is not satisfied with the decision taken in the first stage, the complaint may be brought to the District Office.

(xviii) Second stage: The District Office has 15days within which to resolve the complaint to the satisfaction of all concerned. If the complaint cannot be solved at

Appendix 5

164

this stage, the District Office will bring the case to the Provincial Grievance Redress Committee.

(xix) Third stage: The Provincial GrievanceRedress Committee meets with the aggrieved party and tries to resolve the situation. The Committee may ask for a review of the DMS by the external monitor (EMO). Within 30 days of the submission of the grievance, the Committee must make a written decision and submit copies to the MPWT,PRS/IRC and the AP.

(xx) Final stage: If the aggrievedAP does not hear from the Provincial Grievance Redress Committee or is not satisfied, he/she will bring the case to Provincial Court. This is the final stage for adjudicating complaints. Within 30 days of the submission of the grievance, the Court must make a written decision and submit copies to the IMPWT, PRS/IRC and the AP. If any party is still unsatisfied with the Provincial Court judgment, he/she can bring the case to a higher-level court.

Attendants List

Province: Romeas Haek District


1 Haen Sakun M Deputy of District Romeas Haek



4 Prak Chhoet M People Samroung

5 Chang vay M People Samroung

6 Mao Sophal M People Samroung

7 Pich Chea M People Samroung

8 Saom Rin M People Thnal Peam

9 Nong Saly M People Samroung

10 Mork Savat M People Trapeang Rum Denh

11 Chheang Thou M People Trapeang Rum Denh

12 Srey Khean M People Samroung

13 Hun Ley M People Samroung

14 Chhaom Mao M People Samroung

15 Sam Ean M People Trapeang Rum Denh

16 Yu Voen M People Samroung

17 Ou Saphal M People Samroung

18 En Nary F People Trapeang Rum Denh

19 Taen Vibol M People Trapeang Rum Denh

20 Some May F People Trapeang Rum Denh

21 Meas Saroeurn M People Trapeang Rum Denh

22 Gnuy Nay Sim F People Samroung

23 Keo Tiem M People Trapeang Rum Denh

24 Pen Kosal M People Trapeang Rum Denh

25 Nung Huy F People Trapeang Rum Denh

26 Kuy Sath M People Trapeang Rum Denh

27 Chan Sambath F People Thnal Peam

28 Kung Savuth M People Trapeang Rum Denh

29 Nun Thy M People Samroung

30 Rach Bandol F People Samroung

Appendix 5

165



Mr. Seang Bora

31 Sok Sopheap M People Samroung

32 Koung Sinoeurn M People Trapeang Rum Denh

33 Keo Navy F People Samroung

34 Ean Savorn F People Samroung

35 Hing Manh F People Samroung

36 Hing Saron F People Samroung

37 Sao Chhao F People Samroung

38 Srey Navy F People Samroung

39 Lak Srey Noeurn F People Samroung

40 Keo Sokha F People Samroung

41 Pich Neang F People Samroung

42 Saom Navy F People Samroung

43 Svay Kapha F People Trapeang Rum Denh

44 Tith Raem F People Trapeang Rum Denh

45 Tith Kheng F People Trapeang Rum Denh

46 Svay Em F People Trapeang Rum Denh

47 chuon Thorn M People Trapeang Rum Denh

48 Hang Ham F People Trapeang Rum Denh

49 Chan Sambo F People Thnal Peam

50 Kroch Pha F People Thnal Peam

51 Ey Samey F People Samroung

52 Prum Phanna People Samroung

53 Him Dary People Samroung

54 Hing Saroeurn People Samroung

55 Chan Sokha People Thnal Peam

56 Hem Bopha People Samroung

57 Ros Ear People Thnal Peam

58 Keo Srey on People Thnal Peam

59 Um Chheng People Samroung

60 Keo Pha People Thnal Peam

61 Kung Ean People Trapeang Rum Denh

62 Preap Chantha People Thnal Peam

63 Chan Saban Village head Samroung

64

65

Appendix 5

166

Minutes Meeting for post-IOL at Kamchay Mear District-NR-13

- Date: Monday, 22/ June, 2011 - Place: Krabao Village - Time: 2h00 PM

I- Participants

1- Mr. Yung Cham (Chief of Krabaov Commune) 2- Mr. Yaet Yort (Pubblic Work of District)

3- Mr. Try Yorn (Resettlement Unit from MPWT 4- Mr. Seang Bora (Local Resettlement Consultant) 5- Commune Councils and Villages head)

II- AGENDA







Minimize impact of the project A- Mr. Yung Cham (Chief of Krabaov Commune)

Report name of District, Communes and village along NR-13 from border of Romeas Haek to National road number 8, have 1 commune and 2villages. and Participants during this meeting (see attach files ), and after that Chief of district transfer purpose of meeting to Mr. Try Yorn (Resettlement Unit from MPWT) and Local Resettlement Consultant to explain the primary result during IOL as following:


Thanks you very much for present of Deputy of district, Chief of Commune, Village headman and all of affected people that has present here today. Referring to population and Transportation were increased from day to day, The Government of Cambodia has requested the Asian Development Bank (ADB) project preparatory technical assistance (TA) to prepare the Provincial Roads Improvement Project. Among others, the project aims to rehabilitate NR 13 from NR-1 to NR-8, 65 km; construct a new cross border facility (CBF) at Prey Var-Mocva; NR 13 connecting NR 8 and NR1, between Komchay Mear NR150B, 53 and 151B which traverse Kampong Chhnang and Kampong Speu provinces, we need time to study more after submit to Government and ADB for approved

Appendix 5

167

after construction. The Pre-IOL was conducted in May 2011, Now, Post-IOL are inform the meeting to understanding the result of Inventory loss, But the result will introduce by Local Resettlement Consultant.

C- Mr. Seang Bora (Local Resettlement Consultant) Again, I would like to say thanks you very much for Chief of district, Commune Chiefs, Village headman and all of affected people that has present meeting here today. We was first meeting with authorities in May 2011, by not participated with for proposed authorities to inform to all APs know information about survey team to measured, interview APs along the NR 13 for conducted Inventory of Loss in area of Kamchay Mear district. Now, this is second meeting that have authorities and affected people participate to understand the Primary data result during conducted IOL. During conducted pre-IOL, the team were study along NR-13 there are 4 districts, 11 communes and 39 villages and Survey team was conducted measured, Interviewed IOL and SES with affected people that affected in the COI ten meters each side from centerline, the total affected people around 65Km is 676 households, Interview with men are 381 households, interview with women are 101 households and did not meet owners are 472households. In 676 households affected residential land 1690.1m2, Commercial land is 1026.9m2; agricultural land is 44681.3m2, and affected 105 houses, House/Store 03, Store/ Shops/ Restaurant 114. Divorced 8 households, Widow 30 households, Disable 5 households, Poor is 96 households. Affected people total 676 household are legible APs that project affected people for NR 13, So all of properties affected by project will compensate base on replacement cost study result at currently market value after approved rate from IRC at MEF and for vulnerable group like Widow, Elderly, handicap, displace people and people income under national poverty line will haveassistance out of properties affected by project. Rumduol district were conducted with5 communes, 19 villages that affected with Project. Cutoff date: The project was limited the date of IOL is cutoff date that mead by no more structures will build in the COI. The projects still have option to minimize impact, should be keep the same COI or decrease COI for urban area depending on detail design of road engineering. Grievance redress and participation: The grievance redress process includes four stages. There are three stages before complaints may be elevated to a court of law as a last resort.

(i) First stage: APs will present their complaints andgrievances verbally or in writing to the CLAC. The CLAC will be obliged to provide immediate written confirmation of receiving the complaint. If after 15 days the aggrieved AP does not hear from the CLAC, or if the AP is not satisfied with the decision taken in the first stage, the complaint may be brought to the District Office.

(ii) Second stage: The District Office has 15days within which to resolve the complaint to the satisfaction of all concerned. If the complaint cannot be solved at this stage, the District Office will bring the case to the Provincial Grievance Redress Committee.

Appendix 5

168

(iii) Third stage: The Provincial GrievanceRedress Committee meets with the aggrieved party and tries to resolve the situation. The Committee may ask for a review of the DMS by the external monitor (EMO). Within 30 days of the submission of the grievance, the Committee must make a written decision and submit copies to the MPWT, PRS/IRC and the AP.

(iv) Final stage: If the aggrievedAP does not hear from the Provincial Grievance Redress Committee or is not satisfied, he/she will bring the case to Provincial Court. This is the final stage for adjudicating complaints. Within 30 days of the submission of the grievance, the Court must make a written decision and submit copies to the, MPWT, PRS/IRC and the AP. If any party is still unsatisfied with the Provincial Court judgment, he/she can bring the case to a higher-level court.

Attendants List

Province: Kamchay Mear District No. Name Sex Position Organization/Village

1



4 Sam Sy M People Thbong Vat village

5 Ya F People Veal Smach village

6 Hem Sarith M People Thbong Vat village

7 Pon Run F People Veal Smach village

8 Yin Pin M People Veal Smach village

9 Yang Hean M People Thbong Vat village

10 Put Sam Ol M People Thbong Vat village

11 Lean Dorn M People Thbong Vat village

12 Kroch Phay F People Thbong Vat village

13 Sam Mao M People Thbong Vat village

14 Saom Loeurng M People Thbong Vat village

15 Sorn Vin F People Thbong Vat village

16 Yu Kim San F People Thbong Vat village

17 Heng Soteang F People Thbong Vat village

18 Horm Try F People Thbong Vat village

19 Mao Sopheap F People Thbong Vat village

20 Um Veasna M People Veal Smach village

21 Heng Sokny F People Thbong Vat village

22 Yum Rom F People Thbong Vat village

23 Pich San F People Veal Smach village

24 Ma Kear F People Thbong Vat village

25 Chin Sovan M People Veal Smach village

26 Hing Samon M People Thbong Vat village

27 Kung Malate M People Thbong Vat village

28 Put Samnang M People Thbong Vat village

Appendix 5

169

29 Him Salom M People Veal Smach village

30 Vuth Srey F People Veal Smach village

31 Thoeurn Los M People Veal Smach village

32 NHoung Saran M People Veal Smach village

33 Sarin Hay M People Veal Smach village

34 Oun Sa Em M People Veal Smach village

35 Ney Cham Nan M People Thbong Vat village

36 Khal Khun M People Veal Smach village

37 Yus Tha M People Veal Smach village

38 Saom Luy M People Thbong Vat village

39 Yung Saet M People Thbong Vat village

40 Nguy Heang M People Thbong Vat village

41 Ream Phanna M People Thbong Vat village

42 Sum Chan M People Thbong Vat village

43 Saom Thuch M People Thbong Vat village

44 Chhit Sras M People Thbong Vat village

45 Huot Saran M People Thbong Vat village

46 Rith Heng M People Thbong Vat village

47 Nhiek Laly F People Thbong Vat village

48 Horm Tuel M People Thbong Vat village

49 Nhiek Yoeurn F People Thbong Vat village

50 Neth Bopha F People Thbong Vat village

51 Em Salouth F People Thbong Vat village

52 Nhe Sokly F People Veal Smach village

53 Khuon Yon M People Thbong Vat village

54 Bun Mon F People Thbong Vat village

55 Chon Samphost F People Thbong Vat village

56 Reth Soeurn M People Thbong Vat village

57 Oung Thy F People Thbong Vat village

58 Neth Nov F People Thbong Vat village

59 Saom Yoeurng F People Thbong Vat village

60 Sao Sovin F People Thbong Vat village

61 Meas Savoeurn F People Thbong Vat village

62 Kem Siban F People Thbong Vat village

63 Saom Saveth F People Thbong Vat village

64 Khem Sreng M People Thbong Vat village

65 Mey Sok Kem F People Thbong Vat village

66 Hem Phan F People Thbong Vat village

Appendix 5

170



Mr. Seang Bora

67 Von Canal F People Thbong Vat village

68 Pon Kheng F People Thbong Vat village

69 Py Mom F People Thbong Vat village

70 Hong Heng M People Thbong Vat village

71 Toeur Nay San F People Thbong Vat village

72 Se San Ath F People Thbong Vat village

73 Bean Han F People Veal Smach village

74 Yung Chonh M People Thbong Vat village

Appendix 6

171

PUBLIC INFORMATION BROCHURE

Cambodia Provincial Roads Improvement Project

PUBLIC INFORMATION BOOKLET

1. QUESTION: What is the Asian Development Bank (ADB) Cambodia Provincial Roads Improvement Project?

ANSWER: The Royal Government of Cambodia (RGC) proposes to use funds from the Asian Development Bank (ADB) to improve Provincial Road Improvement Project No. 314D, 13 at Svay Rieng and Prey Veng province and road numbers, 150B, 53 and 151B at Kampong Chhnang and Kampong Speu province, and to upgrade and expand the border facilities at Prey Var in Kampong Rou district (Svay Rieng province). The TA is part of a regional project to improve road links between Cambodia and Viet Nam on road No. 314D from NR-1 at Svay Teab to Kampong Rou district and NR-13 from National road No. 1 to National Road No.8 at Prey Veng province, NR-150B,53 and 151B from Taches to Amleang commune in Tphong district (Kampong Speu province).

The project will also support a sustainable road maintenance regime in the Ministry ofPublic Works and Transport (MPWT), HIV/AIDS and human trafficking prevention program, road safety and climate change adaptation measures.

2. QUESTION: Who is responsible for the Project?

ANSWER: The RGC represented by the Inter-Ministerial Resettlement Committee

(IRC) will supervise the implementation of the Resettlement Plan (RP). The Ministry of Public Works and Transport (MPWT) has established a Social and Environmental Office (SEO) to implement and monitor the implementation of the RP for affected land, structures, crops and trees along the road.

3. QUESTION: Are the improvements of the roads and cross-border facility intended to benefit us?

ANSWER: Yes. The roads will be improved to paved condition to provide a safer, cost-effective provincial road network with all-year access to markets and other social services for provincial centers in the project areas Improved roads will enable the transportation of goods and people to be quicker, more efficient and cheaper. The new and improved roads will improve inter-provincial connectivity as well as cross-border trade and movement at the Prey Var-Moc Va border crossing point.

4. QUESTION: If there are road construction activities in our locality, will we be affected?

ANSWER: There will be three main types of land acquisition impacts: (i) expansion of the existing roads within the existing road rights of way; (ii) creation of a 1.2km new alignment on PR150B at Chaung Moung commune requiring privately owned farming land; and (iii) expansion of the Cross Border Facility at Prey Var requiring approximately 5ha of land, of which 2.5ha is privately owned.

As part of the Provincial Road Improvement Project, MPWT will establish a Corridor of Impact (COI) on 10m each side of the

existing road. The COI is narrower than the road right-of-way (ROW) that has been established along road section. The COI has a width of maximum 20 m (10 m either side of the road centerline). MPWT will place demarcation markers on the ground before a detailed measurement survey (DMS) starts. Its purpose is to define an area reserved for the road improvements, and to establish who is affected by the Project.

Everyone that is occupying or using land in the COI must move out of the COI. All people must also remove from land acquired to expand the border facilities or for the road realignment. During detailed design, every effort will be made to minimize the impacts.

A preliminary census and inventory of losses (IOL) was conducted in May-June 2011 to determine the potentially affected persons and the severity of impacts on their properties. Based on the IOL, a preliminary list of eligible persons and their losses has been prepared, and is available in your commune office. After the detailed design for road improvements is finalized and the COI demarcated, DMS will be conducted and a final list of eligible persons prepared.

5. QUESTION: What if my land will be affected by the Project?

ANSWER: Acquired privately owned land will be compensated at replacement cost which is market value plus reasonable transaction costs. Land within the existing road right of way will not be compensated. However, those losing use of productive (farming) land within the road right of way

Appendix 6

172

will be entitled to assistance for loss of land use of productive land.

6. QUESTION: What are the entitlements that we have in order to be compensated?

ANSWER: Cut off dates for entitlement to compensation and assistance have been established for each project section corresponding to the date of completion of the inventory of losses. The respective cut off dates are 20 May 2011 for PR314D; 2 June 2011 for NR13 and CBF; 12 June 2011 for PR150B; 17 June 2011 for NR13; and 19 June 2011 for PR151B. Those persons who have occupied and used the land prior to this cut off date are entitled to compensation if the project construction affects their land and/or structures. Anyone who encroaches and occupies the land after the cut off date will not be eligible for compensation or assistance.

7. QUESTION: Does compensation apply to my affected houses or structures?

ANSWER: Yes. Houses and structures that will be affected by the Project shall be compensated at replacement cost without deduction for depreciation or salvageable materials. Partially affected houses will be compensated for the lost affected portion as well as repair costs. Other structures (e.g. fences, wells, pavement) will also be compensated at replacement cost.

8. QUESTION: What about my crops and trees?

ANSWER: For annual crops, affected persons will be given advance notice that the land on which their crops are planted

will be used by the Project and that they must harvest their crops in time. If standing crops are ripening and cannot be harvested, eligible affected persons can be compensated for the loss of the unharvested crops at the current market value. For perennial crops, affected persons will be compensated for the loss of fruit and timber trees at replacement value, which value will take account of lost potential income and time required to re-establish the perennial trees. This will compensate for lost income until the newly planted seedlings bear fruit. Affected persons will be awarded the full value of any lost crops/fruit where the plants are near or ready to harvest.

9. QUESTION: What about public property resources?

ANSWER: Affected buildings and structures will be restored to original or better condition.

10. QUESTION: If in case there will be relocation of houses or businesses involved, how can the Project help me rebuild my house during relocation?

ANSWER: Affected persons will have the option of moving back outside the corridor of impact but within the road right of way, or moving outside the right of way altogether. Those relocating within the road right of way will be permitted to remain there until theland is needed by the Government for any future public works but will not be permitted to build permanent structures. If such future displacement is required those required to relocate will be entitled to similar forms of assistance as provided under this

resettlement plan. Those relocating outside the road right of way altogether under this project will be entitled to higher levels of support compared to those relocating within the road right of way.

Affected persons will receive compensation at replacement cost for affected structures plus transitional allowances to assist in the process of relocating. Transitional assistance will consist of: (i) Transportation allowance; (ii) One time assistance allowance of $100 if movingback within the road right of way or $200 if moving outside the road right of way; (iii) income loss allowance for disrupted businesses; and (iv) additional assistance for vulnerable households. Renters will be eligible for three months rental assistance.

The specific amounts for compensation rates as well as allowances and assistance will be advised at the time the resettlement plan is updated.

11. QUESTION: If in case our livelihoods are affected, how can the Project help me restore my livelihood and living standards?

ANSWER: The census and detailed measurement survey (DMS) will take note of the livelihoods of affected persons and any impacts the Project may have. The Project will provide various forms of assistance to enable affected people to restore their livelihoods and living conditions to at least pre-project levels. For vulnerable households (e.g. those classed as poor, disabled, etc.), the Project will seek to improve living standards to at least minimum national standards. Such forms of

Appendix 6

173

assistance will include: (i) one time assistance allowance to households losing more than 10% of the productive assets or being required to relocate their houses or shops outside the corridor of impact depending of the type and severity of impact; (ii) for those losing loss of use of productive land within the road right of way, cash assistance for loss of land use; (iii) cash assistance to cover transportation costs; (iv) cash grant for temporary disruption to business income for affected shops/stalls; (v) potentially other forms of income restoration measures to be determined during updating of the resettlement plan in consultation with those affected; and (vi) additional special assistance to vulnerable households.

In addition the Project will seek to maximize project work opportunities to adults in the affected local communities (both men and women) during the implementation phases. Such opportunities will be announced in the local areas.

12. QUESTION: What is the detailed measurement survey and when will it be conducted?

ANSWER: The DMS is a detailed survey of 100% of affected persons to document all affected assets including land, houses, shops, other structures, crops and trees. It establishes the official list of affected persons who are eligible for compensation and other assistance. It will be conducted after detailed engineering for the road and border facilities is completed, and the COI has been marked on the ground. The activity will be carried out early in the project implementation stage in 2012. The activity

will only be carried out in the presence of the affected persons. The affected persons and the local authorities will be informed prior to the activity.

13. QUESTION: How will the Project consult with me and provide information?

ANSWER: The Project has prepared a communication and consultation plan. The Project will keep local communities informed of significant activities. Regular information will be provided to the commune offices, village chiefs and local community-based organizations as well as other culturally recognized community leaders. The local commune offices will maintain a public notice board where significant information and schedules will be posted. In addition to this affected households will be consulted directly through public consultation meetings on significant matters affecting them. Such public consultation meetings will take place (i) prior to the conduct of the DMS (to advise survey schedules and procedures), (ii) following the DMS (to advise of DMS results and proposed mitigation measures), (iii) during preparation of the updated resettlement plan (to identify appropriate livelihood restoration measures, advise of compensation rates and details of allowances and assistance measures as well as details of resettlement arrangements); and (iv) on-going through implementation of the resettlement plan. In addition the Project will publically disclose the approved updated resettlement plan through a public information brochure (distributed to all affected households), by

providing a translated version to each local district and commune office for public access and by uploading it on ADB’s website.

14. QUESTION: If I disagree or problems arise during project implementation such as compensation, technical, and other project-related issues, do I have the right to voice my complaint?

ANSWER: Yes. If the affected person is not clear about or not satisfied with the compensation package offered or, if for any reason, the compensation does not materialize according to the agreed schedule, the affected person has the right to lodge a complaint. The grievance redress mechanism consists of a four stage process as follows:

First Stage, Commune Level: An aggrieved person may bring his/her complaint to the commune leader. The commune leader together with the representative/s of the Provincial Resettlement Sub-Committee Working Group (PRSC-WG) coming from the district offices will call for a meeting of the Group to decide on a course of action to resolve the complaint within 15 days following the lodging of the complaint by the aggrieved person. The commune leader is responsible for documenting and keeping file of all complaints that are coursed through it. Second Stage, Provincial Resettlement Sub-committee Working Group: If after 15 days the aggrieved person does not hear from the commune leader, or if the person is not satisfied with the decision taken by the commune and district officials, the

Appendix 6

174

complaint can be brought to the office of the PRSC-WG (provincial level), either in writing or verbally. It is incumbent upon said member of the PRSC-WG to notify the other members of the Group. The Team Leader of the PRSC-WG will call for a meeting of the Group to decide on a course of action to resolve the complaint within 15 days following the lodging of the complaint by the aggrieved person. The PRSC-WG is responsible for documenting and keeping file of all complaints that are coursed through it. Third Stage, Inter-ministerial Resettlement Committee: If after 15 days the aggrieved person does not hear from the PRSC-WG, or if the person is not satisfied with the decision taken by the PRSC-WG, the complaint may be brought to the office of the IRC, through the IRC-RD, either in writing or verbally. The IRC has 15 days within which to resolve the complaint to the satisfaction of all concerned. The IRC is responsible for documenting and keeping file of all complaints that reaches it. Final Stage, Court of Law: If after 15 days following the lodging of the complaint the aggrieved person is not satisfied with the decision taken by the IRC, or if the person does not hear from the IRC, the complaint may be brought to a court of law for adjudication. The rules of court will be followed in the resolution of the complaint. 13. QUESTION: When is the project expect to start?

ANSWER: The project is expected to commence in April 2012. The updated resettlement plan will require at least 4 months to prepare and site clearance is

expected to commence in the 4th quarter of 2012. Affected communities will be kept informed of updated activity schedules from May 2012.

14. QUESTION: How will you know if these undertakings are kept and the objectives of this Project are met?

ANSWER: All project activities will be monitored by: The Social and Environment Office of the Project Management Unit-3 of the Ministry of Public Works and Transport and by an External Monitoring Agency (EMA).

Monthly Report and Quarterly Reports will be prepared and submitted to ADB. A post-resettlement impact evaluation will also be undertaken to assess whether impacts of the Project have been mitigated adequately and the pre-project standard of living of affected persons have been restored as a result of the resettlement and project. ADB will also monitor these activities in its regular supervision missions during project implementation. Semi-annual reports of the EMA will be disclosed to affected communities.

15. QUESTION: Are there any other documents available to know more about the Project and resettlement issues?

ANSWER: The draft RP prepared during the feasibility studies for the Project can be obtained from the commune, district and provincial offices. Following detailed engineering design and the DMS, the RP will be updated and the final version will be available in these offices.

16. If you have further queries and suggestions, please contact us at:

(i) Provincial Department of Public Works (PDPW) Resettlement Sub-Committee in the following provinces: Svay Rieng, Kampong Chhnang. Prey Veng and Kampong Speu Ministry of Public Works and Transport (Phnom Penh) .

(ii) Project Management Unit 3, Provincial Roads Improvement Project

Attention: Social and Environment Office

Address: 4th Floor, Eastern Building,

Corner Norodom Blvd. & Street 106, Phnom Penh

Phone: [add]

Email: [add]

(iii) Inter-Ministerial Resettlement Committee, Resettlement Department, Ministry of Economy and Finance (Phnom Penh) – Tel/Fax: 023 42 66 82

(iv) Asian Development Bank Resident Mission - Phnom Penh. Tel: (023) 215 805,

Fax: 023 215 807

RP: Cambodia: Provincial Roads Improvement Project (314D ... · Resettlement Plan . November 2011 ....

Documents

Transcript of RP: Cambodia: Provincial Roads Improvement Project (314D ... · Resettlement Plan . November 2011 ....