Rowe Entertainment v. William Morris Agency et al. (98-8272) -- Order from Judge Patterson...
Click here to load reader
-
Upload
mr-alkebu-lan -
Category
Documents
-
view
285 -
download
1
description
Transcript of Rowe Entertainment v. William Morris Agency et al. (98-8272) -- Order from Judge Patterson...
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
-----------------------------------------------------------)( ROWE ENTERTAINMENT, et al.
Plaintiffs, - against
THE WILLIAM MORRIS AGENCY INC., et al.
Defendants.
-----------------------------------------------------------)(
ROBERT P. PATTERSON, JR., U.S.D.J.
On Saturday, June 8, 2012, the Court received an e-mail sent by Plaintiff Leonard Rowe
("Plaintiff') with a letter attached addressed to Michael Zweig. Esq. of Loeb & Loeb, LLP dated
June 4, 2012. On June 9, 2012, the Court received an additional e-mail from Plaintiff with a
letter attached addressed to Jeffrey Klein, Esq. of Wei1, Gotshal & Magnes, LLP dated June 4,
2012. The letters demand the withdrawal of affidavits filed in a case closed by judgments
entered by the Court on February 7, 2005. (ECF No. 676, 678.) Plaintiffs' appeal was denied by
the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. (ECF No. 745.)
Plaintiff is reminded the only matter that the Court has under consideration is his motion
under Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to reopen the case which was closed on
February 7, 2005, based on his claim of newly discovered favorable evidence which certain
attorneys representing him failed to disclose to Plaintiffs, or to other counsel representing
Plaintiffs during the prior litigation.
Since Plaintiffs motion under Rule 60(b) has not been granted, Plaintiff has no standing
at this time to try to use court procedures to further his cause or for discovery purposes.
Accordingly, the e-mailed letters to Weil, Gotshal & Magnes, LLP and Loeb & Loeb, LLP are
deemed a nullity and will not be considered by the Court. Plaintiff Leonard Rowe is being
98 CV 8272 (RPP)
ORDER
warned that during the pendency of this motion any further actions of this type will be
considered sanctionable.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: New York, New York June ta., 2012
~~ff/LJ:Robert P. Patterson, Jr.
U.S.D.J.
Copies of this order were mailed to:
Leonard Rowe 5805 State Bridge Road, Suite 350 Johns Creek, GA 30097