ROUTE 72 BRIDGE IMPROVEMENTSROUTE 72 BRIDGE IMPROVEMENTS

TP 708TP 708

Pre-Proposal MeetingPre-Proposal MeetingMay 2, 2008May 2, 2008

AgendaAgenda

IntroductionIntroduction Existing ConditionsExisting Conditions Preferred AlternativePreferred Alternative QuestionsQuestions

Project LocationProject Location

Project LocationProject Location

Marsha Drive IntersectionMarsha Drive Intersection

Hilliards ThorofareHilliards Thorofare

Manahawkin Bay BridgeManahawkin Bay Bridge

East and West ThorofareEast and West Thorofare

Long Beach Island Business Long Beach Island Business DistrictDistrict

Typical Bridge Lane Typical Bridge Lane ConfigurationConfiguration

Existing Bay BridgeExisting Bay Bridge

2500’ Long, 17 spans2500’ Long, 17 spans 4-Girder System with Transverse 4-Girder System with Transverse

Floor Beams and DeckFloor Beams and Deck Tall Hammerhead Piers on Timber Tall Hammerhead Piers on Timber

Pile FoundationsPile Foundations Generally Good ConditionGenerally Good Condition

Bay Bridge - Typical Fatigue Bay Bridge - Typical Fatigue CracksCracks

Bay Bridge - Fatigue RepairsBay Bridge - Fatigue Repairs

Trestle BridgesTrestle Bridges

Simple Span Precast Concrete I Simple Span Precast Concrete I BeamsBeams

Hilliards Thorofare 475’, 11 spansHilliards Thorofare 475’, 11 spans West Thorofare 368’, 9 spansWest Thorofare 368’, 9 spans East Thorofare 485’, 11 spansEast Thorofare 485’, 11 spans Timber Pile Bent PiersTimber Pile Bent Piers

Trestle BridgesTrestle Bridges

Generally Good ConditionGenerally Good Condition

Trestle Bridges - Typical Pier Trestle Bridges - Typical Pier SpallsSpalls

Trestle BridgesTrestle BridgesUndermining of BearingsUndermining of Bearings

Trestle BridgesTrestle BridgesTypical Pier RepairsTypical Pier Repairs

AlternativesAlternatives

Original IPA Developed in 2005Original IPA Developed in 2005 Original IPA Revised by Smart Original IPA Revised by Smart

SolutionsSolutions

Marsha Drive Improvements - Marsha Drive Improvements - IPAIPA

Add Turning Lane at Marsha DriveAdd Turning Lane at Marsha Drive Prohibit left turn from 72 westboundProhibit left turn from 72 westbound

Previous Previous IPAIPA

Bay BridgeBay BridgeNew parallel BridgeNew parallel BridgeReplace Existing Replace Existing

SuperstructureSuperstructure2 Lanes Full Shoulders 2 Lanes Full Shoulders

each wayeach wayIn the future can In the future can

accommodate 3 lanes accommodate 3 lanes each wayeach way

Revised IPARevised IPABay BridgeBay BridgeNew parallel BridgeNew parallel Bridge2 Lanes and Shoulders 2 Lanes and Shoulders

(wide enough to carry 4 (wide enough to carry 4 11’ Lanes for the 11’ Lanes for the rehabilitation of the rehabilitation of the existing structure)existing structure)

Rehabilitate the Rehabilitate the existing superstructureexisting superstructure

Bike/ped Bike/ped accommodationsaccommodations

Previous Previous IPAIPA

Trestle BridgesTrestle BridgesReplace 3 Trestle Replace 3 Trestle BridgesBridges

Temporary Trestle Temporary Trestle for MPTfor MPT

2 lanes and Full 2 lanes and Full Shoulders each wayShoulders each way

In the future can In the future can accommodate 3 lanes accommodate 3 lanes each wayeach way

Revised IPARevised IPATrestle BridgesTrestle Bridges

Rehabilitate 3 Rehabilitate 3 trestle bridgestrestle bridges

DeckDeckPiersPiersSuperstructureSuperstructureBike/pedBike/pedaccommodationsaccommodations

Preferred lane Preferred lane configuration to beconfiguration to bedetermined determined

Contract SequenceContract Sequence

Cost SummaryCost Summary

PROPOSED IPA

CONTRACTNo.

Total Construction

Cost

CONTRACT 1 Bay Bridge - Minor Rehab & Marsha Drive Intersection 7.34

CONTRACT 2 New Bay Bridge 110.08

CONTRACT 3 Trestle Bridges - Major Rehab 13.57

CONTRACT 4 Bay Bridge - Major Rehab 32.00

* $163 mill

* Price reflects 2007 dollars* Price reflects 2007 dollars

PREVIOUS IPA $235 mill

Proposal ScoringProposal Scoring

STEP 1: Technical ProposalSTEP 1: Technical Proposal40%40%

STEP 2: Oral PresentationSTEP 2: Oral Presentation 60%60%

Federal Goal of 15.6% ESBEFederal Goal of 15.6% ESBE

Technical Proposal Evaluation Technical Proposal Evaluation CriteriaCriteria

Project ManagerProject Manager 20% 20% Key StaffKey Staff 20% 20% Project ApproachProject Approach 40% 40% Firm’s Capability / PerformanceFirm’s Capability / Performance 20% 20%

Oral Presentation Evaluation Oral Presentation Evaluation CriteriaCriteria

Team OrganizationTeam Organization 40 pts.40 pts. Results Oriented StrategiesResults Oriented Strategies 70 pts.70 pts. Project Schedule/Network LogicProject Schedule/Network Logic 50 pts.50 pts. Risk Analysis StrategiesRisk Analysis Strategies 30 pts.30 pts. Project Management StrategiesProject Management Strategies 20 pts.20 pts.

(Scope, schedule, budget and Quality)(Scope, schedule, budget and Quality)

Total Points for Oral PresentationTotal Points for Oral Presentation 210 pts.210 pts.

Questions?Questions?