Rotterdam Day 2

63
Singapore Math in Rotterdam 2 Opleiding Singapore rekenspecialist Review of Day 1 What are some features of Singapore Math and its theoretical underpinnings. On Day 2, we look at the focus on visualization and the model method.

description

We focus on the bar model.

Transcript of Rotterdam Day 2

Page 1: Rotterdam Day 2

Singapore Math in Rotterdam 2Opleiding Singapore rekenspecialist

Review of Day 1What are some features of Singapore Math and its theoretical underpinnings.

On Day 2, we look at the focus on visualization and the model method.

Page 2: Rotterdam Day 2

Review of Day 1

Yeap Ban Har, Ph.D.

Marshall Cavendish InstituteSingapore

[email protected]

Page 3: Rotterdam Day 2

Variations

Tasks are varied in a systematic way to ensure that average and struggling learners can learn well.

Page 4: Rotterdam Day 2

Math in Focus 2A

Page 5: Rotterdam Day 2

Math in Focus 2A

Page 6: Rotterdam Day 2

Math in Focus 2A

Page 7: Rotterdam Day 2

Zoltan Dienes

The three lessons include mathematical variations within the same grade.

This is referred to as a spiral approach.

Page 8: Rotterdam Day 2

It is likely that a teacher will start this unit using the sticks. This is followed by the use of base ten blocks. Finally, non-proportionate materials such as coins are used. In each of these lessons, the teacher is likely to introduce the following five notations in turn – place value chart, expanded notation, number in numerals, number in words and the tens and ones notation.

The question is what is an appropriate sequence? Should the place value chart be used first? Or the expanded notation? Give your reasons.

Place Value Chart Expanded Notation

Numerals WordsTens and Ones Notation Primary Mathematics

Page 9: Rotterdam Day 2

Zoltan Dienes

This lesson include perceptual variations. This is Dienes’ idea of multiple embodiment. The

mathematical concept is constant while the materials used to embody it are varied.

Page 10: Rotterdam Day 2

Jerome Bruner

Bruner advised teachers to use the CPA Approach in teaching mathematics.

Page 11: Rotterdam Day 2
Page 12: Rotterdam Day 2

Richard SkempSkemp distinguished between instrumental

understanding from relational understanding to encourage teachers to teach for conceptual

understanding.

Page 13: Rotterdam Day 2

conceptual

Bina Bangsa School, Semarang, Indonesia

skemp’s

understandingtheory

Page 14: Rotterdam Day 2

Example 2

Division in Other Grade Levels

Page 15: Rotterdam Day 2

My Pals Are Here! Mathematics 3A

Page 16: Rotterdam Day 2

My Pals Are Here! Mathematics 3A

Page 17: Rotterdam Day 2

My Pals Are Here! Mathematics 3A

Page 18: Rotterdam Day 2

My Pals Are Here! Mathematics 3A

Page 19: Rotterdam Day 2

My Pals Are Here! Mathematics 3A

Page 20: Rotterdam Day 2

My Pals Are Here! Mathematics 3A

Page 21: Rotterdam Day 2

My Pals Are Here! Mathematics 3A

Page 22: Rotterdam Day 2

My Pals Are Here! Mathematics 3A

Page 23: Rotterdam Day 2

My Pals Are Here! Mathematics 3A

Page 24: Rotterdam Day 2
Page 25: Rotterdam Day 2

Keys Grade School, Manila, The Philippines

Page 26: Rotterdam Day 2

Keys Grade School, Manila, The Philippines

Page 27: Rotterdam Day 2

The Bar Model Methodde strookmodel

Yeap Ban Har, Ph.D.

Marshall Cavendish InstituteSingapore

[email protected]

Page 28: Rotterdam Day 2

Mathematics Curriculum Framework

Mathematical Problem

Solving

Attitudes

Metacognition

Proc

esse

s

Concepts

SkillsNumericalAlgebraic

GeometricalStatistical

ProbabilisticAnalytical

Reasoning, communication & connectionsThinking skills & heuristicsApplication & modelling

Numerical calculationAlgebraic

manipulationSpatial visualization

Data analysisMeasurement

Use of mathematical tools

Estimation

Monitoring of one’s own thinkingSelf-regulation of learning

BeliefsInterest

AppreciationConfidence

Perseverance

Page 29: Rotterdam Day 2

Wellington Primary School

visualization

Page 30: Rotterdam Day 2

Primary Mathematics Standards Edition

Page 31: Rotterdam Day 2
Page 32: Rotterdam Day 2

John had 1.5 m of copper wire. He cut some of the wire to bend into the shape shown in the figure below. In the figure, there are 6 equilateral triangles and the length of XY is 19 cm. How much of the copper wire was left? 

19 cm x 5 = 95 cm

150 cm – 95 cm = 105 cm

Page 33: Rotterdam Day 2

There was an interesting discussion on this problem. There was an explanation that a + b + c = 19 cm. Then there was an assumption that a : b : c = 4 : 2 : 1 which was met with rebuttals such as there is no need to know a : b : c as well as the point that a : b : c can be determined by measuring or folding.  

Page 34: Rotterdam Day 2

The Bar Model Methodde strookmodel

Yeap Ban Har, Ph.D.

Marshall Cavendish InstituteSingapore

[email protected]

Page 35: Rotterdam Day 2

Ali has 3 sweets. Billy has 5 sweets.How many sweets do they have altogether?

Ali

Billy

Page 36: Rotterdam Day 2

Ali has 3 sweets. Billy has 5 sweets.How many sweets do they have altogether?

Ali

Billy

Page 37: Rotterdam Day 2
Page 38: Rotterdam Day 2

Introduction

The focus is on the bar model method.

Page 39: Rotterdam Day 2

Materials developed by Poon Yain Ping

Page 40: Rotterdam Day 2

Materials developed by Poon Yain Ping

Page 41: Rotterdam Day 2

Materials developed by Poon Yain Ping

Page 42: Rotterdam Day 2

Summary

The three basic situations are part-whole, comparison and before-after situations.

Page 43: Rotterdam Day 2

Materials developed by Poon Yain Ping

Page 44: Rotterdam Day 2

Materials developed by Poon Yain Ping

The class decided that this was

impossible. The teacher asked the class to change this to another

number to make the situation possible. We

discussed when it is 3, 4 and 5

times.

A student gave an incorrect solution

for the second part. The teacher asked students to write a question

for which this would be a correct

solution.

Page 45: Rotterdam Day 2

Summary

We discussed how to use students’ responses to make the lesson focus on depth. We also saw how a

problem can be modified to challenge learners.

Page 46: Rotterdam Day 2

Materials developed by Poon Yain Ping

Page 47: Rotterdam Day 2

Materials developed by Poon Yain Ping

Page 48: Rotterdam Day 2

Materials developed by Poon Yain Ping

Page 49: Rotterdam Day 2

School Assessment

women

men

Page 50: Rotterdam Day 2

School Assessment

women

men 12

45

Page 51: Rotterdam Day 2

School Assessment

women

men 12

45

6 6

?

women

men

Page 52: Rotterdam Day 2

Further Practice for Model Method

Page 53: Rotterdam Day 2

Materials developed by Poon Yain Ping

Page 54: Rotterdam Day 2

Materials developed by Poon Yain Ping

Page 55: Rotterdam Day 2

Materials developed by Poon Yain Ping

Page 56: Rotterdam Day 2

Materials developed by Poon Yain Ping

Page 57: Rotterdam Day 2

Materials developed by Poon Yain Ping

Page 58: Rotterdam Day 2

Materials developed by Poon Yain Ping

Page 59: Rotterdam Day 2

Materials developed by Poon Yain Ping

Page 60: Rotterdam Day 2

Materials developed by Poon Yain Ping

Page 61: Rotterdam Day 2

Materials developed by Poon Yain Ping

Page 62: Rotterdam Day 2

Materials developed by Poon Yain Ping

Page 63: Rotterdam Day 2

Materials developed by Poon Yain Ping