Roth Engineering, LLC

32
March 1, 2021 Backer Farm, Township of Mendham Page 1 of 2 Roth Engineering, LLC 52 Quail Run Long Valley, NJ 07853 Phone: 973-715-7427 [email protected] March 1, 2021 Via Mail & Email: Wendy Parrinello ([email protected]) Township of Mendham Health Department 2 West Main Street Brookside, NJ 07926 Re: Application for Subsurface Sewage Disposal System Proposed Farm Based Brewery at Backer Farm Block 109, Lot 23 Township of Mendham, Morris County, New Jersey Roth Engineering Project # 200901 Dear Ms. Parrinello: Backer Farm, located at 32 Ironia Road in the Township of Mendham, is a permanently preserved farmland under the New Jersey Farmland Preservation Program. The site contains various structures, fields and growing areas related to the farm use along with a single-family dwelling containing three bedrooms. The project proposes to convert the existing barn into a farm-based brewery on the preserved farm premises. The project will require an alternate design Treatment Works Approval (TWA) pursuant to N.J.A.C. 7:9A Standards for Individual Subsurface Sewage Disposal Systems. We are hereby submitting for your review of the project including endorsement of the WQM006A Form as part of the TWA. Please find the necessary items below for your review of the septic application: A check (No. 292) in the amount of $560.00 made payable to Township of Mendham for the application fee. A check (No. 293) in the amount of $440.00 made payable to Township of Mendham for the permit fee. A check (No. 294) in the amount of $1,200.00 made payable to Township of Mendham for the escrow fee. Four (4) copies of the NJDEP Appendix B Forms - Standard Forms for Submissions. WQM006A Form including design flow calculations that requires your endorsement under Section 11.

Transcript of Roth Engineering, LLC

Page 1: Roth Engineering, LLC

March 1, 2021 Backer Farm, Township of Mendham Page 1 of 2

Roth Engineering, LLC 52 Quail Run Long Valley, NJ 07853 Phone: 973-715-7427 [email protected]

March 1, 2021

Via Mail & Email: Wendy Parrinello ([email protected])

Township of Mendham Health Department 2 West Main Street Brookside, NJ 07926

Re: Application for Subsurface Sewage Disposal System Proposed Farm Based Brewery at Backer Farm Block 109, Lot 23 Township of Mendham, Morris County, New Jersey Roth Engineering Project # 200901

Dear Ms. Parrinello:

Backer Farm, located at 32 Ironia Road in the Township of Mendham, is a permanently preserved farmland under the New Jersey Farmland Preservation Program. The site contains various structures, fields and growing areas related to the farm use along with a single-family dwelling containing three bedrooms. The project proposes to convert the existing barn into a farm-based brewery on the preserved farm premises. The project will require an alternate design Treatment Works Approval (TWA) pursuant to N.J.A.C. 7:9A Standards for Individual Subsurface Sewage Disposal Systems. We are hereby submitting for your review of the project including endorsement of the WQM006A Form as part of the TWA. Please find the necessary items below for your review of the septic application: • A check (No. 292) in the amount of $560.00 made payable to Township of Mendham

for the application fee. • A check (No. 293) in the amount of $440.00 made payable to Township of Mendham

for the permit fee. • A check (No. 294) in the amount of $1,200.00 made payable to Township of

Mendham for the escrow fee. • Four (4) copies of the NJDEP Appendix B Forms - Standard Forms for Submissions. • WQM006A Form including design flow calculations that requires your endorsement

under Section 11.

Page 2: Roth Engineering, LLC

March 1, 2021 Backer Farm, Township of Mendham Page 2 of 2

• Four (4) copies of the letter prepared by Premier Tech dated February 26, 2021 that confirms the design of advanced pretreatment device (Ecoflo Coco Filter) meets their approval as per N.J.A.C. 7:9A.

• Four (4) copies of the Supplementary Calculations for Septic Permit Application dated February 26, 2021.

• Four (4) copies of the Septic Design Plans (2 Sheets) dated February 26, 2021.

• Four (4) copies of the Architectural Plans for the Proposed Brewery (2 Sheets) prepared by Byrne Design Associates dated January 11, 2021.

• Four (4) copies of the Architectural Plans for the Existing and Proposed Greenhouse (1 Sheet) prepared by Byrne Design Associates dated January 7, 2021.

Should you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact our office.

Best Regards,

Michael J. Roth, P.E., P.P. [email protected] (973) 715-7427 Enclosures via email:

Jessica Freer of County of Morris Office of Health Management ([email protected]) Stuart Backer of Backer Farm ([email protected]) Fred Backer of Backer Farm ([email protected]) Derick Backer of Backer Farm ([email protected]) Nicole Voigt of Shanahan & Voigt, LLC ([email protected]) Frank Pinto of Pinto Consulting, LLC ([email protected]) Theodore Bayer, PE of Bayer-Risse Engineering ([email protected]) Jay Grant, Grant Homes ([email protected])

Page 3: Roth Engineering, LLC
Page 4: Roth Engineering, LLC
Page 5: Roth Engineering, LLC

N.J.A.C. 7:9A – Appendix B Forms

2 01/2010

Form 2a General Site Evaluation Data

Lot: _________________ Block: ______________

1. Name of Site Evaluator: ________________________________________________________________________

2. Business Address of Site Evaluator: _______________________________________________________________

3. Business Phone Number of Site Evaluator:__________________________________________________________

4. Special site limitations identified (check appropriate categories):

Flood Plains ______ Bedrock Outcrops ______ Wetlands ______ Excessively Stony ______ Disturbed Ground ______ Steep Slopes _______Sand Dunes ______ Sink Holes ______

5. Soil logs – Enter on Form 2b – Use one sheet for each soil log.

6. Considerations relating to disturbed ground:

a. Type of disturbance (check appropriate categories)Filled Area ______ Excavated Area _______ Re-graded Area ______Subsurface Drains ______ Other-Specify ______

b. Pre-existing Natural Ground SurfaceElevation relative to existing ground surface ____________________________Method of identification ______________________________________________________________________

c. Suitability of disturbed ground:Unsuitable, objects subject to disintegration or change in volume ______Excessively course ______Proctor text performed ______ % Standard proctor density = _______

7. Hydraulically head test:

a. Hydraulically restrictive horizon, Depth to bottom:b. Piezometer A, Depth to bottom: _______ Depth of water level (24 hrs): _____c. Piezometer B, Depth to bottom: _______ Depth of water level (24 hrs): _____d. Witnessed by: ______________________________________ (signature) Date: _________________

8. Attachments (check items included)

Site plan: _______Key map showing location of site on U.S.G.S. Quadrangle or Other Accurate map: ______Key map showing location of site on U.S.D.A. Soil Survey map: ______Other – Specify _____________________________________________________________________________

9. I hereby certify that the information furnished on Form 2a of this application (and the attachments thereto) is true andaccurate. I am aware that falsification of data is a violation of the Water Pollution Control Act (N.J.S.A. 58:10A-1 etseq.) and is subject to penalties as prescribed in N.J.A.C. 7:14-8.

Signature of Soil Evaluator: _____________________________________________ Date: _________________Signature of Professional Engineer: ________________________________________ License #:_____________

County: _________________________________________ Municipality:_______________________________________

23 109

Michael Roth, P.E., Roth Engineering, LLC

52 Quail Run, Long Valley, NJ 07853

(973) 715-7427

24GE05262600

XX

Morris Township of Mendham

02/26/21

Page 6: Roth Engineering, LLC

N.J.A.C. 7:9A – Appendix B Forms

3 01/2010

Form 2b Soil Log and Interpretation

Lot: _________________ Block: ______________

1. Log Number: ________ Method (check one) : Profile Pit: ________ Boring: ________

2. Soil Log:Depth: (inches) _________

Top-Bottom: __________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________________

[Munsel color name and symbol; estimated textural class; estimated volume % coarse fragment, if present; structure; moist or dry consistence; mottling – abundance, size and contrast, if present]

3. Ground water observation:Seepage-indicate depth: ___________

Pit/Boring-depth flooded (y/n): ________ Depth: (inches) ______ Hours: ______

4. Soil limiting zones (check appropriate categories):

Fractured rock substratum – depth to top: ______ Massive rock substratum- depth to top: ______ Excessively coarse horizon – depth top to bottom: ______ Excessively coarse substratum – depth to top: _______ Hydraulically restrictive horizon – depth top to bottom: ______ Hydraulically restrictive substratum – depth to top: ______ Perched zone of saturation – depth top to bottom: ______ Regional zone of saturation – depth to top: ______

5. Soil Suitability Classification: ________

6. I hereby certify that the information furnished on Form 2b of this application (and the attachments thereto) is true andaccurate. I am aware that falsification of data is a violation of the Water Pollution Control Act (N.J.S.A. 58:10A-1 et seq.)and is subject to penalties as prescribed in N.J.A.C. 7:14-8.

Signature of Soil Evaluator: _________________________________________________ Date: _________________Signature of Professional Engineer: ____________________________________________ License #:_____________

County: _________________________________________ Municipality:_______________________________________

23 109

1 X

0 - 18" Topsoil18" - 48" 10 YR 4/6 Dark Yellowish Brown, Sand Loam With 5% Gravel, 0% Cobbles & 0% Stones, Angular Blocky, Moist & Loose48" - 108" 10 YR 3/4 Dark Yellowish Brown, Clay Loam With 10% Gravel, 10% Cobbles & 10% Stones, Prismatic, Moist & Firm

Mottling - None, Seepage- None, Standing Water - None, Roots - None, Ledgerock - None

24GE05262600

I

Morris Township of Mendham

None

02/26/21

Page 7: Roth Engineering, LLC

N.J.A.C. 7:9A – Appendix B Forms

3 01/2010

Form 2b Soil Log and Interpretation

Lot: _________________ Block: ______________

1. Log Number: ________ Method (check one) : Profile Pit: ________ Boring: ________

2. Soil Log:Depth: (inches) _________

Top-Bottom: __________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________________

[Munsel color name and symbol; estimated textural class; estimated volume % coarse fragment, if present; structure; moist or dry consistence; mottling – abundance, size and contrast, if present]

3. Ground water observation:Seepage-indicate depth: ___________

Pit/Boring-depth flooded (y/n): ________ Depth: (inches) ______ Hours: ______

4. Soil limiting zones (check appropriate categories):

Fractured rock substratum – depth to top: ______ Massive rock substratum- depth to top: ______ Excessively coarse horizon – depth top to bottom: ______ Excessively coarse substratum – depth to top: _______ Hydraulically restrictive horizon – depth top to bottom: ______ Hydraulically restrictive substratum – depth to top: ______ Perched zone of saturation – depth top to bottom: ______ Regional zone of saturation – depth to top: ______

5. Soil Suitability Classification: ________

6. I hereby certify that the information furnished on Form 2b of this application (and the attachments thereto) is true andaccurate. I am aware that falsification of data is a violation of the Water Pollution Control Act (N.J.S.A. 58:10A-1 et seq.)and is subject to penalties as prescribed in N.J.A.C. 7:14-8.

Signature of Soil Evaluator: _________________________________________________ Date: _________________Signature of Professional Engineer: ____________________________________________ License #:_____________

County: _________________________________________ Municipality:_______________________________________

23 109

2 X

0 - 24" Topsoil24" - 52" 10 YR 4/6 Dark Yellowish Brown, Sand Loam With 5% Gravel, 5% Cobbles & 5% Stones, Angular Blocky, Moist & Loose52" - 120" 10 YR 3/4 Dark Yellowish Brown, Clay Loam With 15% Gravel, 10% Cobbles & 10% Stones, Prismatic, Moist & FirmMottling encountered at 84" - 120", 10 YR 3/3 Dark Brown (Few, Fine & Faint)Seepage at 96"Standing Water - None, Roots - None, Ledgerock - None

Disturbed Sample Taken at 78" Soil Permeability Class Rating Test Performed, Results: K2

24GE05262600

I

84"

96"

Morris Township of Mendham

02/26/21

Page 8: Roth Engineering, LLC

N.J.A.C. 7:9A – Appendix B Forms

4 01/2010

Form 3a Soil Permeability Data

Lot: _________________ Block: ______________

Assign a number for each test and a letter for each test replicate. Show test data and calculations on Form 3d, 3c, 3d, 3f or 3g. Use one sheet for each separate test or test replicate.

1. Summary of data – Enter data for each test replicate on a separate line.0BType of Test Test (number) Replicate (letter) Depth (inches) 1BResult*

*For tube permeameter, pit-balling and piezometer tests report results in inches per hour. For soil permeability class ratinggive soil permeability class number. For percolation test report result in minutes per inch. For basin flooding test reportresult as positive if basin drains completely within 24 hours after second filing, negative otherwise.

2. Design permeability/percolation rate: Specify test number: _________Average of text replicates ________

Single replicate ________ Slowest of replicates ________

3. Identification and classification2BType of Limiting Zone Identified Test Number

4. Attachments (check items included):____ Form 3b- Tube permeameter test data; Number of sheets. _________ Form 3c- Soil Permeability Class Rating Test Data; Number of sheets ___________ Form 3d- Percolation Test Data; Number of sheets __________ Form 3e- Pit-Bailing Test Data; Number of sheets __________ Form 3f- Piezometer Test Data; Number of sheets __________ Form 3g- Basin Flooding Test Data; Number of sheets _____

6. I hereby certify that the information furnished on Form 3a of this application (and the attachments thereto) is true andaccurate. I am aware that falsification of data is a violation of the Water Pollution Control Act (N.J.S.A. 58:10A-1 et seq.)and is subject to penalties as prescribed in N.J.A.C. 7:14-8.

Signature of Soil Evaluator: _________________________________________________ Date: _________________Signature of Professional Engineer: ____________________________________________ License #:_____________

County: _________________________________________ Municipality:_______________________________________

24GE05262600

Morris Township of Mendham

23 109

Soil Permeability Class Rating

Soil Log #2 AB

78"78"

K2K2

Suitable Fill

X 2

02/26/21

Page 9: Roth Engineering, LLC
Page 10: Roth Engineering, LLC
Page 11: Roth Engineering, LLC

N.J.A.C. 7:9A – Appendix B Forms

12 01/2010

Form 4 General Design Data

Lot: _________________ Block: ______________

1. Volume of sanitary sewage, gal.: ________________ Residential: number of dwelling units: _______ Total number if bedrooms: _____________ Commercial/Institutional – indicate type of establishment and show method of calculation. If estimate isbased on water meter data, indicate source of data, frequency of readings, average daily flow, and maximum recordeddaily reading: _________________________________________________________________________________

2. Alterations or Repairsa) Reason for alteration or repair (check appropriate categories):_______ Expansion or change in use ______ Upgrade existing facilities _______ Correct malfunctioning system ______ Other (specify): __________________b) Describe nature of alteration or repairs: ________________________________________

3. System components:a) Grease trap capacity, gals: ________

Show calculation used: _______________________________________________________________________b) Septic tank capacities, gals: _____ First compartment gals: _____ Second gals. ______ Third gals: ______c) Effluent distribution

Method: _________________ Gravity flow: ________ Gravity dosing: ________ Pressure dosing: ______Dosing device: Pump: ____ Siphon_____

d) Dosing tank capacities, gals.: Total capacity: _________ Dose volume: _________ Reserve capacity: ______e) Laterals: Total length: _____ Pipe size: ______ Spacing: ____ Total Number: _______f) Connecting pipe: Size: ________ Length: _______g) Manifold: Size:_________ Length:________h) Disposal field: Type of installation: ___________________________________________________________

Design permeability (percolation rate): ___________________________________________________________Trenches: Width:________ Total length: _______ Bed Area:_________

i) Seepage pits: Design percolation rate: ________Number of pits: Total percolation area provided: _________

4. Attachments: (check items included):______ General plan of system showing location of all system components

_____ X-Sections of each system component including grease trap, septic tank, dosing tank, disposal field, seepagepits and interceptor drains

_____Pump performance curve______ Other (specify)___________________________________________________________________________

5. I hereby certify that the information furnished on Form 4 of this application (and the attachments thereto) is true andaccurate. I am aware that falsification of data is a violation of the Water Pollution Control Act (N.J.S.A. 58:10A-1 et seq.)and is subject to penalties as prescribed in N.J.A.C. 7:14-8.

Signature of Soil Evaluator: _________________________________________________ Date: _________________Signature of Professional Engineer: ____________________________________________ License #:_____________

County: _________________________________________ Municipality:_______________________________________

23 109

Morris Township of Mendham

24GE05262600

2,000 (Total For Property)1 1

(3 Bedrooms = 500) + (15 GPD x 3 Farm Employees) = 545 GPD For Existing Dwelling & Farm

X

(15 GPD x 6 Brewery Employees) + (17.5 GPD x 78 Brewery Seats) = 1,455 GPD For Proposed BrewerySEE ATTACHED CALCULATION FOR MORE INFORMATION

X

2,250 (2-compartment)

X (with ATU)X 2,000 Proposed

1,819 Req. 364 1,455423' 1.5" 3' 9 Rows

4" 26'3" 24'

Soil Replacement Fill EnclosedSuitable Fill is Proposed

28' 50' 1,400 SF

X

X

X

02/26/21

Page 12: Roth Engineering, LLC

Projected Sewage Flows for Backer Farm 

Proposed Farm Based Brewery 

Block 109, Lot 23

Township of Mendham, Morris County, New Jersey

Date: 01/11/2021

FOR SUBMITTING UNDER TREATMENT WORKS APPROVAL

Existing Conditions

Use Gallons Units GPD System

Existing single‐family dwelling (3‐bedroom unit)  500 1 500 Existing septic system adjacent to dwelling

Existing bathroom for 3 farm employees 15 3 45 Existing septic system adjacent to dwelling

Existing event greenhouse for 30 seats (farm to table use) 35 30 1050 Existing portable toilets

1595

Notes:

Proposed Conditions (Based on seats)

Use Gallons Units GPD System

Existing single‐family dwelling (3‐bedroom unit)  500 1 500 TO REMAIN ‐ Existing septic system adjacent to dwelling

Existing bathroom for 3 farm employees 15 3 45 TO REMAIN ‐ Existing septic system adjacent to dwelling

Proposed brewery employees 15 6 90 Proposed septic system

Proposed brewery seats (indoor, outdoor and greenhouse) 17.5 78 1365 Proposed septic system

2000

Proposed Conditions (Based on area and persons served)

Use Gallons Units GPD System

Existing single‐family dwelling (3‐bedroom unit)  500 1 500 TO REMAIN ‐ Existing septic system adjacent to dwelling

Existing bathroom for 3 farm employees 15 3 45 TO REMAIN ‐ Existing septic system adjacent to dwelling

Proposed brewery employees 15 6 90 Proposed septic system

Proposed brewery area (first floor indoor tasting room) 0.125 369 46 Proposed septic system

Proposed brewery area (first floor outdoor patio) 0.125 334 42 Proposed septic system

Proposed brewery area (second floor indoor tasting room) 0.125 1668 209 Proposed septic system

Proposed brewery area (second floor outdoor deck) 0.125 722 90 Proposed septic system

Proposed brewery area (outdoor greenhouse) 0.125 984 123 Proposed septic system

Maximum persons served for brewery 5 171 855 Proposed septic system

2000

Maximum usage for brewery  78 Seats OR

171 Persons Served

Notes:

1) Farm to table use is not being continued under proposed conditions. 

2) Repurposed event greenhouse to be used for the brewery guests and farm storage/planting areas.

3) Refer to architectural plans for proposed event greenhouse farm areas.

4) Refer to architectural plans for proposed brewery indoor and outdoor seating.

1) Structure previously labeled as "creamery" contains bathrooms for farm employees only.  The former use of this structure was for a creamery and was called on

previous plan for site identification purposes only.  Refer to photographs and mapping for clarification.

2) There is no sewage volume associated with the farm store since there are no sanitary facilities for that specific use.  The farm store is self‐service with no employees.

4) Refer to architectural plan for existing event greenhouse seating.

3) Event greenhouse is served by portable toilets and used for occasional events (not on regular basis) such as farm‐to‐table dinners with the food being prepared off‐site 

or by a food truck that self contains its waste and is not associated with the existing on‐site septic system.

Page 13: Roth Engineering, LLC

N.J.A.C. 7:9A – Appendix B Forms

13 01/2010

Form 5 Design of Pressure Dosing System

Lot: _________________ Block: ______________

1. Configuration of distribution network:Type of manifold: ______ End_____Central Distribution laterals: Number ______ Length, ft: ______ Spacing, ft: ______ Hole diameter, inches: ________ Hole spacing, inches: ______ Diameter of laterals, inches: _______

2. Lateral discharge rate:Design pressure head at supply end of laterals, Hp, ft: ___________ Hole discharge rate, Q, gpm: __________Number of holes per lateral, n: _________Lateral discharge rate, (Qxn) gpm: _____________________________________________

3. Manifold length, ft: _______ Manifold diameter, inches: _______

4. System discharge rate, gpm: __________________________________

5. Pump selection:Diameter of delivery pipe: ______ Length of delivery pipe: ______

__

Elevation head, He, ft: ___Total operating head, Ht (Hp + Hf + He), ft: Pump model: __________ Rated Horsepower: __________Pump discharge rate at total operation head, gpm: ________

6. Siphon Elevation:Diameter of delivery pipe: _______ Length of delivery pipe: _______ Friction loss in delivery pipe, Hf, ft: ______ Velocity head, Hv, ft: __________ Total operating head, Ht (Hp + Hf + Hv), ft: ______Elevation of lateral invert: ______ Elevation of siphon invert: ______

7. Dose Volume:Design volume of sewage, gal/day: ______

Design permeability, in/hr: ________ or Percolation rate, min/in: __________Internal volume of distribution network: _____

Dose volume: ______

8. I hereby certify that the information furnished on Form 5 of this application (and the attachments thereto) is true andaccurate. I am aware that falsification of data is a violation of the Water Pollution Control Act (N.J.S.A. 58:10A-1 et seq.)and is subject to penalties as prescribed in N.J.A.C. 7:14-8.

Signature of Soil Evaluator: _________________________________________________ Date: _________________Signature of Professional Engineer: ____________________________________________ License #:_____________

County: _________________________________________ Municipality:_______________________________________

23 109

Morris Township of Mendham

24GE05262600

X9 47 3

1/4 31.25

2.51.18

1618.9

324

170 GPD

4" 26'0.4Friction loss in delivery pipe, Hf, ft: _ ____

Elevation of dosing tank low water level: ___475.28 Elevation of lateral invert: 485._______5

10.2

1.5Goulds, Series WS1512BHF 170

1,455

364 gallons73 gallons

Suitable Fill K46-20 in/hr

13.1 use 14

02/26/21

Page 14: Roth Engineering, LLC
Page 15: Roth Engineering, LLC
Page 16: Roth Engineering, LLC

Projected Sewage Flows for Backer Farm 

Proposed Farm Based Brewery 

Block 109, Lot 23

Township of Mendham, Morris County, New Jersey

Date: 01/11/2021

FOR SUBMITTING UNDER TREATMENT WORKS APPROVAL

Existing Conditions

Use Gallons Units GPD System

Existing single‐family dwelling (3‐bedroom unit)  500 1 500 Existing septic system adjacent to dwelling

Existing bathroom for 3 farm employees 15 3 45 Existing septic system adjacent to dwelling

Existing event greenhouse for 30 seats (farm to table use) 35 30 1050 Existing portable toilets

1595

Notes:

Proposed Conditions (Based on seats)

Use Gallons Units GPD System

Existing single‐family dwelling (3‐bedroom unit)  500 1 500 TO REMAIN ‐ Existing septic system adjacent to dwelling

Existing bathroom for 3 farm employees 15 3 45 TO REMAIN ‐ Existing septic system adjacent to dwelling

Proposed brewery employees 15 6 90 Proposed septic system

Proposed brewery seats (indoor, outdoor and greenhouse) 17.5 78 1365 Proposed septic system

2000

Proposed Conditions (Based on area and persons served)

Use Gallons Units GPD System

Existing single‐family dwelling (3‐bedroom unit)  500 1 500 TO REMAIN ‐ Existing septic system adjacent to dwelling

Existing bathroom for 3 farm employees 15 3 45 TO REMAIN ‐ Existing septic system adjacent to dwelling

Proposed brewery employees 15 6 90 Proposed septic system

Proposed brewery area (first floor indoor tasting room) 0.125 369 46 Proposed septic system

Proposed brewery area (first floor outdoor patio) 0.125 334 42 Proposed septic system

Proposed brewery area (second floor indoor tasting room) 0.125 1668 209 Proposed septic system

Proposed brewery area (second floor outdoor deck) 0.125 722 90 Proposed septic system

Proposed brewery area (outdoor greenhouse) 0.125 984 123 Proposed septic system

Maximum persons served for brewery 5 171 855 Proposed septic system

2000

Maximum usage for brewery  78 Seats OR

171 Persons Served

Notes:

1) Farm to table use is not being continued under proposed conditions. 

2) Repurposed event greenhouse to be used for the brewery guests and farm storage/planting areas.

3) Refer to architectural plans for proposed event greenhouse farm areas.

4) Refer to architectural plans for proposed brewery indoor and outdoor seating.

1) Structure previously labeled as "creamery" contains bathrooms for farm employees only.  The former use of this structure was for a creamery and was called on

previous plan for site identification purposes only.  Refer to photographs and mapping for clarification.

2) There is no sewage volume associated with the farm store since there are no sanitary facilities for that specific use.  The farm store is self‐service with no employees.

4) Refer to architectural plan for existing event greenhouse seating.

3) Event greenhouse is served by portable toilets and used for occasional events (not on regular basis) such as farm‐to‐table dinners with the food being prepared off‐site 

or by a food truck that self contains its waste and is not associated with the existing on‐site septic system.

Page 17: Roth Engineering, LLC
Page 18: Roth Engineering, LLC
Page 19: Roth Engineering, LLC

Subchapter 7: General Design and Construction Requirements

4. Volume of sanitary sewage

The project does not fully conform to the above number based on the type of use proposed. The project proposes a brewery which is held to the commercial food service standard therefore we require a Treatment Works Approval (TWA). In addition, the proposed use does not have a specified design flow criterion therefore a TWA is required. The project proposes a total design flow for the property of 2,000 GPD as shown on the prior attachment to not require a General Permit (GP) or New Jersey Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NJPDES) approval.

Page 20: Roth Engineering, LLC
Page 21: Roth Engineering, LLC
Page 22: Roth Engineering, LLC

Premier Tech Confidential

▪ The design assumes that biodegradability is comparable to that of domestic sewage. Therefore, it is

considered that only human waste is going through the system (no animal waste, commercial kitchen,

or restaurant).

▪ Oil and grease content of wastewater must be lowered to a concentration inferior to 50 mg/L before

entering the system.

If the treatment process conditions should be different than the ones specified above, the

system’s design will have to be revised.

It is also important to mention that the Ecoflo Coco unit specified for this project (EC-7.3-P-G)

must never be installed in conditions where water can accumulate around it (the high

groundwater level should never reach the bottom of the unit). If water could accumulate around

the unit, concrete Ecoflo units should be installed instead, please contact us for further

information.

We remain at your disposal for any further enquiries.

Sincerely,

Martine Séguin, eng.

Application Engineering Manager

Premier Tech

Page 23: Roth Engineering, LLC

SUPPLEMENTARY CALCULATIONS FOR SEPTIC PERMIT APPLICATION

PROPOSED FARM BASED BREWERY AT BACKER FARM 32 IRONIA ROAD BLOCK 109, LOT 23 TOWNSHIP OF MENDHAM MORRIS COUNTY, NEW JERSEY

Date: February 26, 2021 Applicant: BF Partners, LLC 8 Sunset Drive Randolph, NJ 07869 Engineer:

52 Quail Run Long Valley, NJ 07853

________________________________________ Michael J. Roth, P.E. License No. 24GE05262600

Page 24: Roth Engineering, LLC

INVERTS IN OUT

BUILDING EXIT 490.0

SEPTIC TANK 485.8 485.5 ECOFLO COCO FILTER 484.2 480.3 DOSING TANK 479.9 479.7

DOSING TANK Required dose volume and tank size N.J.A.C. 7:9A-9.2(b): 423 L.F. (1.5” Laterals) x 3.14 (0.75 in.)2 144 in/ft.2 = 5.2 ft.3 26 L.F. (4” Delivery) x 3.14 (2.0 in.)2 144 in/ft.2 = 2.3 ft.3 24 L.F. (3” Manifold) x 3.14 (1.5 in.)2 144 in/ft.2 = 1.2 ft.3 Pump Displacement = 1 ft.3

__________

= 9.7 ft.3 x 7.48 gal/ ft.3 = 73 gal Minimum required dose volume = 10 V = 10 (73) = 730 Gal. Maximum dose volume = 25% Q = 0.25 x 1,455 Gal. = 364 Gal. 25% Q governs, Use Dose Vol. = 364 Gal. (Note: Based on Soil permeability rate of imported select fill in zone of treatment, 6-20 in/hr.) PER N.J.A.C. 7:9A-9.2b(1) and (3): Required reserve capacity = daily vol. of sanitary sewage = 1,455 Gal. Total required liquid capacity of tank=Dose vol. + Reserve capacity = 364 Gal + 1,455 Gal = 1,819 Gal Use 2,000 Gal. Dosing Tank

Page 25: Roth Engineering, LLC

LATERAL PIPE SIZE AND HOLE SPACING PER N.J.A.C. 7:9A- 10.3(d) 2v and 9.7(a)2: Use 1/4" Holes @ 36" Spacing Figure 14, Appendix A, under 1/4" holes, lateral length = 47 feet and hole spacing = 3 ft. Use 1-1/2" PVC laterals PER N.J.A.C. 7:9A- 9.7 (a)4: Hole Discharge Rate = 1.18 GPM Lateral Discharge Rate = Hole Discharge Rate x # holes/lateral = 1.18 x 16 = 18.9 GPM Figure 15, Appendix A, under manifold length = 24' and 9 laterals in end manifold, Laterals and Flow per Lateral = 18.9 GPM, Use 3" Manifold (PVC) System Discharge Rate = Lateral Discharge Rate x # Laterals = 18.9 GPM x 9 Laterals = 170 GPM PUMP DESIGN Friction Loss in Schedule 40 Plastic Pipe (Figure 16, Appendix A), Using 4" Delivery Pipe = 40 ft. (between pump tank and field), friction loss = 1.5 ft/100 ft or 0.4 ft. in 26 ft. Total operating head ht = Hf + He + Hp Hf = Friction Head = 0.4 ft (above) He = Elevation Head = 485.5 (invert of distribution laterals) – 475.28 (dosing tank low water elevation) = 10.2 ft. Hp=2.5 Ht = 0.4 ft. + 10.2 ft.+ 2.5 ft.= 13.1 ft. use 14 ft. PER N.J.A.C. 7:9A- 9.7(a)7iii: A pump capable of delivering 170 GPM against 14 ft. of head is required. Use Goulds Submersible Effluent Pump Model 3887, Series WS1512BHF, 1 ½ HP, 230V single phase (or approved equal).

Page 26: Roth Engineering, LLC

PUMP ON AND OFF ELEVATION PUMP TANK BOTTOM INVERT = 474.20 INTAKE = 4” CONCRETE PEDESTAL + 3" = 474.78 PUMP OFF = +6" = 475.28 PUMP ON (SEE BELOW) = 476.15 PUMP ON = PUMP OFF + D D = (vcd + vcp + vpd) (1 ft.3) (12 in/ft.) A Where vcd = Dose vol. (Gal.) vcp = Backflow (Gal.), vpd = Displacement of Pump (Gal.), A = Area of Pump Tank d = (364 Gal + 0.6 Gal + 7.48 Gal) (1 ft.3/7.48 Gal) (12 in/ft) 57.7 sf d = 49.7 ft.3 (12 in/ft) = 10.4 inches 57.7 Ft.2 Pump On = 475.28 + 10.4 in. = 476.15 High Level Alarm = + 4" = 476.48 Daily Sewage Volume (Reserve Capacity) in Dosing Tank, 479.9 (Invert Elevation) – 476.48 (High Level Alarm) = 3.4 Reserve Capacity = 3.4 ft x 57.7 sf x (7.48 gal/cf) = 1,467 gal > 1,455 gal (Daily Sewage Volume)

Page 27: Roth Engineering, LLC

FEATURES

Impeller: Cast iron, enclosed, non-clog, dynamically balanced with pump out vanes for mechanical seal protection.

Casing: Cast iron flanged volute type for maximum efficiency. Designed for easy installation on A10-20 slide rail or base elbow rail systems.

Mechanical Seal: SILICON CARBIDE VS. SILICON CARBIDE sealing faces for superior abrasive resistance, stainless steel metal parts, BUNA-N elastomers.

Shaft: Corrosion-resistant, 300 series stainless steel. Threaded design. Locknut on all models to guard against component damage on accidental reverse rotation.

Fasteners: 300 series stainless steel.

Capable of running dry without damage to components.

Designed for continuous operation when fully submerged.

EXTENDED WARRANTY AVAILABLE FOR RESIDENTIAL APPLICATIONS.

WS_BHF Series Model 3887BHFSUBMERSIBLE SEWAGE PUMP

TECHNICAL BROCHUREB3887BHF

Page 28: Roth Engineering, LLC

PAGE 2

WastewaterGoulds Water Technology

0 20 40 60 80 240 U.S. GPM0

10

20

30

40

FEET

TOTA

L D

YN

AM

IC H

EA

D

0

5

10

15

METERS

FLOW RATE

SERIES: WS_BHFDISCHARGE: 2”SOLIDS: 2"RPM: 3500

100 120 140

50

0 3010 20 m3/h50

100

60

70

80

90

20

25

30

160 180 200 220

40

WS20BHF

WS15BHF

WS10BHF

WS07BHFWS05BHFWS03BHF

5 FT

10 GPM

APPLICATIONS

Specifically designed for the following uses:

• Homes • Water transfer

• Sewage systems • Light industrial

• Dewatering/Effluent • Commercial applicationsAnywhere waste or drainage must be disposed of quickly, quietly and efficiently.

SPECIFICATIONS

Pump• Solids handling capabilities: 2" maximum

• Capacities: up to 220 GPM

• Total heads: up to 81 feet TDH

• Discharge size: 2" NPT threaded companion flange as standard. 3" option available but must be ordered separately. (Order no. A1-3)

• Temperature: 104°F (40°C) continuous 140°F (60°C) intermittent.

MOTORS

• Fully submerged in high grade turbine oil for lubrica-tion and efficient heat transfer. All ratings are within the working limits of the motor.

Class B insulation on 1⁄3-11⁄2 HP models.Class F insulation on 2 HP models.

Single phase (60 Hz):

• Capacitor start motors for maximum starting torque.

• Built-in overload with automatic reset.

• SJTOW or STOW severe duty oil and water resistant power cords.

• 1⁄3 – 1 HP models have NEMA three prong ground-ing plugs.

• 1½ HP and larger units have bare lead cord ends.

Three phase (60 Hz):

• Class 10 overload protection must be provided in separately ordered starter unit.

• STOW power cords all have bare lead cord ends.

• Bearings: Upper and lower heavy duty ball bearing construction.

• Designed for Continuous Operation: Pump ratings are within the motor manufacturer's recommended working limits, can be operated continuously without damage when fully submerged.

• Power Cable: Severe duty rated, oil and water resistant. Epoxy seal on motor end provides secondary moisture barrier in case of outer jacket damage and to prevent oil wicking. Standard cord is 20'. Optional lengths are available.

• Motor Cover O-ring: Assures positive sealing against contaminants and oil leakage.

AGENCY LISTINGS

C US

®

Tested to UL 778 and CSA 22.2 108 StandardsBy Canadian Standards AssociationFile #LR38549

miker
Line
miker
Line
Page 29: Roth Engineering, LLC

PAGE 3

WastewaterGoulds Water Technology

Order Impeller Max. Locked KVA Full Load Resistance Number HP Phase Volts RPM Dia. (In.) Amps Rotor Code Motor Amps Eff. % Start Line-Line

WS0311BHF 0.33 1 115 12.4 46.0 M 54 7.5 1.0 WS0318BHF 0.33 1 208 2.94 6.8 31.0 K 68 9.7 2.4 WS0312BHF 0.33 1 230 6.2 34.5 M 53 9.6 4.0 WS0511BHF 0.5 1 115 14.5 46.0 M 54 7.5 1.0 WS0518BHF 0.5 1 208 8.4 31.0 K 68 9.7 2.4 WS0512BHF 0.5 1 230 7.6 34.5 M 53 9.6 4.0 WS0538BHF 0.5 3 200 3.19 4.9 22.6 R 68 – 3.8 WS0532BHF 0.5 3 230 3.6 18.8 R 70 – 5.8 WS0534BHF 0.5 3 460 1.8 9.4 R 70 – 23.2 WS0537BHF 0.5 3 575 1.5 7.5 R 62 – 35.3 WS0718BHF 0.75 1 208 11.0 31.0 K 68 9.7 2.4 WS0712BHF 0.75 1 230 10.0 27.5 J 65 12.2 2.7 WS0738BHF 0.75 3 200 3.44 6.2 20.6 L 64 – 5.7 WS0732BHF 0.75 3 230 5.4 15.7 K 68 – 8.6 WS0734BHF 0.75 3 460 2.7 7.9 K 68 – 34.2 WS0737BHF 0.75 3 575 3500 2.2 9.9 L 78 – 26.5 WS1018BHF 1 1 208 14.5 59.0 K 68 9.3 1.1 WS1012BHF 1 1 230 13.0 36.2 J 69 10.3 2.1 WS1038BHF 1 3 200 3.75 8.6 27.6 M 77 – 2.7 WS1032BHF 1 3 230 7.5 24.1 L 79 – 4.1 WS1034BHF 1 3 460 3.8 12.1 L 79 – 16.2 WS1037BHF 1 3 575 3.1 9.9 L 78 – 26.5 WS1512BHF 1.5 1 230 18.0 52.0 J 67 2.76 0.53 WS1538BHF 1.5 3 200 10.0 42.4 K 78 – 1.7 WS1532BHF 1.5 3 230 4.00 9.6 42.4 K 78 – 1.7 WS1534BHF 1.5 3 460 4.8 21.2 K 78 – 6.6 WS1537BHF 1.5 3 575 3.9 16.3 L 78 – 10.5 WS2012BHF 2 1 230 18.0 49.6 F 78 3.2 1.1 WS2038BHF 2 3 200 12.0 42.4 K 78 – 1.7 WS2032BHF 2 3 230 4.44 11.6 42.4 K 78 – 1.7 WS2034BHF 2 3 460 5.8 21.2 K 78 – 6.6 WS2037BHF 2 3 575 4.7 16.3 L 78 – 10.5

MOTOR AND MODEL INFORMATION

DIMENSIONS(All dimensions are in inches. Do not use for construction purposes.)

61⁄4"

121⁄2"

81⁄4"

KICK-BACK

19"

ROTATION

61⁄8" 71⁄8"

Discharge Flange

Discharge Flange:

① 2" NPT standard② 3" NPT optional (order an A1-3)① ②

Page 30: Roth Engineering, LLC

* For repair parts, reference repair parts book.

7

5

8

1

6

34

2

PERFORMANCE RATINGS (gallons per minute) COMPONENTS (for reference only)

Item No. Description 1 Impeller 2 Casing 3 Mechanical Seal 4 Motor Shaft 5 Motor 6 Ball Bearings 7 Power Cable 8 Casing O-Ring

Goulds is a registered trademark of Goulds Pumps, Inc. and is used under license.© 2012 Xylem Inc. B3887BHF R1 April 2012

Xylem, Inc.2881 East Bayard Street Ext., Suite ASeneca Falls, NY 13148Phone: (866) 325-4210 Fax: (888) 322-5877www.xyleminc.com/brands/gouldswatertechnology

Order No.

WS03-BHF

WS05-BHF

WS07-BHF

WS10-BHF

WS15-BHF

WS20-BHF

Tota

l Hea

d F

eet

of

Wat

er

HP 1⁄3 1⁄2 3⁄4 1 11⁄2 2

RPM 3500 3500 3500 3500 3500 3500

10 86 110 140 – – –

15 48 88 120 158 – –

20 – 62 98 139 186 217

25 – 32 74 120 170 204

30 – – 49 101 150 190

35 – – 21 82 130 175

40 – – – 60 110 159

45 – – – 38 88 140

50 – – – – 67 120

55 – – – – 47 100

60 – – – – 29 80

65 – – – – – 62

70 – – – – – 43

75 – – – – – 23

Page 31: Roth Engineering, LLC
Page 32: Roth Engineering, LLC