ROSSLYN - bergdemo.com
Transcript of ROSSLYN - bergdemo.com
7 • DEMOLITION • JULY/AUG 2005
ROSSLYN, VA
No matter what region of the
country you hail from, and regardless
if you are a large or small concern,
there are certain truisms to any
demolition business. There are never
enough dump trucks available when
you need them. You can never find
enough talented operators. No city
has more than one crane operator
capable of balling a building and he
is invariably 80 years old, grouchy
and has made plans to go hunting
every day you need him, and finally, your company is always presented with its greatest opportunities when
you are crushed with other work.
No matter what region of the country you hail from, and regardless if you are a large or small
concern, there are certain truisms to any demolition business. There are never enough dump trucks
available when you need them. You can never find enough talented operators. No city has more than one
crane operator capable of balling a building and he is invariably 80 years old, grouchy and has made plans
to go hunting every day you need him, and finally, your company is always presented with its greatest
opportunities when you are crushed with other work.
Facelift forRosslyn
Berg Style
8 • DEMOLITION • JULY/AUG 2005
Clark Construction, exceeding their profit
margin projections, and surviving a
Virginia Occupational Safety and Health
Administration inspection with absolutely no
infractions.
Berg developed two control crucial
documents. First came a schedule denoting a
start and completion point for every task on
the project. The second was a budget that
tracked all direct costs on a daily basis. The
importance of these seemingly innocuous
spreadsheets cannot be overstated. They kept
the goals of a multifaceted project consistent
and in focus. Berg used them to efficiently
review the project on a daily basis. They were
able to right any deviations from schedule or
budget immediately.
The gut for this project would have to
be the most thorough The Berg Group had
ever performed in order to facilitate efficient
and timely balling of the structures. They
were also required under the
contract to use the 11,000 cubic
yards of the concrete from the
demolished structures to build
a bench system to be utilized
for pile driving. Anything less
than a pure concrete product
left behind would damage their
reputation with their new
This past December it was 15 degrees outside but inside,
The Berg Group’s business was on fire. They were packed with
work and scrambling to get it done. Then the phone rang. Clark
Construction, one of the nation’s premier general contractors, was
on the line soliciting bids on what is was become one of the largest
projects the Baltimore-based Berg Group would ever tackled and
with a time frame for completion so aggressive that Berg’s man-
agement team unanimously felt was impossible. So Berg did what
anybody in the demolition
business would do. They took
the job!
The Berg Group had
five months and one week to
gut out, ball down, load out,
process and construct a bench
for three high-rise towers
totaling 400,000 square feet
and a 125 foot pedestrian
bridge transversing a six lane
artery leading into the
nation’s capitol. There could
be no poor decisions or wasted days to accomplish this feat.
Berg had come to the conclusion as an organization that
their success or failure in the field was a product of their plan-
ning and preparedness long before they physically set foot on a
project site. Their preplanning for this project was integral to
meeting and, ultimately, beating the schedule demanded by
9 • DEMOLITION • JULY/AUG 2005
client. To effectuate a gut to these strict standards
within the timeframe prescribed would necessitate
having adequate and capable staff to work on five
floors simultaneously and to complete each floor in
no more than four days.
The five independent crews gutting the
structures had to be managed and supported to
ensure no team exceeded their four-day window.
One team exceeding their time frame would set off
a chain reaction of additional crane costs or under-
utilized assets in an attempt to get the teams back
in sync.
First, The Berg Group assigned one of their
division vice presidents to be a permanent fixture
on site, personally overseeing every aspect of the
project. Their senior operational management con-
tingent would join him each morning at the site to
review adherence to their budget and schedule.
They would also scrutinize their short-term
goals and brainstorm to guarantee optimum effi-
ciency. Their heavy demolition contingent was
fully engaged in the planning and administration of
the gutting facet of the project adding input and
direction to help ensure a superior final product.
Secondly, Berg used a combination of their
own staff, augmented with a crack team of skid-
steer operators from a small interior demolition
company.
Another integral element to success was a
field designed chute system to get demolition
waste and tin to the ground in the most expeditious
fashion possible. This design was aggressive and
pushed the envelope of acceptable chute systems.
The chute design allowed for maximum unfettered
egress. The system ultimately met the scrutiny of
our client as well as the Virginia Occupational
Safety and Health Administration.
The Berg Group’s gutting team was also
charged with removing the façade from the struc-
tures. Left to come down with the buildings, this
10 • DEMOLITION • JULY/AUG 2005
debris had the potential to sail into the heavy flow of nearby traf-
fic or into neighboring structures. The final piece of the puzzle
for the gutting contingent was the removal of a 125-foot pedestri-
an bridge over one of the busiest arteries in the nation.
Before they started Berg had to produce a lane closure and
ultimate road closure plan to remove this structure with no periph-
eral damage or injuries. Actual removal was
broken down into three elements; the exposure
of the steel skeletal system that supported
the physical bridge. A Brokk 250 Robotic
Demolition tool and a John Deere 595D outfit-
ted with a 3,000 pound hammer were utilized
for this task. There were three beams weighing
26,000 pounds each supporting the bridge
deck.
With the assistance of a 150-ton crane
the company closed the road, cut the beams at
the support pillars and removed them at night.
They prepared the beams and sold them for
salvage. Finally, Berg employed their John
Deere in removing the concrete pillars that
supported the bridge.
Most notable was the result of a sur-
prise inspection by Virginia Occupational
11 • DEMOLITION • JULY/AUG 2005
upcoming 11th Annual Safety Summit in
October ‘05 in Baltimore to focus on proper
preparation and appropriate actions when
faced with a surprise OSHA inspection.
Immediately upon completion of
gutting activities on the first building,
balling operations commenced with the
company’s 85-ton P&H crane. It took
approximately a week to fell the seven-
story structure that sat about ten feet
from its closest neighbor and eight feet
from the roadway. Seventy feet of the
structure fell at once in implosion-like
unison, a pure masterpiece in the demoli-
tion genre. Simultaneously, Berg initiated
on the ground demolition and separation
activities with three PC 300’s and a PC
400 equipped with buckets, grapples,
shears, and pulverizers.
The PC 300 started to tear down
a concrete three-story parking garage.
The 400 began bailing back the debris on
the peripheral of the balling operation.
The entire seven-story structure and
parking garage, totaling 116,000 square
feet, was processed and loaded out in
three weeks.
Safety and Health Administration. During the inspec-
tion, Berg’s workforce was fully engaged in torching out
the penthouses, gutting multiple floors of one 12-story
structure, balling a second 12-story structure, loading
out a contingent of ten tri-axles and three demolition
trailers.
There were no VOSHA infractions. This was
phenomenal. The Berg Group’s experience with this
inspection and subsequent discussions with the Health
and Safety Committee of the National Demolition
Association has prompted a one-day seminar at the
12 • DEMOLITION • JULY/AUG 2005
This process was repeated on the two remaining 12-story
structures. The phenomenal production of the heavy demolition
contingent definitely fueled the project. They were constantly
nipping at the heels of the gutting operations, adding a sense of
urgency to the process.
The balling of one of the 12-story structures presented a
unique challenge as it fronted a six-lane highway. The building
stood a mere eight feet from traffic. Anything less than a flawless
textbook balling sequence would have meant disaster.
The building was felled to its core with not a speck of dust
leaving the footprint of the structure. The Berg Group’s clients
and the owners of the project were present to witness the final
crescendo and were “blown away” with the precision and pre-
dictability of the event.
The final eight weeks of the project were focused on the
processing of the two 12-story structures, underground parking
garage and interior foundation walls. All the material was con-
crete processed. All of the rebar was loaded out for salvage.
Much of the concrete was incorporated into the bench design,
with the remainder shipped out as fill material to a nearby project.
The Rosslyn project was completed a full month ahead of
schedule. The Berg Group’s new client has invited them to bid on
three subsequent projects. The management of The Berg Group
credits all of their employees involved in making the Waterview,
VA project such a grand success.
PROJECT DATASHEET
EQUIPMENT UTILIZED:
BROKK 250 RoboticDemolition Tool
8 – BOBCAT S-160Skidsteer Loaders
with Grapple / HammerAttachments
JOHN DEERE 595Dwith 3,000 Pound Hammer
Attachment
KOMATSU PC 220
3 – KOMATSU PC 300’S
KOMATSU PC 400
P & H 85 TON CRANE
CONSTRUCTION /DEMOLITION DEBRISTONNAGE HAULED:
2,800 TONS
CONCRETE LOADSHAULED OFFSITE:
45,000 TONS
REBAR PROCESSED& HAULED OFFSITE:
1,000 TONS
PLATE & STRUCTURALHAULED OFFSITE:
23 TONS
TIN HAULED OFFSITE:
640 TONS
DEMOLITION