Robert Neches & Pedro Szekely, USC ISI, © 2000 CAMERA, Logistics Working Group CAMERA - MICANT...

7
Robert Neches & Pedro Szekely, USC ISI, © 2000 CAMERA, http://www.isi.edu/camera/ Logistics Working Logistics Working Group Group CAMERA - MICANT Coordination CAMERA - MICANT Coordination Robert Neches, Pedro Robert Neches, Pedro Szekely Szekely University of Southern California University of Southern California Information Sciences Institute Information Sciences Institute Marina del Rey, California Marina del Rey, California Gabor Karsai, Benoit Gabor Karsai, Benoit Dawant Dawant Vanderbilt University Vanderbilt University Russ Currer Russ Currer Idea Services Idea Services

Transcript of Robert Neches & Pedro Szekely, USC ISI, © 2000 CAMERA, Logistics Working Group CAMERA - MICANT...

Page 1: Robert Neches & Pedro Szekely, USC ISI, © 2000 CAMERA,  Logistics Working Group CAMERA - MICANT Coordination Robert Neches, Pedro.

Robert Neches & Pedro Szekely, USC ISI, © 2000 CAMERA, http://www.isi.edu/camera/

Logistics Working GroupLogistics Working Group

CAMERA - MICANT CoordinationCAMERA - MICANT Coordination

Robert Neches, Pedro SzekelyRobert Neches, Pedro SzekelyUniversity of Southern CaliforniaUniversity of Southern California

Information Sciences InstituteInformation Sciences InstituteMarina del Rey, CaliforniaMarina del Rey, California

Gabor Karsai, Benoit Dawant Gabor Karsai, Benoit Dawant Vanderbilt UniversityVanderbilt University

Russ CurrerRuss CurrerIdea ServicesIdea Services

Page 2: Robert Neches & Pedro Szekely, USC ISI, © 2000 CAMERA,  Logistics Working Group CAMERA - MICANT Coordination Robert Neches, Pedro.

Robert Neches & Pedro Szekely, USC ISI, © 2000 CAMERA, http://www.isi.edu/camera/

What Makes True Logistics What Makes True Logistics a Good Negotiation Testbed?a Good Negotiation Testbed?

Dynamic, continuous process:Simultaneous long-range, short range and execution concerns– Six-month to year goals for Marine Expeditionary Units

(MEUs): you, your aircraft, data, systems and 2k friends– Build/maintain weekly and daily schedules– Repair schedules on five minutes notice

Strong good-enough / soon-enough pressures (same reasons)

Contrast to traditional optimization– Cannot elicit full evaluation function in advance– Frequent need to change constraints to handle problem

VERY high military payoffs: Money, Lives

Page 3: Robert Neches & Pedro Szekely, USC ISI, © 2000 CAMERA,  Logistics Working Group CAMERA - MICANT Coordination Robert Neches, Pedro.

Robert Neches & Pedro Szekely, USC ISI, © 2000 CAMERA, http://www.isi.edu/camera/

Key Ideas of a Joint DemonstrationKey Ideas of a Joint Demonstration

First demonstration of feedback loops First demonstration of feedback loops in a large-scale negotiation processin a large-scale negotiation process

First demonstration of feedback loops First demonstration of feedback loops in a large-scale negotiation processin a large-scale negotiation process

Commander’sIntent

Commander’sIntent

Mission-SensitivePlanning

Mission-SensitivePlanning

Page 4: Robert Neches & Pedro Szekely, USC ISI, © 2000 CAMERA,  Logistics Working Group CAMERA - MICANT Coordination Robert Neches, Pedro.

Robert Neches & Pedro Szekely, USC ISI, © 2000 CAMERA, http://www.isi.edu/camera/

CAMERA / MICANTS Integration PlanCAMERA / MICANTS Integration Plan

1.Scheduling/planning of short-term, tactical, corrective maintenance actions in light of the flight schedule

SNAP supplies daily flight schedule to MAPLANT which in turn generates a daily maintenance plan

2. Scheduling/planning of long-term, strategic, scheduled maintenance actions w.r.t. long-term flight schedule

SNAP supplies n-week flight schedule to MAPLANT which uses that to generate a long term maintenance plan

3. Scheduling flight operations based on plane availability

MAPLANT provides a "best effort" estimates for the number of available aircrafts over time. SNAP creates a schedule based on these estimated generation rates.

4. Scheduling flight operations based on plane availability and capabilities

MAPLANT provides a "best effort“ estimates for the number aircrafts, their capabilities, other attributes, and negotiable and non-negotiable constraints associated with them. SNAP creates a schedule based on this.

5. Negotiation between MAPLANT and SNAP

The two systems interact using a well-defined messaging protocol to facilitate negotiation between the flight schedule and maintenance schedule. The objective is to explore trade-offs between the two aspects to achieve global optimization w.r.t. some metric (e.g., generation rate, CRP, etc.)

Page 5: Robert Neches & Pedro Szekely, USC ISI, © 2000 CAMERA,  Logistics Working Group CAMERA - MICANT Coordination Robert Neches, Pedro.

Robert Neches & Pedro Szekely, USC ISI, © 2000 CAMERA, http://www.isi.edu/camera/

Insights and New DirectionsInsights and New Directions

Services rendered by negotiation

– Control systems

– Decision support

Dimensions of scaling to explore

– Speed: tie to replanning during missions

– Size: coordinating much larger organizations

– Planning horizon: very long-range planning

Page 6: Robert Neches & Pedro Szekely, USC ISI, © 2000 CAMERA,  Logistics Working Group CAMERA - MICANT Coordination Robert Neches, Pedro.

Robert Neches & Pedro Szekely, USC ISI, © 2000 CAMERA, http://www.isi.edu/camera/

Rough Demo ScenarioRough Demo Scenario

OPSMaintenance

Guidance

MAPLANT SNAP

First Cut Plan

Refined Ops Plan

Approx. Maintenance Plan (A/C status)

Refined Maintenance Plan

Page 7: Robert Neches & Pedro Szekely, USC ISI, © 2000 CAMERA,  Logistics Working Group CAMERA - MICANT Coordination Robert Neches, Pedro.

Robert Neches & Pedro Szekely, USC ISI, © 2000 CAMERA, http://www.isi.edu/camera/

Tasks and TimelineTasks and Timeline

CAMERA: implement SNAP initial assessment milestones (esp. flight hour guidance)

MICANT: scope initial MAPLANT coverage of maintenance issues(portions of T&R manual, Mission Essential Systems List) in order to determine scenario specifics

Week of Dec 18: VTC to define interfaces (probably XML DTDs), flesh out schedule based on scenario specifics

Jan: coordination meeting

Feb: Status review: GO vs. DEFER decision on scheduling

If decision is GO, then:– Issue invitations to major constituents for high-profile demo in April

– Schedule March integration and first rehearsal meeting

– April: provide major demonstration at MCAS Yuma and/or other venues