Rob Roebeling

12
Rob Roebeling CloudNET meeting 18 – 19 October 2004, Delft METEOSAT-8 OBSERVATIONS AND DERIVED CLOUD MICROPHYSICAL PROPERTIES

description

Rob Roebeling. CloudNET meeting 18 – 19 October 2004, Delft METEOSAT-8 OBSERVATIONS AND DERIVED CLOUD MICROPHYSICAL PROPERTIES. Climate Monitoring Satellite Application Facility (CMSAF) Funding: European Meteorological Satellite Organization (EUMETSAT) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Rob Roebeling

Page 1: Rob Roebeling

Rob Roebeling

CloudNET meeting18 – 19 October 2004, Delft

METEOSAT-8 OBSERVATIONS AND DERIVED CLOUD MICROPHYSICAL PROPERTIES

Page 2: Rob Roebeling

Climate Monitoring Satellite Application Facility (CMSAF)

Funding: European Meteorological Satellite Organization (EUMETSAT)

Objective: To generate and archive high quality data products frommeteorological satellites (MSG and AVHRR/METOP) on

a continuous basis, which are relevant for climate research.

DWD (coordinator), FMI, KNMI, RMIB, SMHI and Meteo Swiss

KNMI involvement:• To develop method to retrieve Cloud Physical Products from NOAA-

AVHRR (and METOP) and MSG.• To validate the Cloud Physical Products with in-situ data of dedicate

cloud measurement campaigns

Page 3: Rob Roebeling

MSG channels and Currently Derived Physical Products.

Cloud Thermodynamic PhaseCloud Liquid Water PathCloud Optical Thickness

Effective RadiusOptical depth

Cloud Top TemperatureDroplet density

Channel 1 (VIS 0.6)

Channel 2 (VIS 0.8)

Channel 3 (NIR 1.6)

Channel 4 (IR 3.9)

Channel 5 (WV 6.2)

Channel 6 (WV 7.3)

Channel 7 (IR 8.7)

Channel 8 (IR 9.7)

Channel 9 (IR 10.8) (Tb)

Channel 10 (IR 12)

Channel 11 (IR 13.4)

Channel 12 (HRV)

Page 4: Rob Roebeling

Radiative Transfer Modelling

R(sur)

Above the cloud

Below the cloud

ac

bc

Scattering and absorption• Phase• Optical Thickness • Geometric

Thickness• Droplet Density• Effective Radius

Reflectance,

Page 5: Rob Roebeling

MSG images for Channels 1, 3

Channel 1: 0.6 microns

Channel 3: 1.6 microns

Page 6: Rob Roebeling

Calibration and Cloud-phase

Water Clouds

Land

Sea

Ice Clouds

Scatterplot 1.6 vs. 0.6 micron channels

Scatterplot 1.6 micron channel, NOAA vs. MSG

Page 7: Rob Roebeling

Cloud Optical Depth

Meteosat 8, 19 April 2004 Cloud Liquid Water Path

Page 8: Rob Roebeling

Example for Cabauw (Channel 1 & 3)

NOAA

Page 9: Rob Roebeling

Example for Cabauw (Channel 9, CTT & Phase)

NOAA

Page 10: Rob Roebeling

Example for Cabauw (Optical thickness, LWP)

Page 11: Rob Roebeling

Example for Cabauw: (Reff, Cloud Thickness (H) & n)

Reff (H) + (H)

H + n (cst)

H

Page 12: Rob Roebeling

Conclusions Meteosat-8 and NOAA reflectance at 0.6 micron are

similar.

Meteosat-8 and NOAA reflectance at 1.6 micron have a ratio of 1.3

All 12 channels will be included in the CloudNet data-base for the three sites.

Products to be include in the CloudNet data-base Cloud Thermodynamic Phase, Cloud Liquid Water Path, Cloud Optical Thickness, Effective Radius,

Cloud Top Temperature, Droplet density