Roadway condition survey & Traffic Volume Study

40
WELCOME TO THE PRESENTATION ON ROADWAY CONDITION SURVEY COURSE TITTLE : CE 452 COURSE NAME : Transportation Engineering Sessional -2 Course teacher : Mr. Minhaj & Ms. Nuzhat Department of Civil Engineering Ahsanullah university of science & technology 1

Transcript of Roadway condition survey & Traffic Volume Study

Page 1: Roadway condition survey & Traffic Volume Study

1

WELCOME TO THE PRESENTATION ON

ROADWAY CONDITION SURVEY

COURSE TITTLE : CE 452COURSE NAME : Transportation Engineering Sessional -2

Course teacher : Mr. Minhaj & Ms. Nuzhat

Department of Civil EngineeringAhsanullah university of science & technology

Page 2: Roadway condition survey & Traffic Volume Study

2

Presented by group 1Amit Chandra Barman Jyotiram Mallick Shibu

Mohammed SayemMuktarul KabirRafid NewazRifat Ahmed

Sourav TalukderTasneef Ahmed

11.01.03.12511.01.03.10411.01.03.10211.01.03.12311.01.03.12011.01.03.07111.01.03.12411.01.03.098

Page 3: Roadway condition survey & Traffic Volume Study

3

• Introduction,• Objectives of Roadway Condition Survey,• Methods can be used,• Study Site,• Data Collection,• Data Analysis,• Recommendations,

Presentation Outline :

Page 4: Roadway condition survey & Traffic Volume Study

4

Road way Condition Survey:

Roadway condition is an important parameter in selecting things for improving vehicular

movement in a road or highway. Sometimes roadside use pattern in our country affects the

traffic stream and the smoothness of their passing in the road

Page 5: Roadway condition survey & Traffic Volume Study

5

Objectives of road way condition survey:

1. Observe Geometric Condition of Roadway

2.Observe Surface Condition of Roadway

3.Observe Operating Condition of Roadway

Page 6: Roadway condition survey & Traffic Volume Study

6

Methods of roadway condition survey :

Pavement Condition Survey

Manual Method

Walking Survey

Windshield Survey

Walking + Windshield

Survey

Automatic Method

Page 7: Roadway condition survey & Traffic Volume Study

7

Manual Method

Fig: Walking Fig: Windshield

Page 8: Roadway condition survey & Traffic Volume Study

8

Manual Method

Fig: Walking+Windshield

Page 9: Roadway condition survey & Traffic Volume Study

9

Automatic Method

Page 10: Roadway condition survey & Traffic Volume Study

10

Study site :

Panthapath Road Segment between Russell Square and Green road Panthapath Intersection

Page 11: Roadway condition survey & Traffic Volume Study

11

Data Collection :• Location: Panthapath to Russel square

direction• Observation : One directional• Date: 16th January , 2014• Time: 9.00 am to 9.30 am• Duration: 25 min• Weather: Hot, humid• Method: Manual Method • Equipment: Data sheet, Tape, Camera.• Number of Surveyor : 8

Page 12: Roadway condition survey & Traffic Volume Study

12

Geometric property of road:

Page 13: Roadway condition survey & Traffic Volume Study

13

Geometric property of survey road:

From Russel Squere to PanthaPath : (Right Side)

Page 14: Roadway condition survey & Traffic Volume Study

14

GEOMETRIC PROPERTY OF SURVEY ROAD:From Russel Squere to PanthaPath : (Left Side)

Page 15: Roadway condition survey & Traffic Volume Study

15

A Sketch of the road :

Page 16: Roadway condition survey & Traffic Volume Study

16

Side road: A minor or subsidiary road, especially one joining or diverging

from a main road. It distributes trips between the main road

and local area.

Page 17: Roadway condition survey & Traffic Volume Study

17

Effects of side road on roadway condition:

Positive effects:1.Connecting residential areas with main road.

2.Making easy and movable access for the traffic of their residents and visitors.

Page 18: Roadway condition survey & Traffic Volume Study

18

Negative effects:

1.Increased traffic at the intersection of side road and main road.

2.Irregular and unplanned design, maintenance causing congestion and accidents

Page 19: Roadway condition survey & Traffic Volume Study

19

LOCATION OF SIDE ROADS :

From Russel Squere to PanthaPath :Length (m) Width (m) Side (Left/Right)

265 3.2 Right

330 4.8 Right

440 3.9 Right

646 3.3 Right

840 6.3 Right

846 5.8 Right

944 6 Right

100 4.32 Left

400 4.9 Left

480 5.9 Left

486 5 Left

500 4 Left

575 4.2 Left

590 6 Left

770 2 Left

Page 20: Roadway condition survey & Traffic Volume Study

20Fig: Typical side roads found on the survey zone.

Page 21: Roadway condition survey & Traffic Volume Study

21

SURFACE DISTRESS

Surface distress is "Any indication of poor or unfavorable pavement performance or signs of impending failure; any unsatisfactory performance of a pavement short of failure"

Classification of Distress1. Fracture ( in the form of cracking)

2. Distortion(i.e. rutting, corrugation and shoving)

3. Disintegration(i.e. form of stripping, raveling or spalling)

Page 22: Roadway condition survey & Traffic Volume Study

22Fig: Typical surface distress found on the survey

zone.

1.Ravelling

2.Rutting

Page 23: Roadway condition survey & Traffic Volume Study

23

1.Rutting

2.Shoving

Page 24: Roadway condition survey & Traffic Volume Study

24Fig: Typical surface distress found on the survey zone.

1.CORRUGATION

2.PATCHING

Page 25: Roadway condition survey & Traffic Volume Study

25

Drainage Point :

Number of drainage point:From Russels Square – Panthapath (right)=54* From Russels Square – Panthapath (left)=48*

Page 26: Roadway condition survey & Traffic Volume Study

26

Drainage Point :

Fig: Standard size of an inlet(courtesy by Swedish Ministry of Transportation).

Page 27: Roadway condition survey & Traffic Volume Study

27

Importance of drainage :

1.To prevent flooding of the road and ponding on the road surface

2.To protect the bearing capacity of the pavement and the subgrade material

3.To avoid the erosion of the side slope.

Page 28: Roadway condition survey & Traffic Volume Study

28

Drainage Point :

Fig: Irregularities maintained in case of drainage point.

Page 29: Roadway condition survey & Traffic Volume Study

29

Street Lighting• Street lights are provided mainly to improve

road safety at night, but we know that they also help to reduce crime and the fear of crime, and to enhance the night-time urban environment.

• Generally, all roads, car parks and footpaths

adopted (owned) by Roads Service in urban areas are lit. Exceptions to this include rear paths which only give local access, and sections of adopted urban roads where there is no continuous development.

Page 30: Roadway condition survey & Traffic Volume Study

30

Street Lighting

Fig: Typical street lighting.

Page 31: Roadway condition survey & Traffic Volume Study

31

Street Lighting

Fig: Street lighting on the survey zone.

Page 32: Roadway condition survey & Traffic Volume Study

32

Street Lighting

Page 33: Roadway condition survey & Traffic Volume Study

33

Pedestrian behavior

Major factor for the safety on the road.

Unawareness and lack of facilities disrupting the roadway condition

Page 34: Roadway condition survey & Traffic Volume Study

34

Lack of authorization of law :

Page 35: Roadway condition survey & Traffic Volume Study

35

Footpath blocked by tea stall and shop staff

Page 36: Roadway condition survey & Traffic Volume Study

36

Cummunal bin block footpath and half of the road

Page 37: Roadway condition survey & Traffic Volume Study

37

Signal hidden by tress and advertising board

Page 38: Roadway condition survey & Traffic Volume Study

38

Improper maintenance and use of the road :

Page 39: Roadway condition survey & Traffic Volume Study

39

1. THE SURFACE CONDITION OF ROADWAY WAS NOT GOOD ENOUGH AND ACCORDING THE CODE THE MEDIANS WERE NOT GEOMETRICALLY RIGHT. FOR THE LACK OF MAINTENANCE THE ROAD MARKS WAS ALMOST INVISIBLE. SO THE RECOMMENDATION IS THE REGULAR AND CAREFUL MAINTENANCE SHOULD BE DONE.

2. THE ELECTRONIC SIGNALS WERE ALMOST SHADED BY TREES AND BILLBOARDS, SOME OF THEM WERE NOT WORKABLE. SO THE RECOMMENDATION IS THOSE TREES SHOULD BE CUT AND THE BILL BOARDS SHOULD BE REMOVED FROM THERE.

3. THE ROAD SIGNS WERE OLD AND COVERED BY POSTERS AND WAS ALSO BROKEN, SO IT IS HIGHLY RECOMMENDED THAT THOSE SHOULD BE REPLACED WITH NEW ONE.

4. ESTABLISHING CLEAR ADMINISTRATIVE RESPONSIBILITIES AT ALL LEVELS OF GOVT. FOR COORDINATION OF INITIATIVES TO PROMOTE SAFE WALKING IS RECOMMENDED.

5. THERE WAS NO EXTRA FACILITIES FOR BLIND, OLD OR AUTISTIC PEOPLE FOR USING THE ROAD OR CROSSING THE ROADS SAFELY. SO SOME EXTRA FACILITIES LIKE WIDER ZEBRA CROSSING, WIDER FOOTPATH, EXTRA TRAFFIC POLICE CARE IS HIGHLY RECOMMENDATION

Recommendation

Page 40: Roadway condition survey & Traffic Volume Study

40

Thank You