RNB at GANIL - · PDF file14/06/06 M. Lewitowicz 1 GANIL/SPIRAL facility Recent highlights...
Transcript of RNB at GANIL - · PDF file14/06/06 M. Lewitowicz 1 GANIL/SPIRAL facility Recent highlights...
14/06/06 M. Lewitowicz 1
GANIL/SPIRAL facilityRecent highlights
Future SPIRAL 2 facilityLayout of the facilityScientific opportunitiesLetters of Intent for SPIRAL 2
RNB at GANILfrom SPIRAL to SPIRAL 2
See also talks of: Y. Blumenfeld, G. Georgiev and J.M. Daugas
ParisCaen
14/06/06 3CYCERONCYCERON
Guest HouseGuest House
CIRILCIRIL
Experimental AreaExperimental AreaAcceleratorsAccelerators
OfficesOffices
RestaurantRestaurant
14/06/06 4
STABLE BEAMSSTABLE BEAMS
• from C to U
• energies up to 95 A.MeV
• intensities up to 2.1013 pps (6 kW)
RIB production schemesRIB production schemes• in-flight method : SISSI, LISE• ISOL method : SPIRAL (SIRA)
•Use of this two techniques inthe same lab is a uniquefeature
Layout of the GANIL facility
Up to 10000 hours of stable and radioactive beams per year
14/06/06 5
Ion Source
CSS1
CSS2
Heavy-Ion Stable Beam
GANIL/SPIRAL
Container Target
ECRISCIME
Heavy-Ion Radioactive Beam
Target & Ion Source Carbon Target
Marek Lewitowicz GANIL
Available and possible RIBs at SPIRAL
AvailableAvailable, to be controlledPossible, to be controlledR&D possibleSeen with the Shypie source
Kr
Ar
Ne
He
N10 20 30
Z
10
20
74 76
18
6 8
FON
Used for experiments7 elements, about 40 isotopes
PURE RI BEAMS ! ...and recently 15O, 24,26Ne, 44,46Ar
IonI (pps)and E
6He1+3x107
5 AMeV
8He1+,8He2+6x105,3x104
3.4,15.4 AMeV
18Ne4+2x106
7 AMeV
76Kr11+,74Kr11+5x105, 1x104
4.3 AMeV
About 17 different RIB used in exp. 200 RIB shifts/year
14/06/06 7I. Stefan
16FEx,Γx,Jπ
H(15O,p)15OElastic scattering
Si detector15O Spiral beam2 107 pps1.2 MeV/A
Best resolution at 0°
16F structure
(Ex, Jπ, Γ)
R-matrix
Energy (au)Cro
ss-s
ectio
n (a
u)
H(14N,p)14N
H(15N,p)15N
Polypropylene target (H6C3)thickness 2.7 mg/cm2
protons scatteredfrom the target
FWHM=13.4 keV for5.486 MeV α
Experimental study of 16F
14/06/06 8I. Stefan
Elab(MeV)
15N(p,p)15N
Elab(MeV)
14N(p,p)14N
15O(p,p)15O
Elab(MeV)
15OEx,Γ,Jπ
R-matrix
16OEx,Γ,Jπ
R-matrix
H(14N,p)14N
H(15N,p)15N
Sp=7.297 MeV
Sp=12.127 MeV
Sp= - 0.536 MeV
dσ/dΩ
(mb/
st)
Гp=1.3 keV
dσ/dΩ
(mb/
st)
16FEx,Γ,Jπ
R-matrix
H(15O,p)15O
dσ/dΩ
(mb/
st)
Measured excitation functions
PRELIMINARY
14/06/06 9I. Stefan
What about the 15O(p,γ)16Fgs(β+) ?
p
r (fm)
p
β+
E0
p
β+
γ E1
Vc (
MeV
)
p
G.Audi, A.H. Wapstra and C. Thibault, Nucl. Phys. A729, 337 (2003); D.R. Tilley et al., Nucl. Phys. A564, 1(1993)
Competitive reaction rate ?
15O+p16F
E0= 0.536 MeV
16O
E1= 0.734 MeV
1/2-
1-
0- γ M1 τγ=1 ps
Qβ=13.3 MeV
β+
PRELIMINARY
Collapse of the N=28 shell closure in 42Si
Collapse of the N=28 shell closure in 42Si - Beyhan BastinBeyhan Bastin
C Be4444SS4848CaCa 4242SiSi
4242SiSi
_Ean
M/Q
4242SiSi
_Ean
M/Q
SPEG
48Ca
47K
44S
42Si
45Cl
43P
46Ar
N=28
Experimental set-upExperimental set-up In-beam In-beam γγ Spectroscopy: Spectroscopy:
GANIL-Caen
SISSI+ALPHA SPEG
4444SS
PRELIMINARY
Collapse of the N=28 shell closure in 42Si
Collapse of the N=28 shell closure in 42Si - Beyhan BastinBeyhan Bastin
Results: Results: 3838SiSi
48Ca
47K
44S
42Si
45Cl
43P
46Ar
N=28
41Si40Si39Si38Si37SiZ=14
500 1000 1500 2000 2500E(keV)
2+ 0+ : 1081 ± 8 keVref: 1084 ± 20 keV
1185 ± 10 keV NEW
PRELIMINARY
Collapse of the N=28 shell closure in 42Si
Collapse of the N=28 shell closure in 42Si - Beyhan BastinBeyhan Bastin
ResultsResults: : 4040SiSi
48Ca
47K
44S
42Si
45Cl
43P
46Ar
N=28
41Si40Si39Si38Si37SiZ=14
500 1000 1500 2000 2500E(keV)
2+ 0+ : 991 ± 10 keVref: 990 ± 20 keV
624 ± 10 keVNEW
PRELIMINARY
Collapse of the N=28 shell closure in 42Si
Collapse of the N=28 shell closure in 42Si - Beyhan BastinBeyhan Bastin
ResultsResults: : 4242SiSi
48Ca
47K
44S
42Si
45Cl
43P
46Ar
N=28
41Si40Si39Si38Si37SiZ=14
500 1000 1500 2000 2500 E(keV)
2+ 0+ : 770 ± 15 keV NEW
To be p
ublis
hed
PRELIMINARY
Collapse of the N=28 shell closure in 42Si
Collapse of the N=28 shell closure in 42Si - Beyhan BastinBeyhan Bastin
48Ca
47K
44S
42Si
45Cl
43P
46Ar
N=28
41Si40Si39Si38Si37SiZ=14
In contradiction with J.Fridmann et al. [Nature vol.435(2005)03619]
LOW LOW energyenergy observed for the first 22++ state in 42Si 4242Si = Si = deformed deformed nucleusnucleus
Loss Loss of of magicitymagicity at N=28 for Si isotopes
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32N
E(2+) (keV)
Ca S SiMagicityMagicity
DeformationDeformation
PRELIMINARY
Andreas Görgen 15
Shapes of atomic nuclei
Prolate
Oblate
Quadrupole deformation of the nuclear ground states
M. Girod, CEA Bruyères-le-Châtel
oblate ground states predicted for A~70 near N=Z prolate and oblate states within small energy range ⇒ shape coexistence
Andreas Görgen 16
Systematics of the light krypton isotopes
Inversion of ground state shape for 72Kr
Coulomb excitation to determine the nuclear shapes directly
0+
2+
6+
0+
4+
710671
612
791
0+
0+
2+
4+
6+
508456
768
558
52
0+
0+
2+
4+
6+
770
424
824
611346
0+
0+
2+
4+
6+
1017
455
858
664 562
72Kr 74Kr 76Kr 78Kr
prolate oblate
E. Bouchez et. al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 082502 (2003)
energy of excited 0+ E0 strengths ρ2(E0) configuration mixing
Mixing of the ground state
72 · 10-3 85 · 10-3 79 · 10-3 47 · 10-3 ρ2(E0)
Andreas Görgen 17
Coulomb excitation of 74Kr and 76Kr
SPIRAL beams 76Kr 5×105 pps74Kr 104 pps
4.7 MeV/u
EXOGAM
Pb
Acta Phys. Pol. B 36, 1281 (2005)
PRELIMINARY
Andreas Görgen 18
Quadrupole moments Q0 in 74Kr and 76Kr
74Kr 76Kr
0+1
2+1
4+1
6+1
0+2
2+2
(4+ )2
0+1
2+1
4+1
6+1
0+2
2+3
direct confirmation of the prolate – oblate shape coexistence first reorientation measurement with radioactive beam
E. Clément et al., to be published
+ 1.85 eb +0.85 -0.79
+ 2.11 eb +1.22 -0.42
+ 3.13 eb +0.80 -1.25
− 0.86 eb +0.73 -0.60
+ 2.50 eb +0.80 -0.80
+ 4.66 eb +0.80 -0.80
+ 5.07 eb +0.70 -0.70
− 3.40 eb +1.30 -1.30
PRELIMINARY
14/06/06 M. Lewitowicz 19
Study of the N=28 shell closure in Ar chain through (d,p) reaction
First experiment withradioactive beam of
46Ar @ 10 MeV.ASPIRAL/GANIL CD2
θp, Ep
47Ar
θp,Epdd
28f7/2
p3/2
p1/2
46Ar28
f5/2
Transfer reaction (d,p)
47Ar29
p
ν
1.133.33 5.50
GS FWHM : 175 keV
L.Gaudefroy et al.to be published in Phys. Rev. Lett.
See talk of Y. Blumenfeld tomorrow
SPEG
MUST array
Proton drip-line Light nuclei
GANIL discoveriesExotic nuclei
CIME CyclotronAcceleration of RI Beams
E < 25 AMeV,1 - 8 AMeV for FF
Production CaveC converter+UCx target
≤ 1014 fissions/s
Superconducting LINACE ≤ 14.5 AMeV for heavy Ions A/q=3
E ≤ 20 A MeV for deuterons (A/q=2 ions)E ≤ 33 MeV for protons
Low energy RNB(DESIR)
Heavy-Ion ECRsource (A/q=3), 1mA
Deuteron source 5mARFQStable Heavy-Ion Exp.
Hall
Direct beam line CIME-G1/G2 caves
Existing GANILExp. Area
Existing GANIL Accelerators
14/06/06 M. Lewitowicz 22
Layout of the SPIRAL 2 LINAC
x12 x18
E ≤ 20 A MeV, 5mA, deuterons (A/q=2 ions)E ≤ 33 MeV 5mA, protonsE ≤ 14.5 AMeV , 1mA, heavy Ions A/q=3
(extension possible for A/q=6)
MOU with SARAF
14/06/06 M. Lewitowicz 23
LINAG Heavy-Ion Beam Challenge
Choice of the HI source:• Phoenix V2 - competitive for A<50• A-Phoenix - competitive for A<70 (but not included in the
construction budget)• A/Q=6 extension (4 times more expensive than A-Phoenix)
Marek Lewitowicz, GANIL 14/06/06
C
Source
UCx
2000°C
diffusion / effusiondeuterons
40 MeVneutrons
1+ n+
C
Source
UCx
2000°C
diffusion / effusiondeuterons
40 MeVneutrons
1+ n+
5mA
Goal : Up to 1014 fissions/s
Fast neutron induced fission
14/06/06 M. Lewitowicz 25
SPIRAL 2 yields of fission fragment after acceleration compared to other RNB facilities (best numbers for all)
Today Today
14/06/06 M. Lewitowicz 26
Rough Estimation of Yields (Examples)
6x106 - 7x109ISOL19F(p,2n)18Ne18Ne
2x106 - 2x108ISOL35Cl(p,2n)34Ar34Ar
107 - 3x1011ISOL14N(p,α)11C11C
< 3x104In-flight24Mg+58Ni80Zn
104 - 108Batch mode58Ni(p,n)58Cu58Cu
2x104 - 108Batch mode58Ni(p,p2n)56Ni56Ni
3x107 - 1010ISOL15N(d,2n)15O15O
5x107 - 1012ISOL9Be(n,α)6He6He
Yield (min. -max.) in pps
ProductionmethodReactionRI
Beam
Light and N=Z RIB at SPIRAL 2
Reactions to be used: transfer, fusion-evaporation, deep-inelastic
14/06/06 M. Lewitowicz 27
Fusion reactionwith n-rich beams
Fission products (with converter)
N=Z Isol+In-flightTransfermiums In-flight
Fission products (without converter)
High Intensity Light RIB
SHE
Deep Inelastic Reactions with RIB
Regions of the Chart of Nuclei Accessiblewith SPIRAL 2 Beams
Production of radioactive beams/targets: (n,α), (p,n) etc.
light beamsheavy ionsRIB induced reactions
14/06/06 M. Lewitowicz 28
RIB ProductionBuilding
AcceleratorR
oad
S3, n-tof,
Atomic Phys
PRELIMINARY
DESIR
50m
GANILPRELIMINARY
Marek Lewitowicz, GANIL 14/06/06
Operation of the accelerators:66 weeks today (3 beams)
120 weeks with SPIRAL 2(5 simultaneous beams)
Operation of GANIL with SPIRAL 2
3 simultaneous beams for nucl. phys.
14/06/06 M. Lewitowicz 30
Stable ion beams from LINAGRIB from non - fissile targets
RIB of fission fragments > 1012 fiss./s
RIB of fission fragments 1014 fiss./s
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Phase 1>1012 fiss./s
Phase 2Goal: 1014 fiss./s
Buildingsconstruction
ReferenceProject
Def.
Safetyauthorisation
Constructionof LINAG
Reference planning and phases
Possible scenario
Reference Planning
Cost of the facility: 130M€
PRELIMINARY
14/06/06 M. Lewitowicz 31
SPIRAL2 « Scientific Objectives »
Final Version on Webwww.ganil.fr
to be printed soon
Thanks to all (>110) contributors
14/06/06 M. Lewitowicz 32
Spins&Shapes
Position ofdrip-lines
N=Z
rp-process
Heavy and Super Heavy Elements
r-process path
Haloes & Structures inthe Continuum
Equation of StateRole of Isospin
The scientific case of SPIRAL 2
Spins & Shapes
Neutrons for scienceAtomic & solid state physicsIsotope production
Shell structure far from stability
r-process path
Spins & Shapes
r-process path
Neutrons for science
14/06/06 M. Lewitowicz 33
Neutrons For Science at SPIRAL 2:”nTOF - like” facility
•Fission•Minor actinides, mainisotopes•Cross section•Neutron spectrum,multiplicity•Prompt fission gammas•Detailed A and Zdistributions•Delayed neutron yields andprecursor characteristics
•Scattering•Secondary neutron energyand angle differential crosssections•Inelastic scattering
•Fusion reactors•Astrophysics
14/06/06 M. Lewitowicz 34
SPIRAL 2 - Letters of intentGoals:
Assess the technical feasibility, space, infrastructure requirements andcost for experiments
Identify new equipment to be constructed Formalise collaborations of the SPIRAL 2 users Form a basis allowing to define priorities for the scientific programme
of SPIRAL 2
Procedure and schedule:1. Call for LoI - May 26th 2006 - Dead-line for LoI: October 2nd 20062. Evaluation of LoI by SAC + additional experts (if necessary) - October 19
& 20th 2006 will include oral presentations of all LoI3. Call for proposals aiming in construction of new detectors - 20074. Signature of MoU by collaborations constructing detectors in 2007-2008