Risk Assessment in QbD David R. González Barreto 1 QbD Risk Assessment in QbD Introduction and Few...
-
Upload
jeffry-burns -
Category
Documents
-
view
303 -
download
12
Transcript of Risk Assessment in QbD David R. González Barreto 1 QbD Risk Assessment in QbD Introduction and Few...
Risk Assessment in QbDDavid R. González Barreto
1
Risk Assessment in QQbbDD
Introduction and Few Tools
David R. González Barreto
Risk Assessment in QbDDavid R. González Barreto
2
QQbbDD – a systematic approach
TO
OLS
Ishikawa
Capability
FMEA
Pareto
DOE
Risk Assessment in QbDDavid R. González Barreto
3
QQbbDD – a systematic approach
• Target the product profile• Determine Critical Quality Attributes (CQAs)• Link input material attributes and process
parameters to CQAs and perform risk assessment
• Develop a design space• Design and implement a control strategy• Manage product lifecycle, including continual
improvement
Risk Assessment in QbDDavid R. González Barreto
4
• 2.3 Linking Material Attributes and Process Parameters to CQAs – Risk Assessment – Risk assessment is a valuable science-based process
used in quality risk management (see ICH Q9) that can aid in identifying which material attributes and process parameters have an effect on product CQAs. While the risk assessment is typically performed early in the pharmaceutical development, it can be helpful to repeat the risk assessment as information and greater knowledge become available.
Q8(R1) Pharmaceutical Development Revision 1 – from the Guidelines
Risk Assessment in QbDDavid R. González Barreto
5
Q8(R1) Pharmaceutical Development Revision 1 – from the Guidelines
• 2.3 Linking Material Attributes and Process Parameters to CQAs – Risk Assessment continued – Risk assessment tools can be used to identify and rank
parameters (e.g., operational, equipment, input material) with potential to have an impact on product quality based on prior knowledge and initial experimental data. For an illustrative example, see Appendix 2. The initial list of potential parameters can be quite extensive, but is likely to be narrowed as process understanding is increased. The list can be refined further through experimentation to determine the significance of individual variables and potential interactions. Once the significant parameters are identified, they can be further studied (e.g., through a combination of design of experiments, mathematical models, or studies that lead to mechanistic understanding) to achieve a higher level of process understanding.
Risk Assessment in QbDDavid R. González Barreto
6
Q8(R1) Pharmaceutical Development Revision 1 – from the Guidelines
• 2.4 Design Space – The linkage between the process inputs (input
variables and process parameters) and the critical quality attributes can be described in the design space.
Risk Assessment in QbDDavid R. González Barreto
7
Q8(R1) Pharmaceutical Development Revision 1 – from the Guidelines
• 2.4.1 Selection of variables. – The risk assessment and process development experiments can
not only lead to an understanding of the linkage and effect of process inputs on product CQAs, but also help identify the variables and their ranges within which consistent quality can be achieved.
– An explanation should be provided in the application to describe what variables were considered, how they affect the process and product quality, and which parameters were included or excluded in the design space. An input variable or process parameter need not be included in the design space if it has no effect on delivering CQAs when the input variable or parameter is varied over the full potential range of operation. The control of these variables would be under good manufacturing practices (GMP). However, the knowledge gained from studies should be described in the submission.
Risk Assessment in QbDDavid R. González Barreto
8
FMEA - Objectives
• Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) and Failure Modes, Effects identify potential failure modes for a product or process, – to assess the risk associated with those failure
modes, – to rank the issues in terms of importance and – to identify and carry out corrective actions to address
the most serious concerns.
Risk Assessment in QbDDavid R. González Barreto
9
FMEA Overview
• In general, Failure Modes, Effects Analysis (FMEA) requires the identification of the following basic information:– Item(s)– Function(s)– Failure(s)– Effect(s) of Failure– Cause(s) of Failure– Current Control(s)– Recommended Action(s)– Plus other relevant details
Risk Assessment in QbDDavid R. González Barreto
10
FMEA Overview
• Basic Analysis Procedure for FMEAThe basic steps for performing an Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) or Failure Modes, Effects Analysis include:– Assemble the team.– Establish the ground rules.– Gather and review relevant information.– Identify the item(s) or process(es) to be analyzed.– Identify the function(s), failure(s), effect(s), cause(s) and
control(s) for each item or process to be analyzed.– Evaluate the risk associated with the issues identified by the
analysis.– Prioritize and assign corrective actions.– Perform corrective actions and re-evaluate risk.– Distribute, review and update the analysis, as appropriate.
Risk Assessment in QbDDavid R. González Barreto
11
Ishikawa Diagram
Risk Assessment in QbDDavid R. González Barreto
12
Ishikawa Diagram – Minitab Procedure
Worksheet Window – Data Structure
Risk Assessment in QbDDavid R. González Barreto
13
Ishikawa Diagram – Minitab Procedure
Input - Menu Selection
Risk Assessment in QbDDavid R. González Barreto
14
Ishikawa Diagram – Minitab Procedure
Input Window
Risk Assessment in QbDDavid R. González Barreto
15
Ishikawa Diagram – Minitab Procedure
Output Window
Risk Assessment in QbDDavid R. González Barreto
16
Group Exercise - Ishikawa
• Select a process or sub-process and draw an Ishikawa diagram considering the correspondent, input parameters (Cpp’s or not) and their relationship with CQA’s
Risk Assessment in QbDDavid R. González Barreto
17
Pareto Diagram
Risk Assessment in QbDDavid R. González Barreto
18
Pareto Diagram – Minitab Procedure
Worksheet Window – Data Structure
Risk Assessment in QbDDavid R. González Barreto
19
Pareto Diagram – Minitab ProcedureInput - Menu Selection
Risk Assessment in QbDDavid R. González Barreto
20
Pareto Diagram – Minitab Procedure
Input Window
Risk Assessment in QbDDavid R. González Barreto
21
Pareto Diagram – Minitab Procedure
Output Window
Issues:
-Weighted Paretos
- Nested Paretos
Issues:
-Weighted Paretos
- Nested Paretos
Risk Assessment in QbDDavid R. González Barreto
22
Risk Priority Numbers
• Most analyses of this type also include some method to assess the risk associated with the issues identified during the analysis and to prioritize corrective actions. A common method is to calculate:
• Risk Priority Numbers (RPNs)
Risk Assessment in QbDDavid R. González Barreto
23
Risk Priority Numbers• Risk Evaluation Methods
A typical failure modes and effects analysis incorporates some method to evaluate the risk associated with the potential problems identified through the analysis. Many variations of Risk Priority are used. The most typical one follows.
– Risk Priority NumbersTo use the Risk Priority Number (RPN) method to assess risk, the analysis team must:
– Rate the severity of each effect of failure.– Rate the likelihood of occurrence for each cause of failure.– Rate the likelihood of prior detection for each cause of failure (i.e. the likelihood
of detecting the problem before it reaches the end user or customer).– RPN = Severity x Occurrence x Detection– The RPN can then be used to compare issues within the analysis and to
prioritize problems for corrective action. This risk assessment method is commonly associated with Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA).
Risk Assessment in QbDDavid R. González Barreto
24
Guidelines for Ocurrence
PROBABILITY of Failure Failure Prob Ranking
Very High: Failure is almost inevitable >1 in 2 10
1 in 3 9
High: Repeated failures 1 in 8 8
1 in 20 7
Moderate: Occasional failures 1 in 80 6
1 in 400 5
1 in 2,000 4
Low: Relatively few failures 1 in 15,000 3
1 in 150,000 2
Remote: Failure is unlikely <1 in 1,500,000 1
Probability
Risk Assessment in QbDDavid R. González Barreto
25
Guidelines for Severity
Hazardous without warning
Very high severity ranking when a potential failure mode effects safe system operation without warning
10
Hazardous with warning
Very high severity ranking when a potential failure mode affects safe system operation with warning
9
Very High System inoperable with destructive failure without compromising safety 8
High System inoperable with equipment damage 7
Moderate System inoperable with minor damage 6
Low System inoperable without damage 5
Very Low System operable with significant degradation of performance 4
Minor System operable with some degradation of performance 3
Very Minor System operable with minimal interference 2
None No effect 1
Severity
Risk Assessment in QbDDavid R. González Barreto
26
Guidelines for Detectability
Detection Likelihood of DETECTION by Design Control Ranking
Absolute Uncertainty Design control cannot detect potential cause/mechanism and subsequent failure mode 10
Very RemoteVery remote chance the design control will detect potential cause/mechanism and subsequent failure mode
9
Remote Remote chance the design control will detect potential cause/mechanism and subsequent failure mode 8
Very Low Very low chance the design control will detect potential cause/mechanism and subsequent failure mode 7
Low Low chance the design control will detect potential cause/mechanism and subsequent failure mode 6
Moderate Moderate chance the design control will detect potential cause/mechanism and subsequent failure mode 5
Moderately HighModerately High chance the design control will detect potential cause/mechanism and subsequent failure mode
4
High High chance the design control will detect potential cause/mechanism and subsequent failure mode 3
Very High Very high chance the design control will detect potential cause/mechanism and subsequent failure mode 2
Almost Certain Design control will detect potential cause/mechanism and subsequent failure mode 1
Detectability
Risk Assessment in QbDDavid R. González Barreto
27
FMEA Example - 1
Risk Assessment in QbDDavid R. González Barreto
28
FMEA Example - 2
Risk Assessment in QbDDavid R. González Barreto
29
Group Exercise - FMEA
• Using the previously drawn Ishikawa diagram from the selected process or sub-process , and the guidelines for O, S, and D, include several items on the FMEA table and calculate the RPN
Risk Assessment in QbDDavid R. González Barreto
30
Guidelines for Defining CCP’s
Risk Assessment in QbDDavid R. González Barreto
31
Using the Criticality Matrix
• To use the qualitative criticality analysis method to evaluate risk and prioritize corrective actions, the analysis team must:
• Rate the severity of the potential effects of failure.• Rate the likelihood of occurrence for each
potential failure mode.• Compare failure modes via a Criticality Matrix,
which identifies severity on the horizontal axis and occurrence on the vertical axis.
• These risk assessment methods are commonly associated with Failure Modes.
Risk Assessment in QbDDavid R. González Barreto
32
Criticality Matrix
Risk Assessment in QbDDavid R. González Barreto
33
FMEA - Applications and Benefits
• The Failure Modes, Effects and Analysis (FMEA) procedure is a tool that has been adapted in many different ways for many different purposes. It can contribute to improved designs for products and processes, resulting in higher reliability, better quality, increased safety, enhanced customer satisfaction and reduced costs.
• The tool can also be used to establish and optimize maintenance plans for repairable systems and/or contribute to control plans and other quality assurance procedures. It provides a knowledge base of failure mode and corrective action information that can be used as a resource in future troubleshooting efforts and as a training tool for new engineers.
Risk Assessment in QbDDavid R. González Barreto
34
Control Plan – for CQA’s
Product:Line:
Voice of the CustomerVoice of the
Process
Lower Spec Limit
TargetUpper Spec Limit
units Data TypeSample
FrequencyInstrument
UsedGage Capability
Process Cpk or PPM
Monitoring System Response Plan
Product Characteristic
[Area name here] Control PlanPrioritization Method Used:(e.g. FMEA, Business Matrix, etc.)
Reference Documents No. and Revision:
Measurement System Control Tools
Remarks
Measurement
Cri
tica
l
Process Steps
Risk Assessment in QbDDavid R. González Barreto
35
Capability Analysis for CQA
Esp.
Inf.
Esp.
Sup.
Risk Assessment in QbDDavid R. González Barreto
36
Capability Analysis for CQA
Process Bandwith
Tolerance Bandwith
LTL Nominal
UTL
Risk Assessment in QbDDavid R. González Barreto
37
LEI LESCpk = 1
Capability Analysis for CQA
LEI LESCpk = 2
LEI LESCpk = 1
Risk Assessment in QbDDavid R. González Barreto
38
Capability Analysis – Minitab Procedure
Worksheet Window – Data Structure
Risk Assessment in QbDDavid R. González Barreto
39
Capability Analysis – Minitab Procedure
Input - Menu Selection
Risk Assessment in QbDDavid R. González Barreto
40
Capability Analysis – Minitab Procedure
Input Window
Risk Assessment in QbDDavid R. González Barreto
41
Capability Analysis – Minitab Procedure
Output Window
Risk Assessment in QbDDavid R. González Barreto
42
Experimentación
Proceso o Proceso o
SistemaSistema
• Variables de Entrada
• Variables Controlables
• Factores
Recursos
• Personal
• Equipo de Medidas
• Otros
X y
• Variables de Salida
• Variables de Respuesta
En DOE las variables X’s son manipuladas sistemáticamente. Típicamente resulta en una matriz de variables no correlacionadas
CPP’s CQA’s
Risk Assessment in QbDDavid R. González Barreto
43
Experimentación
y = f ( X ) +
Aspiramos a obtener un modelo matemático de la forma:
Risk Assessment in QbDDavid R. González Barreto
44
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Low HighTime
Low HighTime
Low HighRotational Speed
No
Yes
Hom
ogen
eity No
Yes
Hom
ogen
eity No
Yes
Hom
ogen
eity
Particle
Size
Time
RotationalSpeed
Particle
Size
TimeStep 3Step 1
Step 2 – 2k Factorial ExperimentLow Rotational Speed
High Rotational SpeedLow Particle Size
High Particle Size
High Particle Size
Low Particle Size
k=3
Experimental Space
Experimental Space
Design Space Process Variables Output
Case Number
TimeRotational Speed
Particle Size
Homogeneity
1 High High High Yes2 High High Low Yes3 High Low High Yes4 High Low Low No5 Low High High No6 Low High Low Yes7 Low Low High No
8 Low Low Low No
Particle
Size
RotationalSpeed
RotationalSpeed
Time
Time
RotationalSpeed
Parti
cle
Size
Design Space
Control Space
Step 4
Copyright © IBS Caribe, Inc. 2008
Risk Assessment in QbDDavid R. González Barreto
45
QQbbDD – a systematic approach
TO
OLS
Ishikawa
Capability
FMEA
Pareto
DOE
Risk Assessment in QbDDavid R. González Barreto
46
GLOSSARYControl Strategy: A planned set of controls, derived from current product and process understanding, that assures process performance and product quality. The controls can include parameters and attributes related to drug substance and drug product materials and components, facility and equipment operating conditions, in-process controls, finished product specifications, and the associated methods and frequency of monitoring and control. (ICH Q10) Critical Quality Attribute (CQA): A physical, chemical, biological or microbiological property or characteristic that should be within an appropriate limit, range, or distribution to ensure the desired product quality. Critical Process Parameter: A process parameter whose variability has an impact on a critical quality attribute and therefore should be monitored or controlled to ensure the process produces the desired quality.
Risk Assessment in QbDDavid R. González Barreto
47
GLOSSARY
Edge of Failure: The boundary to a variable or parameter, beyond which the relevant quality attributes or specification cannot be met. Proven Acceptable Range: A characterized range of a process parameter for which operation within this range, while keeping other parameters constant, will result in producing a material meeting relevant quality criteria. Quality by Design: A systematic approach to development that begins with predefined objectives and emphasizes product and process understanding and process control, based on sound science and quality risk management. Real-time release: The ability to evaluate and ensure the acceptable quality of in-process and/or final product based on process data, which typically include a valid combination of assessed material attributes and process controls.