Risk Assesment of Lahar Flow Hazard in Merapi Volcano

download Risk Assesment of Lahar Flow Hazard in Merapi Volcano

of 16

Transcript of Risk Assesment of Lahar Flow Hazard in Merapi Volcano

  • 8/10/2019 Risk Assesment of Lahar Flow Hazard in Merapi Volcano

    1/16

    MODULE D

    RISK ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT

    GROUP ASSIGNMENT

    (For Volcanic Hazard)

    Lecturer

    Prof. Sutikno

    By:

    Pradiptya Setyahadi 14/370647/PMU/8191

    Iriansa 14/370694/PMU/8198Siti Dahlia 14/373799/PMU/8418

    Purwita Eka Sari 14/370504/PMU/8143

    MAGISTER GEO-INFORMATION FOR SPATIAL PLANNING

    AND DISASTER RISK MANAGEMENT

    GRADUATE SCHOOL

    UNIVERSITY OF GADJAH MADA

    YOGYAKARTA2014

  • 8/10/2019 Risk Assesment of Lahar Flow Hazard in Merapi Volcano

    2/16

    2

    Risk Assesment of Lahar Flow Hazard in Merapi Volcano

    P.Setyahadi, Iriansya, S.Dahlia & P.E. Sari

    Magister Geo-Information for Spatial Planning and Disaster Risk Management, Gadjah

    Mada University, D.I.Yogyakarta, Indonesia.

    ABSTRACT

    Merapi Volcano in Sleman, D.I.Yogyakarta. The height of Merapi Volcano around 2,968

    meters above sea level and has experienced 84 times (event) until 2010 within eruption average

    is 5 years. Due to the active crater of Merapi volcano is now open to the west - southwest. So

    that during the growth of the lava still in dome and not go beyond the walls of the crater, the

    eruption will be heading west - south-west. The method in lahar flow assessing to settlement

    used qualitative methode include with aprroch is spatial approach, ecological approach and

    disaster approach with the technique of spatial multi-criteria analysis. Result analysis from this

    research namely (a) potential hazards, (b) vulnerability, (c) element at risk, (d) capacity, (e) risk

    assesment. We also given recommendation for mitigation in that area.

    Keyword :Risk Assesment, Lahar Flow in Ginibangunharjo.

    A. Introduction

    One output of the eruption from Merapi volcanoe is lava, which then generates

    became lahar flow. Lahar flow formed when in a volcano crater there is a crater, the

    water in the lake will be very hot when it erupted. The hot water carrying mud material

    and rocks, while the lava occurs when rain fell with high intensity rainfall mixed with

    loose volcanic material to form a stream. Although lava material composed of volcanic

    ash and rock fragments, but the flood of lava can flow more rapidly and faster when

    compared with normal water flow (Daryono, 2011).

    A lahar is a general term for a rapidly flowing mixture of rock debris and water

    (other than normal streamflow) from a volcano and refers to the moving flow. Located

    in the populated area of Central Java, the stratovolcano Merapi (2965 m) is prone to

    lahar generation, due to three main factors: millions of cubic meters of pyroclastic

    deposits are the product of frequent pyroclastic flows, which have occurred on 2- to 4-

    year intervals, rainfall intensity is high (often 40 mm in 2 h on average) during the rainy

    season, and drainage pattern is very dense.

    The Boyong and Kuning river are river through the Hargobinangun village, and

    one of the lines of lahar flow from Merapi Volcano, it is have material can be sand,

    rocks and gravel where the lava material has a volume of 10 million m3. While the

    flow along the Kuning and Boyong river, there are many seattlement areas. So that this

    region could potentially have affected the risk of lahar flow hazard in Merapi volcano.

  • 8/10/2019 Risk Assesment of Lahar Flow Hazard in Merapi Volcano

    3/16

    3

    Risk Assesment of Lahar Flow Hazard in Merapi Volcano

    B. Study Area

    In this task, the area sampled for the identified impact on the settlement of the lava

    flow is Hargobinangun village located in the northern District of Pakem. This region is

    located in the northern district of Sleman, Yogyakarta. Distance sub-district to district

    government center. Wide of Sleman is about 14 km. This area is located at the

    coordinates 77.66708 'LS and 110.42011' BT and has an area of approximately

    4384.04 ha, the total population of 32.561 people, with a population density reaches

    1,551 / km2.

    The geology of this region there are deposits surface of alluvium there are grovel,

    sand, silt and clay along larger streams. Selected deposits of merapi volcano is

    undifferented tuff, ash, breccia, agglomerate and lava flow. This region is located in the

    highlands, precisely located at an altitude of 600 meters above sea level. Tropical

    climate with cool weather as his trademark. The highest recorded temperature was 32C

    with the lowest temperature of 18C. Expanse territory in the form of land area choppy,

    hills and mountains. Based on the location, on the slopes of Mount Merapi. This region

    is located in the highlands, precisely located at an altitude of 600 meters above sea level.

    Tropical climate with cool weather as his trademark. The highest recorded temperature

    was 32C with the lowest temperature of 18C. Expanse territory in the form of landarea choppy, hills and mountains. Based on the location,on the slopes of Merapi

    volcano.

    C. Methodology

    The purposed method in lahar flow assessing to settlement in the Hargobinangun,

    Pakem Distrik of Sleman Yogyakarta by used qualitative methode include with aprroch

    is spatial approach, ecological approach and disaster approach with the technique of

    spatial multi-criteria analysis. Spatial approach and ecological approach is intended to

    identify the characteristics of the physical environment and the characteristics of the

    study area includes the settlements, topography, slope, rainfall, river flow, settlement

    patterns, the distribution of settlements, building the model and direction to the direction

    of flow. Disaster approach is intended to identify the characteristics of lava flow scoring

    the study area, volume, period, distance, and direction of flowIn the review process

    generally includes four processes namely, study literature, data collection, data analysisand reporting, as shown in the diagram below:

  • 8/10/2019 Risk Assesment of Lahar Flow Hazard in Merapi Volcano

    4/16

    4

    Risk Assesment of Lahar Flow Hazard in Merapi Volcano

    Figure 1: Framework process for the study

    1. Study of Literature

    This process is the first step in this study are intended to seek and understand a

    variety of approaches, methods and data analysis in risk analysis lahar flow. It is

    from book, journal and internet.

    2. Data Colection

    After understanding the concept and scope of the study area, is the determination

    of variables and collecting data required for the analysis of both primary data and

    secondary data.

    3. Data Analysis

    This process is divided into three phases: phase analysis petensial lava flow hazard,

    vulnerability level analysis phase of the residential building of the lava flow, and

    risk assessment.

    a. Analysis Potential Lava Flow Hazard

    This process include several stage: at this stage include; Identification of the

    characteristics of lahar flow, clasification of danger level and the danger level

    of committing lahar flow zone.

    Table 1 : Potential of Lahar Flow Hazard Zone

    Zone

    Distance from the vents

    of Mount Merapi Carateristic o f the region Hazard

    Zone 1 Radius 5 kmlocatedin the basin area, located in a radius

    of 100 meters from the river high

    Zone 2 Radius 10 km

    locatedin the basin area and slope area,

    located in a radius of 100 meters from the

    river medium

    Zone 3Outside a radius of 10

    km

    located in a radius of 100 meters from the

    river low

    Study Literature

    Data Colection

    Data Analysis

    Report

  • 8/10/2019 Risk Assesment of Lahar Flow Hazard in Merapi Volcano

    5/16

    5

    Risk Assesment of Lahar Flow Hazard in Merapi Volcano

    b. Vulnerability level analysis phase of the residential building of the lava flow

    This stage covers, identification and classification of building types based

    materials, building of age, the building to the flow direction, the distance from

    the road. As for the classification can be seen in Table 2.

    Table 2: Potential of Vulnerability

    NO

    CHARACTERISTIC OF BUILDING

    Vulnerability

    Material

    Age of

    Building Direction to strem

    1 Woodvery high

    2 Stone > 40

    50 - 90

    (Perpendicular)

    3 Stone >40 < 50 (Diretion)

    High

    4 Stone 20 - 40

    50 - 90

    ((Perpendiculars)

    5 Stone 20 - 40 < 50 (Diretion) Medium

    6 Stone < 20

    50 - 90

    ((Perpendicular) Low

    7 Stone < 20 < 50 (Diretionh) Very Low

    c. Risk Assesment data analysis

    In this process, the results of the potential hazard zone that be overlay with

    lava flow for the results of the vulnerability residential buildings

    classification to the lava flow. The overlay results, will be analyzed by using

    the formula of risk assessment and risk assessment matrix.

    Risk = Hazard x Vulnerability

  • 8/10/2019 Risk Assesment of Lahar Flow Hazard in Merapi Volcano

    6/16

    6

    Risk Assesment of Lahar Flow Hazard in Merapi Volcano

    Table 3: Risk Assesment Matrix of Value

    Table 4: Risk Assesment Matrix of Data Analysis

    Hazard

    zone 1

    (A)A1 A2 A3 A4 A5

    zone 2

    (B)B1 B2 B3 B4 B5

    zone 3

    (C)C1 C2 C3 C4 C5

    very low

    (1)low (2)

    medium

    (3)

    high

    (4)

    very high

    (5)

    Vulnerabilty

    Very Low

    Low

    Medium

    High

    Very High

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    HighMedium

    Low

    Risk Assessment Value

    Hazard

    HighLow Risk

    Medium

    Risk

    High

    risk

    Very

    high risk

    Very high

    risk

    MediumVery low

    risk

    Low

    Risk

    Medium

    Risk High risk

    Very high

    risk

    LowVery low

    risk

    Very

    low risk Low risk

    Medium

    Risk High risk

    very low low medium high very high

    Vulnerabilty

    Where, Hazard = probability of occurrence of a given area being

    affected by cause damage, loss, and death of people

    in residential areas within a given period of time.

    Vulnerabilty = proportion of settlement threatened likely to be in a

    given hazardous event; degree of damage resulting

    from the hazard.

  • 8/10/2019 Risk Assesment of Lahar Flow Hazard in Merapi Volcano

    7/16

    7

    Risk Assesment of Lahar Flow Hazard in Merapi Volcano

    Figure 2: Framework Risk Assesment of Lahar Flow

    D.

    Result and Analysis

    1. Potential Hazard

    Hazard is a potentially damaging physical event, phenomenon or human

    activity thay may cause the loss of life or injury, property damage, social and

    economic disruption or environmental dagradation (C.J.Van Western. 2011.

    Multi-hazard risk assessment. ITC).

    Potential hazard that used in this task is lahar flow in Hargobinangun village,

    because in Hargobinangun village through by Boyong and Kuning river, and it is

    one of the lines of lahar flow from Merapi Volcano, taht have material can be sand,

    rocks and gravel where the lava material has a volume of 10 million m3. And

    there are many settlemen areas, So that this region could potentially have affected

    the risk of lahar flow hazard. The following below map to the potential hazard

    of lahar flow by Merapi volcano:

  • 8/10/2019 Risk Assesment of Lahar Flow Hazard in Merapi Volcano

    8/16

    8

    Risk Assesment of Lahar Flow Hazard in Merapi Volcano

    Figure 3: Potential of Lahar Flow Hazard

  • 8/10/2019 Risk Assesment of Lahar Flow Hazard in Merapi Volcano

    9/16

    9

    Risk Assesment of Lahar Flow Hazard in Merapi Volcano

    2. Vulnerability

    Vulnerability is a human condition or process resulting from physical, social,

    economic, and environmental factors which determine the likelihood and scale of

    damage from the impact of a given hazard(UNDP, 2004) .

    Vulnerability is the degree of the loss to a given element or set of elements

    at risk resulting from the occurrence of a natural phenomenon of a given magnitude

    and expressed on a scale from 0 (no damage) to 1 (total loss). In lay terms, it means

    the degree to which individual, family, community, class or region is at risk from

    suffering a sudden and serious misfortune following an extreme natural event. To

    determinate value of vulnerability based on building characteristic of settlement.

    The following in table 2.

    Table 2: Potential of Vulnerability

    No

    Characteristic Of Building

    Vulnerability

    Material

    Age of

    Building Direction to strem

    1 Woodvery high

    2 Stone > 40

    50 - 90

    (Perpendicular)

    3 Stone >40 < 50 (Diretion)

    High

    4 Stone 20 - 40

    50 - 90

    ((Perpendiculars)

    5 Stone 20 - 40 < 50 (Diretion) Medium

    6 Stone < 20

    50 - 90

    ((Perpendicular) Low

    7 Stone < 20 < 50 (Diretionh) Very Low

    Based on the above data, characteristic of a settlemen building with very high

    vulnerability criteria, namely the building of wood, this was due to the wooden

    buildings are more vulnerability to the of lahar flow hazard from the shape of the

    building stone, so of wood with very high vulnerability premises given a score of

    1 and for a stone with a low vulnerability values given a score of 0.2. Other than

    building materials, other factors that determine vulnerability, namely: the age of

    the building, the shape of the building to the flow direction and distance to the

    river.

  • 8/10/2019 Risk Assesment of Lahar Flow Hazard in Merapi Volcano

    10/16

    10

    Risk Assesment of Lahar Flow Hazard in Merapi Volcano

    Figure 4: Seattlement Vulnerability of Lahar Flow Map

  • 8/10/2019 Risk Assesment of Lahar Flow Hazard in Merapi Volcano

    11/16

    11

    Risk Assesment of Lahar Flow Hazard in Merapi Volcano

    3. Element at Risk

    Population, properties, economic activities including public service or any

    other defined value exposed to hazard in a given area. Also referenced to as

    assets. The amount of element at risk can be quantified either in numbers (of

    buildings, people, etc), in monetary value (replacement costs, market costs, etc),

    area or preseption (importance of element at risk). (Western, etc. 2011. Multi-

    hazard risk assessment. ITC)

    Element at risk which used on this task is settelmen in Hargobinangun Village.

    it is chosen as the location of this settlement has the potential hazard of the lava

    flow. The following below table of number and distribusi of seattlement in

    Hargobinangun Village.

    Table 5: Number of Seattlement in Hargobinangun Village

    4. Capacity

    Capacity is the positive managerial capabilities of individuals, households, and

    comunnities to confront, the threat of disasters (eg through awaerenes raising, early

    warning and preparedness planning). (Western, etc. 2011. Multi-hazard risk

    assessment. ITC)

    0

    500

    1000

    1500

    Upper ZoneMiddle ZoneLower Zone

    Total Seattlement

    Zona Total Seattlement

    Upper Zone 487

    Middle Zone 327

    Lower Zone 1186

    Total 2000

  • 8/10/2019 Risk Assesment of Lahar Flow Hazard in Merapi Volcano

    12/16

    12

    Risk Assesment of Lahar Flow Hazard in Merapi Volcano

    Indonesia is a country that is prone to geological disasters earthquakes,

    landslides, volcanic eruptions, and tsunamis. As a consequence of the state's

    obligation to protect its people, the government is expected to take appropriate

    measures to reduce the risks and have contingency plans to minimize the impact of

    disasters.

    Currently available legislation on national disaster management UU No. 24 of

    2007. The Act serves as the basic guidelines governing authority, rights, obligations

    and sanctions for all providers and stakeholders in the field of disaster management.

    According to UU No. 24 of 2007, the implementation of disaster management in

    the event of a disaster potential conditions include: (a) preparedness (b) early

    warning and (c) disaster mitigation.

    Organizations that are in this region is the area of disaster management agency

    (BPBDs) and BPPTK. Implemented through coordination BNPB. The organization

    runs in accordance with the work program, one of which is the dissemination of

    information, forums of Merapi and mandatory practice. That is a sustainable

    program that is expected to form a culture of preparedness in communities

    5. Risk Assessment

    Risk assessment is a methodology to determine the nature and extent of risk

    by analyzing potential hazard and evaluating existing conditions of vulnerability

    that could pose a potential threat or harm to people, livelihoods and the

    environment on which they depend.

    The process of characterizing hazard within risk area, analyzing them for

    their potential mishap consequences and probabilities of occurrence and

    combining the two estimate to reach a risk ranking.

    Risk assessment in the analysis in this task is the level of risk of damage

    settlements caused by lava flow from Mount Merapi. With the purpose of risk

    assessment outcome data, can be used as a form of preparedness so as to reduce

    the impact of hazards. Based on Table 1 and Table 2, it can be determined the

    value of a risk assessment based on the characteristic of the potential hazards and

    vulnerabilities value. Below are the results of the calculation of the combined

    value of the potential hazards and vulnerability:

  • 8/10/2019 Risk Assesment of Lahar Flow Hazard in Merapi Volcano

    13/16

    13

    Risk Assesment of Lahar Flow Hazard in Merapi Volcano

    Table 6: Qualitative matrix of consequences

    HAZARD

    Zone 1

    (A)

    radius 5 km by

    road, located in thebasin area, located

    in a radius of 100

    meters by the river,

    material stone with

    < 20 age of

    building, and < 500direction to stream

    radius 5 km by

    road, located in thebasin area, located

    in a radius of 100

    meters by the river,

    material stone with

    < 20 age of

    building, and 50 -900 (perpendicular)

    direction to stream

    radius 5 km by

    road, locatedin the basin

    area, located

    in a radius of

    100 meters by

    the river,

    material stonewith 20 - 40

    age of

    building, and

    < 500direction

    to strem

    radius 5 km by

    road, located in thebasin area, located

    in a radius of 100

    meters by the river,

    material stone with

    20 - 40 age of

    building with 50 -900 (perpendicular)

    direction to strem,

    and material stone

    with > 40 age of

    building with < 500direction to strem

    radius 5 km by

    road, located in thebasin area, located

    in a radius of 100

    meters by the river,

    material stone with

    > 40 age of building

    with 50 - 900(perpendicular)

    direction to strem,

    material wood

    Zone 2

    (B)

    radius 10 km by

    road, located in the

    basin area and slope

    area, located in a

    radius of 100

    meters by the river,material stone with

    < 20 age of

    building, and < 500

    direction to stream

    radius 10 kmby

    road, located in the

    basin area and slope

    area, located in a

    radius of 100

    meters by the river,material stone with

    < 20 age of

    building, and 50 -

    900 (perpendicular)

    direction to stream

    radius 10 km

    by road,

    located in the

    basin area and

    slope area,

    located in aradius of 100

    meters by the

    river, material

    stone with 20 -

    40 age ofbuilding, and

    < 500direction

    to strem

    radius 10 km by

    road, located in the

    basin area and slope

    area, located in a

    radius of 100

    meters by the river,material stone with

    20 - 40 age of

    building with 50 -

    900(perpendicular)

    direction to strem,and material stone

    with > 40 age of

    building with < 500

    direction to strem

    radius 10 km by

    road, located in the

    basin area and slope

    area, located in a

    radius of 100

    meters by the river,material stone with

    > 40 age of building

    with 50 - 900

    (perpendicular)

    direction to strem,material wood

    Zone 3

    (C)

    outside a radius of

    10 km by road,

    located in a radiusof 100 meters by

    the river, material

    stone with < 20 age

    of building, and 40 age of

    building with < 500

    direction to strem

    outside a radius of

    10 km by road,

    located in a radiusof 100 meters by

    the river, material

    stone with > 40 age

    of building with 50

    - 900

    (perpendicular)

    direction to strem,

    material wood

    Very low (1) Low (2) Medium (3) High (4) Very High (5)

    VULNERABILITY

  • 8/10/2019 Risk Assesment of Lahar Flow Hazard in Merapi Volcano

    14/16

    14

    Risk Assesment of Lahar Flow Hazard in Merapi Volcano

    Figure 5: Risk Assessment of Lahar Flow Map

  • 8/10/2019 Risk Assesment of Lahar Flow Hazard in Merapi Volcano

    15/16

    15

    Risk Assesment of Lahar Flow Hazard in Merapi Volcano

    E. Conclusion

    One result of the eruption of Merapi volcanoe is lava, which then generates lahar

    flow. The Boyong and Kuning river are river through the Hargobinangun village, and one

    of the lines of lahar flow from Merapi Volcno, it is have material can be sand, rocks and

    gravel While the flow along the Kuning and Boyong river, there are many settlemen

    areas. So that this region could potentially have affected the risk of lahar flow hazard.

    Representation of risk assessment that caused by lahar flow, it can determinate using

    vulnerability value and potential hazard using formula by UN-ISDR. Value of

    vulnerability base on element at risk ie settelmen, so data analysis used characteristic

    building and spatial analysis using GIS. And than, of potential hazard which selected is

    lahar flow, so that the required data is lava volume and intensity of rainfall.

    Based on calculations of UN-ISDR, for the risk assessment of settelmen by lava flow

    hazard in HargobinangunVillage, then there are three zones, namely the risk of high,

    medium and low. Where Hargobinangun village in general are at high and medium zones.

    But the biggest risk in the medium zone. This is due to the location of the village is located

    in Zone II based maps Disaster Prone Areas. so as to risk vulnerability to hazards lava

    flow that is middel.

    Based on the risk assessment of the lava flow in Hargobinangun Village, so we theauthors provide recommendations to the community to:

    1. Building a house in the location on the radius of> 100 m from the river, with a view

    to avoiding vulnerable areas impacted. because lava flow generally follows the

    direction of the river.

    2. The shape of the house building should extends to the north - south, to avoid the

    lava flow direction of flow. Thereby reducing the damage to the house when in

    passing lava flow.

    3. The Material houses of building suggested of bricks, because bricks material

    stronger to withstand lava flow compared with wood material where higher levels

    of vulnerability.

  • 8/10/2019 Risk Assesment of Lahar Flow Hazard in Merapi Volcano

    16/16

    16

    Risk Assesment of Lahar Flow Hazard in Merapi Volcano

    F. Refference

    Andreastuti1, S, etc. 2006.Menelusuri kebenaran letusan Gunung Merapi 1006.Jurnal

    Geologi Indonesia, Vol. 1 No. 4 Desember 2006: 201-207.

    BNPB dan BAPPENAS. 2011.Rencana Aksi Rehabilitasi dan Rekonstruksi:Pascabencana Erupsi Gunung Merapi Provinsi D.I.Yogyakarta dan Provinsi Jawa

    Tengah Tahun 20112013.

    Daryono. 2011. Ancaman Banjir Lahar Merapi. (on www.bmkg.go.id (Badan

    Meteorologi Klimatologi dan Geofisika) access on 13November 2014 (Risk

    Modelling of Lahar Hazard in Kali Putih, Magelang).

    UNISDR. 2004. Terminology: Basic terms of disaster risk reduction. Available at :

    http://www.unisdr.org/files/7817_7819isdrterminology11.pdf. Access on 13

    November 2014.

    Western, etc. 2011.Multi-hazard risk assessment. ITC