Rising LSI Warns of More Defaults in 2016.pdf

3
7/23/2019 Rising LSI Warns of More Defaults in 2016.pdf http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/rising-lsi-warns-of-more-defaults-in-2016pdf 1/3  MOODYS.C  JANUARY 4, 2016 CONTACTS  John Puchalla Senior Vice President +1.212.553.4026  [email protected] Daniel Altieri  Analyst +1.212.553.4701 [email protected] Todd Robinson  Analyst - Corporate Finance Group +1.212.553.4371 [email protected] Chris Tarnowsky  Associate Analyst - Corporate Finance Group +1.212.553.1613 [email protected] Tom Marshella Managing Director US and Americas Corporate Finance +1.212.553.4668 [email protected] SGL COVERAGE IN BRIEF This report and the SGL Monitor, which publishes mid-month, feature our proprietary Liquidity-Stress Index. The index falls when corporate liquidity appears to improve and rises when it appears to weaken. The index takes the total number of companies rated SGL-4, our lowest liquidity rating on a scale of 1 to 4, and divides it by the total number of SGL-rated companies. So the more SGL-4 rated companies there are, the higher the index. Our SGL publications also feature our proprietary Covenant-Stress Index. This index measures the extent to which speculative-grade, nonfinancial companies are at risk of violating debt covenants. A higher reading indicates a higher risk of covenant violations. CURRENT LIQUIDITY AND SGL TRENDS Rising LSI Warns of More Defaults in 2016 Moody’s Liquidity-Stress Index (LSI) broke above its long-term average, rising to 6.8 in Decem 2015, the highest it’s been since February 2010, and up from 6.4 in November. The increase is red flag that the default rate will continue to climb in 2016. Spec-grade liquidity nevertheless remains much better compared to the depths of the last recession, and should be supported by US economic growth in 2016, modest maturities for the market overall, and the prevalence of cov-lite loa We forecast that the US spec-grade default rate will rise to 4.1% in November this year from 3.0% in November 2015. While energy has been driving the LSI’s gains, followed more distantly by commoditi liquidity weakness is starting to leak to select lower-rated issuers in other sectors, albeit not broadly. T non-oil & gas LSI rose to 3.6% in December from 3.0% in the prior month but remains well below its 6.5% long-term average. Companies with low ratings and maturities in 2016 and 2017 must deal with higher borrowing costs as credit markets tighten – adding to refinancing risk and default pressures. Las  year’s high-yield bond issuance was 19% lower than record levels in 2014, according to Dealogic, and spread widening was much more pronounced at lower rating levels. LSI: Long-term average: 6.7 ; Record High: 20.9 , March 2009; Record Low: 2.8 , April 2013  Downgrade-Upgrade Ratio for 2015 At Highest Since 2008 The ratio of all SGL liquidity downgrades to upgrades was 1.74 for 2015, or 141 downgrades to 81 upgrades – the highest since 2008’s record when the ratio was 2.96. December capped the year with a monthly tally of 12 downgrades to two upgrades including nine downgrades to SGL-4, the weakest liquid category. Energy has been driving liquidity downgrades, while metals & mining has followed as  commod demand has weakened in key developing countries such as China. Among the downgrades to SGL-4, fo were in exploration & production (E&P) and three in other commodity sectors. Other liquidity downgrades ran the gamut, including technology & semiconductors, business and consumer services, a media. Energy LSI Continues to Gain The oil & gas LSI rose to 19.6 in December from 19.3 in November as the rout in oil prices has continued to take a toll on liquidity and defaults. The O&G LSI jumped from 4.5% at the end of 2014 continues to edge closer to its March 2009 record high of 24.5%. Among the four E&P companies downgraded a notch to SGL-4, Atlas Energy Holdings (Caa1 negative) will likely undertake a distressed exchange transaction on a significant amount of its unsecured notes in the very near future, California Resources Corp. (Caa1 negative) recently completed a distressed exchange, and Ultra Petroleum Corp. (C negative) will likely seek a financial covenant waiver. Of the two companies upgraded in December, refin and marketing concern Tesoro Corp. (Ba1 positive) was raised a notch to SGL-1. Energy Sector Continues to Drive Liquidity Weakness Source: Moody’s Investors Service 0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0%      M     a     r   -      0      5      J     u     n   -      0      5      S     e     p   -      0      5      D     e     c   -      0      5      M     a     r   -      0      6      J     u     n   -      0      6      S     e     p   -      0      6      D     e     c   -      0      6      M     a     r   -      0      7      J     u     n   -      0      7      S     e     p   -      0      7      D     e     c   -      0      7      M     a     r   -      0      8      J     u     n   -      0      8      S     e     p   -      0      8      D     e     c   -      0      8      M     a     r   -      0      9      J     u     n   -      0      9      S     e     p   -      0      9      D     e     c   -      0      9      M     a     r   -      1      0      J     u     n   -      1      0      S     e     p   -      1      0      D     e     c   -      1      0      M     a     r   -      1      1      J     u     n   -      1      1      S     e     p   -      1      1      D     e     c   -      1      1      M     a     r   -      1      2      J     u     n   -      1      2      S     e     p   -      1      2      D     e     c   -      1      2      M     a     r   -      1      3      J     u     n   -      1      3      S     e     p   -      1      3      D     e     c   -      1      3      M     a     r   -      1      4      J     u     n   -      1      4      S     e     p   -      1      4      D     e     c   -      1      4      M     a     r   -      1      5      J     u     n   -      1      5      S     e     p   -      1      5      D     e     c   -      1      5      M     a     r   -      1      6       Oil & Gas Liquidity Stress Index LSI (ex Oil & Gas) US Spec Grade Default Rate This publication does not announce a credit rating action. For any credit ratings referenced in this publication, please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page on www.moodys.com for the most updated credit rating action information and rating history.

Transcript of Rising LSI Warns of More Defaults in 2016.pdf

Page 1: Rising LSI Warns of More Defaults in 2016.pdf

7/23/2019 Rising LSI Warns of More Defaults in 2016.pdf

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/rising-lsi-warns-of-more-defaults-in-2016pdf 1/3

 

MOODYS.C

 JANUARY 4, 2016

CONTACTS

 John PuchallaSenior Vice President+1.212.553.4026 [email protected]

Daniel Altieri [email protected]

Todd Robinson

 Analyst - Corporate Finance [email protected]

Chris Tarnowsky Associate Analyst - Corporate Finance [email protected]

Tom MarshellaManaging DirectorUS and Americas Corporate [email protected]

SGL COVERAGE IN BRIEFThis report and the SGL Monitor, which publishesmid-month, feature our proprietary Liquidity-StressIndex. The index falls when corporate liquidityappears to improve and rises when itappears to weaken.

The index takes the total number of companies ratedSGL-4, our lowest liquidity rating on a scale of 1 to 4,and divides it by the total number of SGL-ratedcompanies. So the more SGL-4 rated companiesthere are, the higher the index.

Our SGL publications also feature our proprietaryCovenant-Stress Index. This index measures theextent to which speculative-grade, nonfinancialcompanies are at risk of violating debt covenants.A higher reading indicates a higher risk ofcovenant violations.

CURRENT LIQUIDITY AND SGL TRENDS 

Rising LSI Warns of More Defaults in 2016Moody’s Liquidity-Stress Index (LSI) broke above its long-term average, rising to 6.8 in Decem

2015, the highest it’s been since February 2010, and up from 6.4 in November. The increase is

red flag that the default rate will continue to climb in 2 016. Spec-grade liquidity neverthelessremains much better compared to the depths of the last recession, and should be supported by USeconomic growth in 2016, modest maturities for the market overall, and the prevalence of cov-lite loaWe forecast that the US spec-grade default rate will rise to 4.1% in November this year from 3.0% inNovember 2015. While energy has been driving the LSI’s gains, followed more distantly by commoditiliquidity weakness is starting to leak to select lower-rated issuers in other sectors, albeit not broadly. T

non-oil & gas LSI rose to 3.6% in December from 3.0% in the prior month but remains well below its6.5% long-term average. Companies with low ratings and maturities in 2016 and 2017 must deal withhigher borrowing costs as credit markets tighten – adding to refinancing risk and default pressures. Las year’s high-yield bond issuance was 19% lower than record levels in 2014, according to Dealogic, andspread widening was much more pronounced at lower rating levels.LSI: Long-term average: 6.7 ; Record High: 20.9 , March 2009 ; Record Low: 2.8 , April 2013  

Downgrade-Upgrade Ratio for 2015 At Highest Since 2008The ratio of all SGL liquidity downgrades to upgrades was 1.74 for 2015, or 141 downgrades to 81

upgrades – the highest since 2008’s record when the ratio was 2.96. December capped the year with amonthly tally of 12 downgrades to two upgrades including nine downgrades to SGL-4, the weakest liquidcategory. Energy has been driving liquidity downgrades, while metals & mining has followed as  commoddemand has weakened in key developing countries such as China. Among the downgrades to SGL-4, fowere in exploration & production (E&P) and three in other commodity sectors. Other liquiditydowngrades ran the gamut, including technology & semiconductors, business and consumer services, amedia.

Energy LSI Continues to GainThe oil & gas LSI rose to 19.6 in December from 19.3 in November as the rout in oil prices has

continued to take a toll on liquidity and defaults. The O&G LSI jumped from 4.5% at the end of 2014 continues to edge closer to its March 2009 record high of 24.5%. Among the four E&P companiesdowngraded a notch to SGL-4, Atlas Energy Holdings (Caa1 negative) will likely undertake a distressedexchange transaction on a significant amount of its unsecured notes in the very near future, CaliforniaResources Corp. (Caa1 negative) recently completed a distressed exchange, and Ultra Petroleum Corp. (Cnegative) will likely seek a financial covenant waiver. Of the two companies upgraded in December, refinand marketing concern Tesoro Corp. (Ba1 positive) was raised a notch to SGL-1.

Energy Sector Continues to Drive Liquidity Weakness 

Source: Moody’s Investors Service

0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

     M    a    r  -     0     5

     J    u    n  -     0     5

     S    e    p  -     0     5

     D    e    c  -     0     5

     M    a    r  -     0     6

     J    u    n  -     0     6

     S    e    p  -     0     6

     D    e    c  -     0     6

     M    a    r  -     0     7

     J    u    n  -     0     7

     S    e    p  -     0     7

     D    e    c  -     0     7

     M    a    r  -     0     8

     J    u    n  -     0     8

     S    e    p  -     0     8

     D    e    c  -     0     8

     M    a    r  -     0     9

     J    u    n  -     0     9

     S    e    p  -     0     9

     D    e    c  -     0     9

     M    a    r  -     1     0

     J    u    n  -     1     0

     S    e    p  -     1     0

     D    e    c  -     1     0

     M    a    r  -     1     1

     J    u    n  -     1     1

     S    e    p  -     1     1

     D    e    c  -     1     1

     M    a    r  -     1     2

     J    u    n  -     1     2

     S    e    p  -     1     2

     D    e    c  -     1     2

     M    a    r  -     1     3

     J    u    n  -     1     3

     S    e    p  -     1     3

     D    e    c  -     1     3

     M    a    r  -     1     4

     J    u    n  -     1     4

     S    e    p  -     1     4

     D    e    c  -     1     4

     M    a    r  -     1     5

     J    u    n  -     1     5

     S    e    p  -     1     5

     D    e    c  -     1     5

     M    a    r  -     1     6

     J    u    n  -     1     6

Oil & Gas Liquidity Stress Index LSI (ex Oil & Gas) US Spec Grade Default Rate

This publication does not announce a creditrating action. For any credit ratings referencedin this publication, please see the ratings tab onthe issuer/entity page on www.moodys.com forthe most updated credit rating actioninformation and rating history.

Page 2: Rising LSI Warns of More Defaults in 2016.pdf

7/23/2019 Rising LSI Warns of More Defaults in 2016.pdf

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/rising-lsi-warns-of-more-defaults-in-2016pdf 2/3

 

MOODY’S SGL MONITOR JANUARY 4, 2016

Page 3: Rising LSI Warns of More Defaults in 2016.pdf

7/23/2019 Rising LSI Warns of More Defaults in 2016.pdf

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/rising-lsi-warns-of-more-defaults-in-2016pdf 3/3

 

MOODYS.C

Report: 1869

MOODY’S SGL MONITOR EDITORIAL BOARD

 John Puchalla

Senior Vice President - Corporate Finance

Daniel Altieri

 Analyst- Corporate Finance 

Tom Marshella

Managing Director - US and Americas Corporate Financ

Todd Robinson

 Analyst - Corporate Finance Group Kristen Eng

 Associate Analyst

Oliver Alcantara

 Associate Analyst 

Chris Tarnowsky

 Associate Analyst - Corporate Finance Group

© 2016 Moody’s Corporation, Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., Moody’s Analytics, Inc. and/or their licensors and affiliates (collectively, “MOODY’S”). All rights reserved.

CREDIT RATINGS ISSUED BY MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE, INC. AND ITS RATING AFFILIATES (“MIS”) ARE MOODY’S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDITRISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND RESEARCH PUBLICATIONS PUBLISHED BY MOODY’S (“MOODY’SPUBLICATIONS”) MAY INCLUDE MOODY’S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKESECURITIES. MOODY’S DEFINES CREDIT RISK AS THE RISK THAT AN ENTITY MAY NOT MEET ITS CONTRACTUAL, FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS AS THEY COME DUE AND ANYESTIMATED FINANCIAL LOSS IN THE EVENT OF DEFAULT. CREDIT RATINGS DO NOT ADDRESS ANY OTHER RISK, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: LIQUIDITY RISK, MARKETVALUE RISK, OR PRICE VOLATILITY. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S OPINIONS INCLUDED IN MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT STATEMENTS OF CURRENT OR HISTORICALFACT. MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS MAY ALSO INCLUDE QUANTITATIVE MODEL-BASED ESTIMATES OF CREDIT RISK AND RELATED OPINIONS OR COMMENTARY PUBLISHED BYMOODY’S ANALYTICS, INC. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS DO NOT CONSTITUTE OR PROVIDE INVESTMENT OR FINANCIAL ADVICE, AND CREDIT RATINGSAND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT AND DO NOT PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS TO PURCHASE, SELL, OR HOLD PARTICULAR SECURITIES. NEITHER CREDIT RATINGSNOR MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS COMMENT ON THE SUITABILITY OF AN INVESTMENT FOR ANY PARTICULAR INVESTOR. MOODY’S ISSUES ITS CREDIT RATINGS ANDPUBLISHES MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS WITH THE EXPECTATION AND UNDERSTANDING THAT EACH INVESTOR WILL, WITH DUE CARE, MAKE ITS OWN STUDY AND

EVALUATION OF EACH SECURITY THAT IS UNDER CONSIDERATION FOR PURCHASE, HOLDING, OR SALE.

MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY RETAIL INVESTORS AND IT WOULD BE RECKLESS FOR RETAIL INVESTORS TO CONSIDERMOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS OR MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS IN MAKING ANY INVESTM ENT DECISION. IF IN DOUBT YOU SHOULD CONT ACT YOUR FINANCIAL OR OTHER PROFESSIONALADVISER.

ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROTECTED BY LAW, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, COPYRIGHT LAW, AND NONE OF SUCH INFORMATION MAY BE COPIED OROTHERWISE REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED, FURTHER TRANSMITTED, TRANSFERRED, DISSEMINATED, REDISTRIBUTED OR RESOLD, OR STORED FOR SUBSEQUENT USE FOR ANY SUCHPURPOSE, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN ANY FORM OR MANNER OR BY ANY MEANS WHATSOEVER, BY ANY P ERSON WITHOUT MOODY’S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.

All information contained herein is obtained by MOODY’S from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human or mechanical error as well as otherfactors, however, all information contained herein is provided “AS IS” without warranty of any kind. MOODY'S adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a creditrating is of sufficient quality and from sources MOODY'S considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources . However, MOODY’S is not an auditor andcannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing the Moody’s Publications.

To the extent permitted by law, MOODY’S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability to any person or entity for any indirect, special,consequential, or incidental losses or damages whatsoever arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information, even ifMOODY’S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers is advised in advance of the possibility of such losses or damages, including but not limitedto: (a) any loss of present or prospective profits or (b) any loss or damage arising where th e relevant financial instrument is not the subject of a particular credit rating assigned by MOODY’S.

To the extent permitted by law, MOODY’S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability for any direct or compensatory losses or

damages caused to any person or entity, including but not limited to by any negligence (but excluding fraud, willful miscond uct or any other type of liability that, for the avoidance of doubt, bylaw cannot be excluded) on the part of, or any contingency within or beyond the control of, MOODY’S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers,arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information.

NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF ANY SUCH RATING OROTHER OPINION OR INFORMATION IS GIVEN OR MADE BY MOODY’S IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER.

Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody’s Corporation (“MCO”), hereby discloses that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate andmunicipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., have, prior to assignmen t of any rating, agreed to pay to Moody’sInvestors Service, Inc., for appraisal and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from $1,500 to approximately $2,500,000. MCO and MIS also maintain policies and procedures to addressthe independence of MIS’s ratings and rating processes. Information regarding certain af filiations that may exist between directors of MCO and rated entities, and between entities who holdratings from MIS and have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%, is posted annually at www.moodys.com under the heading “Investor Relations —Corporate Governance — Director and Shareholder Affiliation Policy.”

For Australia only: Any publication into Australia of this document is pursuant to the Australian Financial Services License of MOODY’S affiliate, Moody’s Investors Service Pty Limited ABN 61003 399 657AFSL 336969 and/or Moody’s Analytics Australia Pty Ltd ABN 94 105 136 972 AFSL 383569 (as applicable). This document is intended to be provided only to “wholesale clients”within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. By continuing to ac cess this document from within A ustralia, you represent to MOODY’S that you are, or are accessing thedocument as a representative of, a “wholesale client” and that neither you nor the entity you represent will directly or indirectly disseminate this document or its contents to “retail clients”within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. MOODY’S credit rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a debt obligation of the issuer, not on the equity securitiesof the issuer or any form of security that is available to retail clients. It would be dangerous for “retail clients” to make any investment decision based on MOODY’S credit rating. If in doubt youshould contact your financial or other professional adviser.

For Japan only: Moody's Japan K.K. (“MJKK”) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subs idiary of Moody's Group Japan G.K., which is wholly-owned by Moody’s Overseas Holdings Inc., awholly-owned subsidiary of MCO. Moody’s SF Japan K.K. (“MSFJ”) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of MJKK. MSFJ is not a Nationally Recognized Statistical RatingOrganization (“NRSRO”). Therefore, credit ratings assigned by MSFJ are Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings. Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings are assigned by an entity that is not a NRSRO and,consequently, the rated obligation will not qualify for certain types of treatment under U.S. laws. MJKK and MSFJ are credit rating agencies registered with the Japan Fi nancial Services Agencyand their registration numbers are FSA Commissioner (Ratings) No. 2 and 3 respectively.

MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) hereby disclose that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate a nd municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock ratedby MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to MJKK or M SFJ (as applicable) for appraisal and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from

 JPY200,000 to approximately JPY350,000,000.

MJKK and MSFJ also maintain policies and procedures to address Japanese regulatory requirements.