Rising interest rates, lapse risk, and the stability of ... · Rising Interest Rates 15 1510 105 0...
Transcript of Rising interest rates, lapse risk, and the stability of ... · Rising Interest Rates 15 1510 105 0...
Motivation Results References
Rising interest rates, lapse risk,and the stability of life insurers
Elia Berdin, Helmut Grundl, Christian Kubitza
International Center for Insurance Regulation (ICIR)
Goethe-University Frankfurt
Assicurazioni Generali S.p.A.
Frankfurt, May 24, 2018
13th Talk on Insurance and Regulation
Berdin, Grundl, Kubitza - Rising interest rates, lapse risk, and the stability of life insurers 0/13
Motivation Results References
Disclaimer
The findings, views and interpretations expressed herein are those of the authors and shouldnot be attributed to Assicurazioni Generali S.p.A.
Berdin, Grundl, Kubitza - Rising interest rates, lapse risk, and the stability of life insurers 0/13
Motivation Results References
Motivation
Since 2009, esp. German life insurers struggle with low interest rates:Large annual guaranteed rates vs. small return on assets
In the EU: 59% of legacy contracts with guarantees between 2% and 4%
⇒ Deteriorating solvency (Berdin and Grundl (2015))
2016: Solvency II came into force⇒ Market-consistent valuation + risk-based capital⇒ Low discount rates + high capital requirement for guarantees
⇒ Rise in interest rates beneficial for solvency level?
Berdin, Grundl, Kubitza - Rising interest rates, lapse risk, and the stability of life insurers 1/13
Motivation Results References
Rates are currently increasing...
Berdin, Grundl, Kubitza - Rising interest rates, lapse risk, and the stability of life insurers 2/13
Motivation Results References
Our Approach
Simulate HGB + Solvency II balance sheet of average German life insurer in 2015
Interest rates: (1) low (10Y rf rate = 0.5%),(2) sudden increase to 6% in 2 years, (3) gradual increase by 0.3% p.a.
Assets: Mainly sovereign + corporate bonds;calibrated according to EIOPA Stress Test 2014
Liabilities: Portfolio of endowment life (saving) contracts with guaranteed interest rate(=Hochstrechnungszins, 1.25% in 2015) and 30 yrs to maturity
Lapse risk: Policyholders can lapse contracts and receive surrender value(=99% of accumulated funds); calibrated to German market
Berdin, Grundl, Kubitza - Rising interest rates, lapse risk, and the stability of life insurers 3/13
Motivation Results References
Benchmark Interest Rates
−15 −10 −5 0 5 10 15 20
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
Year
(1) Low interest rates
Berdin, Grundl, Kubitza - Rising interest rates, lapse risk, and the stability of life insurers 4/13
Motivation Results References
Rising Interest Rates
−15 −10 −5 0 5 10 15 20
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
Year
(2) Sudden increase
−15 −10 −5 0 5 10 15 20
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
Year
(3) Gradual increase
Berdin, Grundl, Kubitza - Rising interest rates, lapse risk, and the stability of life insurers 5/13
Motivation Results References
Calibration
Parameter Initial ValueSolvency ratio (standard model; no transitionals) 120%Average guarantee in force 3.4%HGB Equity / Assets 10%Modified duration (Assets) 8.3Modified duration (Liability; scaled to assets) 11.4
⇒ Calibration matches representative German life insurer in 2015
Berdin, Grundl, Kubitza - Rising interest rates, lapse risk, and the stability of life insurers 6/13
Motivation Results References
Increasing lapse rates...
1 5 9 13 170%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
Year
(2) Sudden increase.
1 5 9 13 170%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
Year
(3) Gradual increase.
Figure: Lapse rate across cohorts in each year.
Median lapse rate increases from 2.7% (2015) to 7.5% upon sudden increase⇒ High surrender payments to policyholders
Note: 7.5% much more conservative than 2018 EIOPA stress test (lapse rate = 20%)Berdin, Grundl, Kubitza - Rising interest rates, lapse risk, and the stability of life insurers 7/13
Motivation Results References
...result in liquidity need
1 5 9 13 17
−0.02
0
0.02
0.04
Year
(1) Low
(2) Sudden Increase
(3) Gradual Increase
Figure: Free cash flow / Assets0.
⇒ Roughly 20% of initial assets sold over time in case of sudden increase (2)(≈ total debt security holdings of German life insurers in 2017)⇒ Substantial market impact⇒ Fire sales + liquidity spirals?
Berdin, Grundl, Kubitza - Rising interest rates, lapse risk, and the stability of life insurers 8/13
Motivation Results References
HGB Own Funds
Niederstwertprinzip: Assets but not liabilities depreciate under HGB
1 5 9 13 170%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
Year
(1) Low
(2) Sudden Increase
(3) Gradual Increase
(a) HGB own funds / total assets.
1 5 9 13 17
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
Year
(1) Low
(2) Sudden Increase
(3) Gradual Increase
(b) ZZR / Liabilities.
⇒ Interest rate rise worse than low interest rates on HGB balance!⇒ Zinszusatzreserve exacerbates adverse effect and increases even after interest rate rise!
Berdin, Grundl, Kubitza - Rising interest rates, lapse risk, and the stability of life insurers 9/13
Motivation Results References
SII Own Funds and Surrender PaymentsSolvency II: market-consistent valuation⇒ Assets + Liabilities depreciate ⇒ Own Funds / Assets increase due to duration gap
BUT: Best estimate might fall below surrender value⇒ Each contract lapsed can cost own funds ⇒ Reduction of own funds
1 5 9 13 17-20%
-10%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
Year
∆MCV
Figure: Surrender return upon a gradual increase (3):Relative difference between best estimate and surrender value.
⇒ Best estimate < surrender value if interest rates are highBerdin, Grundl, Kubitza - Rising interest rates, lapse risk, and the stability of life insurers 10/13
Motivation Results References
SII Own Funds
1 5 9 13 170%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
Year
(1) Low
(2) Sudden Increase
(3) Gradual Increase
Figure: SII own funds / total assets.
a) Interest rate rise generally positive
b) Surrender payments make (2) sudden rise less favorable than (3) gradual rise in first years
Berdin, Grundl, Kubitza - Rising interest rates, lapse risk, and the stability of life insurers 11/13
Motivation Results References
Solvency Ratio
1 5 9 13 170
100%
200%
300%
400%
500%
Year
(1) Low
(2) Sudden Increase
(3) Gradual Increase
Figure: Solvency II ratio: OF/SCR.
SCR increases as absolute interest rate shock increases with rates (rdown = (1− δ)r)⇒ Sudden increase detrimental for solvency⇒ Gradual increase beneficial
Berdin, Grundl, Kubitza - Rising interest rates, lapse risk, and the stability of life insurers 12/13
Motivation Results References
Conclusion
Rising interest rates...
result in liquidity need of up to 20% of total assets ⇒ fire sales (?)
are beneficial on SII but not HGB balance sheet ⇒ accounting frictions!
jeopardize solvency if increase is too fast.
Berdin, Grundl, Kubitza - Rising interest rates, lapse risk, and the stability of life insurers 13/13
Motivation Results References
Thank you.
Berdin, Grundl, Kubitza - Rising interest rates, lapse risk, and the stability of life insurers 13/13
Motivation Results References
References
Berdin, E. and Grundl, H. (2015). The Effects of a Low Interest Rate Environment on Life Insurers. GenevaPapers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, 40:385–415.
European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) (2014). Technical specification for thesolvency ii preparatory phase. available at https://eiopa.europa.eu/regulation-supervision/
insurance/solvency-ii/solvency-ii-technical-specifications.
Berdin, Grundl, Kubitza - Rising interest rates, lapse risk, and the stability of life insurers 13/13
Motivation Results References
Appendix
Berdin, Grundl, Kubitza - Rising interest rates, lapse risk, and the stability of life insurers 13/13
Motivation Results References
Calibration of lapse rates
Average lapse rate in year t based on German environment:
λt = log (λt − a)
= c + log
(1∑h n
ht
)+ log
(∑h
nht e−ed1∆rht +d2∆Th
t
)∼ N
(µt , σ
2t
)Observations: Log excess average German lapse rates L1, ..., Ln.
1) Repeat until convergence of µc and σc (c ∼ N (µc , σ2c ):
a) d1 = arg min∑
t
(λt − Lt
)2
b) Update µc and σc via ML estimators
2) If λ2015(model) < 0.0286− ε, increase d2 and go to 1).Else: Return.
Berdin, Grundl, Kubitza - Rising interest rates, lapse risk, and the stability of life insurers 13/13
Motivation Results References
Calibration (1/2)
Asset weights based on avg German insurer in 2015 (EIOPA (2016)):
Asset Portfolio WeightsSovereigns wsov 56.7%Corporate wcorp 34.3%Stocks wstocks 5.6%Real Estate wreal estate 3.4%
Revolving portfolio with 20 sovereign bonds, 10 corporate bonds that mature int = 0, 1, 2, ...⇒ Duration = 8.26 years (≈ GDV (2013), EIOPA (2016))
Berdin, Grundl, Kubitza - Rising interest rates, lapse risk, and the stability of life insurers 13/13
Motivation Results References
Calibration (2/2)
Back book with contracts that mature at times t = 0, 1, ..., 29⇒ Liability duration = 11.4 (≈ GDV (2013), EIOPA (2016))
Average guarantee outstanding at t = 0: 3.4% (≈ EIOPA (2016))
Lapse penalty 1− ϑ = 1%
Berdin, Grundl, Kubitza - Rising interest rates, lapse risk, and the stability of life insurers 13/13
Motivation Results References
Solvency Capital Requirements
Standard model of Solvency II: SCR = OFt − OFshocked
Market risk: interest rate, equity, property, spread
Lapse risk: down/up/mass shock of lapse rates
Solvency ratio: OF/SCR (without LTGM or ERM)
Initial Solvency Ratio = 120% (≈ BaFin (2016))⇒ OF/MV (Assets) ≈ 8% (≈ EIOPA (2016))
Berdin, Grundl, Kubitza - Rising interest rates, lapse risk, and the stability of life insurers 13/13
Motivation Results References
1 5 9 13 170
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
Year
Bonds FVCouponsPremiums
(1) Low interest rates.
1 5 9 13 170
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
Year
Bonds FVCouponsPremiums
(2) Sudden increase.
1 5 9 13 170
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
Year
Bonds FVCouponsPremiums
(3) Gradual increase.
Figure: Composition of median cash inflows over time scaled by the market value of assets at timet = 0. Bonds FV are face-value payments of maturing bonds. Coupons consists of bond coupon, rent,
and dividend payments. Premiums are the annual premiums of policyholders.
Berdin, Grundl, Kubitza - Rising interest rates, lapse risk, and the stability of life insurers 13/13
Motivation Results References
1 5 9 13 170
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
Year
Lump-sum benefitSurrender payments
(1) Low interest rates.
1 5 9 13 170
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
Year
Lump-sum benefitSurrender payments
(2) Sudden increase.
1 5 9 13 170
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
Year
Lump-sum benefitSurrender payments
(3) Gradual increase.
Figure: Composition of median cash outflows over time scaled by the market value of assets at timet = 0. Lump-sum benefit are payments to policyholders at contract end. Surrender payments are
payments to policyholders lapsing their contract before maturity.
Berdin, Grundl, Kubitza - Rising interest rates, lapse risk, and the stability of life insurers 13/13
Motivation Results References
1 5 9 13 17-20%
-10%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
Year
∆MCV
(1) Low interest rates.
1 5 9 13 17-20%
-10%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
Year
∆MCV
(2) Sudden increase.
1 5 9 13 17-20%
-10%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
Year
∆MCV
(3) Gradual increase.
Figure: MCV surrender return, ∆MCVlapse = MCV−SVMCV
, in different interest rate environments.∆MCVlapse reflects the return on market-consistent value of a life insurance contract (MCV) that the
insurer earns upon the contract lapsing. The figure shows the distribution of the median surrenderreturn for each cohort over time. The straight and thick line depicts the median (across cohorts)
median (within cohorts) lapse rate over time. If ∆MCVlapse < 0, the insurer makes a loss on the MCVbalance sheet upon contract’s lapsing.
Berdin, Grundl, Kubitza - Rising interest rates, lapse risk, and the stability of life insurers 13/13
Motivation Results References
1 5 9 13 170%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
Year
(1) Low
(2) Sudden Increase
(3) Gradual Increase
(a) Market-consistent valuation.
1 5 9 13 170%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
Year
(1) Low
(2) Sudden Increase
(3) Gradual Increase
(b) Historical cost accounting.
Figure: Own funds ratio: Own funds relative to total assets at (a) market-consistent values and (b)historical cost accounting values. Median and 90% confidence interval over time for the three interestrate environments (1) low interest rates, (2) sudden increase in interest rates, and (3) gradual increase
in interest rates.
Berdin, Grundl, Kubitza - Rising interest rates, lapse risk, and the stability of life insurers 13/13
Motivation Results References
1 5 9 13 17
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
Year
RoA (without depreciation)Depreciation
(1) Low interest rates.
1 5 9 13 17
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
Year
RoA (without depreciation)Depreciation
(2) Sudden increase.
1 5 9 13 17
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
Year
RoA (without depreciation)Depreciation
(3) Gradual increase.
Figure: Insurer’s return on assets and depreciation of HCA book values. The figures compare the bookvalue of assets at time t with time t − 1 with respect to the pure asset return (including coupon,
dividend, and rent payments) and depreciation of book value (upon a decline of at least 10% of marketvalues compared to face values). We show the median and 90% confidence at each point in time.
Berdin, Grundl, Kubitza - Rising interest rates, lapse risk, and the stability of life insurers 13/13
Motivation Results References
1 5 9 13 17
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
Year
(1) Low
(2) Sudden Increase
(3) Gradual Increase
(a) Interest rate reserve.
1 5 9 13 170%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
Year
(1) Low
(2) Sudden Increase
(3) Gradual Increase
(b) HCA own funds - respective IRR.
Figure: Impact of interest rate reserve. (a) Size of the German interest rate reserve (IRR; German:ZZR) relative to the book value of liabilities including the IRR, (LIRR
t − LBVt )/LIRR
t . (b) HCA value ofown funds when accounting for the IRR as a liability.
Berdin, Grundl, Kubitza - Rising interest rates, lapse risk, and the stability of life insurers 13/13
Motivation Results References
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 200%
1%
2%
3%
4%
Year
rG (constant lapse)
rG (sensitive lapse)
(1) Low interest rates.
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 200%
1%
2%
3%
4%
Year
rG (constant lapse)
rG (sensitive lapse)
(2) Sudden increase.
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 200%
1%
2%
3%
4%
Year
rG (constant lapse)
rG (sensitive lapse)
(3) Gradual increase.
Figure: Average guarantee in force (weighted by the MCV of insurance contracts). Sensitive lapse refersto the baseline situation with lapse rates being sensitive to interest rates and contract age. Constant
lapse refers to a situation with constant probability of lapsing for each policyholder, λ = 0.0286.
Berdin, Grundl, Kubitza - Rising interest rates, lapse risk, and the stability of life insurers 13/13
Motivation Results References
Solvency Capital Requirement
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 200
0.2
0.4
0.6
Year
SCR LapseSCR Interest RatesSCR Remaining Market + Div.
(1) Low interest rates.
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 200
0.2
0.4
0.6
Year
SCR LapseSCR Interest RatesSCR Remaining Market + Div.
(2) Sudden increase.
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 200
0.2
0.4
0.6
Year
SCR LapseSCR Interest RatesSCR Remaining Market + Div.
(3) Gradual increase.
Figure: Solvency II capital requirement (SCR) / liabilities.
⇒ Interest rate risk drives SCR⇒ SCR increases although guarantee decreases:Absolute shock is larger with higher interest rates: rdown10 = r10 − |r10|0.31
Berdin, Grundl, Kubitza - Rising interest rates, lapse risk, and the stability of life insurers 13/13
Motivation Results References
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 200
0.2
0.4
0.6
Year
SCR LapseSCR Interest RatesSCR Remaining Market + Div.
(1) Low interest rates.
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 200
0.2
0.4
0.6
Year
SCR LapseSCR Interest RatesSCR Remaining Market + Div.
(2) Sudden increase.
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 200
0.2
0.4
0.6
Year
SCR LapseSCR Interest RatesSCR Remaining Market + Div.
(3) Gradual increase.
Figure: Solvency II capital requirement (SCR) as a share of the MCV of liabilities. SCR Lapse refers tothe capital requirement for lapse risk; SCR Interest Rates refers to the capital requirement for interestrate risk; SCR Remaining Market + Div. to the capital requirement for remaining market risks (equity,
property, and spread risk) and accounts for diversification effects between SCRs for different risksaccording to the correlation coefficients given by the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions
Authority (EIOPA) (2014).
Berdin, Grundl, Kubitza - Rising interest rates, lapse risk, and the stability of life insurers 13/13
Motivation Results References
1 5 9 13 170
100%
200%
300%
400%
500%
Year
(1) Low
(2) Sudden Increase
(3) Gradual Increase
Figure: Solvency II ratio as own funds to solvency capital requirement (SCR). Median and 90%confidence interval over time for the three interest rate environments (1) low interest rates, (2) sudden
increase in interest rates, and (3) gradual increase in interest rates.
Berdin, Grundl, Kubitza - Rising interest rates, lapse risk, and the stability of life insurers 13/13
Motivation Results References
−10 0 10 20 30 40 502 %
2.5 %
3 %
3.5 %
4 %
4.5 %
Year
Pro
fit
Par
tici
pat
ion
ObservedrPrP : βt,1=-0.0015
(a) In year 9.
−10 0 10 20 30 40 502 %
2.5 %
3 %
3.5 %
4 %
4.5 %
Year
Pro
fit
Par
tici
pat
ion
Observed rPrP ; βt,1=0.0038
(b) In year 20.
Figure: Environment (2): Observed and predicted profit participation for calculating themarket-consistent value (MCV) of life insurance contracts.
Berdin, Grundl, Kubitza - Rising interest rates, lapse risk, and the stability of life insurers 13/13