RISC Inspection 19Jan05 - Federal Aviation Administration · RISC Inspection Jan05.ppt/9 19 January...

14
RISC Inspection Jan05.ppt/1 19 January 2005 MANHIRP Integrating Process Controls with Manufacturing to Produce High Integrity Rotating Parts for Modern Gas Turbines Presentation to RISC/RoMan 19 th January 2005 Richard Corran Email: [email protected] Tel: (+44) 1332 764305

Transcript of RISC Inspection 19Jan05 - Federal Aviation Administration · RISC Inspection Jan05.ppt/9 19 January...

Page 1: RISC Inspection 19Jan05 - Federal Aviation Administration · RISC Inspection Jan05.ppt/9 19 January 2005 Inspection of holes in Inco 718 • FPI typical indications (a) & (b): scores

RISC Inspection Jan05.ppt/119 January 2005

MANHIRPIntegrating Process Controls with Manufacturing toProduce High Integrity Rotating Parts for Modern

Gas Turbines

Presentation to RISC/RoMan19th January 2005

Richard CorranEmail: [email protected]

Tel: (+44) 1332 764305

Page 2: RISC Inspection 19Jan05 - Federal Aviation Administration · RISC Inspection Jan05.ppt/9 19 January 2005 Inspection of holes in Inco 718 • FPI typical indications (a) & (b): scores

RISC Inspection Jan05.ppt/219 January 2005

Description of work in last year

• Creation, detection and testing of anomalies (1st

presentation)– Holemaking– Turning– Broaching

• All on two materials, Inco 718 & Ti 6/4

• Developments in NDI (2nd presentation)• Developments in process monitoring (3rd

presentation)

Page 3: RISC Inspection 19Jan05 - Federal Aviation Administration · RISC Inspection Jan05.ppt/9 19 January 2005 Inspection of holes in Inco 718 • FPI typical indications (a) & (b): scores

RISC Inspection Jan05.ppt/319 January 2005

Identification of near term NDI techniques

LastupdateSept 17

-to berepeated

Page 4: RISC Inspection 19Jan05 - Federal Aviation Administration · RISC Inspection Jan05.ppt/9 19 January 2005 Inspection of holes in Inco 718 • FPI typical indications (a) & (b): scores

RISC Inspection Jan05.ppt/419 January 2005

Identification of near term techniques (continued)

LastupdateSept 17

-to berepeated

Page 5: RISC Inspection 19Jan05 - Federal Aviation Administration · RISC Inspection Jan05.ppt/9 19 January 2005 Inspection of holes in Inco 718 • FPI typical indications (a) & (b): scores

RISC Inspection Jan05.ppt/519 January 2005

Identification of near term techniques (continued)

LastupdateSept 17

-to berepeated

Page 6: RISC Inspection 19Jan05 - Federal Aviation Administration · RISC Inspection Jan05.ppt/9 19 January 2005 Inspection of holes in Inco 718 • FPI typical indications (a) & (b): scores

RISC Inspection Jan05.ppt/619 January 2005

Inspection of holes in Ti 6/4

• 5 specimens have non-geometric anomalies (e.g. smearing) and 3have scratches from entry to exit

ReferenceTest block

VAC Probe

Y component of eddy current signal X component of eddy current signal

Scratched specimensexamined by rotating

eddy current

Specimen with scratches Reference specimen

Page 7: RISC Inspection 19Jan05 - Federal Aviation Administration · RISC Inspection Jan05.ppt/9 19 January 2005 Inspection of holes in Inco 718 • FPI typical indications (a) & (b): scores

RISC Inspection Jan05.ppt/719 January 2005

Tungsten Carbide inclusions from tool breakage in holes

• Eddy current detection of WC inclusionsin a hole in titanium.– Inclusions A and B are shown in the Y-

component c-scan– Holes C and D without inclusion are only

displayed in the left c-scan of the x-component.

N0.050.150D

N0.100.075C

Y0.050.150B

Y00.075A

WCincl.

Depth,mm.

Dia.,mm.

WCparticle

A

B

C

D

Page 8: RISC Inspection 19Jan05 - Federal Aviation Administration · RISC Inspection Jan05.ppt/9 19 January 2005 Inspection of holes in Inco 718 • FPI typical indications (a) & (b): scores

RISC Inspection Jan05.ppt/819 January 2005

Conventional E/C inspection of WCinclusions

• Eddy current c-scanimage performed bySNECMA Lab on thetitanium test tube with astandard ET rotating testwith c-scan presentation.

• The indications arehardly detected.

• No possibility to separatefilled and empty holesdue to poor S/N-ratio.

Indications of :

A

B

C

D

Page 9: RISC Inspection 19Jan05 - Federal Aviation Administration · RISC Inspection Jan05.ppt/9 19 January 2005 Inspection of holes in Inco 718 • FPI typical indications (a) & (b): scores

RISC Inspection Jan05.ppt/919 January 2005

Inspection of holes in Inco 718

• FPI typical indications (a) & (b): scores and scratches?, (c) smearing?– The multitude indications as (c) can be related to smearing but the detection is not

reproducible and need to be performed by a technically experienced operator.

• Eddy Current was used with a high-speed differential rotating probe atfrequency 2 MHz: no significant indications were revealed by this technique.

• This NDI overview shows that the defects are too small and/or too nongeometrical to be detected by the available NDI. 

• For the next LCF sample inspections, FPI will be the only control performed toincrease the potential NDI database.

Page 10: RISC Inspection 19Jan05 - Federal Aviation Administration · RISC Inspection Jan05.ppt/9 19 January 2005 Inspection of holes in Inco 718 • FPI typical indications (a) & (b): scores

RISC Inspection Jan05.ppt/1019 January 2005

Turned Surfaces in Ti 6/4

• A test block prepared for the verification oftungsten carbide inclusions by eddy currentand/or magnetometric measurement.

• Each number refers to the position of drilledhole (within circle) with or without a WCinclusion

•Example for the detection of a tungsten carbide(WC) inclusion.

•A phase shift of about 90° shows the presenceof WC.

•In the c-scan Y-image (upper part of image) thedifference is clearly shown between a hole witha WC inclusion (left signal, circled in red) andempty hole (right signal).

•Example of the detection of tungsten carbideinclusions by magnetometric measurement

•The indications of inclusions 5, 4 and 3 areclearly to be seen, while inclusion 2 is toosmall to shine up due to its brighterneighbourhood.

•Empty holes are not indicated.

Page 11: RISC Inspection 19Jan05 - Federal Aviation Administration · RISC Inspection Jan05.ppt/9 19 January 2005 Inspection of holes in Inco 718 • FPI typical indications (a) & (b): scores

RISC Inspection Jan05.ppt/1119 January 2005

Turning of Ti 6/4 – NDI Development – Signal analysis for special anomaly types

• Special process technique of “whitening” filter which performs spectrumequalisation of a stochastic signal– Suppresses distinct frequency peaks– Enhances frequency intervals where signal has low energy

Raw EC data

After whitening filter

•EC C-Scan of anomaly in Ti ring

•Raw data (upper)

•After processing (lower)

0 200 400 600 800 10000

1

2

3Raw EC data

0 200 400 600 800 1000-1

-0.5

0

0.5

1Processed data

•Single EC scan of an anomaly in Ti-ring

•Raw data (upper)

•After processing (lower).

Page 12: RISC Inspection 19Jan05 - Federal Aviation Administration · RISC Inspection Jan05.ppt/9 19 January 2005 Inspection of holes in Inco 718 • FPI typical indications (a) & (b): scores

RISC Inspection Jan05.ppt/1219 January 2005

Detection of adiabatic shear bands using BEA

Adiabatic shear bands (arrowed)highlighted by BEA

BEA of a turned surface,which was deliberatelycontacted by the toolfixture during turning. Themetal distortion producedis clearly indicated

Page 13: RISC Inspection 19Jan05 - Federal Aviation Administration · RISC Inspection Jan05.ppt/9 19 January 2005 Inspection of holes in Inco 718 • FPI typical indications (a) & (b): scores

RISC Inspection Jan05.ppt/1319 January 2005

Application of inspection to broached slots in Inco 718

• Typical NDI inspectionimages showing– FPI (left hand side)– SEM confirmation (top

right)– Eddy current results

(bottom right)

Page 14: RISC Inspection 19Jan05 - Federal Aviation Administration · RISC Inspection Jan05.ppt/9 19 January 2005 Inspection of holes in Inco 718 • FPI typical indications (a) & (b): scores

RISC Inspection Jan05.ppt/1419 January 2005

Preliminary conclusions about inspection of broached slots inInco 718

• Detection capability:– EC maybe more accurate than FPL for shallow and small groups of

plucks.– Initially, not possible for parent material smearing detection.– No difference in the conductivity but one apparent indication detected.

• Further work on going: ferromagnetic analysis (include somereference point in order to locate the indication more accurately)

• Types of Multi Frequency Eddy current Detector:– Hard disk probe: best anomaly images, difficult to handle, the probe has

to be in contact with the surface.– Absolute transmit receive probe (TR): does not provided as good as

images, easier to handle, does not need to be in touch