R~~IM;NA~~··~~AFTSUBJ~~~TOM~~O~·;~VIS;ON QUOT~The Cryptophyta, Pyrrhophyta, and Euglenophyta were...
Transcript of R~~IM;NA~~··~~AFTSUBJ~~~TOM~~O~·;~VIS;ON QUOT~The Cryptophyta, Pyrrhophyta, and Euglenophyta were...
REGIONAL COPPER-NICKEL STUDY
LAKE PHYTOPLANKTON\
Minnesota Environmental Quality BoardRegional Copper-Nickel Study
Authors: David Z. Gerhartl~ ,
Nancy S. SatherJudith E. Baxter
, ..... ··~R~~I"M;NA~~··~~AFTSUBJ~~~"TO M~~O~"·;~VIS;ONDO "NOT QUOT~""L.-.._______________ .._.. .. _ . _.. .._ .... __._.
This document is made available electronically by the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library as part of an ongoing digital archiving project. http://www.leg.state.mn.us/lrl/lrl.asp
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLES AND FIGURES LIST
ABSTRACT '
INTRODUCTION TO THE REGIONAL COPPER-NICKEL STUDY
INTRODUCTION
METHODSStudy AreaMethods for Stratigraphic Analyses
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: SURFACE WATER SAMPLESWater ChemistryPhytoplankton Cell Counts
Dominance and diversity of algal groupCharacteristic algaeIndicator species
Comparisons With Other Regional Lake Studies
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: STRATIGRAPHIC ANALYSES OF FOUR LAKESPollenDiatoms
Comparison of water and surface sediment samplesPresent status of the four lakesStratigraphy
SUMMARY
REFERENCES CITED
FIGURES
TABLES
APPENDIX A--Tables of abundance of dominant taxa ~n summerand October samples, 1976 and 1977.
i
ii
iii
1
447
88
1111131516
191920202122
24
26
28
33
46
- ._ ..• L . • •.. •.. • _... '_" .... _. ~
,-- -'~R~~I-M;NARYDRAFT SUBJ~~~-~O ~~~OR-~~-VI~S';ONDO NOT QU'O'~-~~1.
LIST OF FIGURES AND TABLES
PAGE
Figure 1.Figure 2.Figure 3.
Figure 4.
Aquatic biology' lake study sites.Stratigraphic position of samples analyzed.Classification of study lakes based on totalphosphorus concentration.Comparison of surface sediment samples withaverage composition of water samples, based onpercent of all frustules belonging to dominanttaxa. .
Figure 5. Stratigraphy of selected dominant diatom taxain four study lakes.
29
30
31
32
Table 1.Table 2.
Table 3.
Table 4.
Table 5.
Table 6.Table 7.
Table 8.
Table 9.
Table 10.
Table 11.
Table 12.
Frequency of collection of phytoplankton samples. 33Physical and chemical characteristics of lakessampled biologically and reasons for sampling. 34Physical and chemical characteristics of StudyArea lakes. 36Lake groups based on total organic carbon andcolor. 37Lake groups based on summertime measurements ofchlorDphyll a. 38Thermal stratification of Study Area lakes, 1976. 39Chlorophyll a concentrations (ug/l) in primarylakes, 1976.- 40Dominance for algal groups in summer samples fromStudy Area lakes. 41Phytoplankton species diversity (number of speciesobserved) in Study Area lakes, summer samples,1976 and 1977. 42Characteristic phytoplankton algae of StudyArea lakes. 43Proportion of diatoms in surface water phytoplanktonand proportion of dominants within diatom samples. 44Summary of percentages of planktonic and benthicspecies contributed by the top ten diatoms insurface sediment samples. 45
i
PRELIMINARY DRAFT SUBJECT TO MAJOR REVISION DO NOT QUOTE••_ AI. •
ABSTRACT
A survey of the phytoplankton commun1t1es in 25 lakes of northeasternMinnesota was conducted as a part of the Minnesota Regional Copper-Nickel,Study in 1976 and 1977. The lakes fall into relatively narrow ranges ofconductivity (26-153 umhos/cm), total alkalinity (8-71 mg/l CaC03), andhardness (10-81 mg/l). As a group they are highly colored and contain considerable amounts of dissolved organic matter. Measurements of chlorophyll~ and total phosphorus indicated that most are mesotrophic or eutrophic.
Summer phytoplankton samples were almost always dominated by the Cyanophyta,Chrysophyta, or Bacillariophyta. Even the most oligotrophic of the lakeswere occasionally dominated by the Cyanophyta. Seasonal patterns of dominancewere quite variable not only from lake to lake, but within the samelake from year to year. With few exceptions, the Bacillariophyta was themost diverse group, followed by the Chlorophyta and then the Cyanophyta. Asmany as 40 to 50 species of diatoms were identified in one lake on one date.The Cryptophyta, Pyrrhophyta, and Euglenophyta were the least diverse of thealgal groups and were never numerically dominant. There are clear differences between these phytoplankton communities and those of the ExperimentalLakes Area of northwestern Ontario.
Phytoplankton species composition was remarkably similar in the study lakes.A group of "characteristic species" was identified based on their frequencyof occurrence in the samples. These were: Bacillariophyta-Asterionellaformosa, Cyclotella bodanica, Fragilaria crotonensis, Melosira ambigua, M.distans, Nitzschia sp., Tabellaria fenestrata; Chlorophyta-Ankistrodesmusfalcatus, Botryococcus Braunii, Oocystis sp.; Cyanophyta-Agmenellumquadruplicatum, Aphanocapsa delicatissima, Coelosphaerium Kuetzingianum;Chrys9phyta-Dinobryon bavaricum, D. divergens, D. sertularia var.protuberans; Cryptophyta-Cryptomonas erosa; Pyrrhophyta-Ceratiumhirundinella. This list could be lengthened or shortened depending on thecriteria used for inclusion of species. A number of these species are considered by other authors to be oligotrophic indicators. However, a comparison of the existing diatom flora with the diatoms of the sedimentaryrecord from other Minnesota lakes supports the notion that these lakes aregenerally mesotrophic or eutrophic.
Attempts to separate the lakes into trophic subgroups using indicator species were unsuccessful, although Melosira granulata may have some value asan indicator of trophy. In addition, the lakes contain a number of algaecharacteristic of acid water, and Binuclearia sp. may have value as an indicator of high levels of organic matter.
Analysis of two or three samples of diatoms in sediment cores from fourlakes was consistent with the analysis of surface wa~er samples andsuggested that the lakes have not changed dramatically in trophic statussince human settlement in Minnesota.
The combined evidence from surface water phytoplankton samples, chlorophylla and phosphorus data and diatom stratigraphy suggests that most of theStudy Area lakes are now mesotrophic or eutrophic and have been so for sometime. A few lakes, however, (e.g., Tofte, Clearwater) appear oligotrophic.
ii
PRELIMINARY DRAFT SUBJECT TO MAJOR REVISION DO NOT QUOTE"_ AI. _
..~ ...
INTRODUCTION TO THE REGIONAL COPPER-NICKEL STUDY
The Regional Copper-Nickel Environmental Impact Study is a comprehensiveexamination of the potential cumulative environmental, social, and economicimpacts of copper~nickel mineral development in northeastern Minnesota.This study is being conducted for the ~linnesota Legislature and stateExecutive Branch agencies, under the direction of the Minnesota Environmental Quality Board (MEQB) and with the funding, review, and concurrenceof the Legislative Commission on Minnesota Resources.
A region along the surface contact of the Duluth Complex in St. Louis and"-"'Lake counties in northeastern Minnesota contains a major domestic resource
of copper-nickel sulfide mineralization. This region has been explored byseveral mineral resource development companies for more than twenty years,and recently two firms, AMAX and International Nickel Company, haveconsidered commercial operations. These exploration and mine planningactivities indicate the potential establishment of a new mining and processing industry in Minnesota. In addition, these activities indicate theneed for a comprehensive environmental, social, and economic analysis bythe state in order to consider the cumulative regional implications of thisnew industry and to provide adequate information for future state policyreview and development. In January, 1976, the MEQB organized and initiatedthe Regional Copper-Nickel Study.
The major objectives of the Regional Copper-Nickel Study are: 1) tocharacterize the region in its pre-copper-nickel development state; 2) toidentify and describe the probable technologies which may be used to exploitthe mineral resource and to convert it into salable commodities; 3) toidentify and assess the impacts of primary copper-nickel development andsecondary regional growth; 4) to conceptualize alternative degrees ofregional copper-nickel development; and 5) to assess the cumulativeenvironmental, social, and economic impacts of such hypothetical developments. The Regional Study is a scientific information gathering andanalysis effort and will not present subjective social judgements onwhether, where, when, or how copper-nickel development should or shouldnot proceed. In addition, the Study will not make or propose state policypertaining to copper-nickel development.
The Minnesota Environmental Q~ality Board is a state agency responsible forthe implementation of the Minnesota Environmental Policy Act and promotescooperation between state agencies on environmental matters. The RegionalCopper-Nickel Study is an ad hoc effort of the MEQB and future regulatoryand site specific environmental impact studies will most likely be theresponsibility of the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources and theMinnesota Pollution Control Agency•.
iii
PRELIMINARY DRAFT SUBJECT TO MAJOR REVISION DO NOT QUOTErf
PURPOSE
This regional characterization is intended to describe the dominant taxa
of the region ~nd their relationships, as well as the similarities and
differences between the sites sampled. It provides a basis for assessing
the potential impacts of copper-nickel development. It does not, in
general, provide the baseline data necessary to detect impacts of develop
ment at particular sites. Techniques for developing such a baseline and
ways in which these data might be used in planning a baseline monitoring
program are discussed in a separate report, Biological Monitoring of
Aquatic Ecosystems (Regional Copper-Nickel Study 1978).
iv
......
INTRODUCTION
The phytoplankton algae are generally the most important primary producers
of lake ecosystems. ,Through the process of photosynthesis they capture the
energy of sunlight, transforming it into the energy of organic compounds.
Thus, in spite of their microscopic size, they form the base of the lake
food chain upon which fish and other aquatic animals depend for their
-;~rvival. To a large extent the productivity of the phytoplankton
determines the characteristics of a lake: its appearance, the kind and
numbers of animals present, and even some of its chemistry. Indeed, the
photosynthesis of phytoplankton algae, together with that of other aquatic
plants, literally makes possible the existence offish and the abundant
invertebrate life we associate with the lake environment.·
A survey of the phytoplankton communities in lakes of the Regional
Copper-Nickel Study Area (Study Area) was conducted during 1976 and 1977.
Its purpose was to characterize these lakes in terms of phytoplankton
species composition and abundance, identifying groups of lakes having
similar or differing characteristics. Since the abundance and spec~es
composition of the phytoplankton are directly related to the chemical
composition of lake water, analyses of phytoplankton and water chemistry
data were combined to provide ~ coherent picture of the trophic status of
lakes. This characterization may then be used to help predict and evaluate
impacts of industrial activities on lake ecosystems in the Study Area.
In addition, stratigraphic samples of pollen and diatoms from sediments of
four lakes for which Cesium-137 data were available were examined to
ascertain the relationship of the present diatom floras to those in the
r-' .... -......-j PRELIMINARY DRAFT SUBJECT TO MAJOR REVISION DO NOT QUOTEl
·2
recent past and suggest how they may be changing 1n the absence of
copper-nickel development.,
In the past several attempts have been made to characterize the lakes of
Minnesota on the basis of chemical characteristics, trophic status, and
.. P.~ytoplankton communities. Eddy (1963) summarized early attempts to
classify Minnesota lakes. In the case of the soft-water lakes of
northeastern Minnesota, he included three lake types:
1) Lakes with maximum depths of 20 to 60 m. These lakes are typically
oligotrophic with well-defined summer stratification and no hypolimnetic
oxygen depletion. They have low turbidities and relatively small littoral
areas. Secchi disk values frequently approach 7 m. The phytoplankton are
characterized by a scarcity of blue-green algae and an abundance of
diatoms, especially Tabellaria, Fragilaria, and Asterionella.
2) Lakes with maximQm depths of less than 15 m. These lakes are more
productive than the former, and many show a tendency toward eutrophication.
They have larger littoral zones and often show some hypolimnetic oxygen
depletion.
3) Small acid bog lakes and ponds. These small bodies of water are
dystrophic and are frequently surrounded by floating sedge mats.
Many Study Area lakes fall into Eddy'~ second category.
Bright (1968) discussed the surface water chemistry of Minnesota lakes in
some detail. He noted that lakes of northeastern Minnesota have about
PRELIMINARY DRAFT SUBJECT TO MAJOR REVISION DO NOT QUOTE1--L~ ..__.__
... "..
equal equiva~ent proportions of Mg++ and 804=' about equal equivalent
proportions of carb~nates and Ca++, and slightly higher concentrations of
Ca++ + carbonates than Mg++ + 804=. These lakes have low pH, low
salinity, and low residence time for ions but relatively high
concentrations for some minor elements (e.g. Fe, Mn, Zn, and Cu). Nitrogen
and phosphorus concentrations are also low. Tabe11aria and Asterionel1a
are the'dominant planktonic diatoms, but Melosira is important in a few
lakes. In terms of the ecological groups of diatoms of Hustedt (1938),
lakes of northeastern Minnesota have relatively high proportions of
acidophilous and indifferent species and low proportions of alkaliphilous
species. These ecological groups (Hustedt 1938) are defined as:...
acidophilous - most abundant in water with pH <7, especially around pH 6
indifferent - equally abundant in water above and below pH 7
alka1iphilous - having widest distribution at pH >7
The northeastern lakes studied ~y Bright were not chosen to be
representative of this area but rather to include the widest possible range
of physical, chemical, and geological lake types.
In a study of phytoplankton assemblages in Minnesota lakes, Tarapchak
(1973) found that the total number of taxa, the number of desmid taxa, the
relative abundance of the Araphidineae, and various indices of species
diversity are higher in the northeastern lakes than in other lakes in
Minnesota. The compound phytoplankton quotient (Nygaard 1949) was found to
be lower in the northeastern lakes than in other lakes. Tarapchak also
identified algal indicators of oligotrophic and meso-eutrophic conditions.
!- .... ··"~RELIMINARY DRAFT SUBJ~~~-TO ;';~~~-R -~-~-V-IS~-ON DO NOT QUOTEl
.._...
4
Other recent studies of phytoplankton ecology in Minnesota lakes include
those of Bradbury (1975) who correlated diatom species composition in seven
lakes to enrichment associated with human activities, and Schults et al.
(1976) who compared the limnology and phytoplankton communities of Shagawa
and Burntside lakes, both located in northeastern Minnesota. The latter
authors found that oligotrophic Burntside Lake and eutrophic Shagawa Lake
contained many of the same species and that blue-green algae and diatoms
were important in both lakes. While the expected oligotrophic indicators
Tabellaria and Dinobryon were conspicuously present in Burntside Lake,
approximately fifty percent of the algae in late summer were blue-greens
with Chroococcum, Coelosphaerium, and Oscillatoria dominating. In Shagawa
Lake blue-green blooms dominated in mid to late summer, accounting for 60
to 80 percent of the algae. Densities of most taxa were ten times higher
in Shagawa than in Burntside. However, Shagawa is not a typical eutrophic
lake for this area, as it receives sewage effluent from the city of Ely.
METHODS
Study Area
The Study Area includes 2130 sq. mi. (5516 km2) of Lake and St. Louis
counties to the south and east of Ely, Minnesota. This area is divided
into two major watersheds by the Laurentian Divide. Water north of the
Divide flows to Hudson Bay while water south of the Divide flows to Lake'
Superior. Many of the lakes in the Study area are relatively shallow and
contain waters which are stained brown by humic compounds. However, some
deep, clear water lakes are also found in this region.
r- .... ..... -i PRELIMINARY DRAFT SUBJECT TO MAJOR REVISION DO NOT QUOTEI1
5
The lakes studied (Figure 1) were classified as primary or survey to
indicate sampling intensity (Table 1). Five primary lakes were selected on
the basis of their potential for impact; one lake with high potential for
impact and one lake with low potential for impact were chosen from both
north and south of the Laurentian Divide. Birch Lake was chosen as the
fifth primary lake because of its high potential for impact and its
importance in the Study Area. A further criterion for primary lakes was
that their ecological .classification by the Minnesota Department of Natural
Resources (MDNR) be similar. All primary lakes were soft-water walleye
lakes except for Colby Lake which was a centrarchid-walleye lake (Regional
Copper-Nickel Study 1978). Two stations were located on each primary lake
except Birch lake which, because of its length, had four stations. Survey
lakes were selected to include lakes of varying sizes, depth, and
surrounding soil types from twelve watersheds. Single stations were
located on these lakes. Characteristics relating to choice of lakes are
shown in Table 2.
In 1977 fourteen of the original twenty-five lakes were chosen for repeated
sampling (Table 1). The lakes retained were chosen to include a range of
values of pH, alkalinity, and total organic carbon (factors affecting
susceptibility to impacts) and a range of morphometric types. Single
stations were located on all lakes except Birch Lake where two stations
were sampled.
Field collections of phytoplankton were made in conjunction with
chlorophyll studies and employed a PVC integrated pipe sampler. In most
1- .... -. '~ ~R~~I-M-;NARY DRAFT SUBJECT TO MAJOR REVISION DO NOT QUOTEt
'" It
.6
cases the top four meters of the water column were sampled with this
apparatus to provide a single composite sample. An integrated sampler ~as
"used so as to sample a large proportion of the euphotic zone.
Spectrophotometric determinations of chlorophyll ~ were performed using 90
percent acetone extractions (APRA 1976). Two replicate 120 ml
"'~p'hytoplankton samples were preserved with Lugol' s solution and shipped to
Ecology Consultants, Inc., Fort Collins, Colorado, for taxonomic analysis.
Laboratory analysis of sedimented samples employed the inverted microscope
technique described by Utermohl (1958) and outlined by Vollenweider (1974).
Units were counted in sedimented samples at 56, 140, 280, 560, and 1400 X
using Whipple grids. The counting units utilized were:
Unicells - each cell
Diatoms - each complete frustule (2 valves)
Filaments - 100 microns length
Discrete colonies - each 4, 8, 16, 32, or 64 cell colony
Indiscrete colonies - every 8 cells
Dense colonies - every 50 cells
Cells per counting "unit" were recorded for discrete and indiscrete
colonies. Examples of discrete colonial forms include Pandorina, Volvox,
and Oocystis. Indiscrete colonial forms include Agmenellum (Merismopedia),
Chroococcus, and Crucigenia. Examples of dense colonies are Microcystis,
Aphanothece, and other coccoid blue-greens. In 1977 the number of cells
per unit was recorded whenever there were multiple cells per unit. Diatoms
...._- ----.- --- - ..._-~-
1- ....., PRELIMINARY DRAFT SUBJECT TO MAJOR REVISION DO NOT QUOTEIl..---- _
1Il
. 7
were subjected to sulfuric acid-potassium dichromate digestion and
identified from permanent Hyrax slide mounts prepared from the sedimentedt,
material.
For calculations of dominance the mean density of each taxon (in units/ml)
was calculated for all replicate samples at all stations in a lake on one<~ : .. : ·.,...·... jl
date.
Methods for StratigraFhic Analyses
Stratigraphic analyses were performed by project staff using samples from
cores collected by the Leaching/Pathways Study staff. Cesium-137 analyses
were performed by Dr. David Edgington of Argonne National Laboratory.
Pollen samples were prepared by standard methods (Faegri and Iverson 1964),
and mounted in silicone oil. All grains on a coverslip 18 rom square were
counted at a magnification of 400X. Sediment samples for diatom analyses
were digested in cold Chromerge solution for one week and identified from
permanent Hyrax slide mounts. Complete details of all analytical
procedures including taxonomic criteria used in the diatom analyses of
stratigraphic materials are found in the Aquatic Biology Operations Manual
(Regional Copper-Nickel Study 1977).
To assure that one sample from each lake predates modern settlement, two
stratigraphic levels per lake were analyzed for the percentage of Ambrosia
(ragweed) pollen. This weed increases in abundance whenever land is broken
for agricultural purposes. Its pollen can be distributed by wind for
hundreds of miles; therefore, a rise in Ambrosia pollen is used as a
PRELIMINARY DRAFT SUBJECT TO MAJOR REVISION DO NOT QUOTE.•_ 4.
'8
time-marker reflecting the beginning of agriculture on the Great Plains as
well as in the loca~ area. Rises of a few percent are typical for
northeastern Minnesota lakes (Bradbury and Megard 1972).
Depths of the two pollen samples were chosen to frame broadly the probable
depth of the Ambrosia rise as calculated from deposition rates based on
Cesium-137 data, assuming the Cesium-137 peak corresponds to 1963.
Stratigraphic levels of the diatom samples were then chosen to assure at
least one sample above and at least one below the Ambrosia rise.
Stratigraphic levels of samples analyzed for pollen and for diatoms are
illustrated in Figure 2 along with Cesium-I37 profiles for the cores.
Since not all diatom taxa preserve equally well in the sediments, one set
of counts was made as near as possible to the surface sedim~nt, which
should most clearly reflect the present diatom flora. These counts of
surface sediments help to separate the effects of differential breakage and
corrosion from those of actual differences in floristic composition through
time.
RESULTS AND BISCUSSION: SURFACE-WATER SAMPLES
Water Chemistry
The Study Area lakes are listed in Table 3, together with their physical
and chemical characteristics, in order of increasing values for Schindler's
(1971) ratio. As a group the lakes fall into relatively narrow ranges of
conductivity, alkalinity, and hardness. They are soft-water lakes (only
Tofte has a total alkalinity greater than 50) with pH values generally near
,_ ..... - .... -
1 __~~_E=IMINARY DRAFT SUBJ.~.CT T?.~~~.OR REVISION DO NOT QUOTE
'9
the neutral point (7.0). The lakes appear less similar when their sulfate
(range=3-30 mg/l) a~d silica (range=0.4-9 mg/l) contents are examined, and
-it seems. possible that silicon might occasionally limit diatom growth in
lakes such as Triangle, Long, Turtle, Pine, and Seven Beaver. The lakes as
a group are highly colored and contain considerable amounts of dissolved
organic material. Three distinct subgroups of lakes may be recognized on
the .basis of total organlc carbon content (Table 4). Since dissolved humic
compounds appear to play a role in complexing metals and ameliorating their
toxicity, it i~ likely that the phytoplankton communities of lakes in these
subgroups will respond quite differently to pollution by heavy metals (e.g.
see Gerhart and Davis 1978).
Vollenweider (1968) has attempted to correlate the total phosphorus content
of lakes with their trophic condition. He describes the following
categories:
TROPHIC CONBITION - -- -- Total P (ug/l)
ultra-oligotrophic
oligo-mesotrophic
meso-eutrophic
eutrophic
hypereutrophic-
<5
5-10
10-30
30-100
-- ->100
By applying these categories to summertime average data from the Study Area
lakes (Figure 3, hatched bars), one finds that only Tofte falls in the
oligo-mesotrophic range while 14 lakes are classified as meso-eutrophic and
10
10 as relatively eutrophic. Data from October, 1976, (Figure 3, dark bars)
show the same basic, pattern with Tofte as oligo-mesotrophic, 17 lakes in
the mes~-eutrophic category, and 4 in the eutrophic category. The greatest
difference between summertime and October values appears on Clearwater Lake
which was only sampled twice. This suggests that the high summer value for
total phosphorus in Clearwater may have been due to sample contamination.
Other data from Clearwater Lake, particularly chlorophyll data (Table 5),
suggest that the October value for total phosphorus is more accurate. On
this basis Clearwater Lake would be at the low end of the meso-eutrophic
category. This classification of lakes by phosphorus content is tentative
because it is based on so few samples.
The fact that most of these lakes do not stratify in summer, or stratify
only weakly (Table 6), contributes to increased productivity S1nce
nutrients are not trapped in the hypolimnion where they are unavailable to
algae. Data on dissolved inorganic nitrogen suggest that nitrogen
limitation may also be important in some lakes (e.g. Tofte, Triangle, Big,
Bass, Turtle, Sand, Long, and South McDougal). At the moment these sorts
of conclusions must be drawn with extreme caution since the data in Table 3
were derived from only a few measurements.
In Table 5 the lakes are grouped into three categories based on their
summertime chlorophyll ~ concentrations. Again, most of the lakes fall
into mesotrophic/eutrophic categories. It is likely that there is some
correlation between summer chlorophyll levels and Schindler's ratio, but
the chlorophyll data are too few to warrant a detailed analysis. The
PRELIMINARY DRAFT SUBJECT TO MAJOR REVISION DO NOT QUOTE..-...
_.~ ...
11
classification of the lakes presented in Table 5 must be viewed as a~
tentative one since, 'only one or two summertime chlorophyll measurements
were made on the survey lakes. It should also be noted that the use of an
integrated pipe sampler on stratified lakes may pose pro~lems ~n the
interpretation of chlorophyll results if this sampler extends into the
metalimnion or hypolimnion. During summer stratification sedimenting cells
may concentrate in the metalimnion or hypolimnion, or blooms may occur in
the metalimnion.
In 1976 chlorophyll measurements on the primary lakes were made more
frequently (Table 7). Chlorophyll maxima generally occurred in August and
September in these lakes, and concentrations were similar in all of the
primary lakes during these months. -In contrast, se:veral of the survey
lakes (Bear Island, Triangle, Perch, Bass, and Turtle) had significantly
higher chlorophyll concentrations ~n October than in July. With the
exception of Turtle, all of these lakes stratify during the summer, and the
fall blooms are probably related to the breakdown of stratification and
subsequent mixing of nutrients or cells from the hypolimnion.
Phytoplankton eell eounts
f)ominance and Diversity of Alga16roups--The summer phytoplankton samples
were generally dominated (in terms of· total units counted) b'y··"the
Cyanophyta, Chrysophyta, and Bacillariophyta. Only a few lakes were
dominated by the Chlorophyta (Table 8). There was no clear relationship
between the dominant groups and the trophic condition of the lakes. For
~_._.... , .~ ~RELIMINARY DRAFT SUBJECT TO ~'~~-~'~'-~-~~~I-ONDO NOT QUOTEL.-......-. ._
12
example, Tofte, Clearwater, and Bass lakes, probably the most oligotrophic
of the Study Area lpkes,were all occasionally dominated by blue-green
algae. This finding contradicts generally accepted ideas about
oligotrophic lakes but is in agreement with the information on oligotrophic
Burntside Lake reported by Schults et ale (1976).
In 1976 five samples were collected from the primary lakes during the
ice-free season, prov~ding some information regarding the seasonal
succession of algal groups in these lakes. In spite of the presence of
similar species and other limnological similarities among the primary
lakes, no consistent pattern of succession emerges from the data. In Birch
and White Iron lakes large midsummer populations of blue-green algae
declined in the autumn and were replaced by blooms of diatoms. Gabbro Lake
was dominated by diatoms throughout the summer, while blue-greens and
flagellates increased in abundance in September and October. Colby Lake
was dominated by Chrysophytes (Dinobryon) until October when blue-green
algae become dominant. Autumn data are not available for Seven Beaver
Lake, but blue-greens and diatoms were dominant during the summer. It is
likely that patterns of dominance are quite variable not only from lake to
lake, but within the same lake from year to year. For example, of the
fourteen lakes sampled in July, 1977, only six had the same dominant algal
group that was present when the lakes. were sampled in July or August, 1976.
In most cases dominance was shared by several or many algal species, but
occasionally a single algal genus or species showed exceptionally strong
dominance. This was especially true of the Chrysophyte Dinobryon (e.g.
1--"" ...~ ~RELIMINARY DRAFT SUBJECT TO ~~-:;O~-~'~-VI-S'I-ONDO NOT QUOTE
13
Pine, Colby, and Bearhead lakes, summer 1976) and the green alga
Chlorococcum humicoli (Wynne and White Iron lakes, summer 1977).
An examination of species diversity (number of species found) within algal
groups yields a much clearer picture for the Study Area lakes than the
analysis of dominant groups (Table 9). With few exceptions, the diatoms
were the most diverse group, followed by the greens and then the
blue-greens. As many.as 40 to 50 species of diatoms were identified 1n one
lake on one date. The green algae, while usually quite diverse, were
usually not dominant in these lakes; the reverse was true of the
Chrysophytes. Extremely low species diversity in Wynne and Perch lakes
during the summer of 1977 was accompanied by the presence of Chlorococcum
humicoli as a dominant green alga in both cases. The Cryptophyta,
Pyrrhophyta, and Euglenophyta were the least diverse of the algal groups
and were never numerically dominant.
Characteristic-Algae--The dominant species within each algal group for all
summer and October samples are tabulated in appendix A, with densities
(units/ml) given only when a taxon is dominant on a date. The total
density of each group is also tabulated. Dominant species are defined as
the five most abundant species in the groups Bacillariophyta, Chlorophyta,
Cyanophyta, and Chrysophyta, and two most abundant in Cryptophyta and
Pyrrhophyta. The species composition of the phytoplankton samples were
remarkably similar in the lakes studied and it is possible to identify a
group of "characteristic species" based on their frequency of occurrence in
the samples (Table 10). This similarity of algal communities is likely due
PRELIMINARY DRAFT SUBJECT TO MAJOR REVISION DO NOT QUOTE
14
in part to the relatively similar conditions of alkalinity, hardness, and
pH found in these lakes, although many of the species listed in Table 10
are widely distributed. This list is an arbitrary one in that it includes
only those spec1es present in more than two-thirds of the lakes during at
least two sampling seasons. This criterion could be made either more or
less restrictive, thus shortening or expanding the list. For example, if
the two-thirds criterion were relaxed to, say, one-half, species such as
the following would be included: Bacillariophyta-Rhizosolenia eriensis,
Synedra delicatissima, Achnanthes spp.; Chlorophyta-eosmarium sp.,
Crucigenia tetrapedia, Scenedesmus quadricauda; Cyanophyta-Anabaena spp.,
Aphanocapsa elachista, Coelosphaerium Naegelianum; Chrysophyta-Synura
avella, eentritractus belanophorus, Dinobryon cylindricum and sociale,
Mallomonas akrokomos, Mallomonas sp. However, for the purpose of
identifying future changes in species composition in this region, the
shorter list in Table 10 is probably more useful.
In examining Table 10 it becomes apparent that the percentages in both the
"Dominant" and "Present" columns are generally higher in 1976 than in the
same sampling season in 1977. The reason for this phenomenon is not known,
but it may be worth noting that the two years were very different in terms
of precipitation. The year 1976 was extremely dry and many lakes
experienced low water levels; precipitation in 1977 was·more typical for
the region. Precipitation may affect phytoplankton communities by
providing plant nutrients through runoff and from rain falling directly on
a lake's surface; and, especially in small lakes, it may have a
1-· ~ ~RELIMINARY DRAFT SUBJECT TO ~.~J~~ R~~-ISI-ON DO NOT QUOTE!
15
considerable effect on a lake's flushing time. It seems possible that t~e
lake environments, and hence phytoplankton communities, may be more similar
in dry years. Contributing to the difference between the frequency of
species presences in 1976 and 1977 is the difference in sampling intensity;
:·-;~in 1976 two replicate samples were analyzed from two or more stations in
primary lakes. Rare species were thus more likely to be sampled in 1976
than in 1977 in pr1mary lakes.
Indicator Species--Although an exhaustive study of indicator species was
not made, attempts to separate the Study Area lakes into trophic subgroups
using indicators were generally unsuccessful. This is perhaps not
surprising since most of the lakes appear to fall near the middle of the
trophic spectrum. Thus, the eutrophic indicators Anabaena flos-aquae and
Aphanizomenon flos-aquae were present in lakes from all three of the
chlorophyll categories in Table 5. The same was true of Aphanocapsa
elachista, which Tarapchak (1973) considers an oligotrophic indicator in
Minnesota lakes, and of Chroococcus dispersus, which he considers a
mesotrophic-eutrophic indicator. An attempt to separate the lakes based on
the number of desmid species also proved futile. The only species which
appeared to have some value as an indicator of trophy was the diatom
Melosira granulata. In the summers of 1976 and 1977 this species was
present only in Colby, Birch, Seven Beaver, White Iron, Gabbro, Long, Fall,
Wynne, Sand, and Bear Island lakes. It is a generally accepted indicator
of eutrophy (e.g. Lowe 1974).
A number of species characteristic of acid waters are found in these lakes.
These include Ankistrodesmos falcatos, Binuclearia sp., Cyclotella
1--- -. -. ~RELIMINARY DRAFT SUBJECT TO ~.~~.~.~ RE~-I~I-ON DO NOT QUOTEL
, . 16
bodanica, Centritractus be1anophorus, and Aphanocapsa delicatissima.
Binuclearia sp. may, have value as an indicator of organic matter (Prescott
1962). In the Summers of 1976 and 1977 it was present as a dominant only
in Cloquet, Greenwood, Pine, South McDougal, Slate, Big, and Bearhead
lakes. It was also observed in several other lakes but was absent in lakes
of the lowest TOC category in Table 4.
eomparisons-With ether-Regional Lake-Studies
A number of regional lakes studies have been conducted which include
attempts to classify algae according to their trophic distribution.
Unfortunately, the results of these studies are rarely consistent.
Tarapchak (1973) listed thirteen species as characteristic of oligotrophic
Minnesota lakes. Of these, Aphanocapsa elachista, Chrysosphaerella
longispina, Synura uvella, and Cyclotella comta (=bodanica?) are common ~n
the lakes discussed in the present study. Since most of these lakes are
definitely not oligotrophic, the use of these species as oligotrophic
indicators may be questioned. Similarly, Rawson (1956), in his study of
lakes of western Canada (including the Great Lakes), presented lists of
oligotrophic and mesotrophic algal species. Asterionella formosa,
Tabellaria fenestrata, Dinobryon divergens, and Melosira granulata were all
considered oligotrophic species, while Fragilaria crotonensis, eeratium
hirundinella, eoelosphaerium Naegelianum, Anabaena spp., and Aphanizomenon
flos-aquae were considered mesotrophic. Although his mesotrophic category
is consistent with the results from the present study, his oligotrophic
category is not. Based on species occurrences in the Great Lakes, Stoermer
PRELIMINARY DRAFT SUBJECT TO MAJOR REVISION DO NOT QUOTE
17
(1978) found the distributions of Melosira distans, ehrysosphaerella
longispina, Dinobryon bavaricum, and Cyclotella comta (=bodanica?) to be
primarily oligotrophic, while the distributions of Melosira granulata,
Ankistrodesmus falcatus, Cryptomonas erosa, and Aphanizomenon flos-aquae
were primarily eutrophic. Ubiquitous forms included Asterionella formosa,
Fragilaria crotonensis, Rhizosolenia eriensis, Botryococcus Braunii,
Dinobryon divergens, and Anabaena flos-aquae. Finally, in studies of
Finnish lakes Jarnefelt (1952) classified Agmenellum quadruplicatum,
Dinobryon divergens, and fiinobryon bavaricum as oligotrophic indicator
species. Clearly, there ~s much disagreement on this subject, especially
with regard to oligotrophic indicators. Many species considered
oligotrophic by these authors are common or even characteristic of the
moderately productive lakes of the Study Area. Rawson (1956) discussed the
problems of identifying reliable oligotrophic indicator species and
suggested that most of the species in oligotrophic lakes are not
distinctive of that condition but in fact are widely tolerant forms. An
alternative explanation, also considered by Rawson, is that many
physiological varieties of algae have developed which we are unable to
distinguish morphologically.
In spite of these problems concerning specific indicator algae, it is
possible to distinguish the phytoplankton communities of lakes of the Study
Area from those of other geographical regions. Bright (1968) and Tarapchak
(1973) have indicated differences in species composition between lakes of
northeastern Minnesota and those of central and southwest Minnesota.
PRELIMINARY DRAFT SUBJECT TO MAJOR REVISION DO NOT QUOTE
18
Bright, for example, points out that while Tabellaria, Asterionella, and
Melosira are important diatoms of the northeast lakes, the nutrient-rich
lakes of southwestern Minnesota are characterized by Fragilaria, Synedra,
and Melosira.
It is perhaps not surprising that such differences occur when comparing
lakes of the paririe with those of the northeastern forests. However, the
Study Area lakes also differ in species composition from lakes of the
Experimental Lakes Area (ELA) of northwestern Ontario, Canada (Schindler
and Holmgren 1971). These Canadian lakes have considerably lower
conductivities (10-35 umhos/cm) and bicarbonate concentrations (0.2-9.9
mg/l HC03-) than lakes of the Study Area. Most of the ELA lakes were
dominated by the Chrysophyta. The Cyanophyta and Bacillariophyta appear to
be less abundant in the Canadian lakes than in Study Area lakes, while the
Chrysophyta, Cryptophyta, and Pyrrhophyta appear to be more abundant. In
terms of number of species, diatom diversity may be somewhat less, while
dinoflagellate, cryptomonad, and chrysophyte diversity are clearly greater
in ELA lakes. Some species are common to both lake groups (e.g.
eoelosphaerium Koetzingianum, erucigenia tetrapedia, Dinobryon spp.,
Asterionella formosa, Tabellaria fenestrata, Rhizosolenia eriensis, and
Botryococcus Braunii), but many of the important ELA algae are rare or
absent in the Study Area lakes.
A preliminary survey of diatom communities in nineteen lakes of the
Sylvania Recreation Area of the Ottawa National Forest, Michigan, was made
by Crumrine and Beeton (1975). Important diatoms included Asterionella
PRELIMINARY DRAFT SUBJECT TO MAJOR REVISION DO NOT QUOTE
19
formosa, Tabellaria flQcculosa, Fragilaria pinnata, and Fragilaria
erotonensis. Non-diatoms were also important, but these were not examined
quantitatively. Based on the occurrence of Tabellaria flocculosa (Stockner
1971) and the relatively high secchi disk values for these lakes
(average=4.3 m), it is likely that they are significantly less productive
than those-of the Study Area. The same may be said for the ELA lakes.
RESBLTS AND-BISeUSSleN:--STRATI6RAPHle ANAlYSES GF-FOBR-lAKES
Pollen
Work completed to date suggests that an Ambrosia rise is present in the
following three lakes between the listed depths (Figure 2):
Clearwater - between 7-8 cm and 28-29 cm
Gabbro - between 7-8 cm and 29-30 cm
White Iron - between 15-16 cm and 30-31 cm
Ambrosia pollen in Birch Lake is constant at 0.6 percent at depths of 8 to
9 em and 26-27 cm. A Cesium-137 peak at 3 cm suggests a deposition rate of
0.2 em per year in Birch Lake. This suggests a rise in Ambrosia pollen
(presumably around 1900) should occur at 12-13 or 13-14 cm (Bradbury and
Megard 1972). However, the pollen does not show a rise above this level.
Birch Lake behaves very much like a river, with a flu~hing rate of 5.5
times/year. Prior to impoundment (between 1895 and 1905) the water level
was six feet lower than at present. The dam was washed out in 1952,
allowing the water to drop to its previous level, but has since been
PRELIMINARY DRAFT SUBJECT TO MAJOR REVISION DO NOT QUOTE
20
repaired. The high flushing rate and the washout may have modified the
sedimentary record" 'accounting for the anomalous pollen data.
IHatoms
eomparison of Water-and Sorface-SedimentSamples
The percentage of dominant diatom taxa in water samples was averaged to
compensate for seasonal population peaks and this average was compared with
percentages of the same taxa in surface sediment samples (Figure 4). In
this discussion the term "dominant diatoms" refers to the ten most abundant
diatoms in any sample under discussion. All species that occur in the list
of ten most abundant taxa in any of the averaged surface water samples or
surface sediment samples are listed in Figure 4. The top ten diatom
species account for between 60 and 70 percent of all frustules in the
surface sediments of all four lakes and between 80 and 97 percent of all
frustules in the water samples (Table 11). (The integrated water samples
include only planktonic forms, while sediments include benthic forms as
well.) Thus the dominant diatoms comprise the bulk of the diatom
communities.
All the dominant species in the water samples (except for Rhizosolenia in
Clearwater Lake) are among the dominant species in the surface sediment
samples, though the relative abundances vary consideraply between water
samples and surface sediment samples. Most of the dominants occur in
higher percentages in the water than in the sediment because of the benthic
forms included in the sediments. Melosira italica and M. granulata v.
PRELIMINARY DRAFT SUBJECT TO MAJOR REVISION DO NOT QUOTE
21
angustissima are exceptions to this trend and are much more abundant in the, ,
surface sediments than the water samples, probably because they are better
preserved in the sediments than other taxa. Two taxa appear particularly
under-represented in the surface sediments: Rhizosolenia spp. (especially
in Clearwater Lake), and Asterionella formosa. Rhizosolenia is well known
for its poor preservation in sediments (Tarapchak, personal communication)
and Asterionella also appears to be poorly preserved in these slightly
acidic lakes.
Despite the differences in preservation between species, 6 of 7 diatom
species characteristic of the region (Table 10) are included in the
dominant diatom species found in the cores (Figure 5). The only
characteristic diatom species found in water samples but not sediments was
Nitzschia, which was never dominant 1n water samples from the four lakes
sampled for stratigraphic analysis.
In general, sediments of the four lakes are dominated by Melosira italica,
Melosira ambigua, Tabellaria fenestrata, Melosira distans and Melosira
granulata. M. distans and T. fenestrata are considered by some authors
(Rawson 1956, Stoermer 1978, Tarapchak 1973) to indicate oligotrophic
conditions, and Melosira granulata is 'generally considered an indicator of
eutrophy. M. granulata never appeared in the water samples of the less
productive Study Area lakes. The importance ,of ~. granulata and its
varieties in Birch, Gabbro, and White Iron is consistent with the surface
PRELIMINARY DRAFT SUBJECT TO MAJOR REVISION DO NOT QUOTE, •• II..
· 22
chlorophyll data (Tables 5 and 7) and the phosphorus data (Figure 3) in
placing these lakes ,in a meso-eutrophic category. Study Area lakes appear
to be acidic as suggested by the presence at low percentages of one or more
species of Eunotia in sediments of all four lakes. Members of this genus
are acidophilic littoral forms.
Examination of figures 4 and 5 reveals that Clearwater Lake differs from
the other three lakes both in species composition and relative abundance of
certain species. The difference shows specifically in the presence in
Clearwater of Rhizosolenia and the importance of Tabe1laria fenestrata,
eyclotella glomerata, and Cyclote11a bodanica along with the absence of
Melosira granulata, Stephanodiscus astraea and Fragilaria capucina and
unimportance of Fragilaria crotonensis. Together these differences suggest
that Clearwater Lake is more oligotrophic than the others. Table 11 shows
that Clearwater Lake also has a much higher percentage of frustu1es of
littoral species among the dominant forms than do the other lakes. Since
the other lakes have a much greater shoreline development than Clearwater,
it seems likely that the higher percentage of littoral diatoms in the
sediment represents a lower planktonic production of diatoms in Clearwater.
This is consistent with the chlorophyll ~ data from water samples (Table 5)
which shows L1earwater Lake in the least productive group, and Gabbro,
White Iron, and Birch in the most productive group.
Stratigraphy
Diatom assemblages in the sediments of all four lakes are dominated by
Melosira ita1ica and Melosira ambigua to a depth of 30 cm (Figure 5). The
PRELIMINARY DRAFT SUBJECT TO MAJOR REVISION DO NOT QUOTE
, . 23
presence of Melosira granulata and its variety angustissima in both the
surface and basal sediment samples of Birch and White Iron lakes suggests
that they have always been more eutrophic than Gabbro and Clearwater lakes.
The increase of these two species of Melosira and of Fragilaria crotenensis
in the surface sediment of Gabbro lake may indicate a recent trend toward
eutrophication, but a more detailed analysis of the core would be necessary
before any conclusion could be drawn. Clearwater Lake appears oligotrophic
at all three stratigraphic levels examined.
These data are too sketchy to allow much generalization about the history
of these four lakes. However, aside from the possible indication of a
shift to enrichment in Gabbro Lake, it appears that White Iron and
Clearwater lakes have not undergone any dramatic shifts in diatom flora
since human settlement. In Birch Lake Melosira italica and Melosira
ambigua were difficult to distinguish; hence more weight should be placed
on the nearly constant percentage of Melosira granulata as an indication of
little change. In any case since no clear Ambrosia rise could be detected
in Birch Lake, the sediments may have been disturbed.
One other stratigraphic study has been done in the Study Area, on Shagawa
and Burntside lakes (Bradbury 1978). Shagawa Lake was undoubtedly
mesotrophic or eutrophic in its natural condition. Its presettlement
diatom communities were dominated by Fragilaria capucina, Melosira ambigua,
and other Melosira species, including~. granulata. All of these species
are characteristic of relatively high nutrient conditions. As cultural
1--···· -.... -I PRELIMINARY DRAFT SUBJECT TO MAJOR REVISION DO NOT QUOTEI
. L-_
·24
enrichment became progressively more severe, beginning in the late l800s,
the diatom flora became dominated first by Melosira ambigua, then by'.
Fragilaria crotonensis, and finally by Stephanodiscus hantzschii under
conditions of severe eutrophy. After 1954 when sewage treatment facilities
were improved, dominance returned to species such as Fragilaria
crotonensis, Asterionella formosa, and Melosira spp. In contrast the pre-
settlement diatom flora of Burntside lake was dominated by Tabellaria
flocculosa and eyclotella spp. Although this lake has remained largely
unaffected by human activities, significant and consistent increases in the
spring and fall maxima of Asterionella formosa have occurred since 1949.
Bradbury believes this change is related to cultural enrichment. (In this
regard, care must be taken not to confuse the occurrence of a species in a
lake with its presence as a dominant. Asterionella formosa occurs
regularly under quite oligotrophic conditions but seldom exhibits strong
population peaks in oligotrophic lakes. Indeed, this species was present
throughout the sedimentary history of Burntside lake.)
In the Study Area lakes, the most abundant diatom species in water samples
are Asterionella formosa, Fragilaria crotonensis, Melosira ambigua, and
Tabellaria fenestrata. Thus, the observations of Bradbury in Shagawa and
Burntside lakes are consistent with the idea that Study Area lakes
generally fall into mesotrophic and eutrophic categories.
SUMMARY
Surface water samples from 25 lakes 1n the Study Area showed most lakes to
be meso-eutrophic, primarily on the basis of total phosphorus
PRELIMINARY DRAFT SUBJECT TO MAJOR REVISION DO NOT QUOTE•._ 41. _
I~
I
.25
concentrations, summer chlorophyll concentrations, and phytoplankton
species composition. The presence of Melosira granulata was associated''.
with the more productive lakes. Stratigraphic analysis confirmed that
Clearwater Lake was less productive than White Iron, Birch, and Gabbro
lakes and indicated little evidence of change in these lakes since human
settlement. Clearwater, Tofte, and Burntside are examples of more
oligotrophic lakes in the Study Area.
PRELIMINARY DRAFT SUBJECT TO MAJOR REVISION DO NOT QUOTE
26
REFERENCES-CITED
APHA. 1976. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater,APHA, Washington. 1193pp.
Bradbury, J.P. 1975. Diatom stratigraphy and human settlement in Minnesota.Special Paper 171. Geological Society of America, Boulder, Colorado.74pp.
Bradbury, J.P. 1978. A paleolimnological comparison of Burntside andShagawa lakes, northeastern Minnesota. Ecological Research Series,u.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA-600/3-78-004. 50pp.
Bradbury, J.P. and R.O. Megard. 1972. Stratigraphic record of pollution inShagawa Lake, northeastern Minnesota. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull., Vol. 83:2639-2648.
Bright, R.C. 1968. Surface-water chemistry of some Minnesota lakes, withpreliminary notes on diatoms. Interim Report No.3. LimnologicalResearch Center, Univ. of Minnesota, Minneapolis. 58pp.
Crumrine, J.P. and A.M. Beeton. 1975. Limnology of lakes of the SylvaniaRecreation Area, Ottawa National Forest. Special Report No. 24.Center for Great Lakes Studies, Univ. of Wisconsin, Milwaukee. 34pp.
Eddy, S. 1963. Minnesota and the Dakotas. p. 301-315 In Frey, D.G. (ed.),Limnology ~n North America. Univ. of Wisconsin Press, Madison. 734pp.
Faegri, K. and J. Iverson. 1964. Textbook of pollen analysis. Hafner,Press, New York. 237pp.
Gerhart, D.2. and T.E. Davis. 1978. Effect of heavy metals and sulfurdioxide on phytoplankton. Final Report submitted to the RegionalCopper-Nickel Study, Minneapolis. 44pp.
Hustedt, F. 1938. Systematische and okologische Untersuchungen uber dieDiatomeen-flora von Java, Bali and Sumatra. Arch. Hydrobiol,Supplement, Band 15 and 16. p. 248.
Jarnefelt, H. 1952. Plankton als Indikator der Trophiegruppen der Seen.AnnIs. Acad. Sci. Finn., Sere A. IV BioI. 18. 29pp.
Lowe, R.L. 1974. Environmental requirements and· pollution tolerance offreshwater diatoms. Environmental Monitoring Series, U.S.Environmental Protection Agency, EPA-670/4-74-005. 333pp.
Nygaard, G. 1949. Hydrobiological studies of some Danish ponds and lakesII. BioI. Skr. 7:293.
Prescott, G.W. 1962. Algae of the western Great Lakes area. Wm. C. BrownCo., Dubuque, Iowa. 977pp.
PRELIMINARY DRAFT SUBJECT TO MAJOR REVISION DO NOT QUOTE
27
REFERENeES-CITED (contd;}
Rawson, D.S. 1956. Algal indicators of trophic lake types. Limnol.Oceanogr. 1:18-25.
Regional Copper-Nickel Study. 1977. Aquatic biology operations manual.Regional Copper-Nickel Study, Minneapolis.
Regional Copper-Nickel Study. 1978. Lake fishes. Regional Copper-NickelStudy, Minneapolis.
Schindler, D.W. 1971. A hypothesis to explain differences and similaritiesamong lakes in the Experimental Lakes Area, northwestern Ontario.J. Fish. Res. Bd. Canada 28:295-301.
Schindler, D.W. and S.~. Holmgren. 1971. Primary production and phytoplankton in the Experimental Lakes Area, northwestern Ontario, andother low-carbonate wters, and a liquid scintillation method fordetermining C-14 activity in photosynthesis. J. Fish. Res. Bd. Canada28:189-201.
Schults, D.W., K.W. Malueg, and P.D. Smith. 1976. Limnological comparisonof culturally eutrophic Shagawa Lake and adjacent oligotrophicBurntside Lake, Minnesota. American Midlnd Naturalist 96:160-178.
Stockner, J.G. 1971. Preliminary characterization of lakes in theExperimental Lakes Area, northwestern Ontario, using diatom occurrencesin sediments. J. Fish. Res. Bd. Canada 28:265-275.
Stoermer, E.F. 1978. Phytoplankton assemblages as indicators of waterquality in the Laurentian Great Lakes. Trans. Amer. Micros. Soc.97:2-16.
~rapchak, S.J. 1973. Studies on phytoplankton distribution and indicatorsof trophic state in Minnesota lakes. Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of Minnesota,Minneapolis. 161pp.
Utermohl, H. 1958. Zur Vervollkommung der Quantitativen Phytoplanktonmethodik. Mitt. Internat. Verein. Limnol. 9:1-38.
Vollenweider, R.A. 1968. Scientific fundamentals of the eutrophication oflakes and flowing waters, with particular reference to nitrogen andphosphorus as factors in eutrophication. Organization for EconomicCooperation and Development, DAS/CSI68.27, Paris. 192pp.
Vollenweider, R.A. (ed.) 1974. A manual on methods for measuring primaryproduction in aquatic environments. IBP Handbook No. 12, 2nd Ed.Blackwell, London. 225pp.
PRELIMINARY DRAFT SUBJECT TO MAJOR REVISION DO NOT QUOTE
XEROXED COpy, REGISTRATION IS NOT ACCURATE
lL~@i~IfiIIQ)
IE
LB 0 - B EAR HE ADL AK ELBG-BIG LAKELBI-BEAR ISLAND LAKELBS-BASS LAKELCT-CLOQUET LAKELCW-CLEARWATER LAKELF -FALL LAKELGD-GREENWOOD LAKELL -LONG LAKELO -LAKE ONELPH-PERCH LAKELPN-PINE LAKELSD-SAND LAKELSM-SOUTH MC DOUGALLST-SLATE LAKELTF-TOFTE LAKELTG-TRIANGLE LAKELTL-TURTLE LAKELW -WYNNE LAKELWF-WHITEFACE
RESERVOIR
L&lf"BI RC H LA K ELCY-COLBY LAKELGO-GABRO LAKELSB-SEVEN BEAVER LAKELWI-WHITE IRON LAKE
1:422.400
IlE--LTF-1/PZ/QN1 SL I SN 1761771
® PRIMARY 1976
• PRIMARY 1976 & 1977
o SURVEY 1976
• SURVEY 1976 & 1977
SL-SITE LOCATION &CLASSIFICATION
SN-SITE NAME & NUMBER
76177 -SAMPLE TYPEBY YEAR
QI-BENTHIC INVERTEBRATES,QUALITATIV
PZ-PHYTOPLANKTON AND ZOOPLANKTON.QUANTITATIVE
QN-PHYTOPLANKTON, ZOOPLANKTON ANDBENTHIC INVERTEBRATES, QUANTITATIV
QT-PHYTOPLANKTON. ZOOPLANKTON ANDBENTHIC INVERTEBRATES TRANSECT,QUANTITATIVE
DP-PHYTOPLANKTON AND BENTHICINVERTEBRATES. QUANTITATIVE
PRIMARYLAKES
SURVEYLAKES
(SECONDARY)
LCT-1/P
AQUATIC BIOLOGY LAKE STUDY SITESFIGURE 1.
'-----,FIGURE 2.Stratigraphic position of samples analyzed. Arrows represent samples analyzed for diatoms.:esium-137 generally peaks in 1963.
N\0
(Pci/Gl
WHITE IRON
0.94
.~
AMBROSIA I 131 CS
~
GABBRO
5%
I AMBROSIA 1137 CS
CLEARWATER
2 4 6 8 10 I 5
-..1.0 Ei
• • q"
137 CS (PCI/G) I AMBROSIA I 137 CS
BIRCH
0.62 ~ C / /" /" /I
0.6611~
~OCATION OF DIATOM SAMPLES I emm::::i:::iii3 % AMBROSIA POLLEN I V????? Cs- 1371N (PCI/G)1 1111 1 I I I I I I 1 1111 1 I I I I I I j i I I I IIIII1 I I I I I I I ill I I I I I I Io
12345678
~ 9() 10
J: 11t- 12a. 13wo 14t- 15z 16w~ 17Q 18LU 19(n 20
2122232425
"262728293031
":0mrs:z·»:0-<o:0 1»;.".......
(J)
cCD
fC~m
o....... '
.......'0I~,»
C-
O:0;
:0m<enozoozo.......
oco-Im
30
Figure 3. Classification of study lakes based on total phosphorusconcentration. (after Vollenweider, 1968)
,t,
100
Total phosphorus, average values,tsummer samples, 1976 & 1977. t(1-3 samples per station) t
o 10 30: i :: Oligomeso-: Mesoeutrophic : Eutrophic.. . .
: trophic :. if'
jjjjji :
:::::~
1[1::~Mj~.;.:.; I
i;!(~r.~~
1I~=~: I
Bass
Triangle
Bear Island
IBearhead
Long
ILakes
lTofte
Turtle
Colby
WYnne
-White Iron
IGabbro
iPine
Big
iBirch
iFall
Perch
iWhitefaceiISandI
IGreenwood
lOne
!Cloquet
IS. McDougal
ISeven Beaver
ISlate
I Clearwater
o
31
WHITE IRON
LAKEC!:J . L· .1. c. -.
BIRCH
LAKE1
!;~~~~
I~~1
I'i~ ~
; i@ ~jI
~.!.:.r.~.; :..::.;..;i.i:_..;~.·i.;;:.0 !.;r:~.;~;~...~.;~ .. 9.~ 3-.~..:.i~...:.· .::::. ~.-. ..: 2 .;-::. .:t;~
I ;:::i' .;i...::.~.:..i:....!:.;l..:l.. :): ;]iIi i[~ji~ :t:
* ......•·.:;';;:,l:;,:..:1::1.. 9. 9 ~ ;~j ~;~ ..:......f.:..:~....:~:....:~..::t.....:::I II m ii I I11809 1ii.&iW:i.ii.i.iMi~ 1::.
6
003 1.0 I !; .:...~..~...:~:~::.: ".' :t.~l~ IT,. m ~ ~~:::.;~;;;;;I , l 1.0 I di:+.---"-r-1--r-~"T-r""""'----r-T..,..,-I-r--r--r-r--- -T"""T""-r-r~'---r-~-r-T'--~...,..-r-+--r-r.,.-,.-
t 1 20 010 20 1
PERCENT OF TOTAL DIATOMS
Inmmml-sURFACE WATER SAMPLE~ -SURFACE SEDIMENT SAMPLE
... CLEARWATER GABBRO
LAKE LAKEDIATOMS
Asterionella formosa
Melosira granulata
Melosira ambigua
Rhizosolenia spp.
Melosira italica
Fragilaria crotonensis
Tabellaria fenestrata
Cyclotella glomerata
Fragilaria capucina
FragiIariaconstruens v. venter
Melosira ~ranulatav. angust1.ssima
Cyclotella bodanica(including ~. comta)
~elosira dis tans
Stephanodiscus nia arae(including~. astraea
Figure 4 Comparison of Surface Sediment Samples with Average Composition ofWater Samples, Based on Percent of all Frustules Belonging to DominantTaxa. Missing Columns Mean the Taxon is Absent.
PRELIMINARY DRAFT SUBJECT TO MAJOR REVISION DO NOT QUOTE
32
, Figure 5. Stratigraphy of Selected Dominant Diatom Taxa in Four Study Lakes
15 - 16 em
28 - 29 em
------1GABBRO
1 - 2 em
29 - 30 em
j------BIRCH2 - 3 em
I 27 - 28 emI
:------I
!WHITEIRON1 - 2 em
15 - 16 em
I 30 - 31 em
<
>
?
<
>
<
>
>
<
r- ....j
o a 16 24 32 0 8 16 24 0 8 0 8 0 8 0 8 0 8 0 8 0 8 0 8 160 8 160 8
PERCENT OF TOTAL DIATOMS
PRELIMINARY DRAFT SUBJECT TO MAJOR REVISION DO NOT QUOTE
33
Table 1. Frequency of collection of phytoplankton samples.
YEAR: 1916 1911Lake MONTH: May June/July Aug. Sept. Oct. April July Oct.
Pri.ma:rY::Birch X X X X X X X X
Seven Beaver X X X X X X
rlhite Iron X X X X X X X X
Colby X X X X X X X X
Gabbro X X X X X
Survey:
Pine X X X X X
Bass X X X X X
Bearhead X X X X
Perch X X X X
Sand X X X X X
Greenwood X X X X
Tofte X X X X X
Turtle X X X X X
Wynne X X X X X
Bear Island X X X X X
Fall X X
Long X
Big X X
Slate X X
So. l·!cDougal X X
One X X
Cloquet X X
Triangle X X
Whiteface X
Clearwater X X
PRELIMINARY DRAFT SUBJECT TO MAJOR REVISION DO NOT QUOTE
"
"""..f:'. . .- .-0:0 Table 2. Physical and chemical characteristics of lakes sampled biologically and reasons for sampling.mr- POTENTIAL FOR~ TSlb- SURFACE DEPTH CU-NI I}U'ACTSZ LAKE WATERSHED AREA-Km2 (m) pHs COLORs ALl<ALINITY8 CONDUCTIVITYs (P) DIRECTc INDIRECTd REASO~ FOR SAMPLtNGe
»:0 Birch Birch
I 25.62 4.15 7.1 54.9 23.4 68.6 49 high high 1
-< Colby Partridge 2.24 3.13 7.1 133.75 33.0 152.65 51G..1bbro Isabella 3.63
,3.66 7.25 100.25 17.75 48.25 48 low low 2, 10
CJ Seven:0 Beaver St. Louis • 5.63 1.46 6.5 172.5 13.67 47.75 54 rned med I, 3» \-,111 te Iron Kawishlvi 13.85 6.00 6.95 73.75 17.15 51.25 49 high med 1
" Bass R.1nge .68 5.51 8.15 6.5 32.0 79.5 47 low low 3-I Bearhead Vermilion 2.74 4.49 7.85 26.0 23.5 68.0 40 low low 3, 9(J) BeLIr
C Is13nd Be<1t." Island 8.64 8.74 7.4 39.5 15.5 44.25 47 low low 3
OJBig Partridge 3.21 -- 7.6 14.0 25.0 62.0 61 med med 3, 4, 7
C- Clearwater Ka\Jishiv1 2.61 7.44 6.7 2.0 16.0 39.0 54 low low 4, 7
m Cloquet Cloquet 0.74 .85 7.2 90.0 21.0 54.0 55 low low 3
0 Fall Fall 8.93 3.99 6.7 45.0 16.0 43.0 51 med low 3, S
-I . Green....ood Stony 5.06 1. 27 6.65· 170.0 8.0 50.0 60 low med 3Long St. Louis 1. 79 .50 7.1 30.0 14.0 46.0 46 low med 4, 7
-I One Ka .... ishiwi 3.55 3.14 6.7 27.0 15.0 27.0 52 low low 3, 40 Perch Bear Island 0.44 2.30 6.5 82.5 7.5 28.5 51 low low 4, 7
~Pine St. Louis 1.77 2.34 7.8 102.5 18.0 59.5 52 low med 4, 7Snnd Stony 2.05 1. 45 7.25 80.0 21.5 63.5 60 low med 3» :Slate Stony 0.93 1. 51 6.8 180.0 21.0 51.0 -- low med 4
C-o South
0 . HcDougal . Stony 1.12 .51 6.7 260.0 11. 0 36.0 55 low med 4:0 Tofte l-toose Lake 0.47 10.73 8.55 3.0 70.5 147.5 38 low low 4, 9. 10:0 Tri;lng1e Mooge Lake 1. 32 3.99 7.7 2.0 34.0 65.0 46 low low 9
m Turtle Isabells 1.36 1.13 6.85 30.0 8.5 26.0 50 low low 4, 9
< ! \o,'hi teface- 1 Res. Whiteface 17.22 3.15 7.05 137.5 19.75 57.5 low loW' 1, 3, SI(j) 'Wynne Embarrass -- 11. 1 7.2 110.0 42.5 139.0 43 low low 3-0Z
00Z0-I
0C0-4m
35
Table 2 (contd.)
aSunnnertime averages, {June, July, and August data} from Water QualityPrograms.
bTSI (P) = Carlson's Trophic State Index based on median total phosphorusconcentrations.
CPotential direct impact: Lake may receive effluents either directly frommining operation or tailings basin, or receives water from a directlyimpacted watershed.
dPotential indirect impact: Lake may receive impacted water "second hand,"or is in area likely to receive air-borne contaminates.
e l .2.3.4.
5.6.7.8.9.
10.
Likely to be impacted by copper-nickel developmentNot likely to be impacted ("control")Represents a particular watershedChosen because of a prevailing soil type and/or percent predominantslopeReceives water from large watershedReceives water from small watershedNo inletNo outletNeither inlet nor outletChosen because of greater maximum depth
PRELIMINARY DRAFT SUBJECT TO MAJOR REVISION DO NOT QUOTE
~+Ao Ao Max. Color Seechi Condo Total Total Total. N06-N + DissolvedLake V Depth (Pt-Co Disk pH (pnili0s/ AlkDlinity Hardness TOC p 1: 7-N NH4-N S04 Silica
(rel. ) (kn2) (m) unit::» (m) em) (mr.-II CDC01) (m'"r/]J ~~Lll_ J!:;!l) (m:>: 1) (mf"ll ) (n f7j]J (n,,:/l)
Tofte 0.4 0.47 22 J 5.3 8.6 1h8 71 31 6 9 0.009 0.01 8.4 0.8
Clearwater 0.6 2.61 14 2 4.0 6.7 39--16--- 24 7 50* 0.050 0.03 4.0 0.5
-- --- --- ------~
~ar Island 1.2 8.64 22 40 2.9 7.4 45 16 12 18 0.027 0.04 6.2 3.6---- --- -Dear~lcad L3 2.74 14 26 1.B 7.9 68 24 31 11 17 0.030 0.03 8.9 5.8
-- - ----'l'ri arl61e 1.3 1.32 12 2 3.8 7.7 65 34 81 7 20 0.010 0.03 4.3 0.4
- _._--_ .. -- ---- -Big 2.5 3.21 5 14 3.0 7.6 62 25 22 11 30 0.010 0.01 8.1 2.7---- f------- ------ -Perch 3.6 O.W~ 9 83 1.3 6.5 29 8 12 16 33 0.017 0.01 4.2 1.9B3.SS 3.6 0.68 11 7 5.0 8.2 80 32 41 6 20 0.010 0.02 11.0 3.4Fine 4.0 1. 77 4 103 L4 7.8 60 18. 25 29 29 0.050 0.01 7.8 1.6
5.0---
L8'I'urtle 1.36 3' 30 6.9 26 9 11 13 22 0.010 0.01 3.1 1.0
I.:-.ite face 6.5 17.22 9 138 1.0 7.1 58 20 42 30 33 0.089 0.09 9.1 6.2--Cloquet 10.4 0.74 2 90 - 7.2 54 2l 32 22 40 0.020 0.02 11.0 8.7.3a.'1d 111.4 2.05 12 80 1.4 7.3 64 22 - 28 37 0.009 0.01 8.0 6.0
Grccnuood 17.2 5.06 2 170 1.1 6.7 50 8 - 31 38 0.024 0.01 9.8 2.5
One 19.3 3.55 11 21 2.4 6.7 21 15 10 11 40 0.010 0.04 4.2 3.9
Scyen Beaver 19.6 5.63 2 168 0.0 6.5 49 13 23 28 43 0.042 0.06 5.4 1.6- - ----- -
Birch 23.6 25.62 8 55 1.9 7.1 69 23 37 14 30 0.073 0.10 8.9 4.9
L0~ 26.0 1. 79 2 30 2.6 7.1 46 14 18 14 11 0.008 - - 1.6
·.·.'jnne 29.4 1.15 16 110 1.9 7.2 139 43 - 25 24 0.130 0.02 29.0 8.6-
Ku. te Iron 32.6 13.85 15 72 1.1 7.0 52 11 22 14 26 0.031 0.10 8.6 5.2Colby 47.7 2.24 11 136 2.4 7.1 153 33 60 22 23 0.022 0.09 29.8 . 6.5---- I-
So. l'~cDougal 67.6 1.12 2 260 0.9 6.7 36 11 17 23 40 0.010 - 6.0 5.2~_. ---
Gabbro 78.2 3.63 15 100 1.4 7.3 48 18 25 15 27 0.037 0.05 4.3 7.3
45 1.8- -- -
0.06Fall 106.4 8.93 10 6.7 43 16 24 13 30 0.030 5.4 4.5----Slate 322.8 0.96 3 180 - 6.8 51 21 22 27 5CJl~ 0.060 0.02 5.6 5.8
"'0':0mr-s:Z~
:0-<o:0:t>-n--IencOJC-m(')--I--Io~»C-
O:0
:0m<enozoozo--I
oCo-Im'
* contaminated?
table 3 .. Physical and chemical charaoteristics ot stu~ area lakes. Lakes are arranged in orderor increasing values tor. Schindler's (1971) ratio Ad +Ao/V. (Ad.. area or terrcstri:llportion of lake's drainage; Ao • surface area ot la.1{e; V • volume of lake.) Water chem1strrvalues are averages for summertime samples, 1976 and 1977. For survey lakes only one ortloJO measurements were made.
W0\
37
Table 4. Lake groups based on total organic carbon and color'." (TOO values are mg/l; color values are Pt-Co units.)
Toe = 6 - 1 TOO = 11 - 16 TCC = 22 - 31
Color = 2 - 7 Color = 14 - 100 Color = 80 - 260
Tofte One Colby
Bass Bearhead Cloquet
Cleanm.ter Big So. l-lcDougal
Triangle Bear Island Wynne
Turtle Slate
Fall Seven Beaver
vlhite Iron Sand
Long Pine
Birch Whiteface
Gabbro Greenwood
Perch
PRELIMINARY DRAFT SUBJECT TO MAJOR REVISION DO NOT QUOTE
38
'.Table , •. -Lake groups based on surmnertime measurements o:f
chlorophyll a. (No data are available for'Whiteface Reservoir.)
Max. Chlorophyll ~ (pg/l)
0-4 I 5 - 10 II - 20
Tofte Bear Island Green~vood
Clearwater Bearhead Seven Beaver
Bass Triangle Birch
Big H~nite Iron
Pine Colby
Turtle Gabbro
Cloquet Slate
Sand Perch
One
Long
\-lynne
So. McDougal
Fall
PRELIMINARY DRAFT SUBJECT TO MAJOR REVISION DO NOT QUOTE
"JJmr-~
z»:0-<o:0 1».-n-IC/)
Ctoe-mo-I-Io~»c...o:0'
:0m<(j)
ozoozo-I
oCo-Im
Table 6. Thermal stratification of study' area lakes, 1976.
June-July August
Strong Weak None Strong Weak None
White Iron Seven Beaver Colby \-lhite Iron Gabbro(Sta. 1) Gabbro
(Sta. 1) BirchPrimary Colby vJhite Iron White IronLakes (Sta. 2) (Sta. 2)
Birch Seven Beaver
One Fall Clearwater
Bass Big Cloquet
Tofte Bearhead Pine
Survey Triangle Perch Long No DataLakes Wynne Whiteface Slate
Bear Island Reservoir So. McDougal
Sand
Greenwood
Turtle
W\0
40
Table 7. Chlorophyll 2; concentrations (P.g/1) in primary 1ake&, 1976.
Lake Station Hay June August September October
~"." 1 5.6 6.0 10.5 12.0 -Birch 2 5.3 6.5 14.0 11.4 il.O
3 6.0 7.6 14.0 10.9 12.5
4 7.4 8.0 11.1 11.4 14.7
White Iron 1 4.9 4.4 11.4 13.4 13.62 4.9 6.7 12.9 15.4 7.1
Gabbro 1 6.2 8.7 10.4 li.1 10.0
2 4.0 8.0 14.4 15.3 6.5
Seven Beaver 1 9.6 12.0 12.3 - -2 8.5 8.5 11.8 - -
Colby 1 4.9 3.3 li.1 li.l 7.32 3.3 4.4 12.9 12.3 5.3
PRELIMINARY DRAFT SUBJECT TO MAJOR REVISION DO NOT QUOTE
41
Table 8. Dominance for algal groups in summer samples from study lakes •.Data for p!imary lakes during 1976 are from August samples.
Number of Lakes Showing Dominance byAlgal Group Each Algal Group*
1976 1977
Cyanophyta 9 5
Chrysophyta 7 5
Cabillariophyta 7 2
Chlorophyta 1 2- -
Total number oflakes sampled 24 14
*Dominance is based on total unit concentrations, not cellconcentrations, for each group in each sample.
PRELIMINARY DRAFT SUBJECT TO MAJOR REVISION DO NOT QUOTE
42
Table 9. Phytoplan.l(ton species diversity (number of species observed) in studylakes, StU:lITlcr sallples, 1976 and 1977. Data for primary'lakes during1976 are from August samples. No summer samples ~rere collected for~fuiteface Reservoir.
Number of SpeciesLake Bacillario- Chloro- Cyano- Chryso- Crypto- P";rrho- Eugleno-
phyta phyta phyta phyta phyta phyta phytaTotal
Pri.r.1ar"/:
Bi~h '76 31 32 21 7 1 2 3 91'71 16 8 9 5 1 3 1 43
Seven Beaver 176 45 37 19 6 1 1 5 114'77 22 22 11 4 1 1 0 61
~lhite Iron 176 26 19 18 6 2 1 0 72'77 10 6 6 7 0 1 0 30
Colby '76 28 12 10 6 2 3 0 61'77 28 9 5 4 1 1 1 49
Gabbro '76 27 16 16 6 2 2 2 71
Survey:
Pine 176 26 11 5 7 1 3 1 54'71 12 14 4 6 0 3 1 40
Bass 176 11 10 9 4 1 1 0 36'17 12 9 8 0 1 1 1 32
Bearhead 176 15 12 3 1 2 5 0 44'71 11 13 7 4 1 2 1 39
Perch 176 18 11 1 1 1 3 2 43177 0 7 2 3 0 0 0 12
Sand '76 29 9 4 7 2 4 0 55'71 10 7 2 3 1 1 0 24
Gre~t;009. '76 11 16 5 4 1 1 2 40'71 18 13 5 6 0 0 1 43
Tofte '76 12 1 4 3 1 0 0 21'71 12 9 1 1 1 0 0 30
Turtle '76 22 16 8 2 1 6 1 56177 24 16 12 4 0 4 0 60
\<f.ynne 176 19 7 5 4 3 1 0 39'77 3 3 1 1 0 0 0 8
Bear Island '76 19 13 12 4 2 2 2 54'77 12 19 7 4 1 0 2 45
Fall '76 22 15 6 7 2 2 0 54Long '76 44 12 4 7 1 2 0 70Big '76 20 24 14 4 J 3 1 69Slate '76 50 7 2 2 J 2 1 67So. McDougaJ. '76 46 11 5 3 2 1 2 70One '76 16 11 8 11 1 3 0 50Cloquet 176 33 25 12 4 3 4 2 83Triangle '76 14 6 9 4 1 3 0 37
I Clenrwater 176 11 14 9 6 1 2 0 43
Note: Where samples were collected at several stations in a lake, these ~re pooled.Apparent differences in species diversity betvreen 1976 and 1977 in primary lakesare artIfacts since they result from Doolinr; different m.unbc-rs of samples.
PRELIMINARY DRAFT SUBJECT TO MAJOR REVISION DO NOT QUOTE
43
Table 10. Characteristic phytoplankton algae of study lakes. Alga€ included in thetable are those which were present in more than two-thirds of the lakesduring at lea::3t tr~ sampling seasons and ..mch 'trere present as dominantson at least one occasion. For the Bacillariophyta, Chlorophyta, Cyanophyta,and ChrJsophyta dominant species are defined as the 5 most abundant speciesin each group in a given sample. For the CT"jptophyta and Pyrrhophytadominant species are defined as the 2 most abundant species. The number o£units (not cells) of a species was taken as the measure of its abundance.
Percent of Lakes in which Species was Dominant or Present
Species Summer 1976 Summer 1977 Fall 1976 Fall 1977(24 lakes sampled) (15 lakes sampled) (23 la~es sampled) (12 lakes sampled)
Dominant Present Dominant Present Dominant Present Dominant Present:
Bacillariophyta
Asterionella formosai 75 96 53 80 96 J.OO 83 92Cyclotella bodanica 33 75 13 60 13 78 0 17Fragilaria crotonensis 71 96 67 93 48 87 33 61Melosira a~bigua 29 19 21 53 74 91 58 83Helosira dista'1s 50 1J. 27 61 39 70 8 25Nitzschia sp. 46 88 21 67 17 87 33 58Tabellaria fenestrata/ 61 96 41 100 61 83 75 J.OO
Chlorophyta
Ankistrodesmu.s falcatus \/including varieties 75 96 40 81 61 9J. 50 75acicularis u mirabilis
Botryococcus Braunii 2J. 88 " 27 40 4 87 8 8/
Oocysti 5 sp. 54 88 20 81 43 87 8 42
Cyanophyta
Agmenellum ouadruDli-catum (= l'~eris:noDedia 71 19 61 81 43 70 17 J.1glauca)
Aphanocaosa delicatissimaJ 88 92 60 80 78 83 58 67Coelosohaeriun Kuetzing- 50 88 20 27 43 91 8 17ianum
Chrysophyta
Dinobryon bavaricum 92 92 60 73 70 87 33 33Dinob~{on diveT2ens 75 75 60· 60 70 87 50 58Dinobryon sertularia var. 58 71 60 67 30 65 17' 25protuberans
Cryptophyta
CryptoITlonas ~./ 79 8) 60* 67* 74 78 92 92
Pyrrhophyta
Ceratiurn hirundinella 50 88 7 47 17 74 8 8
*Cryptomonas spp.
PRELIMINARY-D~AFTSUBJECT TO MAJOR REVISION DO NOT QUOTEL-- ._ .. .#<. •• •. .,.. ~
r-----1
I :\!1
Table 11. Proportion of Diatoms in Surface Water Phytoplankton and Proportion of Dominantswithin Diatom Samples. ~
~
--0':xJm'r--~
z»::0-<o::0 1
»'-n-ICJ)
COJ
,C-
~ m()-I-I
'0~»c-O::0 1
:0m<CJ)
ozoozo-I
oCo-I
~ m'
Diatoms as percentage of totalphytoplankton cells in surfacewater samples t July or Augustand October t 1976.
Percentage of frustulescontributed by top 10 diatoms
- in surface watersamples
- in surface sedimentsamples
Clearwater
6.4%
81%
69%
Gabbro
7.6%
89%
63%
Birch
13.0%
98%
68%
White Iron
11.4%
84%
62%
45
Table 12. Summary of percentages of planktonic and benthic speciescontributed by the top 10 diatoms in surface sediment samples.
Planktonicdominants
Benthic~ ···:·dominants
Total percentcontributed bytop 10 diatoms
CLEARWATER
44.1%
24.9%
69.1%
GABBRO
49.9%
13.1%
63.0% .
BIRCH
62.0%
6.3%
68.3
WHITE IRON
53.4%
8.8%
62.2%
..- ....1-- PR~~IM;NARY-D;AFTSUBJECT TO MAJOR REVISION DO NOT QUOTEIL-~--_._. . ._-
46
Appendix A
Tables 1 through 20 summarize the abundance of 'dominant' taxa in ea'ch
of the algal divisions in lakes sampled for the Regional Study in summer
and fall, 1976 and 1977. Dominants are defined as the five most abundant
taxa in each of the group Bacillariophyta, Chlorophyta, Cyanophyta, and
.....~~rysophyta, and the two most abundant taxa in Cryptaphyta and Pyrrhophyta.
Taxa are included in the tables if they appeared as dominant in any of the
lakes in the sample period tabulated. The abundance of dominant taxa is
given in units/mI.
Counting units utilized were:
Unicells - each cell
Diatoms - each complete frustule (2 valves)
Filaments - 100 microns length
Discrete colonies - each 4,8,16,32, or 64cell colony
Indiscrete colonies - every 8 cells
Dense colonies - every 50 cells
Cells per counting 'unit' were recorded for discrete and indiscrete colonies.
Examples of discrete colonial forms include Pandorina, Volvox, and Oocystis.
Indiscrete colonial forms include Agmenellum (Merismopedia), Chroococcus and
Crucigenia. Examples of dense colonies are Microcystis, Aphanothece, and
other cocoid blue-greens.
For taxa present but not dominant in a lake on that date, the entry is a P.
For 1976, when 2 samples were analyzed from more than one station per lake
for many lakes, the numbers given are averages of all samples collected and
analyzed from that lake, that date.
TOTALS GIVEN ARE TOTAL UNITS FOR THE GROUP, INCLUDING ALL TAXA, NOT JUST INTHE TABLE.
f-' ....j
PRELIMINARY-D~AFT SUBJECT TO MAJOR REVISION DO NOT QUOTEI
. L-__----
4T
Samples were collected with a 4 meter integrated sampler tube during
the time intervals shown below:
All Lakes
Sample Period
Summer, 1976
October, 1976
Primary Lakes ('76)
June 15 - June 24
October 5 - October 14
Survey Lakes ('76)
July 7 - July 15
October 18 - October 25
Summer, 1977
October, 1977
July 6 - July 12
October 12 - October 14
l~··· ~R~L1M;NARY-D~AFT SUBJECT TO MAJOR REVISION DO NOT QUOTE...../A _ ~ - ~......... ~.,. ~
'wIo::::>aIoZ
oozoen
I>'.w~cc"'-,f; CC~o,:J ..,
~<t:'2~
tr.I C
~ ~ 0 .~8 ....>'0.0 '0 ....
0,W ;..,co::::>en....u.<t:CCo>CC<t:Z
~--J,w
a:a.
U'l '0 11le <ll ..0.-1<114.1 0...0ctl e e
..... ctl :JQtr.lZ
.. \4.<\4) 0,...0\ OJ...... u_ C
ctl .. ctl4.1 >. "'0>,..-1 C.c :J ;:lQ...., .0o ctl
..... 1-11-1 0 4.1ctl s::
..... CJ CJ
.-I s:: III
..... ;:l ~
(J ..., 1-1ctl P.
a::l C ¢J- ..... '"'
.......~io4
.-
ctl4.JI1l
'"'I1l 4.J'r4 til ,.J'"' CJ -(ctl s:: t-o
.-i <ll 0
..-I4-l t-oOJ
.0ctl
ctl'"' Q.-0 III<llF
J.....tiltfI.....4.JI1l(J
'r4ctl .....
'"' <ll'0'0CJ
~
Ul:J(J
v: ctl..... III'0 I1la ""c 4.1ctl tfI.t: ctlQ.<ll
ctlctl 4.J
..... CJc:: tfIQJ .r4
..... tJ)
o Ctil 00 .....N....
I1l Ul..........s:: UlCJ C
..., OJa 'r4til '"'a QJN
'r4.t:
I1lctl 'r4
'r4 '"'Po .c: ctl(J Q. ..... Q.
III III III ;:l IIIN s::4.1 s::
I1l..... tilctl <ll
.c: -0Q. 'r4OJ a(J .....o ctl .....4.1 ..... QJ
ctl Q. ctl;:l ctl 4.1 ctl..... >- ..... Q. ...... ;:l .....;:l '"' ;:l;:l ;:l (J ;:l(J (J (J f30 (J III (J
.r4 ..... 'r4 .r4
~ ~. ~ ~
ctl(J.....
ctl .....1-1 ctl
..... 4.1III .....a.....QJ
ctl4.Jctl
M;:l
ctl s::'"' ctl'r4 1-1III eoa.....OJ
Uls::ctl
ctl 4.J1-1 Ul..........Ul'Oa
M
ctl:J00
ctl 'r41-1..0..... eUl ctla.....
Ul.r4ms::Q)
ctl C..... a'"' 4.Jctl aM 1-1..... (J
00ctl1-1
Uls::Q);:l
ctl 1-1..... 4.J1-1 enctl s::
M 0..... (J00ctl
'"'
ctls::
ctl .....'r4 (J1-1 ;:lctl Q.
..... ctl..... (J
00ctl
tfI.....~o
4-l'r4.....;:l(J
ctl 'r4..... >..... ctlQJ s::
!
ctlctl ctl '"'..... ctl (J ~
en ..-I en ctl 'r4 ctl OJ~ ~ 0 ..... s:: ..... 'r4
.t: g e ..-I ctl ..... ..-14.1 <11-0 ~..-I
s:: f30 .... 0 4.1 0 4.1 ~
ctl II) ,",4-1 0.0 04.1s:: <ll ..... ..-1 m
.t: 4.1 (J (J~ U IIJ '" '" G ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ :i: l2: Z Z Z Z p,; ~ ~ Vi til· til' ~< < u u-_... _-
Greenwood - 218 - - - - - 42 P 26 - - - - - - 42 - P - - - - 48 413Colby 3 7 - - - - - P P P P P - P - P P P P - P - 2.0 3.0 33Bass - P 19 - 4 - - 276 21 - - - - - - - 2 - - - - - - - 330Bear Island P 4 12 P - - - P P P P 9 - - - - 4 P P - -' - - 12 73
Birch P 27 P P - - - P - 46 100 - - P - P P - P P 26 - P 18 501
Bearhead - - P 4 - - - 4 9 - - - - - - P 10 - - - - - P 4 50
Seven Beaver - 153 P P P - - 173 P P 166 - P P - 58 P P - - P - P 230 1054Pine - 53 11 P P - - p p - - P P - - - 27 - 32 - - - - 11 171Perch - 76 P P P - - p P 21 - - - - - - 13 - 60 100 - - - P 434
Tofte - 5 - - - - - 106 - - - - - 5 5 P P - - - - - - P 136Sand - P P P - - - 82 21 107 P P P - - - 56 P 33 P - - - P 431Wynne P P - P P - - 5 - P P P 5 - - 3 5 - - 5 - - - P 37White Iron P 74 P P P 7 P 51 45 P P P P P P P P 22 250 -- - - - - PTurtle P 9 12 - P - - 4 P - - - - P - - 5 P P - - - - 142 193Gabbro P 175 P P - - - 58 P 400 215 - - P - P P P P p p - P 85 1102Triangle - 79 3 - - - - 76 P - - - - p - - P - 18 P - - - 24 224Fall p p p - - - - 147 55 P 281 P P P - - P - 52 - - - - 139 912Long - 244 - P - ~ - 63 63 P 39 - P P - P 34 p P P - - p p 719One P 42 21 P - - - - P 42 - P - - - - - - 26 90 - - P P 348
Cloquet P 8 - - - - - 8 76 P - - P P - P 34 10 - - - - - P 227Clearwater P 2 12 - - - - p - - - - - 4 - p - - 47 - - - P 65 136S. McDougal - 45 P p P P - 34 P 26 - P P - - p 3 p - - - - - 37 261Slate p p p p - 16 38 P 52 10 - P - P - P P P - - - - - 10 142
Big - 77 49 P - - - 146 - 58 - - - - - - p - p - p - p 140 523
-,
OJ~
I'.1
I
i
:_J\.
49
istrodesmusalcatus
istrodesmusalcatus. acicularisistrodesmusalcatus• mirabilisistrodesmuspirales
hrodesmusalfsii
hrodesmusriangularis
ryococcusraunii
amydomonusp.
bus inarebissonii
ucleariap.
p.marium
cigenapiculata
cigeniarregularis
cigeniap •
cigeniaetrapedia
cigeniaruncata
cigeniauadrata
tyosphaeriumulchellum
oystisigas
ocystisp.
enkiniaadiata
chneriellaontorta
ractiniumusillum
ystisp.
iastrumetras
AXA
Cd en~ n n 0 I:"" "11 ~ C') ~
~~ en ~ "'d ." en tld tld t;Ill l:J:l n C') I:"".... ... ~ ~ ~ 0 I» "'1 I» c: '< I» 0 ~ .... ~ (1) .... ~ I» 0 "'1 I»
OQ Dl ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ .... cr "'1 ~ ~ ~ '"" "'1 ~ <: I» "'1 III (/) ~ ~ ~
'" :x I» .tJ OQ ~ III cr '" '" ~ Q. '" (') ~ (1) "'1 (') "'1 (/) a' ~ (1)
C' (') ( c: :J "'1 ~ (1) (1) (1) ::7' ~ ::7' ::7' '< ~ (/)
0 (1) OQ 0 (1) (1) 1-1 C0 I» '" ... H tld PI III 0c: '" C' P1 C' C. ... 0
OQ ~ 0 ~PI C.., P1 ;S ~... ftl C....
T
- - - - Ank"'d I I N ." ." "'d ." 00 "'d N I "'d ." I I.W ." ." 00 V1 ." ." ~ ."f
V1 - N ~ N - N I.W - - Ank"'d 00 "'d '" I '" ." \0 V1 0 I '" w - I w N - ." I 00 I ." ." f
var
I "'d I I I I N N I I I w I I I ." I ." ." ." I ." Ank\0 ..- V1 \0 N f
":'IT
I "'d ." ." I I I 1 I I 1 1 I 1 N 1 I 1 I I 1 I I I Ank- 5
I , ." I I I ." 1 ." I I ." I 1 I 1 I ." ~ 1 1 I ." I Artr
, I I ..... I I -I I I I I I 1 I 1 1 1 ." 1 I I I 1 1 Artt
I I I 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 I w I I I I I I 1 1 Barnb- -N - w I N I ." I 1 I ." I I 1 I ." - I I I I I I V1 Bin..- ~ N ..- - \0S-00 I V1 ." ." ." ." ." 00 "'d - "'d "'d I "'d W "'d "'d "'d I V1 "'d I "'d Botb
1 I 1 I I "'d I "'d I I 1 1 I I 1 I I ." I I I I I ." ChIs
00 I 1 ." ." ." I ." ." "'d ." ." I ." ." V1 I ." "'d ." "'d ." I "'d CosS
00 ." "'dN Cru
I ..... 1 I I I "'d "'d I I I I I I ." I I I I I ~
a
I I I I "'d I I 1 I I I I 1 1 I I 1 I I I I w I I CruV1
i
I I 1 1 1 I I I I I I "'d 1 1 I I 1 1 I ." I I w I Crus
." I 00 N "'d - "'d."'d "'d I ..., I I "'d "'d I I "'d 1 I ..... Cru~ 00 - ..... 00 0 ~
t
I I "'d I I I I 1 1 N I ." I 1 1 "'d I "'d 1 I I I I I Cru0
t
N I "'d I V1 "'d 1 N 1 I "'d 1 I "'d I I "'d I I I I I 1 "'d Cru'" 0 ..-
q
I , 1 1 1 1 I 1 I "'d I 1 I 1 I I I "'d 1 "'d 1 "'d "'d I DicP
I I I 1 1 1 '" ..- Gle1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 I I N I "'d I I 0 I
g
I , 1 I "'d I I I I I I 1 1 1 I I 1 1 I I I w 1 I Gle0
s
I I , 1 "'d I I 1 I I I 1 I 1 I I ..- I I "'d 1 1 I I Gol'" r
." I I I "'d I 00 I 1 I I 1 I I I 1 I 1 1 I I I I 1 Kirc, , I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I "'d 1 I 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 I MicP- - N "'d "'d "'d - ." "'d V1 V1 "'d I I ~ "'d N N I "'d w Ooc
'" V1 0' W 00 V1 00 0 0 w .....5
, , ~ PedI 1 I 1 I 1 I w 1 "'d I I 1 , I ." 1 ." I I "'d 1t
Table 2. ChlorophytaSampled in June or July, 1976, by RCNSNumbers represent abundance of dominants in units/mI •
... ...
wr-
°:Jaroz
°oz
.0.... -~enqI -.:: >§ wc: 0:.....
0:o...,«,~
or-....ow .....,~
co:Jen....LL«0:o>0:«z~
~4.1C
tI.l t'Il
:z cu .....c:r:: e
o>'"d
.0 .....~ 0
\0,...., QJC\ C).... c
.. eo>'"0.... c::=' ::l...,.0
co
...JW0:C.
~
o 4.1c::
Q) Q)c:: II)::l Q)
..., ~
ceo c:: Q)4J ..... ~
>...c::"t:llllo.aJ~0 .... aJI:: 0..0co e e>. co ='UtI.lZ
MQI....
.A
~
eo eoII) 4.10.(1)eo-.-4C)..c::o tJI:: eo ..-iCil..-i Cil
CilE
-.-4II)
E II):::l '.-4
'.-4 4.1"0 IJJ•.-4 I::e bOj., I::
'.-4-.-4e
'.-4W
Cil..c::>'aJ.obObOCilI::
e:::l E
•.-4 ::l Cilj., I:: .....W Cil ..c::Cil '.-4 C)
..e..-i .....o..aJ j.,II) eo 4.1o W 0
..-i Cil aJ 0.
eE :::l:::l I::
-.-4 ('Ij~ -.-4W bO('Ij I::
..e -.-4o..NII) 4.1o W
..-i :::l~
IJJW IJJ IJJ (J) :::ltJ :::l ;::l ;::l tJW tJ IJJ tJ '.-4
..e tJ ~ C) 4.14.1 o aJ o aJ0 tJ 0.. tJ I::I:: o IJJ o ECil 0. 0-.-4 0·.-4
aJtJ II)
W I::..e eoU..-io ;::lI::"t:leo .....
I::
eoII)
0..eotJoI::Cil 0.
..e
II)II)
'.-44.1e ('Ij
=' tJ4.1 •.-4co ..-i cotJ W E
-.-4 ('Ij I:: "0 •.-4..-i II) W tJ o W (J)0.. -.-4 ('Ij '.-4 (J) (J)('Ij I:: ('Ij Cil (J)
E ::l ..-i ::l I:: W W(J) W ::l (J) -.-4='"0 ('Ij 0" 0 "0 "o(J) E 0" 0..4.1
..-i-.-4 eo I:: Cil co eo 4.1 Cil -.-4 Cil ·.-4Cil Cil o Cil Cil Cil
..-i ~ 1::-.-4 I:: I I:: tJ I:: 0 I:: O~ I:: N I tJ tJaJ"t:l aJ C) aJ (J) W I:: aJ ~ aJ j.,C) aJ ..... (J) 0'.-4I:: eo eo ~ ('Ij 0 eo ('Ij Cil '.-4 Cil-.-4 eo I:: 0 I::..-iaJ =' .0-.-4 .o..-i .o..-i .0 0...0 0.. .0 0. Cil..-i Cil aJ~ - - ."" - .... ....---. - .. - ...... v .. -.., '01"_ ...., \II .....- --r ....... ·v _ __ .....--.- ....... '01# _ V .... r--, w ~ \U..... V \lJ ~......, v "'" .-...- \,&I ....
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ D D 8 8 a $ f ~ r3~~:-"_---+--+---t--1
Greenwood 414 - - - - - 32 - 117 - - - - - 875 - - - - - 1443
Colby P 45 95 - P - 30 86 P - - - - - P - - - - - 448
Bass - - 30 18 - - P 26 53 - - P - P 21 P - - - - 158
Bear Island 95 P 19 P - - P - 55 - - P 35 19 P P - - - 9 257
Birch 144 P P P P P P 1727 1394 P - P - - P 675 - - - - 9231
Bearhead 60 - - - - - 5 2 - - - - - - - P - - - - 67
Seven Beaver 2820 P - p - - P P a7500 P 8363 P P P P 1938 - - - - 8409
Pine 127 - - - - - 5 - 27 - - - - 5 21 - - - - - 185
Perch - - - - - - - - 3 - - - - - - - - - - - 3
Tofte - - - - - - 26 - 80 P - - - - 5 - - - 366? 477
Sand 98 - - 19 - - - - 40 - - - - - P 2 - - - - 159
Wynne - - 21 - - - - 8 3 - - - 3 - 5 P - - - - 40
White Iron P 115 - P 55 - P 76 275 P - - - - P P - - - - 1844
Turtle 63 - P - - - - - 23 P - - 179 P - - - 14 - 67 360
Gabbro 178 P P P 305 P P P 763 950 - P P P P P - - - - 8649
Triangle - - 24 P - - P 10 10 P - - 10 - P P 32 - - 10 109
Fall 34 - - - 29 - - 26 60 P - - - P 63 P - - - 10 222
Long 218 - - - - - 10 - 92 - - - - - 32 - - - - - 352
One 175 - - - - - P - 32 - - 69 P P 133 P - - - - 429
Cloquet 220 - - - - - P - 83 - - - P 16 108 P - - - 5 493
Clearwater 207 - P - - - P - 93 - 26 - - - 19 - - - - 77 446
s. McDougal 375 - 8 - - - 3 - 37 - - - - - 129 - - - - - 552
Slate 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 - - - - - 4
Big 121 P - - - - - P 184 - - P - 123 P 51 - - - 202 804
·-1
o,Lt"\
;..'
j
LJ\.
Wt-O:Jat-OZ
00
z0-en->LUa:
I a:0..,<t:
111~
'"' 0>- ,,t:0. t-o~
0 t-.....6 ()
w"i..,~ coc: :J0u en-
N t-CIl U.
..... <t:.0 I~ 0:
0
>-0:<t:Z-~
--'wa:C.
,..;(Ij
eOJ~
S OM=' 4J
oM til"0 (Ij.... ,.0..c:,o4J ='
§ s~ ::l
"0 SQ) ....til I:l~ oM
s a=' ::l~ K4J 0til "0(Ij (Ij~ ~::l (Ij
SOMtilo S
,..; ='>,~
"tJ (Ij~,..;
tiloM oM4J ~
til OJ>,4JU Q)o 0~ ~
Q)..c:(Ij U
(Ij (IjOM OM (Ij~ ~ ~Q)°M Q)Q)"O>'"ObOQ) (Ij Q) OMO"tJ 0 ~~ =' ~ Q)
(IjStiloNo~Q) •(Ij 0.
til='StilQ)
"0Q)~ 0.
(Ij"0
til ='=' (IjS Util oMOJ ~"0"0Q) (Ij
~ ='
til='4J
til (Ij=',..;S ='til UOJ ...."04J
OJ ~~ <lJ
til=' tilS ~til (IjOJ "0
"tJ ~Q) ='~,o
(Ij ....,..; ~
::l Q)bON.... ~~ ....
"0 ~
~o
"0o
S (Ij• =' ~~ til 4J4J (Ij OJtil ~ 4J(Ij 4J
.... OJ •~ "tJ,",~ (ljo. 11I (Ij Q)"tJ Q) 0' Q) til ..c: til ..c:..., ..c: til ..c: til \J ..... 'u ..... ... = I-' UI '0U U U U 0. U U 0. 0. '"' Q) til: :> 6- t/) t/) t/) t/) t/) t/) (J) t/) t/) t/) E-4 ><: E-4-_ ....--
Greenwood P - - - P - P - - 32 P - - P 435Colby - - P - P P - - 2 - - - - - 56Bass - P - P - - - 18 - 12 23 - P P 133Bear Island 4 P - P P P - - - - p - P - 74Birch - P P - P P - - 7 42 - - - - 165Bearhead 4 5 - 10 - - - - - - - - - - 55Seven Beaver - - - - 77 - - - - p p P - - 589Pine P 11 11 P P - - - - P - P P 111Perch 21 - - - - - - - - - - - - 3 63Tofte - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 21Sand p - - - 5 - - - - - - - P - 82Wynne - - - p - - - - - p - - - - 39White Iron - - - - 9 P - - P P P - - - 192Turtle P 7 - 19 P - - - - - -- - p - 94Gabbro - - - - - P - - - P P - - P 481
Triangle - - - p - - - - - - P - - - 39
Fall p - - - p - P - - 71 P - - P 229Long p 8 p - p - - - 10 - - - p - 94One P 16 - - p - - - - - p - - - 92Cloquet 68 197 P P P P P - - - - - P - 784Clearwater P P - - - - P - - - 12 - P - 149S. McDougal P - - P P - - - - - - - - 5 93Slate - - - - P - - - - - - - - - 34Big P .P - P P - 44 - P - - - 81 - ~77
I .....I'"
,.
1
II
1_. j
52 ~.J
tritractuse1anophorus
ysosphaerellaongispina
obryanavaricum
obryany1indricum
obryanivergens
obryanociale
obryanociale.· amer~canum
obryanertulia• protuberansobryanp.
lomonaskrokomoms
lomonasseudcornata
lomonasp.
iocytinumicuspididatumiocytinumupitatum .• Iong~son~num
iocytinump.
pitacoccuspiculatis
p.
uravella
uradamsii
ura
bonemap •
a1
AXA
en n n §> t"" "91 ""l c;") ""l ~ ~ en ""l '"d '"d en t::I:' t::I:' tlI1 os n c;") t""Cd ~ >'1 I» c: '< I» 0 ltl ~ ltl ltl ~ ro III 0 '1 I».... .... .... .... 0 I»< I» '1 I» 1Il .... ltl ;0;-
00 OJ ro 0 III ::;) .... ~ C" >'1 ~ ::;) ::;) .... >'1 ::;)ltl
" ::.t I» ..0 OQ .... I» C" " " ::;) e- " (') ro ltl >'1 (') >'1 1Il C" ltl::;) >'1 .... ltl ltl III ::r ::l ::r ::r '< ::l ctI
III (') ( c: CI::' III OQ 0 III III 1-4t::I:' OJ ctI 00 I» " .... 1-4III ~ .... 0c: " III '1OJ I» ~OQ III 0
::l < :sOJ '1III ~.... '1
T
, , I '"d '"d '"d I I I '"d I ..., I I I '"d '"d I '"d .... CenN VI VI N .... b
ChrI , I I I '"d • I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1
.- VI ..... .- .- Din- VI I 0- .- VI \".l '"d ..... ....... ..... 0- co '"d .... I .... ~
\D 0 VI .- ~ 0- N \".l ....... ~ 0- ....... ..... VI VI ....... 0- N \".l N b....
'"d I I DinI I I I I '"d ~ I I '"d I I I I I I I I I~
..., VIC
\".l .- .- .- N w DinN, ....... VI ~ ~ co I I I N co 0- N '"d I W I..., I.oJ I.oJ VI N \".l N 0' 0- VI VI 0' \0 ~ VI ~ 0 d....... DinI I I I I I' I .- I I '"d I I 0 I I ..... I I I I I..., 0 0 0- N
S
I I I ..., I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I J I Din0 s
varVI Din.- I '"d ....... '"d .- I ...,
~ VI '"d ~ I I I VI N I ..... J J~ co N co \".l N ~ 0- 0' VI ..... ~ co s
. varD.in
I I I I '"d .- I I '"d I .- I J J I I J I IVI \".l \".l co N \".l V1 S
I I I I J I I J I I I I I I J J J I I I I I MalVI ...,
a
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I J I I I I I I I I I Malp
.... .... ..... 0- N MalI 0- I V1 V1 '"d \".l I.oJ '"d .- I ~ \".l I I '"d V1 "'d ~ '"d I I .... .-
S
I I I I I I I I I "'d I '"d I I I I I \0 I I I J J I Ophb
I , I I J '"d .... I I I J I I "'d I I J I I J JOph
I.oJ VI VI VI cvar, I I I I I I I I "'d I '"d I I I I I I I I I I I I
Ophs
, , I I I I I I I ..... I I I I I I I I I I I I I I StiN
a
I , I I I I.oJ I I I I I I I I I I J I I I I I I I Syn...,a
~ .... .t:- ....., I I I J \0 \0 ~ ..... ....... I \0 J I.oJ I J co 0- J I J SynI.oJ ~ N 0- \0 0- VI ~ \0 ~ ~ .......
N U
, I I I J J J J J I I J I I I I I I I J I I 1 ISyn
sI I I J I J I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I J Tri
s.... .... ....I.oJ .- \".l N N ....... co VI ..... N ....... N \".l .- W N \".l TotI.oJ N co co N 0 ....... ....... ~ \0 VI 0- \0 VI .- ~ .- co ....... \".l \0 N ~ .........., 0- 0- \".l 0 0' co VI 0' .... co N VI 0' N \0 \0 \0 ....... .... 0- ~ \0
Table 4. ChrysophytaSampled in June or Jury, 1976, by' RCNSNumbers represent abundance of dominants in units/mI.
PRELIMINARY DRAFT SUBJECT TO MAJOR REVISION DO NOT QUOTE'" ..
53
roemonassp.
tal
yptomonaserosa
yptomonas
i:o~~flexayptomonasmarsonii
yptomonasovata
NOFLAGELLATES
ratiumhirundinella
stodiniuminers
enodiniumpenardinforme
enodiniumoculatum
sp.
tal
GLENOPHYTA
AXACRYPTOPHYTES
glenasp.
acusacuminatus
tal
achelomonassp.
acussp.
'lchelomonasvnlvocina
enodiniumsp.
ymnodiniumsp.
ridiniuminconspicuum
ridiniuumwisconsinenseridinium
tp en ~ n n 0 r-- ""1 ~ C') ~ ~ :r: CJ) ~ otl "tl CJ) t:l:l t:l:l tll1 t:l:l n C') r--.... ~ ~ t-' ::l 0 lU f'1 Ql c.: '< lU 0 ~ I-'- ~ ~ .... ~ Ql 0 f'1 Ql
00 II) ~ 0 ~ ::l t-' .... 0" f'1 I-'- ::l ::l '"" f'1 ::l <: Ql f'1 Ql U1 t-' ~ jll;'"
" :x tJ· .0 OQ t-' Ql 0" " " ::l 0- " ("l ~ ~ f'1 ("l f'1 U1 0" ~ ~
a> ("l
~c.: ::l f'1 t-' ~ ~ ~ ;;T ::l ;;T ::r' '< ::l U1
0 ~ OQ 0 ~ ~ I-l ~
0 Ql " ..... I-l ta:l lU en 0c: " ~ '1 ~ Po .....
10
00 ~ 0 II) lU PoII) '1 :s < ::l... ~ Po
'1T
1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1Ch, I I I I 1 -I 1 I 1 1
w ~ 1 ..- 1 \0 a- t ~Cr..., \J1 - N - \0 ..- - w I ~ 1 ~ N ..-
~ (X) w a- (X) .... \0 ..., - a- ..... ..- a. \0 0 (X)
OJ
- I w 1 VI 1 1 I 1 VI otl w ..- N I 1 1 - I a. 1 I ~ 1 Cr~ ~ N OJ ..., 0 \0
va
1 I I I ..- 1 1 I I I I I I I 1 I 1 1 ..... 1 "tl 1 I I Crw
~ - 1 I 1 I 1 ..- I ..... I a. (X) I I I I ..., I ~ \0 I - 1 CrN OJ a. 0 N VIN
N - N N W \0 ..- .... w .... ~ \0 ..... N ..- W .... N N - - a. a- ~ ToVI ..., - - a- dJ w \0 W N W W a. ..... .... ~ w 0 0 0 ~ CP..., a- 0 N CP
Dr
"tl I VI I "tl - "tl w w I I "tl "tl otl "tl "d "'d "d "'d "tl N VI I VI Ce-VI 1 I N I I I I I I I 1 1 I I I 1 I "d I 1 I I 1 Cy
I 1 1 I I I 1 I 1 1 I - I I I I I 1 1 I I I I I Gl
1 I 1 I I I 1 1 w 1 I 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I Gl
1 - 1 \0 VI 1 I ..- I ..- VI w I I I I .... ~ .... I I I I I Gl0 w .... \0
I I I 1 VI I I I I I I I I I I I I I "d I w I I I G
I ~ I I I I 1 I - I "d I ..- - I w VI I ..- I I I I I Pe0 0 0'1 N 000 VI
..., I 1 I 1 "d "d 1 otl I ..- I I "d I a. VI I "tl I I I I I PeN 0
I 1 1 1 N ~ ..- I 1 I 1 I I 1 I 1 I I otl I I I - I Pe- 00 0
.... ~ VI ..- w a- .... .... .... - N ~ - N 0 W N ~ ..- - VI VI ..- VI To~ ~ .... ~ ~ W 0'1 a. VI 0 N \0 .... VI- ..-
EU
I w otl I I otl 1 I "tl .... N I I I I otl I "tl I otl I 1 otl VI Eu
• 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I otl I 1 I 1 1 I .1 I 1 -' 1 I 1 I Ph
N I otl I I otl otl I I 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I otl "tl 1 1 VI Ph
I I I I w 1 I 1 I 1 1 I I I I N I I 1 1 1 1 I 1 Tr,a.
I I VI 1 w 1 otl 1 I I 1 1 I I I I VI N I otl VI 1 I 1 Tr
N w (X) 0 a. 0 0 0 0 - N 0 0 0 0 N VI W 0 ..- OJ 0 0 -\0 0 To
Table 5. Cryptophyta, Pyrrophyta. EURlenophytaSampled in June or July, 1976, by RCNSNumbers represent abundance of dominants in units/!DX!_
PRELIMINARY DRAFT SUBJECT TO MAJOR REVISION DO NOT QUOTE
..JW0:10.
WtO:;)
aIoZ
oozoen>
~W
.eo:l/)
~o:§ 0
-,«,::20l-IoW 'Ii
-,co:;)
enlLl.«0:o>0:«Z
~
III -0 IIIe Col ~0 ..... CiJ~ 0....0
~ ij ~ecn:z:;
iI
I
LJ
\Q
<U......0asfo4
~I
III~
t:(Ijc::
1-.-4e
U) 0z-oucx: ....
o>..
..0 <UtJ
- .C::r.l \0 r.l~,....">.0' c::.c .... ='0.. ..0o • ~
-.-4 ~
~ QJ ~
r.l..o c..... 0 GJ..... ~ III0.-4 U QJU 0 ~(Ij 0..
l:Q C CJ--.-4~
.....(Ij
(IjW
(Ij (Ij-.-4 ~
~ ~(Ij III
..... <U
..... c::QJ QJ
l/)
='tJIII
-.-4 QJ-0 (Ijo ~c: (Ij(Ij bO
..c: (Ij0..-.-4
c:
(Ij-.-4c:: IIIQJ -.-4
..... IIIo c:III QJ0-.-4N ~
<U
(Ij~ (Ij
(Ij (Ij -.-4 (IjW III ..... c:: w(Ij (Ij (Ij -.-4 =' (Ij QJ QJ
(Ij ..... (Ij tJ -.-4 ~ (Ij (Ij (Ij S -.-4 ..... III~ =' ~ -.-4 ..c: (Ij .......... ..... (Ij ..c: 0-.-4
-.-4 c:: -.-4 ..... tJ <Il =' =' =,..c: tJ III bOIII (Ij III (Ij III c:: tJ 0.. tJ..o III o c::o ~ o ~ N -.-4 -.-4 =' -.-4 =' N 0.. N 0
III(Ij c::~ (Ij
-.-4 ~
III III0-.-4.....
,.
l/)l/) -.-4c: UJ
(Ij (Ij (Ij QJ (Ij c:UJ -.-4 c: -.-4 =' -.-4 QJ (Ij
-.-4 ~ -.-4 ~ ~ ~ c: (Ij ='QJ (Ij tJ (Ij ~ (Ij 0 ~ bOc: ..... =' ..... til ..... ~ -.-4 -.-40 -.-4 0.. -.-4 c: -.-4 0 lIl..o
..... Q. bO(Ij bOO bO~ o S
(Ij..........QJ •to..
(Ij (Ij..... ~..... ::3QJ c::
..0-.-4e
(Ij.....
l/) ..... (Ij (Ij<U <U (Ij ..... tJ.c c: l/) ..... -.-4~ o 0 QJ c:c: 0.-4 S ~ (Ij(Ij ~ ~ 0-0c: Q. QJ 0 ..... 0~ ..r;; Ul &..I~ U,.C = C ~ Ul Po III Cll U Cll U Cll U r-1 Cll f'*1 ·u r-1 OU r-1-"" ......... ;> ~ ;> Ul ... Ul .,.., ...... .,.., .... .... ... ""t;j- 0tJ III >.. >.. -.-4 ~ ~ ~ QJ QJ <U QJ -.-4 (Ij (Ij 0.-4
~ ~~
------ < < U U U t=l ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ :£:: ~ Z :z :z :z U) E-< E-<
Greenwood - 186 - - - P - - P 54 10 - - - - - 5 - P P 44 330Colby P 50 P P P P 29 - 81 53 P 8 - - P - P - - P P 254Bass - 159 16 P - - P - 80 212 P - - - - - P - P P 122 647Bear Island P 144 P P P P 71 - P 80 P 134 P - - - P - P P P 628Birch p 2538 P P P P - P P 371 170 P - - - - P P P 102 89 3462Bearhead - 1092 P - 5 - - - P 29 - - - - - - P - - 3 16 1158Seven Beaver NOT SAMP EDPine - 121 P P - P - - 34 P - - 16 - P P P P 39 P 32 299Perch - 133 53 - - - - - P 32 P - - - - - P P 181 - 483 945Tofte - 172 P P - - - - 86 P P - - - - - P - 11 - 11 289Sand - p P P - 5 - - 992 P 11 P 11 - - - P P P P 159 1193Wynne p 50 - - - - - - 312 - 5 10 P - - - - p P P 16 420White Iron P 1042 P P P P P - P 859 100 P - P P - P 62 - P 62 2316Turtle - 48 11 - - - - - 122 - - - - - 11 - - - p - 281 473Gabbro P 298 P P P - P P 34 47 134 P - - P - P 18 P P P 602Triangle 5 467 - - - - - - 159 58 - - - - - - - - - P 117 807Fall p 173 P - - P - - p P 147 l' 236 - P - P - 94 P 74 1047
l-lhiteface Res. - 10 - - - - - - 16 76 - 3 - - - - p - - - 16 142One P 144 P - P - - - - 321 68 P 118 - - - P P 12 - P 915Cloquet P 368 P 13 - - - - 58 113 p - - p p - 47 - - - P 860
CleaI1Jater P 80 P - - - - - P 74 - - 106 - P - P P 16 P 143 664
s. McDougal P 313 P P - P - 64 P 64 80 P P P P P P - - - 58 876
Slate - 160 - - - - - - - 3 - - - 3 - 3 5 - - - - 188
B1g -- 158 P P P - - - 128 148 P P P - - - 112 P P P 244 1129
~an
-:l
..\0...,(7\
Cl"'<
F;Zen
~
~.....III
'"(")::r.....o.,o
't1::r'<
"III
enIIIa
't1.....IIICo
....:;:l
g>"oCl"III.,
zc:~III..,III.,III
't1..,III01III::s"~c::;:l0-
~nIII
oH\
0o13.....::sIII:;:l
"III......::sc:::;)....."01a.....
nedesmusenticulatus
ogoniump.
goetiap.
chmeriellaunaris
nedesmusbundans
katothrixelatinosa
orinalegans
ystisp.
drigulafitzeri
cigeniaetrapedia
cigeniaruncata
marj,ump.
cigeniapiculatn
cigeniarregularis
cigeniauadrata
istrodesmusalcatus
istrodesmusalcatusacicularisistrodesmusa lcatU"'limIrabl. sryococcusraunii
aerozosmap.
ndlyos1W1llanum
nedesmusuadricauda
roederiaetigera
roederiaudayi
urastrutllp.
raedron1nimum
tellaotryo1des
al
AXA
-If ~-.
tl:l (/) (A (") n- o 5t 'Tt rl C) H ;; ~ tJ) H --0 --0 tJ) ~ ~ I;l1 to (") G l""..... ..... ..... ..... ::J III .., PJ C '< III 0 III ..... III III .... III III o' .., 'I»
OQ III III 0 III ..... ..... .... 0'. .., .... ::;) ::J M'l .., ::;) < III .., III 1Il ..... III ;<:"
" ~ III ..0 " ..... III 0- " " ::;) 0- " n III III .., n .., 1Il cr III IIIIII n ( c: III :;:l .., ..... III III III ::r ::J ::r ::r '< ::;) III
0 III M'l ()Q 0 III III .... C0 III " III ..... .... to III III 0c: " n III ., III 0- ..... 0
OQ III III 0 III III 0-III ., :;:l < :;:l..... :xl III 0-
III .,~ T
An"'Q I !'oJ ..- "'Q --0 I --0 I I ~ !'oJ ..- Vt N I..J ~ ~ ~ ~ "'Q I "'Q..- ..- (Xl I..J 0 !'oJ
An"'Q I Vt !'oJ ~ N I ~ ..- I I I W ..- ~ !'oJ ~ 00 ~ ~ I I ~
(7\ ..- ..- ..- Vt (7\
vAn"'Q I I I I ~ I I..J I "'Q I ..- I "'Q I I I I !'oJ ~ ~ ~ I
\0 (Xl Vtv.
~ I ~ ~ "'Q ~ ~ ~ ~ I "'Q "'Q I ~ ~ ~ "'Q "'Q "'Q (Xl ~ "'Q "'tl Bo
"'Q I I "'Q "'Q (Xl I ~ I I '"d '"d I ~ '"d '"d ~ "'Q I ~ '"d I ~Co
I I I "'Q (7\ I I ~ I I I I I I I ..- ~ I '"d ~ I I ..- Cr(Xl (7\ (Xl
I I I I '"d I I I I I I ..- I I I I I I I ..- ~ I I Cr!'oJ
N I '"d ~ ..- ~ I N I I '"d I I '"d I ~ ~ ~ I !'oJ I I ~Cr
Vt !'oJ \0 I..J(7\
~ I I I (7\ 00 I ~ I ~ '"d '"d I ~ I I ..- I '"d '"d "'Q '"d ..- Cr0 (7\ (7\
"'Q I I I I I I Vt I I..J I '"d I I I I I I '"d I I I I Crl0
0 El,..- I '"d '"d ~ ~ I "d Vt I I I '"d '"d I '"d ~ H I I I '"d I '"d0
en
~ EUII I I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I I ~ I I ..- I I
t%1
~ I I I I I I ~ I I I I I "d I I N I ~ I I I I Ki:..-
..- I I I I (7\ I ~ I ....... I "d I I I I I I '"d I I I '"d MOl~ 0 Vt Vt
:
~ I I I I I I I I N I I I I I ..- I I I I I I I Oel(7\
!
"'Q '"d Vt '"d (7\ "d I N N I '"d ~ Vt - ~ I N W ~ - ~ ~ - OoeI..J ~ (7\ - (7\ - 00l
I I I ~ "d "d I "d ~ I ~ ~ I I I ..- ~ '"d ~ '"d ~ I I Que(7\
J
"d I..J I I ~ I I I I I I I I I I I ~ I '"d ~ I ~ I SCE«
"'Q"d ftl
SCE~ I I '"d ~ I ~ I '"d !'oJ ~ I I I "d "'Q I ~ '"d I
(7\ (
~ I I '"d W '"d I ~ I I..J '"d .... I ~ ,~ "'Q '"d ....... "'Q I I Vt SCE\C
Vt(
"'Q w .... I I I .... ~ , ~ I ~ , I '"d , I "d N "'Q ~ !'oJ !'oJ Set(7\ 0 ~. Vtf
I ..- I I , I - I I I I , I I \0 I I I I I ~ , I set..... (7\
j
- I I ~ "'Q I I "'Q I I ..- I I I I I W I I I I I I spt0 .... N0 e
I I I ~ I - I "'Q ~,
~ I I I I "d ~ , I I kl I "'Q Spcwf
~ klSta
"'Q I I ~ "'Q "'Q I "d I I I I I I I '"d "'Q I "'Q I IS
..- I I "'Q "d I I I I , I I I ~ , I "'Q i"d I '"'Q ~ "'Q , Tet..-III
WesI I I I I I I I I I t t I , I I Vt I t I I t Ib00
~ ~ - w - - - N
~ - ~Tot
~ ::; ~ 00 (7\ W N ~ ~ 00 00 (7\ !'oJ I..J ....... Vt N - (7\ N \0..., 00 Vt 0 (7\ ..., ..., 0 N W - !'oJ (Xl I..J ..- (7\ (7\ ~ N
,.,
-----,3.LOnO 10N 00 NOISIJ\3Cl ClOrVV\I 01 1::>3rSnS l:lVl:lO Al:lVNIV'J113l:ldj
..J
~~
'Wt-O:JaIoZ
oczoen~
~j.U
11:::Jr:"'0~
~-
~tf)~
I 5 "-'P''cJ->.~t-.~~iu-w-~; 'OJ~~ECP)u C)
CllO ~
~~ ~~'O ~~~ ~t~to
..c: co :lUCI);'>
a. ex:~ ~~ Zi-lI' -
~
..Jw!
t0: .\,a.
Cll.-4
Cll.-41-0 OJ .-4=' > Cll
....
..-fIII
Cll 81-0 Cll=''0
8 ~::3~
'ri Cll~ c::>-'0U 1-0o U..-f='
IIICllc=og.-40.
IIIIII ='c= Cll 8
o c= 0:>-. o~1-0 8 0
..0 • 0 1-0o 0. .-4 ~
III(:1 ..-f
C'OC'O ·ri'rll-o (:1I-oQJ QJ
(:1 QJ c: Cl1D (:1 4-l0.-4 0.-1::3 04-l:>-. CI1 :>-. ='~ :>-. 0I-o·ri 1-0 ~o I-o..c:
..0 U ..0 1-01-0 ..0 (:1o 0 0 OJo. 0 C'O
IIIc=c= QJ
o be:>-'1-01-0 QJ
..0 >0 ....
8='U....
c: 1-00'0:>-'(:11-0 'ri
..0 ....o :>-.
8='c= u
0 ....:>-.1-01-0 CI1
..0 >o Cll
IIIIII ='=' 1-0~ 0u..c:Cll 0.1-0 0~ c:.... Cll1-0.-4~ OJ~ c=..o c=..o c= u c='O c= III c= III c= > (:1 III .-4 Cll .-4 III ..c:8 c: Cll ~;;, ~OJ .... .... .... .... ..... .... ..-f
~ ~ ~:>-.
tf) ~.- U Q Q Q Q Q ~ Cl Cl U')
Greenwood 2 47 - - - - - - - 28 - - 7 84Colby - 8 1 27 - 2 - - - - - - - 37Bass p p p p p p - - - 5 - - - 5:Bear Island - p 2 P - - - - 17 - - - 16 66Birch 1 24 p 24 - - - - - 1 1 - - 51Bearhead 8 8 108 228 - 299 - - 34 p - - P 690Seven Beaver ~OT S OOLE
Pine 8 45 5 121 - 21 - 5 - 5 - - 5 215Perch 5 133 - 21 - 5502 - - - 16 - - P 5677Tofte 3 p - 138 12 - - - 5 20 - - - 176Sand P p - P - P - P - - - 5 37 42Wynne - - - 102 - - - - - p - - 446 548White Iron 1 76 - 8 - - - - - P - - - 85Turtle - 361 - 1618 - 11 318 32 - - - - - 2340Gabbro P 9 4 71 30 P - - - 3 - - - 120Triangle - 32 - 1040 - P - - 53 - - - 16 1141Fall 3 184 - 26 - P - P 10 - - - 24 247
Whiteface Res. -- - - - - - - - 16 - - - - 16One P 50 18 76 - P P P - 8 - P 16 176Cloquet 8 47 - p - p - - 129 P - - 5 189
Clearwater p 11 11 32 - 707 154 P - P - - P 920
S. McDougal 42 - - - - - - - 16 - - - - 58
Slate 3 8 - 291 - P - - 58 8 - - 3 371
Big - 79 - 12 104 39 - - - p - - - 234
\0lI'\
I
i
t__J\.
L.wtO::>aIoZ
oozo
...JI,W
0:,a.
~C/)"--:~ >:~W.::1 0:.c:.... 0:'g:
""'0g...,:5~,e
~.g ~u
;:0 0 ·~'ClJ I-~~ l-
\.,:) ro r-
~-g () ~.... ~ W ~~co ...,
~~ enB ~ ::>~ ~ C/)
Cl.
~ ~ ~ I->'"0 ttl U..r:. CJ l-lgo ........ ~~ ~-2 0:>. Ill;;l 0U '41);;;::
>0:«Z
~
CD
QI.....,rJ
"...
l/l.....l/l0.o III
"..-l +J"0 co:8 ~ .-l
0. 0.::3 Cll
e;:)4J111 I1l e(.J 13 S ;:) 3 s"1"'4 I1l c: "1"'4 ;:) c: "1"'4..... (lI (.J o (lI l/l ..... I1l "..-l ;:) l/l o..-l co 1110. I1l "1"'4 c: I1l I1l l/l 111 111 C1l l-l ".~ l-l c: Ul ;:) l/l l/l e "..-l 0..-l13 ;:) ::3 c: C1l ::3 l/l "..-l Ul 4J (.J Ul OJ ()() OJ co ;:) (.J ;:) ;:) 0..-l l-l I1l l-l S;:)"0 0" 0 e 0" 0.4J o.l/l OJ I:: co I:: C1l "..-l (.J "..-l (.J Ul C1l o 4J 0 ::3..... "1"'4 III C1l co 4J o 111 111 C1l 111 o..-l ..c 111 ..c -..-l ..c ..... (.J 4J U l-l ..c +J I1l 4J .......... l-l c: I I:: U N I U (.J u..c 4J ..... o.N 0.C1l o C1l o C1l 111 l-l C1l c: C1l "0(lI"O (lI l/l (lI c: ..... Ul o 0..-l o (.J o :::l Ul +J Ul ()() g ~ U 0. >'C1l ..... 0..-l ..... 0..-lc: III C1l 0 co co I:: 0 1:: ..... I:: co 1::"0 o (lI o C1l o Ul .0 ()() ..... 13 ..... e(lI ::3 .0 ..... .a ..... co ..... co C1l 111 ..... Cll ..... ..... ::3 ..... Cll o 0..-l 0 ..... ODCll "1"'4 (lI ..... 0.~ '" ....
~- ~ ~.......... ,.<;; -0 .,J;:; 'U .,J;:; I=i 'U..:.:; OJ I=i l-l..-i l-l'O 1:: ..... U ()() U l/l o UJ 11l tJ ""'00 0. P- o. P- o 0 ..c ..c
~l/l l/l ..c 2 0< <: <: <: <: u u u u 0 0 p... E-<-_.---
Greenwood 5 - P - 9 - - 7 p 2 - - - - - - 23Colby - P - 190 6 - - p P - - - - P 5 P 239Bass P 11 138 1284 p - - p p p - - - - - - 14338ear Island 90 P P - 61 P - 65 33 P P - - - p - 324Birch 42 - - p 169 - - 10 P - - - - - 52 P 364Bearhead p P - P 18 3 - 34 P - - - - - - - 55Seven Beaver NOT SAHpl EDPine 3 - - - 3 P - P P P - - - p - - 6Perch 53 - - - 32 - - 16 - - - - - p - - 106Tofte - 24 P 236 268 P - P - 53 - - - - 29 - 642Sand P 5 P - 16 - - 16 p - - - - - - - 37\.lynne - P - 18 - - - p p - - - - P - - 18\.lhite Iron 62 - p 40 33 61 P P P - - - - p p P 491Turtle 58 - - - 32 69 - 74 - P P 26 - - - - 280Gabbro P P P 322 101 - - P P - - - - 58 - 18 606Triangle - 37 5 292 26 P - P 5 - - - - p - - 365Fall 116 - P 58 184 P 1 P 68 P P - 87 - - - 620
\.'h1 teface Res. - - - 501 - - - - 5 - - - - - - - 506One P - P P 10 - - 10 3 P 3 - - 3 - - 29Cloquet 105 - - - 158 26 - 45 P 18 P - - p - - 399Clearwater p P - - 26 37 16 16 P 16 P - - - - - 148s. McDougal - 5 - - - - - P - - - - - - - - 16Slate - 5 18 - - - - - - - - - - - - - 23Big 37 - 24 23 150 60 P P P P - - - p - - 310
......an
1_ ..\.
VI00
....III4.1
fIlIIIeo5o.....al.c:.u Q.III fIl
coIIIe IIIo es~o u
..... 0co al :>::l • .c: .....u Q. U 0III fIl Ill:>
enw~g;~.
ozW..Jt:l
....III4.1
!3::lu
S ~ S::l Q. ::l~ U) ~ ~
e e C al~ 0 ~ ....'tl () 'tl r-4~ d ~~... ~ ... )
3~
e~
-0o~
5::l~
C•.-4"0odal
3~
c~ (f)-0 ...o OJ
4.1 dU)~
iIfu units/ml...........ale.~
5"0::l e~ ::l4.1 ~
Ill~
I-l.c:
Cryptophyta, Pyrrhophyta, Euglenophyta.Samples in October, 1976 by RCNSNumbers represent abundance of dominerts
~
(f) (f) ~ (Il ~ (Il (f) jIII III Ill'~ III -0 III III ..Jexec Cal c elll tt.lo alOO 04.1 0 Ox e"
S ~~ 5 ~ S~ Sill 5~ j4.1 0 al 4.1'" 4.1'" 4.14.1 4.1 ~ ~ ~0. L4 ~ 0. cc 0. 0 o.cc 0. OJ ~ 0>. al >. 6 >. e >.:> >.... .., z
(Il
IIIeo6 IIIo (f)4.1 00.L4>'al
entt.l~
>:I:Cl.o~Cl.>-
~tJ
"
Ta.ole 10.
... ... . ... ... ... ...~
.... al >. ..... >. al al 0 :s .c: ... ... 0u u :>u u u u 0 u U e" e" ~ ~ ~ tt.l ~ ~ ~ ~..
Greenwood 54 - 28 - - - 82 P - - - - - 0 p - - 0Colby - 4 - - 14 - 18 - - - - - - 0 - - - 0
,Bass 64 - - - 5 5 74 5 - - - - - 5 P 16 P 16Bear Island 50 - - - 2 - 52 P - P - - - 0 P 16 P 21 ,
Birch - 10 - - 53 - 62 1 - - - - - 1 P - - 0Bearhead 26 - 39 - - 26 109 P P P P P - 0 - - - 0Seven Beaver NO SAHJ LED NOT SAMPI ED ~OT SP iHPLEIPine 58 - 13 - - - 71 P P 5 - 3 - 8 - - P 0Perch 11 - P - - - 11 P - - - P P 0 - P - 0Tof te . 17 35 P - - 11 70 5 - - 2 - - 7 - - 3 3Sand P 21 - - - 5 26 P - - - P - 0 P - - 0Wynne 60 26 - .,. - - 86 P - - - P - 0 - - 3 3White Iron - 1 - 1 14 - 16 P - - - - - 0 - - - 0Turtle 74 26 - - 16 - 116 - - - - 90 P 9 - - P 0Gnbbro - 8 - 13 46 - 67 - - - - - - 0 - - - 0'Triangle 85 58 - - - P 159 P - - - - 5 5 - 5 - 5'Fall 44 3 - - 45 - 92 3 - - - - - 3 - - 5 5!\'!hiteface Res. - - 79 - - 10 89 - - - - - - 0 - 3 - 3
One 21 - - - - 3 24 P - - - - - 0 P - 13 13
Cloquet 10 P 3 - - - 13 P - P P - - 0 - P P 0Clearwater 32 - - - - P 32 P P P - - - 0 p - - 0;S. McDougal 90 - 42 - - P 132 - - - - - - 0 - - - 0
Slate 84 - 74 - - 3 161 - - - - - - 0 - - - 0
Big 32 10 - - 16 P 67 P 2 2 - - P 4 P - 18 20
":0mr-~
z»JJ-<oJJ»."-IenCOJC-
~ mo-I-I
'0!::.»C-
OJJ
:0m<enozoozo-I
oCo~
m
r--:II!I
,
""D':0m'r~
z»:JJ-<o:JJ»"T1-f(f)
COJC-
~ mo-f
-f'0i~,»
C-
O:JJ
:0m<-(f)
ozoozo-f
oCo-Im
~\0
.-Icu..,
CU~ C1l
"'0 CQJ.-IC :l
CU..,cu !il
'.-4 ~~ ..,.!il fJl
.... Q)
.-I CQJ QJ
.0'+-4
It!S....(11en......,!il
!il tJ~ ...."'0.-1QJ QJC'tl
C1l....c (11Q) ....
.-I eno CfJl Q)0·...IN ""•.-4 QJ
C1l....~Q)
C1l til.... .t:~ 0.!il fJl
.... 0:l ~
l:l CJt:: It!
c.c.(11
C1l !ilC1l U ....~ .... .t:
.... .-1 tJ(11 til fJl0·'" IN
r-4 .... ..,
C1l..,C1l
CU.-l~ :l
.... CfJl !ilo ""r-4OD
(11C1l l:l~ til.... ..,en eno 'J'1r-4't1
CUC1l :l~ co.... ....en.oo S
r-4 (lj
~m~Q) ..,
C (11o :l
.t: coo.cS III
Q)!il
C1l ........ ~~ Q)!il.t:
.-I U~ Cco tilIII :>
en~(11
til C~ Q)~ C!il 0........
.... 0co~(lj U
sQ) :l:l ..,C tilQ) co.., C
o!il ....S Q)o.., .CO >
C1l C1l.-I U.-I~Q) C.., !il0"'0
.-I 0u,tJ
CU.-I.-IQ) C1lC eno 0~ s)..< )..<
41 0iJ~
"
Table 11. Diatoms (Bacillariophyta)Sampled in July, 1977, by RCNSNumbers represent abundance of dominants in units/ml.
~~
01 en41 en.t:~..,..,C :::l!il Cc~
.I: S~ u ...~
>.~ ~. ~ ~.
~ ~Q) Q) Q) .... ....
~>. til >. 0
< u 0 ~ ~. ::E:: ::E:: ~ z p... til E-l til E-l- --
Greenwood p 31 - 203 23 P - - p - p 34 - - - 23 P 411
Colby 78 - - P 36 - P P P P P 15 - - - P 20 222
Bass - p 34 83 36 P - - - ... - p - - - P 45 236
!lear Island - p 42 28 P - - 17 P P - - - p - 80 - 235~
Birch-) - 171 P P 99 - - 94 p 39 P p - p - 216 - 689
Birch-l - - p p - 78 - - 28 44 34 p - p - 28 - 286-Bearhead - 13 p - 16 - - - - - - p - 10 :.- 10 - 93
Seven Beaver - 166 p p p - - 171 p - 42 36 - p - 42 - 641
Pine - 6 - 6 21 - - p p - - 16 - - - p - 75
Perch - P - - - p - - - - - - - - - p - 0
Tofte P - - 4 P 16 3 - - - ... p 3 - - p p 36
Sand P P P - 134 - - p 60 p 12 - - - 8 p - 265
Wynne - 174 - P P - - - 75 - - - - 251- - - -White Iron P 214 p - 445 - 71 2lq p 71 - - - - p - 1123-Turtle 83 8 - 21 P - - - - - - - p - 249 P 365
-Ir
I
11' '"
3J.ono lON 00 NOISIJ\3~ ~orvV\l 011,~ ~ ~f'1 .... ::l!"t'- M :J_ ltl ltl
ltlHf'1g
----------,
fr~8~ls~1=ll8~a{E~~~~I1~...8d .Jc.r?nltlltl., no.,tDt:7'ltl (1)
(1):::r ::s:::r:::r:::r -<=' Ul'(1) I I H C
ttllU ~l...)fIl 0
~ Q.. ~ &.< ='ltl Q.f'1
TAXA
..;
~~(1)
....N
, " >,;1 (X) >,; >,;IN >,; '"ell_ I...) >,;1- >,; I~ N ~ ~ ~
", - 'I>,; , I I' I ,I>,; I '" I I
(X)
Ankistrodesmusta.l.catus
v. acicularis
Ankis trodesmusfalcatus
v. mirabilis
~
..:-.....
~tn
~~~~9fIlQ.~
of'1 .... f'1(1) =' 0
~~-g.(1) c: '<(/) ~ r?(1) '< II)=' ..r? lU \0c:r.....,c: .....,=' ..Q. cr~'<o :::0(1) Q~tnQ.oe....='~r?en....='§....r?en......e~
I I
>,; I
N "tI
"N'lJ, ,
>,; ,
I ....(X)
I I
>,; I
, (X)
>,; I
.....,~
(X)....l'J
I
NVI
N
I 'I I 0\(X)
I "tII"tI "tI
I I I I "tI
I ~I I I.....,, 'I' ,, 'I I ,
I ~I>'; ~Ul
.....,. " I ,
I ~I~ ~
I I I I "tI
>,; I 1"tI >,;
>,;1 I
VII ,
I 1_o
, I I
, , I
I I VI
, I>,;
I I I
"til Ul
11 I
'I I
I >,; I ,
, '"I NIN
, 'I I
(X) I I I
, 'I I
I >,; I I
I I'"
I >,; I I
I I I I
"tI >,;I"tI
I...)
~
I...)....
"tI
N-
Arthrodesmus sp.
Binuclearia sp.
Botryococcusbraunii
Chlorococcumnumicola
Closteriumceratium
Crucigeniaapiculata
Crucigeniaguadrata
Crucigeniarectangularis
Crucigeniatetrapedia
Dic'tyosphaeriumpulchellum
Elakatothrixgelatinosa
I ,
, ,
>,; "tI
II' "tI 11 I I ..... 1 I I >,;1 I N Io
1" , >,;1 I I ~I I I ~II I I
"tII"tI ;X; 'I "tI ~ 1\ "tI "tI 1\>'; >,; >,;
Mougeotia sp •.
Oocysdsparva
Oocys tis sPl"'
- >,;(X)1I"tI I '1"tI "tI >,;I"tI I "tI1 I I I pediastrum tetras v.
tetraodron
II I "tI ~1 0 ~ >,;1 I , ~I"tI I IN "tI-, , 'I I , I I I , II I 'I 11- , I
Quadrigulapfi tzeri
Selenastrum spp.
.----r II' - I TTl I I I I Scenedesmusbalatonius
N - "til I.... (X)
, "til >,; "tI (XlI "tI (X) "tI I I - I
I ,
>,; "I:l
II' ,
II >,; ,
'I' "tI I I "tI VI 'I I ..... "tI
II' "tI 111"11 N>';
Scenedesmusdenticulatus
Scenedesmusquadricauda
'"Scenedesmusserratus
I I
VI I
'I ~ "tI II>,; I
V:I s:- s:- ~I >,; Io
II I , 'II , I
>,;1 Ul ;X; 0\ 1~ I C;
""S cenedesmus sp.
Sphaerocyst!sschroeter!
VII I I >,; 1"I:l I -0\
"I:l "tI
s:-_ (X)
N "Q\ N
'I' ,~..~
~I ~ ~
,I>,; 'i'
N1...)1..... ~~ _ Ul
N ~ 00\1 ~ \0 0 I"o (X)Uls:-O
N
~ ~
Sphaerozosma spp.
Total
09
61
1. 0'\ N (Xl C1'I C1'I ...:T 0 N ,..., \0 If'\ N If'\ ~ \00 .... .... 0 \0 C1'I \0 .... ...:T N ...:T N \0 If'\\0 ...:T .... (Xl ,..., ,..., .... ~ N
(Xl1 1 p... 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 I ~ p...
.... IIf'\
1 I 1 I I 1 1 I 1 .... N I I
0 1 .... 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 p... 1
N:J I 1 1 N 1 I I 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1
.... ,..., ..;:t N\0 If'\ N \0 (Xl C1'I
:J C""l 1 If'\ p... .... (Xl If'\ C""l .... I I 1 1 .-4 .-4
:J I I I I I N I 0- I I I I I I
N..;:t (Xl
~:J 1 1 .... I I""l I 1 1 1 1 I 1 p... 1
(Xl..;:t ...:T 1.1"\
N N p... p... p... p... I p... .... I -.:t 1 1 I .-4
I""l.-4
..;:t 0y. I I -.:t 1 1 I 1 0'\ I 1 1 1 1 1 I""l
0Y I 1 1 .... 1 I N 1 I I 1 1 1 I 1
I""l-.:t
0 0 .... (XlY If'\ .-4 1 I""l I I .... ,..., p... 1 N 1 1 p... .-4
If'\ ...:T 00 \0 0'\ \0 If'\ -.:t \0 \0
YN 1 p... .... p... p... co ...:T N ,..., ,..., 1 1 I""l N
,...,N I""l
Y I I N I ,..., p... P- I I I C""l I p... p... I
If'\ I""l'I 1 p... I \0 I P- p... I I 1 1 p... If'\ 1
II.
1 I I p... 1 p... 1 1 1 1 .... 1 1 1 1
I""l0'\ 0 C""l
I 1 If'\ I N N 1 I I 1 .... I I I p...
co ....\0 ,..., .... co ...:T If'\ (XlC""l ,..., p... i-< p... C""l N If'\ \0 \0 1 .... I .... p....... \0
.r. ...~ <IIc:: > c::
"tJ co co 00 .... "0 <II ...0 Ul C""l .... al I:Q t-4::r t-4 I 1 <U <II
en c:: >. .s:: .c .c c: .s:: <II <II <II ....<II <II ..0 Ul ~ U U ~ eu <II U u "0 c:: ., u
.,:,I. <II .... Ul co ~ ~ l1l :> c: ~ .... c: c: ~ ...co ... 0 co <1l ~ ..... <1l <II ~ <1l 0 I1l ~ § ='~. C U IZ:1 1IQ I:Q IZ:1 I:Q Vl p... p... ~ Vl ~ ~
aenbe-solleuaeq-euy
sn;:q:~auUl'H
sn~:>o:>o.1tp
stnua~
epo:re1n~sO
e~eut:Ula8
epo~enl:>s
Sl.1~ sn:>eTlDnl.1aeqdsoqdwo
mnplnedmnl.1aeqdsoTao
vxv
re~o
mnue11a8aeumnl.1aeqdsoTao
mnue18ulz:Jan')flDnl.1aoqdsoTao
snS.1adS1Psn:>~o:>oo.1tp
emlssne:>napesde:>oueqd
aenbe-soTluouaUlozlu-eqd
odds a:>aq:Joueqd
mn~e.1q~eT;)
e:>aq:Joueqd
e~slq:>ela
esde:>oueqd
esse.1:> • .I-eSapl0.11ds euaeq-euy
mn~e:>lldnpl.1penb
lDnllauaU1~
PRELIMINARY DRAFT SUBJECT TO MAJOR REVISION DO NOT QUOTE
":0mI
~
Z»:0-<o:0»."~
(J)
cOJC-
~ m()~
~
'0t~
»C-
O:0
:0m<-(J)
ozoozo~
oco-1m
0\N
r-4CIl~
o
Q.Ul
II)CIlooeo
r-lr-lCIl
. e> =' eu
..-l r-le e 0 .-4='='..-l CIJ
'r1'" 0. >~CIl Ul ='>,l.J 'r1(J'r1 tlO CIlo o.c: '"'
..-lCll 0 =',.cUr-4 r::0. >.
(J)
~ mo 0O.!ll:e 0o '"'r-l.!ll:
r-l ro~
CIJII) r-l0 eu e
'CIl ..-l ='... (J 0QJ o CIl Q.
.0 Ul (J Ul=' ..-l~ o CIJ o I-< 00 Or-l o CIJ 0I-< >'CIl >'S >.0. ....... I-< CIl '"'.0 (J .0 .0o 0 0 0:> r:: (J) r:: :> C
eu....I-<CIl
.-4='~...QJ
III Uloo CIJ 0
o tlO 0
~ ~ ~.0 > .00 .... 0C"l:l C
oM "M
~(J....I-<
0"0o 0>,..-l... .-4.0 (Jo >.c UM
3o (J0 ....
~~.0 >o 1Il0.0
....~
III CIlCIl"OI-< 0C1J.c(J (J
0,.4
eu........CIJ euI-< 0C1J ....CIl 0..c UlUl ....o tlOUl 0>'01-<.-4
o
Table 14. ChrysophytaSampled in July, 1977, by RCNSNumbers represent abundance of dominants in units/mI.
"
0.II)
euI-<CIJeu.c0.II)oII)>.I-<
J;'.~ u 0 Q Q Q c::l, c::l a j5 j5 ~ 0 C/} i ~--- -
Greenwood - - P 18 P 13 13 - - - - i- 5 - 53Colby - - - 34 - 22 - 11 - - - - 1 68Bass - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0Bear Island - - - 36 - 13 94 - - - P - 34 - 177
Birch-3 - - ... 44 - 34 P 73 - - I- - 8 159Birch-1 47 49 530 553 II> 10 ~189 -- - - - - - - -Bearhead - - 2 104 - 312 - - - 2 - I- - - f'-I20Seven Beaver - - P 21 - - 47 - - - - 10 5 - 83Pine - - - - 103 ,P 131 - - - 1 2 1 - 739Perch 8644 523 - P - - 797 - - - P i- - - 9964Tofte - - 1 - - - - - - - - I- - - 1Sand - - - 1 - 1 1 - - - - tp - - 3
Wynne - - - - 50 ... - - - - - I- P - 50White Iron - - P P p 124 89 142 107 - I- P 18 r;>86Turtle - - 2 262 - - 452 - - 21 - I- - - t737
-Ir-IIi
31.0nO LON 00 NOISIA3C1 ClorvlI\I OJ. J.Q3ranS l~VCla AtlVNlLAJI13C1d _J
ota!
hacus pyrum
UGLENOPHYTA
rachelomonus spp.
rachelomonasvolvocina
uglena sp.
hacuscaudatus
otal
eridiniumwisconsinonse
eridiniumaciculiferum
eridiniuminconspicium
eridiniumwillei
lenodinium sp.
eratiumhirundinella
lenodiniumgymnodinium
otal
AXA
CRYPTOPHYTAryptomonas
Spp.
PYRRHOPHYTA
~'-
~~ en '"0 '"0 en tD tD t:lII tD n C') t"4.., tD
C '< lU 0 It> r'- It> It> ~. .... n> lU 0 "" lU
'1 .... ::l ::l ..... '1 ;:::l <: lU '1 "" lU III ~ III "..
" " ::l Cl. " n n> n> '1 () n '1 (II C" ttl II>~ ttl ttl n> ::r :;l g ::r ::r '< ::s (II
ttl I I H CH tD III .... I..) CIl 011 ttl Cl. ~ 00 lU lU Cl.::s < ::l
ttl Cl.11
T
I I I I ICl
~ N I N \It N \It ....., ....., ....0- .- 0- .-
0 0 0 ~ N 0 0 N \It N VI ....., ....., - 0 Te
'" .- '" ....
P'
i ." '"0 I ." ." I I '"d I '"d I N I I C
>d I I I I I I I N I I I I I I-c
\It I I N IG:- ~ 1 I I .... I I I..) I
(Xl I..)
I I I I I I ." I I I I I I IP
~
." I I I I I I I I I IP
N VI N I.- .-
." >d I I I.p
I I I I ." N t I I I
VI I I I I I I >d I I I I IP
Vl I
- - 0 ~ 0 0 W VI ~ W N 0 N I..) 0 T~ (Xl 0 0-
E
." I I I I I I I ." '"d '"d I I - ." E
I I I I I I I I I N I IP
w I N
-I I I I I I - I I I I I I I I F
I I I I I '"d I I .... I I .- ..., I IT
0
I I '"d ..., I I I I I I Vl - I I I T
0 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 N .Vl N I..) .- NT
toi
~~
II>
....VI.
zenn§ lU '1
8'<C"'t:l't:lttl ~ M''1 ttl 0CIl Cl.'t:l::r'1 .... '<ttl ::s M'
't:l lU'1 c.... ..ttl CCIl~>d
~ ttl'<'<::s • '1l"t '1_::rlU \0 0C" .....,'t:lc.....,::r::s .. '<Cl. M'lU C" lU::S'<n ~ttl :;l:l C
noooz~Hlenttl
::sCl. 00 'C8 ::r.... '<::s l"tlU lU::sl"tCIl
....::s§...."CIl.....Ii~
£9
3.LOnO lON 00 NOISIA38 80rVII\I 01 l~3r8nS !.:!V80 A8VNIV\j113Hd_..I
a1
lotellaodanica
hnanthes1inearis
hnanthesminutissima
hnanthessp.
phipleuralindheimeri
terionel1aformosa
cconeisplacentu1a
agilariacrotonensis
viculacryptocephala
vicu1asp.
tzschiasp.
izosoleniaeriensis
mphonemaolivaceum
losira:'lmbigua
losiradis tans
losira~ranulata
losiraitalica
auroneis~p.
ephanodiscusniagarae
ephanodiscussp.
nedrae lica tissimaangustissimaellariaenestrata
'AD.
ynedrasp.
..-,1~ :t:: ~ H >"d 1J'l b:l til' b:l n C') t4
c: ':3 0 ..... ,(i) .... ro III 0 ... l\lr; .... g. .... ::s <: ... III til .... ro ~rt rt =:I rt (l) ro n ., til cT (l) (l).... III III III :;:l ::r '< ::l CDIII H C
H b:l CD 0... ro .... 00 III II> Q.
=' < =' I(l) Q....T
I I >"d ~ I '"0 I I I I >"d ..... Ac0-
AcI I'd I I I I I'd w I I >"d I
V1
I I N I I I I I I I >"d I Ac
I I I (Xl I I I I I I >"d Am
~ N N ~ I (Xl W N V1 W '"d " As~ 0\ W 0 (Xl " .- 0\
N "I '"d I I I I I '"d I .- '"d '"d Co
0
I I I ~ 'g. I w '"d '"d '"d 0- '"d Fr0-
'"" I'd '"d I I I I I I '"d I I Go
I " '"d '"d .... I .... 0- (Xl 0\ '"d .... Hew ~ N V1 (Xl N (Xl
0\ 0 ,
I I I '"d I I I '"d I I W I Me
I '"d 0\ I I I I ..... .- " I '"d Me" (Xl (Xl
I I I I I I I I'd I I w I Me
I '"d N I I '"0 '"d I I I '"d '"d Na
I I I'd I I I '"d '"d '"d I " '"d Na
I .... I -g I >"d \0 '"d I I " N Niw ~ 0
~Rh
I I I I w I '"d I '"d I I~
I I I I w I '"d I I I I Syt~
!
~ I I I I '"d I I I '"d I St
:g I I (XlI >"d I '"d .... '"d I I St(Xl
I (Xl N Ul(Xl >"d >"d '"d V1 I I '"d St0\ ~
I I I I I ~ I \0 I ISy- I
~ 0 0 v.
~ N N ~~ ..... ~ '"d ..... '"d '"d "Tab
~ (Xl 0- \0 .... ..... f\0
I I I '"d I I I >"d I I I 1Cye
b
:::: NN
~ N N " " w .... V1 W
~ ~w
~~V1 " .... \0 \0 V1 0 Tot
~0- 0- 0 W 0\ a. V1
0'.
~
~~III
2cnt::l
~ m~cT '0 rtIII ~o... III 801 Q. lD
....... III =' b:l
"C III... onIII n ....lD,.,. ....III 0 ....=:I 0- III,.,. (l) ..........Ill" 00- "Cc:: -::T=:I 'l:)'<p. -...J rtIII -...J III=:I .. .....,nIII 0
'<oHl:;a
nQ.2o ena....='II>='rt01
~
§....,.,.01.......a....
'..:---.."
'*
+]9
~/t ~
3.LOnO lON 00 NOISIJ\3C1 ClorvV'J 01 1~3r8nS 1~VClO AClVNIV'Ill13C1d
iastrumoryanum
iastrum
E~f~~odondrigulafitzeri
strump.
hrocytiumgardhianum
ystisaeustris
istrodesmusaleatus
ystisarva
ystisusilla
ystisp.
nedesmusbundans
nedesmuspoliensis
nedesmusuadricauda
izochlamysp.
roederiaetigera
istrodesmusalcatusaeicularisistrodesmusalca.tvsmlrabl.lishrodesmusriangvlussUbtrlangularisryocoecusraunii
amydomonasp.
mariump.
cigeniaetrapedia
cigeniaruncata
midiumrevelii
katothrixelatinosa
'AXA
>-'J ~ :<:~
H >'d "II) b' t::lt1 b' (j C") ~c: '< 0 .... .Itl .... Itl III 0 ... I»1'1 .... ;) I'-Il ;) <: ... ~ Ul .... t'\) 'X'M' rt ;) P- M' t'\) It 0 1'1 Ul 0" t'\) t'\).... t'\) t'\) t'\) ;:l ::r '< =' Ult'\) H C
H b' Ul 01'1 t'\) .... 00 Cll III 0-=' < ::J ,
t'\) Q....1
>'d I "'tl I I \0 N "'d "'d I I I Ank~ w f
I ~Ank
I I "'tl , I - "'d I I If
~w
Iv."'tl I "'tl I "'tl I I I w N I I Ank- ....
Iv. f
, I I I I I .... "'d'!Art
I I I IIv. t(Xl
I W I I I I I I I , I I Bot.... b
0 0 ~hlI I I I I I "'tl I I Iw w S
I "'d I I I N "'d I I I ~ I CosS
P- Cru"'tl P- I I OJ I "'d - - I I N.... (Xl N t
I I - I I I I "'d "tl I I I Cru00 t
I I - I I I I I I I I I Desl0 g:
OJ w I I I I I "tl "tl "tl I I Ela0\ g
I I I I I I I I I I I .... Euas
I I N I I I I I I I I I Nepa
I i I I I - , "tl I I I I Doew 1
I I I I I 00 I I I I I I Doep
~Doe
I N I I I I I I I I I~ P
I I I I "tl I U1 >'d "tl I "tl I Does
I I I I I N I "tl I I I I Pedb
I "'d I I CJ) I "tl I "'tl I I I Pedv t
I \J1 , I I I I I "'tl I , I Qua....p
I I I I I I I "'d ISeew I I- a
~ I I ISee
I I .... "tl I I IW a
I "'d N 'd ~ooSee
I I VI "'d I I Wq
;; I I I ISch
I I I I I IS
I I I N I I I I I I I Sch111
li0"....t'\)
.........Zc/)(jc:: ~ ::rS i3 ....0" "Q 0t'\) .......1'1 t'\) 0Ul C. "Q
::r1'1 .... '<t'\) ==' M'
"Q ~1'10t'\) 0Ul M't'\) 0==' 0"rtt'\)
1'1111 ..0"c:: ~==' \0Q. ....~ ....==' ..ot'\) 0"
'<o'"":xl
(jQ.Z~ C/)
....=='~rtUl
~c::=='....rtUl.......S....
rt'"
S9
3.LOnO lON 00 NOISI1\3tJ CfOrVII\I 01 1~3r8nS l=:JVtJO Al:tVNIV'J113tJd
ylosiumnum
astrumatumanctonicumsphaeridiumpitatum
aedronnimum
hiscia
astrumaurogeniaeforme
hisciaanulata
ellatryoides
1
'AXA
-i ~ ~ ~.~ "I:l 1.J'l txl l:lIl txl (') 0 r0-
c: '< 0 .... let' .... Il) III 0 t1 Ql
~ ..... ;j
~..... ;j < 01 III til .... 10 ?:",.,
" ;j " Il) ct· n 01 til t1' 10 10... Il) It. 10 ::;l ;:r' '< ::s IIIIl) ~ c
~ tXl III 0t1 III .... 00 III III Pop < ::s I
10 Q.t1
'I
I ~ I I I I I I I I I I Spo....p
StaI I I I I I I I I I I N 1
v.I I I I I I I I 0\ I I I Sty
s
I I I I I I .- I I I I ITet
0 m
~ "'C N I I I '"d "'C I I I ITet
s
I I I I I I I I I I I .... Tro,g'
~ I I I I I I I I I' ITro,
51
I I I \.oJ I I I I I IWe5'
.- bl'oJ ~ .- .- N 0
'r~t.~ 5; Ln~ :;; ~ 0- .- ....
~ \00- 'oJ \0 W (Xl W
~~10
.........nop,.,....,
,;
99
3l.0nO iON 00 NOISIA3CJ CJorvV\l Oll~3r8nS l=:lVCJO ACJVNIv-J113Hd -J..J
losphaeriumaegelianum
a1
illatoriap.
illatoriaenuis
oococcusinor
anocapsalachista
rmidiump •bdodermaineare
gbyaordguardii
illatoriaeminata
losphaeriumuetzingianum
mphosphaeriaponina
phosphaeriaacustris
acystisp.
menellumuadriduplicatumanizomenonlos-aquae
anocapsaelicatissima
abaenaplanctonica
abaenaflos-aquae
abaenap.
'AX,A
~ ~:;::
~ H "tl 1J) t:xl t:xl t:xl ("') C) t4c
~0 ~ ,/'0 ..... /'0 I» 0 11 I»
1'1 ~ ~ ..... :::I < 1'1 I» til t-' f1I ,....,.," :::I ,., /'0 l'O () ,., til 0" /'0 /'0
t-' /'0 /'0 /'0 ::J ::r '< ~UI
/'0 HH t:xl III 011 l'O .... 00 I» I» Co::s < ::J I/'0 Co
11
'I
, , , Vt , , , , , , , , An.;
, , , , , I , "tl , w I I An.-...I
1\D
I , I I N I I "tl N - I .... An.0l
I I I I I I I I Vt I I I An.:
I I I I I I .... I N I I I AgIQ'\
c
I I I I I I I w I (Xl I IApl
(Xl (Xl :-...I
~ Vt I ~- N I "tl N I I - Apl0\ - CI::'- -
I I I I - I I I I I I I ApI0 4
~ I I I I I Vt N I I I I Ch:-...I I
I N I I I I I "tl I I I I C041
I N I I I I N I I I I I COl
•
.... - I I I N I I I I I I Com~ 0 1
I I w I Vt I I I I I I I Lynn
Vt :' I N I I "tl I I I I ascw g
.... (Xl I I I I ~ I I I I asc(Xl w
t
N I I I I -...Iasc
I I I I IS
I I I I I I I N I "tl VtPho
_C::
... I I I I I t I t I I I Rha~ 1
I t I I I t 0\ I t I I Coe-...I
n
~'-J _ -~ - N N - - N 0 -...I
~ - (Xl w W \D W 0\ Tot;:> 0 w ....w
>
....CD
~I»a"....f1I
zenn§'~ ':0" '0 :::I/'0 .... 01'1/'0'0rnp..::r
'<1'1 ~,.,
/'0 :::I I»'01'10/'0 ()(I) ,.,
/'0 0:::I a'"/'0
11I» ..a'C ....:::I \Dp.."I» ":::I ..()/'00'
'<oHl~nQ.zo ena~
:::I
~"(I)~:::I
§~
"(I)......a....
_''--''H.
",
L9
3.LOnO .LON oa NOISIA3CJ CJorvV\l O.L .LQ3ranS .L.:IVCJO ACJVNIv--J113CJd_J
.-1
eobotrysp.
lomonaskrokomos
ioeytiumarvu1um
rospararassier
udokephurionntzii
uravella
a1
rysolykosplanctonica
AXA
repyxissp.
cerasehodat1.
nobryonbavaricum
nobryondivergens
nobryonertularia
nobryonertulariaprotuberans
nobryonoeiale
obryonabellariae
...:J ~ ~ ~ H "d "Vl tI' tI' to n c;') ~c: 0 ..... 1ft) .... ft) II) 0 ~ CD'i ~ ;j g. ..... ;j <: l'1 til CIl .... Cll 'l'"
'"' n ;j '"' ft) ft) n 'i CIl 0'" Ib Cll.... Ib Ib Ib :J :r '< ::s III(ll H C
H to CIl 0~ Ib .... 00 II) CD 0.=' < ::s IIb 0.
11
I
I I I I I N I I I t I I Chl
I
I I 0 I I I I I I I I IDel
w ~
..... ..... I NCD N I N N I I I Die0 '" '" e
\Jl I I I I N I W I s:- I IDi
N .......\,.oJ
w I 0 I '" I-" I ..... N I I IDi
N N 0W 0\
I I I I I I I ....... I I I IDi
I ..... I I I I I "tl I I-" I IOir
'" 0 ~
v.
I I I I I \,.oJ I I I I "tl IOir
I-"~
~ I I I I I I I I I I IOfr
t
I I I I I-" I I N I I I I Gle00
e
I N. I 0\ , I , I-" \,.oJ "tl I I MalN N .....
G
~ I I I I I I I I I I I Micc
I I I I I I 00 I I I I I Opll
P
I I I I I I N I , I I I Psee
~ I I l.nl I , "tl , "tl I I Syn~ u
~ W 0 ~ CD \,.oJ ..... N \,.oJ '" 0 0 Totlr> s:- ~ CD ~ 0 " \Jl N
,
....\0
.-i
~....Ib
zenn§ ~ ~0'" 't;l '<Ib .... CIl~ Ib 0Cll 0. '0
::r'~ ~'<Ib =' n
't;l II)~ 0Ib 0Cll nIb 0=' 0'"nib
~II) ..0'"s:: I-"
=' \00. .......II) .......
=' ..o1b0'"
'<ot-tI:;o
no.zo ene~
='~nCll
~
='§~
nCll
Ea....
r'
89
69
.,,""'-.-....-:'
,
~olN 0 0 N co tJ"I 0 \0 0 0 \0 0
1\
ell .... , , N ~ tJ"I , I I I N I
1\
ell .... , I , I I I I I I , I
::>ell , I , , I , , N I , I ,S
N II I , , , , , N , ,e4d ,eda'1 , I , , \0 I , I I I , I
S
8n3 I , I ,~ I I N , I N I
Dna
("'l
:l°l 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N 0 0 0 In
S
lad , I , , , I N , I , I In
S C;WAD I I I I I I I I I 0 I I
4la::> I I I I I , , N I I , ,
NIO
co ..... ("'l r--- ..;t r--- ex> ('<"l ~ 0\ 0
=l°l..;t N .... r--- N N .... 0- \0 .... In ~('<"l ("'l ('<"l \0 ("'l ('<"l In ..;t
Pr---, , , ~a=lS .... I I ,
~,
~ ~
S \0 tJ"I \0
AlJ I N , , I - I , I ('<"l I N
a r--- -:r ..;t 0 N ..;t 0\ .....Al::> ..;t I N N r--- co ex> In ..;t ('<"l ..;t ('<"l....S M
('<"l r--- co ..;t ('<"l 0l4::> , , co \0 ('<"l , .... ex> I ~ r--- ,e ..;t ..;t ..;t N ('<"l 0\ 0
0 0 ..... 0\ \0 ..... N ..;t \0I , .... C""l N I C""l N ('<"l ..... C""l (""
l4::>
'aH::>
.I.t.4-a Q)
I c:~
c:~ I1l 00 ~ 111 ~0 IJ) c:Q ~
:J ~ 111III c: >- .c: c: 111 Q) Q) ~
Q) Q) .0 til ~ (J 111 111 ..a '2 c ..a ..a,.:,I. ClI ~ til I1l ~ > c ..... c .... ~
I1l ~ 0 I1l ClI .... 111' .... a ~ >. § ='.,J Co:) u c:Q pQ c:Q Vl. ~ H :l: E-'
- ..
YXV
-dseuowoo
eSOlseuowo=ld
VlXHdOldJ.
-dseuowo=ld
VlXHdON3'1
Ie
emo=l°4::>1seuollloxal
-dsn::>
e~n-=>
sl~aupo
-d
eual
eUl-=>OAlOseuowoF~4::>
eSO::>nl.laseuol1lo1a4::>
e::>llpuHAseuol1lo1a4::>
le
-d
tunuIPl
-dwnlulPoU
eI1aulpun.lTmnl=le
SalV'1'13~V'1.:iO
r PRELIMINARY DRAFT SUBJECT TO MAJOR REVISION DO NOT QUOTE