Bermuda Triangle ppt bestBermuda Triangle ppt bestBermuda Triangle ppt best
Riippi ppt
-
Upload
glenn-e-malone-edd -
Category
Education
-
view
104 -
download
1
description
Transcript of Riippi ppt
OFFICE OF SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION
Division of Assessment and Student Information
OSPI Assessment and Student Information Update
Test Directors NetworkAugust 11, 2014
Christopher Hanczrik, Director of Assessment Operations
Cinda Parton, Director of Assessment Development
Dr. Deb Came, Director of Student Information
08/11/2014 Slide 2
OFF
ICE O
F S
UPE
RIN
TEN
DEN
T O
F PU
BLI
C IN
STR
UC
TIO
N
Five Key Messages for Smarter Balanced Assessments
1. New assessments are needed due to change in learning standards.
2. Smarter Balanced assessments are being jointly developed by 22 states and territories (less expensive, powerful design).
3. The name ‘Balanced’ is intentional – ongoing classroom based assessment as part of instruction will improve learning.
4. These tests will be more accessible to more students (translations, accommodations, supports).
5. 2015 results will set a new baseline of student performance in Washington.
Smarter Balanced Assessments
Common Core State Standards specify
K-12 expectatio
ns for college and
career readiness
All students
leave high
school college
and career ready
Teachers and schools have information and tools
they need to improve teaching
rand learning
Summative: College and career
readiness assessments for
accountability
Interim: Flexible and open
assessments, used for actionable
feedback
Formative Educator Resources:
Digital Library with instructional and
professional learning resources that include embedded formative
assessment processes Page 3
August 7, 2014 Slide 9
OFF
ICE O
F S
UPE
RIN
TEN
DEN
T O
F PU
BLI
C IN
STR
UC
TIO
N
Administration windows
Online Grades 3-8 (EXCEPT 3rd grade ELA) – last 12 weeks
of school, but no earlier than March 9 and no later than June 15
Grade 11 – last 7 weeks of school, but not earlier than April 6 and no later than June 15
3rd Grade ELA – no earlier than March 9 and no later than April 23
Score reports available 3 weeks after school completes testing
08/11/2014 Slide 10
OFF
ICE O
F S
UPE
RIN
TEN
DEN
T O
F PU
BLI
C IN
STR
UC
TIO
N
Administration Details
Length of tests The tests are not timed. Estimated times vary
by grade level: about 3 – 4.5 hours per subject area test.
Students may take each subject area test over 1 to 3 days.
August 7, 2014 Slide 11
OFF
ICE O
F S
UPE
RIN
TEN
DEN
T O
F PU
BLI
C IN
STR
UC
TIO
N
Accessibility Accessibility addressed in three categories:
Universal tools (for all students, at all times during administration) Designated supports (for any student as educator concludes need) Accommodations (specific to students with IEPs or 504 plans
documenting need)
Like the tests, Smarter Balanced leveraged collaboration amongst states and national experts to develop accessibility guidelines focused on students AND content constructs.
Smarter Balanced approach is consistent with recent USED guidance on supporting greater student access that results in valid test outcomes.
August 7, 2014 Slide 12
OFF
ICE O
F S
UPE
RIN
TEN
DEN
T O
F PU
BLI
C IN
STR
UC
TIO
N
Accessibility, cont’
Smarter Balanced tests will have translations or glossaries in 10 languages and dialects, and American Sign Language.
The online testing platform embeds the tools, supports and accommodations within the system appropriate to a student’s need (e.g., text-to-speech, enlarged print, color contrast).
Greater accessibility also acknowledges occasional need to use non-embedded accommodations and supports (e.g., scribing, speech-to-text, read-aloud).
The interim assessments will have the same accessibility supports as the summative test administration.
August 7, 2014 Slide 13
OFF
ICE O
F S
UPE
RIN
TEN
DEN
T O
F PU
BLI
C IN
STR
UC
TIO
N
2014-2015 Accessibility Guidelines:Plan for All Washington Testing
Our philosophy will be accessibility designed to optimize student testing experiences
A consolidated set of guidelines, adapted to testing formats (i.e., paper/pencil) Smarter Balanced’s well-developed, researched-based guidelines will
frame the approach to access for all state assessments.
State providing supports to educators in understanding and implementing new guidelines.
A student’s access needs do not change between tests, but implementation methods might need to change.
August 7, 2014 Slide 14
OFF
ICE O
F S
UPE
RIN
TEN
DEN
T O
F PU
BLI
C IN
STR
UC
TIO
N
Smarter Balanced Online Tools
Many online tools are built into Smarter Balanced, such as:
Highlighter Calculator Zoom Digital notepad English dictionary and glossary
In addition, all students will be allowed to have scratch paper, protractor, ruler, and other tools.
Accessibility Features
General Amer. Sign Lang.BrailleClosed CaptioningColor Contrast (4 types)MaskingPrint on Demand (items)Print on Demand (stimuli)Streamlined InterfaceText-to-Speech (items)Text-to-Speech (stimuli)Zoom (4 levels)
Translations and Glossaries Full Translation (Stacked)
Spanish (Math items)
Glossaries (>89% ofELs)
EnglishArabic CantoneseKoreanMandarinPunjabiRussianSpanishTagalogUkrainianVietnamese
August 7, 2014 Slide 16
OFF
ICE O
F S
UPE
RIN
TEN
DEN
T O
F PU
BLI
C IN
STR
UC
TIO
N
Practice Tests Always Available The practice tests, in English language
arts/literacy (ELA) and mathematics for grades 3 through 8 and 11, each include approximately 30 questions.
Practice tests are available to everyone – students, teachers, parents, the general public.
The Smarter Balanced Practice Tests continue to be updated with new questions and performance tasks.
New enhancements (released in May) include additional embedded universal tools, designated supports and accommodations.
Working with Resources(before testing)
• Practice Test– All item types and Performance Tasks– Available to all on Web since May 2013– Updated periodically with new features– http://sbac.portal.airast.org/practice-test/
• Training Test– Shorter than Practice Test– Trains students on features and tools
2014 Summative Field Test
A Test of the Test
08/11/2014 Slide 19
OFF
ICE O
F S
UPE
RIN
TEN
DEN
T O
F PU
BLI
C IN
STR
UC
TIO
N
Field Test Update
Field test completed by 186,800 students in Washington, and 4,200,935 across the consortium
• Purpose of field test was to:
• Help ensure assessments are valid, reliable, and fair for all students
• Provide teachers, schools, and students an opportunity to participate in a practice run of the assessment system
• Evaluate performance of 20,000+ assessment items and performance tasks
• Set preliminary achievement standards that help determine student preparedness for college and career
08/11/2014 Slide 20
OFF
ICE O
F S
UPE
RIN
TEN
DEN
T O
F PU
BLI
C IN
STR
UC
TIO
N
Field Test Update, cont.’
Field testing was remarkably smooth Feedback regarding technology was very
positive!!! Small glitches but nothing widespread. Concurrent users not a factor No major local network issues. Bandwidth
seems to not have been a problem. Some device related problems. Districts have a sense of relief that things
worked out. Challenge for next year seems to be ironing
out glitches as well as scheduling problems due to inadequate number of devices at some schools.
08/11/2014 Slide 21
OFF
ICE O
F S
UPE
RIN
TEN
DEN
T O
F PU
BLI
C IN
STR
UC
TIO
N
Field Test Update, cont.’ What did we learn:
Content is a bigger problem than technology Familiarity with keyboarding and digital tools
(e.g., calculator) is important Scheduling (longer sessions vs. several shorter
sessions) is worth a significant discussion Consider having staff take practice test Interim assessments will provide a run-through
opportunity Rigor does not seem to be too shocking, but
certainly some sense of “harder”
08/11/2014 Slide 22
OFF
ICE O
F S
UPE
RIN
TEN
DEN
T O
F PU
BLI
C IN
STR
UC
TIO
N
Field Test Update, cont.’ Your diligence in preparing schools has really
paid off Practice tests Training materials Technology readiness Contingency planning
08/11/2014 Slide 23
OFF
ICE O
F S
UPE
RIN
TEN
DEN
T O
F PU
BLI
C IN
STR
UC
TIO
N
After the Field Test: What Next?
Share “Best Practices” identified through field test.
Consortium has revised Test Administration Manual, etc.
Policy clarification for some things, for example: Can districts go against “recommendations” in
the TAM?
Improved systems, for example: The student data management system. The accommodations/designated support
collection system.
Working with new assessment delivery vendor, American Institutes of Research (A-I-R) to build the best delivery system possible.
08/11/2014 Slide 24
OFF
ICE O
F S
UPE
RIN
TEN
DEN
T O
F PU
BLI
C IN
STR
UC
TIO
N
OSPI Goals with Respect to Smarter Balanced Communications Clarify for districts where answers can be found
(OSPI or vendor).
Try not to overwhelm districts/schools with communication.
Iron out duplicate communications.
Manage local interpretations of issues. For example, google user groups sometimes promote information that does not impact all users or is incorrect.
Work out an emergency plan for crisis management situations.
08/11/2014 Slide 25
OFF
ICE O
F S
UPE
RIN
TEN
DEN
T O
F PU
BLI
C IN
STR
UC
TIO
N
Smarter Balanced + Higher Ed
Unprecedented movement to use mandatory high school tests in college placement
State Board for Community and Technical Colleges (SBCTC) and Washington Student Achievement Council (WSAC) involved
Draft agreement to provide access to juniors who score a 3 or 4 on the SBAC ELA and math tests in to credit bearing courses All community colleges Some baccalaureates
Connects with movement to allow transcripts based on placement – not the old system with “all or none” based on Compass or Accuplacer exams
08/11/2014 Slide 26
OFF
ICE O
F S
UPE
RIN
TEN
DEN
T O
F PU
BLI
C IN
STR
UC
TIO
N
But Smarter Balanced is so Much More!
In addition to the spring test, we will be given access to:
Online “interim” tests using questions/items that teachers can use throughout the school year as part of teaching.
Other resources in a Digital Library for teachers to use for professional development.
Digital Library
Educator resources for formative assessment practices
to improve instruction
August 11, 201427
Digital Library Preview Period
June 3 – September 30, 2014
Test the initial software
application
Provide users access to an initial
set of resources that will grow
The Digital Library: By the Numbers
• Open review June 6 – Sept 30 for all K-12 teachers in member states
• Currently 1,066 resources– Forums available on every resource
– State-of-the-art tagging and search features can quickly find resources by CCSS and other topics
• 141,233 authorized users a/o July 18
• After Sept 30: Access for teachers in subscribing states only
Digital Library Basics• The Digital Library will be accessed through a single sign-on with
user permission levels so educators have access to all of the instructional and professional learning resources for each grade band (Grades K-2, 3-5, 6-8, 9-12).
• There will be resources that educators can share or use with students and families, but students and families will not be able to access materials directly.
• All resources will have the formative assessment process embedded within them. But the Digital Library WILL NOT be a “bank” of formative assessment items alone.
• All submitted materials will be vetted through a Quality Criteria Review Process by reviewers across the nation.
• Each resource will be reviewed and rated by at least 3 trained educators
• If resources do not meet the quality criteria, they will not be included in the library Page 30
Digital Library Functionality• Enables State Networks
of Educators and State Leadership Teams to submit, review, and publish resources
• Allows educators to view, download, and rate resources
• Uses state-of-the-art tagging and search to quickly find resources by CCSS and other topics
• Enables educators from across the Consortium to collaborate and share their knowledge
• Facilitates access to resources that are stored in participating libraries
Illustrative
Slide 31
Resources in the Digital Library
* Resources include the following file types: Video, HTML5, Audio, PPT, Excel, Word, and PDF.
• Commissioned professional development modules• Resources for students and families
• Frame formative assessment within a balanced assessment system
• Articulate the formative assessment process• Highlight formative assessment practices and tools
• Commissioned professional development modules• Instructional materials for educators • Instructional materials for students
• High-quality vetted instructional resources and tools for educators
• High-quality vetted resources and tools for students and families
• Reflect and support the formative process• Reflect and support the Common Core State Standards
for Mathematics and English Language Arts• Create Professional Learning Communities
Assessment Literacy Modules
Exemplar Instructional Modules
Education Resources
Page 32
• Demonstrate/support effective implementation of the formative process
• Focus on key content and practice from the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics and English Language Arts
Digital Library: Collaboration
Digital Library: Collaboration
Digital Library: Collaboration
Digital Library: Collaboration
Digital Library: Collaboration
Digital Library: Collaboration
Grounded in this Definition of Formative Assessment Process
• Formative Assessment is a deliberate process used by teachers and students during instruction that provides actionable feedback that is used to adjust ongoing teaching and learning strategies to improve students’ attainment of curricular learning targets/goals.
~ Compiled by the Digital Library National Advisory Panel
Page 39
Quality Criteria for Professional Learning Resources
The resource…
1) Reflects research and/or the principles of effective professional learning
2) Incorporates formative assessment practices
3) Supports learner differences and personalized learning
4) Demonstrates utility, engagement, and user-friendliness
5) Integrates technology and media effectively
Page 41
Quality Criteria for Instructional Resources
The resource…
1) Aligns with the intent of the Common Core State Standards
2) Incorporates formative assessment practices
3) Contains accurate, complete, high-quality curriculum and instruction
4) Supports learner differences and personalized learning
5) Demonstrates utility, engagement, and user-friendliness
6) Integrates technology and media effectively
Page 42
Smarter Balanced Digital Library:Formative Assessment Practices and
Professional Learning – educator involvement
National Advisory Panel (NAP)
• 11-20 experts• Begins December 2012• Provides policies and
criteria for resources
State Leadership Team (SLT)• 10-14 WA members• Provides support and
training for State Network of Educators
• Promote statewide communications
State Network of Educators (SNE)• 85 WA Members (1,500+
nationally)• Representation from
LEAs, AEAs, content leaders, ELL, IHE
• Serve Summer 2013 – Late Fall 2014
• Submit and review resources
Page 43
Interim Assessments
WASA-AWSP June 30, 201444
August 7, 2014 Slide 45
OFF
ICE O
F S
UPE
RIN
TEN
DEN
T O
F PU
BLI
C IN
STR
UC
TIO
N
Interim Assessment Design Principles
Administered through the same system as Summative
Can be administered at various points in the year
Optional for districts Online administration Adaptive as appropriate Adhere to Usability, Accessibility, and
Accommodations Guidelines Items drawn from same pool as Summative;
full array of item types Not intended for accountability decisions
August 7, 2014 Slide 46
OFF
ICE O
F S
UPE
RIN
TEN
DEN
T O
F PU
BLI
C IN
STR
UC
TIO
N
Interim Assessment Components
Interim Assessment
Interim Comprehensive
Assessment (ICA)
Interim Assessment
Blocks (IAB)
August 7, 2014 Slide 47
OFF
ICE O
F S
UPE
RIN
TEN
DEN
T O
F PU
BLI
C IN
STR
UC
TIO
N
Interim Assessment User Interface, Scoring and Reporting
User interface Details for accessing items are not yet
determined. Interim test engine is still in development.
Scoring Interim assessments will have various item
types, most of which will be machine scored Hand scoring will be a local (school/classroom)
responsibility Rubrics and training will be provided
August 7, 2014 Slide 48
OFF
ICE O
F S
UPE
RIN
TEN
DEN
T O
F PU
BLI
C IN
STR
UC
TIO
N
Interim Assessment User Interface, Scoring and Reporting, continued
Reporting Interim Comprehensive Assessment (ICA)
Report same information as Summative Assessment Overall composite scale score Achievement levels Claim level information
Interim Assessment Blocks (IABs) Report information consistent with claim level
information
Item level reporting is a future feature (not on current work plan)
02/27/2014 Slide 51
OFF
ICE O
F S
UPE
RIN
TEN
DEN
T O
F PU
BLI
C IN
STR
UC
TIO
N
IABs for ELACurrent Thinking on Coverage
Proposed Interim Assessment Blocks (IAB)1 Read Literary Texts
2 Read Informational/Explanatory Texts
3 Write Brief Narrative Text
4 Narrative Performance Task
5 Write Brief Informational/Explanatory Texts
6 Informational Performance Task
7 Write Brief Opinion** Texts
8 Opinion** Performance Task
9Revise/Edit (across Narrative, Informational/Explanatory, and Opinion texts)
10 Listen/Interpret
11* Speaking
12 Research
*Placeholder until items are developed**”Opinion” is “Argumentative” for grades 6-8 and 11
02/27/2014 Slide 52
OFF
ICE O
F S
UPE
RIN
TEN
DEN
T O
F PU
BLI
C IN
STR
UC
TIO
N
IABs for math Current Thinking on Coverage
Proposed Interim Assessment Blocks (IAB)
Grades 3-5
1 Operations and Algebraic Thinking
2Numbers and Operations in Base Ten
3 Fractions
4 Geometry
5 MeasurementProposed Interim Assessment Blocks
(IAB)Grades 6-7
1Ratios and Proportional Relationships
2 Number System
3 Expressions and Equations
4 Geometry
5 Statistics and Probability
Proposed Interim Assessment Blocks (IAB)
Grade 8
1 Expressions and Equations - I
2 Expressions and Equations - II
3 Functions
4 Geometry
02/27/2014 Slide 53
OFF
ICE O
F S
UPE
RIN
TEN
DEN
T O
F PU
BLI
C IN
STR
UC
TIO
N
IABs for math Current Thinking on Coverage
Proposed Interim Assessment Blocks (IAB)High School
Algebra and Functions1 Linear Functions2 Quadratics3 Exponentials4 Polynomials5 Radicals6 Rationals7 Trigonometric
Geometry8 Transformations9 Right Triangle Ratios
10 Three-Dimensional Geometry11 Proofs12 Circles13 Applications
Other14 Statistics and Probability
02/27/2014 Slide 54
OFF
ICE O
F S
UPE
RIN
TEN
DEN
T O
F PU
BLI
C IN
STR
UC
TIO
N
Interim Assessments Timeline
Interim Assessments will be available in late fall of 2014 Items have to get through field testing, scoring,
and standard setting
Initial release will include a fixed form Interim Comprehensive Assessment (ICA) for each grade level and content area Adaptive forms will be available as the item pool
allows
Initial release will also include a fixed form Interim Assessment Block (IAB) for most blocks Adaptive IABs will be available as the item pool
allows All blocks will have adaptive IABs after 2014-15
08/11/2014 Slide 55
OFF
ICE O
F S
UPE
RIN
TEN
DEN
T O
F PU
BLI
C IN
STR
UC
TIO
N
Current Timelines
All components of Smarter Balanced will be operational in 2014-15 Digital Library available fall 2014 (end of Sept)
Preview began June 3 – sign-ups needed
Interim assessments available late fall 2014 (Dec?) Summative assessments administered in spring 2015
11th grade – last 7 weeks of year 3-8th grade – last 12 weeks of year (3rd gr ELA more limited) Grade 3 ELA results must be returned in time for principals
to meet with parents before the end of the year so window is short and early
Student score reports available June 2015 (or three weeks after testing is completed if online)
A System of Assessments
Two Other Smarter Balanced Activities
WASA-AWSP June 30, 201457
08/11/2014 Slide 58
OFF
ICE O
F S
UPE
RIN
TEN
DEN
T O
F PU
BLI
C IN
STR
UC
TIO
N
1. Early Fall - Achievement Level Setting
Formerly known as ‘Standard Setting’ Three major activities
Online input – everyone welcome 3 hour commitment Sign-up now through Sept 19, 2014
In-person panel 17-20 from WA Applications closed May 16
Articulation committee Initial achievement levels will be revisited in
2015
08/11/2014 Slide 59
OFF
ICE O
F S
UPE
RIN
TEN
DEN
T O
F PU
BLI
C IN
STR
UC
TIO
N
What is “Achievement Level Setting”?
Commonly known as “standard-setting”
Process of establishing one or more scores for proficiency on a test
Allows state and local education agencies to create categories of performance for students
08/11/2014 Slide 60
OFF
ICE O
F S
UPE
RIN
TEN
DEN
T O
F PU
BLI
C IN
STR
UC
TIO
N
Setting a New Baseline
New content standards:
Clear expectations for educators, students and parents about the knowledge and skills students need to be on track for college and/or career
New assessments:
Challenging and engaging for students, provide teachers and school leaders with better information to help students
New performance baseline:
Proficiency scores developed by educators that reflect high expectations for students
08/11/2014 Slide 61
OFF
ICE O
F S
UPE
RIN
TEN
DEN
T O
F PU
BLI
C IN
STR
UC
TIO
N
Major Activities Online Panel
Crowd sourcing – thousands of participants
Recommendations broken down by subgroup (teachers, higher education, etc.)
In-Person Panel 500 participants in grade/subject panels
Nominated by states
Bookmark procedure, are provided Online Panel results
Vertical Articulation Committee 60 panelists from In-Person Panel
Review Online Panel and In-Person Panel results
Recommend changes
08/11/2014 Slide 62
OFF
ICE O
F S
UPE
RIN
TEN
DEN
T O
F PU
BLI
C IN
STR
UC
TIO
N
Goals
Panels recommend scores that distinguish levels of performance on the summative assessments
Recommendations are coherent from grade-to-grade
Process involves a large group of educators and practitioners in Smarter Balanced states
Collect input from other participants including interested community members
States approve recommendations, consistent with their decision-making processes
08/11/2014 Slide 63
OFF
ICE O
F S
UPE
RIN
TEN
DEN
T O
F PU
BLI
C IN
STR
UC
TIO
N
Benefits to Educators
Chance to learn more about the Smarter Balanced test before administration to students
Capacity for thousands of educators to participate
Opportunity for continuing input into the assessments
Review actual test items and recommend scores for proficiency
08/11/2014 Slide 64
OFF
ICE O
F S
UPE
RIN
TEN
DEN
T O
F PU
BLI
C IN
STR
UC
TIO
N
Achievement Level Setting Timeline• State chiefs approve plan/process for
Achievement Level SettingApril 30• Online Panel open to thousands of educators
and other constituentsOctober 6-17• In-Person panels convene to recommend
grade-level performance standards October 13-19• Vertical Articulation by subgroup of In-Person
panels looks at across-grade coherenceOctober 20• Technical Advisory Committee reviews
proceedings October 30• State chiefs vote to endorse achievement
level recommendationsNovember 6
08/11/2014 Slide 65
OFF
ICE O
F S
UPE
RIN
TEN
DEN
T O
F PU
BLI
C IN
STR
UC
TIO
N
How You Can Help Encourage colleagues to register for the Online Panel
Ask about informational materials. Items such as sample invitations and FAQ are available
Look for more information on the Smarter Balanced website and in newsletters
08/11/2014 Slide 66
OFF
ICE O
F S
UPE
RIN
TEN
DEN
T O
F PU
BLI
C IN
STR
UC
TIO
N
Register in Four Easy StepsSmarterBalanced.org/OnlinePanel
Step 1 - Select a content area and grade level.
Step 2 – Enter your email address and contact information.
Step 3 – Check your email for a message and confirm your email address.
Step 4 – Select a two-day window between October 6 and 17, 2014.
08/11/2014 Slide 67
OFF
ICE O
F S
UPE
RIN
TEN
DEN
T O
F PU
BLI
C IN
STR
UC
TIO
N
Key Takeaways Achievement level setting: recommending scores for
proficiency based on achievement level descriptors
Occurring in October 2014 through both Online and In-Person Panels for Achievement Level Setting
Inclusive, consensus-based and scientifically rigorous design
Thousands of educators will be able to participate
Learn more and register to participate at SmarterBalanced.org/OnlinePanel
08/11/2014 Slide 68
OFF
ICE O
F S
UPE
RIN
TEN
DEN
T O
F PU
BLI
C IN
STR
UC
TIO
N
2. Selected a Smarter Balanced Vendor to Support Our State’s Implementation
RFP – Multi-Agency Assessment Cooperative Washington, Hawaii, Idaho, South Dakota, US
Virgin Islands, West Virginia Smarter Balanced assessments, Science MSP
and EOC, new state exit exams New vendor: American Institute for
Research (A-I-R) Start date Aug 2014 Negotiations still underway, so not locked in
just yet
August 11, 201469
Score reporting
Overview of What is Reported
• Summative Assessments
Overall scale score with error bands
Achievement level per content area/subject
Claim score reporting
• Interim Comprehensive Assessments
Same as above
• Interim Assessment Blocks
Reporting for each block is based on three classifications related to overall scale score cut point, similar to claim score reporting.
70
Features of the Reporting System
• Report Features
Visual and numerical representation of data
o Scaled scores, achievement levels, claim-level information, and error bands on Math and ELA summative and interim assessments
Sorting features
Filtering features
Translations of individual reports into Spanish or Vietnamese
Data privacy
71
Report Samples
• Individual STUDENT report
• List of students in a GRADE
• Results by grade for a SCHOOL
• Comparing schools in a DISTRICT
• Comparing districts in a STATE
72
Individual STUDENT Report
73
Robert
List of Students in a GRADE
74
Comparing Schools in a DISTRICT
75
Data Extracts and Downloads
• Registration statistics extract
• Assessment completion extract
• Student assessment results data
• Individual item response data
• Current view (in tabular form)
76
77
Interim Assessment BlockReporting Preview
Learn More and Stay Engaged To experience the assessment yourself,
take the Practice Test:
www.SmarterBalanced.org/practice-test For the latest news and developments on Smarter
Balanced in Washington: http://www.k12.wa.us/smarter/default.aspx
Materials for administration, as well as communication templates for parents and community: http://sbac.portal.airast.org/field-test/resources/
For questions about Smarter Balanced or the assessment system transitions, contact: [email protected] 360-725-6348
August 7, 2014
Other Testing in Washington
August 11, 2014
08/11/2014 Slide 84
OFF
ICE O
F S
UPE
RIN
TEN
DEN
T O
F PU
BLI
C IN
STR
UC
TIO
N
English Language Proficiency
WELPA to be administered similarly to the past CTB still the WELPA vendor
ELPA 21, next generation language proficiency test, being developed by a consortium of states Lead by Oregon Executive director soon to be Margaret Ho 2014-15 will involve pilot testing More information to come
08/11/2014 Slide 85
OFF
ICE O
F S
UPE
RIN
TEN
DEN
T O
F PU
BLI
C IN
STR
UC
TIO
N
WaKIDS
WaKIDS to be administered similarly to the past Teaching Strategies still the WaKIDS vendor
Training underway now
Questions?
Thank you!Send questions to:
[email protected]@k12.wa.us